Upload
apocalypto-statum
View
230
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
1/63
The Organic Chemistry of
Enzyme-Catalyzed Reactions
Revised Edition
Professor Richard B. SilvermanDepartment of Chemistry
Department of Biochemistry, MolecularBiology, and Cell Biology
Northestern !niversity
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
2/63
"he #rganic Chemistry ofEn$yme%Cataly$ed Reactions
Chapter &
En$ymes as Catalysts
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
3/63
'or pu(lished data regarding any en$yme see)http)**.(renda%en$ymes.info*
NomenclatureEnzyme Names
EC Number
Common/ Recommended Name Systematic Name Synonyms CAS Registry Number
Reaction & Specificity Pathway Catalysed Reaction
Reaction Type Natural Substrates and Products Substrates and Products Substrates Natural Substrate Products Natural Product Inhibitors Coactors !etals/ Ions Acti"ating Compounds #igands
Functional Parameters $m %alue $i %alue pI %alue Turno"er Number Speciic Acti"ity p& 'ptimum p& Range Temperature 'ptimum Temperature Range
Isolation & Preparation Puri(cation Cloned Renatured Crystallization
Organism- related information 'rganism
Source Tissue #ocalization
Stability p& Stability
Temperature Stability )eneral Stability 'rganic Sol"ent Stability '*idation Stability Storage Stability
Enzyme Structure Se+uence/ SwissProt lin, -.Structure/ P.0 lin, !olecular 1eight Subunits Posttranslational !odiication
Disease & References .isease Reerences
pplication & Engineering
Engineering Application
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
4/63
+hat are en$ymes, and ho do they or-
'irst /isolation0 of an en$yme in &122 Ethanol added to a3ueous e4tract of malt
5ielded heat%la(ile precipitate that as
utili$ed to hydroly$e starch to solu(le sugar6precipitate no non as amylase
&171 % 89hne coined term enzyme % means/in yeast0
&1:1 % Duclau4 proposed all en$ymes shouldhave suffi4 /ase0
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
5/63
En$ymes % natural proteins that cataly$e
chemical reactions 'irst en$yme recogni$ed as protein as ;ac(ean urease
Crystalli$ed in &:
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
6/63
En$ymes have molecular eights of severalthousand to several million, yet cataly$e
transformations on molecules as small ascar(on dio4ide and nitrogen
'unction (y loering transition%state energiesand energetic intermediates and (y raisingthe ground%state energy
Many different hypotheses proposed for hoen$ymes cataly$e reactions
Common lin of hypotheses) en$yme%cataly$ed reaction alays initiated (y theformation of an enzyme-substrate ?or E •SAcomplex in a small cavity called the active site
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
7/63
&1: % Lock-and-key hypothesis % 'ischer
proposed en$yme is the loc into hich thesu(strate ?the eyA fits Does not rationali$e certain o(served
phenomena)
Compounds having less (uly su(stituents oftenfail to (e su(stratesSome compounds ith more (uly su(stituents
(ind more tightly
Some en$ymes that cataly$e reactions (eteento su(strates do not (ind one su(strate untilthe other one is (ound
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
8/63
&:@1 % Induced-fit hypothesis proposed (y8oshland)
+hen a su(strate (egins to (ind to an en$yme,interactions induce a conformational change
in the en$ymeResults in a change of the en$yme from a lo
catalytic form to a high catalytic form
nduced%fit hypothesis re3uires a fle4i(le activesite
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
9/63
Concept of fle4i(le active site stated earlier (yPauling ?&:=A)
ypothesi$ed that an en$yme is a fle4i(letemplate that is most complementary tosu(strates at the transition state rather thanat the ground state
"herefore, the su(strate does not (ind mosteffectively in the E•S comple4
s reaction proceeds, en$yme conforms (etter
to the transition%state structureTransition-state stabilization results in rate
enhancement
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
10/63
#nly a do$en or so amino acid residues maymae up the active site
#nly to or three may (e involved directly insu(strate (inding and*or catalysis
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
11/63
+hy is it necessary for en$ymes to (e so large-
Most effective (inding of su(strate resultsfrom close pacing of atoms ithin protein
Remainder of en$yme outside active site isre3uired to maintain integrity of the active site
May serve to channel the su(strate into theactive site
ctive site aligns the or(itals of su(strates andcatalytic groups on the en$yme optimally forconversion to the transition%state structure%%called orbital steering
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
12/63
En$yme catalysis characteri$ed (y tofeatures) specificity and rate acceleration
ctive site contains amino acid residues andcofactors that are responsi(le for the a(ovefeatures
Cofactor , also called a coenzyme, is anorganic molecule or metal ion that is essentialfor the catalytic action
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
13/63
Specificity of En$yme%Cataly$ed Reactions "o types of specificity) ?&A Specificity of (inding
and ?
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
14/63
K s =
E + S E . E . E + P
k 2
k -1
k 1
k -1
k 1
S P
Scheme &.&
k on
k off
Michaeliscomple4
+hen k < FF k %&,
k
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
15/63
aEigen, M.6 ammes, G.G. !d" Enzymol" 1963, #$ , &.
Table 1.1. Examles of T!rno"er #!mbersa
Enzyme T!rno"er n!mber
k cat $s-1%
papain &>car(o4ypeptidase &><
acetylcholinesterase&>
2
inases &>2
dehydrogenases &>2
aminotransferases &>2
car(onic anhydrase &>=
supero4ide dismutase &>=
catalase &>7
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
16/63
K m is the concentration of su(strate thatproduces half the ma4imum rate
K m is a dissociation constant , so the smallerthe K m the stronger the interaction (eteen Eand S
k cat*K m is the specificity constant % used toran an en$yme according to ho good it isith different su(strates
!pper limit for is rate of diffusion ?&>: M%&s%&AK m
k cat
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
17/63
o does an en$yme release product soefficiently given that the en$yme (inds the
transition state structure a(out &>&<
times moretightly than it (inds the su(strate or products-
fter (ond (reaing ?or maingA at transitionstate, interactions that match in the transition%state sta(ili$ing comple4 are no longer present.
"herefore products are poorly (ound, resulting in
e4pulsion. s (onds are (roen*made, changes in electronic
distri(ution can occur, generating a repulsiveinteraction, leading to e4pulsion of products
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
18/63
E S comple4'igure &.&#on-co"alent interactions
electrostatic
?ionicAC
O
O
+
RNH 3
ion-dipole R
C NH3
R'
Oδ
δ +
διπολε−διπολε Ρ
Χ Ο
Ρ∋
Οδ
δδ δ
Η
Η−βονδ ινγ
Ο
ΡΧ Ο Η
Ο
Η
χηαργετρανσφερ
Α
∆
∆
Α
ηψδροπηοβιχ
ΟΡΧ
Ο
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
19/63
HGI J %R"lnK e3
f K e3 J >.>&, HGI of %@.@ cal*mol neededto shift K e3 to &>>
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
20/63
Specific 'orces nvolved inES Comple4 'ormation
'igure &.<
NH3
O
OH
CH
3
COCH
2
CH
2
NMe
3
+
+
δ
−
δ
+
δ
−
διπολε−διπολεδ
+
ιον−διπολε
Ο
Ο
ιονιχ
E4amples of ionic, ion%dipole, and dipole%dipoleinteractions. "he avy line represents theen$yme active site
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
21/63
%(onds
type of dipole%dipoleinteraction (eteen K%
and 5) ?N, #A
'igure &.2
%(onds
ydrogen (onding in the secondary structure ofproteins) α%heli4 and β%sheet.
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
22/63
Charge "ransfer Comple4es
+hen a molecule ?or groupA that is a goodelectron donor comes into contact ith amolecule ?or groupA that is a good electronacceptor, donor may transfer some of itscharge to the acceptor
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
23/63
ydropho(ic nteractions
+hen to nonpolar groups, each surrounded(y ater molecules, approach each other, theater molecules (ecome disordered in anattempt to associate ith the ater moleculesof the approaching group
ncreases entropy, resulting in decrease inthe free energy ?∆%° J ∆& °%T ∆S°A
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
24/63
van der +aals 'orces
toms have a temporary nonsymmetricaldistri(ution of electron density resulting ingeneration of a temporary dipole
"emporary dipoles of one molecule induceopposite dipoles in the approaching molecule
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
25/63
Binding Specificity
Can (e a(solute or can (e very (road Specificity of racemates may involve ES comple4
formation ith only one enantiomer or EScomple4 formation ith (oth enantiomers, (utonly one is converted to product
En$ymes accomplish this (ecause they are chiralmolecules ?mammalian en$ymes consist of only
L%amino acidsA
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
26/63
Binding specificity of enantiomers
Scheme &.<
EnzL + ( R,S ) EnzL + EnzL R S
diastereomers
Resolution of a racemic mi4ture
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
27/63
Binding energy for ES comple4 formation
ith one enantiomer may (e much higherthan that ith the other enantiomer
Both ES comple4es may form, (ut only oneES comple4 may lead to product formation
Enantiomer that does not turn over is said toundergo nonproductie binding
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
28/63
Steric hindrance to (inding of enantiomers
'igure &.
OOCNH
3
H
OOC NH3
H
A B
S R
Leu
Basis for enantioselectivity in en$ymes
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
29/63
Reaction Specificity
!nlie reactions in solution, en$ymes can shospecificity for chemically identical protons
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
30/63
'igure &.@
R R'
R R'
Ha
Hb
B
-
enzyme
En$yme specificity for chemically identicalprotons. R and R′ on the en$yme are
groups that interact specifically ith R andR′, respectively, on the su(strate.
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
31/63
Rate cceleration
n en$yme has numerous opportunities toinvoe catalysis)
Sta(ili$ation of the transition state
Desta(ili$ation of the ES comple4 Desta(ili$ation of intermediates
Because of these opportunities, multiple
steps may (e involved
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
32/63
'igure &.= &>&>%&>& fold typically
E+S
E+P
ESEP
Catalyzed
Uncatalyzed
Reaction Coordinate
A
Uncatalyzed
Enzyme Catalyzed
Reaction Coordinate
B
Effect of ?A a chemical catalyst and?BA an en$yme on activation energy
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
33/63
En$yme catalysis does not alter the e3uili(riumof a reversi(le reaction6 it accelerates attainmentof the e3uili(rium
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
34/63
a "aen from Rad$ica, .6 +olfenden, R. Science 199&, #'( , :>.( "aen from orton, .R.6 Moran, L..6 #chs, R.S.6 Ran, .D.6 Scrimgeour,8.G. )rinciples of *iochemistry 6 Neil Patterson) Engleood Cliffs, N, &::2.
Table 1.'. Examles of Enzymatic Rate (cceleration
Enzyme #onenzymatic rate
)non $s-1%
Enzymatic rate
)cat $s-1%
Rate acceleration )cat *)non
cyclophilina %< &.2 4 &>B .= 4 &>@
car(onic anhydrasea &.2 4 &>%& &>= 7.7 4 &>=
chorismate mutasea %@ @> &.: 4 &>=
chymotrypsin( 4 &>%: 4 &>%< &>7
triosephosphateisomerase(
= 4 &>%7 < 4 &>2 2 4 &>:
fumarase( < 4 &>%1 < 4 &>2 &>&&
etosteroid isomerasea &.7 4 &>%7 =.= 4 &>B 2.: 4 &>&&
car(o4ypeptidase a 2 4 &>%: @71 &.: 4 &>&&
adenosine deaminasea &.1 4 &>&> 27> &<
urease( 2 4 &>%&> 2 4 &>B &>&B
alaline phosphatase( &>%&@ &>< &>&7
orotidine @O%phosphatedecar(o4ylasea
%&= 2: &. 4 &>&7
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
35/63
Mechanisms of En$yme Catalysis
ppro4imation Rate enhancement (y pro4imity
En$yme serves as a template to (ind the
su(strates Reaction of en$yme%(ound su(strates
(ecomes first order
E3uivalent to increasing the concentration ofthe reacting groups
E4emplified ith nonen$ymatic model studies
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
36/63
Scheme &.2
CH3COAr
O O
CO
C
O
H3C+ CH3COO-
CH3+ ArO-
Second%order reaction of acetate itharyl acetate
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
37/63
OAr
O
O
O
-
OAr
O
O
O
-
OAr
O
O
O
-
OAr
O
O
O
O
O
-
Relative rate ( k rel
)
1 M
-1
s
-1
220 s
-1
5.1 x 10
4
s
-1
2.3 x 10
6
s
-1
1.2 x 10
7
s
-1
Decreasing rotational and
translational entropy
+ CH3
COO
-
OAr
Effective Molarity (EM)
5.1 x 10
4
M
2.3 x 10
6
M
1.2 x 10
7
M
220 M
"a(le &.2. Effect of ppro4imation on Reaction Rates
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
38/63
Covalent Catalysis
Scheme &.anchimeric assistance
Most common
Cys ?SASer ?#Ais ?imida$oleALys ?N
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
39/63
Scheme &.@
SCl
SOH
S+
1.2
HO--Cl-
nchimeric assistance (y a neigh(oring group
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
40/63
Model Reaction for Covalent Catalysis
Scheme &.=
Early evidence to support covalent catalysis
O
O
18O
O 18OCH
3C
18O
18OH
O
OH
18O18
+Ar
H2O
H2OO-
(-ArO-)
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
41/63
General cid*Base Catalysis
"his is important for any reaction in hich protontransfer occurs
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
42/63
'igure &.7catalytic triad
"he catalytic triad of α%chymotrypsin. "hedistances are as follos) d & J
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
43/63
Scheme &.7
HN
NH
NHR'
SerO
H
R1
O R2
O
R
N N H
His
-OOC Asp
Charge relay system for activation of an active%site serine residue in α%chymotrypsin
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
44/63
pK a values of amino acid side%chain groups ithinthe active site of en$ymes can (e 3uite differentfrom those in solution
Partly result of lo polarity inside of proteins
Molecular dynamics simulations shointeriors of these proteins have dielectric
constants of a(out
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
45/63
Basic group in a nonpolar environment has aloer pK a
pK a of a (ase ill fall if ad;acent to other(ases
ctive%site lysine in acetoacetate
decar(o4ylase has a pK a of @.: ?pK a insolution is &>.@A
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
46/63
"o inds of acid*(ase catalysis)
Specific acid or specific base catalysis -catalysis (y a hydronium ?2#QA or hydro4ide?#%A ion, and is determined only (y the p
%eneral acid+base catalysis % reaction rateincreases ith increasing (uffer concentrationat a constant p and ionic strength
Eff t f th ( ff t ti ?A
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
47/63
'igure &.1
Specific acid*(ase catalysis General acid*(ase catalysis
k k
[Buffer] [Buffer]
pH 7.9
pH 7.3
pH 7.9
pH 7.3
A B
Effect of the (uffer concentration on ?Aspecific acid*(ase catalysis and ?BA
general acid*(ase catalysis
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
48/63
Scheme &.1
Specific cid%Base Catalysis
O
C OEt
poornucleophile
weak electrophile
++H3C
EtOHCH3COOHH2O
ydrolysis of ethyl acetate
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
49/63
Scheme &.:
laline hydrolysis of ethyl acetate
O
COHH3C
O
COC2H5H3C
O
CO-H3C
+ +
strongnucleophile
C2H5O-
HO-
C2H5OH
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
50/63
Scheme &.&>
O
COHH3C
OH
COC2H5H3C
OH
COC2H5H3C
O
COC2H5H3C
+
+
++
strongelectrophile
H3O+
H2O
C2H5OH
cid hydrolysis of ethyl acetate
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
51/63
Scheme &.&&
B
+
H
R Y
O
H OHB:
Simultaneous acid and (ase en$yme catalysis
(ase catalysis
acid catalysis
En$ymes can utili$e acid and (asecatalysis simultaneously
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
52/63
Simultaneous acid*(ase catalysis is the reason for
ho en$ymes are capa(le of deprotonating eacar(on acids
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
53/63
Scheme &.&<
Simultaneous acid and (ase en$yme catalysisin the enoli$ation of mandelic acid
Ph
HaHOOHb
O
PhO-
O
HaHO
Ph
HaHOOHb
OHc
Ph
HaHOOHb
OHcPh
HO
O-
OHb
Ph
HO
OHc
OHb
pKE = 18.6
+
+
pKa ~ 7.4pKa = 6.6
± Hc+ ± Ha+
pKE = 15.4
pKa = 22.0
± Ha+
pKa ~ -8
± Hc+
pKa = 3.4
± Hb+
1.3 1.4
1.51.6
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
54/63
Lo,-barrier hydrogen bonds % short ?F
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
55/63
X R
H
O
H
B:
BH
X R
HO
:B
B+H
R
O
R = H, alkyl, SR'
O–
OX
H H
M+
BH
O–
OX H
M+
B
O
O
H
M+
BH
B
H
B
B:
B:
BH
-HX
A
B
Scheme &.&2
lo%(arrier%(ond
/ea0(ase
/strong0acid
/strong0(ase
/ea0 acid
lo%(arrier%(ond
stronger acidneeded
#ne%(asemechanismsyn%elimination
car(o4ylic acids
&,%elimination of β%su(stituted ?A aldehydes,etones, thioesters and ?BA car(o4ylic acids
"o%(asemechanismanti %elimination
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
56/63
Scheme &.&
ElcB mechanism % not relevant
X R
H
O
H
X R
O
B+H
R
O
B:
Base cataly$ed &,%elimination of β%su(stitutedcar(onyl compounds via an enolate
intermediate ?ElcB mechanismA
Needs acid or metal catalysis
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
57/63
lternative to Lo%Barrier ydrogen Bond
Scheme &.&@
R
H
O
H
R' R
O
R'
H
B: B+
H
Electrostatic en$yme catalysis in enoli$ation
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
58/63
Electrostatic Catalysis
Scheme &.&=
o4yanion hole
HN
NH
HN
NH
NH
HN
NH
HN
O
O
O O
OO
O
R"
R'
RR"
R'
R
O
++
also could be aH bond or dipole
Electrostatic sta(ili$ation of the transition state
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
59/63
Desolvation
E4poses su(strate to loer dielectric
constant environment E4poses ater%(onded charged groups for
electrostatic catalysis
Desta(ili$es the ground state
"he removal of ater molecules at the active siteon su(strate (inding
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
60/63
Scheme &.&7
Strain Energy
k 1.+
k 1., J &>1
O
P
O HO
-OP
O
O- OO--O
O
P
O
O--O
CH3CH3
OP
O-O
-O
CH3
CH3
HO
1.7 1.8
-OH -OH
laline hydrolysis of phosphodiesters
nduced 'it ypothesis
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
61/63
'igure &.:
nduced 'it ypothesisputting strain energy into the su(strate
E ti Eff t f E C t l i
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
62/63
'igure &.&>
Energetic Effect of En$yme Catalysis
mportance of ground state desta(ili$ation
Mechanisms of En$yme Catalysis % porpho(ilinogen synthase
8/19/2019 Chp1 (2).ppt
63/63
H
Lys252
NH2
NH2
O
COO-
NH2
O
COO-
NH
NH-Lys252
COO-
NH2
COO-B:
NH
NH-Lys252
COO-
NH2
COO-
NH
COO-COO-
H
NH2
NH-Lys252
B
B:
H
:B
NH
COO- COO-
NH2
HNH
COO- COO-
NH2
+ +
..
+
+
+
..
:
ZnB(Cys)4
Lys252
NH
NH2
O
COO-
ZnB(Cys)4
H :B
Lys252
NH
NH2OH
COO-
ZnB(Cys)4
Lys252
NH
H2N
COO-
NH2
O
COO- Lys252
NH
N
COO-
HH
:B (X)3ZnA
HO
(X)3ZnA
HO
H
(X)3ZnA
HO
(X) Z
HO
(X) Zn
HO
strain energyelectrostatic catalysis
approximationcovalent catalysis
base catalysis
strain energyelectrostatic catalysis
base catalysis
base catalysis
acid catalysis
base catalysis
base catalysis
approximation
approximation
(X3)ZnA (X3)ZnA