Upload
andika-fajar
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/25/2019 Critical appraisal RJ blok 17.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/critical-appraisal-rj-blok-17docx 1/2
1. Was there a clear statement of the aims of the research? YESFrom the beginning it has been stated that the aim of the study was to
determine the prevalence of nosocomial UTIs to investigate risk
factors for !athogen and ESB L positivity among nosocomial UTI
!atients.
". Is a #ualitati$e methodology a!!ro!riate?%&'( TE))*ecause the method that they used was gi$ing #uestionnaires to the
hos!itals and from the result of the #uestionnaires they inter$iewed the
!atients but we didn(t +now what is the content of the #uestionnaire and
the #uestions they ha$e been as+ed to the !atient.
,. Was the research design a!!ro!riate to addres the aims of the research? YES
They !ic+ed the right range of the !atients from the gender to the ages.&nd also they ha$e classi-ed each gru! ty!e of the !atients and !atient(s
condition such as the origin of the !atient(s hos!ital wether in ward I%U
the !atient came from the ty!e of the rooms the !atient li$ing on etc.
This conditions is essential for the study of their research.
/. Was the recruitment strategy a!!ro!riate to the aims of the research?%&'(T TE))*ecause we don(t +now what was the #uestions in the #uestionnaire and
also the #uestions in the inter$iew. So the way they !ic+ed their !atients
recruitment is only +nown by the inclusion criteria but not for the details
of the #uestionnaire.
0. Was the data collected in a way that addressed the research issue? YES The data they were collecting is all about the UTI and it(s detailed ris+
factor
. 2as the relationshi! between researcher and !artici!ants been ade#uately
considered?'3*ecause the way the researchers collecting theirs !artici!ants is !ure from
the willingness from each of res!ecti$e hos!itals and their !atients.
4. 2a$e ethical issue been ta+en into consideration? YES They had their study a!!ro$ed by the local ethics commitee of the contry.
5. Was the data analysis su6ciently rigorous? YES The data(s com!leteness is #uite e7cellent. They collected detailed
information regarding the !atienttheir history and theirs surrounding
conditions 8i.e rooms catheteri9ation history of o!eration etc:
7/25/2019 Critical appraisal RJ blok 17.docx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/critical-appraisal-rj-blok-17docx 2/2
;. Is there a clear statement of -ndings? YES The -ndings were described
1<.2ow $aluable is the research?=uite $aluable because it could !redict which ty!e of !atients that will
!ossibly get the UTI nosocomial and determine the ste!s to !re$enting the
e7tending of the UTI nosocomial(s transmission