ASIA PACIFIC THIRD-SECTOR RESEARCHERS NETWORK … · Nonprofits are strategically using social media to disseminate information, engage with community, and mobilize activities. The

1

ASIA PACIFIC THIRD-SECTOR RESEARCHERS NETWORK NEWSLETTER

亞太地區第三部門研究人員網絡通信

Issue 2 / February 2020

EDITOR’S NOTE | 編輯按

As we are drafting this note and the newsletter, the Coronavirus epidemic is finally slowing down this week, at least in mainland China. But, much uncertainty is ahead and the outbreak of the virus in Iran, Korea and Italy has alerted researchers of the field that this might mark a new era of global health crisis. If you are aware of, or writing up, good working papers on how the Third-sector and civil society actors are involved in facing the challenge of the coronavirus in the Asia-Pacific region, please send us an email and share with us the research findings. The coronavirus epidemic will lead to more research on philanthropy in China and Asia in general, the need and capacity of non-state actors and social organizations are more present in times of crisis.

In this newsletter, we share with you the abstracts of a special issue on Global Chinese Philanthropy published by the China Nonprofit Review.

Fengshi and Qianjin

CONTENTS | 目錄

Editor’s Note 編輯按

Core Academic Journals 核心學術期刊

VOLUNTAS Volume 31, Issue 1, February 2020

The China Nonprofit Review Volume 11, Issue 2, December 2019

Publications/News/Reports in the Sector

部門出版/新聞/報告推介

Call for Papers 論文徵集

Job Vacancy 職位空缺

Contact Us 聯絡我們

About Us 關於我們

2

CORE ACADEMIC JOURNALS | 核心學術期刊

VOLUNTAS Volume 31, Issue 1, February 2020

I Selected Abstracts | 精選摘要

Online or Offline? Nonprofits’ Choice and Use of Social Media in Hong Kong | 線上還是線下？香港非營

利組織對社交媒體的選擇和使用

Wai Fung Lam, Lin Nie

Abstract: Nonprofits are strategically using social media to disseminate information, engage with community, and mobilize activities. The use of social media has attracted increasing academic discussion in the recent years. By challenging the proposition that online presence is always beneficial to nonprofits, we argue that seeking an online presence is itself a strategic choice; social environment as well as resource dependence would fairly affect nonprofits’ decision either to join the cyber world or just stay offline. Based on analysis of 427 social service nonprofit organizations in Hong Kong, we find that nonprofits that depend on private funding are more likely to use social media, while those depend on government funding are less likely to appear online. We further examine the nonprofits’ activeness and effectiveness of social media using, and find that informational posts generate the most “likes,” while actional posts are more likely to be diffused through “shares.”

摘要：非營利組織在策略性地使用社交媒體來傳播信息，與社區互動並動員活動。近年來，社交媒體的使用吸引

了越來越多的學術討論。通過質疑線上傳播總是對非營利組織有利的這一主張，我們認為尋求線上傳播本身只是

一種策略選擇；社會環境還有資源依賴將對非營利組織加入網絡世界還是保持線下狀態的決策有很大的影響。基

於對香港 427 個社會服務非營利組織的分析，我們發現，依賴於私人資金的非營利組織更可能使用社交媒體。

而那些依賴於政府資金的則更少可能的出現在網絡上。我們進一步研究了非營利組織使用社交媒體的主動性和有

效性，我們發現信息發布能帶來最多的 “贊” ，而行動發布更可能通過 “分享” 傳播。

II Contents | 當期目錄

1. Civil Society Organizations: the Site of Legitimizing the Common Good—a Literature Review 公民社會組織：使共同利益合法化的地方 – 一個文獻綜述 Liv Egholm, Liesbet Heyse, Damien Mourey

2. Civil Society Meta-organizations and Legitimating Processes: the Case of the Addiction Field in France

公民社會的元組織和合法化過程：法國成癮領域的案例研究 Adrien Laurent, Pierre Garaudel, Géraldine Schmidt & Philippe Eynaud

3. Legitimacy as Property and Process: The Case of an Irish LGBT Organization

作為財產和過程的合法性：以愛爾蘭 LGBT組織為例 Sheila M Cannon

4. Unveiling Research Trends for Organizational Reputation in the Nonprofit Sector

揭開非營利部門組織聲譽的研究趨勢的帷幕 Márcia R. C. Santos, Raul M. S. Laureano & Sérgio Moro

3

5. How Nonprofits Can Recover from Crisis Events? The Trust Recovery from the Perspective of Causal Attributions 非營利組織如何從危機事件中恢復？因果歸因視角下的信任恢復 Jundong Hou, Chi Zhang, Haixiang Guo

6. Recovering from Scandals: Twitter Coverage of Oxfam and Save the Children Scandals 從醜聞中恢復：Twitter對於樂施會和拯救兒童醜聞的報道 Rebecca Scurlock, Nives Dolsak & Aseem Prakash

7. Online or Offline? Nonprofits’ Choice and Use of Social Media in Hong Kong 線上還是線下？香港非營利組織對社交媒體的選擇和使用 Wai Fung Lam, Lin Nie

8. How to Nail the Multiple Identities of an Organization? A Content Analysis of Projected Identity 如何應對組織的多重身份？預期身份的內容分析 Robert Heckert, Jelle Boumans & Rens Vliegenthart

9. Technological and Organizational Innovations and Financial Performance: Evidence from Nonprofit Human Service Organizations 技術和組織創新與財務績效：來自非營利性個人服務組織的證據 Kristina Jaskyte

10. Quality Differences of Public, For-Profit and Nonprofit Providers in Scandinavian Welfare? User Satisfaction in Kindergartens 斯堪的納維亞福利中公共、營利和非營利組織提供服務的質量差異？幼兒園用戶的滿意度 Håkon Solbu Trætteberg, Audun Fladmoe

11. The Strategic Action Field of Sex Work and Sex Trafficking: A Case Study of a Contentious Field in Chicago 性工作和性販賣的策略行動領域：以芝加哥一個有爭議的領域為例 Theresa Anasti

12. Field Emergence in Civil Society: A Theoretical Framework and Its Application to Community-Led Housing Organisations in England 公民社會領域的興起：一個理論框架及其在英格蘭社區主導的住房組織中的應用 Richard Lang, David Mullins

13. The Embeddedness of Nonprofit Leadership in Civic Governance 非營利領導力在公民治理中的嵌入性 Melissa A. Mathews

14. The Density of Nonprofit Organizations: Beyond Community Diversity and Resource Availability 非營利組織的密度：超越社區多樣性和資源可獲得性 Joowon Jeong, Tracy Shicun Cui

15. Methods for Classifying Nonprofit Organizations According to their Field of Activity: A Report on Semi-automated Methods Based on Text 根據非營利組織的活動領域對其分類的方法：基於文本的關於半自動方法的報告 Julia Litofcenko, Dominik Karner & Florentine Maier

16. Changing Policy Environments in Europe and the Resilience of the Third Sector 歐洲不斷變化的政策環境和第三部門的應變能力

4

Ulla Pape, Taco Brandsen, Joachim Benedikt Pahl, Bartosz Pieliński, Danijel Baturina, Nadia Brookes, Rafael Chaves-Ávila, Jeremy Kendall, Jelena Matančević, Francesca Petrella, Christina Rentzsch, Nadine Richez-Battesti, Teresa Savall-Morera, Ruth Simsa & Annette Zimmer

17. Cristina Balboa: The Paradox of Scale: How NGOs Build, Maintain, and Lose Authority in Environmental Governance 書評：規模的悖論：非政府組織如何在環境治理中建立、維護和失去權威 Sonja K. Pieck

18. China Brotsky, Sarah M. Eisinger, and Diane Vinokur-Kaplan: Shared Space and the New Nonprofit Workplace 書評：共享空間和新的非營利工作場所 Silvia Rodrigues Follador

19. The French Nonprofit Sector: A Literature Review

法國的非營利部門：一個文獻綜述 Pradeep Kumar

The China Nonprofit Review Volume 11, Issue 2, December 2019

I Selected Abstracts | 精選摘要

Promoting Research on Global Chinese Philanthropy: an Introduction to the Special Issue | 促進全球華

人慈善研究：特刊簡介

Min Zhou

Abstract:

Chinese culture has embedded a long tradition of charity and multiple strands of charitable thought. The ideas of “humaneness and the concern for the well-being of the common people,” rooted in Confucianism, have served as keystones to promote the spirit of philanthropy and the act of doing good. As culture is dynamic, Chinese philanthropy has been constantly shaped by time and space. Recent studies find patterns of differences and similarities.

The working paper series covers a review of the existing literature that examines patterns, causes, and consequences of philanthropy in mainland Chinese, Hong Kong Taiwan, Singapore, the United States; a historical overview of early and contemporary histories of Chinese philanthropy; selected case studies of philanthropy in higher education; a macro level analysis of philanthropy in the environmental arena; and an assessment of data availability. These working papers have raised several important analytical issues. First, in the field of philanthropy, practitioners are mostly concerned about action while scholars are concerned about explanation. Second, culture, religion, family, state, economy and other social forces, such as civil-society organizations, are key determining actors in shaping philanthropy. But as philanthropy is a dynamic phenomenon, these causal factors do not function in isolation. Third, the study of global Chinese philanthropy benefits from historical and comparative approaches. China may be unique. However, what makes China unique is not merely culture, but complex interactional processes across time and national borders. Fourth, insufficient research on global Chinese philanthropy is largely due to a severe shortage of data, especially comparative data.

5

摘要：中國文化蘊含著悠久的慈善傳統和多源的慈善思想。根植於儒家思想的“人道和關懷平民百姓的福祉”觀點

成為弘揚慈善精神和行為的基石。文化是不斷變化的，華人慈善發展也不斷受到時空的影響。最近的研究發現了

華人慈善事業發展模式的差異和相似性。

該系列論文包括了對現有文獻的回顧，考察了中國大陸、香港、臺灣、新加坡和美國的慈善事業的模式、成因和

結果；還包括了對中國早期和當代慈善事業的歷史回顧；高等教育慈善案例的研究；對於在環境領域慈善事業的

一個宏觀分析；以及對數據可用性的評估。這些文章提出了幾個重要的分析問題。第一，在慈善領域，從業者最

關註行動而學者更關註解釋。第二，文化、宗教、家庭、國家和其他社會力量（例如公民社會組織）是塑造慈善

事業的關鍵決定因素。但是由於慈善是一個不斷變化的現象，這些影響因素並非單獨地起作用。第三，對全球華

人慈善事業的研究得益於歷史和比較的研究方法。中國也許是第一無二的，但使中國與眾不同的不僅僅是文化，

而是跨時刻和國界的負責互動過程。第四，全球華人慈善事業研究的主要局限是數據，尤其是比較數據的不足。

Environmental Philanthropy and Civic Engagement: a Comparison of Mainland China, Taiwan, Hong

Kong, and Singapore | 環境慈善和公民參與：比較中國大陸、臺灣、香港和新加坡

Wenjuan Zheng (鄭文娟), Zhenxiang Chen (陳臻祥) and Paul Ong (鄧道明)

Abstract: Using the data from the World Value Survey, this paper uses a comparative lens to assess environmental philanthropy by focusing on four predominantly Chinese societies – mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore, which contributes to the debate on whether culture can sufficiently explain cross-regional variation in civic engagement, particularly in the domain of environmental philanthropy. We find that residents in mainland China shared similar environmental concerns and beliefs with people from the other regions, but they are least likely to volunteer, donate, and demonstrate for these causes. After accounting for personal characteristics, the sizeable interregional gaps on pro-environmental behaviors remain. These findings are consistent with the argument that structural differences, particularly the developing nature of civil society in mainland China, hinders environmental civic engagement.

摘要：本文使用世界價值調查的數據，以一個比較的視角來評估四個主要華人社會 – 中國大陸、臺灣、香港和

新加坡 – 的環境慈善事業。這有助於我們就文化能否充分解釋公民參與，尤其是在環境慈善領域，地區差異的

問題展開解釋。我們發現，中國大陸的居民與其他地區的居民也有相似的對於環境方面的關註和信念，但是他們

出於某些原因更少可能地參與誌願服務、捐款或者參與示威。在考慮了個人特質後，跨區域環保行為方面仍然存

在巨大的差異。這些發現與結構主義的觀點一致，中國大陸公民社會處於發展中的本質阻礙了在環境領域的公民

參與。

II Contents | 當期目錄

1. Promoting Research on Global Chinese Philanthropy: an Introduction to the Special Issue 促進全球華人慈善研究：特刊簡介 Min Zhou

2. The Donation of the Extremely Wealthy in China

中國極富群體的捐贈

6

Congcong Zhang (張叢叢) and Chien-Chung Huang (黃建忠)

3. China’s Shan’erdai: the Formation and Transformation of Philanthropy

中國的“善二代”：慈善事業的形成和轉型 Jinghua Xing (邢菁華) and Wei N. Gan (甘韡)

4. Philanthropic Action of Chinese Diaspora in Southeast Asia: Shaped by Family, Ancestry, Identity and

Social Norms 東南亞華僑的慈善行為：受家庭、先祖、身份和社會規範的塑造 Marina Tan Harper (陳美月)

5. Push and Pull: a Case Study of the Dynamics of Chinese Diaspora Philanthropy

推和拉：華僑慈善動態的案例研究 Jiangang Zhu (朱健剛) and Yanchun Jing (景燕春)

6. Rockefeller Foundation’s Rural Philanthropy in China: a Case Study of the North China Council for Rural Reconstruction 洛克菲勒基金會在中國農村的慈善事業：以華北農村重建項目為例 Ruisheng Zhang (张瑞胜)

7. Environmental Philanthropy and Civic Engagement: a Comparison of Mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore 環境慈善和公民參與：比較中國大陸、臺灣、香港和新加坡 Wenjuan Zheng (鄭文娟), Zhenxiang Chen (陳臻祥) and Paul Ong (鄧道明)

PUBLICATIONS/NEWS/REPORTS IN THE SECTOR | 部門出版/新聞/報告推介

Doctoral Seminar in Social Entrepreneurship and Philanthropy | ESSEC 高等商學院博士研討會：社會創業

和慈善

The ESSEC Business School Paris, HEC Li è ge Management School and emlyon business school are jointly organizing the third edition of the Doctoral Seminar in Social Entrepreneurship and Philanthropy (SEPHI) in Liège, Belgium, on the 8 and 9 September 2020. The seminar will gather about 20 doctoral students from different countries working at the intersection between social entrepreneurship and philanthropy.

This seminar could be of interest for PhD students in the ISTR community. Interested candidates should send a sample research paper or outline of their research in attachment to an email motivating their participation. The application should be sent by Thursday 30 April 2020 to Nathalie Jourdan: [email protected]

Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies: An International Multidisciplinary Series | 非營利和公民社會研究：國

際多學科系列叢書

Edited by Paul Dekker & Lehn Benjamin

Research on the nonprofit sector and civil society has gained momentum in recent years. Whereas interest in the institutional arena located between the state and the market remained a small specialty field until the late 1980s, since that time it has become a growth area. Research and funding opportunities have multiplied, as has the number of scholars and practitioners taking part in the development of a broad and ambitious agenda across the major social science disciplines.

Selected titles in this series:

mailto:[email protected]

7

• Handbook on Corporate Foundations • Corporate and Civil Society Perspectives • Civic Engagement in Scandinavia • Scandinavian Civil Society and Social Transformations • Corporate Social Responsibility and the Three Sectors in Asia • Perspectives on Volunteering • German Philanthropy in Transatlantic Perspective • Social Innovations in the Urban Context • Human Security and Philanthropy • Religion and Volunteering • The Handbook of Civil Society in Africa

This series publishes books of interest to a wide-ranging audience of researchers, advanced students, policymakers, and practitioners in this international area of study and practice. For more details about the series, please visit here.

Philanthropic Foundations and Social Welfare: A Comparative Study of Germany, Sweden and the

United Kingdom (England) | 慈善基金會和社會服福利：德國、瑞典和英國的比較研究

By Sarah Förster

The existing welfare regime literature identifies differences in welfare state systems. Sarah Förster asks, if we can learn something on the organizational level about the embedding of philanthropic foundations in the field of social welfare in different welfare state systems. This investigation is based on comparative insights from the three country cases of Germany, Sweden and the UK (England). Guided by propositions from theoretical analysis of welfare regime literature, comparative explorative case studies based on interview data and secondary sources give insights into the field and the embedding of philanthropic social welfare foundations in the three different welfare state systems. Each type of foundation has different levels of independence from external constraints and is embedded to different degrees according to the propositions from welfare regime theory. These differences hold further implications for the investigation of foundations as a special organizational form. For more details, please visit here.

Building State Capability: Evidence, Analysis, Action | 建設國家能力：證據，分析和行動

Matt Andrews, Lant Pritchett, Michael Woolcock

Governments play a major role in the development process, and constantly introduce reforms and policies to achieve developmental objectives. Many of these interventions have limited impact, however; schools get built but children don't learn, IT systems are introduced but not used, plans are written but not implemented. These achievement deficiencies reveal gaps in capabilities, and weaknesses in the process of building state capability.

This book addresses these weaknesses and gaps. It starts by providing evidence of the capability shortfalls that currently exist in many countries, showing that many governments lack basic capacities even after decades of reforms and capacity building efforts. The book then analyses this evidence, identifying capability traps that hold many governments back - particularly related to isomorphic mimicry (where governments copy best practice solutions from other countries that make them look more capable even if they are not more capable) and premature load bearing (where governments adopt new mechanisms that they cannot actually make work, given weak extant capacities). The book then describes a process that governments can use to escape these capability traps. Called PDIA (problem driven iterative adaptation), this process empowers people working in governments to find and fit solutions to the problems they face. The discussion about this process is structured in a practical manner so that readers can actually apply tools and ideas to the capability challenges they face in their own contexts. These applications will help readers devise policies and reforms that have more impact than those of the past. For more details, please visit here.

https://www.springer.com/series/6339https://www.springer.com/us/book/9783658284985https://global.oup.com/academic/product/building-state-capability-9780198853039?lang=en&cc=au

8

CALL FOR PAPERS | 論文徵集

Call for Papers: Special Issue to VOLUNTAS

Paradox within the Management of Volunteers

Deadline for abstract submission: August 15, 2020 | 摘要提交期限：2020 年 8 月 15 日

The guest editors of the special issue welcome contributions dealing with different kinds of paradoxes that are challenging and/or stimulating management of volunteers. Papers submitted can be solely conceptual in nature and/or based on empirical insights, but must, in any case, make a significant contribution to the understanding of how paradoxes are at stake within the management of volunteers. Possible topics include, but are not limited to:

• What characterizes voluntariness as a certain paradoxical form of practice, and how do actors attempt to manage it?

• How can an organization manage the relation between the need for formal integration and at the same time respect the autonomy of the volunteers?

• What kinds of dilemmas appear within different “empowerment projects? • How might volunteers’ ideas of what care should be come into tension with the reality of the people who

become objects for these caring ambitions? • How and why avoiding intimacy becomes an important ambition within certain forms of voluntary care,

and how is this achieved? For more information about the conference, please visit here.

Call for Papers: Australian Political Studies Association Conference 2020

Politics in the Age of Disruption and Realignment

Deadline for abstract submission: May 3, 2020 | 摘要提交期限：2020 年 5 月 3 日

Conference Dates: September 21-23, 2020 | 會議日期：2020 年 9 月 21-23 日

Location: Sydney, Australia

The theme of APSA 2020 is ‘Politics in the Age of Disruption and Realignment’. The theme recognises the rapidly changing nature of contemporary politics, and invites an explicit focus on the causes, manifestations and consequences of the new political, technological and ideological constellations of our time. The conference will feature two distinguished keynote speakers: Professor Adrian Pabst (University of Kent) and Professor Emeritus Linda Weiss (University of Sydney).

Submissions relating to political studies generally, and especially addressing the theme, are encouraged and can be made via the Abstract Submission Portal. We welcome innovative proposals for panels, roundtables and of course, submission from individual presenters.

All enquiries regarding abstracts for APSA 2020 should be emailed to [email protected]

https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.istr.org/resource/resmgr/calls/Paradoxes.pdfmailto:[email protected]

9

Call for Papers: The 26th IPSA World Congress 2020

New Nationalisms in an Open World

Deadline for proposals: 20 May 2020 | 研究計劃提交截止：2020 年 5 月 20 日

Conference Dates：July 25-29, 2020 | 會議日期：2020 年 7 月 25-29 日

Location: Lisbon, Portugal

With the beginning of the present millennium, varieties of a new type of nationalism spread through the world and this propagation engenders a paradox as its spectacular rising occurs in a period which is characterized by openness, globalization and interdependence. Historically, nationalism as an ideology has risen as a response to rapid change; the contemporary context of openness, globalization and interdependence therefore shapes the type of nationalisms in the present millennium. Besides, new nationalism rises in both the affluent and destitute societies which in turn shapes the way the new nationalism manifests itself. Hence, what we observe today can be rather referred to as new nationalisms. The rise of the varieties of new nationalism and its implications on international politics requires posing some key questions in order to attain a more sophisticated level of understanding. What is new nationalism, who are the new nationalist leaders and what are the similarities and differences between the new nationalisms and its predecessors? How can we interpret and classify new nationalisms taking populism, authoritarianism and ethnicism into consideration together with new nationalism? Finally, what are the potential ramifications of new nationalism on political mobilization, electoral behavior, political systems as well as on global governance and international relations?

For more information, please visit the event website.

JOB VACANCY | 最新職位空缺

Australia | 澳大利亞

Lecturer & Professor - Police Studies and Emergency Management, University of Tasmania

Application Closing Date: 3 Mar 2020

Position Enquiries: Nicholas Farrelly at [email protected]

Lecturer & Senior Lecturer - Organisational Psychology, Macquarie University


Position Enquiries: Professor Erik Reichle at [email protected]

Research Fellow in Community Engagement, Monash University


Position Enquiries: Associate Professor Adrian Carter at +61 3 9902 9431

https://www.ipsa.org/events/congress/lisbon2020mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://jobs.unimelb.edu.au/caw/en/job/901651/lecturer-in-public-policy

10

Belgium | 比利時

Postdoc in Social Media Intervention to Reduce Smoking, Catholic University of Leuven


Position Enquiries: Prof. Kathleen Beullensat at [email protected]

Canada | 加拿大

Assistant / Associate / Full Professor of Socio-Legal Studies, York University

Application Closing Date: 29 Feb 2020

Position Enquiries: Professor Uwa Idemudia at [email protected]

Hong Kong | 香港

Post-doctoral Fellow in Social Work and Social Administration, University of Hong Kong

Application Closing Date: 29 Feb 2020

Apply Online

Netherlands | 荷蘭

Assistant Professor of Sociology, VU University of Amsterdam


Position Enquiries: Prof. M.I. Broese van Groenou at [email protected]

Postdoctoral Position in Transformations of Work and Livelihood in Post-Welfare Societies, University

of Amsterdam


Position Enquiries: Niels van Doorn at [email protected]

Norway | 挪威

Postdoctoral Fellow in Human Geography, University of Oslo


Position Enquiries Associate Professor Jemima García-Godos at [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://jobs.hku.hk/en/job/499487/postdoctoral-fellowmailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]

11

Sweden | 瑞典

Researcher in Social Sciences, Stockholm University


Position Enquiries: Professor Carina Mood at [email protected]

Postdoc Position in Sociology, Stockholm University


Position Enquiries: Associate Professor Anna Lund at [email protected]

United Kingdom | 英國

Lecturer in The History of Political Thought, University of Cambridge


Position Enquiries: Professor Alexandra Walsham at [email protected]

Lecturer in Development Economics, University of Oxford


Position Enquiries: Jain Sanjay at [email protected]

Lecturer in Global Governance, University of Oxford


Apply Online

Associate Professorship in Political Economy, University of Oxford


Apply Online

United States | 美國

Lecturer in Social Studies, Harvard University

Application Closing Date: 2 March 2020

Position Enquiries: Shane Iverson at [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://my.corehr.com/pls/uoxrecruit/erq_jobspec_version_4.display_form?p_company=10&p_internal_external=E&p_display_in_irish=N&p_process_type=&p_applicant_no=&p_form_profile_detail=&p_display_apply_ind=Y&p_refresh_search=Y&p_recruitment_id=145188https://my.corehr.com/pls/uoxrecruit/erq_jobspec_version_4.display_form?p_company=10&p_internal_external=E&p_display_in_irish=N&p_process_type=&p_applicant_no=&p_form_profile_detail=&p_display_apply_ind=Y&p_refresh_search=Y&p_recruitment_id=145235mailto:[email protected]

12

Lecturer in Sociology, Harvard University


Position Enquiries: Suzanne Ogungbadero at [email protected]

Lecturer Positions in Public Affairs, UCLA


Apply Online

Associate Professor in Social Welfare, UCLA


Apply Online

CONTACT US | 聯絡我們

Regional Representatives | 地區代表

清華大學賈西津教授: [email protected]

清華大學何建宇教授: [email protected]

台灣政治大學江明修教授: [email protected]

香港城市大學蔡琦海博士: [email protected]

新南威爾士大學吴逢时教授: [email protected]

宫城大学石田祐博士: [email protected]

新加坡國立大學韓鈴博士: [email protected]

Staff | 工作負責人

Editor: Fengshi Wu

Editorial Assistant: Qianjin Zhang

Email: [email protected]

ABOUT US | 關於我們

The Asia Pacific Third-Sector Researchers Network (formerly the East Asia Third-Sector Researchers Network) is an

initiative first launched by the ISTR (International Society for Third-Sector Research) and the Centre for Social Innovation

Studies in the Chinese University of Hong Kong in 2016 to help scholars and students in East Asia and beyond to exchange

mailto:[email protected]://recruit.apo.ucla.edu/JPF05007https://recruit.apo.ucla.edu/JPF04810mailto:[email protected]

13

information about publications, conferences and job vacancies in third-sector studies through this Newsletter. The scope

of the Newsletter and the network has expanded to cover the entire Asia Pacific region since November 2018. Starting

from January 2020, the School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, becomes the host of the

Newsletter, and the scope of the Newsletter and the network has expanded to cover the entire Asia Pacific. You are

welcome to follow us on Facebook (ISTR-Asia Pacific) and Weibo (@亚太第三部门研究网络).

亞太第三部門研究人員網絡（前身为東亞第三部門研究人員網絡）是由 ISTR（國際第三部門研究學會）和香港中文大學社

會創新研究中心於 2016 年發起成立。該網絡旨在通過發布每月通訊為亞太及其他地區的學者和學生提供第三部門研究領域

出版物，學術會議，職位空缺等相關信息交流。從 2018 年 11 月起，該通訊和研究網絡的範圍也擴大到整個亞太地區。新

南威尔士大學社会科学学院从 2020 年 1 月起成為該通訊的承辦單位，歡迎您在 Facebook (ISTR-Asia Pacific) 和微博（@

亞太第三部门研究网络）上關註我們。

https://www.facebook.com/ISTR-East-Asia-473492836364861/?fref=tshttps://www.weibo.com/istreastasiahttps://www.facebook.com/ISTR-East-Asia-473492836364861/?fref=tshttps://www.weibo.com/istreastasiahttps://www.weibo.com/istreastasia

EDITOR’S NOTE | 編輯按CORE ACADEMIC JOURNALS | 核心學術期刊PUBLICATIONS/NEWS/REPORTS IN THE SECTOR | 部門出版/新聞/報告推介CALL FOR PAPERS | 論文徵集JOB VACANCY | 最新職位空缺CONTACT US | 聯絡我們About US | 關於我們

Documents

ASIA PACIFIC THIRD-SECTOR RESEARCHERS NETWORK … · Nonprofits are strategically using social media to disseminate information, engage with community, and mobilize activities. The