View
1.332
Download
2
Category
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
by Chiyuki Uehara
Citation preview
Potential for Supplier Assurance in the Asian Market
Chiyuki UeharaAeon Co., Ltd.
August 26, 2010
2
Outline of Aeon Group
Operating results (Fiscal year ended February 2009)
Total revenues \5,230 billion Operating profit \ 124 billion
Number of companies 182 (As of February, 2009)
Number of stores per formats
GMS (General Merchandising Stores) 601
Discount stores 158
Super Markets 1,231
Convenience stores 3,720
Specialty stores 4,748
Other operations 2,148
Total 12,156 stores
601店舗
158店舗
1,231店舗
3 , 270店舗
4,748店舗
2,148店舗
Expanding Aeon’s operation in 8 countries in Asia
3
Aeon’s private brand products has been expanded to 5,000 items including clothing, food and housing and sold at 8,000 stores.
Expansion of private brand products
050
100150200250
300350400
450500
Annual sales of private brand
(Unit=Billion Yen)
Private brand products
4
Global standard
Aeon standard
Food Safety Management Systems
Good Practices (GAP,GMP,GDP)
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) principles
Corporate philosophy
Brand concept
Quality and CoC requirements
Use of private standard
Adoption of GFSI standard
Implementation of GFSI benchmarked standard
Agricultural field
GAP
GMP
TransportationTransportation
We are responsible for quality control on total supply chain and provision of product information for customer.
We ask our suppliers compliance with Aeon’s code of conduct which includes requirements on environmental and ethical issues.
Factory Store
Ensuring food safety system by global standard implementation
GDP
Food safety management system
GAP implementation activities in Japan
7
• Existence of various GAP impose various procedures on producers
• There are needs for high level
GAP based on scientific knowledge and on demands of consumers and retailers.
• Target : 2,000 producer’s groups ( by 2011 )
• Existence of various GAP impose various procedures on producers
• There are needs for high level
GAP based on scientific knowledge and on demands of consumers and retailers.
• Target : 2,000 producer’s groups ( by 2011 )
• Ministry of Agriculture held the committee and made GAP Guideline for food safety, sustainability, and workers’ safety.
• Leaders’ training is on going for GAP introduction into producer’s groups.
• Ministry of Agriculture is trying to get consumers’ confidence by implementing upgraded GAP .
• Ministry of Agriculture held the committee and made GAP Guideline for food safety, sustainability, and workers’ safety.
• Leaders’ training is on going for GAP introduction into producer’s groups.
• Ministry of Agriculture is trying to get consumers’ confidence by implementing upgraded GAP .
GAP Guideline was published by Ministry of Agriculture in April 2010.
Outline of GAP activities in Japan(1)
8
Number of producer’s groups that have
introduced GAP
Jul. 2007
Dec. 2007
Jul. 2008
Mar. 2009
• Many small size farmers
• Cooperative produce handling
• Certification cost & education system for covering a various number of farmers
Feature of Agriculture in Japan
Problems on acquisition of certification
Outline of GAP activities in Japan(2)
9
Promotion of GFSI benchmarked GAP
Field study Interpretation meeting Sharing information
Key issues for promotion activities:• Ensuring feasibility for Japanese farmers - Consideration of Japanese agriculture situation (ex. Many small size farmers)
• Practical level understanding through interpretation by various stakeholders including farmers, retailers, CBs, consultants and other experts.
GMP&FSMS implementation activities
11
GFSI Global Market TC pilot project (1)
In globalized food supply chain, procurement from less developed businesses and small suppliers has been increased. The level needs to be raised for offering safe food.
The following issues are important for upgrading the level. 1. Leaders who introduce the knowledge of food safety in developing countries and at small and medium sized companies needs to be raised.
2. Multiligualized education tool is necessary for food business which hasn’t acquire GFSI benchmarked standard.
Global market TC pilot project has started as a measure of food safety for small suppliers
12
GFSI Global Market TC pilot project (2)
multilingualizationlinkage
Basic level
Intermediate level
Certificate
FSKN( Food Safety Knowledge Network)⇒E-learningRaising the level of control ability on food safety for QC stuff at less developed businesses and small food suppliers.
Global Market⇒Self checklist for audit and evaluation guidelineRaising the level internally by using check list and evaluation guideline at two levels (basic and intermediate level)
Raising the level
+
13
Secretariat: 5 stuff members at quality control dept. of Aeon Malaysia - with experience of factory audit or store sanitary control and FSSC 2200 auditor training courses
Target:12 suppliers of private brand products of Aeon Malaysia
Contents : - Pre- level check test regarding food safety and sanitary control - Face to face FMS training using E-learning system of FSKN - HACCP training by external experts - Instruction including post-evaluation from Quality control dept. at Aeon
Pilot project by Aeon Malaysia (1)
14
Pilot project by Aeon Malaysia (2)
Participant Feedback:- Appreciation for having the training to Aeon Malaysia- Request more seat availability for next HACCP training- Interests in this program and intention for effective use of this program- Expectation for the audit
12-May 27-Jul HACCP
1 Degree QC 88 88 762 Degree QC 84 90 763 B Degree Ow ner 100 92 844 C Degree Ow ner 56 64 525 D Secondary Ow ner - - Absent6 Degree Marketing 56 - 607 Degree Marketing 24 - Absent8 Degree Ow ner 28 56 369 Secondary Asst.Fac Mgr 32 - Absent
10 Secondary Production/QC 40 64 4811 Secondary Store Keeper 32 72 2812 H Diploma Production/QC 84 - Absent
Business
A
FManufacturer of sushi
E
Company's NamenoEducation
levelposition
test
ingredient
GManufacturer fortamoginiyaki
Frozen Pizza
Cookies
Tofu
Cordial drink
Brow nies and CakesPackaging of nuts
15
•Support for small suppliers
( Education and tool)
• Effective certification system
(Cost effectiveness and time efficiency)
• Placement of contact person adjusting local issues
for global harmonization
For further implementation of supplier assurance
16
Thank you!
Recommended