18
Bringing rigour to planning and evaluation in UK Government communications Stephen Hardwick Director of Corporate Communications HM Revenue and Customs, UK

Stephen Hardwick: Slik rettferdiggjør den britiske skattemyndigheten sitt millionbudsjett

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Bringing rigour to planning and

evaluation in UK Government

communications

Stephen Hardwick

Director of Corporate Communications

HM Revenue and Customs, UK

Scale of UK Government communications

• 4,000 communications people

• 17 Central Departments

• 330 public agencies

• £150 million annual salary costs

• £300 million annual marketing costs

Why measurement is important

“Half the money I spend on

advertising is wasted. The trouble

is: I don’t know which half.”

John Wanamaker

Inventor of mass retailing in the USA

Pressures in the tax department

• Data and evidence are at the core of my Department

• Pressure to cut budgets

• Pressure to cut staff

• Pressure to prove the value of communications

Measuring the wrong things

• Number of press releases issued

• Newspaper column inches and broadcast minutes

• Number of Twitter followers

• Twitter ‘Opportunities to see’

• Recall awareness of advertising

• Internal hits on intranet stories

• The policy or business objective

– must be SMART

• The policy or business outcome

The real things that needed measuring

Measuring hard business objectives

The Self Assessment campaign business objectives:

• the number of people who complete their returns on time • people will owe tax and it is expensive to chase them

• the proportion of people who file online • it is cheaper to process digital returns than paper returns

• and the number of people who call our helplines • it costs £5 per call; less demand = faster performance

Campaigns framework

udience insight A

bjectives – policy/business O

trategy S

mplementation I

coring/evaluation S

Mandatory evaluation project

• Four key deliverables:

Evaluation

frameworks and

dashboards

Improved

evaluation

capability

Mandatory

evaluation

training

Centre of

Excellence

to promote

best practice

Performance framework and dashboards

• Three tiers:

• Must have

• Should have

• Nice to have

• Four elements

• Press and media

• Reputation

• Campaigns and marketing

• Employee engagement

Nice to have

Should have

Must

have

Improved evaluation capability

• Evaluation competency framework

• Three tier training course

• Foundation – e-learning

• Practitioner – face-to-face training

• Advanced – masterclasses

• Network of Evaluation Champions in every Department

• Evaluation Council to advise on best practice and challenge

New evaluation framework

Inputs

What you do before and

during the activity (e.g):

• Planning

• Preparation

• Pre-testing

• Production

Outputs

What is delivered/target

audience reached (i.e.):

• Distribution

• Exposure

• Reach

Outtakes

What the target

audience think, feel or

do to make a decision

(i.e.):

• Awareness

• Understanding

• Interest

• Engagement

• Preference

• Support

Outcomes

The result of your

activity on the target

audience (e.g):

• Impact

• Influence

• Effects:

– Attitude

– Behaviour

Organisational

Impact

The quantifiable impact

on the organisation

goals/ KPIs (e.g):

• Revenue

• Costs reduction

• Complying actions

• (attitude/behaviour

change)

• Retention

• Reputation

Communication

Objectives

Organisational/

Policy Objectives

New evaluation framework

Inputs

• OASIS Key steps (e.g. planning, baseline, benchmarks)

• Costs (e.g. Staff, Agencies)

• Content creation (e.g. Briefs, statements, rebuttals, speeches)

• Media events/briefings organised

• Pre-engagement activities (e.g. journalist, media outlets)

Outputs

• Target audience reach

• Key message penetration

• No. of articles or broadcasts (Proactive and reactive)

• Media events successfully delivered/Attendance

• Share of voice (if operating in a competitive environment)

Outtakes

• Awareness of issue

• Sentiment

• Audience engagement (e.g. enquiry calls, click-throughs, shares, likes, retweets, downloads)

• Responses/Feedback (e.g. comments, letters)

• Net favourability rating

Quick guide – media measurement

Outcomes

• Advocacy (e.g. recommendations, endorsements, ambassadors, supportive quotes, subversions)

• Attitude change

• Behaviour change (e.g. complying actions)

• ROI or BCR

Organisational Impact

• Contribution to Organisation Goals/KPIs:

– Behavioural (e.g. complying actions improvement*)

– Attitudinal (e.g. perception levels)

– Experiential (e.g. customer experience)

– Financial (e.g. increase revenue or cost reduction)

– Reputation (e.g. RepTrak suvey, public polling)

*NB: Examples: taxes paid; blood donated; reduced drink-drive cases, more health screening, etc.

Quick guide – media measurement

Where we are

• We have a strong evaluation framework

• Measurement and evaluation are now mainstream and mandatory

• We focus on SMART business objectives and outcomes

• We have evaluation training and knowledge sharing

• We have embedded best practice

• We have a peer review of experts in an Evaluation Council

• We can demonstrate our value to Government with evidence.

Questions?

gcs.civilservice.gov.uk