Upload
walt
View
23
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A model for Collaboration between the statutory and NGO sectors. Christchurch. What are the immediate concerns? What would you do next?. Christchurch – Our response. Based ourselves at Marae – community presence Weekend adventures 1-1 and group mentoring School based support work - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
A MODEL FOR COLLABORATION
BETWEEN THE STATUTORY AND NGO SECTORS
CHRISTCHURCH
What are the immediate concerns?What would you do next?
CHRISTCHURCH – OUR RESPONSE Based ourselves at Marae – community
presence Weekend adventures 1-1 and group mentoring School based support work Re connection with our local and regional
networks – where are they all?
CONTEXT Following the Christchurch earthquakes, a
number of agencies were left ‘homeless’.
A hub was formed at Nga Hau E Wha National Marae.
CYF have long spoken about high and complex workloads that can become slowed by volumes of referrals that do not necessarily fit with the design of the service
TE PUNA WHAIORA - WHO ARE WE? Building Resiliency, moving children from
pain to promise and from isolation to connection.
Vulnerable children and families Children aged 5-12 years Identified areas of need in health, welfare or
education. Maori and Pacific Island, rurally or socially
isolated children
RELATIONSHIPS Te Puna Whaiora hold a number of contracts
with CYF, including:- Home for Life- Kidzacool and CYF partnership camps- Partnered response- Social workers in Schools- Building resiliency services
GREEN PAPER Sharing responsibility Showing leadership Child-centered practice changes Child-centered policy changes
STATISTICS Child, Youth and Family confirmed 21,000 cases of
abuse and neglect in 2009/10 Over 30,000 students are truant from schools on
any given day 7,342 school leavers left with no qualification in
2009 13,315 hospital admissions in 2008/09 were for
children under five that could have been avoided. In the same year, 1,286 admissions for all children were as a result of assault, neglect or maltreatment
47,374 children (aged 0–16) were present, or usually residing with the victim, at an incident of family violence reported to the Police in 2010.
(p. 6)
QUESTIONS? How can the Government’s frontline
services better connect vulnerable children and their families and whānau with the services they need?
What services could be included in this action to better connect vulnerable children to the services they need?
What other changes do you think could be made to ensure vulnerable children are connected to the services from which they would benefit? (p. 29)
PURPOSE What we were trying to achieve:
- ease of access for vulnerable families that need support.
- relationship building between sectors- resource building- increased awareness of role in the community- supporting community/sector
understanding of CYF duties and mandates
ACTION Social workers from TPW went out on duty
calls with CYF ‘triage’ meetings between supervisors and
TPW to identify families that may meet criteria for TPW services.
OUTCOMES Where appropriate families were able to
engage with their TPW worker right from the start
CYF were able to close cases in the knowledge appropriate services were in place.
Families had significantly quicker access to TPW services then if they had gone the DR pathway.
Increased understanding of roles Supportive collaboration and relationships
between services and families. Practice support. “A way forward” consultation document
CHALLENGES Role clarity and boundaries Reciprocity Buy-in “Third Wheel” syndrome Gaps in knowledge
LINKS TO GREEN PAPER OUTCOMES Share responsibility- Reducing caseloads- Early intervention- Child centered practices- Information sharing and collaboration
between agencies.- Expansion of support services
LINKS TO GREEN PAPER OUTCOMES Show Leadership- Government action plan (access to services)- Reporting of outcomes- Partnerships and culturally relevant services- Connection to services (reducing barriers)
LINKS TO GREEN PAPER OUTCOMES Make child-centered policy changes- Targeting vulnerable children- Early intervention- Evidence based policy- Prioritizing families and services- Monitoring of children- Information sharing
LINKS TO GREEN PAPER OUTCOMES Make child-centered practice changes- Collaboration- Support and training- Reducing barriers to services- Raising awareness of services
WHAT NEXT Training Education supports Potential for city wide roll out and increase of
staff
WHAT NEXT FOR CHRISTCHURCH What do you think the current issues for the
community are?
How can government and NGO sectors continue to build their collaboration and meet the needs of vulnerable families in this context?
REFERENCES Ministry of Social Development. (2011). The
Green Paper for Vulnerable Children. Every child thrives, belongs, achieves. Wellington.
Ministry of Social Development. (2012). The Green Paper for Vulnerable Children. Complete Summary of Submissions. Wellington.
Ministry of Social Development. (2012). Child Youth and Family Christchurch. A Way Forward. Christchurch.