Upload
clustertweed
View
314
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
E v e n t M a i n t e n a n c e d e s t e c h n o l o g i e s r e n o u v e l a b l e s - 2 2 / 0 3 / 1 6
Cluster TechnologyofWalloniaEnergy,EnvironmentandsustainableDevelopment
1
From Seed capital to Export Funding
Guarantees
14Avril2016ASSEMBLEEGENERALETWEED
AGTWEED2016– Conférence&networkingevent« From Seed capitaltoExportFunding Guarantees »
€
t
Using Private/Public Funding for Maturing
Energy Projects
J. De Maeyer 14/04/2016
1 UGent Confidential and proprietary – Jeroen De Maeyer
Business Development at Ghent University
2 UGent Confidential and proprietary – Jeroen De Maeyer
SET – Sustainable Energy Technologies
“To turn excellent technological research results into industrially relevant, innovative solutions for energy challenges
contributing to the creation of a sustainable society”
3 UGent Confidential and proprietary – Jeroen De Maeyer
SET clusters the activities from 5 locations
4
Two cases
5 UGent Confidential and proprietary – Jeroen De Maeyer
Unlocking the potential of metal foam Supporting the Blue Growth sector
An “unusual” spin-off?
6 UGent Confidential and proprietary – Jeroen De Maeyer
www.alhedron.com
Temporary Industry to University Transfer Open innovation
It all started with
Two partners, two worlds ¾ A company producing metal foam (targeting spin-out) ¾ A research group with expertise in thermal modeling
A funded project ¾ Baekeland mandate: employee of the company can obtain a PhD
(mixed public/private funding) ¾ Understanding metal foam used in heat exchangers
A contractual agreement ¾ Most results for the company; with “billijke return”! ¾ General methods for Ghent University
7 UGent Copyright – Jeroen De Maeyer
A change of plans UGent taking the lead
Mid 2011 ¾ Company decides to stop investing in metal foam, ¾ Employee is allowed to finish PhD
Mid 2012 ¾ PhD is starting to deliver very good results and insights
Research group is interested in setting up a spin-off ¾ Team is assembled ¾ Incubation funding is raised
– Industrial research fund – IWT
8 UGent Copyright – Jeroen De Maeyer
Industry to University Transfer (IUT) Industry to University Transfer (mid 2012) ¾ Aim: To bundle all relevant knowledge + FTO ¾ Transfer: 4 patent (applications) + results from the IWT project ¾ Deal: UGent will bear all future costs ¾ Goal: Traditional UIT Æ spin-off: Alhedron (°2016) ¾ Deal: No upfront fee, but company will benefit from success
Industry to University “Transfer” ¾ People, Materials, Money: common ¾ IP/Know-how: not so common
– IUT Enablers? (distressed projects, 1+1=3, gap funding) – IUT Pitfalls? (timing, only for non-core IP) – IUT potential financial deals? (no cure, no pay)
9 UGent Copyright – Jeroen De Maeyer
2,5 years later - open Innovation
10 UGent Confidential and proprietary – Jeroen De Maeyer
Mid 2014 ¾ Identification of market pain, application, potential customer ¾ Question how to interact with this customer?
– Traditional “university way” – Or collaboration in line with system of “closed pockets”
¾ Closed Pockets = mixed public/private funding – Work to be done by company – Work to be done by university – No financial transactions – Background remains background – Results: co-owned – Preferential partners in the domain – Philosophy: in and outside the domain: non-obstructive
What’s next?
11 UGent Confidential and proprietary – Jeroen De Maeyer
Q32016 ¾ Incorporation of spin-off is planned ¾ Funding via
– Venture Capital – Bank loans – Upfront payments customer – Own contributions –
Two cases
12 UGent Confidential and proprietary – Jeroen De Maeyer
Unlocking the potential of metal foam Supporting the Blue Growth sector
duurzame voedingsbodem voor succesvol technologisch ondernemen
Science Park (20 ha)
Incubator
offices business support seminars
knowledge
Blue Growth
Energy efficiency
Research institutes
community
Research Institutes
Government Companies
Triple Helix
Blue Growth according to the EU
BLUE GROWTH: UNLOCKING THE POTENTIAL
OF SEAS AND OCEANS Seas and oceans are drivers for the European economy
and have great potential for innovation and growth. It [Blue Growth] is the maritime contribution to achieving the goals of the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
The 'blue' economy ¾ +/- 5.4 million jobs ¾ +/- €500 billion gross added value a year
18 UGent Confidential and proprietary – Jeroen De Maeyer
Blue growth according to the EU
1. Develop sectors with high potential for sustainable jobs and growth
¾ aquaculture (Fisheries website) ¾ coastal tourism (link to coastal defence) ¾ marine biotechnology ¾ ocean energy ¾ seabed mining
2. Essential components to provide knowledge, legal certainty and security in the blue economy
3. Sea basin strategies to ensure tailor-made measures and to foster cooperation between countries
¾ O.a. North Sea
19 UGent Confidential and proprietary – Jeroen De Maeyer
Ocean energy?
Wave energy
Tidal energy Ocean thermal energy conversion Osmotic energy (salinity gradient)
20 UGent Confidential and proprietary – Jeroen De Maeyer
Ocean Energy: it is happening
21 UGent Confidential and proprietary – Jeroen De Maeyer
dd.11/04/2016
Context Gen4Wave – Why?
22 UGent Confidential and proprietary – Jeroen De Maeyer
“Gen4Wave believes that the Flemish industry should & can play
an important role in the supply chain of wave- and tidal energy.
Gen4Wave wishes support this and in the mean-time support the offshore and coastal engineering sector. “
Gen4Wave – How?
“Gen4Wave believes that the Flemish industry should & can play
an important role in the supply chain of wave- and tidal energy.
Gen4Wave wishes support this and in the mean-time support the offshore and coastal engineering sector. “
Three pillars 1. Open Test&R&D infrastructure
(Wave Tank, COB) 2. Open Gen4Wave Energy Platform 3. Closed R&D projects
23 UGent Confidential and proprietary – Jeroen De Maeyer
UGent Confidential and proprietary – Jeroen De Maeyer
Funding
CAPEX Infrastructure is (planned to be) funded by ¾ Hercules ¾ IWT ¾ UGent, KULv, Flanders Hydraulics
OPEX ¾ Market conform conditions w.r.t. access for the companies ¾ Reduced fee for academic ¾ Supported access by H2020 (e.g. Marinet or HydraLab)
25 UGent Confidential and proprietary – Jeroen De Maeyer
Cluster funding?
Cluster activities Æ extend to wind ¾ Until now: own funding ¾ Targetted funding via EFRO,
INTERREG and “cluster policy” of Flemish Government (50% co-funding)
26 UGent Confidential and proprietary – Jeroen De Maeyer
Bron: regional cluster atlas Baden-Württemberg 2015
Commercial
27 UGent Confidential and proprietary – Jeroen De Maeyer
Blue energy to blue growth
Wave tank “Sheltered” sea conditions ¾ EFRO, INTERREG
Commercial offshore wind park
28 UGent Confidential and proprietary – Jeroen De Maeyer
Spuikom
Gen4Wave
Commercieel
Vooroever
Project Aqua Value (Agentschap Ondernemen)
29 UGent Confidential and proprietary – Jeroen De Maeyer
Conclusions
30 UGent Confidential and proprietary – Jeroen De Maeyer
Creativity related to funding allows to mature projects ¾ Focussed on one specific product/service ¾ Bringing added value for the industrial sector
Different funding channels are available ¾ Internal academic funds ¾ Private funding ¾ Public funding
– Regional level – European level
Gen4Wave Contact
Jeroen De Maeyer UGent-IOF-SET consortium Technologiepark Zwijnaarde 913 9052 Zwijnaarde 09/264 79 14 [email protected] www.set.ugent.be www.gen4wave.ugent.be www.energy.ugent.be
Agoria 2016 1
Seed & Venture Capital
Dr. Jos B. Peeters
Partners-owned Experienced dedicated investment teams
AIFMD licensed asset manager > € 380 million under management > € 180 million in venture capital
Head office - Leuven, Belgium
Quest Cleantech Fund
€ 52 million* * December 31, 2015
Quest for Growth € 148 million*
* December 31, 2015
CLEANTECH € 112 million
HEALTHTECH € 42 million
ICT € 33 million
CAPRICORN VENTURE PARTNERS
Agoria 2016 2
Our strengths
• Track record • Focused, experienced investment teams • Relevant deals done to date and deal flow • Our reputation in the sectors we invest in and our experience in working
with industrial partners
• Tradition of pro-active portfolio management • Lead or co-lead all investments • Active board representation and strategic involvement • Supporting future rounds of financing
• International experience and orientation • Have invested across Europe and in US • Significant business exposure to South-East Asia
• Credible, established organisation • Multiple, specialised funds with common back office • AFIMD license, supervised by FSMA
Agoria 2016 3
Alternative assets
4
Private Equity
Real Estate Hedge Funds
MBO/I
LBO
Buy-out
Venture Capital Seed
Early-Stage Start-up
Spin-off / Spin-out
Expansion
Agoria 2016
A history of building companies
Agoria 2016 5
The VC Business
• Definition : • Invests at its own risk • Seeks medium term capital gains • Works in partnership with the entrepreneur
• Seeks exceptional opportunities and individuals • Reasonable probability to make 5 to 10 times multiple • CCF made 16 investments in 9 countries out of 2,600
proposals over the past 7 years
Agoria 2016 6
Tech VC’s prefer to invest in
• Entrepreneurs and a team • Technology as sustainable competitive
advantage • strong and clean intellectual property/capital • proof of concepts exists and mode of action
is understood
• A business model we understand and like • Growing and huge markets • ‘Need to have’ proposals with ‘identified
customer problem’ • Focus combined with mutant potential • Well funded and capital efficient companies • Exit perspective @ 5 to 10 x multiple
7 Agoria 2016
Capr
icor
n Ve
ntur
e Pa
rtne
rs 1. Invest to exploit Business Opportunities,
not to develop Technology or Science.
Agoria 2016
EpiGaN’s target markets
Agoria 2016 10
GaN devices
Automotive
Voltage regulator ICs / Drivers discrete transistor & diode
PV Inverter
Power switching
PFC / power supplies DC/AC
inverter DC/DC
converter
EV/HEV & EV/(P)HEV
Inverter
UPS Motor control
Space & defence
CATV
MEMS devices and sensors
IT & Consumer Automotive Telecoms
Datacentres
Power management RF
Sensors
Discrete power transistor & diode / power modules / IPM
30V 1.2kV
Industrial
GaN epiwafer
Agoria 2016 11
Most of the device characteristics are defined by the material: Breakdown Voltage, Current level, Threshold Voltage, Operating Frequency, Uniformity, Yield…
Value is in the EPIWAFER !
Production area and Wafer Qualification line
> Dedicated production clean-room, class 10,000
> MOCVD multi-wafer reactors (AIXTRON) > Wafer Qualification line, class 1,000 > HRXRD batch tool – Photoluminescence-
Electrical characterisation – surface analysis…
> Size: 320m2+160m2 (support area)
Agoria 2016 12
EpiGaN strategy extention: move in value chain
System Capture higher value by making projects
with application customers
Devices /Sub circuits Create more market traction by making
DEVICE demo
Epiwafers Build up on our core strength and uniqueness
FOCUS ON GENERATING REVENUE
Agoria 2016 13
Capr
icor
n Ve
ntur
e Pa
rtne
rs
5. Time your investments to survive the chasms in the technology adoption life cycle and don’t count on your friends to bail you out.
Technology Adoption Life Cycle
Source : Crossing the Chasm, Geoffrey A. Moore Agoria 2016 15
Revised Technology Adoption Life Cycle
Source : Crossing the Chasm, Geoffrey A. Moore Agoria 2016 16
CONTACT DETAILS
Agoria 2016 17
Dr. Jos B. Peeters: [email protected]
CAPRICORN VENTURE PARTNERS Lei 19/1, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
Tel +32 16 28 41 00
www.capricorn.be
Renewable Energy Club
Bert Derudder Namur 14/04/16
Bank financing in Renewables
2
� Define bank debt?
� Observation based on ad randum portfolio
Belgium Corporate(non project finance)
Belgium ProjectFinance
91%of total renewablesexposure in corporate portfolio = project finance
Intro: Bank debt in renewables
3
Overview
� Intro: Project finance vs corporate bank debt� Bank debt in renewables: KBC� Project finance basics� Why you should prefer corporate bank debt� Alternative investors in project finance?� Take-aways
4
Bank Debt in Renewables: KBC?
5
Bank Debt in Renewables: KBC(bis)?
6
Recent deals in Energy
Dec 2014
Storm Genk Storm Dilsen-Stokkem
On shore wind
Oct 2010
Solar FinanceSolar
Nov 2010
C-PowerOffshore wind
Phase 1, 2 and 3
Dec 2008
A&S EnergieBiomass
Apr 2008
Biostoom OostendeWaste-to-energy
Jul 2012
Grensland PowerOn shore wind
Aug 2014
Storm MeerOn shore wind
Jun 2014
Wind aan de Stroom On shore wind
Jun 2012
On shore windWindvision Floreffe
Mar 2015
Storm DesselgemOn shore wind
Nov 2012
Windvision Leuze-en-Hainaut
Dec 2008
T-PowerGas-fired power station
7
Dec 2015
Wind4Flanders (on shorewind)
€ 30 million
Mandated lead arranger And debt financier (club deal)
Jan 2016
On shore wind€ 16 million
Sole mandated lead arranger and debt financier
More recent deals in Energy
8
Tijd 3 juli ‘15
� Positieve view on renewable energy (CSR)
� More than enough room under the renewable energy ‘cap’
� New Legislation in Wallonia, Flanders and Belgium (federal) should be more sustainable
KBC strategy is supportive for Renewables
9
36%
28%
11%
12%
13% 0%
KBC portfolio project finance energy
Wind (OnShore)
Wind (OffShore)
Solar
Conventional
Biomass
Biogass
Wind is stronghold
10
� Project Finance dominates portfolio
Belgium Corporate(non project finance)
Belgium ProjectFinance
91%of total renewablesexposure in corporate portfolio = project finance
Renewables portfolio
11
Overview
� Intro: Project finance vs corporate bank debt� Bank debt in renewables: KBC� Project finance basics� Why you should prefer corporate bank debt� Alternative investors in project finance?� Take-aways
12
Project Finance basics
Project Finance: what?1. Debt financing is granted to the project only (SPV; Special Purpose
Vehicle)2. Without any recourse on the shareholders3. “Cash flow based lending” 4. Significant impact on structure
Heavy/costly contractsDue DiligencesFinancing structure
Observation1. Often long tenors2. Often high gearing
13
C
SPV
Shareholder Bank(s)
Constrution andMaintenance Contract
Power PurchaseContracts & Green
Certificate contracts
Construction Phase $ (1.bis)
$ (1)
$ (2)
OperationalPhase
$ (2)$ (3)
$ (1) $ (1 bis)
Project Finance basics (bis)
14
• Non-recourse character (long tenors and high gearing) requires clear structuring elements:
• Ring fenced financing structure with financial buffers (eg blocked reserve accounts)
• Steady cash flows secured via strong (expensive) LT contracts
• External Due Diligences
• Risks allocated to parties outside SPV
• Construction Riskeg Turbine contract
• Technology Riskeg Availability guarantees in O&M contract of turbineseg Availability guarantees in O&M contract of biomass plant
• Market RiskEg LT Power Purchase Agreement Eg LT feedstock contract
Project Finance basics (tris)
15
Overview
� Intro: Project finance vs corporate bank debt� Bank debt in renewables: KBC� Project finance basics� Why you should prefer corporate bank debt� Alternative investors in project finance?� Take-aways
16
Project finance vs corporate bank debt
There is a trade-off between corporate bank debt financing and project finance
• Project finance allows longer tenors and higher leverage (and deconsolidation) …
• … but comes at a price wrt flexibility and cost (IRR of het project):• Structuring costs (due diligences, security pack, extensive credit contracts)• Project contracts have to be LT, all inclusive and include extensive liabilities • Financial buffers including blocked accounts
17
Project finance vs corporate bank debt
• Is there always a choice?• Risk allocation outside SPV possible? (>> Corporate financiering) (cfr next slide)• Big projects / small sized developer (>> Project finance)• Higher gearing/ longer tenor as motive (>> Project finance)• Deconsolidation as motive (>> Project finance)• IRR/Cost as a motive (>> Corporate financiering)
• Hybrid structures (best of two worlds)• Cost overrun/recourse during construction• Cash deficiency for certain events• …
• (Remark: Project finance is possible via bank debt and via leasing)
18
Biogas
Biomass
Solar
Wind
PPA/GSC offtake
Belgian Subsidy Schemes!
Belgian Subsidy Schemes !
Feedstock
Fragmented markests
Yield Study
Technology Risk
No all in maintenance contracts
All in maintenance contracts?
Strength contractors?
All in maintenance contracts
Structuring Costs vs Size
High structuring and due diligence costs vs small projects
Small projects
Standardization (on shore) or economies of scale (off shore)
Are all technologies fit for PF?
�18
Market risk
19
� Not KBC policy
� Demand Driven
Belgium Corporate(non project finance)
Belgium ProjectFinance
91%of total renewablesexposure in corporate portfolio = project finance
Project Finance dominates Renewables portfolio
20
Overview
� Intro: Project finance vs corporate bank debt� Bank debt in renewables: KBC� Project finance basics� Why you should prefer corporate bank debt� Alternative investors in project finance?� Take-aways
21
FactsProject Finance Market
1992 – 1997 1998 - 2002 2003 - 2008 2009 2010 -2012 Today
�21
The earlyyears
•All bank debt•Up to 20 yearstenor
A growing project finance market
•Majority bank debt•Up to 30 years tenor for infrastructureprojects
The competitiveproject finance years
•Bank debt readily available•For larger internationalprojects: competitionbetween bank and(monoline-wrapped) bonds•Up to 30 years tenor forinfrastructure projects
The Crisis
•Sharp Increase in Margins•No Long-Term Debtavailable•For larger internationalprojects: monolines andproject bonds disappeared
Post-crisis
•Bank debt credit margins stabilized –however, continuing shift towards shorter tenors and limited availability of bank debt• Basel III•Emergence of alternative lenders
Today
• Liquidity (!)• Pricing has (temporarily pushed out some institutional lenders)• Soft/Hard Landing
22
Project Finance (renables and Infrastructure): attractive asset class
• An attractive asset class for alternative investors: Pension Funds, Insurance companies, …� Characteristics: Stable cash flows, asset and liability match (longer tenors),
diversifier (low correlation with bonds/equity), potential inflation link� Risk: Acceptable probabilities of default, high recovery rates, low volatility of risk
profile,… � Return: Attractive yield pickup relative to government debt
�22
23
Renewables still a bank’s thing (for the moment)
Limited institutional senior debt in renewables project finance (for the moment), due to:� Pricing (liquidity) � Risk profile of renewables
�23
24
Take aways
� Intro: Project finance vs corporate bank debt� Bank debt in renewables: KBC� Project finance basics� Why you should prefer corporate bank debt� Alternative investors in project finance?� Take-aways
> Substantial part of KBC renewables financed by project finance debt> Trade-off between project finance and corporate finance> Project Finance still dominated by bank debt
25
Questions?
Namur – Cluster TWEED - 14/4/2016
REScoop approaches for financing the energy transition
La fédération REScoop EU asbl
• REScoop: Renewable Energy Sources Cooperative • Pas moins de 2 397 REScoops européennes, implantées
principalement en Europe de l’Ouest • Très peu de REScoops en Europe Centrale et en Europe de l’Est
(pas assez de support pour le renouvelable, et de plus le mot “coopérative” y reste facilement associé au communisme)
• Pays où les REScoops ont le plus de succès jusqu’à présent: Allemagne, Danemark, Autriche
• REScoop.eu représente aujourd’hui 1 240 initiatives et 300 000 citoyens actifs dans la transition énergétique, 2 milliards d’euros investis dans des installations de production d’énergie renouvelable pour une capacité de production de 1 GW.
La fédération REScoop EU asbl
Les fédérations REScoop Wallonie asbl et REScoop Vlaanderen vzw
5
REScoop Wallonie asbl
La fédération wallonne
… dans une fédération belge et dans une fédération européenne
Présentation de la fédération REScoop Wallonie asbl
Depuis 2014 - Fédération wallonne des coopératives citoyennes agréées ou à finalité sociale et des associations citoyennes locales : • qui travaillent au développement des énergies renouvelables dans le
respect des principes du développement durable • qui défendent un rôle central du citoyen dans la transition énergétique • qui appliquent les 7 principes coopératifs de l’Alliance coopérative
internationale ainsi que la Charte REScoop.eu Les membres de REScoop Wallonie asbl ne sont pas seulement agréées par la CNC. En effet, en plus elles appliquent les principes coopératifs de l’Alliance Coopérative Internationale, et toute décision doit se faire dans le respect de ces principes :
• L’autonomie et l’indépendance • L’attention portée à la communauté • L’adhésion volontaire et ouverte • Le contrôle démocratique par les membres • La participation économique des membres • L’éducation, la formation et l’information • La coopération entre les coopératives
Présentation de la fédération REScoop Wallonie asbl
Notre objectif: Fédérer pour renforcer la participation active des citoyens dans l’exploitation et l’utilisation des ressources énergétiques accessibles sur le territoire de la Belgique, dans le respect des principes du développement durable (social / sociétal, économique, environnemental). Nos missions: • Promouvoir la participation citoyenne dans le développement des ER de
manière à assurer un contrôle public et citoyen sur cette production et à permettre un retour économique pour les citoyens et la collectivité
• Sensibiliser les consommateurs aux ER et à l’URE • Promouvoir la coopération entre les membres (coopératives,
coopératives en formation et ACL) : organiser l’échange d’informations et d’expériences ; des formations ; la mise en commun de compétences ; promouvoir une cohérence entre les membres en ce qui concerne les modes de participation.
Présentation de la fédération REScoop Wallonie asbl
12,2 MW installés et 2,9 MW avec permis libre de tout recours = 15 MW Production 2015 : 25 700 MWh = consommation de 7 300 ménages
Les 12 coopératives citoyennes membres effectifs de REScoop.Wallonie rassemblent à ce jour de l’ordre de 5 700 coopérateurs pour 7,8 millions € de capital souscrit, et sont impliquées dans des réalisations ou des projets d’énergie renouvelable (éolien + biométhanisation + hydro, mais majoritairement dans l’éolien à ce jour) à différents stades de développement. Coopératives citoyennes de type REScoopW = fonctionnant conformément au modèle coopératif énergétique citoyen de REScoop Wallonie (le pouvoir décisionnel est un point central : autonomie des citoyens, indépendance du CA qui ne peut pas être soumis au contrôle direct ou indirect du développeur/producteur privé ou public)
www.cociter.be
COCITER – l’énergie que vous produisez !
Les coopératives associées à COCITER sont productrices d’énergie
COCITER fournit l’énergie produite aux coopérateurs
Les citoyens investissent dans les coopératives agréées de production d’énergie renouvelable
,
Les coopératives associées dans COCITER
REScoop MECISE project General objectives
Introducing the “REScoop-municipality approach” in the field of sustainable energy investments:
• local authorities and local REScoops systematically collaborate in developing, financing, realizing and operating projects during their lifetime
• more and more energy efficiency projects become financially feasible by systematically connecting them with renewable energy investments of sufficient scale
Bringing this approach in practice in 6 European Regions and launch > 30 MEUR additional sustainable energy investments
Financing the energy transition REScoop approaches
1. Collaboration between REScoops and local authorities, i.p. municipalities signatories of the Covenant of Mayors, giving access to EU structural funds
2. Make EE investments “bankable” trough connecting them with RES investments in an appropriate scale
3. “Bundling” projects from several REScoops: total investment size suits instruments from EIB or joint EIB/EC initiatives
4. Financial collaboration between REScoops: loans, joint investments, bridging periods with too many or too few projects, get new REScoops started
1) Local authoricity and REScoop collaboration
8 Local authorities often lack the technical and organizational capacity to identify and develop suitable sustainable energy project, raise the financing, realize and operate projects for many years
8 Many municipalities signatory of the Covenant of Mayors find it difficult to realize the measure they have committed themselves to.
8 Local authorities and their citizens organized in REScoops are “natural” partners
8 The type of collaboration (contract, PPP, co-ownership, project company, etc.) depends on the project, the parties preferences, legal aspects, etc.
2) Making EE measures “bankable”
8 Investments in measures for rational use of energy, such as energy retrofit of buildings, efficient public lighting, energy saving measures in general, are difficult to finance as they do not generate positive cash flows
8 Connecting a certain size of EE investments with a certain size of RES investments in one investment programme can bring a solution
8 Stability for 15 to 20 years must be assured
8 Citizens can offer this stability by investing in both local RES and EE projects
8 Citizens are involved, directly through their REScoop, and indirectly through their local authority
3) Bundling projects of several REScoops
8 By bundling investment projects of several REScoops a larger total investment size needed can be reached, in order to become eligible for EIB loans, EEEF and similar financing initiatives
8 A team of financial experts can be composed from staff of several REScoops or financial services can be hired in
8 PDA (Project Development Assistance) tools are available to prepare the preparation of the investment files in the form as needed for the specific financing initiatives
4) Financial collaboration between REScoops
8 Well establish REScoops support new REScoops in the start-up phase
8 Some REScoops might struggle with over-capitalisation when projects can not be realised as planned. At the same time other REScoops might be very successful in developing projects, but do not manage to gather the necessary capital to finance them. REScoops can lend each other the money to bridge these periods
8 Joint development by several REScoops sharing a number projects among each other according to the financial capacity of each REScoop
8 Co-investment by several REScoops in one large scale project: co-ownership with joint exploitation (costs and benefits are divided according the ownership)
ECCO NOVA | RENEWABLE ENERGY CLUB | 2016
ECCO NOVA | RENEWABLE ENERGY CLUB | 2016 2 | 7
NOS CONSTATS
1. PREOCCUPATION ENVIRONMENTALE CROISSANTE VS NIMBY
4. EPARGNE AU PLUS HAUT MAIS INTÉRÊTS AU PLUS BAS
3. RENFORCEMENT DES EXIGENCES DES BANQUES
2. DIMINUTION DES AIDES POUR SOUTENIR LES PORTEURS DE PROJET
5. ENGOUEMENT POUR LE FINANCEMENT PARTICIPATIF
ECCO NOVA | RENEWABLE ENERGY CLUB | 2016 3 | 7
LE CROWDFUNDING
Le crowdfunding décrit toutes les transactions financières qui font appel à un grand nombre de personnes pour financer un projet. Le crowdlending est une variante orientée prêt
En 2014, l’Europe disposait de 200 plateformes de crowdfunding ayant levé près de 3 milliards d’euros et présentant une croissance de plus de 140%
Appliqué à l’énergie, le crowdlending est complémentaire aux coopératives citoyennes et aux banques. 5 millions £ ont été alloués au photovoltaïque en Angleterre suite à l’association de TRILLION FUND et TRIODOS RENEWABLE
ECCO NOVA | RENEWABLE ENERGY CLUB | 2016 4 | 7
LE CROWDFUNDING DANS L’ENERGIE
En 2015, Le crowdfunding appliqué à l’énergie c’est* :
• 24 plateformes dans le monde (17 EU, 7 USA)
• 144 Mio€ récoltés par les 5 leaders (contre 31 Mio€ l’an passé)
• Leadership de l’Allemagne, de l'Angleterre et de la hollande
• TrillionFund – UK - €104,379,968
• Abundance – UK - €15,857,783
• Windcentrale – NL - €15,000,000
• Village Power – US - €4,600,000
• Econeers – DE - €4,100,000
* Source : http://www.recrowdfunding.eu/
ECCO NOVA | RENEWABLE ENERGY CLUB | 2016 5 | 7
LE CROWDFUNDING DANS L’ENERGIE
• France • 5,6Mio€ levés • 100% prêt • Lancée en fin 2014 • Investissement moyen 1.025€
• Allemagne • +4 Mio€ levés • 100% prêt • Lancée en fin 2013
• Royaume Uni • +20 Mio€ levés • Obligations (debenture) • Lancée en 2012
• Fédère les plateformes et les coopératives européennes
• Cofinancé par l’UE • Lancée début 2015 • Objectif : 17 Mio€ => 2017
ECCO NOVA | RENEWABLE ENERGY CLUB | 2016 6 | 7
LE CROWDFUNDING SUR ECCO NOVA
MISSION Faciliter la transition énergétique et le développement durable grâce au crowdfunding
HISTORIQUE Créé en Janvier 2016 par trois entrepreneurs Liégeois issus de l’énergie et de la communication
METHODOLOGIE Sélection technico-financière rigoureuse par ECCO NOVA
Investissements sous forme de prêt subordonné par les internautes
OBJECTIFS 10 projets et 1.000.000 € levés en 2016
Un rendement supérieur à 5%
WWW.ECCONOVA.COM
ECCO NOVA | RENEWABLE ENERGY CLUB | 2016 7 | 7
NOTRE PLATEFORME EN LIGNE
From Seed capital to Export
Funding Guarantee Session 5: Export Funding Guarantee
Nabil Jijakli, Group Deputy CEO Namur – 14 April 2016
International credit insurance Group
¾ Public institution
¾ Belgian State Guarantee / S&P : AA rated
¾ MLT transactions and support to Belgian exporters
¾ Private insurance company
¾ No State Guarantee
¾ ST transactions – insured’s worldwide BEL
GIU
M
Session 5: Export Funding Guarantee, 14 April 2016 2
Country policy
A world of rising short-term risks Credendo’s Political risk map
4 Session 5: Export Funding Guarantee, 14 April 2016
Exemple: la Tunisie cf. www.delcredereducroire.be Analyse du risque pays - Ducroire
Session 5: Export Funding Guarantee, 14 April 2016 5
Delcredere | Ducroire :
- Mission
- Belgian interest
Delcredere | Ducroire - Mission
Session 5: Export Funding Guarantee, 14 April 2016
To support Belgian international economic relations by
covering risks relating to exports, imports and
investments abroad.
7
Delcredere | Ducroire – Belgian interest
Session 5: Export Funding Guarantee, 14 April 2016
Flexible approach towards
Belgian content
Also considering the Belgian interest,
Belgian added value
8
Delcredere | Ducroire
ECA Products
Financial guarantee Facilitate access to credit facilities
Belgian
Exporter Tunisian Buyer
Credit insurance Cover risks taken on the buyer
Forfaiting / Buyer Loan Offer credit to the buyer
Export transaction
Session 5: Export Funding Guarantee, 14 April 2016 10
Bank
Financial guarantee Facilitate access to credit facilities
Investment insurance Cover the political risks
Investment abroad
Session 5: Export Funding Guarantee, 14 April 2016
Belgian
Investor
11
9 Special cash transaction no credit
1) payable per transfer
2) payable per LC with /or without confirmation
9 Buyer credit credit to the buyer / bank 1) Credit facility directly to the buyer
9 Supplier credit credit to the buyer / bank 1) no discounting
2) discounting with /or without recourse
Credit Insurance for Belgian export transactions
Session 5: Export Funding Guarantee, 14 April 2016 12
3 types of transactions
� Forfaiting for small Belgian export transactions
9 Indirect financing credit to the buyer / Delcredere|Ducroire
� New product coming soon : Buyer Loan 9 Direct financing credit to the buyer / Delcredere|Ducroire
Financing solutions by Delcredere | Ducroire
Session 5: Export Funding Guarantee, 14 April 2016 13
for transactions up to EUR 5 M
� Investment Insurance no credit
9 Capital invested abroad
9 insured for political risks only
� Financial Guarantee credit to the exporter / bank 9 Helps to access to bank financing
9 Risk sharing with bank
Delcredere | Ducroire – Other Products
Session 5: Export Funding Guarantee, 14 April 2016 14
Turning uncertainties into opportunities