Menyusun Bab II

Menyusun Bab II

Rossi Sanusi9 Mei 2014

Program Pra Doktor

Bagian Utama Proposal

I. Pendahuluan

II. Telaah Pustaka

III. Metoda Penelitian

IV. Rencana Pelaksanaan Penelitian

V. Daftar Rujukan

Tujuan Telaah Pustaka

1. Mengidentifikasi Masalah Penelitian yang aktual:

Masalah yang dihadapi para peneliti saat ini tentang suatu topik Kerangka konsep yang tidak valid atau/dan Rancangan penelitian yang tidak valid.

2. Mencari informasi untuk:Menyusun kerangka konsep yang lebih valid atau/dan Rancangan penelitian yang lebih valid.

• Masalah Praktis = masalah yang dihadapi para praktisi kesenjangan antara keadaan yang ingin dicapai dan keadaan sekarang.

• Para peneliti memecahkan sebagian dari masalah yang dihadapi para praktisi.

Masalah praktis timbul karena masalah penelitian belum dipecahkan?

Praktisi mempertimbangkan banyak variabel

Peneliti fokus pada suatu topik

Mengidentifikasi Masalah Penelitian Aktual*

• Actual (Shift F7): real, definite, genuine, authentic, concrete, tangible.

• Melalui systematic review (SR) makalah-makalah penelitian empirik.

• Telaah sistematik pustaka yg valid lebih meningkatkan aktualitas masalah penelitian dibandingkan jenis telaah pustaka yl.

Reviews of increasing complexity from narrative to systematic reviews...

Sumber: http://hlwiki.slais.ubc.ca/index.php/Scoping_reviews

Telaah Pustaka?

“Topik” Kata KunciSR

Sebelumnya

Masalah Penelitian

(awal)SR

Selanjutnya

Masalah Penelitian

Latar Belakang,

etc. Kerangka

Konsep, etc

Rancangan Penelitian,

etc.

Contoh:• Topik: Dukungan sistem manajemen SDM

untuk meningkatkan produktivitas.• Kata Kunci: productivity, systems support,

health care workers.• SR Sebelumnya:

Preventive staff-support interventions for health workers van Wyk,B.E., et al. 2010 (Strong).

• Masalah Penelitian:

• Ten studies involving 716 participants met the criteria for inclusion. Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials of interventions to support healthcare workers in coping with work-related stress, preventing burnout and improving job satisfaction, without changing contractual conditions of service or physical work environment. Three types of interventions were included in this review: (1) support groups for staff; (2) training in stress management techniques; and (3) management interventions for supporting staff.

• None assessed the effects of support groups for health workers

• There is insufficient evidence for the effectiveness of stress management training interventions to reduce job stress and prevent burnout among healthcare workers beyond the intervention period. Low quality evidence suggests that longer-term interventions with refresher or booster sessions may have more sustained positive effect, but this needs to be rigorously evaluated in further trials.

• Low quality evidence exists to show that management interventions may improve some measures of job satisfaction. However, further trials are needed to assess whether this finding is replicable in other settings. There was insufficient evidence of the benefit of management interventions on staff absenteeism.

• Rigorous trials are needed to assess the effects of longer-term stress management training and management interventions in primary care and developing country settings.

• Masalah Penelitian (Awal): Apakah kelompok pendukung, pelatihan teknik manajemen stress dan intervensi manajemen berdayaguna meningkatkan produktivitas petugas kesehatan?

Tujuan Penelitian: melakukan penelitian experimen murni jangka panjang.

• SR Selanjutnya:1. Masalah Penelitian awal.2. Jaring makalah2 penelitian empirik 2008-

2014.3. Critical Appraisal makalah2 yg memenuhi

kriteria seleksi.4. Sintesis Masalah Penelitian yang lebih

aktual5. Menyimpulkan Kerangka konsep &

rancangan penelitian yg lebih valid.