13693780310001610056

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 13693780310001610056

    1/8

    Prevalence ofMalassezia species on various body sites in

    clinically healthy subjects representing different age

    groups

    ADITYA K. GUPTA*,$ & YATIKA KOHLI$,%

    *Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook and Womens College Health Science Center (Sunnybrook

    site) and the University of Toronto, Toronto, $Mediprobe Laboratories, London, Ontario and%The Hospital for Sick Children,

    Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    To investigate the distribution of Malassezia species on four body sites (scalp,

    forehead, chest and back), we employed contact plates filled with Leeming/

    Notman agar to sample 245 clinically healthy subjects, representing six age groups

    (AG) (AG I, 0/3 years; AG II, 4/14 years; AG III, 15/25 years; AG IV, 26/40

    years; AG V, 41/60 years; AG VI, over 60 years). The number of colony forming

    units was recorded for every plate positive for Malassezia species, and the species

    were identified. Younger individuals (B/14 years) yielded a culture positive forMalassezia significantly less frequently than did older individuals (]/15 years). M.

    globosa was cultured at significantly elevated frequency on younger subjects. M.

    sympodialis was present at low frequency on younger subjects, but was found in

    higher amounts on the skin of adolescents and adults. The amount and kind of

    Malassezia species that can be recovered from human skin varies with age and

    body site.

    Keywords age, contact plates, Malassezia, skin, yeasts

    Introduction

    Yeasts of the genus Malassezia are a normal part of the

    flora of human skin. In susceptible individuals, how-

    ever, these yeasts appear to play a causative role in

    various superficial dermatoses, including pityriasis

    versicolor, seborrheic dermatitis, Malassezia folliculitis,

    and some variants of psoriasis and atopic dermatitis

    [1]. The yeasts have been found on upwards of 90% of

    normal adults and are also commonly isolated from

    lesional skin [2]. While Malassezia species tend to

    colonize lipid-rich body sites such as the chest, back,

    face and scalp [3], the relationship between coloniza-

    tion patterns and age group is less clear. A number of

    studies indicate that there is a difference in the

    colonization pattern of Malassezia species in different

    age groups, with an increase in colonization appearing

    to occur at puberty when quantities of skin lipidsincrease [4,5]. In addition, when colonization does

    occur in children, it appears to more likely to happen

    on the head than on the trunk [6]. With the recent

    reclassification of the genus Malassezia , there has been

    a resurgence of interest in these yeasts and in the

    possibility of variation in species distribution in differ-

    ent body sites and dermatoses. This study investigates

    whether there is a difference in the amount and kinds of

    Malassezia species in different age groups.

    Previous studies investigating the relationship be-

    tween age and colonization with Malassezia species

    were based on an older classification in which the

    yeasts were classified as the genus Pityrosporum [4,7].

    In the previous nomenclature, the two lipophilic

    variants were known as P. ovale and P. orbiculare;

    however, there was controversy over whether these

    variants represented different species, or simply differ-

    ent variants of a single species. The relative prevalence

    of these yeasts in human hosts has been found to vary

    with age, body site and geographical location [2,4,8].

    Correspondence: Dr Aditya K. Gupta, Suite 6, 490 Wonderland

    Road South, London, Ontario, Canada, N6K 1L6. Tel.: 519 657

    4222; E-mail: [email protected]

    Received 8 November 2002; Accepted 2 July 2003

    2004 ISHAM DOI: 10.1080/13693780310001610056

    Medical Mycology February 2004, 42, 35/42

  • 7/30/2019 13693780310001610056

    2/8

    Age has also been implicated as a factor in the

    amount of Malassezia isolated from the skin. In

    general, colony counts are higher in adults than in

    children, though the amount of yeast obtained de-

    creases again in elderly individuals [9]. The yeasts are

    less frequently isolated from infants and children,

    though Bergbrant and Broberg found P. ovale to be

    quite common in children [7].

    The taxonomy of Malassezia is now quite different

    than that used in these studies. Despite the controversy

    over the relationship between P. orbiculare and P.

    ovale, most investigators believed that the two forms

    represented a single species [10]. However, there was

    also controversy over whether the genus should be

    named Pityrosporum or Malassezia . Some investiga-

    tors even used both designations, describing the yeasts

    cultivated from healthy skin as P. orbiculare or P. ovale

    and reserving the name Malassezia furfur to indicate

    the pathogenic mycelial form of the organism cultured

    from lesions of pityriasis versicolor. The currentlyaccepted generic name is Malassezia [11].

    In 1996, the genus Malassezia was reclassified and

    seven species were delineated [12,13]. M. pachydermatis

    remains the sole recognized species that does not

    require exogenous lipids in order to grow. The remain-

    ing six lipophilic species are M. furfur, M. sympodialis,

    M. restricta , M. slooffiae, M. obtusa and M. globosa .

    All of these species have been isolated from human

    skin, though with varying frequencies.

    Since this reclassification, several studies have begun

    to determine the differences in prevalence of the six

    lipophilic Malassezia species. Some progress has been

    made in discovering the geographical variation inspecies distribution; in addition, there are indications

    that the dominant species may vary at different body

    sites and in different skin conditions [3,14]. To our

    knowledge, however, this is the first study to investigate

    differences in the type and amount of Malassezia

    species in different age groups. Because the amount

    and composition of skin surface lipids varies with age

    [15,16]. we hypothesized that alterations in the habitat

    provided by human skin will affect the amount and

    species of Malassezia yeasts present on the skin.

    Materials and methods

    Preparation of contact plates

    BBL RODAC (Beckton Dickinson, MD, USA)

    contact plates (4.5 cm diameter) filled with Leeming/

    Notman agar were used for sampling, as described

    previously [3].

    Sample and sampling procedure

    We sampled 245 individuals from six different age

    groups (AG). These six age groups were: AG I, 0/3

    years (n0/33); AG II, 4/14 years (n0/55); AG III, 15/

    25 years (n0/43); AG IV, 26/40 years (n0/40); AG V,

    41/60 years (n0/44); AG VI, over 60 years (n0/30). All

    of the individuals sampled were clinically healthyindividuals (i.e. with no Malassezia -related skin condi-

    tions) and informed consent (on the protocol approved

    by an independent Review Board) was obtained from

    the volunteers or their guardians. All of the individuals

    were being seen for conditions other than a dermatosis

    (i.e. individuals with psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, sebor-

    rheic dermatitis, etc., were excluded).

    For each individual, four body sites (scalp, forehead,

    chest and back) were sampled by pressing the contact

    plates filled with Leeming/Notman agar on the skin

    for 20 s. The flattest available surface of the body site

    was sampled in order to maximize the recovery of yeast

    in each sample. The sampling procedure, incubation of

    contact plates, counting the colony forming units

    (c.f.u.), and identification of Malassezia species among

    selected colonies was performed as described previously

    [3]. Contact plates were incubated at 358C for 7 days.

    Prior to starting the experiment we had done a pilot

    study to determine the appropriate incubation period.

    Our pilot data indicated that all six lipophilic species

    could be grown adequately and form colonies in this

    time frame. Moreover, with longer incubation times

    (i.e. 10/14 days) the medium in Rodac plates (/9/9.5

    ml medium) usually dries out at 358C. Up to five

    isolated single colonies with varied macromorphologywere picked from the contact plates and subcultured on

    Leeming/Notman agar slants before processing them

    for species identification. Malassezia species were

    identified on the basis of their micromorphology (shape

    and size of cells), physiological features (catalase

    reaction and ability to grow on Tween 20, 40, 60 and

    80, as described by Guillot et al. [17]), and molecular

    characteristics (based on PCR-restriction enzyme ana-

    lysis [REA] of the nuclear ribosomal internal tran-

    scribed spacer [ITS] and large subunit [LSU] regions as

    described previously [18]).

    Statistics

    Statistical tests were performed as follows: (i) Samples

    from individuals in different age groups and from

    different body sites that yielded a positive culture for

    Malassezia species were compared using a chi-squared

    test, with standardized residuals computed for each

    cell. Phi-coefficients were computed to estimate the

    strength of relationship between variables. (ii) A uni-

    2004 ISHAM, Medical Mycology, 42, 35/42

    36 Gupta and Kohli

  • 7/30/2019 13693780310001610056

    3/8

    variate analysis of variance was conducted to compare

    the mean c.f.u. and adjusted c.f.u. from each age group.

    (iii) A univariate analysis of variance was conducted to

    evaluate the effect of age and sex on total c.f.u.,

    followed by multivariate analysis to evaluate the effects

    of age and sex on the c.f.u. counts from each of the four

    body sites. (iv) Chi-square tests, with standardized

    residuals for each cell, were calculated to analyze the

    differential likelihood of Malassezia species, if any, to

    be recovered across different age groups and from

    different body regions. Phi coefficients were computed

    to estimate the strength of relationship between vari-

    ables.

    Tests mentioned in points (i) and (ii) were performed

    using density data (i.e. data recorded as the number of

    Malassezia c.f.u. obtained within the sample categories

    (Tables 1 and 2). Statistical tests based on the specificity

    of individual Malassezia species as mentioned in point

    (iii) were carried out using frequency data (data based

    on the number of contact plates yielding at least oneisolate of the species in question; Tables 3 and 4).

    Results

    Recovery of Malassezia species from individuals of different

    age groups

    Overall, a positive culture was obtained from 70% of

    individuals sampled in all age groups from one or more

    body sites. Occurrence of a positive culture was highest

    (93.3%) in AG VI (over 60 years) and lowest (36.3%) in

    AG-I and II (0/14 years) (Table 1). Based on a

    calculation of standardized residual scores, signifi-cantly fewer than expected AG-I and AG-II individuals

    yielded a positive culture.

    Mean and adjusted c.f.u.

    The mean c.f.u. for each age group was calculated by

    dividing the total c.f.u. count by the number of

    individuals sampled in each age category. This was

    further adjusted (adjusted c.f.u.) by limiting the max-

    imum counts from each contact plate to 100. Overall,

    the anova indicated a significant difference among the

    age groups for both the mean c.f.u. (F [5,238]0/7.714;

    PB/0.0001) and the adjusted c.f.u. (F [5,239]0/9.997;

    PB/0.0001). The mean c.f.u. in AG-1 and AG-II was

    significantly lower than in AG-III and AG-VI. Simi-

    larly, the adjusted c.f.u. in AG-I and AG-II was

    significantly lower than in AG-III, IV, V and VI. (Table

    1).

    Colony forming units from different body sites and variation

    among age groups

    Table 2 summarizes the data for mean c.f.u. from each

    age group and different body sites. We conducted a

    multivariate anova, using c.f.u. scores (both adjusted

    and unadjusted) from scalp, forehead, chest and back

    as dependent variables. A significant difference was

    found between age groups when all body parts were

    considered as an optimally weighted composite for

    both adjusted c.f.u. (F [20,952]0/2.486; PB/0.0001)

    and unadjusted c.f.u. (F [20,952]0/2.522; PB/0.0001).

    Based on a pairwise comparison of means from

    different age groups, the mean c.f.u. on the scalp,

    back, and chest of individuals in AG-III and VI were

    significantly higher than the counts for individuals in

    AG-I and II (Table 2).

    Interaction between age and sex

    There was no significant difference in the number of

    men and women sampled for each of the age groups

    (Table 1; x2 [5]0/3.5; P0/0.6). While the main effect of

    sex was not significant, the interaction between age and

    sex was significant with women in AG-V and VI having

    significantly lower mean c.f.u. than men. (F [5,233]0/

    2.554; PB/0.05). The same trend was noted for the

    forehead (P0/0.02) and the chest (P0/0.006).

    Table 1 Malassezia colony forming units (c.f.u.) from contact plate samples of individuals from different age groups

    Age group Age (years) No.

    individuals

    sampled (M/F)

    No. positive for

    Malassezia (%)

    No. negative for

    Malassezia (%)

    Total

    c.f.u.

    count

    Mean c.f.u.

    (standard

    error)

    Adjusted c.f.u.

    (standard

    error)

    Tukeys

    HSD**

    I 0/3 33 (15/18) 12 (36.3) 21 (63.6)* 228 6.9 (4.0) 6.1 (3.3) IB/III, IV, V, VIII 4/14 55 (27/28) 20 (36.3) 35 (63.6)* 466 8.5 (3.3) 8.2 (3.1) IIB/III, IV, V, VI

    III 15/25 43 (18/25) 39 (90.7) 4 (9.3) 2000 47.6 (8.5) 38.3 (5.8) III!/I, II

    IV 26/40 40 (14/26) 36 (90) 4 (10) 1427 35.7 (6.0) 33.8 (5.2) IV!/I, II

    V 41/60 44 (17/27) 37 (84.1) 7 (15.9) 1502 34.1 (20.7) 27.3 (5.4) V!/I, II

    VI Over 60 30 (16/14) 28 (93.3) 2 (6.7) 2233 74.4 (113.2) 45.7 (7.4) VI!/I, II

    *Represent values of statistical significance where significantly less growth was observed than would be expected due to chance alone. **Tukeys

    HSD was computed, in the post hoc testing of the mean scores to do a pairwise comparison of adjusted means from different age groups.

    M/F: Males/Females.

    2004 ISHAM, Medical Mycology, 42, 35/42

    Variation of Malasseziaspecies with age and body site 37

  • 7/30/2019 13693780310001610056

    4/8

    Association of Malassezia species with different age groups

    and body sites

    All six known lipophilic Malassezia species were

    recovered (Table 3). In many individuals, more than

    one Malassezia species was recovered from any given

    body site. Different Malassezia species were recoveredamongst the different colonies picked from the same

    plate from a given body site. We did not find any

    evidence of mixed colonies containing more than one

    species. The most common species were M. sympodialis

    (56.9%) and M. globosa (31.8%) followed by M. furfur

    (6.1%), M. slooffiae (2.7%), M. obtusa (1.8%), and M.

    restricta (0.7%).

    The distributions of M. sympodialis and M. globosa

    were significantly different among individuals from

    different age groups (Table 3). In AG-I, M. globosa

    and M. furfur were the predominant species account-

    ing for 54.5% and 36.4%, respectively, of all the species

    recovered. M. furfur was recovered significantly more

    frequently from AG-I members than would be expected

    by chance (PB/0.0001). M. sympodialis on the other

    hand, was not cultured from individuals aged 0/3

    years. In AG-II, again M. globosa was the predominant

    species (59.7%) and occurred more frequently than

    expected by chance alone (PB/0.0001). In AGs III to

    VI, M. sympodialis was observed approximately twice

    as often as M. globosa (Table 3).

    Table 2 Means and standard errors for c.f.u. by age group and body site

    Body site Mean adjusted c.f.u. (standard error) anova Tukeys

    AG-I AG-II AG-III AG-IV AG-V AG-VI F (P)* HSD$

    Scalp 0.6 2.7 4.2 3.1 3.8 11.5 2.67 I, II B/III,VI

    (0.3) (1.4) (1.7) (1.5) (0.9) (5.2) (0.001)

    Forehead 4.4 2.4 5.5 5.0 2.7 12.2 1.3 I, II B/III,VI

    (3.1) (1.6) (2.1) (2.0) (1.3) (7.1) (0.02)Back 0.4 0.9 17.4 15.3 14.4 26.9 4.004 I, II B/III, VI

    (0.2) (1.5) (3.7) (3.5) (3.7) (5.5) (0.000)

    Chest 1.6 2.5 19.6 12.4 13.2 23.7 7.24 I, IIB/III, VI

    (1.0) (1.7) (5.7) (3.6) (4.2) (8.3) (0.000)

    *F-statistics for univariate anova calculations with unadjusted c.f.u. as a variable; P-value in parentheses represent the probability value of

    statistical significance. $Tukeys honestly significant difference (HSD) was computed in the post hoc testing of the mean scores to do a pairwise

    comparison of means from different age groups.

    Table 3 Distribution of Malassezia species in individuals from different age groups

    Characteristics AG-I AG-II AG-III AG-IV AG-V AG-VI Total

    No. individuals sampled 33 55 43 40 44 30 245

    No. individuals that cultured

    positive for Malassezia spe-

    cies

    12 20 39 36 37 28 172

    No. colonies examined 22 57 161 143 155 123 661

    No. individuals with positive

    species identification for

    yeast colonies.

    5 13 33 27 29 27 134

    No. species identified 3 4 5 6 5 5 6

    Malassezia species No. colonies (% of total number of colonies for stated age group)

    [No. individuals from whom species isolated]*

    M. furfur 8(36.4%) [1] 3(5.3%) [3] 5(3.1%) [4] 2(1.4%) [2] 11(7.1%) [7] 11(8.9%) [4] 40{6.1}$

    M. globosa 12(54.5%) [5] 34(59.7%) [11] 41(25.5%) [17] 42(29.4%) [3] 52(33.5%) [17] 29(23.6%) [13] 210{31.8%}

    M. obtusa 0 2(3.5%) [2] 4(2.5%) [3] 1(0.07%) [1] 2(1.3%) [1] 3(2.4%) [2] 12{1.8%}

    M. restricta 0 0 2(1.2%) [2] 3(2.1%) [2] 0 0 5{0.7%}M. slooffiae 2(9.1%) [1] 0 0 3(2.1%) [3] 3(1.9%) [3] 10(8.1%) [2] 18{2.7%}

    M. sympodialis 0 18(31.6%) [6] 109(67.7%) [28] 92(64.3%) [26] 87(56.1%) [24] 70(56.9%) [19] 376{56.9%}

    Total 22 57 161 143 155 123 661

    *In some individuals more than one colony was isolated. $Percent of total number of colonies (n0/661).

    2004 ISHAM, Medical Mycology, 42, 35/42

    38 Gupta and Kohli

  • 7/30/2019 13693780310001610056

    5/8

    All correlations of Malassezia species with body site

    were more prominent after combining the data across

    age groups (Table 4). For all age groups combined, M.

    globosa was recovered significantly more often from

    scalp and forehead and less frequently from the back

    (PB/0.0001). M. sympodialis, on the other hand, was

    recovered more frequently from the back and less

    frequently from the scalp and forehead (PB/0.0001).

    Discussion

    This is the first study that evaluates the type and

    amount of Malassezia species in the different age

    groups using the new taxonomy. The results of our

    study replicate and expand on the findings of some of

    the earlier studies [9,14,19/22]. While our results and

    those of investigators using the old taxonomy show

    similarities in the number of yeasts found in different

    age groups, caution should be used in any attempts to

    compare the species-level results generated using the

    two classification systems.

    Another factor that makes it difficult to generalize

    among studies is the different sampling procedures

    used. While we have used contact plates in this study,

    other studies have used skin scrapings [23] or tape

    samples [24], the detergent scrub technique [25] and

    even contact plates (with either Leeming/Notman [26]

    or a different medium) [27]. Aspiroz [20] used a cotton

    ball impregnated with 1 ml TritonX-100 and Naka-

    bayashi et al. [14] used several methods: swab, tape and

    Table 4 Prevalence of Malassezia species on body sites of members of different age groups

    Malassezia species AG-I AG-II AG-III AG-IV AG-V AG-VI Total

    M. furfur

    Scalp / / / / 3 3 6

    Forehead 3 1 / 1 1 / 6

    Chest 2 / 2 1 3 4 12

    Back 3 2 3 1 4 3 16

    Total 8* 3 5 3$ 11 10

    M. globosa

    Scalp 4 16 9 6 16 8 59*

    Forehead 4 9 9 11 16 3 52*

    Chest 3 5 13 18 7 6 52

    Back 1 4 10 7 11 8 41$

    Total 12 34* 41 42 50 25

    M. obtusa

    Scalp / 1 2 / / 2 5

    Forehead / / 2 / / / 2

    Chest / 1 / 1 2 1 5

    Back / / / / / / 0$

    Total 0 2 4 1 2 3

    M. restricta

    Scalp / / / 1 / / 1

    Forehead / / / 1 / / 1

    Chest / / 1 / / / 1

    Back / / 1 / / / 1

    Total 0 0 2 2 0 0

    M. slooffiae

    Scalp / / / 1 / 5 6

    Forehead / / / / 1 / 1

    Chest / / / / 1 / 1

    Back 2 / / 2 1 4 9

    Total 2 0 0 3 3 9*

    M. sympodialis

    Scalp / 2 14 4 8 9 37$

    Forehead / 3 13 6 7 8 37$

    Chest / 7 44 38 28 15 132Back / 6 38 44 44 35 167*

    Total 0$ 18$ 109 92 87 67

    *Based on the standardized residual scores by computing z-test, a significantly greater number of cases than expected were observed. $Based on

    the standardized residual scores by computing z-test, a significantly lower number of cases than expected were observed.

    2004 ISHAM, Medical Mycology, 42, 35/42

    Variation of Malasseziaspecies with age and body site 39

  • 7/30/2019 13693780310001610056

    6/8

    hairbrush (for scalp). Recently, Gemmer et al. [28] have

    described a new molecular technique named terminal

    fragment length polymorphism (tFLP), which allows

    the molecular detection and differentiation of Malas-

    sezia yeast species from dandruff. Whether this techni-

    que will be helpful in isolating and identifying

    Malassezia yeasts from samples other than dandruff

    remains to be investigated. The tFLP method, however,

    is not suitable for quantitative culturing of yeasts.

    While no studies have been performed comparing the

    contact plates with the detergent scrub technique, an

    animal study has shown a high correlation in yields

    provided by the two methods (PB/0.001) [29]. Contact

    plates were chosen for sampling because: (i) we [3] and

    others [22] have used contact plates successfully for

    quantitative culturing; (ii) the use of a contact plate

    minimizes the chances of losing a part or whole sample

    in the transit from the clinic to the laboratory; and (iii)

    in our experience, this sampling method was found to

    be best tolerated by children.In the various age groups that we have studied, there

    is a difference in both the amount as well as the kind of

    Malassezia species found on the skin. The two young-

    est age groups, representing individuals from 0 to 3 and

    4 to 14 years of age, had significantly lower mean c.f.u.

    (6.12 and 8.20, respectively; mean adjusted c.f.u.) than

    groups III through VI. Our study shows some striking

    similarities and differences when contrasted with a

    study by Bergbrant and Broberg [7], who also used

    contact plates (containing peptone, ox bile, bacto agar,

    glucose and yeast extract supplemented with glycerol,

    glycerol monostearate, Tween 60 and cows milk) to

    investigate the prevalence of P. ovale in childrenbetween 2 months and 15 years of age. The colony

    counts in our two youngest age groups were similar to

    those of Bergbrant and Broberg [7]. They reported a

    mean c.f.u. of 10 for children between the ages of 2 and

    7 years; in our study the mean c.f.u. were 6.9 and 8.5 for

    AG I and II, respectively. Our results however, differ

    from those of Bergbrant and Broberg [7] in the number

    of individuals who sampled positive for Malassezia in

    younger age groups (0/14 years). In our study, while a

    positive culture was obtained from 70% of individuals

    sampled over all age groups, only 36.3% of individuals

    of younger ages (0/14 years) were positive for Malas-

    sezia , which is in contrast with the 87% positive

    recovery rate observed by Bergbrant and Broberg [7].

    Several other studies have reported varied rates of

    positive recovery from young children. Faergemann

    and Fredrickson [4] found no Malassezia (P. orbicu-

    lare/P.ovale) yeasts on children younger than 5 years of

    age. Results of our study are closest to those of Silva et

    al. [19], who found Malassezia yeasts in 23.3% of

    children between the ages of 0 and 18 months and

    26.7% of children between the ages of 11 and 15 years.

    Because of the different ways in which subjects were

    grouped according to age, comparison between these

    studies is difficult. With the exception of the study by

    Bergbrant and Broberg [7], in which the amount of

    Malassezia species recovered from the skin of children

    is quite high, other studies, including ours, show that

    amount of Malassezia inoculum recoverable from

    children is quite low. This may reflect the fact that

    compared to other age groups, children have very little

    sebum on their skin [16]. Both the amount and the

    composition [16] of skin lipids changes at puberty.

    With respect to the carriage of Malassezia species in

    adolescents and adults, our study found no significant

    difference between the four age groups (AG-III to AG-

    VI). It is thought that the increase in skin lipid levels

    that occurs at puberty may be responsible for the

    increase in colonization of the skin by Malassezia

    species [4]. A previous study [9] reported that there wasa decrease in Malassezia species colonization with

    increasing age, with 30-year-olds having significantly

    higher mean colony counts than persons aged 40, 50,

    60, 70 or 80 years. By contrast, we found the highest

    mean colony count in our age group VI (93.3%), which

    contained individuals over 60 years of age, though,

    again, differences between the four oldest age groups

    were not significant. It is possible, however, that

    differences in the techniques used to recover Malasse-

    zia species from the skin, i.e., differences between

    detergent scrub [9] and contact plate (present study)

    results, may explain some of the observed differences.

    For the various age groups, there were differencesamong body sites in the mean numbers of c.f.u. found.

    The mean c.f.u. for AG-III and AG/IV were signifi-

    cantly higher than those for AG-I and AG-II for the

    back, chest, scalp and forehead. It is possible that these

    differences are again due to puberty-related change in

    skin lipid levels.

    We also examined the relationship between the six

    lipophilic Malassezia species, age group and body site.

    All six species were recovered; however, the prevalence

    rates were different. Overall, the most common species

    was M. sympodialis (56.8%); M. globosa was the

    second most common (31.7%). There were differences

    in the prevalence of these species among age groups:

    M. globosa was most common in AG-I and AG-II,

    while M. sympodialis was most common in the other

    four groups. The last result confirms an earlier report

    by our group [3], but differs from the findings of other

    studies. Aspiroz et al. [20] reported that M. globosa

    was most frequently observed overall in normal in-

    dividuals; however, M. sympodialis was more prevalent

    2004 ISHAM, Medical Mycology, 42, 35/42

    40 Gupta and Kohli

  • 7/30/2019 13693780310001610056

    7/8

    on the back. Crespo Erchiga et al. [21], from Spain,

    found that M. sympodialis was the most common

    species isolated from normal skin. In Sweden, Sand-

    strom et al. [22] also reported that M. sympodialis was

    frequently recovered from normal volunteers. It is

    possible that climatic factors may play a role in the

    type of Malassezia species present in skin, with M.sympodialis more common in temperate climates and

    M. globosa occurring most frequently in warmer or

    tropical locations.

    The body sites sampled were combined into two

    groups: head (forehead and scalp) and trunk (chest and

    back). M. globosa was found in significantly higher

    proportions than expected (according to the statistical

    null hypothesis) on the head and in significantly lower

    than expected amounts on the trunk. For M. sympo-

    dialis, the reverse was true; this species was recovered

    less often from the head and more frequently from the

    trunk than would be expected by chance (data not

    shown). Taken together, our results indicate that M.sympodialis is overall the most common Malassezia

    species found on normal skin, and that it is most

    frequently recovered from the chest and back. In

    children, Malassezia colonization is more frequent on

    the scalp and forehead than on the trunk, and is carried

    out primarily by M. globosa . However, colonization by

    Malassezia in children up to the age of approximately

    14 years is much less common than in adults. Our

    results indicate that the Malassezia species are not

    interchangeable in their ecological relationships; they

    have varying degrees of niche separation. Differences in

    the amount and composition of skin lipids at different

    ages and different body sites may account for part of

    the variability we found. In addition, hygienic practices

    change with age and with body site, possibly affecting

    the habitat of the yeasts.

    Following the completion of the study two other

    Malassezia species have been reported, one from

    humans and the other from the skin of horses [30,31].

    As our study was carried out before these characteriza-

    tions were published, we did not examine for the

    presence of these yeasts.

    References

    1 Midgley G. The lipophilic yeasts: state of the art and prospects.

    Med Mycol 2000; 38(Suppl. 1): 9/16.

    2 Roberts SOB. Pityrosporum orbiculare : incidence and distribution

    on clinically normal skin. Br J Dermatol 1969; 81: 264/269.

    3 Gupta AK, Kohli Y, Summerbell RC, Faergemann J. Quantitative

    culture of Malassezia species from different body sites of

    individuals with or without dermatoses. Med Mycol 2001; 39:

    243/351.

    4 Faegemann J, Fredrikson T. Age incidence of Pityrosporum

    orbiculare on human skin. Acta Derm Venereol 1980; 60: 531/

    533.

    5 Noble WE, Midgley G. Scalp carriage of Pityrosporum species:

    the effect of physiological maturity, sex and race. Sabouraudia

    1978; 16: 229/232.

    6 Leeming JP, Sutton TM, Fleming PJ. Neonatal skin as a reservoir

    of Malassezia species. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1995; 14: 719/721.

    7 Bergbrant I-M, Broberg A. Pityrosporum ovale culture from theforehead of healthy children. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1994;

    74: 260/261.

    8 Faergemann J, Aly R, Maibach HI. Quantitative variations in

    distribution of Pityrosporum orbiculare on clinically normal skin.

    Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1983; 63: 346/348.

    9 Bergbrant I-M, Faergemann J. Variations of Pityrosporum

    orbiculare in Middle-aged and elderly individuals. Acta Derm

    Venereol (Stockh) 1988; 68: 537/540.

    10 Sloof WC. Pityrosporum Sabouraud. In: Lodder J (ed.). The

    Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publish-

    ing, 1970: 1167/1186.

    11 Fell JW, Boekhout T, Fonseca A, Scorzetti G, Statzell-Tallman A.

    Biodiversity and systematics of basidiomycetous yeasts as deter-

    mined by large-subunit rDNA D1/D2 domain sequence analysis.

    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50: 1351/1371.12 Simmonds RB, Gueho E. A new species of Malassezia. Mycol

    Res 1990; 94: 1146/1149.

    13 Gueho E, Midgley G, Guillot J. The genus Malassezia with

    description of four new species. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 1996;

    69: 337/355.

    14 Nakabayashi A, Sei Y, Guillot J. Identification of Malassezia

    species isolated from patients with seborrheic dermatitis, atopic

    dermatitis, pityriasis versicolor and normal subjects. Med Mycol

    2000; 38: 337/341.

    15 Sansone-Bazzano G, Cummings B, Seeler AK, Reisner RM.

    Differences in the lipid constituents of sebum from pre-pubertal

    and pubertal subjects. Br J Dermatol 1980; 103: 131/137.

    16 Downing DT, Steward ME, Strauss JS. Changes in sebum

    secretion and the sebaceous gland. Clin Geriatr Med 1989; 5:

    109/114.17 Guillot J, Gueho E, Lesourd M, et al . Identification of

    Malassezia species: a practical approach. J Mycol Med 1996; 6:

    103/110.

    18 Gupta AK, Kohli Y, Summerbell RC. Molecular differentiation of

    seven Malassezia species. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38: 1869/1875.

    19 Silva V, Di Tilla C, Fischman O. Skin colonization by Malassezia

    furfur in healthy children up to 15 years old. Mycopathologia

    1995/6; 132: 143/145.

    20 Aspiroz C, Moreno LA, Rezusta A, Rubio C. Differentiation of

    three biotypes of Malassezia species on human normal skin.

    Correspondence with M. globosa , M. sympodialis and M.

    restricta. Mycopathologia 1999; 145: 69/74.

    21 Crespo Erchiga V, Ojeda Martos A, Vera Casano A, Crespo

    Erchiga A, Sanchez Rajardo F. Aislamiento e identificacion de

    Malassezia spp. en pitiriasis versicolor, dermatitis seborreica y pielsana. Rev Iberoamer Micol 1999; 16: S16/S21.

    22 Sandstrom MH, Bartosik J, Back O et al. The prevalence of the

    Malassezia yeasts in patients with atopic dermatitis, seborrheic

    dermatitis and healthy controls. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venerol

    2001; 15 (Suppl. 2): 104/274 (Abstract).

    23 Heng MCY, Henderson CL, Barker DC, Haberfelde G. Correla-

    tion of Pityosporum ovale density with clinical severity of

    seborrheic dermatitis as assessed by a simplified technique. J Am

    Acad Dermatol 1990; 23: 82/86.

    2004 ISHAM, Medical Mycology, 42, 35/42

    Variation of Malasseziaspecies with age and body site 41

  • 7/30/2019 13693780310001610056

    8/8

    24 Wikler JR, de Haan P, Nieboer C. The Tape-method: A new and

    simple method for quantitative culture of Pityrosporum yeasts.

    Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1988; 68: 445/449.

    25 Faergemann J. Quantitative culture ofPityrosporon orbiculare. Int

    J Dermatol 1984; 23: 330/333.

    26 Leeming JP, Notman FH. Improved methods for isolation and

    enumeration of Malassezia furfur from human skin. J Clin

    Microbiol 1987; 25: 2017/2019.

    27 Bergbrant IM, Igerud A, Nordin P. An improved method forquantitative culture of Malassezia furfur. Res Microbiol 1992;

    143: 731/735.

    28 Gemmer CM, De Angelis YM, Theelen B, Boekhout T, Dawson

    TL Jr. Fast, noninvasive method for molecular detection and

    differentiation of Malassezia species on human skin and applica-

    tion of the method to dandruff microbiology. J Clin Microbiol

    2002; 40: 3350/3357.

    29 Bond R, Lloyd DH, Plummer JH. Evaluation of a detergent scrub

    technique for the quantitative culture of Malassezia pachyderma-

    tis from canine skin. Res Vet Sci 1995; 58: 133/137.

    30 Sugita T, Takashima M, Shinoda T, et al. A new yeast species

    Malassezia dermatis isolated from patients with atopic dermatitis.

    J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 1363/1367.

    31 Nell A, James SA, Bond CJ, Hunt B, Herrtage ME. Identification

    and distribution of a novel Malassezia species yeast on normal

    equine skin. Veter Rec 2002; 150: 395/398.

    2004 ISHAM, Medical Mycology, 42, 35/42

    42 Gupta and Kohli