19
Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment Shinsuke Murakami (PhD) [email protected] Assoc. Prof., Sch. of Eng., The University of Tokyo Chair, the Organizing Committee of EcoBalance 2018 1

Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment · Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment ShinsukeMurakami (PhD) [email protected] Assoc. Prof., Sch. of Eng.,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment · Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment ShinsukeMurakami (PhD) smurakam@sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp Assoc. Prof., Sch. of Eng.,

Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment

Shinsuke Murakami (PhD)[email protected]. Prof., Sch. of Eng., The University of Tokyo

Chair, the Organizing Committee of EcoBalance 2018

1

Page 2: Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment · Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment ShinsukeMurakami (PhD) smurakam@sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp Assoc. Prof., Sch. of Eng.,

Japanese Resource Policy and Rare-Metals

Ø Japan has really limited domestic supply of metal ores.Ø only one small gold mine is now currently operating.

Ø Japanese economy’s high dependency on manufacturing industries, especially electronics, machineries, therefore securing stable supply of materials for the industries has been essential for Japan.

Ø Rare-metals?: 31 elements defined officially by Japanese government (See the periodic table in the next slide)Ø Selection criteria: {“Geologically rare” or ”technically

economically difficult to recover”} & “strong demand in industry for now and future”

Japanese Policy

2

Page 3: Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment · Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment ShinsukeMurakami (PhD) smurakam@sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp Assoc. Prof., Sch. of Eng.,

1 18f 1.01 s 4.00

2.20 hex hex0.32 14 treat 952.08 20 struc 2 13 14 15 16 17 0.51 4.22

f 6.94 s 9.01 p 10.80 p 12.00 p 14.00 p 16.00 p 19.00 p 20.20

0.98 cbc 1.57 hex 2.04 rho 2.55 hex 3.04 hex 3.44 cub 3.98 cub cfc1.23 454 treat 0.90 1560 0.82 2349 0.77 4300 var 0.75 63 var 0.73 54 var 0.72 53 treat 0.71 241.55 1615 elec 1.12 2742 0.98 4200 enz 0.91 4000 struc 0.92 77 struc 0.92 90 struc 0.57 85 0.51 27

s 23.00 s 24.3 p 27.00 p 28.10 p 31.00 p 32.10 35.50 40.00

0.93 cbc 1.31 hex 1.61 cfc 1.90 cfc 2.20 2.58 ort 3.16 ort cfc1.54 370.8 treat 1.36 923 treat 1.18 933 1.11 1687 treat 1.06 317 diag 1.02 388 treat 0.99 171 0.98 871.90 1156 elec 1.60 1363 enz 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1.43 2792 1.32 3538 struc 1.28 550 struc 1.27 717 struc 0.97 239 elec 0.88 87

s 23.00 s 40.10 d 45.00 d 47.90 d 50.90 d 52.00 d 54.90 d 55.90 d 58.90 d 58.70 d 63.60 65.40 p 69.70 p 72.60 p 74.90 79.00 79.90 83.80

0.82 cbc 1.00 cfc 1.36 hex 1.54 hex 1.63 cbc 1.66 cbc 1.55 cub 1.83 cbc 1.88 hex 1.91 cfc 1.90 cfc 1.65 hex 1.81 ort 2.01 cfc 2.18 rho 2.55 hex 2.96 ort 3.00 cfc2.03 336.5 treat 1.74 1115 treat 1.44 1814 1.32 1941 treat 1.22 2183 1.18 2180 diag 1.17 1519 diag 1.17 1811 treat 1.16 1768 diag 1.15 1728 1.17 1357 treat 1.25 692 treat 1.26 302 diag 1.22 1211 treat 1.20 1090 treat 1.16 494 treat 1.14 265 treat 1.89 115 diag2.35 1032 elec 1.97 1757 struc 1.62 3109 1.45 3560 1.34 3680 enz 1.30 2944 enz 1.35 2334 enz 1.26 3134 enz 1.25 3200 enz 1.24 3186 enz 1.28 2835 enz 1.38 1180 enz 1.41 2477 1.37 3106 1.39 887 1.40 958 enz 1.11 332 1.03 119

s 85.50 s 87.60 d 88.90 d 91.22 d 92.90 d 95.90 d 98.00 d 101.10 d 102.90 d 106.40 d 107.90 d 112.40 p 114.80 p 118.70 p 121.80 127.60 126.90 131.30

0.82 cbc 0.95 cfc 1.22 hex 1.33 hex 1.60 cbc 2.16 cbc 1.90 hex 2.20 hex 2.28 cfc 2.00 cfc 1.93 cfc 1.69 hex 1.78 tet 1.96 tet 2.05 rho 2.10 hex 2.66 ort 2.60 cfc2.16 312.5 treat 1.91 1050 var 1.62 1799 treat 1.45 2128 1.34 2750 1.40 2896 1.27 2430 diag 1.25 2607 treat 1.25 2237 2.00 1828 treat 1.34 1234 treat 1.41 594 treat 1.44 42 diag 1.41 505 1.40 903 treat 1.36 722 1.33 386 var 1.31 161 diag2.48 961 2.15 1655 enz 1.78 3609 1.60 4682 1.46 5017 1.39 4912 enz 1.36 4538 1.34 4423 1.34 3968 1.37 3236 1.44 2435 1.71 1040 1.66 2345 1.62 2875 1.59 1860 1.42 1261 1.32 457 enz 1.24 165

132.90 137.30 d 178.50 d 181.00 183.80 d 186.20 d 190.20 d 192.20 d #### d 197.00 d 200.60 p 204.40 p 207.20 p 209.00 p 209.00 210.00 222.00

Lanthanides

0.79 cbc 0.89 cbc 1.30 hex 1.50 cbc 2.36 cbc 1.90 hex 2.20 hex 2.20 cfc 2.28 cfc 2.54 cfc 2.00 rho 1.62 hex 2.33 cfc 2.02 rho 2.00 cub 2.20 cfc2.35 301.6 treat 1.98 1000 diag 1.44 2506 1.34 3290 treat 1.30 3695 1.28 2459 1.26 3306 diag 1.27 2719 treat 1.30 2041 treat 1.34 1137 treat 1.49 234 treat 1.48 577 treat 1.47 600 treat 1.46 544 treat 1.53 527 1.47 575 202 treat2.67 944 2.22 2170 1.67 4876 1.49 5731 1.41 5828 1.37 5869 1.35 5285 1.36 4701 1.39 4098 1.46 3129 1.60 629 1.71 1746 1.75 2022 1.70 1837 1.67 1235 1.45 610 1.34 211

[223] [226] d [261] d [262] d [263] d [264] d [277] d [278] d [282] [272] d [285] [284] [289] p [288] p [292] [294]

Actinides

0.70 cbc 0.90 cbc cbc cbc cbc hex300? -- 973 treat 0.74 0.66 0.63

2.70 950? 2.23 2010 1.50 1.39 1.32

f 138.90 f 140.10 f 140.90 f 144.20 f 145.00 f 150.40 f 152.00 f 157.40 f 158.90 f 162.50 f 164.90 f 167.20 f 168.90 f 173.00 d 175.00

1.10 hex 1.13 cfc 1.13 hex 1.14 hex 1.13 hex 1.17 rho 1.20 cbc 1.20 hex 1.10 hex 1.22 hex 1.23 hex 1.24 hex 1.25 hex 1.10 cfc 1.27 hex1.25 1193 1.65 1068 1.65 1208 1.64 1297 1.63 1315 1.62 1345 1.85 1099 1.61 1585 1.59 1629 1.59 1680 1.58 1734 1.57 1802 1.56 1818 1.70 1097 1.56 19251.38 3737 1.81 3716 1.82 3793 1.82 3347 1.85 3273 1.81 2067 1.99 1802 1.80 3546 1.80 3503 1.80 2840 1.79 2993 1.78 3141 1.77 2223 1.94 1469 1.75 3675

f [227] f 232.00 f [231] f 238.00 f [237] f [244] f [243] f [247] f [247] f [251] f [252] f [257] [258] [250] [260]

1.10 cfc 1.30 cfc #### ort 1.38 ort 1.36 o,t,c 1.28 mono 1.13 hex 1.28 hex 1.30 hex 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.301323 1.65 2115 1841 1.42 1405 910 1.08 912 1449 1613 1133 1800 1100 1100 1900

1.88 3471 1.80 5061 1.61 4300 1.38 4404 1.30 4273 1.51 3505 1.84 2880 3383

2

HeHelium

3 4

11

Na

21

Sc

LiLithium

BeBeryllium

22

Sodium

19

KPotassium

12

MgMagnesium

4

CaCalcium

Francium Radium

55 56

Cs BaCesium Barium

37 38

Rb SrRubidium Strontium

39 40 41 42

25 26

87 88

Fr Ra

23 24

V CrVanadium Chromium

TiScandium Titanium

Nb MoNiobium Molybdenum

72 73

Y ZrYttrium Zirconium

Rf DbRutherfordium Dubnium

74

WTungsten

106

SgSeaborgium

Hf TaHafnium Tantalum

104 105

27 28

Co NiCobalt Nickel

Re OsRhenium Osmium

Tc RuTechnitium Ruthenium

75 76

Mn FeManganese Iron

43 44 45 46

Rh PdRhodium Palladium

Bh HsBorhium Hassium

107 108

Mt DsMeitnerium Darmstadtium

77 78

Ir PtIridium Platinum

79 80

Au HgGold Mercury

47 48

Ag CdSilver Cadmium

Ga GeGallium Germanium

Aluminum Silicon

Boron Carbon

13 14

Al Si

5 6

C

29 30

Cu ZnCopper Zinc

7 8

Nitrogen OxygenN O

113 114

Uut Uuq

81 82

Tl PbThallium Lead

49 50

In SnIndium Tin

31 32

As SeArsenic Selenium

15 16

P SPhosphorus Sulphur

9 10

Fluorine NeonF Ne

115 116

Uup Uuh

83 84

Bi PoBismuth Polonium

51 52

Sb TeAntimony Tellurium

33 34 35 36

Br KrBromine Krypton

17 18

Cl ArChlorine Argon

85 86

At RnAstatine Radon

53 54

I XeIodine Xenon

57 58

La CeLanthanum Cerium

117 118

Uus UuoUnunseptium* Unoctium*Ununpentium* Ununhexium*Ununtrium* Ununquadium*

111 112

Rg UubRoentgenium Ununbium*

109 110

61 62

Pm SmPromethium Samarium

59 60

Pr NdPraseodymium Neodymium

Tb DyTerbium Dysprosium

63 64

Eu GdEuropium Gadolinium

71

LuLutetium

89 90 91 92 93 94 95

69 70

Tm YbThulium Ytterbium

67 68

Ho ErHolmium Erbium

65 66

103

Ac Th Pa U Np Pu Am Cm96 97 98 99 100 101

Californium Einsteinium Fermium Mendeleevium Nobelium LawrenciumLr

Actinium Thorium Protactinium Uranium Neptunium Plutonium Americium Curium BerkeliumBk Cf Es Fm Md No

102

6

7

Period

1

2

3

4

5

1

HHydogen

B

Rare-metals (Orange colored)30 + Rare Earth Elements

Japanese Policy

3

Page 4: Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment · Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment ShinsukeMurakami (PhD) smurakam@sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp Assoc. Prof., Sch. of Eng.,

Exploration – Development –Production (Mining)

Materials Production and Use

EOL management(recycling)

5 core policy measures in Japanese mineral resource policy

Japanese Policy

<Oversea Mines>• Financial aid for oversea

exploration• Loans for private mining

companies…• Diplomatic efforts<Seabed>• Reserve estimation, tech.

R&D

• Funding R&D for material substitution, reducing the rare-metal use, new scrap recycling and other smelting refining technologies

• Stockpiling

• Funding R&D projects for EOL recycling

• Social Systems for more comprehensive EOL management?

Securing Stable

Resource supply

Securing the stable supply from oversea

mines

Material substitution Stockpiling

Recycling

5 approaches for securing the stable supply

Seabed Mineral Res.

Dev.4

Page 5: Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment · Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment ShinsukeMurakami (PhD) smurakam@sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp Assoc. Prof., Sch. of Eng.,

Previous Assessments for Governmental Stockpile<Early Assessment>

• After experiencing two oil crisis, not only crude oil but also minerals stockpiling scheme was established in 1983.• Demands for 60 days stockpiled. (42 by government,

while 18 days by private.)

• 7 rare-metals were chosen to be stockpiled.• Co, W, V, Mo, Ni, Cr, Mn: 1st choice. (1984)

<Later…>

• In, Ga: already added to stockpile? (2009)• Pt, REE, Nb, Ta, Sr: should be carefully monitored

Japanese Policy

5

Page 6: Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment · Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment ShinsukeMurakami (PhD) smurakam@sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp Assoc. Prof., Sch. of Eng.,

Assessment for RecyclingAround 2011, when the recycling law for Small-size home appliance was prepared, the governmental council discussed which minor elements should be targeted in the EOL recycling.

• Nd, Dy, Co, W, Ta was chosen.• Firstly, 14 elements was chosen as candidates.• From the 14 elements, 3 metals, which are already well recycled

from new scraps (In, Ga, Ce,) and 6 metals, which seems technically impossible to recycle now (Li, La, Y, Eu, Tb, Sm) are excluded.

• The recycling of the chosen 5 elements had no economic feasibility at that time therefore council advised to support R&D projects and also implement needed social systems.

6

Japanese Policy

Page 7: Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment · Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment ShinsukeMurakami (PhD) smurakam@sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp Assoc. Prof., Sch. of Eng.,

Ongoing Assessment

Even though, I’m chairing the Chair of the policy review committee on resource criticality, this is my own individual presentation.

(Simply, the PJ has not yet completed therefore nothing concrete available.)

7

Page 8: Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment · Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment ShinsukeMurakami (PhD) smurakam@sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp Assoc. Prof., Sch. of Eng.,

Criticality Assessment PJ• METI (precisely, its branch of Agency for Natural Resource

and Energy) carried out the assessment PJ. However, the results were only disclosed as a part of huge reports for mineral resource policy. And it initiated new criticality assessment project in 2015.

• This assessment has the following characteristics:• Not only for rare metals, but common metals are target,• Explicit consideration of economic importance (vulnerability.)• Try to develop the system, which can be semi-automatically

updated with statistical data. • Hopefully, the assessment should be useful information to specify

the policy target, but also to assess the effectiveness of the introduced policies.

Ongoing Assessment

8

Page 9: Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment · Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment ShinsukeMurakami (PhD) smurakam@sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp Assoc. Prof., Sch. of Eng.,

Methodology & Data• No intention to develop the whole new methodology.

Instead, it should be comparable with other assessment in EU, US and others.

• Simply, list the factors we‘ve cared, organize them into two groups of the factors affecting supply risk and economic importance.• Supply Risk: TERP framework in Dewurf et al. (2016)

• Data will be obtained various sources. For now, the assessment only with public data might be disclosed public. In addition, we may try to put all data available no matter whether they’re confidential or not.

9

Ongoing Assessment

Page 10: Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment · Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment ShinsukeMurakami (PhD) smurakam@sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp Assoc. Prof., Sch. of Eng.,

Items should be considered. Candidate Indices

Supply Risk

T Depletion/Degradation/Accident �Trend of grades / # of Accidents

E

Market Oligopolization�HHI of Production by countries / �Mines

�HHI of Reserves by countries /�Mines.

Concentration of trade partners �HHI of imports by country

Price Volatility �Historical Volatility of Price

Stability of supply side �Change of R/P

Self sufficiencyAttributable primary production to JP companies / total primary inputs

R EOL recyclingEOL scraps share in total inputs for materialproduction

P Governance of Trade Partners WGI_HHI

Supply Risk Indicatorsbased on TERP concept proposed in the work of Dewulf et al. (2016)

10

Ongoing Assessment

Page 11: Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment · Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment ShinsukeMurakami (PhD) smurakam@sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp Assoc. Prof., Sch. of Eng.,

Example

11

Ongoing Assessment

0.32 0.28

0.25 0.23

0.17

0.10 0.06

0.03 0.01 0.01

-0.01 -0.01 -0.01 -0.05 -0.06 -0.07 -0.08

-0.10 -0.11 -0.12 -0.12

-0.25 -0.27 -0.31 -0.32 -0.32 -0.34

-0.40 -0.43

-0.50

-0.40

-0.30

-0.20

-0.10

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

W Li Zr Fe Ga Cu Pb Co Zn In Mn Sb Sr Pd Mo Pt Ta Sn Ti Al V Cr Ge P C Ni F Mg Nb

�����SR�

EU a

pp

roa

ch a

pp

lied

to J

P d

ata

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.91

0.89 0.87 0.87 0.86

0.79 0.78 0.78 0.74

0.67

0.58

0.00 0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

Re Ta In Nb Zr Sr Ga Co Mn Cr K P Si F C Li Rh Mo Zn Ti REE Ni Ge Sb Fe Pt W Sn Mg Pd V Cu Pb Al

��������

EOL(

End

of L

ife) -

RR

Before starting our own assessment, we applied EU SR approach to our own data. (However, we do not have substitutes information for now.)

Just as an example, EOL-RR dataset is shown here. Biggest issue is the denominator, the demand. We used the demand of the inputs to material production. Of course, data quality for some elements is problem.

Page 12: Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment · Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment ShinsukeMurakami (PhD) smurakam@sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp Assoc. Prof., Sch. of Eng.,

Not integrated, but…

12

Ongoing Assessment

Page 13: Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment · Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment ShinsukeMurakami (PhD) smurakam@sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp Assoc. Prof., Sch. of Eng.,

Conclusion• Japan has really long history of supply risk assessment as

unfortunately resource-poor economy depending manufacturing industry.• Mainly to support policy making such as, stockpiling, funding for R&D works,

even recycling scheme development.

• However, its methodology was not necessarily systematic nor quantitative.

• Right now, it seriously considers to develop more stable/sustainable assessment system.

• Vulnerability part is a huge task left untouched. Also, we need to find out some method to quantify the followings;• # of accidents: Text mining of news/SNS? (Space for international

collaboration?)• substitutability: If Japanese material industry/academia is really good, why

not asking them?

13

Page 14: Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment · Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment ShinsukeMurakami (PhD) smurakam@sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp Assoc. Prof., Sch. of Eng.,

Supplement

14

Page 15: Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment · Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment ShinsukeMurakami (PhD) smurakam@sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp Assoc. Prof., Sch. of Eng.,

����

����- ���<95;8II=�� �����

!"#$%& =1)*+,-

.(0+,23-4 − 0+,2

0+,23-4)

!"#$%&: ��$��/�� �R<0/ �0R=0-(*0+,2 > t�.&'2$�i/$��<�!"�=�Millhead�$�/ �-���/ �%1) : �!"�3��)2$�/� ������NA���������

���������HHI)

!8#9.,;;< = *+,-

.=8#9.,+>

!8#9.,;;<: ��#3:;7-(*���=8#9.,+ > $�i<:;7/��� �.%+,0i=/�!"���654 <0<s<1=) : �!"�3��)2$�<=/� ������NA������������

Page 16: Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment · Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment ShinsukeMurakami (PhD) smurakam@sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp Assoc. Prof., Sch. of Eng.,

�&���

����1!���LE;K?IIM

��������������

!"#$%&.()*. =250/

0$12

3

(5$ − ̅5)9

!"#$%&.()*.: �3D>CI<JGHA:IA:L��M5$ O �i��2(*7��)53���� � � �

;$ �!i��������),�<5 �-%�*������5$�'+ // : !� #��LN�'.6NBK@1+0-3BK@��M

���� ����HHI�

!#&=.,??@ = 0$12

3

A#&=.,$9

!#&=.,??@: �%8FK>1+.���A#&=.,$ O &�iL�FK>3���!�2'/04i�M3�"$��=;9 L0<s<1M ���FK>/ : �"$�8�,7&�L�M3� �(#$"�NA �����0�����.

5$ = BCD&("E"EFG

) ̅5 = 23∑$123 5$

Page 17: Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment · Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment ShinsukeMurakami (PhD) smurakam@sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp Assoc. Prof., Sch. of Eng.,

����

�!��6'���EB>DAIIF

�������

!"#$%&'( =*+,+/ *+./0,+./0

!"#$%&'(: �������*+ G H�7.0;�()�8��%+E$��#F,+ : H�7.0;�()�8��+E� +G$��#F

����

!#"234+,667 = 8#9/

$:#"234+.,#<

!#"234+.,667: *�+<CD@613 ��:#"234+.,# G ,�iECD@8 ��'�7-459iF8�()�*�E��/:&3��F?>=

E0<s<1F= : �()�<*�2;"�8,�EF8� ������NA������������

Page 18: Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment · Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment ShinsukeMurakami (PhD) smurakam@sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp Assoc. Prof., Sch. of Eng.,

�/���

�&��D/���WRMVPIIX

����

!"#$%$&# =()*+

,-./#012$!"#$%$&#: ���15#()*+ Y ����C 2AKJONUQS)���E156W2015���03"+�TVOX

�?@GC��@B)ONUQSH�$ 7E�6C?I=�(@B)ONUQSH-9�!)F;@>

,-./#012$ : ):'6����$8*2�2015�%):'6��#(07!+2�9������1���5�

�������

!*+.+".$. =5*+

,-./#012$

!*+.+".$.: ��,�815# W0<R<1� �R>1� ��R=1��5*+ Y �*�'�E$%6W2015�%���� �&-�1"������4.� ��,3�,-./#012$ : �03"E����<.6W2015���03"E�:�)$%6Y+�TVOX

�4��L;@

Page 19: Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment · Brief History of Japanese Criticality Assessment ShinsukeMurakami (PhD) smurakam@sys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp Assoc. Prof., Sch. of Eng.,

�����

��� �����,(!+%II-���������

!"#$.&&$ = ()*+

,-./)�0123.,)5

!"#$.&&$: ����"'&*$� -./) . i�����"'&*$� ,PV.EST.2016�)+$-

�PV.EST.Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism: Estimate

0123.,) : ������i����������#! ,2015��������)+$-