T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) , M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK),

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Realistic Particle Flow Algorithm for GLD. T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) , M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK), T.Fujikawa (Tohoku), A.Miyamoto (KEK), S.Yamashita (ICEPP), on behalf of ACFA-SIM-J Group. Contents : 1. Introduction 2. Procedure of PFA - Small Clustering - Gamma Finding - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

1

T.Yoshioka (ICEPP), M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK),T.Fujikawa (Tohoku), A.Miyamoto (KEK), S.Yamashita (ICEPP),

on behalf of ACFA-SIM-J Group

Realistic Particle Flow Algorithmfor GLD

Contents :1. Introduction2. Procedure of PFA

- Small Clustering- Gamma Finding- Track Matching

3. Results4. Summary

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

2

Introduction- Most of the important physics processes studied in the future linear collider experiments have multi-jets in the final state.

→ Precise Jet reconstruction is essential.

- Since the momentum resolution of the charged particle is much better than the energy resolution of the calorimeter, we use

Trackers for charged particlesCalorimeters for neutral particles

for Jet reconstruction. → Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA)

- In this talk, we present a performance of the PFA using a full simulator of GLD named Jupiter.

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

3

- End view

Thanks to Y.Yamaguchi (Tsukuba)

- Side view

Barrel Tower Front : 210cm Endcap Inner R : 40cm Endcap Tower Front Z : 270cm

Calorimeter Geometry in Jupiter

40 cm270 cm

210 cm 210 cm

- Consists of tower structure.

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

4

Thanks to Y.Yamaguchi (Tsukuba)

- Tower

- # of Layers ECAL : 38 HCAL : 130

- Side view

Barrel Tower Front : 210cm Endcap Inner R : 40cm Endcap Tower Front Z : 270cm

Calorimeter Geometry in Jupiter

40 cm270 cm

210 cm

Full One Tower  ECAL + HCAL

ECAL

HCAL

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

5

Thanks to Y.Yamaguchi (Tsukuba)

- Cell

- Cell Size EM : 4cm x 4cm HD : 12cm x 12cmCan be changed easily.

- Tower

- # of Layers ECAL : 38 HCAL : 130

- Side view

Barrel Tower Front : 210cm Endcap Inner R : 40cm Endcap Tower Front Z : 270cm

Calorimeter Geometry in Jupiter

40 cm270 cm

210 cm

Full One Tower  ECAL + HCAL

27 X0

6.1λ

ECAL

HCAL

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

6

Energy Deposit in a Cell

ECAL HCAL

- Z → qq-bar(q = u,d,s)@91.187GeV.

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

7

PFA Procedure

1.Small Clustering (collect fired cells with its neighbors) → Define thrust and broadening for each small cluster.2. Gamma Finding (Separate gamma/e to hadron) → Small Cluster based.3. Cluster-Track Matching (Separate charged to neutral) → Calorimeter Cell based.

Note: → Cheating method is used for charged hadrons in

the Endcap region. → Assuming the remaining clusters be neutral hadrons.

Flow

to make P

FO

bject

- Current Scheme of the PFA

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

8

Small Clustering

(1) Find the “starting cell” among those “fired cell” in ECAL and HCAL which contains the highest energy deposition.(2) From the “starting cell”, find its “fired” neighbor cells to form a small cluster.

Starting Cell(Highest energy cell)

Neighbor Cells“Fired” = edep>50keV

If the cluster energyexceeds 50MeV(beforecalibration), the clusteringis stopped.

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

9

Small Cluster Distributions

Number of hitsin a small cluster

Small ClusterEnergy

- Z → qq-bar(q = u,d,s)@91.187GeV.

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

10

Variables for Small Cluster

i i

i ii

i i

i ii

X

EnXB

X

EnXT

||

||

||

||

- Energy-weighted Thrust & Broadening

Center of thesmall cluster

Thrust axis (n)Direction from the center to each hit (Xi)

- Thrust axis n is defined as to maximize the T.

Small Cluster

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

11

Thrust and Broadening

Thrust Broadening

- Z → qq-bar(q = u,d,s)@91.187GeV.

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

12

Gamma Finding Procedure

(1) Fit the longitudinal profile of the energy deposit of a small cluster as an electromagnetic cascade.(2) Make a cut on the distance from the nearest track.(3) Compare energy sum between HCAL/ECAL within a tube.

Details of the gamma finding algorithm/performance are describedby next speaker (T.Fujikawa)

So far, we achieved Efficiency : 60%, Purity : 99%.

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

13

Track Matching Procedure- Basic Concept : Extrapolate the charged track and calculate a distance between a calorimeter hit cell and the extrapolated track. Connect the cell that in a certain tube radius (clustering).

Charged TrackCalorimeter input position

Hit Cellsdistance

ECAL

HCAL

- Tube radius for ECAL and HCAL can be changed separately.

- Calculate the distance for any track/calorimeter cell combination.

Extrapolated Track

Tube Radius

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

14

Track Matching Procedure

(1) Sum up calorimeter cell energies within a tube for a track (Ecluster).(2) If Ecluster > Etrack x (0.4 x nsigma + 1), stop the clustering for the track. If not, perform (1) for each track. (We assume the calorimeter resolution of 40%.)(3) Widen the tube radius (only a Rstep) and perform (1) and (2) again.(4) Perform (1)-(3) until the tube radius reach the max radius (Rmax).

Parameters (nsigma, Rstep and Rmax) should be optimized.

- More detail of the procedure…

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

15

Distance Distribution

ECAL HCAL

- Z → qq-bar(q = u,d,s)@91.187GeV.

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

16

Efficiency/Purity- Efficiency/Purity of Track Matching is checked by cheating method.

Efficiency : 86.4% Purity : 82.2%

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

17

Event Display

e+

e-

Just in order to get a feelingof current procedure…

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

18

Event Display

Z → qq-bar

Red : pionYellow : gammaBlue : neutron

e+

e-

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

19

Event Display

At first, charged hadrons in Endcap regionare removed by cheating method.

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

20

Event Display

After Endcap cheating…

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

21

Event Display

In the next, e/gamma like clustersare removed by “Gamma Finding”.

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

22

Event Display

After e/gamma finding…

Note Efficiency : 60%Purity : 99%

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

23

Event Display

Then, Then, calorimeter hits near the extrapolatedtrack are collected by “Track Matching”.

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

24

Event Display

Remaining clusters are assumedto be neutral hadrons.

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

25

Z Energy Resolution

Sum up Calorimeter Energy Particle Flow Algorithm

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

26

Change Calorimeter Cell SizeEM : 4cm x 4cmHD : 12cm x 12cm

EM : 1cm x 1cmHD : 1cm x 1cm

- In the current method, the resolution is not improved so much by fine segmentation. → Another method should be considered in this case. (tracking and vertex finding in calorimeter, etc…)

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

27

Can We Improve More?

pn

K

pi

KL

e/gamma: EC cheating: e/gamma finding: track matching: remaining hits

Particle ID of hit cell- Current e/gamma finding efficiency is ~60%. → Improve efficiency while keeping high purity.

- There are still ~10% charged hadrons after track matching. → Optimize parameters (Tube radius etc…)

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

28

e/gamma Contamination

Track matching purity

Track matching purity w/o e/gamma

- If e/gamma contamination are removed (by cheating), the track matching purity improve from 82.2% to 92.2%.

→ Z energy resolution would also be improved.

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

29

Track Matching Performance- Collected calorimeter energy minus track energy

- Lower tail indicates that current tube radius is narrow (not efficiently collected energy).

1. Optimize parameters.

2. Energy dependent tube radius?

7/13/2005 The 8th ACFA Workshop@EXCO, Daegu, Korea

30

Summary and Future

- Realistic Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA) for GLD is developed and the performance is checked.

- Gamma Finding : Efficiency : 60%, Purity : 99%(Details will be presented by T.Fujikawa)

- Track Matching : Efficiency : 86.4%, Purity : 82.2%- Z energy resolution : 40%/sqrt(E)

- Goal : 30%/sqrt(E) of Z energy resolution.- Treat Endcap properly.- Improve gamma finding efficiency.- Optimize track matching parameters.

Recommended