Upload
mythee
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/8/2019 136032
1/34
BS 8901:2007
Specification for asustainable eventmanagement system with
guidance for useICS 03.100.99
NO COPYING WITHOUT BSI PERMISSION EXCEPT AS PERMITTED BY COPYRIGHT LAW
BRITISH STANDARD
8/8/2019 136032
2/34
Printed on paper originating from well-managed forests
and other controlled sources
Publishing and copyright information
The BSI copyright notice displayed in this document indicates when the
document was last issued.
BSI 2007
ISBN 978 0 580 56618 9
The following BSI references relate to the work on this standard:
Committee reference SDS/1
Draft for comment 07/30146790 DC
Publication history
First published November 2007
Amendments issued since publication
Amd. no. Date Text affected
BS 8901:2007
8/8/2019 136032
3/34
BSI 2007 i
BS 8901:2007
ContentsForeword iii
0 Introduction 1
1 Scope 3
2 Normative references 3
3 Terms and definitions 3
4 Claiming compliance with this standard 4
5 Phase 1 5
6 Organizational commitment to sustainable development 5
7 Planning 6
8 Finalize objectives, and set key performance indicators
and targets 7
9 Phase 2 Implementation 11
10 Phase 3 13
11 Assessing performance 14
12 Review 15
13 Follow up 15
Annexes
Annex A (informative) Guidance for use of this specification 16
Annex B (informative) Principles to be applied to supply chain
management 20
Bibliography 27
List of figures
Figure 1 Road map for implementation of BS 8901 2
List of tables
Table 1 Examples of potential sustainability issues in event
management 8
Table A.1 Examples of activities in event management 16
Table A.2 Outline structure for a sustainable development maturity
matrix Guidelines for continual improvement 19
Table B.1 Sustainable procurement checklist 21
Summary of pages
This document comprises a front cover, an inside front cover,
pages i to iv, pages 1 to 27 and a back cover.
8/8/2019 136032
4/34
BS 8901:2007
ii BSI 2007 This page deliberately left blank
8/8/2019 136032
5/34
BSI 2007 iii
BS 8901:2007
Foreword
Publishing information
This British Standard was published by BSI and came into effect
on 30 November 2007. It was prepared by Technical Committee SDS/1,
Sustainable development. A list of organizations represented on thiscommittee can be obtained on request to its secretary.
Information about this document
This standard has been drafted to help the events industry conduct
business operations in a more sustainable manner.
Relationship with other publications
This standard is the first in a series of daughter standards of BS 8900,
Guidance for managing sustainable development.
As a derivative of BS 8900, this standard has been written in such a
way as to reflect the spirit of BS 8900. Consequently the principlesdescribed in the standard are designed to be compatible with BS 8900.
However, whereas BS 8900 has the broadest application to
organizations (and individuals) and is independent of the nature
of their activities, this standard focuses more specifically on
organizations in the event industry. This standard also shares
common management system principles and processes with
the ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 series.
The following table shows the commonality between BS 8900, BS 8901,
BS EN ISO 9001 and BS EN ISO 14001.
There is an important distinction between this standard and BS 8900.
BS 8900 takes the form of guidance and recommendation but is not aspecification to which compliance can be claimed (nor around which
a certification scheme can be established) whereas, compliance
to BS 8901 can be claimed by any organization that is involved in the
delivery of event(s) subject to defining the organizations role and scope
of activities in the delivery of event(s); and an evidence-based approach
demonstrating that either:
a) the requirements of the management system have been met; or
b) the requirements of the contracting organization with overall
responsibility for sustainable event management have been met.
Standard Application Topic Design element Standard type
BS 8900 General Sustainability Sustainabledevelopment
Guide
BS 8901 Events only Sustainability Sustainabledevelopment
Management systemspecification
BS EN ISO 9001 General Quality Customer satisfaction Management systemspecification
BS EN ISO 14001 General Environment Environmental impact Management system
specification
8/8/2019 136032
6/34
BS 8901:2007
iv BSI 2007
Presentational conventions
The provisions of this standard are presented in roman (i.e. upright)
type. Its requirements are expressed in sentences in which the principal
auxiliary verb is shall.
Commentary, explanation and general informative material is
presented in smaller italic type, and does not constitute anormative element.
Contractual and legal considerations
This publication does not purport to include all the necessary provisions
of a contract. Users are responsible for its correct application.
Compliance with a British Standard cannot confer immunity
from legal obligations.
8/8/2019 136032
7/34
BSI 2007 1
BS 8901:2007
0 Introduction
0.1 General
BS 8901 is a daughter standard of BS 8900, which defines sustainable
development as:an enduring, balanced approach to economic activity,
environmental responsibility and social progress.
Sustainability impacts often fall outside of the scope of existing
management systems, so this standard has been drafted to help
individuals and organizations involved in the events industry to
implement a sustainable event management system.
The key characteristics that influence the success of the sustainable
event management system are:
it should be an integral part of the event management process,
and not regarded as an add-on component; and its influence should extend throughout the entire supply chain.
0.2 Applicability
This standard applies to the events management system used by
individuals or organizations within the event industry. It is applicable to
the systems used for both one-off and regular events.
It applies to and can be used by an organization responsible for the
overall management and co-ordination of the event, or by a supplier.
The requirements of the standard that apply to any given organization
or event are a matter of informed judgement.
This standard applies to the full diversity of events, recognizing that the
issues and activities associated with events of varying nature and scale
might differ substantially. It applies to all event management
stakeholders, and isproportional;taking into account an organization
or individuals role and position in the supply chain, its size, capacity to
adopt the system and ability to implement it.
Supplier organizations can comply with this standard within their own
individual sphere of control, whether the organization responsible for
the overall management and co-ordination of the event complies or not.
0.3 Implementation
Following the steps in Clauses 5 to 13 will encourage continuous
improvement of the quality of the management system and
sustainability performance. Figure 1 provides a road map for
implementing this standard.
8/8/2019 136032
8/34
BS 8901:2007
2 BSI 2007
The key is to produce a flexible framework which allows for all the
dimensions of sustainability and actively encourages and recognizes
learning and continual improvement.
A maturity matrix is provided in Table A.2 to map progression in terms
of the application of sustainable development principles and to track
progress through successive event cycles. (See also Clause 13.)
Figure 1 Road map for implementation of BS 8901
Decision to
stage event
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
PHASE 3
Define policy for sustainability (Clause 6)
Identify and engage stakeholders(including supply chain) as part of the
planning process (Clause 7)
Finalize objectives, and set key performanceindicators and targets (Clause 8)
Check: monitor and evaluateagainst KPIs (Clause 11)
Review (Clause 12) and feedforward (Clause 13)
Implement (Clause 9): provide resourcesand competencies, manage the supply chain
and maintain communications, documentthe system
8/8/2019 136032
9/34
BSI 2007 3
BS 8901:2007
1 ScopeThis standard specifies requirements for a sustainable event
management system and guidance on meeting those requirements.
That is, the guidance provides additional practical information to
support implementation.
This standard is applicable to all event organizations (including
individuals), regardless of their role or responsibility in event(s), or
whether or not their core business is event management. This standard
is applicable to clients (responsible for commissioning an event),
organizers (the organization, or partner organizations, responsible for
event organization), and other suppliers.
The specification is designed to be capable of addressing sustainability
management of events through the entire event life cycle to include the
phases from conception and planning through to implementation and
final review, or restricted to certain phases only.
NOTE Requirements for claims of compliance with this standard aregiven in Clause4.
2 Normative referencesThe following referenced documents are indispensable for the
application of this document. For dated references, only the edition
cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the
referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
NOTE There are no normative references in this standard. Informative
references are given in the bibliography.
3 Terms and definitionsFor the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions
apply.
3.1 event clientorganization that commissions an event
3.2 event management life cycle
event cyclestages and activities of an event, from conception through planning
to implementation/event production and post-production evaluationand feedback
NOTE Different from life cycle impacts (3.6)
3.3 event organizerorganization (3.10), or group of organizations, with overall
responsibility for managing the delivery of an event (encompassing all
activities that comprise the event)
3.4 internal auditsystematic and documented process for evaluating compliance with the
management system
8/8/2019 136032
10/34
BS 8901:2007
4 BSI 2007
3.5 key performance indicator
KPIpre-agreed measurements (quantitative or qualitative) of performance
against the objectives of an organization
3.6 life cycle impact
impact occurring throughout the life cycle, i.e. from extraction of rawmaterials to end-of-life (cradle-to-grave)
3.7 management systemsystem to establish policy and objectives and to achieve those objectives
3.8 maturity profilepictorial representation of the maturity of an organizations sustainable
development management system derived from its maturity matrix
(seeA.2)
3.9 objectiveintended outcome of a strategy
3.10 organizationcommercial or voluntary, body or individual that takes responsibility for
some or all of the management of an event and its sustainable
development
3.11 stakeholderindividual or group concerned with or affected by event(s) and/or its
sustainability
3.12 supplierorganization providing products, services or facilities
3.13 supply chainnetwork of suppliers, including subcontractors
4 Claiming compliance with thisstandard
An organization shall be deemed to have complied with this standard if
it has met all relevant requirements in Clauses 5 to 13.
Claims of partial compliance, e.g. to Phase 1 in preparation for an event,
may also be made.NOTE 1 British Standards are worded to enable compliance to be
verified by the first party (the organization), second party (stakeholders)
or an independent third party (such as a certification body).
NOTE 2 Organizations within the supply chain may claim compliance if
their involvement in the event meets the relevant requirements of this
standard.
NOTE 3 Organizations may only claim compliance for activities by the
organization that are directly related to events.
NOTE 4 Only the event client and/or event organizer(s) can claim that
an event has been managed in compliance with this standard.
8/8/2019 136032
11/34
BSI 2007 5
BS 8901:2007
NOTE 5 Claims of compliance may take the form of:
[Insert name of event] has been planned in compliance with BS 8901,
Phase 1. (The event organizer has implemented Phase 1.)
[Insert name of event] has been planned and implemented in compliance
with BS 8901, Phase 1 and Phase 2. (The event organizer has
implemented Phase 1 and Phase 2.)
[Insert name of event] was managed in compliance with BS 8901.
(The event organizer has implemented all phases of this standard for this
particular event.)
[Insert name of recurring event] is managed in compliance
with BS 8901. (The event organizer has implemented all phases
at least once.)
[Insert name of supplier/organization] is BS 8901 compliant.
(All phases have been implemented for all events.)
5 Phase 1Phase 1 of the sustainable event management system shall include:
a) producing a sustainability policy (Clause 6);
b) identification of issues (Clause 7); and
c) using the issues to finalize the objectives, and set key performance
indicators (KPIs) and targets (Clause 8).
6 Organizational commitment tosustainable development
NOTE 1 Organizations complying with this standard will require their
suppliers to contribute to the management system. The standard is useful
in identifying the likely requirements (i.e. tender specifications and
conditions of contract).
The organization shall draft a policy, approved by top management,
describing its commitment to the principles of sustainable development
and to promote those principles for event-related activities.
Where appropriate, the policy shall draw upon the following elements
of the client or organizations corporate/event strategy:
a) leadership;
b) mission and vision;
c) event/activity purpose;
d) corporate values;
e) key sustainability issues; and
f) position on the organizations maturity matrix.
The organization shall develop its maturity matrix based on the
guidance given inAnnex A. The organization shall then determine its
current/target position on the matrix.
NOTE 2 The maturity matrix helps determine the quality of the systems
being used to identify issues and set objectives.
8/8/2019 136032
12/34
BS 8901:2007
6 BSI 2007
This policy shall represent the foundation for all further sustainable
development management activities for the event. The statement shall
also define the scope of the commitment in terms of its application to
the event. This shall include all event-related activities over which the
organization has control for the duration of its involvement in the event
and associated with:
1) the organization and supply chain organizations (product and
service providers); and,
2) the event life cycle, from concept through planning,
implementation, and final evaluation and review.
7 PlanningCOMMENTARY ON CLAUSE 7
The preferred solution should be derived through a process of propose a
solution, evaluate, refine (by considering other options), and re-evaluate.
Where requirements of the standard are expressed as where applicable,the organization has to justify any decision as to which requirements
apply.
Stakeholder engagement is undertaken to improve the understanding
the economic, social and environmental impacts of the event activities.
This includes activities associated with the full lifecycle stages of
events, as well as indirect impacts, for example, those associated with
the supply chain.
7.1 Identifying issues
An important mechanism for identifying issues shall be stakeholder
engagement, although key issues should already have been identifiedwithin the sustainable development policy (Clause 6).
In order to successfully engage with its stakeholders, the organization
shall:
a) identify and consult with stakeholders on event sustainability
issues (including those identified within the sustainable
development policy);
b) demonstrate that issues and concerns have been considered; and
c) make ongoing stakeholder engagement an integral part of the
management process.
7.2 StakeholdersNOTE Guidelines for stakeholder identification and engagement are
given in BS 8900.
The identification of stakeholders shall,where applicable, encompass:
a) event client(s);
b) supply chain elements (event organizer(s), venue, suppliers,
contractors, etc.);
c) staff;
d) event customers, spectators and/or participants;
e) partners and sponsors;
f) sector interest organizations (e.g. trade/industry bodies);
8/8/2019 136032
13/34
BSI 2007 7
BS 8901:2007
g) the local community (including neighbours and transport hubs
where applicable);
h) statutory bodies (e.g. local authorities);
i) emergency services;
j) security services; and
k) relevant non-governmental organizations (e.g. environmentalgroups).
The organization shall identify those stakeholders that have a legal right
to be consulted.
8 Finalize objectives, and set keyperformance indicators and targets
8.1 Establish issue significance
The organization shall assess sustainability issue significance(including risks and opportunities), using feedback from stakeholders
(see Clause 7). The results of the risk assessment shall be shared with
relevant stakeholders.
NOTE 1 Examples of information on determining issues is provided
in Table 1.
NOTE 2 From a practical point of view, the effort required to manage
sustainable development should be proportional to the nature and
significance of the issues identified.
8.2 Finalize objectives
The organization shall finalize objectives based upon:
a) the sustainability aspirations and policies of the organization
(Clause6); and
b) the key sustainability issues (8.1).
8.3 Assessing the options for improved event
sustainability
COMMENTARY ON8.3
There is often more than one approach that can be implemented to provide
the solution, and these are referred to as the alternative plans. Thepreferred solution is the approach that is adopted to deliver the event.
It might not be possible to achieve all of the performance targets;
consequently there will be trade-offs, and the preferred solution might be
represented by the optimal trade-off of performance across a range of
objectives/targets. For example, several venues may be proposed: through
consideration of venue options, Venue A might be considered more
suitable than others on the basis of facilities (e.g. disability access);
however, another venue, considered less suitable in this regard,
might have better transport links, offering opportunities to reduce
transport-related impacts.
The organization shall consider and document alternative plans to find
the preferred solution, in line with sustainability objectives.
The organization shall, where appropriate, ensure that suppliers are
involved in the process.
8/8/2019 136032
14/34
BS 8901:2007
8 BSI 2007
Table 1 Examples of potential sustainability issues in event management
NOTE The possible objectives listed are not prescriptive and do not need to be met by every organization to
achieve compliance with this standard. However, organizations may want to consider them as a route to
compliance.
Categories Questions to determine whetheran issue exists Possible objectives
Environmental
Climate change Will the activity generate energy
demands?
Reduce energy use/demand.Promote the use of renewable supplies of energy.Offset carbon emissions associated with energy use.
Will the activity generate anincreased need for travel?
Reduce the need for transport and promote efficientmodes of travel and renewable fuels.Offset carbon emissions associated with transport use.
Air quality Will the technologies employed forthe activitys energy supply andtransport generate air emissions?
Reduce emissions to air by promoting low emissiontechnologies for energy supply and transport.
Water use Will the activity require water? Minimize water use and promote water efficiency.
Emissions to
water
Will the activity affect water quality? Maintain water quality and prevent pollution.
Will the activity affectwatercourses?
Protect watercourses and prevent pollution.
Land use Will the activity require previouslydeveloped land (rather than
greenfield sites) to be used?
Optimize the use of previously developed land when selectingthe location of an event.
Will the activity affect itssurroundings?
Design the event building/structure with consideration to itssurroundings/mitigate effects in surrounding areas.
Biodiversity Will the activity affect existingbiodiversity resources?
Protect existing biodiversity resources.Implement opportunities to enhance habitats and species.
Archaeology andcultural heritage
Will the activity affect sites ofarchaeological or cultural interest?
Protect sites of archaeological or cultural interest.
Emissions to land Will the activity give rise to risks ofground contamination at the site?
Minimize risks of ground contamination at the site.
Solid wastemanagement
Will the activity generate wastematerials?
Minimize the amount of waste materials produced.Encourage reuse, recycling and recovery of waste.
Environmental, social and economic
Procurement Productstewardship
Will recyclable or re-useable wastebe generated from the activityspurchased products?
Promote closed loop waste management by purchasingreusable products or products with a recycled content.
Will the activity give rise to ethical
or environmental issues from thesupply chain?
Promote ethical and environmental issues in the supply chain.
Are the contractual terms fair? Ensure fair contract terms with suppliers
Will those employed during theactivity have fair terms of
employment?
Promote fair terms of employment for those employed duringthe event.
Will products/services required for
the activity be produced/sourcedlocally?
Promote the use of locally produced and sourced products
and services to reduce transport impacts and support thelocal economy.
Social and economic
8/8/2019 136032
15/34
BSI 2007 9
BS 8901:2007
Health, safety and
comfort
Could the activity impact negatively
on the health, safety and well-beingof event stakeholders?
Ensure the health, safety and well-being of the stakeholders
at or likely to be affected by the event.
Security Could the activity give rise to
security issues?
Maximize security and the sense of well-being of visitors,
exhibitors and speakers.
Equal
opportunity anddiversity
Will the activity ensure equality for
all?
Ensure equality is ensured for all in relation to the event.
Community, localemployment andskills
Will the activity give rise toinvestment in local skills andemployment?
Encourage investment in local skills and employment.
Will the activity cause nuisance tothe local community?
Avoid nuisance to the local community.
Amenity Will the activity provide suitableamenities to enhance the area/siteand visitor experience?
Provide suitable amenities to enhance the area/site and visitorexperience.
Viability Will the activity be viablefinancially?
Ensure the financial viability of the event, including securityof funding.
Managing delivery
Governance Will there be an appropriate
governance framework for theactivity in terms of sustainable
event delivery?
Implement an appropriate governance framework to manage
sustainable delivery of the event.
Communication,stakeholder
engagement andawareness raising
Will there be regularcommunication with stakeholders
throughout the activity toencourage improved sustainabilityperformance?
Communicate with stakeholders regularly to encourageimproved sustainability performance.
Supply chainmanagement
Will the costs and benefits of theevent be shared fairly throughoutthe supply chain?
Ensure that the costs and benefits of sustainable events areequitable throughout the supply chain
Will supply chain managementprocedures be put in place for the
activity to achieve a desired level of
sustainability performance?
Implement supply chain management procedures thatsuccessfully deliver the sustainability objectives of the event.
Table 1 Examples of potential sustainability issues in event management (continued)
NOTE The possible objectives listed are not prescriptive and do not need to be met by every organization to
achieve compliance with this standard. However, organizations may want to consider them as a route to
compliance.
Categories Questions to determine whether
an issue exists
Possible objectives
8/8/2019 136032
16/34
BS 8901:2007
10 BSI 2007
8.4 Setting key performance indicators (KPIs) and
targets
The organization shall identify key performance indicators (KPIs) and
targets relevant to the sustainability objectives and set challenging but
realistic targets for itself and its suppliers.
For each objective, a target(s) shall be set based on the following broad
scale (and in more detail against the maturity matrix [Table A.2]), with
the aim of achieving the highest performance level and the greatest
improvement practicably possible:
a) legal compliance;
b) best current practice; and
c) beyond best current practice.
The organization shall set higher performance targets for those
objectives that it has the greatest capacity to address.
COMMENTARY ON8.4
For example, an event client might wish to go beyond best current practice
to achieve zero carbon emissions if the theme of the event is Convention
on Climate Change.
The organization should build expertise and capacity to achieve
continuous performance improvement by setting higher targets through
successive event cycles.
EXAMPLE Examples of KPIs are as follows:
Targets represent the minimum acceptable performance level and this
should be stated for each of the key performance indicators.
It should be noted that there is no requirement to meet the same
performance level for each objective. Because of the diversity of events, it
is impossible to benchmark across all events.
8.5 Review and refinement of preferred solution,
KPIs and targets
The KPIs and targets shall be reviewed and refined throughout the
planning process to reach the preferred solution.
Objectives KPIs
Reduce energy use/demand and promote the use of
renewable supplies of energy. Offset carbon emissions
associated with energy use.
Energy consumption (kWh), carbon dioxide emissions
(tonnes), renewable energy supply (%), etc. (For many
events, organizations may have to use an estimate of
these figures.)
Ensure the health, safety and comfort of the
stakeholders at the event.
Noise levels (dB), accident rate, etc.
8/8/2019 136032
17/34
BSI 2007 11
BS 8901:2007
9 Phase 2 Implementation
9.1 General
The organization shall, where necessary, modify its procedures for each
event to implement the preferred sustainability solution by: designating appropriate responsibilities;
providing the necessary training and resources;
communicating effectively with stakeholders;
effective supply chain management; and
appropriate documentation.
NOTE Where appropriate, sustainable event management systems
developed for one event may be modified, adapted and improved for
application in other events to avoid duplication of effort at the start of each
event cycle.
9.2 Roles and responsibilities
Top management shall take overall responsibility for implementing the
preferred solution by appointing a competent management
representative responsible for the process.
The organization shall establish, implement and maintain operating
procedures for key sustainability activities and operations.
9.3 Resources
The organization shall allocate appropriate resources to achievesustainable event management objectives and make the same
requirement of its suppliers. Resources shall include staffing, expertise,
training, infrastructure, technology and finance. Resource requirements
shall be assessed in terms of:
a) nature and scale of activities;
b) occurrence and duration;
c) cost/benefit; and,
d) financial planning (e.g. cash flow).
9.4 Competence and trainingThe organization shall ensure that relevant employees are trained or
instructed in the practical requirements, in relation to their role, of the
sustainable event management solution.
Training may include:
a) sustainability policy, procedures and requirements;
b) significant sustainability issues;
c) legal compliance issues; and,
d) consequences of non-compliance with policy, procedures and
requirements.
Training and development programmes shall be reviewed and updated
periodically to develop essential competencies.
8/8/2019 136032
18/34
BS 8901:2007
12 BSI 2007
9.5 Supply chain management
NOTE 1 In order to achieve the objectives for a more sustainable event,
it is essential to extend the principles of the sustainable event
management system throughout the supply chain wherever possible
(seeAnnex B).
The organization shall establish the relevance of each of the issues,objectives, KPIs and targets to individual suppliers, and include
sufficient information in tender documentation to enable its suppliers to
demonstrate their capability to support the preferred solution.
Information provided by the organization shall include:
a) the requirements of suppliers that support the organizations
preferred solution;
b) the requirements of subcontractors that support the organizations
preferred solution;
c) the timeline and delivery milestones; and
d) the scope and level of detail required in the tender submission,
e.g. suppliers strategy for meeting objectives.
The organization shall assess tender submissions on the basis of their
capability to meet sustainability targets, cost-effectiveness and quality.
The sustainability performance criteria in the successful tender
submission should be reflected in the suppliers conditions of contract.
Sufficient detail shall be included to be able to determine instances of
non-compliance and to inform subsequent performance reviews.
NOTE 2 Where organizations do not go through a tender process they
should still consider sustainability issues when choosing suppliers.
9.6 Communication
The organization shall implement a communication plan to promote
sustainability management in a way that is consistent with the full scope
of the event and the sustainability performance objectives.
NOTE Guidance on environmental communications can be found
in BS ISO 14063.
The organization shall identify, with its stakeholders, the most effective
means of communication, and take into account the interests of
different stakeholder groups and whether the organization has control
or influence over those groups.Communications on sustainability may be integrated with other event
communications.
The communications shall include, where appropriate, the following:
a) aspirations for event(s);
b) the system for managing sustainability;
c) issues, objectives, KPIs and targets;
d) guidance, best practice in achieving objectives, targets, etc.;
e) relevance to organizations (roles and responsibilities);
f) key contacts; and
g) progress in relation to performance (monitoring stage).
8/8/2019 136032
19/34
BSI 2007 13
BS 8901:2007
9.7 Documentation and record-keeping
NOTE 1 Documentation of the management system, as well as issues
arising from its implementation for an event, are essential in
demonstrating transparency and accountability, as well as enabling the
possibility of third party verification.
NOTE 2 Organizations that collect data about stakeholders are subject tothe Data Protection Act 1998 [1].
The organization shall establish, implement, maintain and continually
improve a document management system. The organization shall
ensure, where appropriate, that its suppliers contribute to the document
management system. At this stage, the document management system
shall include as a minimum:
a) the statements of policy required by Clause 6;
b) a stakeholder register and records of stakeholder engagement
(see Clause 7);
c) a description of the key issues addressed by the sustainable eventmanagement system, and the relevant objectives, KPIs and targets
(see Clause 8); and
d) data captured during monitoring and measurement activities,
including incidents of operational non-compliance.
Where applicable, the document management system shall also include:
1) a list of legislation and policy relevant to sustainability;
2) organizational roles and responsibilities (of the organization itself
and suppliers over whom the organization has control);
3) supply chain: procurement strategy, tender specifications and
conditions of contract;
4) records of communications;
5) audit reports;
6) procedures for control of documents and records, including roles
and responsibilities for document management and approval.
NOTE 3 Documentation should be proportionate to the organizations
role.
10 Phase 3Phase 3 of the sustainable event management system shall include:
a) assessing performance (Clause 11);
b) review (Clause 12); and
c) follow up/feed forward (Clause 13).
8/8/2019 136032
20/34
BS 8901:2007
14 BSI 2007
11 Assessing performance
11.1 Monitoring and measurement
The organization shall establish, implement, maintain and continually
improve appropriate procedures for measuring performance in relationto the KPIs identified in 8.4.
11.2 Evaluating compliance and responding to
non-conformity
The organization shall evaluate compliance with this standard. The
organization shall keep records of the outcomes of the evaluation of
compliance.
The organization shall also establish, implement, maintain and
continually improve procedures for managing non-conformities
identified by the compliance evaluation system.These procedures shall define requirements for:
a) anticipating non-conformities and recommending preventative
action;
b) correcting actual incidents of non-conformity;
c) investigating the causes of actual non-conformities and making
recommendations to prevent recurrence; and,
d) recording interventions in the form of preventative or corrective
actions and recommending procedural changes to reduce future
risk of non-conformity.
The organization shall ensure, where appropriate, that suppliers
contribute to compliance evaluation and to non-conformity response.
11.3 Sustainable event management system audit
The organization shall maintain procedures for periodic sustainable
event management system audits, to ensure that:
a) the implementation and maintenance requirements of the
management system are being met; and,
b) the implementation of the management system is achieving the
desired outcomes in terms of the sustainability performance of theevent.
The organization shall establish, implement and maintain procedures
for auditing that include:
1) the frequency, scope, methodology and criteria for internal
auditing;
2) roles and responsibilities for internal audit; and,
3) communicating outcomes and recommendations from audits to
top management.
Where appropriate, the organization shall ensure that the requirements
for auditing are extended to its suppliers.
8/8/2019 136032
21/34
BSI 2007 15
BS 8901:2007
12 ReviewThe organization shall conduct management reviews at regular intervals
appropriate to the scale and frequency of its involvement in events. The
organization shall synchronize management reviews with the event life
cycle, or where there is continuous involvement in multiple events,
conduct management reviews at intervals that maximize learningopportunities from different events. Management reviews shall assess
performance against the following issues:
a) satisfying the needs of stakeholders as identified by stakeholder
engagement;
b) meeting contractual conditions;
c) the organizations suppliers meeting their contractual conditions;
d) achieving objectives and targets;
e) effectiveness in achieving objectives and targets;
f) attention to non-conformities;
g) implementation of previous review recommendations; and
h) progress across the organizations maturity matrix (see Clause 6).
13 Follow upThe organization shall feed the lessons learned from each event to its
own events and, where practicable, make the information available to
organizers of other events.
To remain BS 8901 compliant, the organization shall implement lessons
learned and shall ensure that it progresses across its maturity matrix.
8/8/2019 136032
22/34
BS 8901:2007
16 BSI 2007
Annex A (informative) Guidance for use of this specification
A.1 Assessing risks and opportunity Identifying
issues and establishing significance
Issues arise in relation to activities. The organization should compile achecklist of event management activities that can be amended and
added to through successive event cycles. Table A.1 provides a list of
examples of an event activities checklist.
The precise activities listed in Table A.1 are not intended to be
exhaustive and will vary considerably depending on the role of an
organization in event management, and the precise nature of specific
events.
Table A.1 Examples of activities in event management
Activity Is this activity relevant
to the event(Yes/No)?
Risk management
Major incident/emergency planning
Fire safety, including fireworks and pyrotechnics
Health and safety
Medical, ambulance and first-aid management
Waste management, disposal and litter picking
Food, drink, water and hygiene controls
Sanitary facilities
Licensing and local consultation
Planning and management
Crowd management, including children
Information and welfare, including visitor information and VIP services
Involvement/participation for people with special needs
Staffing
Communications, including internal and external signage and banners
Merchandising and special licensing
Venue, including site selection, preparation, design, construction and management
Transport management, including site trafficAccess, including perimeter and external infrastructure, temporary roadways barriers,fencing, and facilities for special needs
Security
Power sources: installation and lighting
Sound: systems, noise and vibration
Special attractions, amusements and effects, including promotional displays
Structures: temporary and permanent
Performers, including children, animals
TV and media, AV, technology services
Accommodation, including campingAsset reinstatement, refurbishment, re-use and recycling
8/8/2019 136032
23/34
BSI 2007 17
BS 8901:2007
The key (or significant) issues can be identified by applying the
following criteria to the sustainability issues identified:
a) the magnitude of effects: i.e. the size and severity of the effects;
b) the time period over which the effects occur;
c) whether the effects are permanent or temporary:for example,
construction for a major event may result in loss of green
space or habitat through permanently altered land use,
whereas damage or disruption to habitat from erecting
temporary structures may not; this could also take into
account any intended (i.e. positive) legacy effects of the event;
d) whether the effects are positive or negative: although
identification of issues generally tends to identify negative
consequences of activities, it is also important to appreciate
that activities can also generate positive effects; for example,
fixtures and fittings that would otherwise contribute to the
waste stream could be donated to local charities/community
groups;
e) whether there are cumulative effects;
f) whether there are secondary or indirect effects;
g) whether there are synergistic effects: an example of a
synergistic effect is where a crowded venue has a reduced
heating requirement in winter or an increased air
conditioning requirement in summer;
h) the probability of the effects occurring; and
i) the frequency of event occurrence.
A.2 Review and follow up Creation and use of a
maturity matrix
Organizations should routinely track and review their progress in
relation to continuously improving their sustainable event management
capabilities and outcomes. BS 8900 proposed an outline development
maturity matrix framework to assist organizations to achieve this.
This tool should be implemented by event industry organizations in
order to establish their level of development in terms of sustainable
development along a scale ranging from minimum involvement
to full engagement.
The practices associated with the main principles of sustainability
management such as inclusivity, integrity, stewardship and
transparency are represented by characteristics/criteria appropriate to
an organization at different stages of its maturity with regard to
sustainable development. For example, an organization may consider
itself to have met its sustainability objectives fully (represented by full
engagement) in key management issues such as supply chain by fully
recognizing the community of interest and providing assistance to lower
tiers where necessary.
Organizations should prepare their own maturity matrix based on the
outline in Table A.2 and taking into consideration the principles andpractices that are relevant to them.
8/8/2019 136032
24/34
BS 8901:2007
18 BSI 2007
Organizations should determine their current position in their maturity
matrix, by identifying the most applicable criteria. This process will
produce a maturity profile. Particular attention should then be given to
areas which the organization has identified as weaknesses or potential
growth areas.
The matrix should be kept up to date to reflect changing circumstances.The position of the organization depicted by the matrix should be used
in the review process and/or used to demonstrate their sustainability
progress to stakeholders.
8/8/2019 136032
25/34
8/8/2019 136032
26/34
BS 8901:2007
20 BSI 2007
Annex B (informative) Principles to be applied to supplychain management
B.1 What is sustainable procurement and why is it
required?Successful implementation of sustainable event management depends
on the sustainability objectives being extended throughout the supply
chain. This requires engagement with a wide range of suppliers, from
specialists to non-specialists. The following section provides
information on sustainable procurement and a checklist of potential
issues is provided in Table B.1.
Sustainable procurement is the integration of sustainability
management into all aspects of the procurement cycle including:
a) defining the need for sustainable procurement;
b) evaluating possible options;
c) design and specification;
d) supplier selection;
e) tender evaluation;
f) post-contract management;
g) supplier development; and,
h) performance review.
Four key aims should be addressed when integrating sustainability
management into the procurement process:
1) minimizing the impacts of products and/or services (e.g. impacts
on health, air quality, generation of hazardous waste);
2) minimizing demand for resources (e.g. by using resource-efficient
products such as energy efficient appliances, fuel-efficient vehicles
and products incorporating recycled content);
3) minimizing the negative impacts of the supply chain itself, in
particular the social aspects (e.g. giving preference to local and/or
smaller suppliers and those that meet minimum ethical, human
rights and employment standards); and
4) ensuring that fair contract terms are applied and respected.
8/8/2019 136032
27/34
BSI 2007 21
BS 8901:2007
Table B.1 Sustainable procurement checklist
Categories of issues for consideration in sustainable procurement Have the issues
been considered?
(Yes/No)
Corporate commitment sustainable procurement
Is there organization-wide consensus on the approach to sustainable procurement for eventmanagement projects?
Is a senior procurement director or manager responsible for implementation of sustainableprocurement and have adequate resources been allocated?
Policy for procurement and strategic planning
Has a procurement policy been defined, documented and communicated?
Has a sustainable purchasing strategy been defined and adopted, and is it widely understood?
Is the role of the procurement function defined in terms of achieving organizational sustainability
targets?
Are policies/codes of conduct/guidelines/minimum standards used to demonstrate what the
organization will/will not buy?
Are the most important categories of procurement identified for targeted action?
Are future procurements mapped?
Is the purchase core to the business?
Are there a limited number of suppliers?
Will the company suffer negative PR in the event of supply failure?
Does the scope of the sustainable procurement strategy cover
Economic issues, social, health and safety, environmental and natural resource issues?
Do the sustainability objectives embedded within procurement
Promote positive sustainability outcomes as well as managing negative impacts?
Demonstrate concern for, and effort to maintain and build reputation?
Assist in incorporating sustainability values into supplier strategies and develop performancemeasures for mutual benefits (e.g. innovation, cost reduction, quality enhancement, increasedflexibility, compliance and proactive risk management)?
Contribute to national policies by stimulating markets for sustainable goods?
Take the form of a tender specification and, where necessary, additional guidance?
Are targets/KPIs
Linked to the overall organizational sustainability objectives?
Compliant with legislation as a minimum, or industry best practice standards?
Related to a defined outcome?Driving real improvements through the supply chain?
Transparent?
Where applicable, based on sound science?
SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, timebound)?
Assessment criteria
Has a weighting/scoring system for supplier/tender evaluation been developed?
Have life cycle impacts and whole life costs issues been considered?
Has the environmental purchasing hierarchy been applied?
Is the supplier prepared to sign up to a supplier code of conduct?
Does the supplier meet industry best practice standards?
Does the supplier represent best value?
Are the contract terms fair?
8/8/2019 136032
28/34
BS 8901:2007
22 BSI 2007
Have best practice tools/techniques etc. been incorporated, such as
A supplier code of conduct? If so, does the scope of this code include: child labour?
forced labour?
health and safety?
freedom of association and collective bargaining?
discrimination?
disciplinary practices/harsh and inhumane treatment?
working hours?
remuneration and benefits?
personal management systems?
employment security?
community relations?
environmental issues?
Policies/codes of conduct/guidelines/minimum standards?
The environmental purchasing hierarchy: rethink, eliminate, reduce, re-use, recycle, dispose?
Checklists and specifications?
Lists of pre-approved materials?
Involvement of sustainability personnel in contract negotiations?
Supplier development programmes to set requirements, form action plans, provide support andmonitor progress through performance reviews?
Supplier audits and/or frequent supplier visits?
Integration with existing procurement tools such as total life costing, supplier performance
classification and ratings, quality procedures, terms and conditions and Total Quality
Management?
Contractual requirements providing detail on sustainability standards and contract milestones?
Pilot programmes to try out new sustainable products/services?
Work with R&D to solve sustainability problems?
Supplier training and seminars/presentations, etc.?
Inclusion of eco labels or eco label criteria in specifications?
Dialogue with suppliers
Is a combination of the command and control and partnership supplier relationship approach
used?
Do contractual terms with suppliers reflect equal capacities to contract?
Are communications with suppliers non-adversarial?
Are expectations and roles within the communication clear?
Have the suppliers been consulted regarding the communication?
Are positive communication actions rewarded?
Is dialogue between the organization and the supplier bases set up at an early stage?
Are suppliers encouraged to be innovative with sustainable product options?
Are variants to specifications considered in order to encourage performance improvementsbeyond functional specification?
Are both winning and losing suppliers constructively debriefed?
Are new bidders introduced for each invitation to tender (ITT) to facilitate competition?
Has the organization, where necessary, engaged with trade/industry bodies to assist with defining
specifications, best practice, etc.?
Table B.1 Sustainable procurement checklist (continued)
Categories of issues for consideration in sustainable procurement Have the issues
been considered?
(Yes/No)
8/8/2019 136032
29/34
BSI 2007 23
BS 8901:2007
B.2 When should sustainable procurement issues
be considered?
Sustainability issues should be considered at the earliest stage of the
procurement process by building relevant criteria into product/service
specification. This allows options to be selected that meet the
specification but that also provide the best value for money. This
approach avoids potential conflicts between environmental, social andeconomic issues arising later in the procurement process.
B.3 What does sustainable procurement involve?
Key steps that should be undertaken are:
a) establishing a policy for sustainable procurement;
b) producing tender specifications that incorporate sustainability
performance criteria;
c) engaging in dialogue with suppliers/potential suppliers; and,
d) assessing tender submissions and evaluating sustainabilityperformance throughout the procurement cycle.
Has sustainability management been incorporated into the procurement cycle stages,
including:Defining the service need: developing the programme or project brief?
Developing the business case: appraising options and establishing value for money?
Defining the procurement approach: specifying the requirements?
Competitive procurement: inviting and evaluating bids and selecting the supplier?
Awarding and implementing the contract: prepare for delivery?
Managing the contract: maintaining performance, value for money and fairness?
Reviewing the key decision points in the procurement cycle?
Monitoring and reporting
Is the strategy implementation monitored through appropriate performance measures, KPIs and
benchmarks?
Is information collected during the monitoring process assessed, reported and acted upon?
Are the lessons learned documented and possible improvements identified for future activities?
Table B.1 Sustainable procurement checklist (continued)
Categories of issues for consideration in sustainable procurement Have the issues
been considered?
(Yes/No)
8/8/2019 136032
30/34
BS 8901:2007
24 BSI 2007
B.4 Sustainable procurement policy and
strategic planning
A procurement policy should be established and documented that is
aligned with the sustainability policy for the event as a whole and which
elaborates on (in the context of sustainable procurement) the issues,
objectives, KPIs and targets established for the event as a whole.The sustainable procurement policy should:
a) define the scope (i.e. extent) of sustainable procurement,
e.g. economic, social, environmental and natural resources;
life cycle approach, key event themes, etc.;
b) state the desired performance level, e.g. basic legal compliance or
extend to beyond best current practice including building
environmental values into supplier strategies;
c) define the approach/criteria for assessing suppliers during tender
evaluation;
d) assess consistency and alignment of performance requirements forsuppliers with the organizations expectations for itself.
B.5 Techniques for assessing and managing
sustainability issues in procurement
The following considerations should be taken into account in defining
the approach to assessing/managing suppliers and prospective
suppliers:
a) the extent to which the suppliers products/services are critical to
the purchasing organization;
b) the level of expenditure relative to the size of the supplier, in order
to establish the degree of influence that can be exerted;
c) the key social, economic, environmental and natural resources
issues and associated risks relating to the product/service; and
d) separating suppliers by industry, service or product type in order
to develop appropriate means of communicating/engaging with
them.
8/8/2019 136032
31/34
BSI 2007 25
BS 8901:2007
The organization should select from appropriate approaches, tools
and techniques to assess and manage sustainable procurement.
These include:
1) weighting/scoring systems quantitative/qualitative ways of
assessing the merits of proposed solutions applied to the KPIs;
2) life cycle assessment and whole life costing: the true impacts ofproducts and/or services based on a cradle-to-grave approach
i.e. a holistic approach which assesses the environmental aspects
and potential impacts associated with the manufacture, use and
disposal of a product;
3) the environmental purchasing hierarchy rethink, eliminate,
reduce, re-use, recycle, dispose, an approach to minimizing
natural resource impacts which is similar to the waste
management hierarchy;
4) supplier code of conduct can be employed by the contracting
organization in order to ensure that their suppliers conform with
the social and ethical elements of sustainable procurement, as well
the environmental aspects;
5) industry best practice standards for sustainability management
for specific industry sectors/areas defined by the industry and
representing the industrys assessment of appropriate
performance levels; and
6) best value using the UK government definition, the optimum
combination of whole life costs and benefits to meet the
customers requirement; this approach enables sustainability and
quality to be taken into account when service delivery options are
being considered.
B.6 Developing a dialogue with suppliers
There are two broad approaches that can be used to establish
sustainability goals for suppliers; the command and control approach
and the partnership approach.
Command and control approach: This approach involves close
management and regulation of suppliers and includes the use of a
contract that includes standards and checklists which organizations
may insist their suppliers must comply with. Although it can be
effective, it can also be inflexible by making suppliers react to precise
requirements rather than proactively engaging with the objectives for
sustainability. This sometimes leads to a tick box approach whereby
the supplier takes the minimum measures to meet the performance
standard required.
Partnership approach: This approach involves relationship building
with the supplier and uses influence, information and education with the
aim of ensuring that both the supplier and the organization are working
towards similar goals. In the long term, the partnership approach
tends to be more effective than command and control, however, it
requires more effort and investment. Where particular products and
services are required on a routine basis, it might be most appropriate to
invest in the partnership approach.
It is likely that organizations will adopt a combination of the above
techniques.
8/8/2019 136032
32/34
BS 8901:2007
26 BSI 2007
B.7 Assessment of tender submissions
Tender submissions should be evaluated using the criteria and
assessment techniques outlined previously. Once the preferred supplier
has been selected, the contracting organization should incorporate the
sustainability performance information provided in the suppliers
tender submissions into the conditions of contract. Sufficient detailshould be included to be able to determine instances of non-compliance
(i.e. where suppliers have failed to achieve expected performance) and
to inform subsequent performance reviews.
B.8 Sustainable procurement Monitoring and
reporting
Where practicable, the strategy implementation should be monitored
throughout the implementation stage using appropriate KPIs and
benchmarks. Information collected during the monitoring process
should then be assessed and reported upon. The lessons learned
should be documented and incorporated into the review process to
identify improvements for future activities.
8/8/2019 136032
33/34
BSI 2007 27
BS 8901:2007
Bibliography
Standards publications
BS 8900, Guidance for managing sustainable development
BS EN ISO 9001, Quality management systems Requirements
BS EN ISO 14001,Environmental management systems
Requirements with guidance for use
BS ISO 14063,Environmental management Environmental
communication Guidelines and examples
Other publications
GREAT BRITAIN. Data Protection Act 1998. The Stationery Office.
(www.tso.co.uk)
Further readingBS 8406,Event stewarding and crowd safety services
Code of practice
BS EN ISO 22000,Food safety management systems
Requirements for any organization in the food chain
BS OHSAS 18001, Occupational health and safety management
systems Requirements
GREAT BRITAIN, The event safety guide A guide to health, safety
and welfare at music and similar events. HSG195. HSE Books 1999.
Greener events, a guide to reducing the environmental impact of
conferences and seminars. Government Office for the South West.2007 (www.oursouthwest.com)
8/8/2019 136032
34/34
BSI British Standards InstitutionBSI is the independent national body responsible for preparing British Standards.
It presents the UK view on standards in Europe and at the international level.
It is incorporated by Royal Charter.
Revisions
British Standards are updated by amendment or revision. Users of British Standards
should make sure that they possess the latest amendments or editions.
It is the constant aim of BSI to improve the quality of our products and services.
We would be grateful if anyone finding an inaccuracy or ambiguity while using this
British Standard would inform the Secretary of the technical committee responsible,
the identity of which can be found on the inside front cover.
Tel: +44 (0)20 8996 9000. Fax: +44 (0)20 8996 7400.
BSI offers members an individual updating service called PLUS which ensures that
subscribers automatically receive the latest editions of standards.
Buying standards
Orders for all BSI, international and foreign standards publications should be
addressed to Customer Services. Tel: +44 (0)20 8996 9001.
Fax: +44 (0)20 8996 7001. Email: [email protected]. Standards are also
available from the BSI website at http://www.bsi-global.com.
In response to orders for international standards, it is BSI policy to supply the BSI
implementation of those that have been published as British Standards, unless
otherwise requested.
Information on standards
BSI provides a wide range of information on national, European and internationalstandards through its Library and its Technical Help to Exporters Service. Various
BSI electronic information services are also available which give details on all its
products and services. Contact the Information Centre. Tel: +44 (0)20 8996 7111.
Fax: +44 (0)20 8996 7048. Email: [email protected].
Subscribing members of BSI are kept up to date with standards developments and
receive substantial discounts on the purchase price of standards. For details of these
and other benefits contact Membership Administration. Tel: +44 (0)20 8996 7002.
Fax: +44 (0)20 8996 7001. Email: [email protected].
Information regarding online access to British Standards via British Standards
Online can be found at http://www.bsi-global.com/bsonline.
Further information about BSI is available on the BSI website at
http://www.bsi-global.com.
Copyright
Copyright subsists in all BSI publications. BSI also holds the copyright, in the UK, of
the publications of the international standardization bodies. Except as permitted
under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 no extract may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic,
photocopying, recording or otherwise without prior written permission from BSI.
This does not preclude the free use, in the course of implementing the standard, of
necessary details such as symbols, and size, type or grade designations. If these
details are to be used for any other purpose than implementation then the prior
written permission of BSI must be obtained.Details and advice can be obtained from the Copyright & Licensing Manager
BS 8901:2007
389 Chiswick High Road