-
6578
M
:
82036 -
08abatjoM
:
88
ohay@80
8
moc.oo
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 1
:
-1
-2
-3
ADN -4
ASR - 1-4 ADI - 2-4 AHR - 3-4
PSN ( ) -5
372 ameF -1-5 063 - 2-5 - 3-5 - 4-5
APM -6
- 1-6 - 2-6 APM devorpmI - 2-1-6 APM evitpadA -2- 2-6 -3-
2-6
-7
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 2
- 1
.
.
.
1
. . .
.
.
ngiseD cimsieS esaB ecnamrofreP- 1
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 3
-2
.
.
2 .
.
( )
.
-P -P .
.
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 4
: (
.
.
:
-1 -2
.
. .
.
.
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 5
. .
AGP .
: (
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
: 1
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 6
. . 2
: -
.
.
.
.
.
. 6 3
.
.
, , ,
CQC SSRS .
,
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 7
:
. )
( y x .
.
.
: -
) . (
.
( )
.
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 8
.
.
- 3
.
.
.
)
( .
. .
. b a
.
-
www
oc.808ezaS.w
88 9
mo
63
.
06
(
)
808
.
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 01
2ADN - 4
:
; (
:
)ADI( - AHR -
.
( ) (
(
3ASR - 1-4
.
. ( )
sisylanA cimanyD raenilnoN- 2 sisylanA murtceS esnopseR - 3
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 11
. .
.
4 ADI -2 -4
.
.
.
)revohsup cimanyd( ADI
tcurtS omsieS seesnepO
sisylanA cimanyD latnemercnI -4
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 21
5AHR - 3-4
.
.
.
.
.
.
. 3
. 7 .
sisylanA yrotsiH esnopseR -5
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 31
)AHR(
)PSN( . 372-ameF ( )
) ... (
.
.
.
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 41
6( ) - 5
.
.
. ...
.
.
.
.
.( )
.
. .
sisylanA revOhsuP citatS raenilnoN-PSN ro sisylanA revOhsuP-AOP
6
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 51
-
( )
.
:
.
.
:
.
. :
. -1 . - 2
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 61
.
.
. ( )
.
:
-
372ameF ) .
( -
. . .
- .
) 063 - (
% 2
.
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 71
:
:
-1
653 AMEF 044 AMEF
: .
-2
044 AMEF 04CTA
) (. )
( ) ( .
.
:
.
-
www
oc.808ezaS.w
88 81
mo
p ecnamrofreP
tniop
808
-3
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 91
372 ameF - 1-5
ameF - PSN .
. .
.
.
. 372 ameF
: 372-ameF
jSjm: -1*
(1,2....., jn )
( 9 )
:)FLE( -2k j jh * Shjm jj
T 12.5ces kT 1 2,0.5ces 1 k .
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 02
kS: SSRS -3
. ASR
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 12
063 - 2-5 .
:
.
. .
: ( 063) 1-
.
. 01-3 1-1
% 57 . .
1-2- . % 57
1-3 % 09
.
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 22
-2 .
. - 1-2 2-2
.
. 5.1
. 8-2-3
: 2 1
% 57 3
.
Y X lcca
( 1) . hsuP daoL
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 32
. 063 653ameF
. K 5.0
3-01 .
5.2 .
2 K K 5.2 5.0 .
. (063 ).
:
.
daoL resU
.
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 42
.
daoL . ddA edoM nrettaP
.
% 09
resU ) )nrettaP daoL( )daoL
.
. ) 3 9 33 54
%( 09 30.0 90.0 33.0 54.0
)sisylanA ladoM(
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 52
:
4.0 laixA gniH
3M
. 3 3M-2M-P
-
www
AHR
oc.808ezaS.w
88 62
A
.
.
.
mo
.
:
.
(
)
.
.
.
. ) (
.
808
-3-5
AHR
-
-
-
-
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 72
-4-5
:
.
revohsuP . 372ameF
.
(
. .
( )
.
(
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 82
1002 " " .
.
) . . (
8 - 6
.
. .
.
.
. SSRS
leoG & arpohC- 7 sisylanA revOhsoP ladoM-APM 8
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 92
. : . ASR
. - . -
or SSRS
. . ASR
APM
.
:
. n nw -1
Sn* Vu nbnr () n -2 * sm nn .
-3
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 03
/ FLD nsnn -4 n nD -5
uD onrnnrn n uonr -6 ) -7 . (
. 7 3 -8 .
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 13
SSRS -9 .
.
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 23
-1-6
- ASR APM .
APM
.
]6-1[ - . AHR APM
. AHR
( )
. -
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 33
.
n -
n n m Sm nn nD
nw ) n
nD . n n
. )APM( SSRS ASR APM -
.
- .
.
sisylanA revohsuP
.
CQC .
ASR
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 43
-
.
-2-6
APM - AOP
. -
. -
.
9 - 2-1-6
8002 ]52[
.
3 AOP .
AOP (APM )
sisylanA revOhsuP ladoM devorpmI- 9
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 53
.
]52[ .
. .
01 -2-2-6
.
[82] . evitpadA
. ]82[
.
sisylanA revOhsuP ladoM evitpadA- 01
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 63
-3-2-4
APM .
]72[ . .
0102 ]92[
-
808 moc.808ezaS.www
88 73
. - -
FODSE -
FODSE - - . -
.
-
808 www.Saze808.com
38 88
7-
1 - 360 2 - - 361 3 - - 363
[] Chopra AK, Goel RK. A modal pushover analysis procedure to
estimate seismic demands for buildings: Theory and preliminary
evaluation. Report No. PEER 2001/03. Berkeley (CA): Pacific
Earthquake Engineering Research Center. University of California;
2001. [] Chopra AK, Goel RK. A modal pushover analysis procedure
for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn
2002;31(3):561_82. [] Chopra AK, Goel RK, Chintanapakdee C.
Evaluation of a modified MPA procedure assuming higher modes as
elastic to estimate seismic demands. Earthq Spectra
2004;20(3):757_78. [] Chopra AK, Goel RK. A modal pushover analysis
procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan
buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2004;33(8): 903_27. [] Chopra AK,
Goel RK. Role of higher-mode pushover analyses in seismic analysis
of buildings. Earthq Spectra 2005;21(4):1027_41. [] Jan TS, Liu MW,
Kao YC. An upper-bound pushover analysis procedure for estimating
the seismic demands of high-rise buildings. Eng Struct 2003;26(1):
[10] Poursha M, Khoshnoudian F, Moghadam AS. A consecutive modal
pushover procedure for estimating the seismic demands of tall
buildings. Eng Struct 2009;31(2):591_9. [11] Hernandez-Montes E,
Kwon OS, Aschheim MA. An energy based formulation for first and
multiple-mode nonlinear static (Pushover) analyses. J Earthq Eng
2004;8(1):69_88. [12] Tjhin T, Aschheim M, Hernandez-Montes E.
Observations on the reliability of alternative multiple-mode
pushover analysis methods. [13] Gupta B, Kunnath SK. Adaptive
spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of
structures. Earthq Spectra 2000;16(2):367_91. [14] Kalkan E,
Kunnath SK. Adaptive modal combination for nonlinear static
analysis of building structures. J Struct Eng 2006;132(11):1721_31.
[15] Park HG, Eom T, Lee H. Factored modal combination for
evaluation of earthquake load profiles. J Struct Eng
2007;133(7):956_68. [16] Shakeri K, Shayanfar MA, Kabeyasawa T. A
story shear-based adaptive pushover procedure for estimating
seismic demands of buildings. Eng Struct 2010;32(1):174_83. [17]
Antoniou S, Pinho R. Advantages and limitations of adaptive and
non-adaptive force based pushover analysis. J Earthq Eng
2004;8(4):497_522. [18] Antoniou S, Pinho R. Development and
verification of a displacement-based
-
808 www.Saze808.com
39 88
adaptive pushover procedure. J Earthq Eng 2004;8(5):643_61. [19]
Pinho R, Monteiro R, Casarotti C, Delgado R. Assessment of
continuous span bridges through nonlinear static procedures. Earthq
Spectra 2009;25(1): 143_59. [20] Pinho R, Marques M, Monteiro R,
Casarotti C. Using the adaptive capacity spectrum method for
seismic assessment of irregular frames. In: Proceedings of the 5th
European workshop on the seismic behaviour of irregular and complex
structures. Paper No. 21. Catania (Italy); 2008. [21] Leelataviwat
S, Saewon W, Goel SC. Application of energy balance concept in
seismic evaluation of structures. J Struct Eng 2009;135(2):113_21.
[22] Leelataviwat S, Saewon W, Goel SC. An energy based method for
seismic evaluation of structures. In: Proceedings of 14th world
conference on earthquake engineering. Paper No. 05-01-0037; 2008.
[23] Villaverde R. Methods to assess the seismic collapse capacity
of building structures: State of the art. Struct Eng
2007;133(1):57_66. [24] Kotanidis C, Doudoumis IN. Energy based
approach of static pushover analysis. [25] Zhai Changhai, Mao
Jianmeng, and Xie Lili1 , An improved modal pushover analysis
procedure for estimating seismic demands of structures , 2008 [26]
Shakeri, K. Shayanfar, M.A. and Moghadam, A.S. (2007) "An efficient
method for optimum combination of modes required for pushover
analysis", Proceedings of the Ninth Canadian Conference on
Earthquake Engineering. [27] Hernandez-Montes, E. Kwon, O. S. and
Aschheim, M.A. (2004) "An energy-based formulation for first-and
multiple-mode nonlinear static (Pushover) analyses", Journal of
Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 8, pp. 69-88. [28] Gupta, B. and
Kunnath, S.K. (2000) "Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for
seismic evaluation of structures", Earthquake Spectra, [29] Yi
Jiang, Gang Li _, Dixiong Yang , A modified approach of energy
balance
concept based multimode pushover analysis to estimate seismic
demands for [] Applied Technology Council. Seismic evaluation and
retrofit of concrete buildings. Report ATC-40. Redwood City (CA);
1996. [] Federal Emergence Management Agency. NEHRP guidelines for
the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Report FEMA-273.
Washington (DC); 1997. [] Federal Emergence Management Agency.
Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of
buildings. Report FEMA-356. Washington [] Federal Emergence
Management Agency. Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis
procedure. Report FEMA-440. Washington (DC); 2005. [] Federal
Emergence Management Agency. Next-generation performancebased
seismic design guidelines. Report FEMA-445, Washington (DC);
2006.
35- 88 36- 88
