2
7/25/2019 Critical appraisal RJ blok 17.docx http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/critical-appraisal-rj-blok-17docx 1/2 1. Was there a clear statement of the aims of the research?  YES From the beginning it has been stated that the aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of nosocomial UTIs to investigate risk factors for !athogen and ESBL positivity among nosocomial UTI !atients. ". Is a #ualitati$e methodology a!!ro!riate? %&'( TE)) *ecause the method that they used was gi$ing #uestionnaires to the hos!itals and from the result of the #uestionnaires they inter$iewed the !atients but we didn(t +now what is the content of the #uestionnaire and the #uestions they ha$e been as+ed to the !atient. ,. Was the research design a!!ro!riate to addres the aims of the research?  YES  They !ic+ed the right range of the !atients from the gender to the ages. &nd also they ha$e classi-ed each gru! ty!e of the !atients and !atient(s condition such as the origin of the !atient(s hos!ital wether in ward I%U the !atient came from the ty!e of the rooms the !atient li$ing on etc.  This conditions is essential for the study of their research. /. Was the recruitment strategy a!!ro!riate to the aims of the research? %&'(T TE)) *ecause we don(t +now what was the #uestions in the #uestionnaire and also the #uestions in the inter$iew. So the way they !ic+ed their !atients recruitment is only +nown by the inclusion criteria but not for the details of the #uestionnaire. 0. Was the data collected in a way that addressed the research issue?  YES  The data they were collecting is all about the UTI and it(s detailed ris+ factor . 2as the relationshi! between researcher and !artici!ants been ade#uately considered? '3 *ecause the way the researchers collecting theirs !artici!ants is !ure from the willingness from each of res!ecti$e hos!itals and their !atients. 4. 2a$e ethical issue been ta+en into consideration?  YES  They had their study a!!ro$ed by the local ethics commitee of the contry. 5. Was the data analysis su6ciently rigorous?  YES  The data(s com!leteness is #uite e7cellent. They collected detailed information regarding the !atienttheir history and theirs surrounding conditions 8i.e rooms catheteri9ation history of o!eration etc:

Critical appraisal RJ blok 17.docx

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Critical appraisal RJ blok 17.docx

7/25/2019 Critical appraisal RJ blok 17.docx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/critical-appraisal-rj-blok-17docx 1/2

1. Was there a clear statement of the aims of the research? YESFrom the beginning it has been stated that the aim of the study was to

determine the prevalence of nosocomial UTIs to investigate risk

factors for !athogen and ESB L positivity among nosocomial UTI

!atients.

". Is a #ualitati$e methodology a!!ro!riate?%&'( TE))*ecause the method that they used was gi$ing #uestionnaires to the

hos!itals and from the result of the #uestionnaires they inter$iewed the

!atients but we didn(t +now what is the content of the #uestionnaire and

the #uestions they ha$e been as+ed to the !atient.

,. Was the research design a!!ro!riate to addres the aims of the research? YES

 They !ic+ed the right range of the !atients from the gender to the ages.&nd also they ha$e classi-ed each gru! ty!e of the !atients and !atient(s

condition such as the origin of the !atient(s hos!ital wether in ward I%U

the !atient came from the ty!e of the rooms the !atient li$ing on etc.

 This conditions is essential for the study of their research.

/. Was the recruitment strategy a!!ro!riate to the aims of the research?%&'(T TE))*ecause we don(t +now what was the #uestions in the #uestionnaire and

also the #uestions in the inter$iew. So the way they !ic+ed their !atients

recruitment is only +nown by the inclusion criteria but not for the details

of the #uestionnaire.

0. Was the data collected in a way that addressed the research issue? YES The data they were collecting is all about the UTI and it(s detailed ris+

factor

. 2as the relationshi! between researcher and !artici!ants been ade#uately

considered?'3*ecause the way the researchers collecting theirs !artici!ants is !ure from

the willingness from each of res!ecti$e hos!itals and their !atients.

4. 2a$e ethical issue been ta+en into consideration? YES They had their study a!!ro$ed by the local ethics commitee of the contry.

5. Was the data analysis su6ciently rigorous? YES The data(s com!leteness is #uite e7cellent. They collected detailed

information regarding the !atienttheir history and theirs surrounding

conditions 8i.e rooms catheteri9ation history of o!eration etc:

Page 2: Critical appraisal RJ blok 17.docx

7/25/2019 Critical appraisal RJ blok 17.docx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/critical-appraisal-rj-blok-17docx 2/2

;. Is there a clear statement of -ndings? YES The -ndings were described

1<.2ow $aluable is the research?=uite $aluable because it could !redict which ty!e of !atients that will

!ossibly get the UTI nosocomial and determine the ste!s to !re$enting the

e7tending of the UTI nosocomial(s transmission