Upload
gsc123456
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Rocking seismic isolation
Citation preview
1
Rocking Seismic Isolation of Bridges Supported by Spread Foundation
基礎ロッキング免震
Kazuhiko KawashimaTokyo Institute of Technology
Requirements of Foundations in Seismic Design基礎の耐震設計の要件
Bearing capacity耐力
Sliding渇動
Rocking転倒
Static Seismic Design
Dynamic Response
Sliding + Rocking
Rocking + Jump
Requirements for Rocking Responsein the Static Design静的な転倒照査
aB eVMe <=
⎩⎨⎧=
6/3/
ll
ea
Eccentricity偏心率
Allowable Eccentricity
Static
Static+Seismic
Bearing Capacity耐力
aB q
lbM
lbVq <+= 2max
6
eEccentricity
l
V
bmaxq
BM
Akashi Strait BridgeThe World Longest Bridge
In the static design, overturning was the major factor for sizing those foundations
Is it true that such a large foundation overturns under a seismic excitation??
MassNatural periodFrequency content of a ground motion
Overturning of Foundation-Tower System of Akashi Straight Bridge明石海峡大橋の耐震設計
Static Analysis on Overturning of Foundation-Tower System was eliminated from seismic design
This is because static overturning analysis is unrealistic
Decision of design was made based on nonlinear dynamic response analysis and a preliminary static design based on critical velocity which results in overturning
2
Rion Antirion Bridge, Greece
Courtesy of Dr. Alain Pecker
Seismic Rocking Isolation
Concept of Rocking Isolation of RionAnti-Rion Bridge
Fault dislocation as large as 2 m is anticipated although the location of fault is not known.
Rocking isolation reduces bridge response.
Rion Antirion Bridge
Requirements for Rocking Responsein the Static Design
Start to Uplift
Fθ
BMV
Static Equilibrium
Fsv Ground
Uplifted at the Left
Fθ
BMV
x
Separation
Nonlinear Interaction between a Column Plastic Hinge and a Foundation
Plastic deformation of a column
Rocking response of a foundation
3
Plastic Hinge
Vertical Displacement
Subgrade Reaction
Compression
Tension
Uplift of Foundation
Analytical Idealization
Fsv 4.5m
12m
7m
2m6.5m
N-Value500
Sand
Gravels
Bridge Analyzed Designed based on the static design method assuming 0.2g response acceleration
SA
(m/s
ec2
)
Ground Accelerations Subjected to Bridge
JMA Kobe (NS)
Takatori Station (NS)
50
0.5
1.5
1.0
0
Response Displacement
Response Acceleration
0
10
20
30
50Natural Period (s)
Time (s)0 10 20
-10
0
-10
SD
(m/s
ec2
)
Natural Period (s)
Acc
eler
ation
(m/s
ec2
)
0 10 20-10
0
-10
Acc
eler
ation
(m/s
ec2
)
Time (s)
1995 Kobe, Japan earthquake
-10-505
10
Acc
eler
atio
n (m
/s2 )
-10-505
10
Acc
eler
atio
n (m
/s2 )
-0.3
0
0.3
Dis
pl(m
)-0.01
00.01
Dis
pl (m
)
-0.010
0.01
0 10 20 30
Rot
atio
n
Time (sec)
(rad
)
Seismic Response of the Bridge When Supported by Soil Springs Which Resist Tension一般の解析
Deck Acceleration
Footing Acceleration
Deck Displacement
Footing Displacement
Footing Rotation
ch
Fθ
pcθ
fhpL
Contribution of Footing Displacement and Column Displacement to Deck Response桁の応答変位には何が寄与するか?
FD uu =
)( fcF hh ++θ
)2
( pcpcL
h −+θ
Cfu+
Contribution of Footing Rotation to the Deck Displacement
)2
()( pcpccffcFFDL
huhhuu −++++= θθ
-0.01
0
0.01
0 10 20 30
Rot
atio
n
Time (sec)
(rad
)
Footing Rotation
Deck Displacement
ch Fθ
Fθ
pcθ
Contribution by Footing Rotation
fhpL
Du
-0.3
0
0.3
Dis
pl(m
)
4
Footing Rotation
Effect of the Uplift of Foundation基礎浮き上がりの影響
-0.3
0
0.3
Dis
pl(m
)
-0.3
0
0.3
Dis
pl(m
)
-0.02
0
0.02
0 10 20 30
Rot
atio
n
Time (sec)
(rad
) Footing Rotation
Deck DisplacementDeck Displacement
Underlying ground resists tension
Separations are allowedbetween footing and underlying ground
-0.02
0
0.02
0 10 20 30
Rot
atio
n
Time (sec)
(rad
)
Uplift of the Foundation from the Underlying Ground基礎はどれだけ浮き上
がるか?
-0.1
0
0.1
0 10 20 30
Dis
pl (m
)
Uplift
Downward
Time (s)
UpliftVertical Reaction
-5
0
0 10 20 30Ver
tical
Rea
ctio
n(M
N)
Time (s)
0
10
20
Tim
e (s
)
Distance (m)-3.25 3.250
Separations between the Foundation andthe Underlying Ground基礎の浮き上がり量の時間履歴
Peak Subgrade Reaction under the Footing基礎底面の最大反力
-4
-2
0
Max
For
ce
Distanance from the Center of the Footing (m)
0-3.25 3.25
(MPa
)
mm
Effect of local softening
Effect of yield of the underlying ground
Moment vs. Rotation Relation of the Foundation
∫ ⋅= 2/ 2* )(lX svF dxxxkK θ
∫ ⋅= −2/2/
2)(ll svF dxxxkK θ
)(xksv
x
l )(xksv
x
l
*Xx =
Underlying ground resists tension
Separations are allowedbetween the footing and the underlying ground
Moment vs. Rotation of the Footing曲げモーメント~回転角の履歴
-60
0
60
-0.02 0 0.02
Mom
ent (
MN
m)
Rotation (rad)
)(xksv
x
)(xksv
x
-60
0
60
-0.02 -0.01 0 0.01 0.02
Mom
ent (
MN
m)
Rotation (rad)
5
Column and Foundation Interaction
-40
0
40
-0.02 0 0.02
Mom
ent (
MN
m)
Curvature (1/m)
-40
0
40
-0.02 0 0.02M
omen
t (M
Nm
)Curvature (1/m)
-60
0
60
-0.02 0 0.02Rotation (rad)
Mom
ent (
MN
m)
-60
0
60
-0.02 0 0.02Rotation (rad)
Mom
ent (
MN
m)
Underlying ground resists tension
Separations of the footing from the underlying ground
-10
0
10
20
0 10 20 30Acc
eler
atio
n (m
/s2 )
Time (s)
Collision between the Footing and the Underlying Ground基礎底面と地
盤表面には衝突が起こる
-10
0
10
20
30
40
0 10 20 30
Acc
eler
atio
n (m
/s2 )
Time (s)
-10
0
10
20
0 10 20 30Acc
eler
atio
n (m
/s2 )
Time (s)
Effect of Bilateral Excitation2方向
載荷の影響Moment vs. Rotation Hysteresis of the Foundation
Effect of Yield of Underlying Ground基礎底面地盤が降伏すると、どうなるか?
Vertical reaction
Vertical displacement vs. stress Vertical displacement