Upload
guan-lin-huang
View
149
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
IN ABDOMINAL PENETRATING WOUND CONSERVATIVE TX IS ACCEPTABLE
Citation preview
penetrating injury
2014/9/20 Huang Guan-Lin M.D.
Abdominal
20 歲男性 周末狂歡跟旁人對傳播妹爭風吃醋步入急診室,據傳被用長達 10 公分的扁鑽刺入生命徵象 BP:130/85 HR:98 BT:37.6急診醫師嘗試床邊診視傷口 但因為傷口較深而無法得知是否深入腹膜且傷口附近持續在滲血 , no peritoneal sign
How to manage this patient?
Indications for laparotomy
• Hemodynamic unstable• Peritoneal irritation/diffuse abdominal pain >> S/S• Fascia penetration• Gunshot wound with transperitoneal path
Symptoms?
Yes No
Hemodynamicstable
Yes OP OP
no OP ????
• Hemodynamic stable Knife/gunshot Distance Blood loss
• Gun shot injury: 98% peritoneal penetration• Stabbing injury: 30% intraperitoneal injury
What do I do in ER?
• Seems no emergent OP problem/active bleeding now
• On IV, check the CBC, prepare blood• FAST / abdominal CT >internal bleeding/emergent OP indication
• Seems no emergent OP problem/active bleeding now
• On IV, check the CBC, prepare blood• FAST / abdominal CT >internal bleeding/emergent OP indication
• Patient easy, CT report. Intend to let him MBD in AM8:00
• Duty VS consult GS CR…
• My question is …
Other examination?How long in obs room?Is there any evidence support the Tx?Possibility of laparotomy in obs pts?
Symptoms?
Yes No
Hemodynamicstable
Yes OP OP
no OP NOM
NOM= SELECTIVE NON OPERATIVE MANEGEMENT
Q1:In stable stab wd pts, rationale for early laparotomy?
Nancy(1969), New Orleans charity hospitalUnnecessary laparotomy Complication in
Unnecessary laparotomyEarly laparotomy 66% 24%
Clinical judgement 25% 0%
Friedmann(1968):70% negative laparotomy rate in mandatory laparotomy
Lee(1984): 7.8% negative laparotomy rate in selective management initial presentation and examination accuracy: 88%
Morbidity of nontherapeutic laparotomy
• Complications of laparotomy(41.3%) Atelectasis:41.3% Pleural effusion:9.8% Pneumothorax:5.2% Pneumonia:3.9%
Mortality:0.8%
• Hospital stay:Uncomplicated : 5.1daysComplicated: 11.9 days
J Trauma. 1995;38:350-356Am surg 1994;60:744-747
Q2:Gun-shot injury on selective NOM?
• Still in controversy• If NOM was chosen, need other examination
Lowe, 1977, retrospective review of 362 pts with GSW
108 pts Tangential injury, NOM
254 pts Suspect penetrating visceral cavity97.6% need surgical repair
Velmahos, 2001, retrospective 792 pts with NOM GSW
80 pts Delayed laparotomy, therapeutic rate:72%
712 pts NOM
Routine laparotomy
47% false negative
Q3:Local wound exploration feasible?
• Negative fascia penetration: conservative TX
• Positive fascia penetration: mandatory op? Fabian(1993): negative laparotomy rate 50%
• Still further investigation if fascia penetration
Q4:Better adjuncts examination for selective NOM?
• ECHO: not enough data• Angiography: not enough data
• DPL: high sen, spe, accuracy in old times
• CT: Shanmuganathan(2004) Sen:97%, spe:98%, accuracy:98% in penetrating stab wds Velmahos(2005) GSW: Sen 90.5, Spe: 96%
Radiology 2004:231:775-784J trauma 2005:59:1155-1161
Q5How long would be the observation time?
• MBD after 24hrs obs with minimal or no abdominal tenderness
• Alzamel(2005) Retrospective 650pts with NOM and delayed
laparotomy in 12hrs
• Velmehos(1997) stable, tolerate food after 24hrs(1856pts)
TAKE HOME MESSAGE
NOM indicationStab wound: rationale for NOM
Gun shot wound: still in debatesExamination: CTOBS time:24hrs
Huang Guan-Lin M.D.Kaohsiung CGMH urology department
• Stab wound: liver > small bowel > diaphragm >colon• Gunshot wound: small bowel > colon > liver >abdominal
vascular
ATLS textbook
• Easy miss diagnosis Hollow viscus rupture Solid organ bleeding Bony pelvis bleeding
• Significant blood loss may present in No dramatic change in appearance No obvious change in peritoneal sign