K BULLETIN OF THE SERBIAN GEOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY 2007. LXXXVII - . 2 YEAR 2007 TOME LXXXVII - N 2

UDC 911.37 (497.11 )

*

- -

: 52 , -, - - , : ( , ), ( ), ( ) ( ). 1879. , , , -, , - . 60- XX - ( ).

: , , , ,

Abstract: Lunica is situated in southeaster Serbia and is consists of 52 settlem. In this paper are emphasized four main stages in evolution of Lunica: initial (from the old ages until the period of Turkish rule), early stage (period of Turkish rule), central stage (from the liberation to the end of The Second World war), and modern stage that lasts for more than 50 years. The specific demographic development from the year of 1879. until modern days is denoted with changes in natural increase and migration. That is caused by the influences of the environmental factors, and also social-historic, economic, socio-psychological and other factors. Since the 60-s this territory is the good example of the area with high altitude and negative appearances in demographic development (depopulation and intensive emigration)

Key words: settlements, population, Luznica, demographic changes, transformations

,

. (1810 m), (1706 m) (1239 m), (960 m) (976 m). (39 km), () . 4253' 438' ... 2214' 2238' ... 365 m ( ), 10001200 m ( ). 350 m o 800 m, 44 (23 350600 m 21 600800 m). , - ( ). , ,

* , , , 3/3

, , , 3/3 146010, .

116

26 km , 23 km , 48 km 30 km - . , , , . ( ) , (. .) ( ) , , , , , , . ( , , , , .) , , . , . (, , , , , ) ( ) ( 13 km - ) (65,6%) . , () . , , . , 38 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , , , , , .

- 53.213 ha. 25.583 ha (48,1%), 33.685 ha (63,3%), 50.642 ha (95,2%). , 20.010 ha (37,6%), 16.799 ha (31,6%), 7.310 ha (13,7%) ( ).

, - , : , , .

, , . , , , , . , , .

, . () . ( '''')

117

, , (, ., 1986), , (, ., 1884), . ('''') , XX . , Campus belle, (, ., 1967). , ( ), ( ), , , . '' '' , , , , '' '' , , ( ) , . (, ., 2001). . , XII . . ( ), . '' '' (, ., 1967). XIV XIX . XV XV , , , 1576/77. , , , , ( ), , , , , , , , , 1606. (, ., 1979). XIX , . , , , .

. XVIII XIX , , - , ( 1890) (). ( ), . ( ) ( ). , , (XVII XVIII ) ( XIX ), . , (, , , .), 1834/35. (. , ) . . - 1877/78. , , , , , , (1879) 30% .

118

. , , , , , , , , , , , , ( , 1882), . , , , 1892/93. . 1918, . .

. 1878. 1921. ( ) , 1948. 2 . 1878. 88,5% ( 500 ), 1948. 71,2% (5002.000 ).

, . , , , . (, , .) , . , , , , .

, , , , - . 310 , 16 (49 ), , , . XIX , , , , . , 30- XX 420 . , XX , . 1926, '''' , ( '''') . , , ( 75 KW). 1934. . 1939. 19 - . , - , , 1890 , 1923. ( ), 1927. . ( 20 ) , . , . - . 1860, 1878. 1910. 18 , 1941. 24 . 1922. . 12 14 , '''',

119

. 1938. , , , , , , (, ., 1967). - , . , , . , , 1986, (609 ha) . (2 ) . 60- , . 80- (1981. 1.064 ) , . , , (2002. 888 ) . , , . , , - . . , , , , . , 1961. 83%, 2002. 13%. 60- , , 50- . , . , ( , , , , ), - ( , 20 ; 80- 21 ) . , '''' ( ), ''Lisca'' '''' ( ), '''' ( ), ''D Company'' ( ) .

-

. , (1878) 50- XX , . XX , , .

120

.

, , 1879. . XIX 1000 , 100 . XX , , 1000 (1208), (1114). 200 : (122), (123), (192), (112), (174) (186). 1900. 300 700 . XX , . , , , , .

1. 1879-2002.

1879. 1900. 1961. 2002.

I 38 13.581 15.420 23.228 12.126 II 7 3.155 3.668 5.814 1.664 III 7 1.936 112 4.361 1.894 52 18.672 19.200 33.403 15.684 : , , . XI, - , , 1882.; 1900. , . XXIII, , 1903; 1948-2002, , , . 9, , 2004.

50- XX . 26 1948. 1953. , . , , . 1961. 33.403 , 40 , 2002, 15.684 , 1879. . 1961. (1367), 200 . , , . 1948. 2002. 8 ( 762), 603 4.596 . 1961. 1981. ( 70%

,

121

), . , . , 9%, 20- , . , . , 1953. 1991. 732 483 , 2002. 886 ( 183). , , - . , , . 2002. 13 100 , 50 50 (1948. 468 ), 18 (1948. 591 ), 28 (1948. 218), 31 (1948. 332), 32 (1948. 403). 4.000 (), 5001.000 (), 500 . 60 , 591 18 ( 3,0), , 867 85 ( 9,8), , 332 31 ( 9,3) 403 32 ( 7,9). , 365 m ( ) 1200m ( ), :

600 m 23 (44,2%); 600 800 m 21 (40,3%); 800 m 8 (15,5%).

. , XIX , , , . 20- , . 60- XX , 600 m (1961. 51%, 2002. 72%) , . 600 800 m 37% 1961. 22% 2002. , 800 m 1961. 11% , 2002. 6%.

2.

( m) 1879. 1900. 1961. 2002. 600 8.593 10.493 17.056 11.361 600800 7.983 7.878 12.620 3.341 800 2.096 829 3.727 982

: 1

, , , .

, , , .

122

, 70- XX , . 1921. 3.755. 30- , 1948. 6.068 . 1971, 7.363. 1981. (7.291), 6.011, . , , . , 610 , 30 . 3 ( , , , , ) . , (, ., 1981, , 2004).

XX XXI . XX 40 50, 20 30, 20. 30- , , 30, , . , , 20 30. , 60- XX , 1116. , 7,5 60-, (, ., 1981). 2005. 7,2, XX 23,6. -16,4, (-26,4), (-24,1), (-17,6), (-16,8), (-16,7) (-16,4) . (-34,8) (-19), -17,9, -17,4. .

, , . ( , , , , , , , , .), , , , ( , , .) ( , .), ( , , ). , , , . .

XX , , , ,

123

, . , . 50- XX , : , , , . ( 60- ) , , , . - . , , , XX (, ., 1981).

, . 2002. (4575 ) 29,4% (1348 ), 70,6% (3227 ) . , 85% , 353 10% . 2002. 2% . 60- 80- , , 1981/90. 31,5% , 1971/80. 1991/2002. 23% . , 100% , . , .

. 2002. 13% 15 , 60 30,5%. . 70 , 50 11 , , , , , , , , , , 38 .

60- XX , . . 2002. 11.547, 2.806 24,3%, . 9 16.000 , , 1,5 . , , 2000. , 400.000

, , 1991-2002. .

124

. , , . , , , , , . 100 , , (, 2007.).

, . (1884). . , . (1979). , , . 8-9, . 121-175. , . (1967). . : '''' , .(1981). .

, . 11, . 57-99. , . (1986). , : , '''', 2 , . (2001). . ., . :

, '''', '' '', ( I, . 63-76) *** (1882). , (. XI). :

- *** (1900). 1900. (. XXIII). . *** (2003) 1948-2002. ,

2002. (. 9). : *** (2007) , , , :

*** (2007) 2006. : *** ,

, ,

MARIJA MARTINOVI DANICA ANTI

S u m m a r y

THE LUNICA SETTLEMENTS Geographic-Historical And Spatial-Demographic Transformation-

The development of Lunica settlements went through many geographic, historic and spatial-demographic changes. Geographical, historical and antopogeographical conditions were in favour to settlement development in antic times and middle ages, when the Lunica were first mentioned in written sources. After the liberation from the turkish rule settlements transformed considerably-demographicly (population increace etc.), fizionomicly (growing of the settlements in area), changes of property of the land etc) and funcional (decreasing of traditional, agrarian function, apperiance of the new function etc.). Today, with acctual demographic changes (redaction in rural population, increasing the urban population etc.) special equilibrium in the development of Babunica, on the one side, and the rest of the Lunica settlements on the other side, has been interrupted. Positive overall development of Babunica is primarily caused by good traffic connections, industrial development etc. The settlements, which are located in the mountains, are in the conditions of inadequate state treatment are in the stage of stagnation and demographic disapirence.