Upload
editor
View
232
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
1/43
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO DIVISION
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN
CITIZENS, INC. (LULAC) Plaintiff,
v. Civil Number EP:12-cv-0296-FM ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
TEXAS LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, LINDA CHAVEZ, Individually, BEA MARTINEZ, Individually, and JOEY CARDENAS, Individually
Defendants,
DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT,RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT, AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
COMES NOW Defendants, FLORINDA CHAVEZ, INDIVIDUALLY, BEATRICE
MARTINEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND JOE CARDENAS, III INDIVIDUALLY, by and through
their undersigned attorneys of record and, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
57, 60, and 65 file this, their Motion for Declaratory Judgment, Relief From Judgment and
Preliminary Injunction. For cause of action, Defendants would show unto the Court the
following:
I.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. The underlying dispute involved federal and state law trademark claims made by
the Plaintiff against Defendants. Plaintiffs basic claim was that Defendants had created a
separate entity (Texas League of United Latin American Citizens) that allegedly caused a
likelihood of confusion with Plaintiff.
2. On or about December 19, 2012, the Parties entered into an Agreed Judgment in
which Defendants agreed to abandon the use of the defunct non-profit corporation, abandon any
fundraising efforts on behalf of the defunct non-profit corporation, and abandon identifying
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 1 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
2/43
2
themselves as officers of the defunct non-profit corporation. In all respects, Defendants
maintained the good-faith belief that their dispute with Plaintiff had been resolved without any
lingering disagreements or controversies.
3. As the Court is aware, there was a dispute regarding the ability of Florinda
Chavez, Joe Cardenas, III, and Beatrice Martinezs ability to run for a State elected office and for
a National Office within National LULAC. This Court ruled on August 9, 2013, Document 45,
that the Agreed Judgment that was entered on December 20, 2013, Document 26, does not
preclude Defendants from seeking or holding elected State office or for a National Office within
National LULAC organization.4. After this ruling by the Honorable Court, National LULAC convened a hearing on
October 5, 2013 in Washington D.C. to hear a complaint against the Defendants based upon the
Judgment that was entered in this case. This hearing was to determine on whether the
Defendants should be removed or impeached based upon the same facts as alleged in the
Complaint in this litigation and because of National LULAC prevailing in this litigation.1
National LULAC was once again attempting to prevent these Defendants from continuing their
membership within National LULAC based upon this Judgment entered by the Court.
5. Defendant Joe Cardenas, III has been expelled as a member of National LULAC
based upon the Judgment that was entered. This Judgment did not allow National LULAC to
expel him from their membership. There are no words, phrases, or language contained in this
1 See the attached Declarations of Joe Cardenas, III as Exhibit 1, Florinda Chavez as Exhibit 2, and BeatriceMartinez as Exhibit 3, wherein the basis of the facts for the hearing to remove or impeach these three were: LindaChavez who was removed from the office of State Director by the Board on June 30, 2012, convened an emergencyState meeting of some Texas LULAC Councils on July 21, 2012, with the support and acquiescence of the other twoindividuals, i.e. Joe Cardenas, III and Beatrice Martinez. The intent of this meeting was to start another organizationnamed Texas State LULAC. Thereafter, National LULAC filed judicial action against the three individuals and
prevailed.)
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 2 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
3/43
3
Judgment that would allow National LULAC to expel Joe Cardenas, III from their membership.
Defendants Florinda Chavez and Beatrice Martinez were not expelled at the National LULAC
meeting but based upon the action taken by the Texas State Legal Advisor at a State LULAC
board meeting believe they have been expelled. The Defendants have been prejudiced in that,
through the fraudulent misrepresentations and improper use of the Final Judgment, they have
been removed from National LULAC or in the alternative there has been an attempt to have them
removed and/or expelled from National LULAC.
II.
ARGUMENT & AUTHORITIES
A. Request for Declaratory Judgment6. Pursuant to Rule 57 and the Declaratory Judgment Act, Defendants contend that a
substantial controversy exists between the Parties herein and that said Parties maintain adverse
legal interests of sufficient immediacy and reality to warrant the issuance of a declaratory
judgment.2 The Fifth Circuit has held that a court may issue a declaratory judgment to establish
the existing rights, status, or other legal relationships of parties.3 This Court has jurisdiction to
adjudicate the existing right of the Parties because it entered the Final Judgment that is currently
being misconstrued by Plaintiffs agents and representatives.
7. In the present dispute, Defendants aver that Plaintiff, through its agents and
representatives, are distorting the Final Judgment rendered by this Court for an improper
purpose. More specifically, Defendants contend that Plaintiff, through its agents and
representatives, has, in the past and in the present, wrongly claimed that they are to be removed
2SeeFED.R.CIV.P. 57;seealso Golden v. Zwickler, 394 U.S. 103, 108 (1969).3See Brister v. Faulkner, 214 F.3d 675, 68 (5 thCir. 2000).
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 3 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
4/43
4
and/or expelled from National LULAC on the basis of the underlying facts of this litigation and
the Judgment that was entered in this cause.
8. Defendants seek a speedy hearing on their request for declaratory relief.
Defendants seek reasonable and necessary attorneys fees and taxable costs of court as provided
by Rule 57 and the Declaratory Judgment Act.
B. Request for Relief From Judgment9. Pleading in the main and in the alternative, Defendants submit their Motion for
Relief From Judgment pursuant to Rule 60.4 Rule 60 allows a party to seek relief from a
judgment or order based upon, inter alia, fraud, misrepresentation, and misconduct; or asatisfied, released, or discharged judgment; because applying a judgment prospectively is no
longer equitable; or for any other reason that justifies relief. Defendants aver that Plaintiff has
engaged in fraud, misrepresentation and misconduct by misusing the Final Judgment for an
improper purpose for which Defendants never agreed. Defendants further aver that the they have
complied with all the terms and conditions of the Final Judgment and that it has been satisfied,
released and/or discharged such that it cannot be used for any further purpose including to expel
the Defendants as members of National LULAC. Defendants aver that application of the Final
Judgment for any future purpose is no longer equitable. Finally, as Defendants contend that their
predicament justifies relief.
C. Request for Preliminary Injunction
10. Due to the actions of Plaintiff, Defendants request that the Court issue a
Preliminary Injunction pursuant to Rule 65 to prevent Plaintiff from expelling the Defendants as
members of LULAC. In the alternative, Defendants request the court issue an order voiding any
4See FED.R.CIV.P. 60;see Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.S. 203, 215 (1997).
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 4 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
5/43
5
action taken by National LULAC to expel and/or to remove these Defendants as members of
National LULAC
11. Defendants have annexed to this motion their sworn declarations and other
evidence showing by clear and convincing evidence that they have suffered immediate prejudice
because of Plaintiffs actions. These Declarations are incorporated by reference as if fully set
forth herein.5
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendants, FLORINDA CHAVEZ,
INDIVIDUALLY, BEATRICE MARTINEZ, INDIVIDUALLY and JOE CARDENAS, III
INDIVIDUALLY, respectfully pray that the Court grant their requested relief, either at law or inequity, to which they may show themselves to be justly entitled.
Respectfully submitted,
GALE, WILSON & SNCHEZ, P.L.L.C.ROBERT W. WILSON, ESQ.MARK ANTHONY SNCHEZ, ESQ.115 East Travis Street, 19thFloorSan Antonio, Texas 78205Telephone: (210) 222-8899Telecopier: (210) 222-9256ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
By: /s/ ROBERT W.WILSONROBERT W. WILSON, ESQ.TEXAS STATE BAR NO. 00794868MARK ANTHONY SNCHEZ, ESQ.TEXAS STATE BAR NO. 00795857
5SeeExhibit 1, Declaration of Joe Cardenas, III, dated December 27, 2013; SeeExhibit 2, Declaration of FlorindaChavez, dated December 27, 2013; and SeeExhibit 3, Declaration of Beatrice Martinez, dated December 27, 2013.
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 5 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
6/43
6
NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING
The undersigned counsel hereby certifies that he has electronically submitted for filing atrue and correct copy of the above and foregoing in accordance with the Electronic Case Files
System of the Western District of Texas on the 14th
day of January, 2014.
By: /S/ROBERT W.WILSONROBERT W. WILSON, ESQ.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document has beenprovided to counsel for Plaintiff on this the 14 thday of January, 2014, as follows:
Mr. Luis Roberto Vera, Jr. [ ] First Class MailThe Law Offices of Luis Roberto Vera, Jr. [ ] Facsimile; 210-225-2060111 Soledad, Suite 1325 [ ] CM,RRRSan Antonio, Texas 78205 [ XX ] E-Mail [email protected]
Mr. Ray Velarde [ ] First Class MailAttorney at Law [ ] Facsimile; 1-(915)-542-23411216 Montana Ave. [ ] CM,RRREl Paso, Texas 79902 [ XX ] E-Mail [email protected]
Mr. Manuel G. Escobar, Jr. [ ] First Class MailAttorney at Law [ ] Facsimile; 210-212-5653201 West Poplar [ ] CM,RRRSan Antonio, Texas 78212 [ XX ] E-Mail [email protected]
By: /S/ROBERT W.WILSONROBERT S. WILSON
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 6 of 43
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
7/43EXHIBIT "1" 00009
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 7 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
8/43EXHIBIT "1" 00009
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 8 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
9/43EXHIBIT "1" 00009
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 9 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
10/43EXHIBIT "A" 00009
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 10 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
11/43EXHIBIT "A" 00010
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 11 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
12/43EXHIBIT "A" 00010
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 12 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
13/43EXHIBIT "A" 00010
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 13 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
14/43EXHIBIT "B" 00010
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 14 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
15/43EXHIBIT "B" 00010
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 15 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
16/43EXHIBIT "B" 00010
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 16 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
17/43EXHIBIT "B" 00010
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 17 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
18/43EXHIBIT "B" 00010
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 18 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
19/43EXHIBIT "C" 00010
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 19 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
20/43EXHIBIT "2" 00010
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 20 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
21/43EXHIBIT "2" 00011
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 21 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
22/43EXHIBIT "2" 00011
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 22 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
23/43EXHIBIT "A" 00011
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 23 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
24/43EXHIBIT "A" 00011
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 24 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
25/43EXHIBIT "A" 00011
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 25 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
26/43EXHIBIT "A" 00011
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 26 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
27/43EXHIBIT "B" 00011
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 27 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
28/43EXHIBIT "B" 00011
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 28 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
29/43EXHIBIT "B" 00011
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 29 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
30/43EXHIBIT "B" 00011
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 30 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
31/43EXHIBIT "B" 00012
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 31 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
32/43EXHIBIT "3" 00012
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 32 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
33/43EXHIBIT "3" 00012
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 33 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
34/43EXHIBIT "3" 00012
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 34 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
35/43EXHIBIT "A" 00012
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 35 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
36/43EXHIBIT "A" 00012
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 36 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
37/43EXHIBIT "A" 00012
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 37 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
38/43EXHIBIT "A" 00012
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 38 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
39/43EXHIBIT "B" 00012
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 39 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
40/43EXHIBIT "B" 00012
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 40 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
41/43EXHIBIT "B" 00013
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 41 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
42/43EXHIBIT "B" 00013
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 42 of 43
8/13/2019 Chavez Martinez Cardenas v LULAC Case
43/43
Case 3:12-cv-00296-FM Document 46 Filed 01/14/14 Page 43 of 43