J. Math. Anal. Appl. 277 (2003) 681–688
www.elsevier.com/locate/jmaa
On some new generalized sequence spaces
Çigdem A. Bekta¸s
Department of Mathematics, Firat University, Elazig, 23119, Turkey
Received 29 January 2001
Submitted by A.C. Peterson
Abstract
In this paper we define the sequence sets�∞(u,∆2,p), c(u,∆2,p) andc0(u,∆2,p), and giveα- andβ-duals of these sets. Further we investigate matrix transformations in the spaces and give acharacterization of the class(�∞(u,∆2,p), �∞). 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
Keywords: Difference sequences;α- andβ-duals
1. Introduction
Let ω be the set of all complex sequencesx = (xk)∞k=1. We write�∞, c, c0 for the spaces
of bounded, convergent and null sequences, respectively; andcs, �1 for the spaces of con-vergent and absolutely convergent series.p = (pk)
∞k=1 will denote an arbitrary sequence
of positive real numbers.Ahmad and Mursaleen [1] defined the sequence spaces
∆X(p) = {x ∈ ω: ∆x ∈ X(p)
}where∆x = (∆xk)
∞k=1 = (xk − xk+1)
∞k=1 andX = �∞, c or c0.
Let U be the set of all sequencesu = (uk)∞k=1 such thatuk �= 0 and complex for all
k = 1,2, . . . . Throughout the paper we writewk = 1/|uk|.After Malkowsky [6] defined the sequence spaces
X(u,∆) = {x ∈ ω:
(uk(xk − xk+1)
)∞k=1 ∈ X
}whereu ∈ U andX = �∞, c or c0.
E-mail address: [email protected].
0022-247X/03/$ – see front matter 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00619-4
682 Ç.A. Bektas / J. Math. Anal. Appl. 277 (2003) 681–688
Recently Asma and Çolak [2] defined the sequence spaces
X(u,∆,p) = {x ∈ ω: (uk∆xk)
∞k=1 ∈ X(p)
}whereu ∈ U andX = �∞, c or c0.
Given an arbitrary sequencep = (pk)∞k=1 of positive real numberspk and givenu ∈ U ,
we define the sets
�∞(u,∆2,p) = {x ∈ ω: (uk∆
2xk)∞k=1 ∈ �∞(p)
},
c(u,∆2,p) = {x ∈ ω: (uk∆
2xk)∞k=1 ∈ c(p)
},
c0(u,∆2,p) = {x ∈ ω: (uk∆
2xk)∞k=1 ∈ c0(p)
}where∆2x = (∆2xk)
∞k=1 = (∆xk − ∆xk+1)
∞k=1.
We get the following sequence spaces from the above sequence spaces on givingparticular values top andu:
(i) If uk = 1 and pk = 1, then �∞(u,∆2,p) = �∞(∆2), c(u,∆2,p) = c(∆2) andc0(u,∆2,p) = c0(∆
2) (see Et [3]).(ii) If pk = 1, then�∞(u,∆2,p) = �∞(u,∆2), c(u,∆2,p) = c(u,∆2) andc0(u,∆2,p) =
c0(u,∆2) (see Mursaleen [7]).
Let us define the operatorS : �∞(u,∆2,p) → �∞(u,∆2,p) by x → Sx = (0,0, x3, x4,
. . .). It is clear thatS is a bounded linear operator on�∞(u,∆2,p) with ‖S‖ = 1. Further
S�∞(u,∆2,p) = {x = (xk): x ∈ �∞(u,∆2,p), x1 = x2 = 0
}.
Remark 1.1. [S�∞(u,∆2,p)]β = [�∞(u,∆2,p)]β .
If p = (pk) is a fixed bounded sequence of positive real numbers andu ∈ U , then�∞(u,∆2,p), c(u,∆2,p) andc0(u,∆2,p) are linear spaces, under the usual operations
x + y = (xn + yn) and αx = (αxn)
whereα is any complex number.
Theorem 1.2. Let p = (pk)∞k=1 be a bounded sequence of strictly positive real numbers
pk and u ∈ U . Then c0(u,∆2,p) is a paranormed space with paranorm g(x) =supk |uk∆
2xk|pk/M , where M = max{1,H = supk pk}. If infk pk > 0, then �∞(u,∆2,p)
and c(u,∆2,p) are paranormed spaces with the same norm as above.
The proof of this theorem is easy therefore we omit it.
2. Köthe–Toeplitz duals
Let z be any sequence and letY be any subset ofω. Then we shall write
z−1 ∗ Y = {x ∈ ω: zx = (zkxk) ∈ Y
}.
Ç.A. Bektas / J. Math. Anal. Appl. 277 (2003) 681–688 683
For any subsetX of ω, the sets
Xα =⋂x∈X
(x−1 ∗ �1) and Xβ =⋂x∈X
(x−1 ∗ cs)
are calledα- andβ-duals ofX. We shall writeXαα = (Xα)α andXββ = (Xβ)β .
Theorem 2.1. For every strictly positive sequence p = (pk), we have
(i)[�∞(u,∆2,p)
]α = M1(p) =∞⋂
N=2
{a ∈ ω:
∞∑k=1
|ak|k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
N1/pi wi < ∞}
,
(ii)[�∞(u,∆2,p)
]αα = M2(p)
=∞⋃
N=2
{a ∈ ω: sup
k�3|ak|
(k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
N1/pi wi
)−1
< ∞}
,
(iii )[c0(u,∆2,p)
]α = D1(p) =∞⋃
N=2
{a ∈ ω:
∞∑k=1
|ak|k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
N−1/pi wi < ∞}
,
(iv)[c0(u,∆2,p)
]αα = D2(p)
=∞⋂
N=2
{a ∈ ω: sup
k�3|ak|
(k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
N−1/pi wi
)−1
< ∞}
.
(We adopt the usual convention that∑m
j=1 yj = 0 (m < 1) for arbitrary yj .)
Proof. (i) Let a ∈ M1(p) andx ∈ �∞(u,∆2,p). We chooseN > max{1,supk |uk∆2xk|pk }.
Since
k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
N1/pi wi >
2∑j=1
(k − j − 1
2− j
)N1/pi wi
for arbitraryN > 1 (k = 2,3, . . .) and|∆2−jxj | � Mwj (1 � j � 2) for some constantM,a ∈ M1(p) implies
∞∑k=1
|ak|2∑
j=1
(k − j − 1
2− j
)|∆2−j xj | < ∞.
Then
∞∑k=1
|akxk| =∞∑
k=1
|ak|∣∣∣∣∣
k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
∆2xi +2∑
j=1
(−1)2−j
(k − j − 1
2− j
)∆2−j xj
∣∣∣∣∣
684 Ç.A. Bektas / J. Math. Anal. Appl. 277 (2003) 681–688
�∞∑
k=1
|ak|k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
N1/pi wi +∞∑
k=1
|ak|2∑
j=1
(k − j − 1
2− j
)|∆2−jxj |
< ∞, (1)
and so we havea ∈ [�∞(u,∆2,p)]α . ThereforeM1(p) ⊂ [�∞(u,∆2,p)]α .Conversely, leta /∈ M1(p). Then we have
∞∑k=1
|ak|k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
N1/pi wi = ∞
for some integerN > 1. We define the sequencex by
xk =k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
N1/pi wi (k = 2,3, . . .).
Then it is easy to see thatx ∈ �∞(u,∆2,p) and∑∞
k=1 |akxk| = ∞. Hence a /∈[�∞(u,∆2,p)]α .
(ii) Let a ∈ M2(p) andx ∈ [�∞(u,∆2,p)]α = M1(p), by part (i). Then for someN > 1,we have
∞∑k=3
|akxk| =∞∑
k=3
|ak|(
k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
N1/pi wi
)−1
|xk|k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
N1/pi wi
�[
supk�3
|ak|(
k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
N1/pi wi
)−1] ∞∑k=3
|xk|k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
N1/pi wi < ∞.
Conversely, leta /∈ M2(p). Then for all integersN > 1, we have
supk�3
|ak|(
k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
N1/pi wi
)−1
= ∞.
Hence there is a strictly increasing sequence(k(s)) of integersk(s) � 2 such that
|ak(s)|(
k(s)−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
s1/pi wi
)−1
> s3 (s = 2,3, . . .).
We define the sequencex by
xk ={ |ak(s)|−1 (k = k(s)),
0 (k �= k(s), s = 2,3, . . .).
Then for all integersN > 3, we have
∞∑k=1
|xk|k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
N1/pi wi �∞∑
s=3
|ak(s)|−1k(s)−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
N1/pi wi
Ç.A. Bektas / J. Math. Anal. Appl. 277 (2003) 681–688 685
�N−1∑s=3
|ak(s)|−1k(s)−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
N1/pi wi +∞∑
s=N
|ak(s)|−1k(s)−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
s1/piwi
�N−1∑s=3
|ak(s)|−1k(s)−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
N1/pi wi +∞∑
s=N
s−3 < ∞.
Hencex ∈ [�∞(u,∆2,p)]α and∑∞
k=1 |akxk| =∑∞s=1 1= ∞, a /∈ [�∞(u,∆2,p)]αα .
(iii) Let a ∈ D1(p) and x ∈ c0(u,∆2,p). Then there is an integerk0 such thatsupk>k0
|uk∆2xk|pk � N−1, whereN is the number inD1(p). We put
M := max1�k�k0
|uk∆2xk|pk , m := min
1�k�k0pk, L := (M + 1)N,
and define the sequencey by yk := xkL−1/m (k = 1,2, . . .). Then it is easy to see that
supk |uk∆2yk|pk � N−1 and, as in (1) withN replaced byN−1, we have
∞∑k=1
|akxk| = L1/m∞∑
k=1
|akyk| < ∞.
Conversely, leta /∈ D1(p). Then we can determine a strictly increasing sequence(k(s))
of integers such thatk(1) = 1 and
k(s+1)−1∑k=k(s)
|ak|k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
(s + 1)−1/piwi > 1 (s = 1,2, . . .).
We define the sequencex by
xk =s−1∑l=1
k(l+1)−1∑j=k(l)
j−1∑i=1
(l + 1)−1/pi wi +k−1∑
j=k(s)
j−1∑i=1
(s + 1)−1/piwi(k(s) � k � k(s + 1) − 1, s = 1,2, . . .
).
Then it is easy to see that|uk∆2xk|pk = 1/(s + 1) (k(s) � k � k(s + 1)− 1, s = 1,2, . . .).
Hencex ∈ c0(u,∆2,p) and∑∞
k=1 |akxk| �∑∞s=1 1= ∞, i.e.,a /∈ [c0(u,∆2,p)]α .
(iv) For N = 2,3, . . . , we put
EpN =
{a ∈ ω:
∞∑k=1
|ak|k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
N−1/pi wi < ∞}
and
FpN =
{a ∈ ω: sup
k�2|ak|
(k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
N−1/pi wi
)−1
< ∞}
.
By a well known result (cf. [5, Lemma 4(iv)]), we have to showF pN = (E
pN)α (N =
2,3, . . .). The proof of this is standard and therefore omitted.✷Now we shall give some new results:
686 Ç.A. Bektas / J. Math. Anal. Appl. 277 (2003) 681–688
Theorem 2.2. Let p = (pk) be a sequence of strictly positive real numbers. Then
(i) [c(u,∆2,p)]α = M3(p),(ii) [S�∞(u,∆2,p)]β = M∞(p),
where
M3(p) = D1(p) ∩{
a ∈ ω:∞∑
k=1
|ak|k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
wi < ∞}
,
M∞(p) =⋂
N�2
{a ∈ ω:
∞∑k=1
ak
k−1∑j=1
N1/pi wi converges and
∞∑k=1
∣∣R(2)k
∣∣N1/pk wk < ∞}
,
and R(2)k =∑∞
v=k+1 Rv , Rk =∑∞v=k+1 av .
Proof. (i) Let a ∈ M3(p) andx ∈ c(u,∆2,p). Then there is a complex numberl such that|uk∆
2xk − l|pk → 0 (k → ∞). We define the sequencey by
yk = xk − l
k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
u−1i (k = 1,2, . . .).
Theny ∈ c0(u,∆2,p) and
∞∑k=1
|akxk| �∞∑
k=1
|ak|k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
|∆2yi | +∞∑
k=1
|ak|2∑
j=1
(k − j − 1
2− j
)|∆2−jyj |
+ |l|∞∑
k=1
|ak|k−1∑j=1
j−1∑i=1
wi < ∞
by Theorem 2.1(iii) and sincea ∈ M3(p).Now leta ∈ [c(u,∆2,p)]α . Since[c(u,∆2,p)]α ⊂ [c0(u,∆2,p)]α and[c0(u,∆2,p)]α
= D1(p) by Theorem 2.1(iii), thena ∈ D1(p). If we put xk = ∑k−1j=1
∑j−1i=1 wi (k =
1,2, . . .), thenx ∈ c(u,∆2,p) and therefore∑∞
k=1 |ak|∑k−1j=1
∑j−1i=1 wi < ∞. Thusa ∈
M3(p).(ii) Let a ∈ M∞(p) and x ∈ S�∞(u,∆2,p). Then (uk∆
2xk) ∈ �∞(p) and we canchoose an integerN > max{1,supk |uk∆
2xk|pk }. Now we have
n∑k=1
akxk =n−2∑k=1
R(2)k ∆2xk − R
(2)n−1
n−2∑k=1
∆2xk + Rn
n−1∑k=1
∆xk (n = 1,2, . . .). (2)
Ç.A. Bektas / J. Math. Anal. Appl. 277 (2003) 681–688 687
Since∞∑
k=1
∣∣R(2)k
∣∣|∆2xk| �∞∑
k=1
∣∣R(2)k
∣∣N1/pkwk < ∞,
it follows that the first term on the right of (2) is absolutely convergent. Now, by Corollary 2of [4], the convergence of
∑∞k=1 ak
∑k−1j=1
∑j−1i=1 N1/pi wi implies that the second and third
terms on the right of (2) tend to zero asn → ∞. Hence∑∞
k=1 akxk is convergent for eachx ∈ S�∞(u,∆2,p), and soa ∈ [S�∞(u,∆2,p)]β .
Conversely, leta ∈ [S�∞(u,∆2,p)]β . Then, forx ∈ S�∞(u,∆2,p),∑∞
k=1 akxk is con-
vergent. Now, sincex = (xk) = (∑k−1
j=1∑j−1
i=1 N1/pi wi)∞k=1 ∈ S�∞(u,∆2,p), it follows
that∑∞
k=1 ak
∑k−1j=1
∑j−1i=1 N1/pi wi is convergent. Further, by Corollary 2 of [4], we have
that the second and third terms on the right of (2) tend to zero. Therefore,∑∞
k=1 R(2)k ∆2xk
is convergent for allx ∈ S�∞(u,∆2,p). We write
∞∑k=1
R(2)k ∆2xk =
∞∑k=1
(R
(2)k
uk
)(uk∆
2xk),
so that∑∞
k=1 |R(2)k |N1/pkwk < ∞, since(uk∆
2xk)∞k=1 ∈ �∞(p). Hencea ∈ M∞(p).
By Remark 1.1,[�∞(u,∆2,p)]β = M∞(p). ✷
3. Matrix transformations
For any complex matrixA = (ank), we shall writeAn = (ank)k for the sequence in thenth row ofA. GivenA, we define the matrixB by
bnk = ank − an+1,k (n, k = 1,2, . . .).
Let X, Y be two subsets ofω. By (X,Y ) we denote the class of all matricesA such thatthe seriesAnx = ∑∞
k=1 ankxk converges for allx ∈ X (n = 1,2, . . .) and the sequenceAx = (Anx) is in Y for all x ∈ X.
Theorem 3.1. For every strictly positive sequence p, we have A ∈ (�∞(u,∆2,p), �∞) ifand only if the following three conditions hold:
(i) (an1) and (an2) ∈ �∞(u,∆2,p);(ii)
∑∞k=1 ank
∑k−1j=1
∑j−1i=1 N1/pi wi converges for all N > 1;
(iii) (R(2)u−1) ∈ (�∞(p), �∞) where R(2) = (R(2)nk ) = (
∑∞v=k+1 Rnv) and Rnv =∑∞
i=v+1 ani .
Proof. (Necessity) LetA ∈ (�∞(u,∆2,p), �∞). Then the seriesAn(x) =∑k ankxk con-
verges for eachn andAx = (An(x)) ∈ �∞ for eachx ∈ �∞(u,∆2,p). Conditions (i) and(ii) follow easily since the sequences(1,0,0, . . .) and(0,1,0, . . .) belong to�∞(u,∆2,p).
688 Ç.A. Bektas / J. Math. Anal. Appl. 277 (2003) 681–688
Also, x = (xk) = (∑k−1
j=1∑j−1
i=1 N1/pi wi) ∈ S�∞(u,∆2,p) ⊂ �∞(u,∆2,p), and hence (ii)holds. Now, using (2), we have
An(s, x) =s−2∑k=1
R(2)nk ∆2xk − R
(2)n,s−1
s−2∑k=1
∆2xk + Rns
s−1∑k=1
∆xk.
Taking limit ass → ∞, and using condition (ii) together with Corollary 2 of [4], we have
lims→∞An(s, x) = An(x) =
∞∑k=1
R(2)nk ∆2xk =
∞∑k=1
(R
(2)nk
uk
)(uk∆
2xk).
Define the sequencey = (yk) by yk = uk∆2xk. Therefore,x ∈ �∞(u,∆2,p) implies
y ∈ �∞(p), and An(x) = Rn(y), whereR(2)u−1 = (Rn(y)), Rn(y) = ∑k(R
(2)nk /uk)yk.
HenceA ∈ (�∞(u,∆2,p), �∞) implies thatR(2)u−1 ∈ (�∞(p), �∞), i.e., condition (iii)holds.
(Sufficiency) Letx ∈ �∞(u,∆2,p). Definex = (xk) by
xk =
x1, k = 1,
x2, k = 2,
x ′k, k > 2,
wherex ′ = (x ′k) ∈ S�∞(u,∆2,p). Again, by (2) we get
An(x) = an1x1 + an2x2 +∞∑
k=1
R(2)nk ∆2x ′
k
= an1x1 + an2x2 +∞∑
k=1
(R
(2)nk
uk
)(uk∆
2x ′k
).
Therefore, by conditions (i)–(iii),Ax = (An(x)) exists andAx = R(2)u−1 = y ∈ �∞.Hencea ∈ (�∞(u,∆2,p), �∞).
This completes the proof of the theorem.✷
References
[1] Z.U. Ahmad, Mursaleen, Köthe–Toeplitz duals of some new sequence spaces and their matrix maps, Publ.Inst. Math. (Beograd) 42 (1987) 57–61.
[2] Ç. Asma, R. Çolak, On The Köthe–Toeplitz duals of some generalized sets of difference sequences,Demonstratio Math. 4 (2000) 797–803.
[3] M. Et, On some difference sequence spaces, Doga-Tr. J. Math. 17 (1993) 18–24.[4] H. Kizmaz, On certain sequence spaces, Canad. Math. Bull. 24 (1981) 169–176.[5] C.G. Lascarides, A study of certain sequence spaces of Maddox and a generalization of a theorem of Iyer,
Pacific J. Math. 38 (1971) 487–500.[6] E. Malkowsky, A note on the Köthe–Toeplitz duals of generalized sets of bounded and convergent difference
sequences, J. Anal. 4 (1996) 81–91.[7] Mursaleen, Generalized spaces of difference sequences, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 203 (1996) 738–745.