-

" 2011

2

gusts :

CFD Ensembles Numerical site calibration

3

A BgustsCDWAsPE FCFD

4

.

" , , .

. -30 , )boundary layer

meteorology( . .

, , . ,

. CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) , RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes),

.

, , . ,

) ( . . ,

. .

, .

.

RANS , , -CFD OpenFOAM .

, ) .( -CFD .

, . .

: , , , ' . : , , ,

' .

.

, " . , )

(. .

. .

. " Actuator Disk . ,

. , . .

, .

5

,

) 1( .

1 - 1995-2009 (Kaldellis 2011)

1

, 1973.

, " " Pacific Northwest Laboratory " Riso National

Laboratory . , - )siting handbooks .(

-80 , . , ,

. , ,

. WAsP )Wind Atlas analysis and Application Program ( .

-90 , , . .

. , .

) (,

, . , , )complex terrain – -( .

, -WAsP. , .

6

.

, Navier-Stokes ) CFD – Computational Fluid

Dynamics(, Reynolds time-averaged Navier-Stokes equations )RANS () state of the art2(, Large Eddy Simulations (LES) .

, .

. , .

LIDAR )LIght Detection And Ranging (-SODAR) SOnic Detection And Ranging( , )data

assimilation ( , .

. )Actuator disk (

. -CFD .

-CFD . .

. ) wind farm layout

optimization ( , . -1994 , ,

. , : ,

)decommissioning( '. -NPV)Net Present Value ( ,

. - .

, ) RANS( . ,

. CFD , .

, . -CFD ) ( ,

.

. ,

.

, , .

, . .

–

1. – -200 , .

7

2. - , .

3. – " , .

4. – .

".

:Petersen et al 1998a,b 3,4 )

.(Petersen -Wind power meteorology) ( ,

. .

Sumner et al. 2010 5 -CFD . Probst et al. 2010 6

. )

(.

, windenergyresearch.org 7 "

Risø . ) , , , ( ,

" P.E. Réthoré Risø.

) Wind power meteorology( . " "

. ) (

. . )siting .( siting

, ) , .( -micro-

siting , . -micro siting.

) .( )boundary layer meteorology (

. , .

, -90 . , ,

. .

8

2 - )edu.vsc.lsc.apollo://http/(

) boundary layer 2( -100 , -2

. )surface layer ( ,10% , .

) 8 , )1 ( , ( ,

-1 " .

. , .

, )climatology .( :

, , ,: , ,

, , , , .

, . .

. [ ]P W ,

[ / ]V m s 3[ / ]kg m:

)1( 32

12

WV

mP

, 9,10 . Reanalysis NCEP-NCAR " ) A (

) , , , , ' ( , , 11 -250 "

6 .

. wind climatological fingerprint) (12 -3 : , ,

. , 3 .

9

3 - -3 ) .a ( )b (

)c ( . )E. Petersen 1989(

c3 , . Weibull , " :

)2( 1

1·( ) ; 1

kk x

Ap u e U Ak u

A A k

( )p u u ,k -shape parameter -A -scale

parameter) U , (. 4 .

WaSP " Weibull , .

10

4 - )a ( Weibull 1000 .(b)

Weibull . )E. Petersen 1989(

. .

, -10 . 12 30% . 11

22 , 45 , -13% . ,

20 . .

20 , )standard deviation( -10% . ,

.

. 20 , .

, 1-3 . 5 , 20 . ,

3 )( . , . "

-20 10%± . " 3 , -4%±13 . , ,

, 6,14,15. measure-correlate-predict ,MCP .

5 - malin head

) a ( ) b( 3 . EWEA 13

11

,

. :

1.

2.

3. ) micro siting(

, :

)1 ( 250 " Reanalysis 16,17.

)2 ( ) . (.

)3 ( .

3 A Reanalysis .

,

" .

, , 18,19.

, , 10-60 . " )3(:

)3(

1 1

2 2

aU z z

=U z z

1U z - 2U z 1z -2z ,a , 0.14a )

" (" . )3( -a , ) 2.8( )3( . a6

. – , – /U z . – – .

2.8 18 . ) – wind shear (

(wind veer). 6b . .

6b , )30 ( , . ,

, -30 ) b6 4.5 .(

12

6 - (a) , .

30 , ) .((b) ) ,

Norrekaer Enge wind farm , .( 30 . )E. Petersen 1989(

, ) 2.7(.

. 7 .

7 - )upwind ( (crest) , )two dimensional ridge .()E. Petersen 1989(

gusts uI , u 10-60 , :

)4( /u uI U

, ) ( .

) 2.7( , . uI : )grassland (13% , 8% ,

20% .

13

-1994 Hojstrup 20 . uI , .

, ; 25% )moderately unstable .(

, ) (21 .

, .

, . ,

, B . C.

) ( .

. , " " . ,

– . 10-200 ,

12 :

)roughness( ) ,

( ) , ( , .

. , ) " "

, " (.

)obstacles( , , . " , .

)orography( ,

– .

, 12 . .

2.7.1 – , ,

, " ) roughness length(22. " – , , –

, ) , ( , , . .

, , , , , 22,23 " .

. ) (24 ,

14

22 . .

, 6,14 . , ,

. )roughness rose( ,

25. , WaSP

. CFD )law of the wall ( , 26 .

) ( )( . .

2.7.2 )sheltering ( , ,

. , . 12 .

, 5, : , . 27 , CFD 5.

2.7.3 )terrain orography ( , .

" , )contour lines .( " 12,28 x,y z . ,

, DTM ,digital terrain model , raster map . ,

-DTM .

: , - 8 . . " " .

-0.3) -17 (29 , . ,

28. , .

) ( .

15

8 - )landscape(

12 . ) ( ) ( "

. ) ( . ) ( )CFD (/ " .

-0.3 . , . "

.

" ) "complex terrain ( ) ( . ,

" ." IEC 61400-12 ", complex terrain is defined as that terrain surrounding the site

that features significant variations in topography and terrain obstacles that may cause flow distortion ." ,

. " " , - ,

. . , -2008, )GWEA (',

-60% , 30,31.

-RIX ,ruggedness index 32 , , 0.329 .-RIX

, . 8 RIX=0%

) 8( , -10% ) 8 ( 10-50% ) 8 .( -RIX

WAsP D , .

: , , , -3

) ( . . 7 " " 7 : , ,3

16

) Navier-Stokes( . . , . 1 " . , -1 "

. , . , ,

". ) 3 .( "

.

, :

)boundary layer 2( .

: , , . – , , .

. )

-10 , adiabatic lapse rate .( – )air parcel ( 1h 2h ,

-2 1h h , ) ( ) ( , 2 1h h . ) , ( ,

)stratification ( . – . 11,18 :

)5( *

0

lnu z

U z = z

0.4 ,0z - )thermal stability ( . 0 .

– z , 0z *u . ,

. , 3.4 - 7.1.

. ,

) -free atmosphere 2( . , .

)G( . , .

: " ) ( . ,

, 33,34, )6(:

)6( 2

* *ln 2

0

u uG = A + B

fz

17

)geostrophic drag law( ,-f ) 1/s( ,A,B .

. " ) (34:

)7( 1 · p

f nG

,p

n

.

" ) .( )5(

)6( . , . , ,

.

, )synoptic changes ,

-1000 " ( ) ( . , , . , " .

11 .

, , ,

. .

Reanalysis . .

.

, , .

, )NWP – Numerical Weather Prediction ( /

. - 25 " 9000 35 -European Center for Medium Range

Weather Forecast ,ECMWF.

)

( 10-2000 " , mesoscale .

, -10 " , microscale models , WAsP CFD .

-mesoscale models ) ,

CFD " 23,36,37 , mesoscale 38( .

18

, mesoscale ,

Reanalysis . microscale . -microscale ,

. downscaling 33 . -mesoscale -microscale " data

assimilation , Reanalysis mesoscale 23,36.

3.4 -6. -mesoscle , , E . microscale , -mesoscale , microscale .

-

microscale , 28,32,39 . WAsP

, . D.

CFD CFD – Computational Fluid Dynamics ,

" . , .

, RANS –

Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes 40, :

)8( · 0U

)9( 1· ·

UUU p f

t

U

,p )modified mean pressure (- .f

) , .( )Reynolds stress tensor ( ,

) viscous stress terms.(

)turbulence closure ( Boussinesq linear isotropic eddy-viscocity :

)10( 2 t S

S , t. -1972 " Jones and Launder 41

2 k .

)11( · · tk

k

kkU k P

t

19

)12( 2

1 2· · tkPU C C

t k k

2k tP S 2

t

kC

. 1, , , ,kC C C

.

, . RANS

)DNS – Direct Numerical Simulation.(

1, , , ,kC C C . Jones and Launder41 " Launder -free shear flows 42.

, Launder .Detering and Etling 43 C

.Apsley and Castro 44 . Crespo et al 45 Panofsky and Dutton 46.

Richards and Hoxey 47 . :

)13( 2

2 1( ) CC C

)5( ) ( ) 0 (,

)14( -)15( , k .

)5( *

0

lnu z

U z = z

)14( 2*

( )u

kC

z

)15( 3*

( )u

zz

C -C , 1C )13( .El Kasmi and Masson 48 k RNG .

) ( , " Boussinesq , . k -49.

F , LES )Large Eddy Simulation ( . -LES

. RANS LES .

3.4.1 ,

.

20

: 50 , . -20 20 "26. ,

. " Rossby ,

URo

Lf )f ,U -L (.

Rossby -1 . 2f sin , -5 17.2921·10 s . ) 33o(,

7.5 10 " , 9.5Ro , .

: )inflow( , )outflow( , , .

)inflow( )5( , mesoscale . " Wyngard 51 3.3 .

wall functions, Couette 50. , )outflow ( , . ., "

50 , )( , , )0

k

z

u (48

47,52 .

, 50 . ,Brodaur and Masson 200852

.

.

, 50,53 . ,

6 .

3.4.2 .

, . , , data assimilation .

, 0( , , )·( )UG j k Ui , )forcing(

0U ,-( , , )G i j k nudging coefficient nudging method . -nudging coefficient

) G , " ( .

, – – ,

. mesoscale Reanalysis, . CFD -microscale " -nudging Acusolve . downscaling

WRF) Weather Research and Forecasting model( 54 ,

21

WRF Acusolve . , " WRF.

3.4.3 -Ensemblesensemble forecasting 55,56 ,

. , ) ( , ) ,

( , . . Perira et al 2010 57 RANS WAsP ,

.

3.4.4 - site calibrationNumerical

IEC 61400-12-1 , - , site calibration ,

. " )

.( " . numerical site calibration , CFD .

CFD , 5.2 .

,

, .

,

)hub height ( )-Kw Mw .( ,

: , , ) IEC-61400-12-1 .( .

, " , ) 9( , "

0 1( )i if V V V , 1

1( ( [ ]() )

2)i iPP P V wV k ,

) 8760( , 58 . "" , .

,AEP) Annual Energy Production(

)16( 1

1 0 11

1( ( ) ( ))· ( )·8760

2

N

i i i i

i

AEP V Vkwh

P V P V f Vyear

22

9 - .

)bins ( )IEC 61400-12-1( . ,: ,

, ) – upflow ( , ,

59,60 . . , . ) 9 (

)concave ( )cut in ( )7-8 ( , )-55 ( )convex .(

, . ,

– , , . " Sheinman and Rosen 61–64

-bins , -AEP 10% .Sheinman and Rosen

. , - , 65–68 .

)Markovian process ( 69,70. Sumner and Masson 59,60

, " .

, . 5% IEC 61400-12-1.

,

)15 ( 9 , 68.

) BE – Blade Element(. .

. .

" " , . 71 , .

)Actuator disk .(

23

72 . ) (

. . .

. )( 72 . , 73 .

lifting line lifting surface . , , .

, )free-wake .( .

Jukowski )lifting line ( )lifting surface.(

CFD , , . .

, 74. -CFD .

CFD -CFD . . . -CFD 74,75 . )Actuator surface (

)Actuator line(, – , .

. CFD , .

CFD , . ,

, .

. 5,75–78 . .

. , . 10 .

10 – ) ( , )AD( ,

)AL ( )AS( 75

, . .

)1-2 ( . 75,78,79 . )kinematic model( -self similarity 80–82 . -WAsP.

.

24

79 ) 11( . . 12

. , , 10-20

) 12 -13(. , )wakes ( , 83–86.

11 - 79

12 - actuator disk ) ( ) ( ,

actuator line) ( ) .( z

75) . z x d(

4.1 . .

IEC 61400-1 )classes ( , , .

) ( .

25

13 - Ud , Uref , )D ,x/D (

50

12 , Actuator disk RANS . Actuator disk -5 , -2

. Actuator disk RANS , .

,

, . .

, )wake .(

, . self similarity

, .

-17 , ,

. ) ( ,

-gradient decent . 87. , ) ( ,

. Mosetti et al -1994 88 , . " , )

Mosetti ( . 89–102.

26

. . Wan et al 2010 103 -

particle swarm optimization , -Pont and Cagan 2010 104 )pattern search algorithm .(

, 105,106 . one way coupling , ,

.

, )VLM – Vortex Lattice Method( . 107 . -two way coupling

, . ) WindPro,

openWind, windFarmer( 108,109 . .

)recirculation ( , . , , , , . .

" Navier Stokes .

CFD , WindSim 110 CENER 111. -CFD

) one way coupling( . 82 , WindPro 108,

openWind 109 .

, -20112008 TOPFARM ) Risø( , ,

. 112–114. TOPFARM

, , .

WAUDIT " CENER -2010 115 - . )

TPWind ,European Wind Energy Technology Platform ( -3%) 30% .( -48 , , ,

. CFD , 40% .

, -75% .

. .

- 116 .

0.5-1 " 117 . " CFD , RANS 2 k .

27

, , 113) one way coupling( .

, RANS 118 . -CFD

, )buoyancy ( 5. -inflow – " ) .(

, ) (.

Castro and Santos 2010 119 meso-microscale , -mesoscale ,

. ) -44% -13% -mesoscale.( ,Castro and Santos -time

series -mesoscale CFD , " .

.Palma et al. 2008 120 )WAsP ( CFD) RANS (

.Palma et al. " , , .

, .Palma et al. CFD

. Milashuk et al. 2011 121 RANS , , WindSIM

, . Milashuk et al. -numerical site calibration )" -12 9 .(

-Anderson-Darling test of normality 12 , ,

. -RANS ,

.Prospathopoulos et al 2008 50 , RANS Askervian hill –

122 - – . Matsushita 2010 123 -RIAM-COMPACT , CFD

LES Kyushu , 124 .Matushita Numerical Site Calibration (NSC) - ,

. Brodeur and Masson 200852 -RANS NSC - .

CFD . Fluent, Acusolve " , Windsim, Meteodyne, Windie . )open

source (OpenFOAM RANS 26 , Bolund 125 .OpenFOAM 74,126,127.

- 116,117 , .Lackner et al 2007 128 MCP) Measure-Correlate-Predict ( 3 – ,

, . Lackner et al 129

28

. MCP ,

. , Lidar -Sodar . ,

) – ( .

,

. CFD WaSP , .

, .

, 116 , .

, .

, , . 2.7.3 ,

" " , - , , 30,31.

CFD , .

CFD , , . ,: ,

. ,

.

, . :

, CFD, . ,

.

-CFD OpenFOAM ,

, . ,

. , .

. . , ,

. .

RANS , -nudging 36.

. .

, ,

29

14. ) ( , , .

– , LiDAR SoDAR , .

. two way coupling , . ,

-actuator disks.

) ( .

130 . , ,49,131 Froude 86,87 , , .

mesoscale , , .

. ,

. ) .(

.

,

) ( -) .(

Navier-Stokes )CFD( , : , 131 . " ,

, , Bouland 2,132. , .

, .

: : .

, . , ) , (.

: (discretization) (cells) . . 5-50

. . 125,132,133 ,

30 53.

: , RANS 2 ,

LES . RANS LES 125,133 . RANS .

5,48 . , -k -

30

RNG k . , ) 3.3 .(

86,87, .

: . ) k- ( , , )

2 ( , ,48,52,53,120,123,134,135 . ,

- " . " – , , –

, , 50. H , L1 -L2 ,

L1, L2 , H 26,48,125,136,137.

, 138. ,

)static pressure contours ( , 137 .

50.

: , . ,

139. .

, : , . , . .

/ 139. :

z0 . )wall functions( ,

) , .( . .

, 136,140 .

, . .

: .

. -nudging . , Schneiderbauer & Pirker141 .

, ) 142(, . -ensamble55–57

.

. . . : ,

, , .

31

. ,

, , " " .

.

Davenport – : , , ) ,

( . Wieringa22 , -6% .

, . .

, . , – . )

( .

, ) ( , " ." , ,

.131 LiDAR Light Detection and Ranging) ( SoDAR ( Sound Detection and Ranging)

. , . .

, . .

: , .

) ( ) .( ,

- CFD 14 . ) ( .

141 . nudging )data assimilation( 143 " " .

, ,

. )1 2,h h( 3h) 41( ,

. , .

, UPWIND 135 . , , .

) , .( ,LiDAR SoDAR.

. The Bolund experiment 132 . .

, , , -

32

Lackner et al. 2007 128. )CFD ( . . .

14 - h1 -h2 , .

. " , "

LiDAR SoDAR . , 131. , .

, ,

. , 78,135,144 . ) near wake(

: , . )far wake – - 1-2 (

, .

, ,

. Actuator disk -Actuator line/surface) 10.(

-Actuator disk -2 , -far-wake . Actuator disk-

, . .Actuator disk , 82 .

. , .

. ,

)16( 9 , 61 .

145,146 60 . , . ,

. ,

33

. , ,

.

. .

) ( (recirculation) )wind shear(.

, . ) (

)wind veer .(

-CFD .

. , .

.

. : , , .

. .

, - . ,

. .

. .

, . .

, ) .(

) ( . .

CFD

) ( . ,

) .( .

, . . : , ,

, ' . : , , , '.

34

. , , . -CFD

.

-CFD . . .

.

-CFD , . .

. : , , .

) kWh .( : , , .

. ) .(

, .

35

1. Kaldellis J, Zafirakis D. The wind energy (r) evolution: A short review of a long history. Renewable Energy. 2011;36(7):1887-1901.

2. Bechmann A, Sørensen NN, Berg J, Mann J, Réthoré P-E. The Bolund Experiment, Part II: Blind Comparison of Microscale Flow Models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 2011. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/3wyk86l. Accessed August 18, 2011.

3. Petersen E, Mortensen N, Landberg L, Højstrup J, Frank H. Wind power meteorology. Part I: climate and turbulence. Wind Energy. 1998;1(1):25-45.

4. Petersen E, Mortensen N, Landberg L, Højstrup J, Frank H. Wind power meteorology. Part II: siting and models. Wind Energy. 1998;1(2):55-72.

5. Sumner J, Sibuet Watters C, Masson C. CFD in Wind Energy: The Virtual, Multiscale Wind Tunnel. Energies. 2010;3(5):989-1013.

6. Probst O, Cardenas D. State of the Art and Trends in Wind Resource Assessment. Energies. 2010;3(6):1087-1141.

7. Anon. State of the Art in Wind Farm Layout Optimization | Wind Energy Research. Available at: http://windenergyresearch.org/2010/10/state-of-the-art-in-wind-farm-layout-optimization/. Accessed August 18, 2011.

8. Burton T, Sharpe D, Jenkins N, Bossanyi E. Wind Energy Handbook. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2001.

9. World Meteorological Organization. Meteorological Aspects of the Utilization of Wind as an Energy Source. WMO, Geneva; 1981.

10. Landsberg H E., Wallen CC. World Survey of Climatology. 1965.

11. Petersen EL, Troen I, Frandsen S, Hedegaard K. Danish Windatlas. A rational method of wind energy siting. 1981.

12. Petersen EL, Troen I. European wind atlas. Roskilde: Risø National Laboratory; 1989.

13. EWEA. The annual variability of wind speed. Available at: http://www.wind-energy-the-facts.org/en/part-i-technology/chapter-2-wind-resource-estimation/local-wind-resource-assessment-and-energy-analysis/the-annual-variability-of-wind-speed.html. Accessed August 22, 2011.

14. Lackner M, Rogers A, Manwell J. Uncertainty analysis in MCP-based wind resource assessment and energy production estimation. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering. 2008;130(3):031006.

15. Rogers A, Rogers J, Manwell J. Comparison of the performance of four measure-correlate-predict algorithms. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. 2005;93(3):243-264.

36

16. Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, et al. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 1996;77(3):437-471.

17. Gibson J, Fiorino M, Hernandez A. The ECMWF 40 year re-analysis (ERA-40) project—Plans and current status. The 10th Symposium on Global Change Studies. 1999.

18. Monin AS, Yaglom AM. Statistical Hydrodynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 1975.

19. Mortensen NG. Flow-response Characteristics of the Kaijo Denki Omni-directional Sonic Anemometer. Roskilde: Risø National Laboratory; 1994.

20. Højstrup J. The turbulent wind field in various terrain types and in windfarms. In: Hamburg: DTU, Denmark; 1994:3-15.

21. Larsen SE, Olesen HR, Højstrup J. Parametrization of the low frequency part of spectra of horizontal velocity components in the stable surface boundary layer. In: J.C.R. Hunt (ed.), Turbulence and diffusion in stable environments. Clarendon: Oxford; 1985:181-204.

22. Wieringa J. New revision of Davenport Roughness Classification. In: Proc., 3EACWE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.; 2001.

23. Al-Yahyai S, Charabi Y, Gastli A. Review of the use of Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) Models for wind energy assessment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2010;14(9):3192-3198.

24. Ramli NI, Ali MI, Saad MS., Majid TA. Estimation of the Roughness Length (z0) in Malaysia using Satellite Image. Wind Engineering. 2009. Available at: http://www.iawe.org/Proceedings/7APCWE/T2D_1.pdf.

25. Mortensen NG, Landberg L, Troen I, Petersen EL. Wind atlas analysis and application program (WAsP). vol 2: User’s Guide. Roskilde: Risø National Laboratory; 1993.

26. Xabier pedruelo tapia. Modelling of wind flow over complex terrain using OpenFoam. 2009:1-115.

27. Taylor PA, Salmon JR. A Model for the Correction of Surface Wind Data for Sheltering by Upwind Obstacles. J. Appl. Meteor. 1993;32(11):1683-1694.

28. Walmsley JL, Troen I, Lalas DP, Mason PJ. Surface-layer flow in complex terrain: Comparison of models and full-scale observations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 1990;52(3):259-281.

29. Wood N. The onset of separation in neutral, turbulent flow over hills. Boundary-Layer Meteorology. 1995. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/index/V2412RH223072568.pdf.

30. Postech, Kier. Introductory note IEA R&D Wind – 61st Topical Expert Meeting. S. Korea; 2010. Available at: http://www.ieawind.org/Task_11/TopicalExpert/61/Introductory_Note_Complex 20Terrain.doc.

37

31. Rodrigo J, Avia F. Summary of IEA R&D Wind – 61st Topical Expert Meeting. Postech, S. Korea; 2010.

32. Bowen A. Exploring the limits of WAsP: the wind atlas analysis and application program. Proceedings of the 1996 European Union Wind Energy Conference. 1996.

33. Csanady GT. On the Resistance Law of a Turbulent Ekman Layer. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences. 1967;24:467–471.

34. Holton JR. An introduction to dynamic meteorology. Academic press; 2004.

35. Anon. ECMWF Supercomputer History. Available at: http://www.ecmwf.int/services/computing/overview/supercomputer_history.html.

36. Yamada T. Downscaling mesoscale meteorological models for computational wind engineering applications. The Fifth International Symposium on Computational Wind Engineering (CWE2010), Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, May. 2010:23-37.

37. Marti I, San Isidro M, Cabezon D. Wind power prediction in complex terrain: from the synoptic scale to the local scale. Torque from Wind. 2004. Available at: http://www.cener.com/documentacion/Wind power prediction in complex terrain-DELFT 2004.pdf.

38. Singer M, Mirocha J, Lundquist J. Implementation and assessment of turbine wake models in the Weather Research and Forecasting model for both mesoscale and large-eddy simulations. In: The Fifth International Symposium on Computational Wind Engineering (CWE2010). Chapel Hill. North Carolina, USA; 2010. Available at: ftp://ftp.atdd.noaa.gov/pub/cwe2010/Files/Papers/422_Singer.pdf.

39. Berge E, Gravdahl A, Schelling J. Wind in complex terrain. A comparison of WAsP and two CFD-models. Proceedings EWEC. 2006. Available at: http://www.windsim.com/documentation/papers_presentations/0602_ewec/ewec_berge.pdf.

40. Pope SB. Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press; 2000.

41. Jones W., Launder B. The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 1972;15(2):301-314.

42. Launder B., Morse A, Rodi W, Spalding DB. Prediction of free shear flows, a comparison of the performance of six turbulence models. In: Langley, US; 1972.

43. Detering HW, Etling D. Application of the E-? turbulence model to the atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 1985;33(2):113-133.

44. Apsley DD, Castro IP. A limited-length-scale k-$repsilon$ model for the neutral and stably-stratified atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorology. 1997;83(1):75–98.

45. Crespo A, Manuel F, Moreno D, Fraga E, Hernandez J. Numerical analysis of wind turbine wakes. In: Proceedings of the Delphi Workshop on Wind Energy Applications.Vol 1.; 1985:15–25.

38

46. Panofsky HA, Dutton JA. Atmospheric Turbulence. Models and Methods for Engineering Applications. New York: Wiley; 1984.

47. Richards P, Hoxey R. Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models using the k- turbulence model. Journal of wind engineering and Industrial aerodynamics. 1993;46-47:145-153.

48. El Kasmi A, Masson C. Turbulence modeling of atmospheric boundary layer flow over complex terrain: a comparison of models at wind tunnel and full scale. Wind Energy. 2010;13(8):689-704.

49. Alinot C, Masson C. k-epsilon Model for the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Under Various Thermal Stratifications. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2005;127(4):438-443.

50. Prospathopoulos J, Voutsinas S. Implementation issues in 3D wind flow predictions over complex terrain. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering. 2006;128:539.

51. Wyngaard JC. Modeling the planetary boundary layer - Extension to the stable case. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 1975;9(4).

52. Brodeur P, Masson C. Numerical site calibration over complex terrain. Journal of Energy Engineering. 2008;130(3).

53. Cattin R, Schaffner B. Validation of CFD Wind Resource Modeling in Highly Complex Terrain. In: 2006 EWEC.; 2006. Available at: http://meteotest.meteotest.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/Windenergie/pdfs/paper_cfd_ewec_06.pdf.

54. Anon. The Weather Research&Forecasting Model Website. Available at: http://www.wrf-model.org/index.php. Accessed August 21, 2011.

55. Foley AM, Leahy PG, Marvuglia A, McKeogh EJ. Current methods and advances in forecasting of wind power generation. Renewable Energy. 2012;37(1):1-8.

56. Leutbecher M, Palmer TN. Ensemble forecasting. Journal of Computational Physics. 2008;227(7):3515-3539.

57. Pereira RF, Guedes RA, Santos CS. Reduction of uncertainty in Resource Assessment through flow model “ensemble.” In: EWEC 2010. Warsaw; 2010.

58. Hansen MOL. Aerodynamics of wind turbines. Earthscan; 2008.

59. Sumner J, Masson C. A Turbulence-based Model for Resolving Velocity and Temperature Profiles in the Atmospheric Surface Layer. Wind Engineering. 2006;30(4):317-340.

60. Sumner J, Masson C. Influence of Atmospheric Stability on Wind Turbine Power Performance Curves. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2006;128(4):531-538.

61. Rosen A, Sheinman Y. The average output power of a wind turbine in a turbulent wind. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1994;51(3):287–302.

39

62. Sheinman Y, Rosen A. A dynamic model for performance calculations of grid-connected horizontal axis wind turbines. Part I: Description model. Wind Engineering. 1991;15(4):211–228.

63. Sheinman Y, Rosen A. A dynamic model for performance calculations of grid-connected horizontal axis wind turbines. Part II: Validation. Wind Engineering. 1991;15(4):229–239.

64. Sheinman Y, Rosen A. A dynamic model of the influence of turbulence on the power output of a wind turbine. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1992;39(1-3):329–341.

65. Albers A. Turbulence and Shear Normalisation of Wind Turbine Power Curve. development. 1994;3:4.

66. Kaiser K, Langreder W, Hohlen H, Højstrup J. Turbulence Correction for Power Curves. In: Peinke J, Schaumann P, Barth S, eds. Wind Energy. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2007:159-162.

67. Llombart A, Watson S, Llombart D, Fandos J. Power Curve Characterization I: improving the bin method. In: ICREPQ 2005. Zaragoza; 2005.

68. Tindal A, Johnson C, LeBlanc M, et al. Site-specific adjustments to wind turbine power curves. In: Proceedings of AWEA windpower Conference, Houston.; 2008.

69. Anahua E, Barth S, Peinke J. Markovian power curves for wind turbines. Wind Energy. 2008;11(3):219-232.

70. Gottschall J, Peinke J. How to improve the estimation of power curves for wind turbines. Environmental Research Letters. 2008;3:015005.

71. Durand WF. Aerodynamic theory. Springer; 1934.

72. Gur O, Rosen A. Comparison Between Blade-Element Models of Propellers. Aeronautical Journal. 2008;112(1138):689–704.

73. Rosen A, Gur O. Novel approach to axisymmetric actuator disk modeling. AIAA journal. 2008;46(11):2914–2925.

74. Schepers JG, Pascal L, Snel H. First results from Mexnext: Analysis of detailed aerodynamic measurements on a 4.5 m diameter rotor placed in the large German Dutch Wind Tunnel DNW. In: EWEA Annual Event.; 2011.

75. Sanderse B, van der Pijl S, Koren B. Review of CFD for wind-turbine wake aerodynamics. Dutch Wind Workshop: ECN; 2010. Available at: http://oai.cwi.nl/oai/asset/17492/17492A.pdf.

76. Lissaman PBS, Wilson RE. Applied aerodynamics of wind power machines(rotor blades(turbomachinery)). 1974.

77. Mikkelsen R. Actuator disc methods applied to wind turbines. 2003.

40

78. Vermeer LJ, Sørensen JN, Crespo A. Wind turbine wake aerodynamics. Progress in Aerospace Sciences. August;39(6-7):467-510.

79. Crespo A, Hernandez J, Frandsen S. Survey of modelling methods for wind turbine wakes and wind farms. Wind energy. 1999;2(1):1-24.

80. Katic I, Højstrup J. A simple model for cluster efficiency. In: EWEA.; 1986.

81. Larsen GC. A simple wake calculation procedure. Risø-M-2760, Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark. 1988.

82. Ishihara T, Yamaguchi A, Fujino Y. Development of a new wake model based on a wind tunnel experiment. Global Wind Power. 2004. Available at: http://windeng.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/posters/2004_gwp_poster.pdf.

83. Højstrup J, Courtney M, Christensen CJ, Sanderhoff P. Full scale measurments in wind-turbine arrays. Norrekaer Enge II: Riso; 1993.

84. Højstrup J. Probability structure of turbulence in a windfarm. In: Proc. 20th Meet. of experts - Wind characteristics of relevance for wind turbine design. Julich; 1991:15-19.

85. Højstrup J, Norgard P. Taendpibe windfarm measurments 1988. Roskilde: Riso National Laboratory; 1990.

86. Frandsen S, Chacon L, Crespo A, et al. Measurments on and Modelling of Offshore Wind Farms. Roskilde: Riso National Laboratory; 1996.

87. Holland JH. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: An introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. Oxford, England: U Michigan Press; 1975.

88. Mosetti G, Poloni C, Diviacco B. Optimization of wind turbine positioning in large windfarms by means of a genetic algorithm. Journal Of Wind Engineering And Industrial Aerodynamics. 1994;51(1):105-116.

89. ibot S, Turgut Ö, Tunç M, Çamdalı Ü. Optimal positioning of wind turbines on Gökçeada using multi!objective genetic algorithm. Wind Energy. 2010;13(4):297-306.

90. Samorani M. The Wind Farm Layout Optimization Problem. Leeds School of Business Research Paper Series, University of Colorado at Boulder. 2010.

91. Rivas RA. Optimization of Offshore Wind Farm Layouts. 2008.

92. Ozturk UA. Heuristic methods for wind energy conversion system positioning. Electric Power Systems Research. 2004;70(3):179-185.

93. Mittal A. Optimization of the layout of large wind farms using a genetic algorithm. 2010:1-90.

94. Lackner M, Elkinton C. An Analytical Framework for Offshore Wind Farm Layout Optimization. An Analytical Framework for Offshore Wind Farm Layout Optimization. 2007;31(1):17-31.

41

95. Kusiak A, Song Z. Design of wind farm layout for maximum wind energy capture. Renewable energy. 2009;35(3):685-694.

96. Huang H. Distributed Genetic Algorithm for Optimization of Wind Farm Annual Profits. In: International Conference on Intelligent Systems Applications to Power Systems.; 2007:1-6.

97. González JS, Rodriguez AGG, Mora JC, Santos JR, Payan MB. Optimization of wind farm turbines layout using an evolutive algorithm. Renewable energy. 2010;35(8):1671–1681.

98. Grady S, Hussaini MY, Abdullah MM. Placement of wind turbines using genetic algorithms. Renewable Energy. 2005;30(2):259-270.

99. González JS, Rodríguez ÁGG, Mora JC, Burgos Payán M, Santos JR. Overall design optimization of wind farms. Renewable Energy. 2011;36(7):1973-1982.

100. Elkinton JF, Manwell F, McGowan JG. Offshore wind farm layout optimization (OWFLO) project: an introduction. In: Offshore Wind. Copenhagen; 2005.

101. Chowdhury S, Zhang J, Messac A, Castillo L. Unrestricted wind farm layout optimization (UWFLO): Investigating key factors influencing the maximum power generation. Renewable Energy. 2012;38(1):16-30.

102. Castromora J, Calerobaron J, Riquelmesantos J, Burgospayan M. An evolutive algorithm for wind farm optimal design. Neurocomputing. 70:16-18.

103. Wan C, Wang J, Yang G, Zhang X. Optimal Micro-siting of Wind Farms by Particle Swarm Optimization. In: Tan Y, Shi Y, Tan KC, eds. Advances in Swarm Intelligence.Vol 6145. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2010:198-205.

104. Pont BLD, Cagan J. An Extended Pattern Search Approach to Wind Farm Layout Optimization. ASME Conf. Proc. 2010;2010(44090):677-686.

105. Donovan S. Wind farm optimization.

106. Saavedra-Moreno B, Salcedo-Sanz S, Paniagua-Tineo A, Prieto L, Portilla-Figueras A. Seeding evolutionary algorithms with heuristics for optimal wind turbines positioning in wind farms. Renewable Energy. 2011;36(11):2838-2844.

107. P. Ra!uo B, Bengin A. Optimization of Wind Farm Layout. FME transactions. 2010;38:107-114.

108. Mette. WindPro2-optimize module output. 2010:1-3.

109. AWS truewind. openwind theory and validation V1.2. 2009.

110. Buckley R. WindSim | Maximize production. Minimize loads. 2009:1-4.

111. CENER. CFDWind 2.0. 2010.

112. Larsen GC. A simple generic wind farm cost model tailored for wind farm optimization. TOPFARM; 2009.

42

113. Larsen G, Madsen H, Larsen T, Mann J, Bingol F. TOPFARM - next generation design tool for optimisation of wind farm topology and operation. 2009:1-38.

114. Réthoré PE, Fuglsang P, Larsen GC, et al. TopFarm: Multi-fidelity Optimization of Offshore Wind Farm. In: ISOPE. Maui, Hawaii, USA; 2011.

115. Rodrigo J. State-of-the-Art of Wind Resource Assessment. 2011:1-24.

116. Moreno P, Gravdhal AR, Romero M. Wind flow over complex terrain: application of linear and CFD model. European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition. 2003:16–19.

117. Schlez W, Tindal A. Wind Farm Siting and Layout Design guidelines, Garrad Hassan and Partners Ltd. World Wind Energy Association. Available at: http://www.wwindea.org/technology/ch02/en/2_4_2.html. Accessed August 26, 2011.

118. Cochran RB, Orwig K, Peterka J. Complex Terrain: A Valid Wind Option? 2008.

119. Castro FA, Santos CS, Costa JC. Development of a meso-microscale coupling procedure for site assessment in complex terrain. megajoule.pt. 2010. Available at: http://www.megajoule.pt/img_upload/Publications/Development of a meso-microscale coupling procedure for site assessment in complex terrain_paper.pdf.

120. Palma J, Castro F, Ribeiro L, Rodrigues A, Pinto A. Linear and nonlinear models in wind resource assessment and wind turbine micro-siting in complex terrain. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. 2008;96(12):2308-2326.

121. Milashuk S. Wind speed prediction accuracy and expected errors of RANS equations in low relief inland terrain for wind resource assessment purposes. Environmental Modelling & Software. 2010;26(4):429-433.

122. Mickle RE, Cook NJ, Hoff AM, et al. The Askervein Hill Project: Vertical profiles of wind and turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 1988;43(1-2):143-169.

123. Matsushita D, Matsumiya H, Hara Y, Watanabe S, Furukawa A. Studies on numerical site calibration over complex terrain for wind turbines. Sci China Technol Sc. 2010;53(1):8-12.

124. Uchida T, Ohya Y. Micro-siting technique for wind turbine generators by using large-eddy simulation. 2008:1-18.

125. Cabezon D, Sumner J, Garcia B, Sanz J, Masson C. RANS simulations of wind flow at the Bolund experiment. In: EWEC 2010.; 2010:1-6. Available at: http://www.ewec2010proceedings.info/ewea2011/papers/102.pdf.

126. Kirrkamm N. Simulating of a multi mega watt wind turbine with opensource code openfoam. 2010:1.

127. Stoevesandt B. OpenFOAM: RANS-Simulation of a wind turbine and verification. In: The Science of Making Torque from the Wind.; 2011.

128. Lackner M, Manwell J. A New Decision Making Approach to Wind Energy Site Assessment. Wind Engineering. 2007;31(4):247-265.

43

129. Lackner M, AL Rogers, James F. Manwell. The round robin site assessment method: A new approach to wind energy site assessment. Renewable Energy. 2008. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S096014810700403X.

130. Gross G. Numerical simulations to the diurnal variation of wakes behind wind turbines. Meteorologische Zeitschrift. 2010;19(1):91-99.

131. Pinard J. Computer Models for Wind Flow over Mesoscale Mountainous Terrain Applied to the Yukon. 1999:1-45.

132. Bechmann A, Berg J, Courtney M. The Bolund experiment: Overview and background. Roskilde: Risø; 2009. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/3btd9fb.

133. Bechmann A. The Bolund experiment: Results of the Blind Comparison. 2009. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/3sves8b.

134. Li C, Chen Z, Zhang Z, Cheung J. Wind tunnel modeling of flow over mountainous valley terrain. Wind Struct. 2010;13(3):275-292.

135. Prospathopoulos J, Politis E. Modelling wind turbine wakes in complex terrain. In: EWEC 2008. Project UPWIND; 2008.

136. O’Sullivan J, Pecnik R, Iaccarino G. Investigating turbulence in wind flow over complex terrain. In: Center for Turbulence Research. Proceedings of the Summer Program 2010.; 2010:129.

137. Russell A. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of atmospheric flow applied to wind energy research. 2009.

138. Sumner J, Mason C. k- Simulations of the Neutral ABL: Achieving Horizontal Homogeneity on Practical Grids. In: Proceedings of 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Orlando, FL, US: AIAA; 2010. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/6dfu6wl.

139. Patankar SV. Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. Hemisphere Pub. Corp. 1980.

140. Launder BE, Spalding DB. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 1974;3(2):269-289.

141. Schneiderbauer S, Pirker S. Determination of Open Boundary Conditions for Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) from interior observations. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 2010;35(2):763-780.

142. Jasak H. Error analysis and estimation for the finite volume method with applications to fluid flows. PhD thesis. 1996. Available at: http://powerlab.fsb.hr/ped/kturbo/OpenFOAM/docs/HrvojeJasakPhD.pdf.

143. Haupt S, Zajaczkowski F, Schmehl K. Downscaling by Assimilating NWP fields into a CFD Model. 91st American Meteorological Society Annual Meeting. 2011. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/3r77ft3.

144. Sanderse B. Aerodynamics of wind turbine wakes. ECN; 2009. Available at: http://www.ecn.nl/docs/library/report/2009/e09016.pdf.

44

145. Yoshida S. Performance of downwind turbines in complex terrains. Wind Engineering. 2006;30:487-501.

146. Hashimoto T, Yoshida S, Iso O. Wind Farm Layout Optimization in Complex Terrains. In: EWEC 2007. Milan, Italy: EWEA; 2007.

45

!"#$%A&! !'()*!+,-,.*,!",-/!0)1.2

!"#"$%& !"'( )*"$ +,(,-$ !#."/(,012,(& +""3(#4 14"0#5,6 +7()& , 1. +,#,. +,$( (,')-,"*, !"5(6 .+,$""- 3#& )*"$& +4 !"7"(0 !(,') &%"1#4 1. +,#,. +,$( “1:

1. +"$1,) &$(' 2,(& +""3(#4, +,2,(& +,316+&

2. $,41 &$(' 2,(& +""3(#4 ",6"$+"(,%4 ,4 +"

3. +$(' &7()&-,"*!",8$ (+4' 2,( +,,2 ,4 2,( +#"'(,5 "*" 1) 1$.2& (,0"" 1. &&,'3 )micro siting(

+,#,. +,14-8 +,(4+$ &14& +,$(& +.,1. +,",(.64 1. '2(& !,2+& /,+' -,"* 1. 2,(& -68& +"3,1,(,45$',91&1 +,4',$ 9&. "67 .

!"#$%&Reanalysis

5-",(6& -Reanalysis&#,.4(1 /()# &(4'" ')"& "- National Center for Environmental Prediction1, - National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP,NCAR), , 97$ (241

)0,') !3 "!"(24 !"6,3 " , !&'&-European Center for medium range forecasting 2, - NASA 3 . ,+(5$ &#"& 2,,($ !) !""$"1-4 !"#,+# +6$ +("0")+.( (&,*7 17 "#6 1) *"24, "#3,$,&" 4

)!"(82 !"#,+# 411( ,(+," ,4 (,.) /.$1 ,)" &+,4' .,$". "&5".,+# +)$5&1 !"#)data assimilation .(($,17 ,+,"56,#"8 +,"3,1,(,45$ +,#2+$ )*"$ ,+,*#,8,"*( ,5,1""6 "#,1' ,!"8,5$ ,

"#,4+, ,:84# !"#",,1, !"6,0$ ,9",$ , 1"'.' 97,&, +.,(1,2+4"1',13 "($,# 1*,$ 1. ",%"21 3%$ (",,4& .

!"",#".& +4 (-")' 4,0$1 &#"& 5-",(6& +(5$!""(68,$54& &7,$# +,("*+ "1)' . +,0(&'+,"+(3.(",,4 3%$ +"%2+ (,') ,+,$3$ +,0"6-, "+,"+"$4 41 " !"#,+#'+,1,7" +5"..7 (0,,"&1

1*,$1 +8#7,$ &.*2 &%"1#4 . 9+"##$"&1) 1*,$' .,$". "*" 1) ,14& !""+,4"0$ 41& !"",#".&$ state of the art **,' !"#,+#& +)$5& (,')!1,7 &.)#. "67 #& 5-",(6'"1 .:8,#' , ,"& 41. !"#,+#7 !"$""- &)0,'.+"%2+& !"1,7" +"(,-$&17"&11 .*2$ &%"1#4 !".,).7 )reanalysis( , &40,+&,

!""$"1-4& !"#,+#& 1. (+," &',5 &"0-"*(6 &"&+ , 5'$, (",,4& 3%$ "#,+# 1) "1',13 5'$ 1'-1 +1,7"+,*"*$ *,4$ 5)$ ." !&' !"(,%4 1) *"24 .+& !"41$ !"#,+# (,$47 4"& 5-",(6& 1. +".,$".& &40,

17 "#6 1) &*"24 +.('&*7"41.

'$#!&$(#) '$(*' '+%

+"(,%4 ,4 +"$,41 &$(' 2,(& +""3(#4 +7()& (,') , ),'- 96,4' !"2-1#& !"#,+#' .$+.&1 9+"#)" ""+,(".&!"(-")& !"#,+#& (,-$7 !""3,1,(,45$& , (,') ,4&4,,.& 14 !"#,+# !"(2)!"#,+# 9,37

& 5-",(6$-Reanalysis.(

"46,("4& +,2,(& 81544 , 1. (,%4 &87$&6 212. 5 02 km! ,(- +,*"*$' .$+.& +,")- +,"56,#"8 +,#2+$)!"#(+ "'3 1) 2,( "*$ (2,( 9,,"7, +,("&$ 1. , 1. &6,-+ "#6 1)10!"#. ,"*7

' 2,(& !"1-4 +4 ),'-1-190+,#2+ .:8,#' ,29 &*"*$ +,#2+ ,((2.. ,.$". +,*#,8,"*( "*7 4,0$1 "6,(58,43& +,2,(& !"1-4 +4)' +(4,+$& &."3& "61 -(62.8 .(

& +,#2+& ',(& 1. !"5(*#58' +,.$+.$ +,"3,1,(,45$-WMO) & -World Meteorological Organization( ,4(. !.1 ,##7,+ 41 ,$".. '&(+4' 2,(& +""3(#4 +7() .971 , &("2'&, .,$".&

/"(0 ,147 +,#2+$ !"#,+# 1.,.)"&1+&("&% &(,0' ,!""$1,3& !"#,+#& +-"*' /,+.

%',- '$.#./

(*& 4"& (+4' &*"*$& /"()&1 &0,6#& /+4 (+,"' '(& -,"*' 1. (+4' &"3(#4& +-,6+ +"%2+ +**,' 2,( +#"'(,5 ,4 2,( +,,2 ."5"(- 4,& +,*"*$& 1. -,"*& , +"82" &"3(#4& +,6"60. 9,,"7$

46

!"#"$#% %&'() (*+% !*+"%,$ .-.*/) ,* 0",1 !*"%$ %0"0,% +"#2, $1 3",4 "02 5+*4$ 10", +*)6$% 7*# 4$$ )+ 3,'%1+8 .

!*82 0, 3*92 7":*#8 7""/42, 7"+"#2, "1 !*#1/ (*+% !*0"0, )*+)cup anemometer .(#2, $# !*9%/!%%)*: 38*4) !/)*,* %+&(/ %$4 7"+"1*0" !*4"9#% +*&,* , 7"!"1$ !4' $2) 54

!*)*+&!4' %4"9#) !*)#(!% 3"4 . 7""/*.4+:$*4 (*+ "0, 7",""& -.*/))sonic anemometer( . %0"0,% 7%)..*),! 3,' !0"0,* 7""09/ 7"/**"2 "/#) $*& $9 .$*8 +*9"# $1 %1*/!%*$# . %4"9#%

!"+&"1% !4' %&"/2:)%, !1)*/"/*.4+:$*4% .$*8% $# +9#,%* +*./.% $# %1+85–8 . )6& $$9) $# %0"0,%* %*)9% %,"90% (*+% ")"2+ !#*$# 00, 79 $)&!,$#%"6/$*)+*:% , %+*:+8,:%

!"+8.*,:4% !*)"6"%* . !*+,$ $)9*, 3""01 7%) #*,"#% 32$* !*82 "0,, %)+%) 7"+&" %$4 7"0,7/*+!" .+!*") ;*8/% 0,% 4*% !*82% 0,# 3**"2, ,#% !*+*&, $1 %+6& %)(+% 342 4)*! %4"9

*$# 7""+&"1% .) 4*6,$ 3!"/ %4$, %+"&.-Kristensen 9$#,$ .

1 (*+ !0"0,) %4"9#% !*+*&," !4 7"$$*2 $09, ")9 $1 3&!*,% 4*%#$2 0, "$09,% !18#% , 0,% !4 &"'(,% :*,%)boom ($09,$ 0,% +*)"() 7"+*#&% 7")"2+% +4#* . $# 3*/2!% 32 *,2

+:,*,/4%)) +&"1) 4:)!,%%)*9!% 3,' ,*$# 5+*4% 1*)& *4 0l - $# 5+*4% 4*%# !., +"**4% 0"0,% 5+0 !+)*1#$1 1")6, 4*%# 01 $# %)*9! 63% 5+1%,"!",4% "*/"# +*)1 ) 0("%,(*+ !*+ ,

step change (+"%, */"% %)*9!% 3,'# %'2 !*"%$ 5"+6 ,7"+:, +8., $# 5+*4 1*)& +,*$2 .2! 3*/) %4"9#$ 4")%$ $*2" +:,*,/4%7"/8*4 +8.,:

)i( u-bias!*+"%, !+)9% , %"$1$ +%, +!*" )"9, +:,*,/4%# 3**"2,% !*+"%,)%!*4 +*)1 %0"+"$ +#4, (*+%,6*1 .

)ii( v-bias 79 %/*2,% DP error) 10", 0*)"1Data Processing ( 1)*/*, 4$4 "+*:&** 0"0, */"4 0,%# 52,"+*#",% (*+% )"2+ !4 00*.

)iii( w-bias .*/".*& %/"4# %)*9!, 1)*/)cosine ( )"2+) 7""*/"#$ 7$#*,w (*+% !*+"%, $#

)iv( stress bias .*& 38*4) )"9, 0"0,% 74 &+ .84$ %**#7$#*, ".*/" $% 3") %"6$+*&7""&8*4% 7")"2+) 7""*/"#7""2/4%* (*+% !*+"%, $# .

%$4% !*":%% !1)+4)bias ( 7"/*#% %"6/$*)+*:% ")"2+$ !*".("2 2 2/ ) /, ( , / )( ()u v wU U U! ! !*-2/uw U,%,4!%) 9 . !*4"9#%(i),(ii)* -(iv) $$2 5+0)!*/:&

,-1%, +!*" $# &(+,) 3&!*,% +6& %)*9! 3,' 71 +:,*,/4 +*)1 -101&+&%, +:, .) !*4"9#% -(iii) !*#+*0:$*4 +:,*,/4$ !*82 0, !*0"0, 3") 7"**#,#2 )$ !,*#! "/*. 4+.

%)*#( !*82 "0, $# %&*'(!% , 1*)& 38*4) 7!*4 $""2$* &*0)$ 5+*6 #"* "02%$) &*"0 (":(*+% !*"*+"%, !0"0,) 3,' 5+*4$ . ;$,*,$*"2% !4 16)$ !)&"/) (*+ +*)1 *) !*"*+"%,% (**:

!'2+!,%0"0,% .7$*4*,"## 3**"2, #!)&"/) 3,' 5+*4* +&" (*+ ) 7"!"1$!)&"/ (*+ *#8 %/"4 :46,/)(+"0! 38*4) 16)!, */"4 %'2 $*"2 . "*6+% 0,% !*0"0, !4 !**#%$ 4"% !"#*,"# %)":/+:$4

%0"0,% +!4) +(4 ./+8+ +"#2,$10 ,#"#2 3**"2, +!*" )*: &*"0 !/!*/ *' %:"## !*/1: 3/ %"6/$*)+*:%#!)&"/)%+8.*,:4) )6,% !4 !8&#, %/"4* "0, %2*,/ (*+% .

$09,% :*,% *4 )boom(+:,*,/4% +)*(, *"$4 , %,"+'% $1 7"1"8#, 7",+*9* $ %4"9#) !0"0,(*+% 3**"2* !*+"%,11,12 . 3**"2,$09,%#, :*,% 3**"2) (*+% !4 +"!. ,"02 (*+ !0"0, $)&$

$# 4$,% (**:) 360, !*$1 #" 7""/#) #,!#%$%0"0, %)*9 $2) 7"+:,*,/4 +!*" *4 .!18#% +!.%%$09,% 5!( $# %"+:,*4"9) %"*$! % . 4*% +:,*,/4% 7*&",$ ;$,*,% &(+,%1-5$09, "+:& 12

. 5)., $09,, %+!.%$ 4,9*0)lattice tower (!96*, +*"6) A-1a . +:,*,/4% 3&!*, *"$1 :*,%)boom (!"!*1,#, %1+8%$ +*&, *,61) !*"%$ $*2"11 .%, !16*,,% %1+8%%-boom +*"6) !96*,

A-1b ,*+4 !*0"0, 5*!,(**: !*2 . %18#%%# !*4+$ 3!"/%-boom %/"4 !"#8*(% %+8.*,:4) %$*09 , 4"%# "82!)&"/)(*+% 11 .!4' !*+,$ , "02 7"+&(,, !1)*/% %6$,%% %18#%% !4 3":&%$!*)&"/)

!*(8$ +:,*,/4% !4 3"&!%$ 4"% %+8.*,:4)* (*+12*,61 :*,% $1, :*, "+:& . 1/,"%$ 3!"/

47

!"#$# %&'($ )! %'# &* +%#'#,-$ .')/# /!/ &* $,)0$$ %'#' &!"#$ &1 0'*21$$#& ,3 +0'/ '- $&*# /2&3 &!"# /+%) ,0'+4- 0'*+2$ '- )+( /!3'& -&&.

!"#$ A-1 - )a (% &"''()* +"!* &"#"!#*( ,#- .+#*" #2 &"/0 #'( 1".( 2#!3("()4 56 *#$7)"/0+"!* ,""#0 . 8-.( 5'1( #'#$ #)6( 2#)7&"( 2#!3("()4*5%- 56 8&+ 8!"4 1.2!3( . 2#)7&"( "#5% 3"(* 8!"4

4* 2#!3("())boom ( 4"*2.5!3( ) .b (% 8-.( 5'1(( +"!* *5%(- &''()* +"!* &"!#*( ,#- .+#*" #)6 # &"/0 #'(* 5% 2#)7&"(boom, ,#-5*%!/* 455 9"6+ !3("()4 ,56 *#$7)"/0+"!* ,""#0 . &"/0* #'(

2#)7&"(5.5 #!37 boom* 5%( -boom .)E. Petersen 1989b( $!/!#$ &!"# .')/#)siting (5+* 0'+64 0'!/!#& &/('$& &'3/ /(%/# -& 72'-( , &/'3# !# +'(* ."

$' &!"#& 64/( (%/$ .)'##$-boom .73& , '( )/'!#$ .')#( 0/1*, $,/- $!/!#$ .- -8#/ ('(/6 +/8$,/(+'%$ , *)1'# 0'/$& 5/+8 /,!2) 7',30./!#$ $('"' $!/!#$ !'#* .')/#( . $/2+"'2'%$ 0*21$ 0-$& 70/,* 5/+*" .//+-,/& .//+#', ./&!'# /)WaSP 4,13 ( .//+-,/& -& '-)CFD 14 . ( /!3- 7/%)$& 0

/+#',$ &'!/#$# $-8'03 0'-/"1$ +12-$ &33 $#'! +'9-( $1*/ ./+%#'#,-$ .')/#1 :&#'# $!'),& 0,,3'0#$ , $('"& +1)$($!'),( *)+)$ ,4'+& $2/14 ,*)+) 6'264 , $('"' *)+)$ 1'#/1 $!'),$

*)+)$ /,2 &*# . ./"!$ $,'+4-&Brower 151$$ 0- 4'+ 0',/(+'%' ./+%#'#,- .')/# &1 $*20'#'! 0'!'),(4'+$ (-1# 03+*$( 0'-!''$ +6'4 &* 0/0/630' 0/2+"'2'% .Brower( 0'!/!# *8/( -

740'!'), , 0/+#',$ $/8&'#/6$ &- 70'- $''1$'SiteWIND15 $!/!#$ /!'#* !4- /,'0,( $1#01$1 4'+$ 0'+/$# 0'"&20$ 0- 0'94& 0,# &*$!'),(+4- 0 . $0''1'$ $/8&'#/6$ 7/(& $!/!#$ 7/( $-/"1$

&*)+)$ /-''0 7/( 7'/#! /,1 7/( 0'!'),$ $/8&'#/6& '1#/11 )topographic similarity '$1 $+!" /,1 7/( 4'+$ /,''/3' 0'/'+/$# 0'"&20$ 7/( 7'/#!$ /!/ &*0'!'),$ .( /+/2#- +1) -8#, 0'-/"1$ 7/(

/,1(0'!'),$*)+)$ /,2( 7'/#!$ 7/(& , /!3 4'+$ 0',/(+'% .')/# &1 $/89/#/%2'-& '+'0( 1#/110/0,1$ $)'20( $-/"1$ 0- 7/%)$&.

.//,'6-+%&'- ./!# , 5&'$ .$( 1'#/1$1+('"'16* 4'+$ 0'+/$# 0- ./!!'# " /,#9 /$*',0$ &1 /,1 ./6&'2, 1t '-2t,'/3( ./*,$ $!'), $0'- 5+! ./3'2$ ./,'17 . 7/- 73&' ./*, ./)&4 7/- $9 !#& '& 0-

$0'23$ !#& 1/1 $('"0 7#9& 0'+'1)$ 0'/*( .72'- '0'-( , 1/ )+ 5+'8$)'940( /&-#/,/# . )4+# .-$*',0$ -'$ ./6&'2$ &1 l,9- / 4'+$ 0'+/$# lS 7#9' $9 )4+# &1 $/8),'2 -/$ $*',0$ ./6&'2$ &1

!(&(1 2·(1( 2) )1///l tS l t! " , $+26'#%-$ (8#( $/'&0 /0&( +#'&3.

6'(# ./!# &1 ;6', "'66/)'4+# $1/4 ./3+'# *)+)& !'#8$ 7)0## ' /&" &1 ./6&'2 +"1# &'))SoDAR – Sonic Detection And Ranging ( .//%,"#'+%)&- ./&" '-)LiDAR – Light

Detection And Ranging ( ./&'6'+-# ./+94$ &()#')LiDAR ( +/''-$ 0'2/28 //',/1 '-)SoDAR(. &1 $!/!# 0&()0# 0-9 $+'8(/2'+2 &1 $('" !* 4'+$ 0'+/$# &200+%# 18–27 . +/4#$

0','+4-$ ./,1( !+'/' 5&'$ $&- ./+/13# &102&4$ 5+'8& .$( 7//,*$ 0+("$& &/()#( /!'#* $!/!# ./3#''% +%')' $('"1 7'./,1$ .* &!"' 5&'$ 4'+$ 0',/(+ , $&!"$!/!#$ /!'#* 0'&* ." , 0-9

0#'*&/ 0!/+'&- ./!# 0'&* . +-1, ./(3+'# ./+'9- +'(* '&- ./!#( 1'#/1$+'02 -& -1', , 7''/3#* 0'+/$#$ ('1/41" '&- ./+/13# /(4+ +'9- /,2 &* *'8/# &* 66(0# , +1-3 ./(3+'# ./+'9-(

/0//*( $9 *'8/#0/,"'#'$ $,/- $#/+9$ 73119,22,28,29 .

48

!"#$% &'(')*A:

1. Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, et al. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 1996;77(3):437-471.

2. Gibson J, Fiorino M, Hernandez A. The ECMWF 40 year re-analysis (ERA-40) project—Plans and current status. The 10th Symposium on Global Change Studies. 1999. Available at: http://ams.confex.com/ams/older/99annual/abstracts/1608.htm.

3. Schubert S, Rood R, Pfaendtner J. An update on NASA Reanalysis effort. Subm. to BAMS. 1993.

4. Petersen EL, Troen I. European wind atlas. Roskilde: Risø National Laboratory; 1989.

5. Grelle A, Lindroth A. Flow Distortion by a Solent Sonic Anemometer: Wind Tunnel Calibration and its Assessment for Flux Measurements over Forest and Field. Journal Of Atmospheric And Oceanic Technology. 1994;11(6):1529-1542.

6. Kraan C, Oost WA. A New Way of Anemometer Calibration and Its Application to a Sonic Anemometer. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 1989;6(3):516-524.

7. Mortensen NG. Flow-response characteristics of the Kaijo Denki omni-directional sonic anemometer. Roskilde: Risø National Laboratory; Risø-R-704, 1994.

8. Mann J, Cariou J, Courtney M, et al. Comparison of 3D Turbulence Measurements Using Three Staring Wind Lidars and a Sonic Anemometer. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 2008;1. Available at: http://iopscience.iop.org/1755-1315/1/1/012012.

9. Kristensen L. Cup anemometer behavior in turbulent environments. Journal Of Atmospheric And Oceanic Technology. 1998;15:5-17.

10. Paulsen US, Mortensen NG, Hansen C, A.A.E.S. Moussa. Field calibration of cup anemometers. Available at: http://130.226.56.153/rispubl/art/2007_134_paper.pdf.

11. Maribo Pedersen B, Hansen KS, Øye S, Brinch M, Febian O. Some experimental investigations on the influence of the mounting arrangements on the accuracy of cup-anemometer measurements. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1992;39(1-3):373-383.

12. Kaimal J, Finnigan J. Atmospheric boundary layer flows: their structure and measurement. Oxford University Press; 1994.

13. Mortensen NG, Landberg L, Troen I, Petersen EL. Wind atlas analysis and application program (WAsP). vol 2: User’s Guide. Roskilde: Risø National Laboratory; Risø-I-666(EN), 1993.

14. Sumner J, Sibuet Watters C, Masson C. CFD in Wind Energy: The Virtual, Multiscale Wind Tunnel. Energies. 2010;3(5):989-1013.

49

15. Brower M, Robinson N, Hale E. Quantification and Applications of Wind Flow Modeling Uncertainty. AWS truepower (TM); 2010:1.

16. Probst O, Cardenas D. State of the Art and Trends in Wind Resource Assessment. Energies. 2010;3(6):1087-1141.

17. Petersen E, Mortensen N, Landberg L, Højstrup J, Frank H. Wind power meteorology. Part II: siting and models. Wind Energy. 1998;1(2):55-72.

18. Betancur S, lemoine r, boinne r, mali p, dewilde l. Reducing risks in resource assessment using LIDAR. windexpo conference paper. 2008:1-20.

19. Bingoel F, Mann J, Foussekis D. Conically scanning lidar error in complex terrain. Meteorol Z. 2009;18(2):189-195.

20. Bingöl F, Mann!dots J. LiDAR error estimation with WAsP engineering. IOP Conference Series: Earth !dots. 2008. Available at: http://iopscience.iop.org/1755-1315/1/1/012058.

21. Kelley ND, Jonkman BJ, Scott GN, G.N. Scott. Comparing Pulsed Doppler LIDAR with SODAR and Direct Measurements for Wind Assessment. In: American Wind Energy Association WindPower 2007 Conference and Exhibition.; 2007:1-24.

22. Bradley S. Wind speed errors for LIDARs and SODARs in complex terrain. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2008;1(1). Available at: http://iopscience.iop.org/1755-1315/1/1/012061.

23. Clive P. Lidar and resource assessment for wind power applications: the state of the art. Proceedings of SPIE. 2008. Available at: http://link.aip.org/link/?PSISDG/7111/711107/1.

24. Clive P. Compensation of bias in Lidar wind resource assessment. Wind Engineering. 2008;32(5):415-432.

25. Smith D, Harris M, Coffey A, et al. Wind lidar evaluation at the Danish wind test site in Høvsøre. Wind Energy. 2006;9(1-2):87-93.

26. Courtney M. Lidars – better than metmasts? 2010. Available at: http://www.upwind.eu/pdf/UpWind_SideEvent_Courtney.pdf.

27. Mayer J. Characterisation of the atmospheric boundary layer in a complex terrain using SODAR-RASS. bayceer.uni-bayreuth.de. 2005. Available at: https://www.bayceer.uni-bayreuth.de/mm/de/top/diss/29352Thesis_final.pdf.

28. Rebecca Quinlan, David Wahl. Experience with LIDAR performance in complex terrain. In: NZ Wind Energy Conference. New Zealand; 2010:1-30.

29. Wang Y, Williamson C, Huynh G. Diagnostic Wind Model Initialization over Complex Terrain Using the Airborne Doppler Wind Lidar Data. The Open Remote Sensing Journal. 2010;3:17-27.

50

!"#$%B&! !!"'(!)*+,'!-).%/'*('01gusts2!! !"#$%&'(&)! *+#&, "-" %, %%. /(-' *0#&"+ !+"(1' !"#$%&'(&)! uI ,23*! *"")4 5"!6u! %6

"$7 %, !+"(1! *&("!+' 8""&$"6!10-60*&3- ,*,#&++! 9&(! *&("!+ "-" %, *%+(&$+:

)1-B( /u uI U!"

!"#$%&'(&)' 8""&$"6! *--+$!8"",') 8"+(&0+ 8",'&$ , !-"-+ "+(&0+ 80 /5) *'&0*& ,&#"+! 2+18"-"-+! %6 (-*!( .4&749! /(&5 %6& !'&0 %6 !"#3$&7 5"! !"#$%&'(&)! *+#&, .2"7&%9% , 2*"$

4&749! *&("!+' 23*! *"")4 *5 %+($%, / *u u! , !"#$%&'(&)! (65.,3(3! *'(3' *--+$ , %-&0&-'%' 4&749! /(&5 %6 !"#3$&7. '69"!% %&." !1 .8""%5()"$ 8"5$* (&', "$""7&5 /(, 9&)6 (&15'

5&! "$0&+&!&/ * 2.5u u! " . 8""&$"6 8$6"& "$0&+&! 5% 9)6 (&', (*&" !&'0 /(,! %%. /(-'8"%&-0 8""+&3+ .

"%5+&-$( /"%!*. (5*% 2*"$ 9&(! *&("!+' 8"")$%&'(&)! 8""&$"6! *5 , *&5(+ *&-"-+6.!+' 8""&$"6'9( 8"(-* 8&9* "$7 %, 9&(! *&("&9*& '9( /(&5 *&%534 8. &(#&$ 8"$&6 8"%-&+"-.

8"$&6! 8"(-*' !"0($5! %6 *&0%7*!! *5 (5*% ,!'&0!& *"(74&+)5! *&'"#"! %6 !"#3$&7. . 2*"$ *&976+ "$6% &%5 8"%-&+ 0&&4%– %+""3 *()374 )Kaimal (!'"'4 *&%%.!!&1–3 , (&5* *$*&$!

9%#&+ "("7+5!(74&+)5' --+$! 8&()374! %6 ,2&& *()374&- 2+(3)Von Karman ( *5 *(5*+! !"#$%&'(&)! *&0%7*!*&'3"$'*&%,*' !+"(1& 9&( , !+"(1 (&', "*&5"#+ *&97 (&5* *$*&$ /5

*"(74&+)54 ."(&5"*! %6 *&"(5%&7&7!8&5"*!+ !5($. *,'&$ 2+(3 2&& *()374 %, 8"44&'+! ( )&67! ")"%$5! .*&5+0&- (&"#' *&5(% 2*"$ !%5. *&()374% B-1a . "4&7") 8&()374) 8"5$* (&',

,3(3% "-+ '&(3 *"6,$ 5%6 !-"-+& 8"'"#"% 8"'&(3 (3+ (&15 %".+ 2&&".% !%"7$& '9( 8&+"4 %6 '#3' 8"!&'0! 8"(-*!5/3f # .$""7&5+ 8".&+$! 8"(-*' *&0!$*!!* !&'0 "$&6 "-" %, %%. /(-' *")4"))4 *&5-&& (4&9& .8"'"#" 5% 8"5$* (&', *&0%7*!! 2"' 8""*&,+6+ 8""&$"6 8$6" , 8""%5()"$

8"'"#"& ,'"#" 5% 8"5$* (&',6.!&'0 "$&6 6" 8" ,(*&" /&+$ "$&6! 8"'"#" 8"5$*' &%"5&.

!"#$ B-1 - (a) %&#!'% (""#)* +"!#%&% *#)! ,- %!./01% ,- ,2"&50/% #30 ,4& !.& 4/!, !"'5 !"*4 #,5!.#3 *")#- 64 7".-)L=\infinity ( *#$#(L=30 m) *#$# 5," )L = -30 m( ,-)-L(#3"& 8!"5 "3#% -

*"/"*"51–3 . +"3"-, 6##,53"#$!"0"!0 +"&"/4, +7+& 6#7.-%)variances) .(b ( ,- +"7#)-% +"9,0+%

* !+5%& 7"!% +"#"!#%& ,- 8!"5% +",5/1-Vindeby %*"9* 48!.& .% +.#- #0, "*-"7 6#)!"5"half variance ."8"+&) E. Petersen 1989(

' /(&5! *&%534% 2+1! *&%534 2"' (63% *"*(&4+! /(-! ! /(- 5"! !"#$%&'(&)-Taylor ‘frozen turbulence’ approximation .&1 !)"6 "7 %, !5#&* 5"! !"#$%&'(&)! %6 !3")4"))4!

:#( %6'#3' *('&,! !+"(1! %6 *&5&73 *&$&+* !7&#! /(- *,#&++! 9&(! *&("!+ . 5"! !5#&*!/U f$ ",6. -$& /(&5! *%534 5"! -f*"7#$! *&("-*! 5"! . %6 "$)67! (&5*'Kaimal (&',

8""%5()"$% 8"'&(3 8"5$*)'"#"! 2&&".!+ (+ ,3(3! *'(3' 8&()374! *&")$5$"+&- /(&5 *&%534 %"./(&5' H22/(,% , (65.H! 5&! ,3(3! "$7 %,+ !'&0 ."!'0 (&', ("'4 (&5* !1 *&"&("!+& 8".&+$ 8

51

!"#"$% &"' -!"()"$$ , *($ +,30-40!"-"./ &"' !"0"'0-$ '".(" '1$ 5 +'(* !.'2!$ +'",- !*,23 (".2 , 40. **# +'5.500-1500'1$ .

60'& 47",. -'1273- !, 80!0(* 80%9$ -07'/"7"1. 800$"2$ 800"%09 . !"(./ *($ -$0':. -!", '0.($" !01%*".'"1- -0/'%,- 40. !"/*7!-- !, 0500$ 1($# 47",. -%9$ ;&*- -59. 0"%09-

-$0':* 0#%,- .0#'- *, -$0':- 4""0#. .0#'-$6) '"0) ",'B-2 .( *9 3"73&- +'", 8-. 80.)$. 8/-0)%*".'"1- -%!9$ -$0':- 4""0# +'",* -%!9$ (2'2- , !"%12- !"*,23. -*0&!.)--"./ !"'05! (

!"*"5/- !"*,23. 8/ +9$-." .""0#$ &2"*9 4 +"', 4$: 2'7)!"(9 5( !"25 !"'9( ( 05# !, !"%9*!"*"5/- !"*".'($- ,-0/'%,- .'0$ !, !"*0#$9 , -$0':. -0)%*".'"1-"!'#": " -*($. 80,%!- !,

-$0':- 5'"$. 2"&' 8/ -$0':- .%/"$"- 0," .#'"$ &19 *9 !0**#- -(79--0 !*5/- ,0- -0)%*".'"1- ,5 +'", !"*,23. **# +'5.-07'/"7"1. !"0%/"$"- 0,- *9 !"*,23* !"$" . ": +'5.

'"0). -.0)0 ,*- -$"2(- *9 ":* !.'2!$ 8"'1273- *9 -'")-B-1a , -0)%*".'"1- *9 -*,23-9#80'1$"*02 '73$ *9 *5"/ '53 ,0- -0/'%,- ."' !, -*0#$-.

!"#$B-2 - % &#'#(!' )"!% *"!#%+' ,+-% *"./01 &"!2031 .4 .5 #!31+&#6"4 , &#+"0#+ #64'– %.7+' &!-% ,*!#"$+% %7'5% *513'" ./.+ "0 ,%+#!-% ,""#(';!"'4 "0 , #03"/% ,""#(')89% :"*.(;*"9"06 , ,""#('#(6/% . '#(!. %+#!-% ,""#(' '#(!% ,#' %#5!6/ .4 !'7+ "64# %7'5% .7+ *!'"7 %+#!-%4(4 *"/!. ,*#6#(6/%. !"#$)E. Petersen 1989(

'7 80$002 8-. 4$:- 02 8- 800*,'10% 80,%!!03&0 80')2 , 40. '.($. **# +'5. 809&'!$"80.0)0 ,* 80.)$* 80.0)0 80.)$ .!,: !$"(* ,1($# 80,%!- 800*,'10%)near-natural ( 809&'!$

!"70#!. '!"0 ,!0%"%. &"'- !"'0-$" 80%%"($ 800$9-9# *9$*---"./ . *9 !".0)0- 0,%!. -:- 0%"9-9-0)%*".'"1 !"*,23 *9 .&' 8"&! 8002 '!," '!, *#.9 +#* *0."$ *"./- !.# , 5( 80'1$ !"'9($

80'1$"*02 '73$ ,!0$"2$- !".0)0- *9 -0/"*"1$0*2. -0"*! 8-*9 !"/*7!--9# . '"0).B-1b 4!0% 0%007", 6"& '":,. -0)%*".'"1 !"*,23 *9 !"/*7!-- !, !",'* .".'"1- *9 +'",- !*,23 4,# -0)%*

!"%"9-$ 0)& -.9 ":## -'5/"-(variance) '!"0 !"*"5/ !"*,23. ,)$% -$0':- 4""0#. .0#'- *9 '!"0 !"%12 !"*,23. 0)&" . *9 8"$032$* 20"5$ 47",. -$0,!$ -%0, +'",- !*,23 !505$* ": -109

8"'1273- ,-505$* -%0$, '!"0 -.'- ,0- +, . '"0).B-1b "0. -&0#9- +'",- !*,23 40. ,0- '!500-60080'1$ ,0*,$'"% -%0, !"/*7!-- +,!) skewed (# ,"- ()"$$- +'",-"-1000'1$ .

Frandsen et al. 7!,. !"0"/*7!- 5"( /0)$ 80%"9 80' ,80%"9 80-./" .

- ,"- -0)%*".'"1 !505$ '".( ."9& 55$ 5"(-spectral coherence , 09"$09 55$ "%0-90*,'1273- !"/*7!-- '".(!.&'$. -0)*'"2- *9 !*$'"%$- :

)2-B( 2 2

12 12

1 2

( ) (

((

)

( ) ))

f Co f

f

Qo

S fC

Sh f !

"

52

!" -12Q# $%# -quadrature spectrum ,12Co# $%# -cospectrum ,% -1 2&S S &%'()*+# &#)power spectra ( &,-%!# &,'%.$# ,-!/ %001-!1% -2 .#-coherence &,12'31!" /%!4 5'6 $%#

'7,%$ 3"'61/ &%'()*+ 8,/3//%+ 3"'61 7$ 3,-,, , 37/)31# %. %1"4%' 3-,/'%( 7! /#7/8,9 .

4%'# 3%',#1/ &,(-7%/'%(# &,,%-,!# , 69%11# 5'6#1 3,62'# 3%',#1# 7! &,,%-,!" &,'02%1#) ,-* 765-603%)0 ( ,,-,$,+%$2 5,7#3 7! #$9%3 &-,$ . 4%'# 3%',#1/ &,,%-,!# 7! 3%27*3#! 3%'17

/%( /%')/ &#&,,7$1'%- , 3%27*3#1 '3%, &,"%'$ 3%/-. 376/ $,# 3%9$## 7! 3%27*3##3,7$1'%-10 .

8,$/% %77# &,70/## 3%'17'3%, /%( '%$,3 , /!1 319%6 4%'#)gust ( 4%'# 3%',#1" 3'02%1# 7! #0,01 &%43 '%/6 3,/'1#5-60,-$,+%$2 5,7#3 7! /%') ,0, 76 3'$%31 3%)0 . !%1,! ,0, 76

3%7)1 3%4-#/)3%,'-%,9$(+ , 5,7#3%//4' +* ( /!1# '%/6 8# ,-$,+%$2 '%$3 &,7/)1u '%/6 8#% /!1# 7! #9%$3#/du dt 81./ T , $%# 6%9,1# 81.!"!

)3-B( ( )

2 ln2 ( )

max u

u u

U U T " !" # " !

$ %&' ( )

* +!

2)(u" !# $,# 3%-%!)variance ( 7!,%-,! 5%3,4 &6 4%'# 3%',#1 )cut off ( '03/ 8%3431/T 81. ,-* 76 6%9,1% ! , % -2)(u" !! 3--%+1# 3%-%!# #.)filtered variance ( 3%',#1 3%9$# 7!4%'#.

/%!,4 7! 3%$9%3##." 11 71,,) &%'()*+ ,/2 76 , '%,9/ &,$/%1B-3a , 7! 3%$9%3 &6 04,3,-$,+%$2 #,9-7%/'%( 7! #,97%1,+12#,9-7%/'%(# 7! 5'%$ 37$)+ 7! #,9)-%*" . ,-,* '3$1 3%0,01

)Finish Kopparnas ( '%,9/ &,$/%1B-3b&,-%! &,#/2 '%/6 ,4%'# 3%',#1 7! #,9)-%*" . 3%0,01#1 &,-() &,,%-,! 3%$'1% 70%1# 3%$9%37 3%1%0 %77##/%2# &6 0%$ . 7%02 3%1%)6# /,/+ '%.,*#

#"%1- 4%' 3%',#1/ ,#7%6 4%'# 3%',#1!" 8()%; $,# 3,-,,*%$ 3%-%! 0.5/ -5#,-!7 '(1 ,% -0.4/ -15#,-!7 '(1 .

!"#$ B-3 -) a ( %"! #&'( )*"()gust (+!", -),./ )' 0#$.1"23 . )' 0#$,)"(#/ )' 0,$"- ,"0 ,)(0 ".0100 !"&4 -"4' -),./ )3& 0#$1)"&!"50+!", . 0,""'( ,"0 "."".(0 ".0)3-B()(##. -!5.2/ /#/& )4 .

)b (%"!0 -"!#0( )' 0#$.1"23 -"#46! -"#),(#/.( -"%"! -"*#*( , 7#1"-1 -!84&10.* 7##- , 4"$#( 9(8"3 )' -10#1' . )' 7#0&6& -"*#*(10,22,36" -514.!.0 0&"6 )4( , )' -"1"' 740.4-0.5 )' -"!#0( )4(

50#1') !5( .)E. Petersen 1989(

#(,! 4%'# ,/!1 3$ 7017 3'4$ #743# 30%)-" &#7! 3,-,,*%$# #'%9/ !%1,! #!%6 , 3%$12%0/ $%917 83,- 5"7-Verheij et al. 13 .

#1,'.# #0! 7! ('%*1 60,1/ 5'%9 !, 4%' 3-,/'%( ,/#7 76 &,,1-,0%',%%$# &,+1%6# /%!,4 '%/6/ &,!4'31# 81./ &,,%-,!#% ,01,1 373#% . 70%1/ #,!63/ #!6- /4'- !%1,!Veers 14 , 70%1/%

Mann 15.

53

!"#$% &'(')*B:

1. Kaimal J, Wyngaard J, Izumi Y, Cote OR. Spectral characteristics of surface layer turbulence. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 1972;98:568-589.

2. Højstrup J. Velocity spectra in the unstable boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 1982;39:2239-2248.

3. Olesen HR, Larsen SE, Højstrup J. Modelling velocity spectra in the lower part of the planetery boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorology. 1984;29:285-312.

4. Højstrup J. Velocity spectra. In: Proc. IEA symposium on wind conditions for wind turbine design. Roskilde: (Available from reserch center, Julich); 1993:51-57.

5. Højstrup J, Larsen SE, Madsen PH. Power spectra of horizontal wind components in the neutral atmospheric surface boundary layer. In: Proc. AMS 9th Symp. on Turbulence and Diffusion. Roskilde; 1990:305-308.

6. Townsend AA. The structure of turbulent shear flows. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1976.

7. Frandsen S, Chacon L, Crespo A, et al. Measurments on and Modelling of Offshore Wind Farms. Roskilde: Riso National Laboratory; 1996.

8. Kristensen L, Frandsen S. Model for power spectra measured from the moving frame of reference of the blade of a wind turbine. Journal Of Wind Engineering And Industrial Aerodynamics. 1982;10:249-262.

9. Kristensen L. Power spectra and cross-spectra as seen from the moving blade of a wind turbine. Journal of Wind Engineering And Industrial Aerodynamics. 1983;12:245-250.

10. Dutton JA, Højstrup J. A probabilistic model of turbulent velocity fluctuations. In: Proc. Wind characteristics and wind energy siting Conf. OR; 1979:59-67.

11. Højstrup J, Tammelin B. Wind reasorces in complex coastal terrain. In: Proc. European Union Wind Energy Conf. Goteborg; 1996:544-547.

12. Højstrup J. A statistical data screening procedure. Meas. Sci. Technol. 1993;4(2):153-157.

13. Verheij FJ, Cleijne JW, Leene JA. Gust modelling for wind loading. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1992;42(1-3):947-958.

14. Veers PS. Three-dimensional wind simulation. In: ASME energy-sources technology conference and exhibition and intersociety cryogenic symposium. Houston, TX, USA; 1989.

15. Mann J. The Spatial Structure of Neutral Atmospheric Surface-Layer Turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1994;273:141-168.

54

!"#$%C&! !'()*$)**$+,!'-").,/!0-1)(!)2,3!!!!"# $% &'()*( $*+, )! -!'./ *'0 -!,+% 0'(1 *'0 $2!(0'3 &2#$, 04./-!/145 , '%

$'0($.55 , &'6!+ !()// -!1('25 -!5'(7 -!6/%/)'1!4'!-!(5,5 ,1 . '8 5+!3.!33. $% $,,'#5 508*5 &/8( )'/!)T) return period( , 16'//5 &/85 %'5)-!'./ +8'* ,1/ *'0 !()/ &!( . !()/

5,%# *'0 -!1('21'0!%' $'01./ ,,# 90"(!-!!2'6!+ 0!''% 78/ .!1'0!%5- -!1('2 0$'!( -!4!0*5 '"20'3 $'4'./ ,,# 90"( , "1 ,) $'*'0 '""/2) &132 -5(100!2), 03/ 5 . "'%/ 1'0!% %'5 '"20'3

!$"'+2 ,) 514)5 -'*$ -1 500 -!!* 90'%' 03/ $'+" $'0)1 ,) . 9!015, !0)4% !$,( 31/# &#,'8%) $'0($.55 $%'"20'3/ 174! -!'./ 0 .$%8 $/'1, 5+!0/% &'46( $')*0$/ '"20'3 $'4'.5) 1'"!

-,'15 0%)(/ 0$'! 5(05 0!"$ &4'%(;-) $')*0$/ -,'1( '"20'35 $'4'./ !6*# ,#( !2)5 !6*5'-20$'0*% $'2!"/ . "*'!/( $'/!,% $'*'0'/$'1!4#, 0)+5( -80 (*0 5"!/ 52+( $'4'. – -!2',+!6

-!!4'03 ,-!2+!0'5 , -!2'4!!3–52) ,# $')*0$/5 . $!0%,'45 $!8*5)polar front ( (*'0 !''+( ,) 5"!/ 52+( -!2',+!6 06'!5 -0'7 %!5 -!!2'461000+ "/ , -!2+!0'5 ,) $'/0, $'1!7/5 $'*'0 -1

'"20'3 $'4'. ,) 5,%, :%'.

3.!5 5/!"+/ 5)!0" %!5 -!'./ 0'8%( *'0 !2'$2 ,) 5!0'!"# ,) 5+!3.!33.5 $% &'*(, &/8&'6!+ $'*'0 ,) 508*5 .&# '/# -!!3.!33. -!,# -!)'0" !"#'85 5!0'3.!55 $% *$2, ,'5,,!14 $%

407'%!7 0'8%, -!'./ 0'8% 0'(1 $'2+./5!0*% . *'05 $."25 ,) $'04.()wind engineering (!33.5 508*5 &/8 %!5 0$'!( $*''05 5+!3.–"( " !24 ,1 #50 52) – 16'// ,) 10 *'0 ,) $'+"

-!'./ 901 ,1/ .25 $'+!3.!33.5 $#015( -!!2!!4'% -!(,) -!%('/ 53/,",1 , -!2'$2( )'/!) !"! ,1 '04 !!%/)Faroe Islands .(!"/ 06+ '2!5 -!2'$25 &/8 , $% &# '/#' .!.(5 $% 5%0/ 58!,2%5 9%

53!)5 -1 $'!0+!15 $'!1(5 . -!!% 5/#( ""/2 58 1"!/!"# -!0'8%( $'*'0 ,) 5+!3.!33. ,(+, -!2') -!!407'%!7 . 54!0* 501. &/8( 5"!"/5 0'!6( $%('/C-1a -!!% !2) 0'(1 – Nordradalsskard' -Glyvursnes .

:#'% $"'+2( $/+'// 52')%05 52*$5267)'/ 52!5' -!5 !24 ,1/ 03/ 1 :!0* &4'%( $14" !5!407'4'35 ,1 :!0* &4'%( $14)'/ 52!% 5!!2)5 52*$5 $%8 $/'1,"5!407'4'35 ! .

!"#$ C-1 -) a (% &%$"'' ("! &"!#)' #*+ ,10- &"./ -Glyvursnes" -Nordradalsskard )+"0 1,)'- "!+ ##2- )+#!( ,21-22 !-'$/- 1988 . ,3 ("! #-3'2 &"#*3 4#*##"$' )*(&) !"-% 4#("&+ 4#,"5#%- 67 45

)#*3) . &"/#/')"%$"- )-"5- 10%.!.) #*+ ,%' !8' . )'7 /"/', ).#0+) )+"0, !&"#- )+"3() )*(&) !(2, &"./00:4588"'&) )/'% "#,% ,/5')37 ) .b (- &#3/"( &#,2'#0.' ("! &"!#)'-Glyvursnes ,

6""#7- &",& 2,, .P #+, -3"(' P=m/(N+1) ,37-N45/') ,/"5 2") ,"-m!"/#0) !+0' 2") ) ordering number( ,3 4#%"!#2)4#5!"/') .- )!%0)' 4,%&' 4#*"&*) 1!/ !3#) ".)-21-22 !-'$/- ) 3,"3')

+-)*"#,%) &#*'#) )*#( .)E. Petersen 1989(

5/5 !24 ,1 $16'//5 $'0!105 $'+" 55'(70$'!( %!5 52')%05 52*$( 58.15!2), 03/ , !24 ,1 *'05 ()/)# 33'/$5 5"!"/5 "'!6 $% +!8*5) 9(./5 ,"7/'2, 1!75 $'!2) -76.7 03/

5!2), . 5$!5 5!2)5 52*$( $!(0!/5 $'0!5/539.25!2), 03/ ./ 5"'"/5 -!2'$25 $0".-7 -!2)5

55

!"# $%&!% '()*$ "' +(,()-*$.(/!0$ !1%& +0!23!223 +* )/!!4 . 5+!)(64*$ .(%*) 14%1!2)",23$25%(!& $ .(/!0$ !'()* )(!/ !"! 4' $ 4% 4(7#$ 5+!)6(4$ 4(& 5!6)("&35+(-!#% +()1+

)%! (0 +&*+$( . .&8$ +7(0+1 5'7 +!/-, '/(&&1% +()!$&$ +* +,+(, (8 $&*+$T $!4* +3-!!+&+()1+3$$ .)(!/1 +)!(/& $*/(+$ C-1b . !&+!)6(4$ -(+!,$ 4% $6/$$ +)(/– 4(7# 5+!)6(41 –

9# 4' +8&)& $)(/$& +!4*!/,,(730* 1()01 *!$ +()1+3$$ +!!/0,(7 5!)!", 5!'()* )(1'%( ) up u e!" . +(6!)-$ +(&#% +(*)$4 .+!, $4*# 5!#!4$+ )(1'#.&8 +"!-!4 , 4% 5!(3& 9)'&

+()!$&u ,+(!3-! .,!$4 -( )p u3 .)-* $)8- .&8 4' 9!4%$4 .+!, $8 )%0 +)8'1 . +-* $6!)- )(1' '/(&& .7(*1·T#$ ('(10 * ,(4# )&1 2

1 2T e T eu u! !$(*:

)1-C( 22 1

1

·T

U u lnT

%& '

$ ( ) *+ ,

% )(!/1 $!3)6)$ (0 4% '(7!%$ *($ C-1b ./(+ $+(*' +410+& 1()01 $*" +(0!,#21 %(&!% !(!23!223+$&("#( +""(1 $)'3 4*# ')(*& 4#4 +(3-!!+$ .(6# +()-* +(41(0& .,$ $*/(+$" 56 *!$ 4

!$& 4' +'/(1&$ $8!4,*4 +(%!6) +)3-:-4 +("!"& 4' (* -() +() .;(314 )(1' (8$ $8!4,*$& .+!, -(+7 )(8*1 $"!"&10'0)0$ !,7 4'& )2& , %$4 9!4 4' 5!)-* 5!$16( 5!1()0 5!!7)6(7(2 5!)(8* 4*

+(-()$ 342* +2!% !"!4.

)(!/C-1b (8$ $8!4,*1 +!,!!7(* $!'1 $*)&–"&,% $7!)-$ $)'3$ )(!/1 $"C-1a !)&64 *!$ $!3)6)$ (04 :(-&);)6$ 4% $,(!4'$ +!,&!$ $,!71 .( 5*5!%&+%& $!3)6)$ +*/(+1 ) *44 $1%(-%

$)'3$ !,(+, (5!410& )(!/1 ""&,% 6(3$& $)'3% C-1a 4# '/(&&1 %-)+$4 $)(&* 300 5!,% 9)'4 .54(*9)' +)3-( +!2,((4) *4 $!/0!")7 (8 .*$% 0!3$4 0) )+(,()!' $'7(+4 9!% $8$ !"!-!$

!'()!*$ )*% )%*& $,(%5)+*1 (""&,% 5!!,(/!0$ . .()+7 5!!0 *44+(!'1 $4*# , .!!/4( .!1$4& :(-!"#%'()!* 4% +()!"+$ +* .!&* .7(*1 +(8-4 ! 4% $)8- .&81 .(/!0 50 $"!"& +7(0+ 9!)/ $,%

0!73& $#()* ,+("!"& 4% !,6(&($ 4(4#& 9(+& 12!$ $"("&.

!"#$% &'(')*C:

1. Petersen EL, Jensen NO. Storms: statistics, predictability and effects. In: T. Horlick-Jones, A. Amendola and R. Casale (eds), Natural Ridsk and Civil Protection. London: Chapman and Hall; 1995:147-177.

2. Cook NJ. The Designer’s Guide to Wind Loading of Building Structures: Background, damage survey, wind data, and structural classfication. Michigan USA: Building Research Establishment, Dept. of the Environment, the University of Michigan; 1985.

3. Jensen NO, Mann J, Kristensen L. Aspects of the natural wind of relevance to large bridges. In: Proc. first international Symp. on Aerodynamics of Large Bridges. Copenhagen; 1992:25-32.

4. Abild J, Nielsen B. Extreme values of wind speed in Denmark. Roskilde: Riso National Laboratory; Riso-M-2842 ; 1991.

56

!"#$%D&! !!'(()*%(+!'(+,-./!WAsP!!!"#$%&#&'( )&*+ ,""&-. ,""+"-/*! ,""&0"1!& 2&$! .&$"!+1 3&&"4+ ,,"-(/+1 ")4- .. ,"&5+ $.*-

."1&+"1 ."62. $"1" 3#&*( .#+ 7&.+!2&$ ,! -8 -8 55(.!- !#+-1 ($ $#5+.&)")+ , .&#"#9 ,8 !0"*1."18+ . !-"(&! &6 !)(&8$ .#+ ,&/+(1 !0(!-./"&)+ 2&)&*+ ,:")8 1+.1.1 !'"1 2.#-

,""$&6*! ,"0&.0(")4.. $&(8 ./"&)+ !#+ (12- -"#"9#5 $&6* .")46 .&18- .* !"! ,"-)&+ :"5&!- 7"$912! 7$&*( ,""&0"1 .8#1!( ,"(12.+5&#5 !"#$%&#&'( ,""&0"1&)!8(% -8+ !+"$6( , !8#1!( 34 &+4&

2&$- ,""6"# ,"+&52+ -1 ),"0(+ &+4.&+&2& ( .&2.&# !-* ,"-)&+ & &(-&1) .-(&!(Risoe( , !'"1- !0&4+!".&2&$! 5-'* .'"1". !'"1! .04&.( .+1&"+WaSP ( .$*&.+!-E. L. Petersen & Troen

1989 1.!) !4#! !6 !'"1 -,&2.( '$)0'5- &'/#. ,"(-1 "01 .--&4 !'"1!) $&"9D-1( –

1. ."$&6* 2&$ .#+ .$"9" .%9""+.

2. $.*( .&2&$! .&%-#.! -1 /"&)+ "&62 ,1- 2&$! .#+( 1&+"1.

!"#$ D-1 - %"&"!' ()*+ %*#,WaSP - -#,.,. -##!/(".*+ '.#!0 #)1". #12' %+ 34%) %"#.)"5' %"1#1. 3",+!' 3""#26)')7. #/)2 .(%!$"8, %5$##.' %#!"0+' &"!' %/. 9"%. ,'*. #/)2 ".$7 )7 !0"& 9#)'%' ,

8' &*,' +% 9"%6 '#"$!' '1"48) -##*8"")!' -#8"%86 ,".#,6") . 9"%.)E. Petersen 1989(

!0&4+ &6 !'"1" ."40* !-&#4 !"9-&#$'5/*."/#&*&) "the double vertical and horizontal extrapolation method“ .(

!"#$%& '(#& --&4 ,"*(! ,"(-1! .. .* --&4 *&!& 2&$! .#+ .$"9" ) $&"9( !-8+ "#-4 ;2!D-1(:

I. .&".01 ($ 2&$ .&)")+ .1$+ ,"0&.0 :&5"*)! "U z ,14 -# $/U m s$"!+ *"!& 2&$! .&-# $z m

!)")+! !(&% *&!(

II. ,"--&4! ,""+&/+ !$(%! "'/#* "#- .&)")+! 3&/".:

57

i. !""#$%&$&' !"()#'– *+&, linear BZ model 2 -&$ ./'0 $&12"3# *2 .14&30 .&21% *2 *+&,0 5"51"$'"3"*0*4 Jackson & Hunt 1975 3 .

ii. 0 ""&3"4 .2#45&#5- -(40 –5&#5-0 .&$"0, .'"/, *u 0+&+,0 .&$"0,0 "#*4&,"4 6&.

1 !+), .7$20& 2&1) 01&% $&12 ",."$%&* *&1% .174 *+&,5&#5-",&), . *4 07$200-0 8(4 .2#40& *&1%0 .174 *"#&$# *2 2)$)0, !)! "0...! z,z 0+"+, .3-. *71 ( "#*

-0 8(4&".340 2/&,,0 !.

iii. !"*&47, .2#40-0+"+,0 .3-. .1$)1 !"31,& !"/2 .,%&+7

III. .&3)&.,0 -&$0 .&"&$"0, .$921 ."$&9' ."#&$(5&'% -&$ .#, .""31 ,2“ 0,"$90 .-301 4&,"4 " ."#&$(5&'"%0–*&1%0 .174 '"41 :-* .&-&7* 5"*&"$&) .&-&7 ;"1 *)4, "&&"4 .

! "#$% !&$"4 04234&,6#&0,1 6' 0,"75 0.&'1 ,$)-30 $.'1 !"'3.0 "#* . $,&*7– $-'* 0*1).04."$&9'0 -&$0 .#, , $.'0 *4 !""."57.0& !""#$%&#&(0 !"'3.0 8&$/1 01 !"4,.4,) 8"25

2.7$)-,0 .2/01 ( "+7 $.'1 .&-&$0 .&%*#.0 ."9-. .' *1)*) $&"/1 0(, :-0D-1 .( 0,750 03&7, *"2* .$'&.,0"Observational wind atlas methodology" .&+"+, .4$ *2 $&,'7 .55&1,&

.&".",' -&$ ,!"3$. *2 !"$(,&,3', ..)#5, 03"' .&+"+,0 .&,7 !"1$ !"$&9'14 ;&&"7, , 0("4 0$/&3*"2* .$'&.,0 &9* 0*"1), , !"*+&, 5"51 *2 -&$0 "3&.3 .' .$/"",0!""$#5&,('!"'*, *2 !",4&",0

1-$ 0+", 03)$.&" !"$(,&*") .&', +2 .&$42 *4 . 03&7, 09 0+", 03)meso-scale , !"*+&,1 4&,"4& 03&7, -&$ .&+"+, !&),1 &*'numerical wind atlas . !'.01 !"3&7, &*' !"*+&,meso-scale models

) -#53 &'$E .(

*+&,WaSP !""$$0 '* !"$&9'* $&),1 +2&" ) 03&"*20 ./14,1 1&.70 .&$,*&"/1 $D-1( , $&1247 +1*1 05, $&,"4 *2 !"55&1,4 !""3(4# !"*+&,1 4,.40* 0*-.01 2/&0 !""$$0 !"$&9')mass

consistent models( .05, $&,"4 "*+&,0#&#/ +&', -&$ .&+"+, .4$ *2 !"7,.5, , $4' .' .++&, 00&1% )"#5, 0"/&*&9$1 !""$$00 !"$&9'0 "3# *2 -&$1 !""&3"40 "+7;-1'* ."3 !"$-' !""&3"4& !")&

0,"$90 ;&&"7& .&$"0,1.05,0 $&,"4 .'&&4, ;&$.# , ".*-.0 4&-"3, !""&3"4 !&,"3",* 04"$+ 8&$/1*74&,,"*4, !",.&+"+,0 ;"1 $5-0 .' . 04"%0.'90 0*5#3 64,01 0#&#/ .&+"+, .4$1 6$&/0 1)2

'* ;#&'1"42, , 4,.40 .&-&$0 5*('&0"%&*&+&.,1 0$'&.4 *"2* !""$$0 '* !"$&9' $&12 , $4'7 $&12 !""$$0 !"$&9'&2/&1;."30 *77 0#&#/ .4$1 .&+"+, . !01 !"$&9'0 .' %&&5* 0"0 "$&),0 ;&37.0 &2/&1

"#* .&+"+,0!"3&"$("$)!04*7 , 0,4&" *"2* .$'&.,0 0("40 *2&#1 6' !%!"17$&,0 !"$&9'0 $&12 ,09 *+&, !"17$&, 4,, !"$&9' $&124 ;1&047!"'." '* .

0 0("40$'&.414-, .37&.1 0,4&" 4 '"0 !% 03&7,0 WaSP . 0#, "3&.31 .4,.4, 0("40"+4 .&2#400 1&4"- !4* -(40 5&#5- *4 .&%*#.0 !"**&70 !""*("%5&#5-0& 0"#$%&#&(0 * *2 .&$"0, 0-&$ . 0("404&,"4 04&2 0+"+,0 .&+&)3 1"15 ."$'*&# .4$1 ) .' !),* !"/&$ !01 .&+&)30 &'

"340 1*41 -&$0 .&3"1$&(( ,0+&)30, !")-$.,4 *77 .+$&"& .7*&0 1&4"-0 .&#"#/4 67 ,01'. 67* !0 5&#5-0& 0"#$%&#&(04 !"1&$) $.&"1 !"2"#4, 0"&/$0 0+&)3*0$&/101$0 $.&"1 .

!&"7!*&20 "1-$1 -&$ .&3"1$&( !&)",* ($+3(50 03"0 &9 0("4 , '"0 &1 .&*&1%0 6'.)+/&,&+" !"2 :*77$.&" .17$&, .$)-30 0"#$%&#&(04 $.&" !"+- !"2&#"4 .*21& , 670)",'3"+0$ 0,"$90 *4 0)&-

*+&,0, $.&""$'"3"*0$.&" .&*&+% .&'"%40& .

0 ++,-RIX )$#1 $'&.,02.7 4,4, "+71)* *4 !"2&/"1* ++, * WAsP . 09 ++, 03&7,orographic performance indicator 5,6 , '&0&0 ;"1 4$#07 $+%&,-RIX !"3&.3 4" &$&12 $.'0 *4

.3."3 ."9-.0 &$&12 $.'0 .,&2*)RIX# .(50 .' ..* *&7" 090 ++,0 "3""#&'0 *+&%0& 0'"%40 *4 ;,"0*4 , *4 0+&120 .#(2,* :&-, &3"04 !&),1 '/,3 !"$.'0 +-'47WAsP , .&'$* ;."34 "#7 $&"/17.

58

!"#$ D-2- )a ( %%&RIX! #!'#(#)* +!,"-* ). WAsP/"!* 0#)1' ,2!3*4 *'#5. )"& .& 3%#&-5 0#!,' " )5"6!"-4-2,-!$4

7,8) .b ( %%&RIX42!"& !,"#* !,'* ). 5.* )"& /"!* ,"!#*& ,#7/,4 *'# . 0#(",( 0,"'

"&2(a) . )E. Petersen 1989b(

!"#$% &!'() '*+$"',- D-2a ,$). -"$'.- /''.0 &'- '$#'('% -RIX!1"$0 !"$'02- 0#'3)0 &'-% .0 &'- )$*00 /#-RIX&4. #"0 ,0(4. 0#'3)0 ,() /# /3/'-+$"2 /'$!#0 ' .5+2 0$!' ,# / $!#6"1''0

)1"$ '("!( "(% )' "'%7 (1"4) , "'%7 $!#0" !7,-!2-+$"2 #"0 !'81!0 , &!'! !'81!0!+$70 $!' 1"$0 !"$'02%0'3$(#0 !."*!% /3 &+%" .- $"',D-2b !"#$% &!'($)*#) !'81! '$#'('% %9"22 %-.% 0'3$(# !."*! !.'"92/'-+$"2 /'$"8# $"-7 /3 !'61' ,'%7 $!#0 9"7 %+ "/'%.# '("!( /'2''. "'%7 $!#0"

02"9 &*"#- -+$"2 $"8#- /'#,2( !'81!0 !# !")7% /'(''("72)0 992 '*%-RIX( . !"#$% &!'() '*+ #23"9%'('60 &"'6'(029,10 !"("$1#0 /'()02 , $!# 6"1''0 $!#02 '!"72)2 &*"#- -+$"2 !"1* %%+ 5$9-

!'81!0 !')7( "'%# , '"*,) '*+ !"#'3) !"%-.!2" $"',2D-2, &*"#- &+%')729"2- 5$", )' %CFD #%2.

!"#$% &'(')*D:

1. Petersen EL, Troen I. European wind atlas. Roskilde: Risø National Laboratory; 1989.

2. Barnard JC. An Evaluation of Three Models Designed for Siting Wind Turbines in Areas of Complex Terrain. Solar Energy. 1991;46(5):283-294.

3. Jackson PS, Hunt JCR. Turbulent wind flow over a low hill. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 1975;101(430):929-955.

4. Mortensen NG, Landberg L, Troen I, Petersen EL. Wind Atlas Analysis and Application Program (WAsP). vol 2: User’s Guide. Roskilde: Risø National Laboratory; 1993.

5. Mortensen N, Bowen A. Improving WAsP predictions in (too) complex terrain. Proceedings of the 2006 European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition. 2006. Available at: http://www.risoe.dtu.dk/rispubl/art/2007_177_paper.pdf.

6. Mortensen N, Rathmann O, Tindal A, Landberg L. Field validation of the :RIX performance indicator for flow in complex terrain. 2008:1-9.

7. Bowen A. Exploring the limits of WAsP: the wind atlas analysis and application program. Proceedings of the 1996 European Union Wind Energy Conference. 1996.

8. Mortensen N, Peterson E. Influence of topographical input data. 2001:1-4.

9. Postech, Kier. Introductory note IEA R&D Wind – 61st Topical Expert Meeting. S. Korea; 2010. Available at:

59

http://www.ieawind.org/Task_11/TopicalExpert/61/Introductory_Note_Complex%20Terrain.doc.

10. Rodrigo J, Avia F. Summary of IEA R&D Wind – 61st Topical Expert Meeting. Postech, S. Korea; 2010.

60

!"#$%E&! !'(()*+*,*-./!'(+0*/!!

!"#$%&# '#(

!"# $%&"&'&!(# ")&#" ,NWP model) Numerical Weather Prediction( , $*&+*, -'&. /$0&'1 +&'$1# '&(2&& '&,3 14/ ,+#$&5# 6#7 +)&2* '&,3 +&0"1& 1'&('4#(1 1)/ . +!7 +#&3"'&,3

+$#&$ +$70+, -'&. 6$! 0&'1 8$"2! +9'31 .17 1'2#, 8$$(*&&"'8$!,1 14/1 $!*+:

! ($",+1 $*&+*)DEM ( +$59+1&)5&450 -'&! .( /&#$/ -&+# -$'31" 6+$* 5&4501 -'&! +!1$0#.1 $&5$9& 32'211.

! !18$$*&.$01 +&0&91 "/ 8$"2 ,:0"1 1)/ &! +&"&,%, 1#$'71 +&)/ ""9 -'), , +&%"4+1&/#/1 +*$'2.

1"0+11 $!*+8$/&')1 ")&# '&,3 mesoscale$",&"% $'#&* ")&## ""9 -'), 8$",2+# , 81&'&7!, 8$"2!1 +! %.$$" 8$'&#! .1$."&#$51 '&,3 8&$, 6#71 +'$0, !$1 1,&/0 1)&2* , 50$,

0#"/#/1 +*$'2 "/ 8$'&7 .*/$8$%.$$#1 8$!*+1 +'$0,, +&,$/0 1 , 1'&', 1($/ 8&$9 13&)$ !"+'$0,"+$#$"2! +%.$$# 1$."&#$5 . 8$"'%&# 8$+$3"36519&'! 2$45# 14&2+ -&+# 8$#$ 2–5 , &!

$$"!'($* 81 8$$'45&#(!1 8$!*+1 3.&##,/ 8$0$*#8) 13$2/ &! 10$'7 +&3/" 8$#$!+# '#&"9 .(1"0+11 $!*+& 14/1 $!*+ -') ")&#" +&5*9* +&$#$"2!1 +&)$)#1.

8$$3.#!1 ,0&'1 $&&2, 1#$'71 "3 +&$'2$31 +&34/11)mid latitudes ( +&0&'1# 13$%#(!1 "/ ,&9$/1#& +&$4&'(5&!$%11'45&# .0" 8$1 6$, 1'&('4#( $"),1 8$$+&3#/# +&$1" 8$"&9$ ;&

;&01 +,'2, 8$'+! '&,3 .

!"#$%&) *%%"+

8$$'45&#(! 1#$'7 $")&# %&&$5" +&*&/ +&($/ 1"$9# 1!,1 1#$/'1 , $""9 64&!,/96$#$" "!#/# 1#$/', 1")% ")&#1 "/ +&$9&,$51:

Kinematic (mass consistent) ,hydrostatic ,non-hydrostatic Dynamics

linear, non-linear Advection

diagnostic, prognostic Time domain

Microscale, mesoscale, synoptic Spatial scale

Neutral, non neutral Stratification

Frictionless, turbulent closure Friction

Analytical spectral, grid point (finite volume, finite element)

Formulation

Flow model, wind climate model Type

!$.#, +&')%11*1 %&&$51# +&9,&5# '+&$ 61 +&"".!#%&)" :Wasp 6 ")&# !&1'!$*$"$ , -! 1$.2!'(*$!16$,")&#& +$(!(5&')$11 +&,$.$" ")&#1 8*$! 0(/1 $*4 5&450 $&*$/ $$'!$*$"8 .;5&*, ,

13,% ,$,5 1#$'71 ")&# "/WAsP) ($",+1 +34/1 ($"!'($* ,&9$/ 0$*# , 0&'1 +&'$1# -!8$$"!'($* !" 8$!*+ '&,3 !$1 ),&3 !&1 15$5, "3 +3.&##1.

61

!"#$%&' (%&"() *%#%'+

!"#$%&'!"(%) !"*+&# !"&",-& %("%+). !".+%& /)&'*0* !'#) -%#*.&'& 0#1 '2+#$%& #3* -%)4() -%1(''%.

"#$%&' -mass consistent !(", -%"&("$ !%5(&%& -%,%%)& !"##%3 !")&-)& ')4&#% ' -%$"$&*'#1-' "(%-(3 -%$%0( 267&* 1%2 , !' 87%(* 2),3 '7&' 2%&") -,%%)&* !")&-)&"$3

4+*#*4 '"+#%625(", $&' -%$%0( 9"* '&"2:' '$) 2%'$" )4""-#1-'' )%1"('& !""%(") !%&"("& "( . %* *+&# !"&",-& !(", %#, !"#$%&-%$"$&' 9"* *2 012& %, -1, '$"$& -&""0. '$"1"' /2$' 93 %&3

'*%':" %#, !"#$%& ,"' '&"2:* !"0%-"( 2),3 '$"$&' -%(1-) /3 '6%6+ '3 '$"$& -%(1- -)2-%(1*,&%##' !"0%-"(' -, 7 .

""5,57%2$"' !"#$%&*!) hydrostatic ( #0)& "%%)* -6#1%& -"3(,' !%5(&%&' -,%%)&5,57%2$"'" . !"#$%&!"15)* "2%:,' 1%2' !"#0, *%)"1# !"&",-& '#,& !"#%$. -10 ~0"& .

"5,57%2$"'' '1('* )%&")'- "!%2.!"(50 !"2'% -%4*. #4& 2*4&* '+,'' #) 9%3( ,# !%0"&# , /3 2'' -.76* '2*.'' ,") !%0&*) 1%2' $2%&*) 2'' $+* ,") #*0-" )lee side.(

"%(")' -, !"*)1& !""2,"("# !"#$%&'u&* 1%2' -%2"'&& *+7%1""' U . "52%,"- 96%,*-%(50 -%426' 2%*4 -%60- %##' !"#$%&' 7"7** -%$&%4) -%1('' , $%4 #3 #)&#'/ 0.2u U ! .!#%,

96%,*"324 2%*4 !. ")4& '/u U $4 0.5 9""$4 !"#*0&!"&"%7& !"20&*%#4* -%,+%- /24 - .

!""2,"("# !"#$%&'&"2: "0%-"( -%:1# !"#%3" !(", 3 !")12-&) 2), 4020' #) 4%6")' '%*. *%20*&-0.3 . !"#$%&""2,"("#! *%)"1 -%#%3"% 54%& 9&: !")2%$ 93#% -"*%)"1 !"#"4" $%,&

-%5%)6)WAsP *)1& #4 '0$& -%16* ;%2" PC"(2$%& .("$3'&"2: "0%-"( -%:1# !"2%:,* !"22' %*2%5' -, *)1#%"#,2 96%,* '"+(# ,1%2 -%%1* -%("*2%5 -*04 #) !"#$%& 7"(3'# 8,% , /2%+ )"

-%,%%)& -, !"2-%6) !""2,"("# ,# !"#$%&*Navier-Stokes-%,#&' .

#4 $%,& '4"6)& "*%)"1' #$%&' #) '#,07'!"506,' "%+2) -%1%3'% #%#3#%* . /3#)&# & 950 %32%,) #$%&*-10 ~0" /2%+ 9", &#%#3#7"#%"2%0 "506, 8 .-,: -&%4# 27%1& ',+%-3 -%+,'

%)-%"-%'& 9("' "5,57%2$"' #0)& "% "#$%&* -%*%)1% microscale#,3 '. '$"& '(0* '"+#%&"7* "56%("7) mesoscale( /%6' *+&' ,"5(,("&%$% *%)1 7"#%"2%0 13 #0)& "%%) -1('* )&-)'# 9-"( /,

-"5,57%2$"'&*%)"1' -%,+%-* 4%.6# "#*.

"(6 -*20* !""5(,("&%$ /%3"1' -%1%34020' .-,: -%2&# 2%,- !4 !"#$%& -%1%3 #) "(5)615)' "(6* /%3"1'# %, ##3 !2%,"- ,# ,' !"2,-&'267%&5,* '&"2:' -%.'(-' -, *5" .-,: 9%%"3&

4020' "(6# '*%20' '*3)# #*.%& '&"2:' #4 /%3"1' #) '46)'')9 .%(*87 , "%(") #) 2%,"-' !. -%4*. "(6 #4 2*4&* '"+(#%*2%5'#*0-&"2%,"-& ' /%3"1 -%1%3 -271 ) 167( %,2B.(

!")&-)& !""2,"("#' !"#$%&' *%22%,"-*'""2%6 -%"+&2%67(25% "#25067 )Fourier ( "$3* #65#-"06%,' '&"2:' -%2"'&* !""%(") ,!""2%:1& -%#%*. -1(' "$3 /%-7 . !""267%&5, !"#$%&

mesoscale "#$%&% microscale) CFD ("6%7 5(&#, -%5")% '20* 16(* !")&-)& , "6%7 16( %,)finite element/volume .(

* #$*'' %##' !"#$%&* )%&")* -%#0' 2%*4 20"4* "5(%%#2 !"#0, "#$%&# '&"2: "#$%& 9""$3 !"%7& 2%:,* 1%2' !"#0, -, -%:1# .WAsP"&"#0, #$%& ,%' ,4+*&) #4 -%2")" -%"+#%6"(&

2-,* '$%$&' -"-() *2' 1%2' -%.#6-' . #*0# #0 ,# 93#%-2:4* '20& 2%*4 '&"2: 25)& -":1- %"3 #) !"%7&,* '6"+& 1%2 9%2- .!""267%&5, !"#$%& -,: -&%4# "#$%&% CFD'&"2: "#$%& !' , 2),

!-2:4* #*0# "$3 /"2+ !"#0,' -,4+*# !"(%-(' #3 -, 8%7,#% !"(""6,& '&"2: "*+& #) '"+#%&"7 %"$1" . -%77%*& '(3%- -%#"*1 267& !()" !%"3CFD-,: -%)4# -%#.%7&) 10–12.

'"+#%&"7' -25&* '"%#- !"(%)' !"#$%&' 9"* '2"1*' ,*%)"1' "*,)&* !. %&3 , !"*,)&'2%:,' 2%*4 !"&""0' !"#0,' "(%-(% !"")%(,' . ,# %, !"271 !"(%-(# 8"#1- %(", *%5 #$%&!"0"%$& .

62

!"#$% microscale model-meso

!"#! $%&'( ")*, +""$$, +"$&-% $&.#-,! /'"0 %! +".*$&1+""$%"0"! +"!2&1. (1'( , "!2&1CFD+"1"%'1, +, . 22&1',! 3"$4 +1# '&0&(%$, '&"#., '5%'#. !2&1 '4$, CFD '$"5. %",

,!5',,& ,)(, "%0' . ,$6., 5)0'&"0.!1 '&%) +# %7)&6 !!* 3$2. &0", . '&2"21 /"%( /&&"*1,$6., 5)0 !( '&%), "0) !# '&"08&1&, , !( ,*$#, #4.! 3$&4 ("'&2"21, ")! ,)(, "%0''&1""6, ,

'&"'2&60 !!* 3$2. /,( )# +"&71 $'%. "*0% !")&$) &% +"$91&10% +# ,2"21 "2&1# '18&2*" "SoDAR &% LiDAR(. !2&1 /". .!(! %", &- ,"#. +# '&22&1',! '&9"(, '5%CFD !2&1!

"$)7&19%mesoscale ,,)(, "%0' '% /&$5%,1 !.6!& . +"!2&1( /&&"*1 &", +""$)7&19% 2"1' %!! +""08&1&, ,!5',& ,)( "%0' '$"4" $&.# +""'2&60 +"0&'0 .&!"( !( ,"#., +# 22&1',! +"*"$4

"#2"1. +"$&5" ,, +&5' 5')',-data assimilation 13,14 ,0#1 ''! 2#&0( .&!"(!,- . /". .&!"(, !2&1mesoscale !2&1! microscale %&,(!* ) &1* "$%"0"! !2&1 !(1!WAsP ( '&0&$'" /'&0+")7&0 :, !2&1-mesoscale'&")&$97&%8, '&5&$,1 ,%4&'* "$&-%, +"!6%, '% !211 , ,$.8,,&

.".7 ,1"$-1 ,%4&'*+"!&28 +"$, "7*$ ,+".5$ +"61#& ., !2&1-microscale ,$.8,, '% !211 +""1&61, +"#&)"(,& '&#.8,1 ,%4&'* ,1 7&)75 ""&0"(& +"!&(*1+""1&6 .!&28 %&, ".&("5, /&$'",

&1 '$-#.( /&&"*1 !2mesoscale("5 %' 3$&% +# !( ".&5-106 " /'"0 1!&28 59(. !)9! 7"0*,!& &. &(#0( '&.$ '&2"21 , 261',! -%&. ,"4&!&-$,,&.8 $'&" )+"$91-+"$91 '&$(# ( !2&1 '$-#.

"1&61microscale . &-* ,("8! %18&2'$%&'1$&"4 "2" !# +" E-1& -E-2.

!"#$ E-1 - $%&!"'( )'"() %* , %'#( %+,- #&")"!"./( )'"( 0#- -)1(%meso scale #(",( 2"! )'"( 0#-) CFD .Murakami et al. 2003

15!!

* ,$&24&$)! %18&2 %", &- !(1! /". .&!"(,KAMM 16! -WAsP 5&$, ')1 '""0.! (1"(( +""$41 !(17 , !( ,"4&!&-$ +#7.56 " 1'1""6, .-KAMM) ,2"1 ,06. "$)7&19%, !2&1,mesoscale( ,. (&1"(&-WAsP !.6! "2* !( ,"4&!&-$ 100 ,", +,. +"$&-%. $91 3$&4 . ,-"!0%$'&" '6"&21 .!, 5&$, ')1 %", ')7&0 %18&20. !( ,1&2 .&!"(1 ,'(#0( '"0&MC2 +# WAsP ,

,$61. !( ,"4&!&-$. /&0.! !( ,%!1 5&$ ')1 %", '")&7, ,%4&', ,-100$91 18 .

, !2&1-mesoscale, 96"&$) 3&'1 +"84""1 +""'0( .$ +"!6% "0&'0. (1'(1 -Reanalysis ")! ,"8&!&2&91,1"%'1 ,&- !(1!!( statistical dynamical approach to regionalization of large

scale climatology 2 . ,)(,& ,!5',, "%0' :7&%( %2&&! $&1% %&,( /&&"*1 "9"$6 %&, ,- .!(,1"%'1, '&8!)',, '% ,0&*0 84""1 $5."( . ,6&!5. 3$&4 (" +"'"#! +"096 59( "''! $&-% !(

$'&" ,( '"1"!6% '&8!)', $4""! "2* '84""1 $'&" .&9-% &'&% '%&$ .:7&0. ,,")$8&$&%, $&%' 7&)75, 3$&% '&8!)',&+"70*&1 !( ,"4&!&-$. 5-106 "1 .

63

!"#$ E-2 -% &##'"(")"*+, -#,".#/% !)0 (. #*+10 *"*!0 -KAMM/WAsP, ()"+ ,"(#.( 2+'")1 mesoscale ()"+ -3 microscale )E. Petersen 1989b(

! "#$%-mesoscale &'$% "( '$)*+ ", -'*%+$./$+!$ !0,$ !"1+! 2.3, !42562556! 7* #12 "( ", +$12(,! ",-'*%!"1+! 2.3+ /!0,, 103) '+. "() 1$'! +$8"0+! )$,21" 72,%,%

2)$,21!.

+$./$+! 1$+23 -,%! 1$' +0% +'2/2 '$)*!,*3" !%$#) -observational wind atlas . !,*3 ) ,$%2, "#$%WAsP"$"(" 2#( )+! ", !*0,!! +. '+$2 !!$)8 !2/$"$9') +26(+!$ 52" "( '$)* !0%!) :$3)" ", 1$'! +0% '$)* ",%" !,*3, 20(18 '$2/) (E-3 .:20$"1" ,:+23 "#$%) ,$%2, +$,*"

WAsP "2),) +2%$4%! 52")+!$ +26(+! ", !*0,!! +. "5)"! "#$% ", !2/$"$9')-mesoscale '$/2" 2#(+2'$9. +2%2"4. !0% .:+23 :(% '1." !3%% ")4" 723$, 6$061 2'$9. '$)* +$0% '06% ) 20(

722'/% '$)* !,*3,17.() 78 !" #$%"$"&'() *+&, -((.& : ,)&/,+ ).!, +'2/2" !,%2, $9 !28$"$#$+%!0%! ,2( 7. ."") ,$%2, "#$%mesoscale – .". observational wind map +$#2#%! -%6 "*

+$%224!19 .

'+$2 :54 '$9. "$#2% '$)* , '%$"(*$/2) micrositing ,! "#$% +$./$+) 72,%+,%-mesoscale ! "#$% '$)* !"1+!$ !0, 2.3+(-micrositing . $%( 2'.232" "#$% '$)* !,*3 !9WAsP, '$)* $.

2'.232" ." "#$% , :'+$0 '%$"(CFD4 .*" 23$+3) ,$%2, 2mesoscale +2)$,21! +,'! +. #4%" :+23 ! :'+$0 ",-CFD9." 2612 :54 '$+ ,)$,21 :%9) -$61"$ '+$2 +42$#% !2/"$%26 ',0." :20$"1" $.

)$,21 1( $+$. 7*14 .;6$3) ,(!" :+23!0,! 2.3+) 722%.32# 722$32, 623 20" +28$"$'$.5%! +291+! , ),1"$ .%8$#")'*$ '4$) ", !%2'9 2.3+) 1$' +$32)'$5 ", +$'$, +$8!3+!) 722$32,20.

64

!"#$%E-3%&"'()%)*%+"!,%-./%%%01Garrad Hassan 2011218%%

65

!"#$% &'(')*E:

1. Wieringa J. New revision of Davenport Roughness Classification. In: Proc., 3EACWE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.; 2001.

2. Frey-Buness F, Heimann D, Sausen R. A statistical-dynamical downscaling procedure for global climate simulations. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. 1995;50:117-131.

3. Dennis Eliot et al. New US Wind Energy Potential Estimates. NREL, AWS truepower (TM), NREL/PR-5500-50439, 2010:1-13.

4. Al-Yahyai S, Charabi Y, Gastli A. Review of the use of Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) Models for wind energy assessment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2010;14(9):3192-3198.

5. Marti I, San Isidro M, Cabezon D. WindPpower Prediction in Complex Terrain: from the Synoptic Scale to the Local Scale. In: Torque from Wind.; 2004. Available at: http://www.cener.com/documentacion/Wind power prediction in complex terrain-DELFT 2004.pdf.

6. Mortensen NG, Landberg L, Troen I, Petersen EL. Wind Atlas Analysis and Application Program (WAsP). vol 2: User’s Guide. Roskilde: Risø National Laboratory; 1993.

7. Barnard JC. An Evaluation of Three Models Designed for Siting Wind Turbines in Areas of Complex Terrain. Solar Energy. 1991;46(5):283-294.

8. Xabier Pedruelo Tapia. Modelling of Wind Flow Over Complex Terrain Using OpenFoam. 2009. M.Sc Thesis, University of Gavle

9. Hunt J, Leibovich S. Turbulent Shear Flows Over Low Hills. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 1988. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qj.49711448405/abstract.

10. Meteodyn. METEODYN: Meteorology and Dynamics. Commecial Wind-CFD software site. Available at: http://www.meteodyn.com/en/software/meteodyn-wt.html. Accessed August 14, 2011.

11. CENER. CFDWind 2.0. Commecial Wind-CFD software site. 2010. Available at: http://secure.cener.com/documentos/F_CFD_Wind.pdf.

12. Buckley R. WindSim | Maximize production. Minimize loads. 2009. Available at: http://www.windsim.com/documentation/WindSim_Brochure.pdf.

13. WRF. The Weather Research&Forecasting Model Website. Available at: http://www.wrf-model.org/index.php. Accessed August 21, 2011.

14. Yamada T. Downscaling Mesoscale Meteorological Models for Computational Wind Engineering Applications. The Fifth International Symposium on

66

Computational Wind Engineering (CWE2010), Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA, May. 2010:23-37.

15. Murakami S, Mochida A, Kato S. Development of Local Area Wind Prediction System for Selecting Suitable Site for Windmill. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2003;91(12-15):1759-1776.

16. Adrian G, Fiedler F. Simulation of unstationary wind and temperature fields over complex terrain and comparison with observations. Beitrage zur Physik der Atmosphäere. 1991;64:27–48.

17. Mortensen N., Hansen J., Badger J., Jørgensen B., Hasager C., Paulsen U., Hansen O., Enevoldsen K, Youssef L., Said D. Wind atlas for Egypt: measurements, micro-and mesoscale modelling. Proceedings of the 2006 European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition, Athens, Greece, February. 2006;27.

18. Garrad Hassan. The National Wind Atlas of Lebanon. 2011:1-64.

19. !"#$%" %&'( ,%)* !+,( ,!,'$% -%,# .+(%#,' .$%- ),/%&( *+0( :-'%1-$ '/&- .2003 .

20. Gross G. Numerical Simulations to the Diurnal Variation of Wakes Behind Wind Turbines. Meteorologische Zeitschrift. 2010;19(1):91-99.

67

!"#$%F&! !!'(()*%(+!*+!'(+,-./!CFD!! !" #$%&# '(# #) %*+,-./+ 3.3.

0.*(&1..,..*(' 0 !2(3 &($/ 0.&43&*# !" k ! ! ,5(.&*+(34' 5(3.&)! 0.3.'53# , #!$4$ 0.61(3#'$#1.

" # ! k# C!" 1C! C$ Authors

0.42 1.3 1.0 2.0 1.55 0.09 Jones and Launder (1972) 0.42 1.3 1.0 1.92 1.44 0.09 Launder et al. (1972) 0.42 1.3 1.0 1.92 1.176 0.0333 Crespo et al. (1985) 0.42 3.22 1.0 1.92 1.44 0.013 Richards and Hoxey (1993) 0.40 1.11 1.0 1.92 1.44 0.09 Apsley and Castro (1997)

0.40 1.3 1.0 1.92 1.21 0.03 Bechmann and Sørensen (2009)

!"#$ F-1 -"%&' (&#) *++,++-&. *+($'(- k ! ! ./&0'!Sumner et al. 2010!1!!

#,(&%'! 2/ , #+.,7$ #*"# .',5)inflow (/ 0.&26(3#" .5('(("3) 13( -)15 ( -(6$ 5(/.*(3#

#/1##) 8&*3.3( #&8$# %*, 9(5$ #3.&)# 5(6#,5#$ 5(./$! (3&6 9&(' 0/ .&(".3 &()' $.$+ /($8 +(*+% .Richard and Younis 297! (3&6 0..(6" #*" .',5" (,/4 .Richards and Hoxey 3

(6.1# !2(3$ "(3." &($/ 0.3.'53# #*"# .',5 5' k ! ! . (!'# #*"# .',5 5' 0"..! :5., ($ :*('# 5(,7(5$CFD 5(.&%+3 #61(#/ " .Hargreaves and Wright 4 . 5"&" $! 0."! ". 5') 0/

0(&6! #!(7. &.8# 2.! #,.2/ 8.*+3 #,.'" 5.$(".% 5(.&3(, 5('.6"! !" 0.4,'.2&6 5&(1$#3.&)# :((.7$ #.1,!($&(4# ,(-Sumner and Mason 5 0.6.135(,(&5* &*+35') #./$! .

(/.1# #,(&%'!Yang et al. 6 !2(3 &($/ 5+,7,# #3.&)! #!%5# .',5 k ! ! , 5' 0.&'53#&5(. 8.(23 :*('$ !($6# 5$7"$ #.1,!($&(4# ..35.&6(!# &('.5$ "35"3 "2%# .',5# , -(&1$

#$(6$ #..!/# 0/ 9/(2( 9!(## !.*(&*7 5.4,.8# #.6&,'# !" &('.5 .9"3#$ :8.5 Gorlé 7 &+(% !1' /.*(#" 5(.$8/Yang . !" !2(3 '.# #!%5## .',5 !" #'1(5#C$( -# ! !" #.18,(* 0#"

8%&3#&.8#3 , #./$ &(1.! !(7." #3"(3."$ $$7&(3 &()' &($/ #!' #*" .',5.

!"#$NS RA !"#$ !#$ LES-Large eddy simulations

$ 5("35"3 0.$7&(3 0.&()' &($/ #3.&)# 5(.1!(3.+ $(&-RANS , #.."/5$ #) 0' :.$)CENER CFD-Wind, Meteodyn, Windsim 8–10'36(2! (5./23# 5(&*+$ (' . 5..6(!(&('43! +%..5#$

$7&(3 &()'$ #2(8, !7$ #,.3)# #.6&,'# $(".%( %(&# 5..6&,' ,# 5('(("3-RANS :(&5* 5(,5(, 8*+3 5(.4,!($&(4# .!2(3 :.$ 0.!(26 0.!2$# :.'( 0.,("#.# !2(3 -k ! !$ # 5+&6-RNG &'53

5' .$4.3 :*('$ 5&)(%# #3.&)# $ ;!3(3 '(#( 8(5., .&()' .&(%'3$13#)7 . +%..5#$.().%! 5(6!*5# #.1,!($&(4# ,5(,("# #&.6+# 5(4." :.$ 0.!(26 0.!2$# :,". . 5,.$&(4 .$#! !/ 0.13'3#" :((.73

#.1,!($&(4#3 5($& 0./*"(3 %(&# ,$(4 !2(3 !$8! .27 &($/ #/+# 5'(("3 5*+(#$ 9&(1 ". ' 'u w.

.!2(3 !" 0./(1.$# 5' (&*." !./! (,.(1" 5(2($/#" 5(&3!RANS:,". 5(.2(+. 5(!$63 ! :(&5*#) .RANS (,.' $4.# +*(5#3.&)$ 0..2.35 '! 0.48*' , 0..&()%3 #&)%( 5(85,5# (37)intermittent separation( , 5(!($&/3 5&.1.)eddies (, 5..)%(08(5.. !2(3 :7 (37RANS(,.'

-.&% /(*." 0/ 0.&()'$ #.1,!($&(4# !.*(&* 5' 5()%! %.!13 .-+(,$ , :..13" .*7Wilcox 11 , 5%,#Boussinesq 5&"(8 5(.*(&4().' #$.573( 5/1(33# #3.&)# 5(&.#3 :.$! +2!(,..& .13'3 :.$ , .,"

0.$& 0.&83$ 0.821(3 0,.'" 0.',5. .," &2+3 !(2.3# 5(4." )k ! ! (,' 5(&"*'3- #.*(&4().' #.1,!($&(4$( 0.13'3 5/+#)stress transport(,!$' / 5!2(33 #.1*.+.2# 5'(("3 "# . 5%,Boussinesq#'.6" 5&1(.( .

!/ &8%3# 97" :((.73$ "(3." -Large eddy simulations (LES) 0.$7&(3 0.&()' !/3 #3.&)! ( 9!(#!2612,13 .LES! 5.6(!,' #,.# -DNS) direct numerical simulation ( +2!(,..& .&*+3$

68

!"#$%& ,'"(" )*$+% ,',*- ,".-/$%'$.# #"&'-+#0 /$1& 2/3( )$$"40 . ,('#0 ).2 #1"0 #-2/ !"/1$0%$("3# ,")models sub grid (5-/$%'$.# %$("3/ !"(0(0 ).2 #1"0 #-2% #" )-60#0)filter( , +$#(

,"%$("3# ,('% "0$20 +, 7'$+ //4 7'1% . ,".-/$%'$.# ,$&"05# ,("& $8# #/+26%)eddy viscosity (',$" ,$2"$10 )# ,$"*$'.$8"+# ,3-#$ . #'"&6#0 ,$9%$-# ,$%' ,$"9%( ,$'0/

,$+$$(0 /( ,".-/$%'$.#RANS# ,("&% ,$0""2 )-"+ -LES , ,."( /( ,"%$("3# ,$/9#LES #%'#% #/$1& .Wood 14% ($0"(# ,+ '26 -LES9 9"&#$ %4'$0 '$8+ /90 #0"'8# ,4'9# '$%

% ($0"(( #-260/ -LES %4'$0 '$8+ '$%9 ),","0+ 6$*63 ,$&/*,# !9 , ,"%$("3 ,('% ($0"(!"0"+,0 9$5"0 "-08$ #-"19 2"*60( "14% ,$"'+-"/ +/# ,$"52+'.-"+# ,+ 6$*,/ /4% #0"'8

,$/+26# ,#"/$,"3% )""19 ,+50- . /$1"0 $+ !""''# !"'$8+ '$%9 $/+ !"/1$0% ($0"( (" ,+8 !9","0+ ".-/$%'$.15–17 , :+$!"2 (0,(0$ !""''# !"'$8+/ 19$"0# )+*"% #-$'3+/ 3,$*( "'360 1$2

% -LES 18.

!"#$% &'(')*F:

1. Sumner J, Sibuet Watters C, Masson C. CFD in Wind Energy: The Virtual, Multiscale Wind Tunnel. Energies. 2010;3(5):989-1013.

2. Richards PJ, Younis BA. Comments on “Prediction of the Wind-Generated Pressure Distribution Around Buildings by E.H. Mathews.” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1990;34(1):107-110.

3. Richards P, Hoxey R. Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models using the k-; turbulence model. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1993;46-47:145-153.

4. Hargreaves DM, Wright NG. On the use of the k-; Model in Commercial CFD Software to Model the Neutral Atmospheric Boundary Layer. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2007;95(5):355-369.

5. Sumner J, Mason C. k-; Simulations of the Neutral ABL: Achieving Horizontal Homogeneity on Practical Grids. In: Proceedings of 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Orlando, FL, US: AIAA; 2010. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/6dfu6wl.

6. Yang Y, Gu M, Chen S, Jin X. New Inflow Boundary Conditions for Modelling the Neutral Equilibrium Atmospheric Boundary Layer in Computational Wind Engineering. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2009;97(2):88-95.

7. Gorla C, van Beeck J, Rambaud P, Van Tendeloo G. CFD Modelling of Small Particle Dispersion: The Influence of the Turbulence Kinetic Energy in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer. Atmospheric Environment. 2009;43(3):673-681.

8. Meteodyn. METEODYN: Meteorology and Dynamics. Commecial Wind-CFD software site. Available at: http://www.meteodyn.com/en/software/meteodyn-wt.html. Accessed August 14, 2011.

9. CENER. CFDWind 2.0. Commecial Wind-CFD software site. 2010. Available at: http://secure.cener.com/documentos/F_CFD_Wind.pdf.

69

10. Buckley R. WindSim | Maximize production. Minimize loads. 2009. Available at: http://www.windsim.com/documentation/WindSim_Brochure.pdf.

11. Wilcox DC. Turbulence Modeling for CFD. 2nd ed. D C W Industries; 1998.

12. Pope SB. Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press; 2000.

13. Sagaut P. Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows: an Introduction. Springer Verlag; 2006.

14. Wood N. Wind Flow Over Complex Terrain: a Historical Perspective and the Prospect for Large-Eddy Modelling. Boundary-Layer Meteorology. 2000;96(1):11–32.

15. Bechmann A, Sørensen N. Atmospheric Flow over Terrain using Hybrid RANS/LES. In: Ewec 2007. Milan; 2007. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/6l8nwb2.

16. Brasseur J. Space-Time Loadings on Wind-Turbine Blades driven by Atmospheric Boundary Layer Turbulence. 2011. Available at: http://www.wind.psu.edu/research/Brasseur-wind_energy_projects-for_website-5Mar11.pdf.

17. Churchfield M, Vijayakumar G, Brasseur JG. Wind Energy-Related Atmospheric Boundary Layer Large-Eddy Simulation Using OpenFOAM. In: 19th Symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulence. Observations and Modeling Related to Renewable Energy Applications I. Keystone, Colorado, USA; 2010. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/6bka699. Accessed June 23, 2011.

18. Uchida T, Ohya Y. Micro-siting Technique for Wind Turbine Generators by Using Large-Eddy Simulation. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2008;96(10-11):2121-2138.