Download pdf - Comparison of reading achievement and retention

3

Comparison of Reading Achievement and Retention of Mathayomsuksa 3 Students Reading Passage on Computer Monitor with Different Highlight Colors

1*

. 2

3 3 3 2 2555 300 10 30 Google Docs 1 10 Google Docs .05 (31.26, 28.43) : , ,

1* 2

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this research were to compare Mathayomsuksa 3 students reading achievement and to compare students retention when reading passage from computer monitor with different highlight colors. The subject was 300 Mathayomsuksa 3 students from Srithammarat Suksa school. They were divided into 10 groups of 30 students. Each group was assigned to read passages which presented by only one color of ten colors from Google Docs program. The research instruments were online document, pre-test, post-test, and retention test. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, and one-way ANOVA. The research results revealed that there were statistically significant differences of reading achievement and retention among the experimental groups at 0.5 level. The highest mean score of reading achievement and retention are from the lightblue (31.26, 28.43) group. Keywords : Reading Achievement, Retention, Highlight Color

( , 2553)

Amazon Cloud Drive, Dropbox, Google Drive, Mozy, Windows Live SkyDrive ZumoDrive (Aaron, 2012) Google (Gibbs, 2011) (Paperless) (Duchastel, 1988) ( , 2547) (2538)

(, 2555) (Highlighting) (Chi, 2005) ( , 2540)

Google Google ( , 2543) 3 Google 1. 3 2. 3

1. Google Docs 10

2. 2 2.1 2.2

2. (Experimental Research) 3 3 2.1 3 13 650 650 1 60 583 (Simple Sampling) 300 583 30 10 10 10 1 1 2.2

2.2.1 10 1 4

2.2.2 1. 4 43

2. 4 43 Google

2.3 2.3.1

1.

2. Google Chrome Mozilla Firefox

3. 3.1

3.2

43 40

3.3 1 1 1 35

3.4 43 40

4. 5. 4

40 6.

2.3.2

1. 43

2. 43

2.4

3

2.4.1 10 Google Docs (Mean) (Standard Deviation) 2.4.2 (one-way ANOVA) .05 Tukey

3. 3.1 1

10 3

n Pre-test Post-test

Min. Max. Mean S.D. Min. Max. Mean S.D. 30 5 18 10.36 3.27 12 38 31.26 5.89 30 6 16 10.76 2.64 18 39 31.00 5.66 30 7 19 12.03 3.01 21 36 29.73 4.60 30 5 16 10.10 2.80 19 38 29.40 4.90 30 6 17 10.80 2.53 11 39 27.93 7.80 30 6 20 11.96 3.73 18 37 26.93 4.82 30 6 16 10.46 3.12 13 37 25.83 7.47 30 5 16 10.66 2.56 12 38 21.90 8.34 30 7 18 11.43 3.62 9 36 20.83 7.23 30 5 15 10.03 2.47 9 30 18.83 6.42 : 43

1 3 (31.26) (31.00) (29.73)

2 df SS MS F Sig.

9 139.163 15.463 1.705 .087 290 2630.233 9.070 299 2769.397

sig .05 2 3

3 3

Google Docs df SS MS F Sig.

9 5120.733 568.970 13.694 .000 290 12048.933 41.548 299 17169.667

sig .05 3 3

.05

4 10 3

n

Min. Max. Mean S.D. 30 10 36 28.43 5.56

30 11 36 27.56 7.21

30 14 36 24.90 6.16

30 12 38 24.83 6.55

30 8 33 22.60 7.58

30 8 32 21.53 5.45

30 6 29 19.70 6.66

30 6 30 18.36 5.60

30 7 30 16.90 5.49

30 8 25 14.23 4.31

300 6 38 21.90 7.47

4 3 (28.43) (27.56) (24.90) 5 3

Google Docs df SS MS F Sig. 9 5823.78 647.087 17.22 .000 290 10897.60 37.578 299 16721.387

Sig

( , 2538)

3

Google Docs

.05

2. Google Docs 3 (28.43) (27.56) (24.90) Google Docs (18.36) (16.90) (14.23) ( , 2539) (2541) Tinker . (2538) 3 1) 2) 3) 3 ( , 2548) Google Docs 3 Google Docs .05 4. 1. 3 Google Docs Google Docs .05

Google Docs 45 .05 19 (31.26, 25.83) (31.26, 21.90)

(31.26, 20.83) (31.26, 18.83) (31.00, 21.90) (31.00, 20.83) (31.00, 18.83) (29.73, 21.90) (29.73, 20.83) (29.73, 18.83) (29.40, 21.90) (29.40, 20.83) (29.40,18.83) (27.93, 21.90) (27.93, 20.83) (27.93, 18.83) (26.93, 20.83) (26.93, 18.83) (25.83, 18.83) 26

Google Docs 3 3 (31.26) (31.00) (29.73) (18.83)

2. 3 Google Docs Google Docs .05 45 .05 23 (28.43, 22.60) (28.43, 21.53) (28.43, 19.70) (28.43, 18.36) (28.43, 16.90) (28.43, 14.23) (27.56, 21.53) (27.56, 19.70) (27.56, 18.36) (27.56, 16.90) (27.56, 14.23) (24.90, 19.70) (24.90, 18.36) (24.90, 14.23) (24.90, 16.90) (24.83, 19.70) (24.83, 18.36) (24.83, 16.90) (24.83, 14.23) (22.60, 16.90) (22.60, 14.23) (21.53, 14.23) (19.70, 14.23)

Google Docs 3 3 (28.43) (27.56) (24.90) (14.23)

. . .

27 . 2547.

1. , .

. 2553. . , .

. 2540. . : . . 2539. .

, . . 2543. . . 14: 14-

43. . 2538.

6. , .

. 2555. (Online). http://stang2.sc.mahidol.ac.th/education/English/C6.html, 10 2555.

. 2541. . , .

. 2548. 5. , .

. 2538. . : .

. 2555. . (Online). http://service.nso.go.th/nso/nsopublish/citizen/news/news_internet_teen.jsp, 9 2555.

Aaron, Lynn S. and Catherine M. Roche. 2012. Teacher, Learning, And Collaborating the Cloud: Applications of Cloud Computing for Education in Post- Secondary Institutions. Education Technology System. 40 (2): 95-111.

Chi, Ed H. 2005. Scent Highlights : Highlighting Conceptually-Related Sentences during Reading. IUI 5: 9-12.

Duchastel, P. C. 1988. "Display and Instruction Features of Instruction Tests and Computer." British Journal of Educational Technology. 19 (1): 58-65.

Gibbs, S. 2011. Google Docs Spreadsheets Gains Hidden Grid Lines (Online). http://downloadsquad.switched.com/2011/02/24/google-docs-spreadsheets-gains-hidden-grid- lines, June 24, 2011.