Збірник матеріалів 1 Міжнародної науково-практичної конференції

(1718 2013 , . )

2013

001:338.24

'

( 3 13.06.2013 .)

: . I

(, 1718 2013 .) /

, ..., , . . , 2013. 197 .

, . . , , .

, , , .

3 ..

!

.

, .

, , . , . , , , , , .

, .

, ' , .

, , ', , , .

!

4 ..

, . , , , , .

, . ? , , , ' , .

, . , ,

, .

, , , , . , , , .

. . . . , , .

, , , . , .

, , , .

, , , . , , , , , , . , , .

, , . , .

, , . , , , , . , : ; , . , , ?

, , , , . ? , . ? , , . , , .

5 . , . , , . . ? , , ? .

, , , :

. , , . .

. , , , . , . . , , , .

. : ? , ? .

, ?

, , . , , . , . ,, , . .

, , . ' .

. , . . , , . ? : , , , . , . .

. . , . , . ? ? . . ? , , ? , . , . , . .

..

, ' , .

, , , , , , , .

, , ,

, , , , , .

, , ,, , , , , , , , .

, , , , , , , , .

6

7 1111

, - , - . .

. , , , , .

, , - - , - . - .

. , - , , , .

This article is devoted to the formulation of the institutional planning conceptual framework. According tothe article author's point of view, implementation of suggested conceptual approach should enhance the ef-fectiveness of the state regulation of the Ukrainian national economy, raise its competitiveness and adjust

.. , , ..., ,

.. , 2013

1

the Ukrainian people living standards to the European level. Beyond this the author is talking about the roleof the Ukrainian economic science in this process.

Keywords. The system of state regulation of market economy, institutional planning, transaction costs,effectiveness of the national economy and its state regulation, the Ukrainian economic science.

. , - . , , , , , . XIX , - 2,5 . . , , , - - , , .

, , , . , . . , - , . , , . , , - . - ( - ) ..

, , , . , , , , . , , -, .

, - . , ,

. (NewYork: Norton & Company, 1981 p.). , (Cambridge University Press, 1990 p.), 1993 .

. - , , , , , , - (institutional matrix), , - , .

, , , . - . , - , .

, , , . .

, , , , , , -

8

1

, , .

. , -, -, , :

1. , , .

2. , ', - , , , , , .

3. , . . , - .

, - . , - . . , , - . - .

. , - , , , - , , , . - , , , , .

, , , , .

, . , - (transaction cost), . . - , . , . , . 4050 (, 1970 . 45 ).

, , , , / . , . , . - .

, . (path dependence). - , / . , , , , -, , , - . , , - 19902000 . ,

9

1

, , .

, , - , , - / ' , .

, , , .

: (constructivist approach) - ; (piecemeal approach) - , .

, ( , -, ) .

- , . -, .

, . , , .

, , , -, . . , . -, , , , , , , , , . , , , .

, - , , .

XXI ' ( , -) . - . , - , , , , , .

, ( !) , , , - , , - . , , , - , , , , , .

, , , - , , (, , ) , , , , .

10

1

, , ( ,' , ) .

, , , , - , . , ! -, ! , , , ( ) , , , , , .

- , . , , , , -. - .

, (, , ) - , . , , , , - . , . , , , -. , , .

, , (), , , , , Y, Z t.

() , - ( . ). (Y) - , - . Z (, ) . t - , - .

, , , , - - .

(, ,) . -

11

1.

1

, , () ().

, , - . -, ' .

, , , , ' , - , , , , - , , () .

, - , , - . , - , , , , ' , . - , , -, .

. , , - , ' ( ) , , , -, ' , , - .

, 80 ., , - . - - , . , - , . , , , , , . , , .

- , , . , . , .

- , , -, . , - , . ' -, .

1. . . .: , 1990, . 8081.

2. . . / .. . . : , 2008.

960 . ( ).

12

1

3. .. , . / . . : . : , 2007. 960 .

( ).

4. . / .. . .: , 2009. 575 .

5. . . . ., , 2002.

6. . : : . . / . . .:

, 2004. 474,[6]. (Philosophy).

7. . . , , . .: -

, 1990, . 15.

7. . . / . . . : , 2007. 832 . ( -

).

8. .. /

.. . . : , 2007. 1040 . ( ).

.. , .. , .. , 2013 13

, . - ' , - .

: , , , - , , .

-, . , .

: , , , , , - .

In materials of the article influence of science opens up on rates and quality of the economy growing of thestate, its role in forming of modern model of economy. Possibility of forming of clusters is examined as a newform of association of research structures, scientific establishments and production, in relation to develop-ment of competitiveness of economy of the state.

Keywords: cluster approach, national economy, model of government control of economy, economic po-licy, economic system, models of government control of economy.

. , , - [1].

, , - . , 1990., . -

.. , , ..., ,

, , '.

.. , ..., ,

.. , ..., . . .

1

14

, (-, , , , , ) - [7].

- .

. , ' , - . , . , . , . , . .

, . -: ' , -, , [15].

. [6, 12].

' -, , , , , ' (, , ') , , [2].

, , , . - , , , . , - , : , ; - ; [8].

- . ' - . - - .

' ., , , . -, , , - .

, , - , . , - .

.

, - .

[5]: ; ; ; .

: , ; ; ; ; . [3]:

1

15

1) ( 46 34%, 50 35%);2)

, ' ;3) . , , -

. , - , . - .

, , , - , , , - , - .

- [4]:

, ; , , - (, , ).

, , (, ).

, , , - (, , ).

, , - , , , , -, .

. , , - . , :

; ; . -

, , , , .

- , - , .

- , , , , , - , .

, . , , ( , , , ) , , - [7].

. , -. , . - , , - [11]. (, - ) . ' () ( ) [7].

1

16

, (, ), ( - , ), - ( ) [13]. , 2 ' , ( ) ,, , - . 2009 2300 , 56 - 90 . [14].

. 2010 . , . : ; ; - ; . - . , , , : ; - ; ; , , ; - , , [9].

' - . -, , - , [10].

- . , ,, , - , , - [7].

: R&D ( ) ; ; , -

. , -

. - , . , -, , [7].

, , , ( -, , , ); - - ; - ; - , -, , .

, - ' , , ' , -

1

17

- , - .

.

1. 13 1991 1977XII.

2. . ., . . : / [. . ,

..]. []. .: , 2005. 239 .

3. .., .. : . .: , 2004. 856 .

4. . . : . . .: , 2003. 504 .

5. . . . / .: , 2006. 435 c.

6. .. //

() -

/ . . 12 2001. : , 2001. . 2533.

7. / [.. , .. , .. -

. ]. []; / . . .. . : . 2012. 295 .

8. .. : / .. . .:

, 2006. . 249250.

9. [ ]. -

: http://www.psc.nas.gov/ua/ru/chronicle/ Pages/cluster_27_04_2010.aspx

10. [ ]. : http://www.ukr-

rudprom.ua/news/OSK_planiruet_sozdat_ediniy_ rossiyskoukrainskiy_ sudostroitelniy_.html.

11. .. / . . .: , 2004. 848 .

12. . , -

[ ]. : http://www.unece.org/ie/wp8/documents/voynarenko.pdf

13. .. , , -

/ .. // [ ]:

/ . . : . . .: , 201010 [ ]. :

http: //www.erej.ru/Articles/2010/Bulatov8.pdf.

14. Demuth K, Mccullough E. The longitudinal development of clasters in French / 2008 / Brown University.

15. Clusters and the New Economics of Competition / Michael E. Porter // Harvard Business Review, 1998. 621 .

. ( ,, ) . .

: , , , , , .

. (

.. , ...,

:

.. , 2013

1

, , ) . .

: , , , , , .

The methodological approaches to the assessment of public policies that support innovation wereexplored in this article. The experience of the implementation of the institutional system of state sup-port for innovation in transition economies (Russian Federation, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine) wasanalyzed. Recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of public innovation support in Ukraine wereformed.

Keywords: innovation, transition economies, government support of innovation, innovation policy, tech-nology development, high technology.

. , . 23 - , , - ' . .

, - . - . .

: - , - .

: - . [1], SIGMA ( - ) [2], [3, 4], -: . [5], . [6], . [7] .

- . [8, 9], - 2020 [10], - , [11]. . , . , . . - .

. ' : , , - . (Economics) , . (Efficiency) , - . (Effectiveness) - [12].

' , , - , , , [1]. , .

(output) - (input) , .

18

1

(outcome) (output) (input). - , .

, (.1) , . - -, , . (, , -), .

' . - , , - , [14].

, - , - , , [13, . 11].

' , . - , - , () . , - .

(. 1), [13], , - . .

- 2020, [10] [14].

19

1. : An analysis of the efficiency of public spending and national policies in the area of R&D [ ]. EuropeanCommunities, Occasional Papers 54, September 2009 : .

1

- - (), 2013 . 84 , [15]:

(intputs) 57 ' ; (outputs) 27 . 2 ()

.

: 58 79 , 72 106 - (. 3). , (17 ), , .

127 , 97 , 93 90 , .

20

-

-

- - () - -

- - ,

- - - - - () -, -

- , - - - -/

- - , - - /

- - / - -

1.

: Making public support for innovation in the EU more effective: Lessons learned from a public consultation for action atCommunity level. Brussels, 9.9.2009 SEC(2009)1197 final [ ]. Commission staff working document. : .

2013 ( 142 ) 37,2 (62) 34,6 (77) 32,7 (84) 35,8 (71)

(inputs) 43,8 (52) 39,5 (75) 40,7 (69) 37,9 (83) : 56,0 (87) 50,4 (107) 62,4 (64) 51,4 (105) 44,1 (33) 38,1 (43) 32,3 (64) 37,9 (44) 37,2 (49) 31,1 (74) 37,0 (52) 26,0 (91) 45,4 (74) 50,4 (47) 43,0 (89) 44,0 (82) 36,1 (52) 27,3 (100) 28,9 (90) 30,2 (79) (outputs) 30,6 (72) 29,8 (79) 24,7 (106) 33,7 (58) : (, ) 30,4 (48) 29,1 (54) 21,6 (92) 32,0 (45)

30,8 (101) 30,4 (102) 27,9 (116) 35,3 (81) ( - ) 0,7 (104) 0,8 (82) 0,6 (126) 0,9 (31)

2. 2013

: The Global Innovation Index 2013 World Intellectual Property Organization. 2013. C. 267. : . ( ).

1

() - . , 31 104 , 82 126 ., , , . , '

. . 2012 . 0,82% , , ' (70,1%), 8,4%.

, - : 31,9% 1990 . 11,3% 2012 .

- (. 2). , ' (), , .

- .

- [9]. ; ; -; ; ' ; ; ; .

21

3. 2013

* . .: The Global Innovation Index 2013. C. 267. : .

2013 30,6 (72) 29,8 (79) 24,7 (106) 33,7 (58)6. 30,4 (48) 29,1 (54) 21,6 (92) 32,0 (45) :

6.1. 34,6 (25) 34,1 (27) 7,1 (87) 46,9 (17)6.1.1. 1 .. * 11,3 (13) 12,6 (10) 6,7 (25) 8,0 (20)

6.1.2. , 1 . . * 0,4 (42) 0,1 (70) 0,0 (81) 0,3 (49)

6.1.3. 1 .. * 5,3 (9) 7,2 (7) 0,4 (40) 31,2 (1)

6.1.4. 1 . 10,6 (72) 7,5 (84) 1,7 (134) 14,4 (60)6.1.5. 308,0 (20) 96,0 (64) 46,0 (112) 132,0 (42)6.2. 33,0 (77) 34,1 (69) 33,1 (76) 33,5 (73)6.2.1. 1 , % 4,4 (21) 5,1 (15) 5,0 (16) 5,3 (12)6.2.2. 1 . 1564 0,8 (72) 0,9 (66) 1,6 (50) 0,6 (81)

6.2.3. , % 0,3 (45) / / 0,3 (39)6.2.4. ISO 9001 1. 5,3 (63) 1,2 (116) 2,7 (89) 3,7 (74)

6.2.5. -, % 22,3 (46) 14,5 (64) 6,8 (81) 20,8 (51)

6.3. 25,7 (68) 21,6 (94) 17,5 (115) 23,0 (89)6.3.1. % 1,6 (28) 0,4 (60) 0,0 (110) 0,6 (51)6.3.2. -, % 1,1 (75) 1,2 (73) 3,9 (46) 3,9 (45)

6.3.3. , ' , % 6,0 (72) 8,8 (48) 2,5 (111) 6,6 (64)

6.3.4. , -, % 1,6 (19) 0,1 (86) 2,4 (27) 0,1 (81)

7. 30,8 (101) 30,4 (102) 27,9 (116) 35,3 (81)

1

, , , - , -, , .

- ' , . - . -. (. Total Quality Management TQM), .

EFQM (European Framework Quality Ma-nagement) CAF (Common Assessment Framework), - [16] (. 3). - CAF , [17].

8 ' (. , 23 2013 .) CAF .

22

2. : : : Guriqbal Singh Jaiya. The Role of IP and Financial Intermediaries in EarlyStage Financing []. Policies to Address Financing and Entrepreneurial Challenges in Highgrowth Firms. Helsinki, 2 June 2010 :.

3. (CAF)

1

CAF - - , . 4 9 : ' ( ) .

CAF , .

5 - 5 ( ), - .

- . , , -. , - , -

23

:

4.

1.

, -. .

2. -

: , , , .

3. -

() ()

4.

, . () . ' . ().

5.

. .

6.

. -

7.

: ().

( , , ). .

8.

1 , .

9. -

1 . . . / /

, 5 , : 0 , 1 / , 2 , 3 , , 4 , , - , 5 , , -, , [17].

1

24

5.

1: : - . - , -

- - . 2025, - . (). -, .

- () . 20062025, - 20102020 -: , .

-, - . - 2020. (2012): - - - (), - - .

- - - . - -. - . , -, -

2: - - -: , -, , -. .

-, 3 - -. - 2020 . (2011). - 20072013 3. .

, - . -. . - 20112015.

.

- (2009) 3 (2008). -. : - -- 20102014. - - 2020 10 - .

-. 3 , . - - , (2011). . .

3. / ,

1,1% (2011)1,5% - (2009) , - - -. , ,. . - , - . 34 . - - (1994). - : 170 - (2012), 70 .

0,76% (2011)3,2% - (2011) ' , . - , - .. - . - -, - 50%(2013). ()

0,16% (2010)0,65% - . . , . - : - .. - (1997). 5 - , - (100%) - .

0,75% (2012)0,81% - (2012) . - . . 70 . 2005 .

. - . - - . , - 2013 -.

4. - , -. -. '

- , , 140, 6 (), 100 , 21 - .29 -. ,, - -. - - - - - ().

, . , ().11 - -, .. 40 - - (2010); - . .

9 , .. -. , , -. - . 6 . 4 . () - .

8 16 - ,8 -, (). - . 13 - (2012) -. ' - - . - . 14 .

1

. () , - .

, ' , - .

, - . ' , .

:1. -

CAF.2. , -

CAF, -, .

1 . White Paper of European Governance. COM(2001) Brussels. 428 final of 25.7.2001 [ ] -

:

1

12. Rebecca E. Grun. Monitoring and Evaluating Projects: A stepbystep Primer on Monitoring, Benchmarking, and Im-

pact Evaluation. The World Bank, Washington, 2006. /www.worldbank.org.

13. Making public support for innovation in the EU more effective: Lessons learned from a public consultation for action at

Community level. Brussels, 9.9.2009 SEC(2009)1197 final [ ]. Commission staff working docu-

ment. : .

14. Innovation Union Scoreboard 2011. European Union, 2012 [ ]. : .

15. The Global Innovation Index 2013 World Intellectual Property Organization. 2013. C. 267. :

.

16. EFQM Annual Report 20122013. EFQM 2012. Brussels ]. C.1113. :

http://www.efqm.org .

17. Capacities of Governance in the Czech Republic. []/ Praha: matfizpress. 2008. . 24.

26 .. , .. , 2013

.. , ..., ,

.. ,

, , . , , , - .

: , , , , , , .

, , . , , , - .

: , , , , , , .

The impact of innovation activities on economic development in Ukraine was investigated and assessed byanalyzing data of using high technologies in domestic production, financing of innovation activities and real-ization of innovative products. The proposals were provided based on the findings, including making amend-ments in legislation.

Keywords: innovation, scientific research, economic development, innovative products, high technology,technology sector, scientific activity.

. - .

. - . .

1

- .

. - ., ., ., ., .., .., .., .. .., . ., .., .., .., .., .., .., .., ., , - , - , - , , - , - , .

. , . , . , . , . , . , . -, . .

- ..

, 2012 .

: 2012 .

. .

2005 . , . -, , ', - , .

, - (Blue Sky Forum), 2006 . (. ). - () ( , - , ) , () (, , - ). - - [1].

() - , , .

. : , -

; , , -

hitech, . - , ;

, - , - .

, , , , , [2].

- -

27

1

28

, , ( ) ( )., , R& D, .

- , :

- , ,

( ) - ;

, - ( - ).

, -. , , , .

, , , - . , - , , - .

, , , 3,5%. - , 4%.

(. 1). . -

, , -

-

, , ( )

( ) i , i.

(, ) ,

, , ,

1.

: [3]

1

29

. , , ' , - , , / - [4].

. , . -, , -, , . . .

2012 571 672 2011 . - 202 (245 2011.) - (196 . 232 ). - 104 (15,5%) 2011 122 (21,4%) 2012 , (. 1).

- , , - () - (. 2).

2012 - () 14659,58 , 3665,39 . , 2011 .

- () : 2012 . 6301,52 .

1. 2011 () 2012 () ., %

2. () () 2012 (% )

1

30

(43,0% ), 2011 . 8700,27 (47,5%). - 2012 . 2011 ., - 16,6% (15,7% 2011 .) (. 2).

2012 . 42,2%. - 9,2% (. 2).

.

- 85,2% 2010 . 82,6 2012 . (. 3). - 3,0% 14,5% .

, 2012 . .

2012 1037 36,1 . . (3,3% - ).

, , - 38,08%. , 16,92%, 35,64% 9,36% (.4).

, (55% ), , .

, , - , - 10,3%, (1,0%). - 2011 ., (. 5).

. - : .

- (67,5%) (42,4%). - , - 80,5% 72,3% (. 6).

3. 20102012 . , %

1

31

2012 . 2012 2,5/. 4 / , - 3,7 /, 2,2

4. 2012 . , %

5. , %

6. , , 2012 ., %

1

32

/, 1 /. 3,4 /.

-, .

. 20102011 . - 66,3% 67,7% (. 7).

2,9% 2012 ., 2011 (3,0%).

(. 8). - , , , - .

2012 . 25,1% 2011. 23,5% 2012 .

-, 23,8% 24,3% . , - 33,6% .

, - , .

7. 20102011 .

8. 20102011 .

1

33

2012 . 332 13,4 (36,9% ) 12,6 . (29,8%) 378 2011 .

56,5% 67% (.9)., 14,9% 12,6% .

, , - 49,8% , 9,6% , 2011 .

2012 . 23,6% 22,4% .

, - , .

-/ 2 -, 2.4 % 1,2% , - (. 10).

9. 2012 . (% )

: 1 2 ,3 ,4 ,5 .

10. 2012 (% )

1

, (. 2), , , , . , - , 4 - .

. 2 (. 2).

. : , .

' - . , . .

- .

. - .

, , (. 1 .1 ).

, ' (.. 2,3 .12 ). , ' (.10, . 13 ).

, , ' - , . 13 ' - .

1. .. ,

: / .., .. .: , 2009. 276 .2. Rebecca E. Grun. Monitoring and Evaluating Projects: A stepbystep Primer on Monitoring, Benchmarking, and

Impact Evaluation. The World Bank, 2006. [ ] / : www.worldbank.org/hnppublications.3. Science and Engineering Indicators, 2008. US National Science Foundation. [ ] / :

http://www.nsf.gov/nsb 4. Innovation and the International Diffusion of Technologies and Knowledge. OECD: OECD Publishing, 2013. 20 .

34

/

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3 4 4 1 3 2 4 2 1 3 2 2 1 1 2 3 4 2 1 3 2 3 3 4 2 1 3 4 4 4 1 1

:

2.

1

35

.

: , , , , - , , .

- .

: , , , - , , , .

The state of the industry in Ukraine and fundamental principles of state industrial policy are analysed inpresent conditions of global division of labor.

Keywords: industry, competitiveness, globalization, global division of labor, integration strategy, state in-dustrial policy, effectiveness.

. , (), .

, 20 21 , .

, - , , , - - .

(), - . , , ' - , - - .

, . , - , , , , - . .

. , , - , , .

. , , , : 1) - -; 2) ; 3) -

.. , 2013

.. , ...,

1

36

, , , , .. , , , . , , , - , (1).

- , , - .

, , - :

; , ; ,

; ; , -

. : , ; -

( ), ;

, ; ; -

, - ;

;

- , .

- :

' , , ; -

, , - ;

;

; , -

, - , .

: , ( .. ) -

;

- ;

, - ;

1

37

, .

', - , , , .

-, , - .

, -, , , , , , , , , , .

- , - , , - , - .

- , - , , . , .

. , , , , , . , , , ., (2).

, - , , -, (3).

, , , -. , - , -, . ' - (4).

-, , , - ; - ; ; - , - ; ; - , .

1

38

- , - , , . 2013 (5).

, , ' - 2020 ( ).

, - , - (6).

' - - , - , .

- , ' - , - , , , - , .

, , , - - .

( - 0,47, - 0,77, 0,48) - . - 2012 27,8%, , 24,2%, - 18,7%. 24 , (7).

, , ' - ( 9 027 . . 2012 6 657 . . 2011 ), ( 10,9% - ), (8).

, ( - 80%, 40% ), - , - ', . - ( - 9 2012 42,9% ) , , 1,8% 2012 (9).

(1255 , ), , , , .

1

39

: , ,

(, 30% ); , ( -

2011 3,8% 9,4% 2000 ); ( -

1% ( 27 2011 2,03% ));

( 2011 - , 16,2% ( 18,0% 2000 ), , 12,8% 2011 ( 14,8% 2000 )). - 25% - 2014 . 50 ( 70%, 60%, , 50%. , , -, : 20% -, 25%, , 30%);

, , ' ;

, , (10).

, - , , , , , .

2020 , - , ' .

- , ' - - - . - (, , ), - .

(: 60 . . -, , -, , . . - DEFI Composite, - :, , . , , , - . , -, . 2006 , . , -. - , -). . , -

1

40

2020 , 2020 , - 20102014 (11).

' : -

, , ; , -

;

;

- ;

- , - ;

() , , (, );

- , - ; ;

, , , ;

, , , , ;

, - ;

, , - , , , .

, , , - , () - ' , :

, -

, -

, ' . , , -

, , .

, , - , - , , :

2,02,2% 2013 2020 ; 50%

2015 ; , 25 % 2014 ; , , :

1

(510%), ( - 1015%);

, 2015 99,5 ;

2015 710 .

, 2015 - 9,69 . .

, - , 3% .

, , - , , , ' .

. - - - (12).

- 20132014 , , -, (13).

, , .

, .

', - , .

1. .., .., .. : -

, , // . .: , 2012. . 10 11.

2. .. // . .: -

, 2008. . 5 6.

3. .., .., .. // ( .

. ..). : , 2012, . 8.

4. .. -

// , 2010, 4, . 7 9 .

5. 27

2013 [ ]. :http://www.kmu.gov.ua/control/publish/article?art_id=246103087.

6. -

2020 [ ]. -

:http://www.me.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=198188&cat_id=3286.

7. [ ]. :

http://www.me.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=198188&cat_id=3286.

8. [ ]. :

http://www.kmu.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=246247059&cat_id=244203594.

41

1

42 .. , 2013

.

: , ,

.

: , ,

The article deals with topical issues of state sector management, and suggestions about existing model ofgovernance change in respect to international experience are made.

Key words: mechanism, management, state sector

. - . , - ( , -), .

. ' - , . (, , '), - ' , .

- .

. , - 70 - - , - , (, ). , - , , . , - , , -

9. [ ]. :

http://www.kmu.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=246247059&cat_id=244203594.

10. [ ]. :

http://www.me.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=198188&cat_id=3286

11. [ ]. :

http://www.me.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=198188&cat_id=3286

12. 17 2013 . -

[ ]. : htpp: // www. President.gov.ua/new

s 26603.html.

13. 20132014 [ ]. -

: http://www.kmu.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=246247059&cat_id=244203594.

.. , ..., ,

1

, ' - .

, . (, , ), (, -); (), - (, ). (, ), - (, ). , , . , , . , - , , - [1,2]. , , , , .

: - , . - , . , - () , . - . , - , .

, . ' - -, . , - (, - , ).

:, , - ; - , - ; , '- , - ; , ' , ( , -), , - ; , ( -, ) ' , .

' - , - , , - . , (, , ) ( - ). , , , , , , , -, ,

43

1

44

(, ). , - , , .

, , - , -, . , - , ' , - ' .

( 2010.) - ' , - . , , , [4]. , , - ; ' , - . , ' .

:

- ( ' );

' ' ( , );

(, , - , - , -, ' ; , - , (-, ); , - , () ( );

, - ' ' , (, ).

: , -

, ; -

; , . , ' -

(, ), -, . - . - , - , .

, ,

1

45

, - .

, - . -, , , - ', - (, , , , - ), , (, ).

, - , - :

:

; , , , ;

( , , , - 25%);

' ; : ,

-, , ;

' :

;

;

, , - ;

() : ,

, , ; - ; ;

, - , ' , ;

' - :

, , - ;

; -

, , , -, ;

, , ' - - .

1

. : ; - ; - ' , - .

-, , , , - ' ;, , - .

, - ( ) -, .

1. .. :

. WP1/2003/04 .: , 2003. 36 .

2. .. : , , . .: , 2005. 645.

3. . . : : . , .

/ . .,2000. 235.

4. . . ( ): . .

. . . : . 08.00.04 / . .: , 2011. 19.

5. OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of Stateowned Enterprises. Paris. 2005.

46 .. , .. , .. , .. , 2013

- . - , , , . - .

: ; ; ; ; .

- . , - , , , . - .

: ; -; ; .

.. , , ..., ,

.. , .. ,

.. , .. ,

.. ,

1

47

In the article questions are examined in relation to practical experience of input of mechanisms of sti-mulation of socioeconomic development of regions in Ukraine. Conducted analysis of results of inputboth traditional mechanisms government control socioeconomic processes on territories and new in-struments of development of regions, and also problems that arose up in the process of their application.The worked out suggestions are in relation to the increase of efficiency of mechanisms of stimulation ofregional development.

. . - , ' - , - .

, ' , - 2015 . - .

.

. - , . . [1, 2], . . [2, 3], - . . [2; 3], . . [4], . . [5], . . [6, 7], . . [8], . .[9], . . [10], . , - - , 2015 .

- .

. 2005 . - . [11] , - , , , , , , , .

: 21.06.2006 1001

2015 [12] ( 2015); , ,

2015 2020 . . 2015 ,

, .

2015 : ; ; ; . 2015 : ; ; ; . 16 2011 -

, [13].

1

48

- 05.09.2012 827 [14] . ' .

2015 , - .

2015 - 2008 2011 . [15] , - . , , , , , , :

, ;

; -

, ; . , -

, . [16]: . , -

- , ;

. - 2015 , , - ' ( , - ).

, , , - . , (, , -, , , ) 2015 2008 , 2010 , 2011 , - 21 2006 1001 [12] ' .

[11] - . - , 2015 [17] . - - .

16.11.2011 1187 , [18].

, . , , , - .

., -

15.09.2007. 20082011 - 4 13 , 51 .

, - , .

1

49

, 51 13 12, ( ) 16 , 12 .

2012 (, , ) (- 25,3% 31,2%) ( 10,8% 31,2%), ( 0,9% 23,5%, 141%). - 76,4%, (76,4%) (72%) .

, , , .

[16]: ,

; '; , -

- . , , - , - , ;

-, .

. - 1990 . -. 19971999 . ' : - , 19992000 , 2001 , . 19972000 , - . 2010 , - 19982010 ., - 19982005 ., - 19982002 , 19992010 .

, . - (- 19% 82%), ( 5% 87%), . [19]. , .

, , - ( - . , 2004 2010 ., 2017 .). - , . - 2015 . , .

, - , , - ' 2004 2010 . ( ). - ', , , , , , , . - 2 : 20042007

1

50

., 20082010 . . - 25.06.2008 580 , - 2011 . [20].

, , , , - .

2004 2011 . 6 420 502,5 . ., 748 972,1 . ., 74 453,5 . ., 5 597 076,9 . .

1 2012 . 95 , 2004 2011 ., - 43 , 2 , 38 , 12 , :

10 ' , 1 ' '- ( . 540 ), 1 ' ( . ). - 50 , 45 .

272 725,252 . . (32,3% ), 228 282,65 . . (30,5%), 29 100,78 .. (39,1%), 1 815 341,832 . . (32,4%). ( -) , , , [21].

- . , ( ) - . . . ', . , , , . . - . , , . . - . , , , - 50 . : , .

, - , - .

, , , - , - . , , - . , - .

- , , , , -, , -, .

, 2003 ., . - .

, . , - ( 1,3 2009 . 27,4 2006 .), - ' ( 18 20092010 . 69 2004 .).

1

, ', , , , . - ', , '- .

, , - . - .

, , - , - , .

, ' ; - ; - ; . ' - , -: ', - , ' ' .

. , - , . ' .

, , : - , , ', , , , , ( ' , - , ). - .

', - , , ', .

51

:

,

'

,,

,. .

,..

,.

% ,..

,.

% ,..

,.

%

2003 55,91 5,27 20 9,4 0,46 14 8,6 0,23 1 49,42004 72,22 10,60 69 14,7 2,11 64 19,9 0,88 2 41,52005 117,39 17,65 20 15,0 1,22 12 6,9 0,82 2 66,92006 140,20 14,16 44 10 3,87 28 27,4 1,90 3 492007 174,63 24,06 50 13,8 6,24 37 25,9 2,20 3 35,32008 253,21 32,34 52 12,8 5,79 41 24,0 1,78 2 22,92009 274,16 27,26 18 9,9 0,35 8 1,3 0,00 0 02010 307,75 38,37 18 12,5 2,57 10 6,7 0,00 0 02011 342,69 48,78 50 14,2 7,77 39 15,9 4,56 3 58,72012 413,61 65,32 38 15,8 7,38 25 11,3 5,01 2 67,92013 412,06 61,55 27 14,9 4,69 12 7,6 3,73 2 79,5

1. , 20032013 .

1

52

, , .

12 2012 . - , - () [22]. - . , () , . , - .

. -: , - () , , , , (- , , ).

, , - (), : 70% - , , 30% , , 75% . 2012 . - , (), - , 01.01.2013 [23].

, : , -

; , -

; -

' ' ; (), -

; , -

; ( , , -

(' ), - , , ).

: 5 . () ,

, 1 . . , - , - :

(), . , 20% , ;

(), . , 10%;

(), - , , ', - , , , 5%.

1

53

() - . , , , - , , . , .

23.01.2013 30 , (), , , (-) , 5 1 , , ' ( , , ), 1 0,2 [24]. - ', .

, 2012 . . 3 - 2012 1 641 450 . . 21.03.2012 312 2012 . - , , [25]:

() , , 2015 ., - 21.07.2006 1001, - :

; ; ; , -

( , , , - ).

' , 2012 . - , 25.04.2012 243 [26]. , , , [27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33]. - (2 ), , (2 ),, , (2 ), , (2 ), (2 -), (2 ) .

523 (), 2012 . 204 , 98 ', 25 , 55 - 8 , 95 ' , -. ', , , , - , .

, 2012 . , - , , , , ' - .

. - ( , , ) .

, .

, - , , , ,

1

54

, , - , - .

, - ', .

2015 .

- .

, .

-, - , .

:

;

, , , , ;

' - ;

, ' ;

- ;

, , ;

-, - , .

1. . . : , , : / . . -

: ', 2008. 528 .

2. . . : / . . , . . ,

. . : ', 2006. 220 .

3. . . / . . , . . -

// . . . . . 6 (24). . 2. : , 2009. . 2843.

4. . . : . / . . . : , 2002. 346 .

5. . . / . . //

' -

. ( -

). ': 2006, 2010. . 270273.

6. .. ( )

/ .. // (, , ): . . / . . .. . .,

2010. 2. .17.

1

55

7. : . / . .. .

.: , 2011. . 41 42.

8. . . / .., .. //

. . . . -

7 (25). .4. .: . . ..., . . , 2010. . 2536.

9. . []: . . / . . [ .]. .: ,

2006. 328 .

10. : , , : / .. ,

.. , .. , .. . , . : -

, 2011. . 622.

11. ( 2850V 08.09.2005, 02.12.2012,

546317) : [ ] // : http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/285015

12.

2015 (1001 21.07.2006, , 02.12.2011, 11902011) : [-

] // : http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/10012006%D0%BF

13. , -

(1186 16.11.2011). [ ]. :

http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/11862011%D0%BF

14.

(827 05.09.2012 , 1033

19.12.2012). [ ]. : http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/8272012%D0%BF

15.

10 : ():21(1)12 / (21(1)12) / -

; . .. , .. -

, .. ; .: .. , .. , .. . 2012. 362 . 0112U005758.

16.

10 : ():21(1)12 / (21(1)12) / -

; . .. , .. -

, .. ; .: .. , .. , .. . 2012. 362 . 0112U005758.

17.

2015 (1001 21.07.2006, , 02.12.2011, 11902011) : [-

] // : http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/10012006%D0%BF

18. , -

(1187 1611.2011) : [ ] //

: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/11872011%D0%BF

19. .. : , , . . .: , 2013. 408 .

20. -

' 20042010 (580 25.06.2008) : [ ]. :

http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/5802008%D0%BF

21. : [ ]. -

: http://www.me.gov.ua/

22.

( 4318VI 12.01.2012) [ ]. : http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/431817

23. (656

04.07.2012, , 25.01.2013, 302013) [ ]. :

http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/ 6562012%D0%BF

24. 5 , -

(),

(30 23.01.2013) ) [ ]. : http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/

302013%D0%BF

25. 2012 -

( 312 21.03.2012, , 30.052012,

4412012) [ ]. : http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3122012%D0%BF

1

26. ' ,

2012 (243 25.04.2012, ,

05.12.2012, 9892012) [ ]. : http://zakon2.ra-

da.gov.ua/laws/show/2432012

27. ' ,

2012 (461 25.06.2012) [ -

]. : http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4612012%D1%80

28. ' ,

2012 ( 551 23.07.2012) [ -


29. ' ,

2012 (660 15.08.2012) [ -


30. ' ,

2012 (752 01.10.2012) [ -


31. ' ,

2012 (798 17.10.2012) [ -


32. ' ,

2012 ( 869 07.11.2012) [ -


33. ' ,

2012 (989 05.12.2012) [ -

]. : http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/9892012

56 .. , 2013

336.153.11:332.1.. ,

..., ,

- . .

. , , , -, .

- . - .

. , , , -, .

In the article essence of influence of process of is examined on innovative developmentof economy of regions. Properties of forming of regional institutional environment and feature of institutio-nal transformations are analysed in a period economic transformation.

Keywords. Institutional environment, innovative politics, economy of region, infrastructure, innovative strategy.

. , . - , . -

1

, , . , - . - , - , . , , , , - - , , .

. - , , - .

, , . - . , , , - . . ; , , , - , - . . , , - . - , , - . , . ' - '. , . - . . - . , , - . , - .

, - XXI - . - . , , , . - , ( , , - ). , - , ; - , , - .

, (), , , .

57

1

; - ; - . - (, , ), ( , , ) - , . -, . - , .

- ; ; - ' , ; - ; . - -. - , . - - . , , , -, .

, - . - ( ). ' - -, . ; , , ; - .

' - , , - . - , , . - . - , - , . , . , .

- - ' . , , - . - -, .

58

1

59

, , - . , - ' ' . - , ' . , , -. - , - . - . , - . '- - .

, - , , , , , ( ) - , . ' - . -, ' - . , - . , .

- . , ' , ' - , . - - , - , , -, . - - , , , , . - , - .

, - , , :

-'; , , - ;

; , ,

, ; , -

; , -

;

1

60

, - ;

, - , .

, ( ), (, ), , - . - . , - , , , , , - ' . - , , , , - , .

', - . - . , , :

; ; , (

' ); ; ; ; .. -

. , - . , - , . ; - , , - . , . - , , - ; -, , , - .

1. . , . .: , 2000198 .

2. . ( , , ,

). .: 1982. 455 .

3. .. XX . : . .: , 2006 512 .

4. 2010 2020 (

). : http://kno.rada.gov.iia/komosviti/control/uk/publish/article7art/

5. . : / . // .

2010. .. 7381

1

, . , -, .

: , , .

- , . -, , - .

: , , .

The paper analyzes the domestic markets of hightech products based on the comparison of data on out-put, exports and imports. Named the most promising, according to the authors, hightech industrial sec-tors in terms of increasing production capacity and improving the trade balance.

Keywords: domestic hightech products market, hightech production, export and import of hightechproducts.

. - , -. , , [1], [2] .

. , , , . , - , - [3]. [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] - , - , - . , - () .

- .

, , , - , . , , , - . , , , - . , , . -, .

.. , .. , .. , .. , 2013 61

.. , ..., . . .

.. , ..., , ,

.. ,

..., . . . .. ,

:

1

, , , - [9].

. , () ' , [10]. - () [11]. - () [12]. () - [13].

, , -, ( ) . - , - .

, . ( ) - [14]. - .

, , - . (.), , , , - [15].

, . ' 2 . 2007 2,8 . 2011 . 20072011 286 581 . . 2011 (1 . ), ' (775 . ), - (683 . ), (516 . ).

, ., : - [17]. , -

62

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

44,5 47,1 40,1 55,3 44,6 655,5 819,3 800,2 855,7 1090,8

421,9 236,7 478,9 542,8 752,6 135,8 90,7 72,8 74,9 170,7

' 35,7 43,9 29,0 42,8 52,2 191,8 523,6 107,8 444,6 827,0

111,1 130,5 124,3 140,3 176,7 526,8 602,8 310,0 384,6 569,1

6,5 11,3 10,4 11,0 30,3 56,2 75,5 33,4 43,6 64,3

154,7 243,7 344,4 224,7 272,2 619,8 825,7 568,4 676,5 788,5

123,7 95,5 45,8 90,0 336,8 725,4 836,1 525,2 775,1 1019,6

898,1 808,6 1073,0 1106,8 1665,4 2911,2 3773,7 2417,9 3255,1 4530,0

1. 20072011 , ( . .)

. [16].

1

. , - , .

, - , . , - . - .

- , [9].

, . , -

. 20072011 ( ) 78% 422 753 . . , -, 26% ( 171 . ). . , , 2007 48,5% 50,5% , 2011 31%, 68%.

: 50% 23%. . , -, ' . - , 60% , -, 7,5 60 . .

. , 200 . . , , , , [9]. , - . - . , , - . . ( . . -), : , , . , , - . - .

, -, . - . -. : 2,5 20072010 . , : 2007 620 . , 2011 800 . ( 7%). - ii () (600 . ). , , -, , , , , -. 2011 30 . , 5 2010 . , : - 2 10 . - 5 .

, , . -

63

1

, , , - 9001000 . .

' , - . - . ' 2010 . - - , .

, ' , 30%.

, 500 . , ' . - ', 2011 400 . . - , - 55% 20082011 ., , 2633% . , - , . 2007 - 45 . ( 100 ), 2011 72 . ( 11 ). - . 2007 9 . 12 - , 2011 80 . , ? - . , , . - , 20072011 . 2 , - 14 . , : - .

, 750800 . , - , , .

, , , . ( 20082009 ), - ( 90 336 . 20092010) 2011 650 . .

( - 85% 2011 , 294 . ), - . - , , - .

i , . , , 90% 2011. , , .

, , , . 8 . - , , - . , -

64

1

640 . 2011 . - , 1,4 . .

. 2007 6,5 . , 56,2 . ( - ). 2011 , 64,3 . , 30,3 . ( 2:1). , - 2011 ii , 20072010 . , - , .

, . 20072010 64,7% 46% - , 2011 80%. - , 19 . , 62% 2011 .

, ( , - , , , ii ). , .

- 100 . , - , , .

, ' , - , . 2009 , -, , , '- 10% , 27 . . , , ., 2011 ii 12 . , 190 . . , - , . - . 2007 - 19 , 3,26 . , - 50,5 . 135,8 . . -, 23 . 2007 2010 . 2008 2009 . - , 20072010 . - , . - .

20072010 . , , - . ( 10% 20072010 .), , , . - ( 65 105 .), ( 2045 2356 .). , 2008 5683 - , . , 24 ., 14 20 . 20092011 .

, 500 . . , - , .

, , - 20072011 . 2100 . -

65

1

, ' . 2008 - 17%. , -, .

, . , - , 2010 2007 . . , - , - . , , , , , , .

, 20072010 . -. , 5 . -, 3035%. 20072010 . 24 32% . , - , - , .

' 2010 4645 , 40% . 1,21,3 . . - , : , ; - ( ); ; ; , , - .

. , , - . , , - .

/ , - , . , , , (, , ). , - .

- , , - , , . ().

, , , . , - ( 100 ). - - , , . - , , , - .

, - 10 - . , .

66

1

1. 12.09.2012 1130

[ ] : http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/

11302011.

2. 27.02.2013 . 187 -

20132014 [ ] : http://zakon2.ra-

da.gov.ua/laws/show/1872013.

3. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2012. OECD: Paris, 2012. 176 p.

4. . . : /

. . , . . // . 2010. 2. . 7288.

5. . . : : [] / . . // ; -

. . . ; c -

. . : , 2008. 290 c.

6. . . :

/ . . , . . , . . . // . 2008. 1.

. 7179.

7. . . : / -

// ; . ., 2009. 304 .

8. C. [ ] /

C. , . . . :

http://old.niss.gov.ua/Monitor/March08/11.htm.

9.

: () : 2(1)12 / -

; . . . ; . . . , . . , . . . 2012. 270 .

0112U005163.

10. [ ] / .

: http://ukrstat.gov.ua/klasf/klasif/kved_.rar.

11. [ ] / .

: http://ukrstat.gov.ua/klasf/klasif/npp_2011.rar.

12. [ ] / .

: http://ukrstat.gov.ua/klasf/klasif/csk.rar.

13. [ ] / -

. : http://ukrstat.gov.ua/klasf/klasif/uktzed_2011.rar.

14. -

: () : 0911 /

; . . . ; . . . , . . , . . . 2011. 446 .

0111U003940.

15. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2007. Innovation and performance in the global economy [-

]. : http://www.oecdilibrary.org/docserver/download/fulltext/9207081e.pdf?.expi-

res=1283854521&id=0000&accname=guest&checksum=D3AD41456FE7902B66BEEAD92B2658D1.

16. [ ] /

. : http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/.

17. 17.09.1992 2614XII [ ]. -

: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/261412.

67

1

- . - . - .

: , , - , , .

- . - - . .

: , , - , , .

This article describes the conceptual approach of building the organizational and economic model of infor-mationanalytical framework for regional development. Given the nature of qualitative and quantitative cha-racteristics of the information model and formulated the laws under the influence of which it operates. Pro-posed organizational and economic model of informationanalytical framework for regional development.

Keywords: information and analytical framework, information model, organizational and economic model,region, regional development.

. , , - . . , , .

, , - . , , , ,, , , . , - .

. - , . [2], -' . . [3], . . [4], . . [5], . . [6], . . [7], - . . [8], . . [9], . [10], . . [11].

, , - , , ' -

68 .. , 2013

.. , ..., ,

1

. - . ' .

. - , ' .

-. , , :

1. .2. -

.3. .4. .5. ,

, .6. . , , . , :1. .2. .3. .4. . :1. ' ( ).2. .3. .4. . :

. -

. . , . : ' ; ; ; (-

) ; , . .

' ' , - .

: ' ,

; ,

;

, , [1, . 42].

, , , , . , -

69

1

, , . - , , - .

, , :1. .2. .3. .4. ' .5. .6. .7. .8. . -

. - .

-. , - .

' , , , .

- .

, .

- () .

- .

: ; ; ; ; ; . ', ' . -

, - .

, , ', , .

. - , - , ' ' . , - , , .

, , , .

' . ' , -, , , , ,

70

1

, . , ' ' . - , - , , ' .

, :

; ; , -

, ; , -

; () . '

, - . , , ' , -, (. 1).

, 1, : , , , -; , - .

, - - .

, - . , , - ' ( - '), , , - . - - . - .

(. 2.).

71

1.

1

, -, , - .

, - , . - , - , . , , , , - .

' - , , , , , .

-, : , -.

. . - - , , , . -, , - ( - , .)

, . , : , -, , ; - . : ; . - , , . - , , -, .

- . :

72

2.

1

: , . - : , - ; . , (. 3).

, - - . - , , .

, . - . , , , : ; - ; .

, ' , , - . , . , , - - . , , - .

, (. 4).

, -

73

3.

4.

1

, , 5.

- , - .

- . - . , ,' .

. - , - : , - ; - ; , ' .

, , ' - .

1. . . / . . , . . , . . , . . . :

, , 2003. 204 .

2. . : [ ] / . // -

. 2008. 5. . 4752.

74

5.

1

3. . .

/ . . // , . . -

.. .; 1718 2005 . 2005. . 136142.

4. . .

/ . . // . 2002. 10. . 2419.

5. . . / . . -

, . . , . . // . 2007. . 1. . 3539.

6. . . : [, , ] /

. . . : . 2007. 71 .

7. . . : . [ ]. : www.poli-

tik.org.ua/vid/magcontent.

8. . . / . . //

. : , , 2007. 360 .

9. . . / . . , . . . .: . ., 2001. 343 .

10. . : [ ] /

. // . 2007. 8. . 3945.

11. . . / . . . ., 2007. 401 .

.. , 2013 75

.. ,...,

(),

. -, , . - . .

: , , , , , - , , , .

(), . - , , - . - . .

: , , , , -, , , , - .

The InputOutput Tables, recounted to the comparable prices, are meant as an informational database inthe given article. Data of these tables represent a range of macroeconomical indicators; it is possible to es-

1

timate from different sides the current state of economics and to predict its further development, madethem more correct and realistic. This information may be used as an efficient tool for the effective manage-ment of economical processes in Ukraine. It was introduced a methodological approach and algorithm of re-calculation of InputOutput Tables to the prices of the base year.

Keywords: informational database, management of economic processes, method InputOutput Tab-les, criteria for evaluation of efficiency, structural changes in the economy of Ukraine, the structural para-meters of the economics, macrostructural intersectorial models, algorithm, factor of dynamic model.

. , - . . , , , , , , , - , . , . . - , .

. - . [3], . [3],. [3]. , , . - () . - . - ' . . [2], . . - [4], . [7], . . [1], . . [1], . . [10], . . - [7]. . . [5], , , , ; , - , - . - , . . [3], . . [3], . . [5], . . [8], . - [7], . . [9] . , , - , - . - - .

-, .

. . - - , - ( ') , , , - ( ) : ; -; .

, - , , , , . - .

76

1

, ( ). ` , - , . , - .

, .

.

, . - .

, ( -, ). . - , , . - , .

2 . :

:

X0 , - ;

X1 , ( ) ; Ipi ( i ). : :) (

);) ( );) ( ), : ( ).

: ( ). -

: : i ( -

0102, (05), 40.140.3, 41 F(45), G(5052), H(55), 6063, 64, J(6567), 70, 7174, L(75),M(80), N(85), 9093);

i ( 10.12, 11, CB(13.14),DA(15.16), BD(17.18), DC(19), DD(20), DE(21.22), 23.1, 23.2, 23.3, DG(24), DH(25), DI(26), DJ(2728),DKDM(2935), DN(3637));

;

;

( 0102,(05), 40.140.3, 41 F(45), G(5052), H(55), 6063, 64, J(6567), 70, 7174, L(75), M(80), N(85), 9093);

77

1

( 10.12, 11, CB(13.14), DA(15.16),BD(17.18), DC(19), DD(20), DE(21.22), 23.1, 23.2, 23.3, DG(24), DH(25), DI(26), DJ(2728), DK,DM(2935), DN(36,37)) ;

10.12, 11, CB(13.14), DA(15.16), BD(17.18), DC(19), DD(20), DE(21.22), 23.1,23.2, 23.3, DG(24), DH(25), DI(26), DJ(2728), DK, DM(2935), DN(36,37) - : ,

:

; ;

. , ,

:

: i ( - 0102, B(05), 40.140.3, 41 F(45), G(5052), H(55), 6063, 64, J(6567), 70, 7174, L(75),M(80), N(85), 9093);


i ( , DA(15.16), D(17.18), D(19),H(55), 6063, 64, M(80), N(85));


;

;

;

;

( 0102,(05), 40.140.3, 41 F(45), G(5052), H(55), 6063, 64, J(6567), 70, 7174, L(75), M(80), N(85), 9093);

( 10.12, 11, CB(13.14), DA(15.16),BD(17.18), DC(19), DD(20), DE(21.22), 23.1, 23.2, 23.3, DG(24), DH(25), DI(26), DJ(2728), DK,DM(2935), DN(36,37)) ( 3.33.5);

: ( 0102, (05), 40.140.3, 41 F(45), G(5052), H(55), 6063, 64, J(6567), 70, 7174, L(75),M(80), N(85), 9093);

( 10.12, 11, CB(13.14), DA(15.16),BD(17.18), DC(19), DD(20), DE(21.22), 23.1, 23.2, 23.3, DG(24), DH(25), DI(26), DJ(2728), DK,DM(2935), DN(36,37)) ( 3.33.5).

78

1

. , :

; , ; . -

. , -

: :

. -

:

;

;

.

. , : :

( 0102,(05), 40.140.3, 41 F(45), G(5052), H(55), 6063, 64, J(6567), 70, 7174, L(75), M(80), N(85),9093);

( 10.12, 11, CB(13.14), DA(15.16),BD(17.18), DC(19), DD(20), DE(21.22), 23.1, 23.2, 23.3, DG(24), DH(25), DI(26), DJ(2728), DK,DM(2935), DN(36,37)) ;

: ( 0102, (05), 40.140.3, 41 F(45), G(5052), H(55), 6063, 64, J(6567), 70, 7174, L(75),M(80), N(85), 9093);

( 10.12, 11, CB(13.14), DA(15.16),BD(17.18), DC(19), DD(20), DE(21.22), 23.1, 23.2, 23.3, DG(24), DH(25), DI(26), DJ(2728), DK,DM(2935), DN(36,37)) ( 3.33.5).

- :

(.1).. ;. :2.1. : ;2.1.1. :2.1.2. : : ; : ; : ;2.2. : ;2.3. : ;2.4 .I. :3.1. : ;3.2 : ;3.4. : ; 3.5. : ;3.4. : .

79

1

82

1.

.

1

V. ' .

- ' :

, - .

.

. -, 20102014. -, , . .

1. . . / . . , . . -

. .: , 1968. 357 .

2. .. : . . .

. / .. ., 1974.

3. : / [ . ., . .,

. . .] ; . . . . . .: . .; , 2003. 1008 .

4. . . / . . .: , 1969.

5. . . : [ ]: [] /

. . : , 1999. 74 . : http://okrussia.na-

rod.ru/stat/sodmono.htm

6. . . [ ]: [] / . .

: , 2001. : http://okrussia.narod.ru/stat/sodmono3.htm

7. . / . // . 2003.

10. . 2940.

8. / [ . ., . .,

. . .]; . ... . . . .: , 2007. 520 .

9. .. : . ... .

. : 08.07.01 / /

. ., 2004. 181 .

10. . . ( ) /

. . .: , 1966. 376 .

.. , 2013 83

330.3.. ,

:

-

2 : . ' - .

1

: , , -, ' , - , , .

: , , - , , -, .

- 2 : - . . : , - , , - , - , , .

: , , - , -, , .

The article discusses approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of institutions and institutional mecha-nisms for regulating investment activities on the basis of 2 methods: correlation and regression analysis,using international indices. The first method determined the relationship between institutional arrange-ments and uncertainties and the level of investment security. The second method consists of two stages:review of the implementation of integrated indicators that measure the quality of the institutional environ-ment and economic development are calculated by international organizations, internationally recognizedindices that are most closely related to the growth rate of capital investment in Ukraine and countries clas-sified by the World Bank to one group in terms of development, such as Georgia, Moldova.

Keywords: institutional units, ensure the investment, government regulation of investment, institutionalmechanisms of state regulation, governmental instability indicators, integrated indices.

. , -, . - - , - .

- . , - . , - , , , , - [1]. , .

, - . , , , - .

- .

. , -

84

1

: . [2], [3] [4], [5], [6],. [7], [8] .

: . [9], . [10], . [10], . [11] .

- .

. [12], . [13], .. - .. [14]. . [15], . . [16], .. [17], .. [18] .

, - , (, , ) , .

. , ' , -, , .

, , - ( '), - ' , , ( ' ).

, , , ' .

, - , ' .

, ' ' - , ' .

- . :

' - ;

, . -

.

[2, 3, 4 ] , - : -, , .

, .

- , . . , , -, .

, ' . -

, , , . , , ,

, .

85

1

, - ( ., , ), (., , ).

- , - . .

-. , . [2] ( ) ( ) . , [3, 5, 6] , (, ), , . , - .

. [7] -, , .

. [8] , 3000 58 , , . - , (Inst), , - , , , :

(1) Invest 19841993 .;Inst ;GDPbase 19841993 .;Secbase , , 1985 .;Govaver

19841993 .;Trdaver , -

19841993 .Inf 19841993 . , , -

5 :1. : , -

, - .

2. ' : - , .

3. : , - .

4. : - .

5. : .

- (Inst) (Credibility).

, ( ) - - 71% . , , , . ,

86

1

, , , , , . , - , , . , , , .

, .

, . [19].

- , , - . , , , -. .

, , .. -, .

- .

, ,, , , - . , - . , - , .

, , : (Doing Business), , .

1 185 . - , . 10 , . - - 5 10: , , , -, , , -, , , -. , . [20] ' - .

, - .

2013 . 15 - ( 62 ), ( 17 ), ( 16 ). ( 6 ), ( 3 ), ( 5 ) (.1). , , , . [21]

[22] - (The Property Rights Alliance), , , -.

:

1. : , - , ,

2. : , , .

87

1

3. : , , . , , , , , , .

2012 . 118 130 , , 117 2011 , (. 2).

, Wall Street Journal Heritage Foun-dation 1995 . 2010 2011 179 -, 2013 . 185 [ ]. , 185 : -, , , , , , , , , . 100 - , 0 .

Heritage Foundation - , , .

10 , . : 80100; 7079,9; 6069,9; - 5059,9; 049,9.

2013 . 46,3 100 (. 3), - 0,2 . 43 , - , . 59,6 . 2009 49 , 2010 46 , .

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2008 139 109 174 138 68 141 177 120 46 1402009 145 128 179 140 28 142 180 131 49 1432010 142 134 181 141 30 109 181 139 43 1452011 145 118 179 164 32 109 181 139 43 1502012 152 112 180 166 24 111 181 140 44 1562013 137 50 183 149 23 117 165 145 42 157

2008 18 10 11 11 48 33 102 64 42 1052009 15 4 10 2 28 38 110 81 43 922010 11 5 7 2 30 41 64 30 41 952011 12 8 7 2 15 20 61 35 41 1052012 16 7 4 1 8 17 42 54 41 1092013 9 7 3 1 4 19 33 38 30 81

2008 92 81 153 46 97 98 111 122 17 882009 103 89 158 50 84 104 123 135 17 882010 94 77 161 17 87 109 101 140 22 902011 90 94 159 18 89 109 106 141 20 922012 81 88 164 18 40 11 83 134 26 912013 83 92 168 16 40 82 109 142 26 91

88

1. , 20082013 .

: . . : http://www.doingbusi-ness.org/reports/globalreports/

-

-

2007 3,4 2,7 3,6 3,92008 4,3 3,9 4,8 4,32009 4,2 3,7 4,8 4,32010 4,1 3,7 4,8 3,92011 4,0 3,5 4,4 4,22012 4,0 3,6 4,3 4,2

2010 3,7 3,7 5,8 1,82011 4,1 4,1 6 2,32012 4,3 4,4 6,1 2,3

2007 3,9 3,3 4,9 3,62008 3,4 3,3 5 3,72009 3,6 3,5 5 2,22010 4,4 3,8 5,2 4,12011 3,9 3,7 5,6 2,32012 5 4,1 5,8 5,1

1

-, . , - . - , , , .

- . , - , 10 , , , - 48,5% , , - , , . .

Building Institutions for Markets [24] - , ' , - ' . (Worldwide Press Freedom Index) . (Reporters Without Borders), , .

, , (Freedom of Expression Exchange Network, IFEX), - , , - .

, , , - , , .

43 , - , (, -, ) (, , , -), , ,

89

2. , 20072012 .

: . [ ] / : http://www.international-propertyrightsindex.org/profile?location=moldova

1

(, , ), - .. [25].

2002 . 139 . 2010 . - . 20122013 . , - .. (. 4). - TVi 26 2013 . , . - .

[ ] - (, , ).

() () ()2005 112 99 742006 105 89 852007 92 66 812008 87 120 982009 90 81 1142010 131 100 752011 116 105 532012 116 105 532013 126 100 55

90

3. , , 20072013

4. , 20072013

-

-

-

2013 46.3 30.0 23.0 78.2 29.4 47.6 49.9 71.0 84.4 20.0 30.02012 46.1 30.0 24.0 78.2 29.4 46.2 51.2 67.7 84.4 20.0 30.02011 45.8 30.0 22.0 77.3 32.9 47.1 50.0 63.2 85.2 20.0 30.02010 46.4 30.0 25.0 77.9 41.1 38.7 57.7 61.2 82.6 20.0 30.02009 48.8 30.0 27.0 77.0 39.0 40.5 52.4 68.1 84.0 30.0 40.02008 51.0 30.0 28.0 79.0 43.0 44.4 53.1 69.9 82.2 30.0 50.02007 51.5 30.0 26.0 83.6 53.2 43.6 52.8 68.4 77.2 30.0 50.0

2013 72.2 45.0 41.0 88.2 68.9 90.6 91.1 72.6 89.2 75.0 60.02012 69.4 40.0 38.0 87.8 55.8 86.9 92.1 74.4 89.2 70.0 60.02011 70.4 40.0 41.0 87.5 60.3 87.3 92.1 76.7 89.2 70.0 60.02010 70.4 40.0 39.0 89.1 65.3 87.9 93.7 70.2 89.1 70.0 60.02009 69.8 35.0 34.0 86.8 74.6 86.6 99.4 70.9 80.6 70.0 60.02008 69.2 35.0 28.0 90.7 81.2 85.0 100.0 71.4 71.0 70.0 60.02007 69.3 30.0 23.0 91.2 88.4 80.8 99.9 77.8 71.8 60.0 70.0

2013 55.5 40.0 29.0 87.2 50.1 69.7 40.9 73.4 80.0 35.0 50.02012 54.4 40.0 29.0 86.5 38.7 70.0 41.7 74.4 79.0 35.0 50.02011 55.7 40.0 33.0 85.6 48.1 69.5 39.0 77.0 80.2 35.0 50.02010 53.7 40.0 29.0 85.1 43.0 70.2 42.7 67.5 79.9 30.0 50.02009 54.9 40.0 28.0 85.3 51.3 70.1 45.1 67.6 81.6 30.0 50.02008 57.9 50.0 32.0 83.0 56.9 69.3 60.7 67.6 79.2 30.0 50.02007 58.7 50.0 29.0 85.6 62.8 68.1 64.4 68.0 79.4 30.0 50.0

: : Index of Economic Freedom. :http://www.heritage.org/index/explore?view=byregioncountryyear

: PRESS FREEDOM INDEX. [ ] / : http://en.rsf.org/

1

, , - () [ ]. 2012 . - .

, - , .

' ( 0,66), - (0,74), (0,62) (0,69) , - (0,61 0,55 ). , - .

, : - ' ( 0,7) ( 0,61) . ( 0,53), (0,51) (0,52). , , .

, ( - 0,74) ( 0,74). - ( 0,63), ( 0,57), ( 0,48) ( 0,48). .

. , , , - .

, , . -, .

, , - .

. , .

1. .. / . // -

. 1994. 12. . 56.

2. Barro Robert Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries / Robert Barro // Quarterly Journal of Economics,

1991. 106. . 407443

3. Knack S. Institutions and Economic Performance: CrossCountry Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures /

S. Knack, P. Keefer // Economics and Politics, 1995. 7, p. 209.

4. Keefer Ph. Why Don't Poor Countries Catch Up? A CrossNational Test of Institutional Explonation / Ph. Keefer and

S. Knack // Econ. Inquiry, 1997. 35. . 590602.

5. Clague Ch. Institutions and Economic Development: Growth and Governance in LessDeveloped and PostSocialist

Countries / Ch. Clague. Baltimore and London: John Hopkins University press, 1997. 408 . [ ] /

: http://econweb.umd.edu/~murrell/articles/Institutions%20and%20economicdevelopment1.pdf

6. SalaiMartin X. I Just Ran Two Million Regressions / X. SalaiMartin // American Economic Review, 1997.

87. . 178183. [ ] / : http://faculty.lebow.drexel.edu/LainczC/cal38/

Growth/SalaiMartin_1997.pdf

91

1

7. Mauro P. Corruption and Growth / . Mauro // Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995. 110(3). . 681712.

8. Brunetti Aymo Economic Growth with 'Incredible' Rules Evidence from a World Wide Private Sector Survey / Aymo

Brunetti, Gregory Kisunko and Beatrice Weder. Switzerland. Basel: University of Basel, 1997. 40 . [ -

] / : http://elibrary.worldbank.org/docserver/download/1760.pdf?expires=1365932080&id=

id&accname=guest&checksum=DCABB0B8F55B3921EB66DB0ACA53CD88

9. ., ., . . -

. .: , 2002. 144 c.

10. ., ., ., ., . -

( 1995 2000 .). .: , 2001 110c.

11. ., ., . // -

, 2000. 1. . 11.

12. Williamson O. The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. The Journal of Economic Literature

Vol. XXXVIII (September 2000) pp. 595613.

13. North, D.C. and J.J. Wallis. Integrating Institutional Change and Technical Change in Economic History. A Transaction

Cost Approach // Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Econoics. V. 150. 4. Dec. 1994. P. 609624.

14. .. -

/ .. , .. // . 2010. .

20.3. . 186191.

15. .. / .. // .

1997. 7. . 4351.

16. . . /

.. // , 2012. 1. (13). . 2530.

17. .. /

.. // , 2011. 1 (10). . 275279.

18. .. : / .. -

// , . 2009. 2(14). . 224234.

20. Murrell P., ed. Assessing the value of law in the transition countries / . Murrell, ed. Michigan: Michigan University

Press, 2001.

21. Kandilov Ivan T. Trade Liberalization and Investment: Firmlevel Evidence from Mexico / Ivan T. Kandilov and Asl? Leb-

lebicio?lu // World Bank Econ Rev, 2012. 26(2). . 320349.

22. Country and Lending Groups. [ ] / : http://data.worldbank.org/about/coun-

tryclassifications/countryandlendinggroups#Lower_middle_income

23. The International Property Right Index/ [ ] / : http://www.internationalproper-

tyrightsindex.org/ Index of Economic Freedom. [ ] / : http://www.heritage.org/in-

dex/about

24. WDR 2002: Building Institutions for Markets. [ ] / : http://wdronline.worl-

dbank.org//worldbank/a/c.html/development_economics_decades/chapter_2_freeing_world_poverty/inside_se-

archresult/page/4

25. . [ ] / :

http://gtmarket.ru/ratings/worldwidepressfreedomindex/info

26. : -

: . ., 2002

27. SME Policy Monitor in the Western Balkans, Turkey and Eastern Partnership Countries. [ ] / -

: http://www.ebrdblog.com/wordpress/2012/12/smepolicymonitorinthewesternbalkanstur-

keyandeasternpartnershipcountries/.

92

1

, . - .

: , , , , , .

, . -- - .

: , , , , , - .

Essence of the socially oriented investment projects is considered in the article, certainly them the personaltouches and spheres of realization. Expediency of the use of the priority-normative going is reasonable near anevaluation and selection of the socially oriented investment projects for a grant to them of state support.

Keywords: social investments, investment project, an investment project, state support, norms, priori-ty-normative approach.

' -. , -, . , - , ( ) . , , - . , - ', -. , , ' - ( ), ( ).

, ' , - , . ' - - , - , [1]. - , [2], ' [3], [4]. . , , . - , , ', , - [5]. , , . (, , , , ), , , -

.. , .. , .. , 2013 93

.. , ..., ,

.. , ..., , ,

,.. ,

..., ,

1

, . , - , [2].

Education

Збірник матеріалів 1 Міжнародної науково-практичної конференції