Upload
julio-benavides
View
185
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
1/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005
BACKHOE LOADERS
ProductComparison TRAINING
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
2/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005
KOMATSU vs VOLVO
Side-by-side feature comparison has been done with WB93R-5 and BL71
in KUE in April 2005
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
3/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 3 of 38
CONFIGURATION
P-Shuttle T/M PPC joystick for loader
Mechanical levers for backhoe
Net power: 99,2 HP
Std operating weight: 7.400 kg
CONFIGURATION
P-Shuttle T/M PPC joystick for loader
Mechanical levers for backhoe
Net power: 90 HP
Std operating weight: 7.680 kg
KOMATSU WB93R-5 VOLVO BL71
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
4/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 4 of 38
Competitive scenario
KOMATSU vs VOLVO
WB97S-2
WB97R-5
WB93R-5
WB91R-2
BL71BL61
7.000
7.500
8.000
8.500
70,0 80,0 90,0 100,0 110,0Net Power [HP]
OperatingWeight[kg]
KOMATSU VOLVO
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
5/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 5 of 38
Operator environment Cab
Modern design and new styling
Round glass surfaces
Excellent visibility all around Wide doors for a better access
Lower position of the cab: only 3
steps to enter
Larger cab
All flat glasses
Doors have openable windows
that reduce side visibility Smaller entrance doors
Cab position is higher with 4 steps
to enter: not an easy access
1.5
20mm
1.4
50mm
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
6/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 6 of 38
Operator environment Cab
Strong and protecting roof
All the windows have a strong
metallic frame for a better glass
protection
Front and rear side windows aremounted without frame: higher
possibility of damage
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
7/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 7 of 38
Operator environment Front visibility
Excellent visibility to the front
working area thanks to the sloping
engine bonnet and exhaust gaspipe at cab side
Exhaust gas pipe and high engine
bonnet reduce visibility to the
front working area
Loader is not very visible
Less central visibility due to
mono-link cylinder
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
8/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 8 of 38
Operator environment Upper front visibility
Upper window gives a perfect
visibility in high position for
loading operations
Loader is completely visible
No upper window available
Loader is not completely visible
1.220 mm1.110 mm
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
9/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 9 of 38
Operator environment Cab interior
Lockable storage compartment
Better finishing inside cab
8 all-around air vents standard
Poor finishing of panels and
plastics
Only 4 air vents standard
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
10/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 10 of 38
Operator environment - Seat Sensor
Not available The Safe Position seat sensor
warns with an acoustic alarm the
operator when the seat is out of
the Loader position and the
Fwd/Rev shifter is activated
This application complies with the
European Standard (EN 474-3)
Safe position
sensor
N/A
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
11/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 11 of 38
Loader - Structure
Parallel linkage Divergent structure: better
stability and less torsion
Mono cylinder linkage Possible problems of torsion
Not popular in Europe
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
12/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 12 of 38
Loader - Self levelling
Self-levelling when lifting and
lowering (max angle 11), ideal
with forks
NO self levelling system
but advertised in the brochure
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
13/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 13 of 38
Loader - Performances
Lifting capacity at max height:
3.900 kg
Bucket breakout force: 6.500 kg
(std bucket)
Lifting capacity at max height:
3.150 kg
Bucket breakout force: 5.450 kg
(std bucket)
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
14/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 14 of 38
Loader - Controls
PPC joystick standard (for the
whole range) Multifunction joystick
On top: open/close 4x1 bucket,
de-clutch, differential lock
Underneath: Speed-up, kick
down (only with P-shift)
PPC joystick standard
Multifunction joystick
On top: Fwd/Neutral/Rev
selector, open/close 4x1 bucket
Underneath: de-clutch
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
15/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 15 of 38
Backhoe - Structure
Slightly curved boom
Telescopic arm looks weak
New S-Shaped boom
Excavator style Easier truck loading capacity
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
16/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 16 of 38
Backhoe - Performances
Arm breakout force: 3.980 kg
Bucket breakout force: 6.010 kg
Lift capacity at full reach (SAE J31)
standard: 1.147 kg
with extended telesc.: 938 kg
Arm breakout force: 4.000 kg
Bucket breakout force: 6.100 kg
Lift capacity at full reach (SAE J31)
standard: 1.550 kg
with extended telesc.: 1.200 kg
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
17/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 17 of 38
Backhoe - Digging Depth
Digging depth [SAE]
standard: 4.244 mm
with extended telesc.: 5.314 mm
Same for BL71 and B L61
WB93R-5 Digging depth [SAE]
standard: 4.540 mm
with extended telesc.: 5.650 mm
WB97R-5 Digging depth [SAE]
standard: 4.840 mm
with extended telesc.: 6.080 mm
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
18/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 18 of 38
Backhoe - Controls
Mechanical levers are standard for
WB93R-5
PPC joysticks as option
Standard PPC controls for
stabilisers
Mechanical levers
PPC not available
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
19/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 19 of 38
Backhoe - Bucket
Only 1 digging position: no
customisation
2 digging positions:
1) close to bucket teeth: plinth
digging (vertical digging)2) far from bucket teeth: higher
force and bucket rotating angle
1 21
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
20/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 20 of 38
Backhoe - Stabilisers
The upper part of the stabiliser is
protected by a rubber cap
Stabilisers are adjustable from 2sides
The upper part of the stabiliser is
not covered: mud and dirt can
enter
Stabilisers are adjustable only
from 1 side
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
21/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 21 of 38
Performances - Productivity TEST
Test conditions, according to KES (Komatsu Engineering Standard):
LOADER: V-shape loading on a truck (2.850 mm height)
BACKHOE: trench digging and dumping at 45 - 1.700 rpm
180,6
101,3
155,2
97,3
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Productivity LOADER Productivity B/H
m3/hrs
WB93R-5
BL71
P f C l i TEST
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
22/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 22 of 38
Performances - Cycle time TEST
Test conditions, according to KES:
LOADER: V-shape loading on a truck (2.850 mm height)
BACKHOE: trench digging and dumping at 45 - 1.700 rpm
20,6
9,8
23,9
11,8
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Loader Backhoe
seconds
WB93R-5
BL71
P f Si l t ti
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
23/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 23 of 38
Performances - Single movement times
Single times - Backhoe - 1.700 rpm
2,7
2,0
3,7
3,0
2,3
3,2 3,2
2,52,3
3,5
3,9
2,9
2,3
3,43,2
4,2
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,02,5
3,0
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0
boom
raising
boom
lowerinig
arm digging arm
dumping
bucket
closing
bucket
opening
swing C.W. swing
C.C.W.
seconds WB93R-5
BL71
Single times - Loader - Max rpm4,4
3,0
1,61,9
4,2
2,21,9
1,5
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
3,0
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0
loader raising loader lowering bucket roll-back bucketdumping
seconds
WB93R-5
BL71
E i S ifi ti
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
24/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 24 of 38
Engine - Specifications
Displacement: 4,5 L
Aspiration: Turbo
Power: 99,2 HP (SAE)
Max torque: 398 Nm at 1400 rpm
Muffler with insulation material
Stage 2
Displacement: 4 L
Aspiration: Turbo
Power: 90 HP (SAE)
Max torque: 383 Nm at 1500 rpm
Muffler without insulation material
Stage 2
E i F l ti TEST
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
25/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 25 of 38
Engine - Fuel consumption TEST
Test conditions, according to KES:
LOADER: V-shape loading on a truck (2.850 mm height)
BACKHOE: trench digging and dumping at 45 - 1.700 rpm
10,4
13,4
10,2
13,1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
B/H Loader
L/hr WB93R-5
BL71
T i i
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
26/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 26 of 38
Transmission
Max speed: 38,5 km/h
Power Shuttle transmission
4-speed Gear lever is far from the operator
Max speed: 40km/h
Power Shuttle transmission
4-speed Gear lever is in a comfortable
position, near the seat
F t A l
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
27/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 27 of 38
Front Axle
Oscillation: 20 (total)
Double acting steering cylinder
Remote grease fitting
Oscillation: 16 (total); the
smallest value in the market, with
JCB
Double acting steering cylinders
R A l
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
28/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 28 of 38
Rear Axle
100% electro-hydraulic differential
lock, controlled by a switch on the
PPC joystick
100% electro-hydraulic differential
lock, controlled by a small pedal
very close to brakes. It can beengaged accidentally
H d li S t
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
29/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 29 of 38
Hydraulics - System
Komatsu CLSS (Closed Load
Sensing System) : more power to
the working equipment at any
engine rpm
LIFD (Load Independent FlowDivider): the system forces the oil
to all circuits regardless the
different load
One valve for loader and backhoe
Closed center, Load sensing
LIFD inside
One valve for loader and backhoe
Simi lar to Kom atsu system
CLSS CLSS
H d li P
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
30/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 30 of 38
Hydraulics - Pump
Variable displacement piston
pump Flow: 165 l/min
Pressure: 250 bar
Hydraulic power: 92 Hp
Variable displacement piston
pump Flow: 160 l/min
Pressure: 250 bar
Hydraulic power: 89 Hp
H dra lics Working modes
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
31/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 31 of 38
Hydraulics - Working modes
Backhoe
Power: max hydraulic power
available
Economy: finishing works and
fuel saving
Loader
Speed Up: increases speed of
15%
No working modes available
Power/Economy
switch
Speed-Up switch
N/A
Serviceability Accessibility
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
32/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 32 of 38
Serviceability - Accessibility
One piece fully tiltable bonnet
There is a large knob to open the
bonnet
All checks and filters are well
grouped and easy to reach
Maintenance is possible also with
the loader arm lowered
One piece tiltable bonnet with
internal insulation
There is no handle to raise the
bonnet Filters are on the right and checks
on the left
Engine is difficult to reach when
loader arm is lowered
Serviceability Toolbox & Battery
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
33/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 33 of 38
Serviceability - Toolbox & Battery
Lockable compartment, on the
side
Wide toolbox, separate from thebattery area
Lockable in open position
Interval for hydraulic oil
replacement : 2000 hours
Toolbox: smaller
Battery is located on a sliding
drawer under the toolbox
Interval for hydraulic oil
replacement: 1000 hours
Serviceability Fuel tank
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
34/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 34 of 38
Serviceability Fuel tank
Capacity: 150 liters
Low position: easy to refill, alsowith poly-tanks
Strainer is standard
The top of the tank its a very wide
step for cab entrance
Capacity: 120 liters
Higher position vs Komatsu
Not wide feet space over the tank
Serviceability Radiator
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
35/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 35 of 38
Serviceability - Radiator
2 different radiators, one in front
to the other
Hydraulic oil radiator is tiltable:
system used by Komatsu in thepast
More complicate to clean
1 radiator, with 3 separate
sections side-by-side, aluminum
type (T/M oil, engine water,
hydraulic oil)
Easy to clean
Better structure and quality
Radiator is mounted on 4 elastic
supports
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
36/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 36 of 38
Best Selling Features vs VOLVO 1/2 LOADER, superior performances:
Stronger loader structure, with less torsion
+24% lifting capacity
+19% bucket breakout force
+16% productivity
+16% faster cycle time
self levelling
BACKHOE, superior performances:
+35% lifting capacity
+14% digging depth for WB97R-5; +8% for WB93R-5
+4% productivity
+20% faster cycle time
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
37/38
KUE Marketing - May 2005 Komatsu vs VOLVO page 37 of 38
Best Selling Features vs VOLVO 2/2 Engine: +10% power and higher torque
Better visibility (front and upper)
Better styling, ergonomics and comfort of the cab
Larger cab
PPC servo-controls for backhoe are not available for Volvo
Working modes for loader and backhoe (Speed-Up and Power &Economy). Not available for Volvo
Fuel tank: +25% capacity and easy-to-refill
Longer (double) hydraulic oil change interval
7/15/2019 Bhl Komatsu vs Volvo
38/38
Please consider this Training for use internal
only to KOMATSU Sales Network.