View
1.394
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation to Swdish Association of Local Authorities and Regions
Citation preview
www.valuescentre.com 1www.valuescentre.comwww.valuescentre.com
A Global Perspective on Values Development
[email protected] – January 2011
Hello my name is Phil, I am very happy to be here.
Hej mitt namn är Phil, jag är mycket glad att vara här
I have a question for you.....
Jag har en fråga till dig .....
If your email in-box is empty, your task list is complete, all your projects have come to successful conclusion, your relationships at home and at work are in great shape & you feel in a place of perfect peace and calm ....
.......... please raise your hand.
Om din email låda är tom, din åtgärdslista avklarad, alla dina projekt framgångsrikt genomförda, dina relationer hemma och på jobbet är på topp och du känner dig perfekt, lugn och i harmoni .......
....... vänligen, räck upp din hand!
Me too
Jag också
Relax your shoulders. Take a deep breath.
Slappna av i axlarna. Ta ett djupt andetag.
Now we will take a few minutes to slow down our thoughts....... keep breathing
Nu kommer vi att ta några minuter att sakta ner våra tankar ....... Fortsätt andas
9
The purpose of our lives is to be happy Dalai
Lama
Happiness is the extent to which you live in love, as opposed to living in fear. Phil
Clothier
13
Values – The building blocks of culture
14
1. client satisfaction 2. making a difference3. integrity 4. teamwork 5. humour/fun 6. quality 7. ethics8. financial stability
1. blame L2. short term focus L3. internal competition L4. buck passing L5. risk averse L6. customer satisfaction 7. information hoarding L8. profit
What is culture?
Talent Financial viability
Excellence Ethics Resilience
15
1. partnerships2. community involvement3. customer focus4. accessible to everyone5. working together6. bureaucracy (L)7. public service ethic8. making a difference9. flexibility10. achievement11. environmental awareness
What is culture?
1. confusion (L)2. blame (L)3. manipulation (L)4. power (L)5. bureaucracy (L)6. internal competition (L)7. job insecurity (L)8. information hoarding (L)9. control (L)10. exploitation (L)11. hierarchy (L)12. long hours (L)
Government Departments
Cultural Entropy 68% Cultural Entropy 18%
16
Values under Pressure
17
18
Iceland
Entropy 54%
August 2007
2007
19
Latvia
Latvia Government dissolved after failure to
agree budget - 2007
20
21
Latvian and Russian Desired Culture
1. caring for elderly 293 Level 4
2. economic growth 279 Level 1
3. concern for future generations
252 Level 7
4. job security 214 Level 1
5. environmental awareness
186 Level 6
6. caring for the disadvantaged
172 Level 4
7. affordable housing 165 Level 1
8. education 148 Level 4
9. honesty 142 Level 5
10. prosperity 141 Level 1
1. economic growth 155 Level 1
2. caring for elderly 150 Level 4
3. affordable housing 99 Level 1
4. concern for future generations
90 Level 7
5. job security 89 Level 1
6. social justice 85 Level 4
7. caring for the disadvantaged
84 Level 4
8. environmental awareness 77 Level 6
9. human rights 74 Level 7
10. material wealth 73 Level 1
Latvian desired culture Russian desired culture
22
title
23
The Value of Values
Latvia Sustainable Development Strategy until 2030http://www.latvija2030.lv/page/320
24
The Big Society
All the managers and leaders [of the successful projects] aim to develop new services and policies with rather than for the people.
Christian Bason, Mindlab, Denmark
25
Organisational transformation starts
with the personal transformation of the
leaders
26
It all starts with me
27
Values Beliefs & Behaviours
AccountabilityAchievementBalance (home/work)CommitmentCompassionCompetenceContinuous learningCooperationCourageCreativityEnthusiasmEfficiencyEthics
ExcellenceFairnessFamilyFinancial gainFriendshipsFuture generationsHealthHonestyHumor/funIndependenceIntegrityInitiativeIntuition
Making a differenceOpen communicationOpennessPersonal fulfillmentPersonal growthPowerRespectResponsibilityRisk-takingSelf-disciplineSuccessTrustWisdom
1) Choose three values that are important to you in your life2) What are your beliefs that support these values3) What behaviours do you exhibit that support these values
28
Värderingar, övertygelser och beteenden
AnsvarBalans (hem/arbete)EffektivitetEkonomisk vinningEngagemangEntusiasmEtikExcellensFamiljFramgångFramtida generationerGöra skillnad/något betydelsefulltHumor/glädje
HälsaInitiativIntegritetIntuitionKompetensKreativitetMaktMedkänslaModPersonlig utvecklingPrestationRespektRisktagande
RättvisaSamarbeteSjälvdisciplinSjälvförverkligandeSjälvständighetStändigt lärandeTillit och förtroendeVishetVänskapÄrlighetÖppen kommunikationÖppenhet
1) Välj tre värdeord i listan nedan som är viktiga för dig i ditt liv. 2) Vilka övertygelser har du som stödjer detta värdeord?3) Vilka beteenden uppvisar du som stödjer detta värdeord?
29
Five Modes of Decision MakingSix
30
Six Modes of Decision Making
Based on past: DNA encoded reaction. Action precedes thought.
Based on past: Learned reaction. Action precedes thought.
Based on past: Considered response. Pause between event and response.
Future orientation. Consciously creating the future.
Based on what wants to emerge.Tap into the collective unconscious
Intuition
Instincts
Sub Conscious Beliefs
Conscious Beliefs
Values
Your soul is calling. You need to do this!Inspiration
31
Values
Values - A shorthand method of describing our individual and collective motivations and what is important to us.
Values can be positive or potentially limiting.
Positive Values: trust, creativity, passion, honesty, integrity, clarity
Potentially Limiting Values: power, blame, greed, status, being liked
32
Culture
The way things are done around here
The culture of an organisation or any group of individuals is a reflection of the values, beliefs and behaviours of leaders of the group.
33
Maslow’s Needs to Barrett’s Consciousness
Know and Understand
Physiological
Safety
Love & Belonging
Self-esteemAbraham Maslow
Know and Understand
N e e d s C o n s c i o u s n e s s
Self-Actualization
Richard Barrett
34
7 Levels of Organisational Consciousness
Positive Focus / Excessive Focus
Service
Making a Difference
Internal Cohesion
Transformation
Self-esteem
Relationship
SurvivalFinancial StabilityShareholder value, organisational growth, employee health, safety. Control, corruption, greed
Employee RecognitionLoyalty, open communication, customer satisfaction, friendship. Manipulation, blame
High PerformanceSystems, processes, quality, best practices, pride in performance. Bureaucracy, complacency
Continuous Renewal and LearningAccountability, adaptability, empowerment, teamwork, goals orientation, personal growth
Building Internal CommunityShared values, vision, commitment, integrity, trust, passion, creativity, openness, transparency
Strategic Alliances and PartnershipsEnvironmental awareness, community involvement, employee fulfilment, coaching/mentoring
Service To Humanity and the PlanetSocial responsibility, future generations, long-term perspective, ethics, compassion, humility
35
7 Levels & Sustainability
Service
Making a Difference
Internal Cohesion
Transformation
Self-esteem
Relationship
Survival Profit - Economic stability
Harmonious relationships
Organisational effectiveness
Continuous renewal
Cultural Alignment
Planet - Environment
People - Society
36
Where are you?
37
Survey Questions
1) Personal ValuesPlease select ten of the following values/behaviours that most reflect who you are, not who you desire to become.
2) Current National Culture ValuesPlease select ten of the following values/behaviours that most reflect how your organisation currently operates.
3) Desired National Culture ValuesPlease select ten of the following values/behaviours that you would desire for your organisation to achieve it's highest performance.
38www.valuescentre.com
CBT Staff (154)
Level 7
Level 6
Level 5
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Personal Values Current Culture Values Desired Culture Values
PL= 10-0 | IRS (P)= 7-3-0 | IRS (L)= 0-0-0 PL= 4-6 | IROS (P)= 0-0-4-0 | IROS (L)= 1-0-5-0 PL= 10-0 | IROS (P)= 1-2-7-0 | IROS (L)= 0-0-0-0
Matches
PV - CC 0CC - DC 1PV - DC 1
1. honesty 61 Level 5
2. commitment 60 Level 5
3. humor/fun 53 Level 5
4. reliability 51 Level 3
5. enthusiasm 44 Level 5
6. adaptability 43 Level 4
7. family 37 Level 2
8. integrity 34 Level 5
9. trust 34 Level 5
10. balance (home/work) 32 Level 4
Black Underline = PV & CC Orange = CC & DC P = Positive L = Potentially Limiting I = Individual O = Organizational
Orange = PV, CC & DC Blue = PV & DC (white circle) R = Relationship S = Societal
1. cost reduction 76 Level 1
2. bureaucracy (L) 66 Level 3
3. confusion (L) 61 Level 3
4. profit 54 Level 1
5. information hoarding (L)
47 Level 3
6. short-term focus (L) 47 Level 1
7. hierarchical (L) 45 Level 3
8. results orientation 39 Level 3
9. client focus 38 Level 2
10. empire building (L) 36 Level 2
1. client satisfaction 66 Level 2
2. employee fulfillment 65 Level 6
3. continuous improvement 58 Level 4
4. effective communication 56 Level 2
5. teamwork 50 Level 4
6. financial stability 44 Level 1
7. adaptability 42 Level 4
8. client focus 38 Level 2
9. professionalism 35 Level 3
10. vision 35 Level 7
Values Plot Copyright 2008 Barrett Values Centre August 2008
39
40
Cost of Limiting Values
• Short-term Focus£3,489,818
• Confusion£3,178,636
• Bureaucracy (unnecessary)£1,799,618
• Empire Building£1,764,682
• Information Hoarding£1,634,045
• Sickness and Leavers £834,225
• Hierarchical £624,327
• Long Hours £187,909
• Total Entropy (potential business value) £13,504,261
Based on staff’s perception of lost productivity and opportunity. Annual income £33,000,000 and loss of £500,000 in 2000.
Investment Leadership – Jim Ware’s book contains data showing the comparison between healthy and unhealthy cultures and bottom line performance.
41
Barrett Values Centre: Group (15)
Level 7
Level 6
Level 5
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Personal Values Current Culture Values Desired Culture Values
IRS (P)= 4-1-1 | IRS (L)= 0-0-0 IROS (P)= 3-1-7-1 | IROS (L)= 0-0-1-0 IROS (P)= 1-3-5-0 | IROS (L)= 0-0-0-0
Matches
PV - CC 3CC - DC 6PV - DC 2
Health Index (PL)
PV: 6-0CC: 12-1DC: 9-0
1. family 10 2(R)
2. humour/fun 8 5(I)
3. integrity 7 5(I)
4. making a difference 7 6(S)
5. vision 7 7(I)
6. commitment 6 5(I)
Black Underline = PV & CC Orange = CC & DC P = Positive L = Potentially Limiting I = Individual O = Organizational
Orange = PV, CC & DC Blue = PV & DC (white circle) R = Relationship S = Societal
1. customer satisfaction 12 2(O)
2. humour/fun 10 5(O)
3. commitment 8 5(I)
4. making a difference 7 6(S)
5. balance (home/work) 6 4(O)
6. financial stability 6 1(O)
7. continuous improvement
5 4(O)
8. employee fulfilment 5 6(O)
9. innovation 5 4(I)
10. creativity 4 5(I)
11. hierarchy (L) 4 3(O)
12. organisational growth 4 1(O)
13. teamwork 4 4(R)
1. teamwork 11 4(R)
2. accountability 7 4(R)
3. continuous improvement
7 4(O)
4. humour/fun 7 5(O)
5. customer collaboration 6 6(O)
6. financial stability 6 1(O)
7. trust 6 5(R)
8. commitment 5 5(I)
9. employee fulfilment 5 6(O)
Values Plot Copyright 2010 Barrett Values Centre December 2010
42
SALAR Story - Christine
43
Measurement Matters
1998
The Barrett Model
44
Working with Whole the organisation
2006
Implementing Whole-System Change
45
Cultural Evolution – Whole System Change
PersonalityIndividual values and beliefs
CharacterIndividual behaviors
CultureGroup values and beliefs
Social StructuresGroup behaviors
Values Behaviors
Personal Alignment
Structural Alignment
Values Alignment
Mission Alignment
Individual
Collective
Fredrik Reinfeldt
Sweden
Thank you Ken Wilber
46
Organisational transformation starts
with the personal transformation of the
leaders
47
Seven Levels of Leadership
Wisdom/ Visionary
Mentor/ Partner
Integrator/ Inspirer
Facilitator/ Influencer
Manager/ Organiser
Relationship Manager
Crisis Director
SERVICE TO HUMANITYLong –term perspective. Future generations. Ethics.
COLLABORATION WITH CUSTOMERS AND LOCAL COMMUNITY
Strategic alliances. Employee fulfilment. Environmental stewardship.
DEVELOPMENT OF CORPORATE COMMUNITYPositive, creative corporate culture. Shared vision and values.
CONTINUOUS RENEWALPromotes learning and innovation. Team builder. Empowers
others.
BEING THE BEST, BEST PRACTICEProductivity. Efficiency. Quality. Systems and processes.
Bureaucracy. Complacency.
RELATIONSHIPS SUPPORTING CORPORATE NEEDSGood communication between employees, customers and
suppliers.Manipulation. Blame.
PURSUIT OF PROFIT & SHAREHOLDER VALUEAble to manage adversity. Directive. Willing to take
charge.Exploitation. Over-control.
Positive Focus/ Excessive Focus
48
The Leader and the Vision
The leader must be able to answer the questions
Who am I? Why am I here? What is my purpose? What is my vision?
If the leader cannot lead him/herself then how can they lead an organisation?
Who are we? Why are we here? What is our purpose? What is our vision?
49
What is holding you back from expanding your vision and contribution?
What qualities would you need to embrace to step into a larger role in the world?
CourageThe ability to overcome your fears … and do it anyhow.
50
Underlying Fears that Drive Deficiency Needs
Level 3 – I am not enoughI do not have enough power, authority or respect to satisfy my need for self-esteem
Level 1 – I don’t have enoughI do not have enough money, safety, protection, health, food, etc, to satisfy my need for survival
Level 2 – I am not loved enoughI do not have enough love, caring, attention, etc, to satisfy my need for belonging
51
Cultural Evolution Begins with Personal Evolution
The culture ofan organisationis a reflectionof the leadership consciousness.
power (L) 11 Level 3
blame (L) 10 Level 2
demanding (L) 10 Level 2
manipulative (L) 10 Level 2
experience 9 Level 3
controlling (L) 8 Level 1
arrogant (L) 7 Level 3
authoritarian (L) 6 Level 1
exploitative (L) 6 Level 1
ruthless (L) 6 Level 1
1. short-term focus (L) 13 Level 1
2. blame (L) 11 Level 2
3. manipulation (L) 10 Level 2
4. caution (L) 7 Level 1
5. cynicism (L) 7 Level 3
6. bureaucracy (L) 6 Level 3
7. control (L) 6 Level 1
8. cost reduction 5 Level 1
9. empire building (L) 5 Level 2
10. image (L) 5 Level 3
11. long hours (L) 5 Level 3
LV A Feedback 14 Assessors
PL = 1-9 | IRO (P) = 1-0-0 | IRO (L) = 1-8-0
CVA Current Culture
PL= 1-10 | IROS (P)= 0-0-1-0 | IROS (L)= 2-4-4-0
Cultural Entropy 38% Personal Entropy 64%
52
The culture ofan organisationis a reflectionof the leadership consciousness.
continuous learning 11 Level 4
generosity 11 Level 5
commitment 10 Level 5
positive attitude 10 Level 5
vision 10 Level 7
ambitious 9 Level 3
making a difference 8 Level 6
results orientation 8 Level 3
honesty 7 Level 5
integrity 7 Level 5
intuition 7 Level 6
leadership developer 7 Level 6
1. customer satisfaction 16 Level 2
2. commitment 11 Level 5
3. continuous learning 11 Level 4
4. making a difference 11 Level 6
5. global perspective 9 Level 3
6. mentoring 9 Level 6
7. enthusiasm 8 Level 5
8. leadership development 8 Level 6
9. integrity 7 Level 5
10. open communication 7 Level 2
11. optimism 7 Level 5
12. shared values 7 Level 5
CVA Current Culture
PL= 12-0 | IROS (P)= 4-2-5-1 | IROS (L)= 0-0-0-0
LV A Feedback 27 Assessors
PL = 12-0 | IRO (P) = 9-1-2 | IRO (L) = 0-0-0
Cultural Evolution Begins with Personal Evolution
Cultural Entropy 7% Personal Entropy 9%
53
2006
Democratising Leadership
54
Book dedication
Dedicated to My Mother
Gwendoline Olive Barrett
1910 - 2010
... and 15 Days
55
The New Leadership Paradigm
A Shift from “I” to “We”
Ultimately, the problems of existence that we collectively face are issues of personal consciousness, and the crisis we face is a crisis of leadership.
We will only get beyond this stage of our collective evolution if we can put aside our narrow self-interests, focus on the whole system, and build a values-driven framework of policies that support the common good.
56
From the Big Bang … to the Present Day
Stage 1Entities learn how to become viable and independent in their frameworks of existence.
Stage 2 As life conditions become more complex, viable independent entities bond with each other to create a group structures.
Stage 3 Viable independent group structures then cooperate with each other to form a higher order entity.
Energy Atoms Molecules Cells Organisms Creatures Homo sapiens
57
Stage 3 External Cohesion: Viable independent group structures then cooperate with each other to form a higher order entity.
Stage 1 Personal Mastery: An entity learns how to become viable and independent in its framework of existence.
Stage 2 Internal Cohesion: Viable independent entities then bond with each other to create a group structure.
Framework of Evolution & The Barrett Model
58
Leadership Development Learning System
The Book
The Web Site
The Journals and Workbooks
59
Full Spectrum Leadership (Self Assessment)
http://www.valuescentre.com/resources/?sec=exercises
60
National Values Assessments
61
Stages in the Development of National Consciousness
Global Global SustainabilityHuman Rights, Future Generations, Ecological Resilience.
External CohesionStrategic AlliancesRegional Collaboration, Environmental Awareness, Quality of Life .
Internal CohesionStrong National IdentityTrust, Openness, Transparency, Shared Vision and Values, Fairness.
TransformationDemocratic ProcessesEquality, Freedom of Speech, Consensus, Adaptability, Accountability.
Self-EsteemInstitutional EffectivenessRule of Law, National Pride, Governmental Efficiency
RelationshipSocial StabilityConflict Resolution, Racial Harmony, Rituals
SurvivalEconomic Stability Prosperity. Health, Defense, Social Safety Nets
Positive Focus /
7
6
5
4
3
2
1Corruption, Violence, Poverty, Greed.Corruption, Violence, Poverty, Greed.
Inequality, Discrimination, Intolerance. Inequality, Discrimination, Intolerance.
Bureaucracy, Central Control, Elitism. Bureaucracy, Central Control, Elitism.
Excessive FocusExcessive Focus
62
National/Regional Values Assessments
Denmark Latvia Sweden Canada
Iceland Bhutan USA Belgium
AustraliaUK North West) BrazilFinland
Spain (Extremadura) Macedonia (Skopje) Argentina Venezuela
63
National Values Assessments: Outcomes
Australia National Conversation: Corporations, Government NGOs and Citizens.
Latvia 2030: Sustainable development strategy based on the values of the people. Highest planning document in Latvian Government
Iceland National Assembly. 1300 citizens from voting register chosen to help government rebuild a values driven nation.
Belgium Assessment under the Protection of the Royal Family. Politicians and mayors engaged in the dialogue with people.
Sverige 2010+
SVERIGE 2010+
STUDIE OM SVERIGES KULTUR OCH VÄRDEGRUND
19 maj 2010
Sponsor av Sverige 2010+corporate missions ab
Förra året gjorde vi Sverige 2009+, nu har vi Sverige 2010+
http://www.preera.se/preera/sv/sverigestudien
66
Stories of social measurement and change from around the world – continually updated blog
To get a copy: http://bit.ly/eL9zQF
67
Survey Questions
1) Personal ValuesPlease select ten of the following values/behaviours that most reflect who you are, not who you desire to become.
2) Current National Culture ValuesPlease select ten of the following values/behaviours that most reflect how your society currently operates.
3) Desired National Culture ValuesPlease select ten of the following values/behaviours that you would most like to see reflected in your nation.
68
Cultural Entropy: Risk Bands
< 10% Prime: This a low level of entropy and augurs well for the future.
11%-20% Minor Issues: Some degree of dissatisfaction with the current culture that requires discussion and dialogue and could lead to potential unrest if left unresolved
21%-30% Significant Issues: Potential unease among the population and/or potential conflict situations that need to be addressed
31%-40% Serious Issues: Unresolved issues that, if left unaddressed, could lead to social unrest
41%-50% Critical Issues: Leadership issues that, if left unaddressed, could lead to a change in government
> 50% Culture in Crisis: Leadership issues that could lead to civil disobedience and social unrest. This indicates a need for a change in policy that could also be accompanied by a change in government
69
Argentina
Entropy ≈60%
2001
70
Argentina
Argentina financial crisis 2001
71
Denmark: Group (923) 2008
Level 7
Level 6
Level 5
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Personal Values Current Culture Values Desired Culture Values
PL= 10-0 | IRS (P)= 4-6-0 | IRS (L)= 0-0-0 PL= 7-3 | IROS (P)= 3-1-2-1 | IROS (L)= 1-0-2-0 PL= 10-0 | IROS (P)= 3-1-2-4 | IROS (L)= 0-0-0-0
Matches
PV - CC 0CC - DC 6PV - DC 0
1. family 450 Level 2
2. honesty 431 Level 5
3. humor/fun 400 Level 5
4. responsibility 381 Level 4
5. positive attitude 302 Level 5
6. friendship 291 Level 2
7. caring 284 Level 2
8. fairness 243 Level 5
9. listening 233 Level 2
10. cooperation 230 Level 5
Black Underline = PV & CC Orange = CC & DC P = Positive L = Potentially Limiting I = Individual O = Organizational
Orange = PV, CC & DC Blue = PV & DC (white circle) R = Relationship S = Societal
1. freedom of speech 471 Level 4
2. educational opportunities
437 Level 3
3. prosperity 356 Level 3
4. democratic process 344 Level 4
5. financial stability 322 Level 1
6. personal freedom 293 Level 4
7. human rights 263 Level 7
8. tradition (L) 256 Level 2
9. bureaucracy (L) 253 Level 3
10. materialistic (L) 232 Level 1
1. freedom of speech 356 Level 4
2. social responsibility 345 Level 4
3. educational opportunities
341 Level 3
4. human rights 306 Level 7
5. financial stability 300 Level 1
6. peace 289 Level 7
7. democratic process 272 Level 4
8. social justice 261 Level 4
9. personal freedom 249 Level 4
10. quality of life 233 Level 6
Values Plot Copyright 2008 Barrett Values Centre September 2008
Entropy 21%
72
Denmark
Denmark - Mohammed cartoon protests 2005 (freedom of speech)
73
Iceland
Entropy 54%
2008
74
Iceland
Iceland Economic Collapse 2008
75
Iceland National Assessment (1094) 2010
Level 7
Level 6
Level 5
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Personal Values Current Culture Values Desired Culture Values
IRS (P)= 5-5-0 | IRS (L)= 0-0-0 IROS (P)= 0-0-0-1 | IROS (L)= 2-3-4-0 IROS (P)= 2-3-4-1 | IROS (L)= 0-0-0-0
Matches
PV - CC 0CC - DC 0PV - DC 3
Health Index (PL)
PV: 10-0CC: 1-9
DC: 10-0
1. family 598 2(R)
2. honesty 497 5(I)
3. friendship 357 2(R)
4. positive attitude 335 5(I)
5. trust 298 5(R)
6. fairness 292 5(R)
7. health 273 1(I)
8. accountability 268 4(R)
9. financial stability 268 1(I)
10. responsibility 264 4(I)
Black Underline = PV & CC Orange = CC & DC P = Positive L = Potentially Limiting I = Individual O = Organizational
Orange = PV, CC & DC Blue = PV & DC (white circle) R = Relationship S = Societal
1. uncertainty about the future (L)
530 1(I)
2. corruption (L) 507 1(O)
3. unemployment (L) 495 1(O)
4. blame (L) 442 2(R)
5. concern for future generations
347 7(S)
6. poverty (L) 326 1(I)
7. short-term focus (L) 307 1(O)
8. elitism (L) 296 3(R)
9. conflict/aggression (L) 283 2(R)
10. wasted resources (L) 282 3(O)
1. honesty 295 5(I)
2. financial stability 267 1(I)
3. employment opportunities
259 1(O)
4. family 235 2(R)
5. respect 230 2(R)
6. dependable public services
228 3(O)
7. poverty reduction 228 1(O)
8. educational opportunities 220 3(O)
9. caring for the elderly 219 4(S)
10. democratic process 217 4(R)
Values Plot Copyright 2010 Barrett Values Centre September 2010
Entropy 63%
76
Iceland
Iceland National Assembly 2009/2010
1200 Citizens + 300 Government, NGOs & Institution Leaders + 500 Volunteers
Themes: Education, Economy, Equal rights, Family, Environment, Public administration, Welfare, Sustainability
77
USA National Assessment (1502)
Level 7
Level 6
Level 5
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Personal Values Current Culture Values Desired Culture Values
IRS (P)= 5-6-0 | IRS (L)= 0-0-0 IROS (P)= 0-0-0-0 | IROS (L)= 3-3-4-0 IROS (P)= 2-1-3-4 | IROS (L)= 0-0-0-0
Matches
PV - CC 0CC - DC 0PV - DC 1
Health Index (PL)
PV: 11-0CC: 0-10DC: 10-0
1. family 691 2(R)
2. caring 657 2(R)
3. honesty 576 5(I)
4. humor/fun 548 5(I)
5. compassion 469 7(R)
6. responsibility 461 4(I)
7. friendship 407 2(R)
8. respect 392 2(R)
9. accountability 388 4(R)
10. independence 359 4(I)
11. patience 359 5(I)
Black Underline = PV & CC Orange = CC & DC P = Positive L = Potentially Limiting I = Individual O = Organizational
Orange = PV, CC & DC Blue = PV & DC (white circle) R = Relationship S = Societal
1. corruption (L) 748 1(O)
2. blame (L) 681 2(R)
3. bureaucracy (L) 681 3(O)
4. crime/violence (L) 628 1(R)
5. uncertainty about the future (L)
567 1(I)
6. wasted resources (L) 552 3(O)
7. materialistic (L) 527 1(I)
8. unemployment (L) 466 1(O)
9. conflict/aggression (L) 426 2(R)
10. poverty (L) 358 1(I)
1. accountability 703 4(R)
2. concern for future generations
516 7(S)
3. employment opportunities
497 1(O)
4. caring for the elderly 467 4(S)
5. affordable housing 429 1(O)
6. peace 429 7(S)
7. caring for the disadvantaged
398 4(S)
8. financial stability 368 1(I)
9. quality of life 335 6(I)
10. poverty reduction 325 1(O)
Values Plot Copyright 2009 Barrett Values Centre January 2009
Entropy 52%
2009
78
USA National Assessment (1504) 2010
Level 7
Level 6
Level 5
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Personal Values Current Culture Values Desired Culture Values
IRS (P)= 4-6-0 | IRS (L)= 0-0-0 IROS (P)= 0-0-1-0 | IROS (L)= 2-3-4-0 IROS (P)= 1-1-4-4 | IROS (L)= 0-0-0-0
Matches
PV - CC 0CC - DC 0PV - DC 2
Health Index (PL)
PV: 10-0CC: 1-9
DC: 10-0
1. family 655 2(R)
2. caring 646 2(R)
3. honesty 610 5(I)
4. humor/fun 573 5(I)
5. responsibility 508 4(I)
6. accountability 485 4(R)
7. independence 435 4(I)
8. friendship 434 2(R)
9. compassion 427 7(R)
10. respect 379 2(R)
Black Underline = PV & CC Orange = CC & DC P = Positive L = Potentially Limiting I = Individual O = Organizational
Orange = PV, CC & DC Blue = PV & DC (white circle) R = Relationship S = Societal
1. bureaucracy (L) 761 3(O)
2. corruption (L) 727 1(O)
3. blame (L) 680 2(R)
4. uncertainty about the future (L)
651 1(I)
5. wasted resources (L) 647 3(O)
6. materialistic (L) 586 1(I)
7. crime/violence (L) 534 1(R)
8. unemployment (L) 510 1(O)
9. conflict/aggression (L) 437 2(R)
10. military strength 402 3(O)
1. accountability 826 4(R)
2. concern for future generations
567 7(S)
3. honesty 529 5(I)
4. employment opportunities
488 1(O)
5. caring for the elderly 457 4(S)
6. effective healthcare 435 1(O)
7. economic growth 398 1(O)
8. caring for the disadvantaged
395 4(S)
9. affordable housing 390 1(O)
10. peace 378 7(S)
Values Plot Copyright 2010 Barrett Values Centre January 2010
Entropy 58%
79
USA 2009
US Government forced to bail out banks and industry -2007 / 2008
80
Swedish National (1016) 2009
Level 7
Level 6
Level 5
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Personal Values Current Culture Values Desired Culture Values
IRS (P)= 5-5-0 | IRS (L)= 0-0-0 IROS (P)= 0-1-1-4 | IROS (L)= 1-0-3-0 IROS (P)= 2-0-3-5 | IROS (L)= 0-0-0-0
Matches
PV - CC 0CC - DC 4PV - DC 2
Health Index (PL)
PV: 10-0CC: 6-4
DC: 10-0
1. honesty 500 5(I)
2. humour/fun 486 5(I)
3. family 467 2(R)
4. responsibility 393 4(I)
5. accountability 342 4(R)
6. compassion 298 7(R)
7. positive attitude 292 5(I)
8. friendship 280 2(R)
9. independence 263 4(I)
10. fairness 252 5(R)
Black Underline = PV & CC Orange = CC & DC P = Positive L = Potentially Limiting I = Individual O = Organizational
Orange = PV, CC & DC Blue = PV & DC (white circle) R = Relationship S = Societal
1. freedom of speech 539 4(O)
2. peace 522 7(S)
3. bureaucracy (L) 429 3(O)
4. unemployment (L) 409 1(O)
5. human rights 344 7(S)
6. democratic process 317 4(R)
7. environmental awareness
311 6(S)
8. uncertainty about the future (L)
301 1(I)
9. wasted resources (L) 284 3(O)
10. nature conservancy 276 6(S)
1. employment opportunities
571 1(O)
2. financial stability 437 1(I)
3. concern for future generations
415 7(S)
4. nature conservancy 352 6(S)
5. honesty 334 5(I)
6. peace 307 7(S)
7. caring for the elderly 283 4(S)
8. environmental awareness
275 6(S)
9. freedom of speech 275 4(O)
10. fairness 254 5(O)
Values Plot Copyright 2009 Barrett Values Centre February 2009
Entropy 31%
Sverige 2010+ Personliga värderingar och samhällskultur
Level 7
Level 6
Level 5
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Personal Values Current Culture Values Desired Culture Values
IRS (P)= 5-5-0 | IRS (L)= 0-0-0 IROS (P)= 0-1-1-3 | IROS (L)= 1-1-3-0 IROS (P)= 3-0-2-5 | IROS (L)= 0-0-0-0
Matches
PV - CC 0CC - DC 1PV - DC 2
Health Index (PL)
PV: 10-0CC: 5-5
DC: 10-0
1. ärlighet 501 5(I)
2. familj 452 2(R)
3. humor/glädje 437 5(I)
4. ansvar 380 4(I)
5. medkänsla 326 7(R)
6. tar ansvar 318 4(R)
7. självständig 268 4(I)
8. positiv attityd 265 5(I)
9. rättvisa 247 5(R)
10. respekt 243 2(R)
Black Underline = PV & CC Orange = CC & DC P = Positive L = Potentially Limiting I = Individual O = Organisational
Orange = PV, CC & DC Blue = PV & DC (white circle) R = Relationship S = Societal
1. yttrandefrihet 458 4(O)
2. byråkrati (L) 448 3(O)
3. arbetslöshet (L) 424 1(O)
4. fred 398 7(S)
5. resursslöseri (L) 314 3(O)
6. miljömedvetenhet 303 6(S)
7. demokratiska processer 298 4(R)
8. skyller på varandra (L) 297 2(R)
9. mänskliga rättigheter 281 7(S)
10. ovisshet omframtiden (L)
280 1(I)
1. arbetstillfällen 568 1(O)
2. ekonomisk stabilitet 423 1(I)
3. ansvar för kommande generationer
380 7(S)
4. ärlighet 314 5(I)
5. bevara naturen 297 6(S)
6. omsorg om de äldre 296 4(S)
7. omsorg om de utsatta 245 4(S)
8. livskvalitet 239 6(I)
9. rättvisa 233 5(O)
10. fred 229 7(S)
Values Plot Copyright 2010 Barrett Values Centre March 2010
Entropy 34%
82
Swedish National (1002) 2010
Level 7
Level 6
Level 5
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Personal Values Current Culture Values Desired Culture Values
IRS (P)= 5-5-0 | IRS (L)= 0-0-0 IROS (P)= 0-1-1-3 | IROS (L)= 1-1-3-0 IROS (P)= 3-0-2-5 | IROS (L)= 0-0-0-0
Matches
PV - CC 0CC - DC 1PV - DC 2
Health Index (PL)
PV: 10-0CC: 5-5
DC: 10-0
1. honesty 501 5(I)
2. family 452 2(R)
3. humour/fun 437 5(I)
4. responsibility 380 4(I)
5. compassion 326 7(R)
6. accountability 318 4(R)
7. independence 268 4(I)
8. positive attitude 265 5(I)
9. fairness 247 5(R)
10. respect 243 2(R)
Black Underline = PV & CC Orange = CC & DC P = Positive L = Potentially Limiting I = Individual O = Organizational
Orange = PV, CC & DC Blue = PV & DC (white circle) R = Relationship S = Societal
1. freedom of speech 458 4(O)
2. bureaucracy (L) 448 3(O)
3. unemployment (L) 424 1(O)
4. peace 398 7(S)
5. wasted resources (L) 314 3(O)
6. environmental awareness
303 6(S)
7. democratic process 298 4(R)
8. blame (L) 297 2(R)
9. human rights 281 7(S)
10. uncertainty about the future (L)
280 1(I)
1. employment opportunities 568 1(O)
2. financial stability 423 1(I)
3. concern for future generations
380 7(S)
4. honesty 314 5(I)
5. nature conservancy 297 6(S)
6. caring for the elderly 296 4(S)
7. caring for the disadvantaged
245 4(S)
8. quality of life 239 6(I)
9. fairness 233 5(O)
10. peace 229 7(S)
Values Plot Copyright 2010 Barrett Values Centre March 2010
Entropy 34%
83
Canadian National Assessment: Group (1250) 2009
Level 7
Level 6
Level 5
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Personal Values Current Culture Values Desired Culture Values
IRS (P)= 5-5-0 | IRS (L)= 0-0-0 IROS (P)= 1-0-2-1 | IROS (L)= 1-1-4-0 IROS (P)= 0-1-5-4 | IROS (L)= 0-0-0-0
Matches
PV - CC 0CC - DC 1PV - DC 0
Health Index (PL)
PV: 10-0CC: 4-6
DC: 10-0
1. honesty 577 5(I)
2. family 481 2(R)
3. caring 436 2(R)
4. humor/fun 427 5(I)
5. respect 371 2(R)
6. friendship 360 2(R)
7. responsibility 353 4(I)
8. positive attitude 324 5(I)
9. trust 322 5(R)
10. patience 313 5(I)
Black Underline = PV & CC Orange = CC & DC P = Positive L = Potentially Limiting I = Individual O = Organizational
Orange = PV, CC & DC Blue = PV & DC (white circle) R = Relationship S = Societal
1. bureaucracy (L) 471 3(O)
2. human rights 444 7(S)
3. freedom of speech 375 4(O)
4. wasted resources (L) 371 3(O)
5. unemployment (L) 304 1(O)
6. crime/violence (L) 299 1(R)
7. law enforcement 284 3(O)
8. corruption (L) 274 1(O)
9. uncertainty about the future (L)
272 1(I)
10. quality of life 259 6(I)
1. accountability 511 4(R)
2. caring for the elderly 461 4(S)
3. affordable housing 450 1(O)
4. effective healthcare 400 1(O)
5. caring for the disadvantaged
377 4(S)
6. concern for future generations
356 7(S)
7. poverty reduction 342 1(O)
8. employment opportunities 337 1(O)
9. human rights 320 7(S)
10. governmental effectiveness
317 3(O)
Values Plot Copyright 2009 Barrett Values Centre May 2009
Entropy 32%
84
Bhutan: Group (403) 2007
Level 7
Level 6
Level 5
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Personal Values Current Culture Values Desired Culture Values
IRS (P)= 4-4-1 | IRS (L)= 1-0-0 IROS (P)= 1-0-8-2 | IROS (L)= 0-0-0-0 IROS (P)= 1-1-7-1 | IROS (L)= 0-0-0-0
Matches
PV - CC 1CC - DC 6PV - DC 2
Health Index (PL)
PV: 9-1CC: 11-0DC: 10-0
1. friendship 180 2(R)
2. continuous learning 160 4(I)
3. compassion 128 7(R)
4. caution (L) 122 1(I)
5. sincerity 121 5(I)
6. social justice 118 7(S)
7. self-discipline 102 1(I)
8. optimism 95 5(I)
9. helpfulness 94 2(R)
10. caring 92 2(R)
Black Underline = PV & CC Orange = CC & DC P = Positive L = Potentially Limiting I = Individual O = Organizational
Orange = PV, CC & DC Blue = PV & DC (white circle) R = Relationship S = Societal
1. continuous improvement 195 4(O)
2. environmental protection
104 1(O)
3. strict moral/religious codes
104 3(O)
4. political rights 102 3(O)
5. education 100 4(O)
6. nature conservancy 91 6(S)
7. shared vision 90 5(O)
8. information availability 88 3(O)
9. shared values 88 5(O)
10. contentment 87 5(I)
11. social justice 87 4(S)
1. education 115 4(O)
2. continuous improvement 113 4(O)
3. freedom of speech 113 4(O)
4. economic growth 107 1(O)
5. social justice 100 4(S)
6. contentment 93 5(I)
7. environmental protection 89 1(O)
8. compassion 83 7(R)
9. full employment 82 3(O)
10. strict moral/religious codes
82 3(O)
Values Plot Copyright 2009 Barrett Values Centre January 2009
Entropy 4%
85
Bhutan
Bhutan prioritise *GNH above GDP(*Gross National Happiness)
86
Finland National Assessment (1008) 2010
Level 7
Level 6
Level 5
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Personal Values Current Culture Values Desired Culture Values
IRS (P)= 6-5-0 | IRS (L)= 0-0-0 IROS (P)= 0-1-2-1 | IROS (L)= 2-0-4-0 IROS (P)= 3-1-4-2 | IROS (L)= 0-0-0-0
Matches
PV - CC 0CC - DC 2PV - DC 1
Health Index (PL)
PV: 11-0CC: 4-6
DC: 10-0
1. honesty 431 5(I)
2. caring 418 2(R)
3. family 387 2(R)
4. humour/fun 347 5(I)
5. accountability 334 4(R)
6. friendship 286 2(R)
7. openness 266 5(R)
8. practicality 261 3(I)
9. positive attitude 243 5(I)
10. authenticity 239 5(I)
11. independence 239 4(I)
Black Underline = PV & CC Orange = CC & DC P = Positive L = Potentially Limiting I = Individual O = Organizational
Orange = PV, CC & DC Blue = PV & DC (white circle) R = Relationship S = Societal
1. bureaucracy (L) 565 3(O)
2. unemployment (L) 431 1(O)
3. uncertainty about the future (L)
416 1(I)
4. educational opportunities
405 3(O)
5. wasted resources (L) 371 3(O)
6. short-term focus (L) 353 1(O)
7. freedom of speech 335 4(O)
8. peace 324 7(S)
9. envy (L) 298 2(I)
10. democratic process 293 4(R)
1. democratic process 449 4(R)
2. poverty reduction 371 1(O)
3. caring for the elderly 363 4(S)
4. quality of life 360 6(I)
5. authenticity 293 5(I)
6. affordable housing 291 1(O)
7. human rights 284 7(S)
8. dependable public services
282 3(O)
9. educational opportunities
262 3(O)
10. financial stability 262 1(I)
Values Plot Copyright 2010 Barrett Values Centre November 2010
Entropy 48%
87
Entropy Percentages by Nation
7263 60 58 54 53 51 48
43 42 3934 32
21
40
1020304050607080
Vene
zuel
a
Icel
and
Arge
ntina
USA
Latv
ia
Belg
ium
Braz
il
Finl
and
UK
(NW
)
Aust
ralia
Spai
n …
Swed
en
Cana
da
Den
mar
k
Bhut
an
Cultural entropy is a measure of dysfunction or toxic energy in a system
88
The Economic Meltdown
What we are currently experiencing is not a market shakeout or a technology shift.
It is the breakdown of an unsustainable economic paradigm that threatens the global
sustainability of human society.
The problems of existence have become global while the systems and processes we have for
dealing with them are national.
Richard Barrett
89
Estimated Cost of Entropy – National GDP
GDP$US,000
Cultural Entropy
Estimated cost to the national
economy $US,000
USA 14,200,000,000 58% 19,609,000,000
UK 2,650,000,000 43% 1,999,000,000
Canada 1,400,000,000 32% 658,000,000
Belgium 498,000,000 53% 561,000,000
Sweden 454,000,000 31% 216,000,000
Venezuela 314,000,000 72% 807,000,000
Denmark 312,000,000 21% 83,000,000
Finland 238,000,000 48% 219,000,000
Latvia 27,000,000 54% 32,000,000
Iceland 20,000,000 54% 24,000,000
Bhutan 1,197,000 4% 50,000
NB. Initial estimates based on calculation methods used for organisations. More research being done in this area.
90
Values Based Education – Prof Terry Lovat
• Improved student-teacher relationships
• Improved student & teacher wellbeing
• Calmer environment with less conflict
• Higher student self-belief and self-esteem
• Rise in levels of politeness and courtesy,
open friendliness, better manners, offers of
help, and students being more kind and
considerate
• Oh and by the way - Greater student
academic diligence
The purpose of our lives is to be happy Dalai
Lama
Happiness is the extent to which you live in love, as opposed to living in fear. Phil
Clothier
92
To Get More Information – Phil Clothier
For this presentation:
o http://www.slideshare.net/BarrettValues
For Stories of Social Measurement and Change:
o http://www.bit.ly/eL9zQF
For information on Barrett Values Centre:
o http://www.valuescentre.com
For the New Leadership Paradigm Learning System:
o http://www.newleadershipparadigm.com
For the On-line Values Journal:
o http://www.valuesjournal.com
For my Blog:
o http://philclothier.posterous.com/
For Twitter:
o http://www.twitter.com/philclothier