30
Roger McLean School of Physical, Environmental and Mathematical Sciences University of New South Wales at the Australian Defence Force Academy Canberra, ACT 2610, Australia Towards a coastal vulnerability typology for small islands: assessing island diversity (and similarity) via a common framework Wed 8 July Landscapes of Our Common Future: Session 2210:Coastal Impacts of Climate Change Our Common Future under Climate Change

Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Roger McLean School of Physical, Environmental and Mathematical Sciences

University of New South Wales at the Australian Defence Force Academy

Canberra, ACT 2610, Australia

Towards a coastal vulnerability

typology for small islands:

assessing island diversity (and

similarity) via a common framework

Wed 8 July Landscapes of Our Common Future:

Session 2210:Coastal Impacts of Climate Change

Our Common Future under Climate Change

Page 2: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

1. Need to acknowledge the heterogeneity and

complexity of small island states and territories

2. Need to better understand within

country/territory differences in vulnerability

3. Need to include a range of climate-change

related projections and not just temperature and

sea level

IPCC AR5 WGII – Chapter 29 Small islands

One of the key messages Small islands do not have uniform climate

change risk profiles.

Research and needs challenges:

Page 3: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Australian Government

responded through the

Pacific-Australia Climate

Change Science and

Adaptation Programme

(PACCSAP) funded by AusAID

administered by Department

of the Environment).

Commissioned regional study

of coastal susceptibility

based on geomorphic

characteristics of Pacific

Islands and climate–ocean

drivers.

Page 4: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Aims of project:

1. Identify typical island types for 15 partner

countries in Pacific – data base of 1532 islands

2. Develop a regional-scale ‘indicative susceptibiity’

of island coasts using simple criteria

3. Identify key climate-ocean processes now and in

the future that can result in coastal change

4. Develop a regional-scale ‘coastal sensitivity’

based on geomorphic characteristics and

relevant climate-ocean processes

5. And ultimately develop a regional coastal

vulnerabiiity assessment

Page 5: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

1. Island Types

Based on two criteria:

Lithology (rock type)- 5 types • volcanic

• limestone

• composite

• unconsolidated sediment (reef)

• continental

Elevation • high > 30 m above sea level

• low < 30 m above sea level

8 Island types

Page 6: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

1/2. Volcanic High and Low Islands: Islands composed of at least 80% igneous rock with 30m above MSL to separate high and low islands

3/4. Limestone High and Low Islands: Islands composed of at least 80% calcareous rock with 30m above MSL to separate high and low islands.

Bellona, Solomon

Islands

Luon. Solomon

Islands

Tomowas, Federated

States of Micronesia

Lifuka, Tonga

Page 7: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Aniwa, Vanuatu

5/6. Composite High and Low Islands: Islands composed of both volcanic and limestone rock types with each type being <80%, with 30m above MSL to separate high and low islands

7. Reef Islands: Islands composed of at least 80% unconsolidated sediments and < 10m high.

Aitutaki, Cook

Islands

Onotoa, Kiribati

Vaitupu, Tuvalu

8. Continental Islands: Islands composed of at least 80% continental rocks e.g granite (Grande Terre, New Caledonia)

Page 8: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Island Types

Island types

by area

Island types

by number

Page 9: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Island types

in 15 Pacific

Island

Countries

by number

Island types in

15 Pacifc

Island

Countries by

area

Page 10: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

2. ‘Indicative Susceptibility’ of Island Types

Certain island types are inherently more susceptible (less

resistant) to physical change than others.

Four variables:

• lithology/rock-type (for erodability-hard rock to soft

sediment; drainage-surface/subsurface)

• maximum elevation (higher less susceptible)

• island area (larger less susceptible)

• island shape (circularity) (angular more susceptible has

longer shoreline)

were used to develop a measure of indicative susceptibility.

Page 11: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

A five-point scale susceptibility rating was derived for all

1,532 islands and for the island types within each country.

‘Indicative’ Susceptibility

Luon V 2 0.9 1 49 m 2 5 km2 4 Total 9 Low

Bellona L 4 0.7 2 79 m 2 23 km2 3 Total 11 Mod

Onotoa R 5 0.2 4 2 m 5 4 km2 4 Total 18 V

High

Page 12: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Island ‘Indicative Susceptibility’

Page 13: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Downscaling Indicative Susceptibility: 6 criteria

Adding more

criteria (11) Backshore: height

,sediment

Intertidal: platform

mangrove

Reef: fringing, barrier

Subtidal: slope

Page 14: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Coastal Sectors

Luon Island

• volcanic

• sheltered

• fringing reefs

• rocky bluffs

• 3 coast types

• 6 sectors

• all moderate

susceptibiity

Page 15: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Aitutaki

• composite

• 2 contrasting

island types

• 11 coastal

sectors

Susceptibility

1.1 High

1.2 & 3 Mod

2.1-2.5 Low

Page 16: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

3. Climate-ocean processes that result

in coastal coastal change:

present and future

• Tidal type and range

• Ocean waves and swell

• Tropical cyclones

• Sea level and ENSO

Page 17: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Diurnal: Lonbrum PNG

Tidal type

Semi-diurnal Betio Kiribati

Page 18: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Tidal Range (m)

Page 19: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Pacific Wave Climate

1.Trade wind waves

2.Westerly storm waves

3.Distant- source swell

4. Tropical storm waves

Page 20: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Sea Level

Change

1993-2009

Average sea

level with

ENSO phase

El Nino

La Nina

Page 21: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Sea Level • Global sea level will continue to rise and likely accelerate.

• Projections for 2081-2100 (relative to 1986-2005) range from

0.26-0.55 m (RCP 2.6) to 0.45-0.82 m (RCP 8.5).

• Strong regional deviations from global projections of 10-20

% can be expected in tropical Pacific.

• ENSO will remain dominant driver inter-annual variability

Tides • Tide character unlikely to change except in enclosed seas

• Effect of sea-level rise felt most in areas of low tidal range –

base of mean tidal envelope could be raised

above present MSL or even high water.

Projected changes to climate-ocean

processes to 2100

Page 22: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Waves • Decrease in Hs of c.7% (0.1m) along the equator .

• Pole-ward shift in extra-tropical cyclone belts-reduce

damaging distant-source swells.

• Increase in trade winds in SH subtropics.

• Decrease in Hs over most oceans but increase in

Southern Ocean affects south coasts of islands.

Tropical cyclones and storms • Global frequency expected to decrease or remain

unchanged.

• Global increase in TC intensity/maximum wind speed.

• Equator-ward movement of TC tracks in NH;

pole-ward in SH.

Page 23: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Incorporates 2 main factors into measure:

1.Indicative susceptibility of islands/coasts

2.Key projected coastal processes in Pacific

Water level: Tide range + ENSO range

Waves: Wave height (Hs) + TC

Sea-level: Sea-level change + max tide

4. Coastal (Geomorphic) Sensitivity

to Change

Page 24: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Composite Water Level

Tide range + ENSO range

Page 25: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

TC frequency + Wave height

Page 26: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Projected sea level

2055 with high tide (m)

Page 27: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Coastal (geomorphic) sensitivity

Page 28: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Summary: Developed a consistent and

defensible framework towards a regional

vulnerability assessment. But it falls short.

Need:

1.To develop a coastal typology

(like the island types) that is

appropriate

across the region (25 to 30 coast types)

2. To add human factors- settlement,

land use, population, infrastructure

etc

3. Upscale from coastal segment to whole

island to all islands

Page 29: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin
Page 30: Mclean r 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_herpin

Thank You

Thanks to colleagues Patrick Nunn, Laiit Kumar, Ian Eliot.

And to Neil Lazarow, Kiri Yapp, Sam Hussey-Smith, Dominic

Ransan-Cooper, Lalarge Cherry of the Australian Govt

Department of Climate Change and Dept of the Environment