View
140
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes
The 6th WaveProcess and Outcomes
Jesse Marsh6wave Coordinator
6th Wave Launch Ceremony
2Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes13-04-23
Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 2The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes
• Openness– Opportunity for all potential Living Labs
• Transparency– Clear rules, criteria and processes
• Fairness– Objectivity, avoiding conflict of interest
ENoLL Waves: Terms of Reference
3Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes13-04-23
Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 3The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes
ENoLL Waves 1-5
4Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes13-04-23
Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 4The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes
• 119 pre-registrations• 72 proposals submitted• 71 eligible proposals
6wave applications
5Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes13-04-23
Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 5The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes
• 6 evaluation teams of 3 members each– All ENoLL members– Team members from different countries– Team leaders with previous experience
• 12 proposals per team– 3 readers minimum for each proposal– None from same country
• X-Team cross-evaluations– 1 common and 1 specific from each team
Evaluation teams
6Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes13-04-23
Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 6The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes
• Scores of 0-5 for each of the 20 criteria• Aggregated averages for each of the 5 groups– Organisation, openness, resources, users and
reality, value
• Total score of aggregate values• Scores averaged for each team• Thresholds for both group and total scores
Evaluation scoring
7Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes13-04-23
Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 7The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes
1. Individual evaluators read and score2. Teams reach consensus and submit3. All results compiled, thresholds adjusted4. Team results compared with each other and
X-Team scores5. Teams revise scoring for overall coherence6. Final results compiled, consensus reached7. Results sent to ENoLL Council for approval
Evaluation phases
8Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes13-04-23
Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 8The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes
• Where are the users? Weak involvement in co-design, lack of methodology
• Project, not innovation ecosystem• Excessive technology push / insufficient ICT• Weak, closed, or limited partnerships, lack of
commitment and/or resources• Future plans, little experience• Lack of focus, limited value and impact
Typical weaknesses
9Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes13-04-23
Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 9The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes
• 46 Living Labs selected• 31 EU members, from 7 countries• 15 Non-EU members (33%), from 8 countries
Results
10Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes
Waves 1-6
11Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes13-04-23
Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 11The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes
ENoLL today
12Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes
6° Wave by Country
13Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes13-04-23
Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 13The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes
ENoLL by Continent
14Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes13-04-23
Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 14The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes
Date of Constitution
15Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes13-04-23
Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 15The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes
Thematic domains
16Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes13-04-23
Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 16The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes
• Compile and send your info leaflet• Register with the ENoLL site• Choose your membership profile• Express your interest in a Working Group• Join one or more Thematic Domain Networks
and...
• Stay around for the group photo!
Welcome to ENoLL!
17Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes13-04-23
Mechelen, 23 May, 2012 17The 6th Wave Process and Outcomes
• Jesse Marsh, 6° wave coordinator• Álvaro Oliveira and Mikael Börjeson, Task Force core
group• Pieter Balloon and Anna Kivilehto, secretarial support• Francesco Molinari, member analyses• The ENoLL evaluation team...and our thanks to all proposers
Thank you for your attention