Upload
clarence-jubb
View
216
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Are the New Public Servants
Ordinary People, Too?
Hun Myoung ParkJames L. Perry
(Indiana University)
August 10, 2009
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2009
2
Outline New Public Servants Literature Review
Goodsell (1983) Lewis (1990) Bureau Voting Model
Classification of Public Services Data and Methods Results Conclusion
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2009
3
New Public Servants New Governance For-profit and nonprofit employees providing
public services Do bureaucrats differ from the general public? Do new public servants differ from bureaucrats
and other private employees?
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2009
4
Literature Review Paul Appleby (1945), Big Democracy Frederick Mosher (1968), Democracy and the
Public Service Charles Goodsell (1983), The Case for
Bureaucracy: A Public Administration Polemic
Paul Light (1999), The New Public Service
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2009
5
Charles Goodsell (1983) Bureaucrats policy views are far more diverse
than homogenous Little evidence for “bureaucratic mentality” Bureaucrats generally well adjusted, not
alienated and powerless Bureaucrats not as despised as the media
stereotype
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2009
6
Gregory Lewis (1990) Views similar to average citizens on
government spending Secular humanists in terms of traditional
values (e.g., sex, sex roles, race) Rejects the “oppressed-bureaucrat thesis” Bureaucrats are ordinary people
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2009
7
Bureau Voting Model Bureau information monopoly (Niskanen
1971) Self-interested budget maximizers
Bureau voting model (Garand et al. 1991) More supportive of government spending More likely to vote More supportive of candidates favoring
spending
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2009
8
Classification of Public Services Using Standard Industrial Classification
1980 SIC (2000-2006) Public services versus non-public services Service providers
Government (including USPS) For-profit Nonprofit: social/health/education
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2009
9
Classification of Public ServicesPublic Non-public
Government Public administration, USPS NA
For-profit Railroad, Bus services, water transportation, air transportation, communications, utility and sanitary services, noncommercial educational and scientific research
Agriculture, mining, construction, manufacturing, wholesale, retail, finance, business, taxicab, trucking service, theaters and motion pictures, bowling alleys, billiard, etc.
Nonprofit Social services (welfare), health services, education services, museums, art galleries and zoos
Membership, religious organizations
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2009
10
Data and Methods General Social Survey (2000-2006) Dependent variables: government spending,
confidence in institutions, voting for Republicans, morality and tolerance, reward preferences, social capital, sex/religion, world view
Covariates: education, political ideology, family income, prestige of jobs, age, gender, race
T-test, ordinary least squares, binary logit model to compare groups
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2009
11
Result: Government Spending
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2009
12
Result: Government Spending
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2009
13
Result: Government Spending
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2009
14
Result: Government Spending Government bureaucrats more supportive of
military/armaments/defense programs Nonprofit employees more supportive of welfare
spending, condition of blacks, social security; budget and spending maximizers?
No significant difference in environment, health, crime, city problem, drug, and foreign aid
Close similarity between bureaucrats and for-profit public services employees (new public servants)
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2009
15
Confidence in Institutions Similar to the general public (Federal government,
Supreme Court, Congress, press, banks, scientific community, organized labor, TV, medicine)
Bureaucrats slightly higher in scientific community and lower in organized labor than private employees
Nonprofit public servants slightly higher confidence in education institutions and lower in major companies and military than ordinary people
Close similarity between government bureaucrats and for-profit public services employees
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2009
16
Voting for Republicans Government bureaucrats more likely than private
employees to vote for Republicans; new public servants do not differ from ordinary people
Voting: government and education employees > other new public servants > ordinary people
Nonprofit employees more Democratic than government and for-profit employees
Nonprofit employees more supportive of needy Americans than government and for-profit employees: budget and spending maximizers?
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2009
17
Morality and Tolerance Similar in morality and tolerance as a whole Nonprofit employees less supportive of death penalty
and euthanasia than government and for-profit counterparts, and more supportive of making pornography illegal than ordinary people.
Government and for-profit employees higher tolerance (allowing racists and anti-democratic people to speak) than ordinary people, and more likely than nonprofit employees to allow homosexualists
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2009
18
Reward Preferences New public servants more satisfied with jobs than
government employees and ordinary people Government and nonprofit public services have
higher job security than for-profit counterparts Social/health services less financially satisfied but
motivated by mission and intrinsic factors For-profit public services employees put more value
on high income and job security, but less on the feeling of accomplishment than nonprofit employees
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2009
19
Social Capital Slightly higher perceptions about helpfulness,
fairness, and trust than ordinary people Government bureaucrats more altruistic and affiliated
with organizations than ordinary people Nonprofit employees higher empathy than
government and for-profit counterparts. Similar in social evening with relatives, friends, etc. Government and nonprofit employees less likely to
go to a bar than for-profit counterparts.
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2009
20
Sex, Religion, World View Government and for-profit public services employees
do no differ in perceptions about sex, religion, and world view from ordinary people
Education employees more tolerant of homosexuality than government employees and ordinary people, but less of premarital sex
Nonprofit employees more frequently attend religious services and tend to be strong believers than government employees and ordinary people
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2009
21
Conclusion Both bureaucrats and new public servants are
ordinary people as a whole For-profit public service employees are similar
to government respondents, but more sensitive to monetary incentive and less intrinsically motivated. Effect of privatization?
Nonprofit public services employees are more sympathetic, ethical, religious; intrinsically motivated; female dominated
Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2009
22
Questions and Suggestions?