30
Onalaska High School Response to Intervention delivered thru Professional Learning Communities

Response to Intervention (RtI): Onalaska, Wis., High School

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Onalaska High School

Response to Intervention delivered thru Professional Learning Communities

Timeline

1997-07

– School Improvement?

– School Goals

2007-08

– Coordinated School Improvement

– REACh

– School Goals

2008-09

– REACh

– PLC’s

Mission, Vision, Values, and Goals

2009-10

– Outcomes, Assessment, Accountability, Sustainability

– REACh

– PLC’s

2010-11

– PLC’s

– Sustainability

– No REACh

Transitioning our Culture

Mission – Learning for ALL

Vision – We do whatever it takes

Values: Commitments – Developing and Maintaining PLCs to ensure learning for all

– Focus on Learning

– Utilize Best Practice

– Learning by Doing

– Strive for Continuous Improvement

Caution – This is a journey, not a finished product.

Professional Learning Communities

Four Big Questions

1) What do you expect students to learn?

2) How will you know when they learn it?

3) What will do you do for students that don’t learn it?

4) What will you do with the students that have already learned it?

PLC’s continued Curriculum and Communication

– Scope and Sequence – Changes in Math, Social Studies and English

– Common Pacing and Assessments

Culture of Change – Students and faculty

– Mission, vision, values and goals

– Emphasis on learning instead of teaching

Administrative Review– Learning

– Data

– Tight versus loose leadership

EXAMPLE of REVIEW

Tier One

School Improvement Team – focus change

Report Card versus Deficiency Report

Schedule Changes

– Reduced Passing Time – Freddy 14

– 0 and 9th hour

– Testing Center

– Modified Block

Resource Time

Tier One – Continued

Privilege System

Closed campus for freshmen

Technology Differentiation

STAR Conferences – 8th / 11th grades

Breakfast Program

Collaboration looks like…

A group of people working interdependently to achieve a common goal for which they are mutually accountable.

Collaboration Schedule

EXAMPLE of Collaboration Schedule

– 2010-11 School Year

– Includes collaboration dates for:

Tier One (whole staff)

Tier Two (core teams)

Tier Three (integrated teams)

Department Chair Meetings

School Improvement Committee

Collaboration Plans

Initially developed by School Improvement Team and Administration in 2008-09

By November of 2009 Departments asked for autonomy to focus on areas of need

Submitted each month prior to collaboration time

Initial Collaboration

Examples of building provided agenda– Initially needed to work through:

Norms SMART Goals High functioning teams Group expectations

2nd Agenda – Focus on Formative Assessments– Realization of different starting points

“We can’t use common formative assessments if we aren’t using common learning outcomes.”

– EXAMPLE

Improved Collaboration

Paradigm shift from department head to collaboration leader

“Herd instinct” – some feel need to keep entire department together instead of breaking into teams

Administrative Role

EXAMPLES

Example of Science

– 10 minutes for Physical Science

– 10 minutes for Biology

Challenge of departments teaching singletons

- International Language Department

- Different Languages, different levels but similar instructional strategies

- Leads to discussion regarding best practices and assessment

- Business Department

- CPA Core Standards

- Cross-walk class activities to 21st Century Learning Standards

Professional Development

Shift from speakers to team work time

Tier 1, 2, and 3 activities

EXAMPLES

– Transition Point – February 19, 2009

– Transition Point – October 27, 2010

October 27, 2010

OHS Tier 2 Interventions

Intervention Manual

Content Study Halls

Reading Class– Started as a freshmen course, expanded to sophomore

section and junior/senior section

Double up academic hours

Team Teaching – Resource and Regular Ed Teaching Teams

Testing Center

Transitional Summer School Classes

Schedule – Allow for lateral shifts

OHS Tier Three Interventions

Intervention Conferences Targeted Literacy – Reading Class Odyssey Peer Tutoring CARE Conferences OASIS

– Alternative School

Summer Credit Recovery

Team Approach to Problem Solving

(TAPS)

Meets every Thursday for one hour

School Counselors, Associate Principal, School Nurses, School Resource Officer, School Psychologist, At-Risk Teacher

Formerly spent too much time “admiring the problem”

Two lists generated prior to meeting

1) Five minute List – Five minutes or less to ID intervention

2) More than five minutes list – More than five minutes to ID Intervention

Expectation of Action

Intervention Conference Outline

Traditionally used a CARE conference

– Problems with

Flow chart of expected steps

– EXAMPLE

Intervention Conference

- Organized and led by guidance counselor

- Invite teachers, associate principal, and sometimes school psychologist

- 15-20 minutes in length

- Share student’s strengths and weaknesses

- Follow up provided to each teacher

- EXAMPLE

Privilege List

Developed by SIC team

Focus on keeping the student in the classroom– Example of student in library

Focus on the student earning (back) privileges and motivation to monitor progress

EXAMPLE

Structured Study Halls

EXAMPLE of Structured Study Hall Guidelines

CELEBRATION of new lists

Step approach between 340 hour, commons, and study hall

Assessment Plans

Focus on Learning rather than teaching

Future emphasis on being “tight” with assessments, “loose” with teaching strategies– Underutilized during the first year

EXAMPLE

Example of AA

Change to team-based assessment plans

Odyssey

Targeted Math Intervention

– ID of Freshmen and Sophomores 2 Grade Levels Below

– Sale of program to students

Challenge of using study hall time

– Development of Privileges to increase student ownership

– This year differentiation in targeted classes with technology

Other Interventions

Freddy 14 and Passing Time

Credit Recovery and OASIS

Required Resource on ELD’s

Professional Development Opportunities

Restructuring of Resource Department

LINK Class

What needs improving

Communication among grade-level teachers

PLC Sustainability

Consistency in grading policies

Improve Assessment Practices

Develop essential learning outcomes for junior and senior level courses

THANK YOU

Peter Woerpel – High School Principal

– 608-783-4561, extension 5007

[email protected]

Jared Schaffner-Associate HS Principal

– 608-783-4561, extension 5003

[email protected]