25
Full Year 2016 Results February 3, 2017

Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

Full Year 2016 ResultsFebruary 3, 2017

Page 2: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

2.2.2017 2

2016 in Brief

Net sales up 0.9% and EBITDA 0.1%*

Financial occupancy rate at 93.4%

Service income up 10.6%, now 13.0% of total sales, margin more than doubled

Cash flow from operations EUR 0.46 (0.52)per share

ROCE 5.6% (6.1%)

New growth projects on target

Divestitures at fair value continued

Equity ratio up to 41.5% (39.3%) mainly due to rights issue & divestitures

* Net sales up 1.8 % and EBITDA 1.2%on a constant currency basis

Page 3: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

2.2.2017 3

Unit Occupancy

94,9%

89,6%

97,1% 97,2%93,0%

96,5%98,9% 100,0% 100,0%

92,1%

84,7%

95,1% 94,5% 95,2%

91,1%

99,3% 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

Q4-2015 Q4-2016

Group Q4/1693.4%

Page 4: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

2.2.2017 4

Long-Term Group Occupancy

10 year average 94.3%

Q4/1693.4%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

Page 5: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

2.2.2017 5

Customer Satisfaction at Record Level

3,543,6

3,68 3,72

4,13 4,16

3,733,77

3,84 3,84

4,11

4,21

3,2

3,4

3,6

3,8

4

4,2

4,4

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Users Decision makers

Page 6: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

2.2.2017 6

Service Business Growth 10.6%

93,0 111,1 144,8 150,3

149,6

14,2

15,2

16,9 20,3 22,413,2%

12,0%

10,4%

11,9%

13,0%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

0

50

100

150

200

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Rental income Service income Service penetration

EUR million

Page 7: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

2.2.2017 7

Coworking globally*

The number of coworking spaces has increased from 8,700 in 2015 to 11,300 in 2016

835,000 members in 2016, less than 510,000 in 2015

7,000 operators in 2016

Square meters/person falling constantly toward the benchmark level of 8 m²/person

Share of services has increased substantially in Technopolis’ net sales: from 10.4% in 2014 to 13.0% in 2016

The Shared Economy Meets the Office Market

*Source: Deskmag and Forbes

Page 8: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

2.2.2017 8

Financing

2016 2015 2014

Interest bearing debt, EUR million 959.9 864.8 841.9

Fixed rate, % 56.7 71.3 60.0

Average interest rate, % * 2.34 2.60 2.43

Capital weighted loan maturity, years

5.1 5.9 6.1

Interest cover ratio, % 4.6 4.3 4.8

Loan to value, % 58.2 58.8 59.7

Equity ratio, % 41.5 39.3 38.5

Cash and equivalents, EUR million 128.0 39.4 28.3* Excluding the hybrid loan

Page 9: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

2.2.2017 9

On December 31, 2016, the projects in progress totaled EUR 82.2 million

Area Name m² EUR million

Stabilized yield, % *

Financial OCR/ Pre -OCR, %

Completion

Tallinn Lõõtsa 5 9,200 17.0 8.8 100 1/2016

Tampere Yliopist. 3&4 11,900 39.3 7.2 86.2 7/2016

Vilnius Delta 21,900 35.4 9.8 85.8 12/2016

Helsinki Ruoholahti 3 10,300 33.2 7.0 35.7 07/2018

Tallinn Lõõtsa 12 9,700 13.6 9.0 18.8 07/2018

Organic Growth Projects in 2016

Projects in grey are not completed as per Dec 31, 2016 i.e. financial occupancy is pre-let rate. On Dec 31, 2016, the financial occupancy rate of Delta was 57.9%, the rest of the building was still under construction.* Stabilized yield = estimated net operating income / cost

Page 10: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

102.2.2017

Future Expansion Strategy

Our territory is the Nordic-Baltic region

Focus is on value creationOptimal strategic fit

Best upside potential

Healthy risk-adjusted yield

Divestitures in Finland to continue

Page 11: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

2.2.2017 11

Guidance for 2017Technopolis expects its net sales and EBITDA to improve from 2016 based on the company’s current investment property portfolio and foreign exchange rates.

Yliopistonrinne Campus in Tampere

Page 12: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

www.technopolis.fi Find us on: facebook.com/TechnopolisPlc

twitter.com/TechnopolisPlc

Thank you

Page 13: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

Appendices: Additional Data

Page 14: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

2.2.2017 14

Fair Value Changes in 2016

EUR million MarketYield

Related

OccupancyAssumption

**Modernization

Other Changes *

Projects in

Progress

Total

Finland 18.8 -13.9 -5.4 -6.0 2.5 -4.0

Baltic Rim 4.4 -1.8 -2.8 0.5 5.8 6.1

Scandinavia 5.5 -1.9 -3.6 -1.9 0.0 -1.9

Total 28.7 -17.6 -11.8 -7.4 8.3 0.2

* Other changes include contract and budget changes, maintenance expenses as well as changes in revenue allocations.Contract changes EUR 6.9 million. A write-down in Oulu EUR 5.0 million. In Norway, some revenues were allocated to services and were thus removed from fair value calculation, EUR 1.7 million.** In Oulu and HMA, occupancy assumptions were adjusted to correspond to actualized occupancy and modernization capital expenditures.

Page 15: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

2.2.2017 15

Group

2016 2015 2014

Rentable space, m² * 746,400** 740,400** 742,000

Rent, €/m²/mo. avg.* 17.12 16.99 16.67

Financial occupancy rate, %* 93.4** 94.6** 94.7

Rental income, EUR million 149.4 150.3 144.8

Net sales, EUR million 172.1 170.6 161.7

EBITDA, EUR million 93.1 93.0 87.2

Market yield requirement, avg., % * 7.17 7.73 7.80

Fair value of investment properties, EUR million *

1,624.2 1,426.01,378.4

* At the end of the period.** Under renovation Q4/2016: 13,000 m², 12/2015: 16,700 m²

Page 16: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

2.2.2017 16

Finland2016 2015 2014

Rentable space, m² * 486,500** 526,900** 543,200

Rent, €/m²/mo. avg.* 17.0 17.0 16.8

Financial occupancy rate, % * 90.7** 92.9** 93.7

Rental income, EUR million 102.0 107.4 103.3

Net sales, EUR million 120.5 125.0 118.6

EBITDA, EUR million 64.3 69.0 62.6

Market yield requirement, avg., % * 7.6 7.8 7.9

Fair value of investment properties, EUR million * 997.6 984.8 951.9

* At the end of the period.** 12/2016: 9,700 m² under renovation, 12/2015: 16,700 m².

Page 17: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

2.2.2017 17

Baltic Rim

2016 2015 2014

Rentable space, m² * 161,200 147,000 135,800

Rent, €/m²/mo. avg. * 14.9 15.2 14.00

Financial occupancy rate, % * 99.7 99.5 98.4

Rental income, EUR million 26.7 25.1 23.6

Net sales, EUR million 29.5 26.8 24.9

EBITDA, EUR million 16.6 14.2 13.4

Market yield requirement, avg., % * 8.7 8.7 8.7

Fair value of investment properties, EUR million * 292.3 246.7 224.7* At the end of the period.On December 31, 2016 the new property in Vilnius has still 8,600 m2 of space, which is not yet completed.

Page 18: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

2.2.2017 18

Scandinavia2016 2015 2014

Rentable space, m² * 98,700** 66,500** 63,000

Rent, €/m²/mo. avg. * 22.3 21.5 22.03

Financial occupancy rate, % * 96.8** 97.1** 95.6

Rental income, EUR million 20.7 17.8 18.0

Net sales, EUR million 22.0 18.8 18.2

EBITDA, EUR million 12.2 9.9 12.0

Market yield requirement, avg., % *

5.5 6.16.4

Fair value of investment properties, EUR million * 334.3 194.4 201.8* At the end of the period.** 12/2016: 3,300 m2 under renovation, 12/2015: None.

Page 19: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

2.2.2017 19

Leases

Lease stock, % of space Maturity in years

2016 2015 2014

<1 19 22 17

1-3 21 20 23

3-5 17 15 12

>5 16 19 22

Open-end leases 27 24 26

Av. lease term in months 35 36 39

Lease stock, EUR million 392.7* 429.7 455.9* Main reason for the decreasing contract value is the divestitures.

The ten largest customers let approximately 17.6 % of rented space and accounted for 17.7% of rental income. One single largest customer accounted for 3.9% of rented space and one for 3.1% of rental income.

Page 20: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

2.2.2017 20

2015-2020 Strategic Financial Targets

Average net sales and EBITDA growth 10% p.a.

Service penetration 15% by 2020 for like-for-like real estate

5.5% return on capital employed p.a.

Equity ratio above 35% over the cycle

Page 21: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

212.2.2017

Investment Criteria

Sufficient scale

Good quality assets

Flexibility & adaptability

Location & connections

Service infrastructure potential

Customer mix potential

Competitive valuation with attractive risk-adjusted return

Page 22: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

222.2.2017

Earnings per Share, EUR (EPRA)

0,33

0,41

0,46 0,45

0,40

0,0

0,1

0,1

0,2

0,2

0,3

0,3

0,4

0,4

0,5

0,5

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

EPRA EPS, EUR

Share related indicators have been adjusted for the rights issue in fall 2016.

Page 23: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

232.2.2017

Dividend per Share, EUR

0,18

0,10

0,15

0,17

0,12

5,3 %

2,3 %

4,1 %

4,6 %

3,8 %

0,0 %

1,0 %

2,0 %

3,0 %

4,0 %

5,0 %

6,0 %

0,00

0,02

0,04

0,06

0,08

0,10

0,12

0,14

0,16

0,18

0,20

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Dividend per share, EUR Effective Dividend Yield2016: Board of Directors’ proposal

Page 24: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

2.2.2017 24

Technopolis Investment Story

Technopolis concept brings both higher yields & lower operational risk

Proven track record of building & sustaining high occupancy

Consistently high rental yield relative to cost of capital

Upside to build service revenue & earnings

Effective end-to-end control of the customer experience

Well positioned to exploit trend toward shared working life

Page 25: Technopolis Presentation q4 2016

2.2.2017 25

December 31, 2016 # of shares % of shares

Varma Mutual Pension Insurance Comp. 38,172,288 24.0

Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Comp. 16,634,470 10.5

City of Oulu 3,917,926 2.5

Technopolis Plc 1,947,571 1.2

Laakkonen Mikko 1,939,276 1.2

The Finnish Cultural Foundation 1,782,063 1.1

OP-Pohjola Group 1,660,235 1.1

Odin Eiendom 1,450,000 0.9

Jenny and Antti Wihuri´s Foundation 1,107,597 0.7

Jyrki Hallikainen and company 1,000,000 0.6

10 largest shareholders, total 69,762,210 43.8

Foreign and nominee registered, total 53,796,934 33.9

Others, total 35,920,518 22.3

Total amount of shares 158,793,662 100

Shareholders