Diss Caroline

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    1/91

    Diss. ETHZ No.17544

    Molecular and phenotypic diversity of wheat(Triticum aestivumL.) for winter hardiness

    A dissertation submitted to the

    ETHZURICH

    for the degree of

    DOCTOR OF SCIENCES

    presented by

    CAROLINE PLASSE

    M.Sc. in Agronomical Sciences, INPL Nancy, France

    born 12.07.1978

    Citizen of France

    accepted on the recommendation of

    Prof. Dr. P.Stamp, examiner

    Prof. Dr. B. Keller, co-examiner

    Dr. J. Leipner, co-examiner

    Zurich, 2007

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    2/91

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    3/91

    The tools of genome research may finally

    unleash the genetic potential of our wild

    and cultivated germplasm resources

    for the benefit of the society

    (Tanksley and McCouch 1997)

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    4/91

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    5/91

    I

    Table of Contents

    Summary III

    Rsum V

    List of abbreviations VII

    1 General Introduction 1

    1.1 Frost-induced damage and cellular response to low temperature ................................ 1

    1.2 Cold acclimation and winter hardiness of wheat ......................................................... 2

    1.3 Determination of frost tolerance .................................................................................. 3

    1.4 Genetic aspects of frost tolerance in wheat.................................................................. 4

    1.5 Use of genetic resources for wheat improvement........................................................ 5

    1.6 Contribution of genomic research and molecular markers to crop improvement........ 6

    1.7 Aim of the study........................................................................................................... 7

    2 Phylogenetic analysis of wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) accessions by microsatellitemarkers and parametric genetic mixture analysis 8

    2.1 Abstract ........................................................................................................................ 8

    2.2 Introduction..................................................................................................................8

    2.3 Material and Methods .................................................................................................. 92.3.1 Plant material...................................................................................................... 9

    2.3.2 Microsatellite analysis ......................................................................................10

    2.3.3 Genetic diversity assessment ............................................................................ 12

    2.4 Results........................................................................................................................ 13

    2.4.1 Microsatellite polymorphism............................................................................ 13

    2.4.2 Estimation of the number of genetic clusters and assignment of individuals topopulations........................................................................................................ 14

    2.4.3 Within and between population diversity......................................................... 16

    2.4.4 Causes of the observed population structure .................................................... 172.5 Discussion ..................................................................................................................19

    3 Analysis of winter hardiness of divergent wheat material under field conditionsusing chlorophyll fluorescence analysis 22

    3.1 Abstract ...................................................................................................................... 22

    3.2 Introduction................................................................................................................22

    3.3 Material and Methods ................................................................................................ 24

    3.3.1 Plant material and growth conditions ............................................................... 24

    3.3.2 Phenotype assessment....................................................................................... 243.4 Results........................................................................................................................ 26

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    6/91

    II

    3.4.1 Temperature conditions .................................................................................... 26

    3.4.2 Comparison of tested accessions with standard lines....................................... 27

    3.4.3 Effect of experimental season on winter survival ............................................27

    3.4.4 Time course of Fv/Fmand leaf greenness throughout the winter season .......... 28

    3.5 Discussion ..................................................................................................................32

    4 Analysis of the promoter region of the transcription factor TaCBF12 in wheataccessions of contrasting winter hardiness 35

    4.1 Abstract ...................................................................................................................... 35

    4.2 Introduction................................................................................................................35

    4.3 Material and Methods ................................................................................................ 37

    4.3.1 Primer design.................................................................................................... 37

    4.3.2 DNA analysis.................................................................................................... 37

    4.3.3 Data analysis.....................................................................................................384.4 Results........................................................................................................................ 38

    4.4.1 Sequence variability .........................................................................................38

    4.4.2 Identification of transcription regulatory elements ..........................................40

    4.5 Discussion ..................................................................................................................41

    5 Identification of sequence variant associated with freezing tolerance in wheat bycandidate gene-based and genome-wide association analyses 45

    5.1 Abstract ...................................................................................................................... 45

    5.2 Introduction................................................................................................................455.3 Material and Methods ................................................................................................ 46

    5.3.1 Plant material and growth conditions ............................................................... 46

    5.3.2 Sequence analysis .............................................................................................46

    5.3.3 Population structure and association mapping ................................................. 47

    5.3.4 False discovery rate control.............................................................................. 47

    5.4 Results........................................................................................................................ 47

    5.4.1 Comparison of haplotypes................................................................................ 47

    5.4.2 Population structure..........................................................................................48

    5.4.3 Candidate gene based association mapping...................................................... 50

    5.4.4 Genome wide association mapping ..................................................................51

    5.5 Discussion ..................................................................................................................52

    6 General Conclusions 55

    7 References 58

    8 Appendix 69

    Acknowledgements 77

    Curriculum vitae 79

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    7/91

    III

    Summary

    Wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) is cultivated on more than 240 million hectares, a larger area

    than for any other crop. Furthermore, the trade in wheat worldwide is greater than for all the

    crops combined. The intraspecific reduction of wheat genetic diversity caused by the

    development of high-yielding cultivars enhances the risk of loss of adaptation to abiotic stress

    such as frost, which periodically accounts for significant losses in the production of winter

    wheat. The use of genetic resources for improving wheat is considered to be the most

    sustainable way conserving valuable genetic material for the future. In the recent past,

    genomics emerged as the result of technical advances in molecular biological techniques and

    in bioinformatics. Genomic research can contribute to the use of genetic resources for wheatadaptation to winter hardiness as it is possible to identify alleles useful for wheat

    improvement. This project aimed to survey genetic resources for wheat winter hardiness

    improvement by investigating genetic and phenotypic diversity and by determining the

    genetic basis of frost tolerance in wheat by association mapping.

    The plant material was a set of 320 wheat accessions provided by the genebank of Agroscope

    Changins-Wdenswil (Switzerland). This material originated from 40 countries and each

    accession was genotyped at 32 loci with microsatellite (SSR) markers. The genetic diversitystudy detected a high genetic diversity. A parametric genetic mixture analysis was conducted

    to analyze the stratification. This analysis identified twelve subpopulations. Many of the

    populations consisted mainly of accessions from a certain geographic area or of a particular

    growth type.

    A subset of 103 accessions was grown under field conditions without snow cover in Jura in

    two consecutive winters. Maximum quantum efficiency of PSII primary photochemistry

    (F

    v/F

    m) and leaf greenness were determined throughout the season, and winter survival andshoot dry weight were assessed at the end of the winter. Due to low temperatures, as low as

    -29 C in both seasons, frost damage occurred in the less winter hardy accessions. The

    determination of Fv/Fm and leaf greenness enabled a classification of the accessions with

    respect to winter hardiness and revealed large phenotypic variation within the studied wheat

    accessions.

    In order to investigate the genetic basis of wheat adaptation to frost, a candidate gene-based

    and a genome-wide association study was performed in a collection of 95 wheat accessions.

    The gene TaCBF12, which codes for a transcription factor of the AP2 type, was used as

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    8/91

    IV

    candidate gene due to its positional association with the Fr-A2 locus, which is located on

    chromosome 5A and is known to be the major locus for frost tolerance in wheat. The

    sequencing of the promoter region of TaCBF12 revealed nine completely associated single

    nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) resulting in two haplotypes. The promoter region was

    found to contain several cis-acting elements of low temperature regulation. The SNPs caused

    that the two haplotypes differed in the presence, respectively absence, of two cis-acting

    elements, which are probably involved in the acclimation to low temperature. Therefore, the

    two haplotypes were tested for an association with the variation in winter hardiness. No

    association was found, suggesting a minor effect of TaCBF12on phenotypic variation in frost

    tolerance. However, a highly significant association was found between the markerXcfa2173

    on chromosome 4D and variation in the fluorescence parameterFv/Fmat the beginning of the

    winter. The identified alleles may be useful in the selection for frost tolerance during winter

    hardening of wheat.

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    9/91

    V

    Rsum

    Avec plus de 240 millions dhectares, le bl est la culture occupant la plus vaste surface dans

    le monde. Ces changes sur le march mondial sont plus importants que ceux des autres

    cultures runies. Le dveloppement de cultivars hauts rendements a entran une baisse de la

    variabilit gntique des varits cultives ce qui augmente le risque dun manque

    dadaptation aux stress abiotiques. Parmi ces stress, le gel est rgulirement responsable

    dimportantes pertes de rendement chez le bl. La caractrisation des ressources gntiques

    est un pr-requis pour leur intgration future en amlioration vgtale et la restauration de la

    diversit gntique de cette espce. Ces dernires annes, la gnomique a merg grce aux

    avances conjointes des techniques molculaires et bioinformatiques. La recherchegnomique qui permet lidentification dallles utiles lamlioration du bl, dtient le

    potentiel de contribuer lutilisation des ressources gntiques pour ladaptation du bl au

    gel. Lobjectif de ce projet est dvaluer, chez le bl, les ressources gntiques pour la

    tolrance au gel par ltude de la diversit phnotypique et par la dtermination des bases

    gntiques de la tolrance au gel au moyen de la gntique dassociation.

    Un panel de 320 accessions de bl dorigines diverses fourni par la banque de gnes de

    lAgroscope de Changins-Wdenswil (Suisse) a t utilis. Pour valuer la diversit gntiquede ce panel, chaque accession a t value au moyen de marqueurs microsatellites au niveau

    de 32 loci. Une grande diversit gntique a t mise en vidence. Une analyse dhybridation

    gntique a t mene afin de mettre en vidence la stratification. Cette analyse a permis

    lidentification de douze sous-populations. Un certain nombre de sous-populations

    rassemblaient des individus dune origine gographique donne ou dun type particulier de

    bl (hiver ou printemps).

    Un sous-ensemble de 103 accessions a t cultiv en conditions de champ, sans couvertureneigeuse, dans le Jura pendant deux hivers conscutifs. Le rendement quantique maximum de

    la photochimie de PSII (Fv/Fm) et la vert des feuilles ont t mesurs durant la saison

    hivernale ; la survie et le poids sec de la partie foliaire ont t valus la fin de lhiver. Des

    tempratures atteignant -29C pendant les deux hivers ont occasionns des dgts lis au gel

    sur les bls les moins tolrants. La dtermination du rapportFv/Fmet de la vert ont permis

    une classification des accessions en fonction de leur degr de tolrance et ont rvl une

    considrable variation phnotypique parmi les gnotypes de bl tudis.

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    10/91

    VI

    Afin dtudier les dterminants gntiques de ladaptation du bl au gel, des tudes

    dassociation par les approches gne-candidat et gnome-scan ont t menes chez une

    population de 95 accessions de bl. Le gne TaCBF12, qui code un facteur potentiel de

    transcription de type AP2, a t choisi comme gne-candidat cause de son association

    positionnelle avec le locusFr-A2, cartographi sur le chromosome 5A et connu comme tant

    le locus majeur de tolrance au gel chez le bl. Le squenage de la rgion promotrice de

    TaCBF12a mis en vidence neuf polymorphismes simples nuclotides (SNPs) compltement

    associs entre eux, gnrant deux haplotypes. Des lments cis-rgulateurs de rgulation en

    basses tenpratures taient visibles dans la rgion promotrice. Les SNPs ont engendr la

    prsence de deux lments cis-rgulateurs, probablement impliqus dans lacclimatation au

    froid, diffrenciant les deux haplotypes. Ces deux haplotypes ont ensuite t tests pour leur

    association avec la variation phnotypique. Aucune association na t trouve suggrant un

    effet mineur de TaCBF12sur la variation phnotypique de la tolrance au gel. Toutefois, une

    association fortement significative a t trouve entre le marqueur Xcfa2173 sur le

    chromosome 4D et la variation du paramtre de fluorescence Fv/Fmau dbut de lhiver. Les

    allles identifis pourraient tre utiles en slection pour la tolrance au gel pendant la phase

    dendurcissement du bl.

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    11/91

    VII

    List of abbreviations

    bp Base pair

    CBF C-repeat binding factor

    cM Centimorgan

    COR Cold-regulated

    DRE/CRT Drought-responsive element/C repeat

    DREB Drought-responsive element binding protein

    Fr-A2 Frost tolerance locus on chromosome 5A

    Fv/Fm Maximum quantum efficiency of Photosystem II primary photochemistry

    GEVES French group of varieties and seeds study and controlGLM General linear model

    ICE Inducer of CBF expression

    INRA French national institute of agronomical research

    LD Linkage disequilibrium

    MLM Mixed linear model

    PAM Pulse amplitude modulation fluorometer

    PCR Polymerase chain reactionPSII Photosystem II

    QTL Quantitative trait locus

    RAC Federal station of agronomical research of Changins

    Rpm Rotation per minute

    SNP Single nucleotide polymorphism

    SPAD Soil plant analyses development

    SSR Simple sequence repeats

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    12/91

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    13/91

    Chapter 1

    1

    1 General Introduction

    Wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) was one of the first domesticated food crops and has been the

    major staple in Europe, North Africa and central Asia for 8000 years. It is still one of the most

    important food crops. Wheat is cultivated on more than 240 million hectares, which is the

    largest area of any crop. The most suitable latitudes for wheat cultivation are between 30 and

    60 N and between 27 and 40 S (Nuttonson 1955). Wheat grows from 0 to 3,000 m a.s.l.

    The optimum growing temperature is 25 C with a minimum of 3 to 4 C and a maximum of

    30 to 32 C (Briggle 1980). Precipitations for wheat cultivation range between 250 and 1750

    mm (Leonard and Martin 1963). World trade in wheat is greater than for all the other crops

    combined. In 2005, worldwide production of wheat reached 625 million tons (FAOSTAT, seehttp://faostat.fao.org/). The world population is predicted to increase to 7.9 billion by 2025

    (United States Census Bureau, see http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/idb/worldpopinfo.html).

    Assuming that wheat consumption remains stable, 786 million tons of wheat will be required

    by 2025. The only way to meet this demand is to develop marginal lands for wheat

    production. Frost is a major factor that limits the expansion of wheat and it periodically

    accounts for significant reductions in plant productivity. Making use of the genetic diversity

    in genetic resources of wheat, improving frost tolerance is the most sustainable way ofsupporting food security. In the last decade, tremendous progress has been made in wheat

    genomic research, which has the potential to solve the major problems associated with the

    genetic basis of frost tolerance.

    1.1 Frost-induced damage and cellular response to low temperature

    Low temperature reduces the velocity of many enzymatic reactions and, in particular, inhibits

    certain enzymes in the dark reaction of photosynthesis. In contrast, photosynthetic electron

    transport is affected only slightly by temperature (Fracheboud and Leipner 2003). Under these

    conditions, chlorophyll still absorbs light energy but can not use this energy for

    photosynthesis. This excess of excitation has to be dissipated as heat, because pigments that

    remain in an excited state pose the risk of generating free radicals, which lead to oxidative

    stress (Hurry et al. 2000). This production of reactive oxygen species contributes to

    membrane damage (Mc Kersie and Bowley 1997). When temperature drops below 0 C, ice

    formation is initiated in the intercellular spaces; the extracellular fluid has a higher freezingpoint than the intracellular fluid due to its lower solute concentration. The formation of

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    14/91

    General Introduction

    2

    extracellular ice results in the movement of water from inside the cell to the intercellular

    spaces, which result in severe dehydration of the plant cell. The accumulation of ice in the

    intercellular spaces can cause physical disruption of the cell (Levitt 1980). Moreover, low

    temperature triggers protein denaturation, which could potentially harm the cell (Guy and Li

    1998), and induces lipid transformations (Steponkus et al. 1993; Uemura and Steponkus

    1997).

    The strategy of plants to avoid frost-induced injury seems to depend mainly on achieving: (i)

    membrane stability, (ii) inhibition of ice formation, (iii) prevention of dehydration and (iv)

    macromolecular stability. Membrane stability seems to be the result of the action of lipids and

    proteins. In particular, an asymmetry of membrane lipids contributes to stability (Sung et al.

    2003). Similarly, amphipathic -helical regions which form by late embryogenesis abundant

    (LEA) polypeptides stabilize membranes against damage caused by freezing (Thomashow

    1999). Furthermore, proteins encoded by cold-regulated (COR) genes seem to play a role in

    the stabilization of the chloroplast membrane (Crosatti et al. 1999). The inhibition of

    intracellular ice formation is achieved by antifreeze proteins (AFP) (Smallwood et al. 1999;

    Griffith et al. 2005; Tremblay et al. 2005). Dehydrins prevent dehydration (Fu et al. 2000).

    Moreover, sugars such as sucrose, glucose, fructose, raffinose and stachyose have a

    cryoprotectant effect (Castonguay et al. 1995), and proline, glycine, betaine and sorbitol act as

    osmoprotectants by increasing the osmotic pressure in the cytoplasm (Rudolph et al. 1986).

    Protection from protein denaturation is achieved by molecular chaperones (Wang et al. 2003).

    1.2 Cold acclimation and winter hardiness of wheat

    Many plant species have the potential to cold acclimate, acquiring an enhanced tolerance to

    negative temperature when exposed to a period of low but positive temperature. Cold

    acclimation is a reversible process, which is suppressed when temperatures exceed 0 C, for

    example during a spell of mild weather or in spring. In a second phase of hardening, exposure

    to negative but non injurious temperatures can confer to plants an increased tolerance to

    severe frost (Trunova 1965; Olien 1984; Castonguay et al. 1993; Castonguay et al. 1995;

    Livingston 1996). Winter wheat is less frost tolerant than rye but is more tolerant than barley

    (Hmm 1994). The acquired frost tolerance results from a combination of developmental,

    genotypic and environmental factors. According to Lecomte et al. (2003), the main factors

    that influence the acquired frost tolerance of wheat are growth stage, hardening conditions,

    the length of cold spells, sequences of frost and defrost, snow cover, maximum tolerance,

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    15/91

    Chapter 1

    3

    speed of hardening, and the ability to maintain tolerance. The growth stage is important

    because at early developmental stages (e.g. first leaf stage), wheat seedlings can withstand

    temperatures only as low as -12 C. To achieve a good frost tolerance, a growth period of

    three to five weeks at temperatures below 15 C is necessary; the plants can accumulate

    reserves. Negative temperatures favor a high and sustainable frost tolerance, but severe frost

    near the tolerance threshold of the variety causes a loss of tolerance. Furthermore a succession

    of frost and warm periods leads to a progressive decrease in frost tolerance. Snow cover has

    an insulating and, therefore a protective effect even when the snow layer is less than 5 cm.

    In wheat, the maximum frost tolerance is around -12 C for sensitive varieties and about

    -32 C for the most tolerant varieties. However, as mentioned above, the maximum resistance

    can be expressed only when the plant has reached a sufficient developmental stage and when

    the conditions for hardening have been met. The time required to reach the maximum

    tolerance is between three and five weeks, depending on the variety. This difference in

    acclimation speed can play a role during early cold spells, as fast acclimating varieties are

    better able to tolerate these cold spells. Furthermore, the ability of a variety to maintain cold

    hardiness contributes to its general winter hardiness when late cold spells occur after a warm

    period at the end of winter.

    1.3 Determination of frost tolerance

    There are a number of approaches to studying the frost tolerance of plants. Under field

    conditions, winter survival is usually determined or frost damage is visually assessed and

    quantified as the percentage of yellow leaf area after strong frost events. In the laboratory,

    frost-induced leaf damage is often determined by measuring electrolyte leakage. The

    measurement of electrical conductivity permits the assessment of the temperature at which 50

    % of the electrolytes had leaked from a leaf or a plantlet (LT50) and, therefore, expresses the

    degree of frost hardiness. A similar method is the measurement of the triphenyl tetrazolium

    chloride-reduction (TTC-reduction) capacity, which provides the degree of frost hardiness of

    the sample expressed as the temperature at which the amount of formazan formed after TTC-

    reduction is 50 % of that formed in control leaves. For many years, the chlorophyll

    fluorescence has been routinely used for the non-invasive assessment of photosynthetic

    performance of plants.

    The analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence is a very powerful tool for accessing the plants

    tolerance to abiotic stress factors (Fracheboud and Leipner 2003). Many parameters of the

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    16/91

    General Introduction

    4

    chlorophyll fluorescence are strongly affected by temperature and can be used to determine

    frost tolerance. Exposure of plants to low temperature in the light results in an energy

    imbalance that can lead to photoinhibition (Osmond 1994). This decrease in the maximum

    quantum efficiency of PSII primary photochemistry (Fv/Fm), which can occur due to freezing

    stress, indicates a change in the PSII reaction center, from a functional to a down-regulated or

    non-functional reaction center (Powles 1984; Krause 1988). The measurement of Fv/Fmhas

    an advantage over the other fluorescence parameters under conditions at which frost stress

    must be evaluated at fluctuating temperature, Fv/Fmper seis temperature-independent since

    the efficiency of energy transfer at the PSII is a quantum tunneling effect. Beside Fv/Fm, the

    quantum yield of electron transport at photosystem II (PSII) has been reported to allow to

    differentiate Triticumspecies with different cold tolerance (Rekika et al. 1997).

    1.4 Genetic aspects of frost tolerance in wheat

    Hexaploid wheat presumably originated in Iran, southwest of the Caspian Sea, as a result of

    the hybridization between tetraploid wheat (ssp. Dicoccon or ssp. Parvicoccum, AABB

    genome) and the diploid Aegilops tauschii(DD genome) followed by chromosome doubling

    (Bonjean and Angus 2001). In wheat, at least ten of the 21 chromosome pairs seem to be

    involved in a complex inheritance of frost tolerance (Cahalan and Law 1979; Sutka et al.1986). The group 5 chromosomes and the chromosomes 2B and 4B were reported to be

    important in determining frost tolerance, and it has often been suggested that chromosome 4D

    is involved in frost tolerance. Furthermore, a quantitative trait locus (QTL) for frost tolerance

    was detected on chromosome 1D (Bga et al. 2007). The chromosome 5A carries two loci for

    frost tolerance Fr-A1 (formerly Fr-1) and Fr-A2. In Triticum monococcum, these loci are

    separated by a distance of 30 cM. (Sutka and Snape 1989; Vgjfalvi et al. 2003). Fr-A1, the

    gene for frost resistance is closely linked to gene Vrn-A1, which controls vernalization

    (Galiba et al. 1995; Sutka et al. 1999). Chromosome 5B carries two loci for frost tolerance

    orthologous toFr-A1andFr-A2namedFr-B1andFr-B2(Tth et al. 2003), and chromosome

    5D carries the orthologous loci for frost toleranceFr-D1(formerlyFr-2) andFr-D2(Snape et

    al. 1997). A cluster of CBFgenes was mapped on theFr-Am2locus of Triticum monococcum

    (Miller et al. 2006). The CBFgenes encode cold-responsive transcription factors of the AP2

    type. InArabidopsis, the CBF3was shown to play a key regulatory role in freezing tolerance

    (Liu et al. 1998). Overexpressing this gene inArabidopsisenhanced freezing tolerance (Jaglo-

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    17/91

    Chapter 1

    5

    Ottosen. et al. 1998; Kasuga et al. 1999). Therefore, the CBFgenes seem to be a potential

    target for dissecting genetic variation in frost tolerance.

    1.5 Use of genetic resources for wheat improvement

    The intraspecific reduction caused by the development of high-yielding cultivars enhances the

    risk of losing adaptation to abiotic stress such as frost, which periodically accounts for

    significant reductions in wheat productivity. The use of genetic resources to improve wheat is

    considered to be the most sustainable way of conserving valuable genetic resources for the

    future. Genetic resources are all the material that is available for improving a cultivated plant

    species (Becker 1993) and are divided into four gene pools. The primary gene pool consists of

    species (including the target species), which are easily crossed to the target species. Thesecondary gene pool is made up of related species; their crossing with the targeted species

    often results in a low percentage of viable seeds and partially sterile progenies. The tertiary

    gene pool is defined by species, which can be used only by applying techniques such as

    embryo rescue or protoplasm fusion. Today a fourth class exists: isolated genes, which cross

    all the boundaries of plants, animals or microorganisms.

    Worldwide, more than 1500 genebanks are registered in the WIEWS (World Information and

    Early Warning System on PGR) and SIS (Seed Information System) databases. They

    conserve more than five million accessions belonging to more than 18000 species. The

    WIEWS facilitates the exchange of information among member countries on their gathered

    information on plant genetic resources. In Europe, many genebanks exist in which Triticum

    aestivumaccessions are held under the following statuses like wild, weedy, traditional cultivar

    or landrace, breeders line or advanced cultivar. In Switzerland, three institutes hold 4386

    Triticum aestivumaccessions from various countries. Among these institutes, the Agroscope

    Changins-Wdenswil, a governmental institute, is engaged in plant genetic resources

    activities and holds an ex situ collection of plant genetic resources with 4331 Triticum

    aestivum accessions (2000 traditional cultivars/landraces, 1700 breeders lines and 631

    undefined accessions) (FAO see http://apps3.fao.org/wiews/). The cereal activities of the

    Agroscope Changins-Wdenswil are conservation, characterization, utilization and plant

    breeding.

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    18/91

    General Introduction

    6

    1.6 Contribution of genomic research and molecular markers to cropimprovement

    In the last few years, genomicshas emerged from the technical advances made in molecular

    biological techniques and bioinformatics. Genomics aims at examining all genes and their

    functions of an organism. It has the potential for using genetic resources for the adaptation of

    wheat adaptation to frost as genes which can be used to improve wheat are identified.

    Genomic regions for a trait of interest can be identified by quantitative trait loci (QTL)

    analysis using a segregating population from two inbred lines. However, long stretches of

    chromosomes, in linkage disequilibrium (LD), because of a low number of generations after

    maximum LD is reached in the F1, lead to large confidence intervals for QTLs. In comparison

    with QTL analyses, association studies have the potential to mine directly the allelic diversity

    of genetic resources and to identify alleles that are beneficial for the trait of interest. For an

    association study, a random population sample of unrelated individuals is required. Because

    population structure can lead to false associations, it must be controlled. Such spurious

    associations can arise from extensive interchromosomic LD caused by an admixture of

    populations with different allele frequencies. Consequently, significant trait-marker

    associations can be found with markers, even if they are not in the very close proximity of

    trait loci. Two strategies have been developed for association mapping (Oraguzie and Wilcox

    2007). One is based on candidate genes: the candidate gene is sequenced within germplasmsshowing phenotypic variation in order to detect polymorphism in the gene, which is

    potentially associated with the phenotype. The second strategy consists of genotyping the

    genome with evenly distributed markers. A significant association can be detected if the

    chosen markers are in LD with genes controlling the phenotypic variation (Haussmann et al.

    2004).

    In order to avoid spurious associations due to population structure, the genetic stratification of

    the sample population is analyzed by means of molecular markers. They are an efficient toolin diversity studies for identifying the degree of genetic similarity. Due to their high rate of

    polymorphism, co-dominant character, selective neutrality, distribution across the genome

    and cost and labor efficiency, microsatellites or simple sequence repeats (SSRs) are suitable

    markers for detecting allele frequency within the population and for assessing population

    structure. The SSRs are tandemly repeated motifs of one to six bases. Polymorphism is

    created by the loss or gain of repeats. Three mechanisms may be responsible for the

    occurrence of new alleles at SSR loci: replication slippage, unequal crossing-over and genetic

    recombination. Replication slippage seems to be responsible for affecting the repeat number

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    19/91

    Chapter 1

    7

    of short tandem arrays (Tachida and Lizuka 1992) whereas unequal crossing-over affects long

    tandem arrays (Harding et al. 1992).

    In association mapping, in particular candidate gene-based association mapping, single

    nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) are attractive markers because of their high frequency, low

    mutation rate and amenability to automation. SNPs are individual differences in nucleotides

    between two DNA sequences. SNPs are produced by mutations in part due to errors during

    DNA replication. The mutation frequency is not random between two bases; it depends on the

    nature of the base, the sequence in the vicinity and the methylation status of the DNA.

    1.7 Aim of the study

    To achieve a sustainable agriculture under changing climatic conditions, wheat varieties arerequired, which are characterized by a high degree of winter hardiness and a low demand of

    vernalization. Therefore, the long-term aim is to better understand the response of wheat to

    frost and its genetic background in order to develop methods to improve its winter hardiness.

    For this purpose, it is important to use the genetic resources of wheat and to study the genetic

    and molecular mechanisms of frost tolerance.

    The focus of this thesis is on three major areas in research of the use of genetic resources for

    improving wheat with regard to frost tolerance: (i) investigation of genetic and phenotypic

    diversity of the wheat genetic resources available at Agroscope Changins-Wdenswil, (ii)

    testing the chlorophyll fluorescence analysis for assessing winter hardiness and (iii) the

    determination of the genetic basis of frost tolerance in wheat by association mapping.

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    20/91

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    21/91

    Chapter 2

    9

    SSRs are multiallelic, chromosome specific and are evenly distributed along the chromosome

    (Rder et al. 1998a; Rder et al. 1998b). SSR markers were shown to be highly polymorphic

    in diploid species, in the tetraploid wild wheat Triticum dicoccoides, in the D-genome donor

    of wheat,Aegilops tauschii, and in hexaploid wheat (Plaschke et al. 1995; Donini et al. 1998;

    Hammer et al. 2000; Pestsova et al. 2000; Prasad et al. 2000; Stachel et al. 2000; Fahima et al.

    2002). Furthermore, SSRs have been successfully used in wheat for QTL identification

    (Parker et al. 1998), resistance gene tagging (Peng et al. 1999; Brner et al. 2000b), marker-

    assisted selection (Korzun et al. 1998; Huang et al. 2000) and for investigating the genetic

    stability of genebank accessions (Brner et al. 2000a). The use of SSRs has facilitated the

    identification of subtle population subdivisions by focusing on the distribution of ancestry

    proportions, which can provide additional information about admixture processes (Falush et

    al. 2003).

    There is a great potential for improving abiotic stress tolerance, e.g. winter hardiness, by

    integrating seed material from gene banks in the actual breeding material. However, the

    genetic resources stored in gene banks are often poorly analyzed in respect to their

    physiological potential as well as their genetic background. Therefore, the investigation of the

    genetic diversity in wheat is a prerequisite for identifying genetic resources with high stress

    tolerance. Thus, the objective of the present study was to assess the genetic diversity of a

    large number of hexaploid wheat germplasms. Furthermore, this study was the basis for

    further physiological and molecular biological analyses.

    2.3 Material and Methods

    2.3.1 Plant material

    Two hundred ninety-eight wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) accessions were provided by

    Agroscope Changins-Wdenswil (Switzerland). Furthermore, 22 accessions were supplied by

    INRA Dijon (France). The accessions originated from 40 countries (Fig. 2.1) and consisted of

    released and unreleased cultivars, breeding lines and local variety/landraces (Table Appendix

    1). The material consisted of 153 winter, 72 spring and 3 intermediate wheat types; the growth

    habit of the remaining 92 accessions was not catalogued in the European Wheat Database

    (EWDB) (see http://genbank.vurv.cz/ewdb/).

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    22/91

    Phylogenetic analysis of wheat

    10

    2

    25

    24

    11

    3

    2

    3

    90

    3

    1

    261

    3

    17

    54

    25

    2

    2

    24

    1

    1

    14

    4

    11

    13

    115+1

    3

    6

    4

    33

    4

    9

    14

    7

    3

    4

    3

    14

    15

    6

    6

    1

    4

    2

    25

    24

    11

    3

    2

    3

    90

    3

    1

    261

    3

    17

    54

    25

    2

    2

    24

    1

    1

    14

    4

    11

    13

    115+1

    3

    6

    4

    33

    4

    9

    14

    7

    3

    4

    3

    14

    15

    6

    6

    1

    414

    4

    11

    13

    115+1

    3

    6

    4

    33

    4

    9

    14

    7

    3

    4

    3

    14

    15

    6

    6

    1

    4

    Figure 2.1: Origin of investigated wheat accessions. Number of accessions from eachcountry, and for four European regions is given above the country. Dark blue, North America;dark red, South America; light blue, northern Europe; dark-green, western Europe; red,southern Europe; green-yellow, Eastern Europe (countries of the Warsaw pact including theformer Yugoslavia but excluding the former Soviet republics Kazakhstan and Armenia); grey,Africa; yellow, Asia; turquoise, Oceania.

    2.3.2 Microsatellite analysisFor DNA extraction, wheat plants were grown in growth chambers at 18/16C (day/night) in

    0.75-l pots under a 12-h photoperiod (300 mol photons m-2s-1) and at a relative humidity of

    60/70 % for 30 days. The plants were watered and fertilized with Wuxal nutrient solution as

    required. From five-week-old plants, approximately 5 g of leaf tissue were collected and

    frozen in liquid N2. Samples were ground in liquid N2, added to 15 ml of CTAB and

    incubated at 65C for 90 minutes. An equal volume of dichloromethan:isoamylalcohol was

    added. The mixture was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 minutes (Megafuge 2.0, Heraeus,

    Osterode, Germany). The precipitate was added to 15 ml dichloromethan:isoamylalcohol,

    mixed well and centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 minutes. 75 l RNase A were added to the

    supernatant and the mixture was incubated for 30 to 45 minutes. The DNA was then

    precipitated with 10 ml of isopropanol. The pellet was hooked up by sterile pipettes and

    washed in wash solution 1 (76% ethanol, 200 mM sodium acetate) and wash solution 2 (76%

    ethanol, 10 mM ammonium acetate). Finally, the pellet was air-dried and the DNA was

    suspended in 1 ml TE-buffer (10 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA).

    Twenty-three microsatellite markers, detecting 32 loci, were selected for genotyping on the

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    23/91

    Chapter 2

    11

    basis of their chromosomal location. Markers that representatively cover the genome were

    identified (Table 2.1): 12 Xgwmmarkers, developed at IPK Gatersleben (Institute of Plant

    Genetics, Germany) (Rder et al. 1998b; Pestsova et al. 2000), 3 Xwmc markers from the

    Wheat Microsatellite Consortium (Gupta et al. 2002), 1 Xbarcmarker developed at USDA-

    ARS (Beltsville, USA), 5 Xcfa markers developed at INRA Clermont-Ferrand, France

    (Guyomarc'h et al. 2002b; Sourdille et al. 2003), 1Xcfdmarker (Guyomarc'h et al. 2002a) and

    1 Xgdmmarker (Pestsova et al. 2000; Paillard et al. 2003; Somers et al. 2004). The marker

    was also tested on nullisomic-tetrasomic stocks in order to determine the wheat chromosome

    which it was assigned. Two methods were used for polymerase chain reactions (PCR):

    protocol A and B (Table 2.1). The PCR of protocol A was performed in 10 l in a PTC-200

    (MJ Research) Peltier 9600 thermal cycler. The reaction buffer contained 16.25 ng template

    DNA, 0.125 mM of each deoxynucleotide, 10 nM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM

    MgCl2, 0.05 M labeled primer (IRD700 or 800), 0.2 M unlabelled primer and 0.5 U Taq

    DNA polymerase. Twenty-four to 35 cycles of 1 minute between 50 to 60C (depending on

    the primer combination, see Table 2.1) and 1 minute at 94C were performed, followed by

    two-minute elongation step at 72C. Fragment analysis was carried out on a LI-COR 4200

    DNA analyzer (Licor, Lincoln, NE, U.S.A.). Fifteen l of formamide tracking dye

    (Amersham) was added to each PCR sample and the PCR product was separated on 8%

    acrylamide gels. A pattern diversity analysis was performed by visual scoring. For protocol B,

    the reaction mixture (10 l) contained 16.25 ng of template DNA, 2.5 mM dNTP, 1 M M13-

    tailed forward primer, 10 M reverse primer, 100 mM Tris-HCl, 500 nM KCl, 15 mM MgCl2,

    0.75 U Taq polymerase (Sigma) and 10 M one of three fluorophores (6FAM, NED or VIC).

    The PCR conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation step of 4 minutes at 94C,

    followed by 35 cycles of 1 minute at 94C, 1 minute at Tm temperature (see Table 2.1), 2

    minutes at 72C followed by an extension step of 10 minutes at 72C and a final step of 30

    minutes at 60C. Amplified products were detected on a DNA sequencer (ABI PRISM 3730

    Genetic Analyzer, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, U.S.A.). Samples were prepared by

    adding 1 l of PCR product to 11.95 l of HiD formamide and 0.15 l of CIDR size standard.

    Pattern diversity analysis was performed using GeneMapper software v4.0 (Applied

    Biosystems, Foster City, U.S.A.). When markers produced more than one band, the bands

    with clearly separated size ranges were scored independently as a different locus.

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    24/91

    Phylogenetic analysis of wheat

    12

    Table 2.1: Name, loci, repeat motif, allele number and gene diversity of the 23 testedmicrosatellite markers. The annealing temperature (Tm) and the number of PCR cycles as wellas the protocol are given.

    Name Locus Repeat motifa Allele

    number

    Gene

    diversity

    Tm Cycles Protocol

    Xbarc133 3B (CT)24 9 0.502 55 29 AXcfa2141 a 5A (GA)18 14 0.885Xcfa2141 b 5D 3 0.196

    } 55 30 A

    Xcfa2153 1A (CT)27 20 0.920 55 35 BXcfa2163 5A (TC)16 11 0.439 55 35 BXcfa2173 4D (CA)28 16 0.841 55 24 AXcfa2174 a 7A (CT)15(GT)14 15 0.792Xcfa2174 b 7B 6 0.515

    } 60 35 B

    Xcfd223 3D (TG)18 10 0.733 50 35 BXgdm132 6D (CT)24 15 0.854 60 35 BXgwm190 5D (CT)22 4 0.706 60 35 BXgwm234 a 5A (CT)16(CA)20 3 0.117Xgwm234 b 5B 14 0.866

    } 55 28 A

    Xgwm311 a 2D (GA)29 13 0.861Xgwm311 b 6B 14 0.274

    } 60 35 B

    Xgwm335 5B (GA)14(GCGT)3 19 0.865 55 35 BXgwm357 1A (GA)18 12 0.764 55 34 AXgwm37 7D (AG)8GG(AG)21 7 0.509 60 35 BXgwm526 a 2A (CT)16 7 0.624

    Xgwm526 b 2B 4 0.148

    } 55 35 B

    Xgwm538 4B (GT)6T(GT)10 8 0.472 60 29 AXgwm570 6A (CT)14(GT)18 13 0.865 60 35 BXgwm624 4D (GT)26 11 0.816 50 35 BXgwm642 1D (GT)14 8 0.602 60 35 BXgwm779 3A (CA)31(GA)33 25 0.865 60 35 BXwmc150 a 5A (GT)21 5 0.640Xwmc150 b 5D 4 0.506Xwmc150 c 6A 10 0.794Xwmc150 d 7D 6 0.609

    } 50 33 A

    Xwmc216 a 1B (GT)22 3 0.373

    Xwmc216 b 1D 7 0.342} 60 30 A

    Xwmc232 4A (CA)11 8 0.454 55 30 A

    aRepeat motifs are based on the sequence of the variety Chinese Spring

    2.3.3 Genetic diversity assessment

    The gene diversity, which corresponds to the polymorphic information content (PIC)

    (Anderson et al. 1993), was computed according to Nei (1973) as:

    Gene diversity =

    =

    k

    1j

    2jp1 , for a single locus and 1-

    = =

    m

    1i

    k

    1j

    2ijp

    m

    1for several loci,

    wherepijis the frequency of the jthof k alleles for the ithof m loci.

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    25/91

    Chapter 2

    13

    The genetic diversity of the wheat accessions was analyzed by clustering the accessions by

    applying a parametric genetic mixture analysis implemented in the softwarestructureversion

    2.2 (Pritchard et al. 2000). A number of genetic clusters (K) ranging from 1 to 20 were tested

    using the linkage model in conjunction with the correlated allele frequency model (Falush et

    al. 2003). The distances of all markers were obtained from the Wheat Composite 2004

    (GrainGenes 2.0) with the exception ofXcfa2141at 5D andXwmc150at 6A whose distances

    originate from the Wheat Consensus SSR 2004 (Somers et al. 2004). For each K, 20

    independent runs were implemented. For each run, 10 000 burn-in periods followed by 10 000

    Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) were found to be sufficient. The number of genetic

    clusters (K) was estimated using the graphical method of Evanno et al. (2005) with minor

    modifications.

    2.4 Results

    2.4.1 Microsatellite polymorphism

    A total of 330 alleles were detected with an average allele number of 10.28 per locus and a

    gene diversity of 0.617. The number of alleles ranges from 3 to 25 with the lowest gene

    diversity, which is also called polymorphic information content (PIC), for Xgwm234a at

    chromosome 5A and the highest for Xcfa2153 at 1A (Table 2.1). The highest number of

    alleles per locus was detected in the A genome with 11.92, compared to 9.63 and 9.08 for

    Table 2.2:Comparative analysis of genetic diversity among homologues groups and genomesby the average allele number per locus and the gene diversity.

    Group Average allele number Gene diversity

    All 10.28 0.617

    Genome

    A 11.92 0.680B 9.63 0.502D 9.08 0.631

    Homologues group

    1 10.00 0.6002 7.40 0.5443 14.67 0.7004 10.75 0.6465 9.22 0.580

    6 13.00 0.6977 8.25 0.606

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    26/91

    Phylogenetic analysis of wheat

    14

    genomes B and D, respectively (Table 2.2). The corresponding gene diversity ranged from

    0.502 for the B genome to 0.680 for the A genome. The highest allele number per locus

    among the seven homologous groups was observed in chromosomal group 3 and the lowest in

    group 2 which was also reflected by the gene diversity for these two groups which was 0.700

    and 0.544, respectively (Table 2.2).

    2.4.2 Estimation of the number of genetic clusters and assignment of individuals topopulations

    The number of genetic clusters (K) was estimated from the rate of change in the log

    probability of data between successive K values (K) obtained from 20 independent runs

    under the linkage model (Fig. 2.2). The mean likelihood L(K) over 20 runs decreased slightly

    until K = 8 but increased strongly at higher K; at K > 12 the increase in L(K) became

    K

    2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

    L

    (K)

    -14000

    -13500

    -13000

    -12500

    -12000

    -11500

    -11000

    K

    2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

    L

    '(K)

    -300

    -200

    -100

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    K

    2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

    |L

    ''(K)|

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    K

    2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

    K

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    A

    C D

    B

    Figure 2.2:Determination of the number of genetic clusters (K) using the graphical methodof Evanno et al. (2005). (A) Mean L(K) SD over 20 runs for each K value. (B) Rate ofchange in the mean likelihood distribution calculated as L'(K) = L(K) - L(K-1). (C) Absolutevalues of the second order rate of change in the mean likelihood distribution calculated as|L''(K)| = |L'(K+1) - L'(K)|. (D) Kcalculated as K= |L''(K)|/SD[L(K)].

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    27/91

    Chapter 2

    15

    considerably less (Fig. 2.2 A). Plotting |L''(K)|, which reflects the second order rate of change

    in L(K) with respect toK, againstKresulted in a peak at aroundK= 13 (Fig. 2.2 C). Dividing

    |L''(K)| by the standard deviation of L(K) resulted in Kwith a peak value forK= 12 (Fig. 2.2

    D). Consequently, the number of genetic clusters (K) of the investigated plant material was

    assumed to beK= 12.

    The individual analyses of the 20 independent runs under the assumption ofK= 12 revealed

    that 7 out of the 12 populations were consistent among all the runs (D to G and I to K). The

    populations A and B were joined to one population in 7 runs. For the assignment of the

    individuals to one of the 12 populations, the maxp (the maximum proportional membership to

    one of the 12 populations of each individual) of the Qmatrices was taken from the run which

    showed the highest mean maxp over all individuals. The comparative analysis of the mean of

    maxp (corrected with maxp for maximum possible admixture) between successiveKsupported

    the estimation ofKby K; the average maxp increased untilK= 12 and remained constant at

    higherK.

    The value of , which reflects the relative contribution of population kto the genetic material

    in the sample, was = 0.377 0.026 (n = 20) at K= 12 suggesting that ancestry of many

    accessions originated from admixed populations. Individual proportions of membership in

    each group estimated are in agreement with the existence of a genetic stratification

    (population structure) in the sample. Furthermore, the estimated value of the -parameter is

    consistent with the distribution of the proportional membership of individual accessions (Fig.

    2.3).

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0 AB

    C

    D

    E

    F

    G

    H

    I

    J

    K

    L

    Fig. 2.3:Barplot of the proportional membership of individual accessions within each of thetwelve inferred populations (p ). Each accession is represented by a vertical bar composed of

    different colors representing the admixture to the twelve populations.

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    28/91

    Phylogenetic analysis of wheat

    16

    2.4.3 Within and between population diversity

    The twelve populations consisted of 21 (populations C and D) to 31 (populations B, E and J)

    individuals. The average allele number was ranged from about 4.1 and 5.3 which

    corresponded to a gene diversity of 0.463 to 0.600 and an FSTof 0.858 to 0.480 (Table 2.3).

    The least dispersed population was population D. Population J had a higher gene diversity

    than the whole set of 320 accessions (see for comparison Table 2.2); consequently, FSTwas

    very low for population J (Table 2.3).

    Table 2.3: Comparative analysis of genetic diversity among the populations, homologuegroups and genomes by means of the average allele number per locus and the gene diversityas well as the standard measure of genetic distance,FST, for each population.

    Population n Average allele number Gene diversity FST

    A 24 5.00 0.539 0.594B 31 4.97 0.529 0.467C 21 4.81 0.544 0.743D 21 4.06 0.463 0.858E 31 4.75 0.468 0.763F 28 4.53 0.488 0.651G 25 4.81 0.539 0.619H 25 4.69 0.502 0.708

    I 29 5.31 0.600 0.480J 31 7.44 0.662 0.012K 29 5.06 0.553 0.557L 25 4.94 0.559 0.610

    The distances among populations were analyzed by the allele frequency divergence among

    populations computed by the programstructureusing point estimates of P(Fig. 2.4). There

    was a high allele frequency divergence between population J and all the other populations.

    Furthermore, this analysis revealed that populations B, D, F and K were distinct from the

    other populations.

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    29/91

    Chapter 2

    17

    A

    H

    L

    EG

    C

    I

    J

    B

    F

    D

    K

    0.02

    F

    H

    D

    E

    A

    K

    L

    B

    CI

    G

    J

    A

    H

    L

    EG

    C

    I

    J

    B

    F

    D

    K

    0.02

    F

    H

    D

    E

    A

    K

    L

    B

    CI

    G

    J

    Fig. 2.4: Tree representing the distances among populations. The divergence in allelefrequency among the populations was computed using point estimates of P. The tree wasconstructed using MEGA 3.1.

    2.4.4 Causes of the observed population structure

    Among the 12 populations which captured the relevant subdivisions of the samples, origin

    seemed to play a role in the population structure observed. This is exemplified by the fact that

    42.3 % of the southern European accessions were classified in population G (Fig. 2.5 A). In

    this population a considerable number of the South American accessions was present. The

    largest part of the South American material was classified in population H and made up one

    third of the accessions of this population. The material from western Europe was classified in

    all the populations, with population B consisting of 58.1 % of western European accessions,

    for the most part from France. Population E also had a high percentage of western European

    material (32.3 %). However, the special characteristic of this population was the high

    percentage of northern European material; 48 % of the northern European accessions were

    classified in population E.

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    30/91

    Phylogenetic analysis of wheat

    18

    Num

    bero

    faccess

    ions

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    Population

    A B C D E F G H I J K L

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    A

    B

    C

    sub-meridionale

    albidum

    alborubrum

    barbarossa

    erythroleucon

    erythrosperum

    sub-erythrospermum

    ferrugineum

    sub-ferrugineumgraecum

    hostianum

    lutescens

    meridionale

    milturum

    turcicum

    velutinum

    nd

    N-America

    S-America

    N-Europe

    W-Europe

    E-Europe

    S-Europe

    Africa

    Asia

    Oceania

    Winter wheat

    Spring wheat

    Intermediate

    nd

    Fig. 2.5: Origin (A), type (B) and variety (C) of the 320 accessions comprised in the 12populations (A-L).

    It was also possible to identify type-related causes of the populations. Indeed, wheat of the

    winter type made up the predominant part of the populations D, E, F and, in particular B (Fig

    2.5 B). The spring wheat type was distributed among the remaining populations, in particular

    in K and L. A similar distribution was observed in respect to the varieties. The var. lutescens

    was found mainly in population E (Fig 2.5 C). In contrast, populations H and K consisted of

    52.0 and 44.8 % of var. erythrospermum, respectively. A considerable part of var.

    ferrugineumwas found in populations A, I and L.

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    31/91

    Chapter 2

    19

    A comparative analysis of microsatellite diversity among the nine geographical regions

    revealed that the accessions from South America exhibited more genetic diversity than those

    from the other regions. In contrast, the northern European material showed the lowest

    diversity (not considering Africa because of the low number of accessions from that

    continent) (Table 2.4).

    Table 2.4:Comparative analysis of genetic diversity among regions analyzed by the averageallele number and gene diversity.

    Region n Average allele number Gene diversity

    S-America 55 6.66 0.611Asia 13 4.38 0.603E-Europe 53 6.91 0.593

    N-America 27 5.38 0.590S-Europe 26 5.25 0.580W-Europe 90 7.72 0.571Oceania 27 5.19 0.568

    N-Europe 25 4.53 0.509Africa 3 1.84 0.324

    2.5 Discussion

    A set of 23 microsatellite (SSR) markers detecting 32 loci was used to characterize 320

    accessions of hexaploid wheat. The SSR markers displayed a high level of polymorphism.

    According to Huang et al. (2002), the number of alleles can be used to evaluate genetic

    diversity because of the significant correlation between gene diversity and the number of

    alleles. There was an average allele number of 10.3 per SSR locus in the investigated wheat

    material whereas RFLP analyses revealed 4.7 polymorphisms per probe/enzyme combination

    of the 81 European wheat cultivars (Siedler et al. 1994). Even fewer polymorphisms were

    found with RAPDs primers; they generated only 1.8 polymorphisms per primer among the 15

    investigated wheat cultivars (Joshi and Nguyen 1993). These findings support the finding of

    Huang et al. (2002) who showed that SSR markers in wheat are more informative than RFLPs

    and RAPDs. Similarly to the present results, Rder et al. (2002) found an average of 10.5

    alleles per microsatellite locus by genotyping 500 European wheat varieties with a set of 20

    SSR markers. Breseghello and Sorrells (2006) found an average number of 4.8 alleles per

    SSR locus in 149 elite soft wheat cultivars. A similar number of alleles was found for 60

    wheat cultivars from eastern Europe, genotyped at 42 SSR loci (Stachel et al. 2000). Other

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    32/91

    Phylogenetic analysis of wheat

    20

    estimates of meanallele number per locus in studies using SSR markerson diverse germplasm

    were: 5.6 alleles at 70 loci on 58 Triticum durumcultivars of diverse geographical origins,

    including oldcultivars (Maccaferri et al. 2003) and 18.1 alleles at 26 loci on 998 accessions of

    wheat from the genebank of IPK Gatersleben, Germany (Huang et al. 2002). The latter study

    suggests a much larger genetic diversity than that found in the studied 320 accessions.

    However, in respect to gene diversity (PIC), the difference between the gene diversity found

    in the present study (0.62) and that found in the 998 accessions of the genebank of IPK

    Gatersleben (0.77) (Huang et al. 2002) is smaller than the difference in the average number of

    alleles. The gene diversity of the B genome was found to be considerably lower than the gene

    diversity of the genomes A and D. This is consistent with the fact that the B genome is quite

    different from A and D genomes whereas the A and D genomes are more similar (Bonjean

    and Angus 2001). Huang et al. (2002) compared the gene diversity between wheat accessions

    from northern and southern Europe and found lower gene diversity in varieties from northern

    Europe than in those from southern Europe. The present study led to a similar finding. The

    gene diversity of the northern European accession was 0.509, much lower than that of the

    accessions from southern Europe (0.580).

    In order to analyse the genetic stratification of the material, the genetic diversity of the 320

    wheat accessions was analyzed by clustering the accessions by means of a parametric genetic

    mixture analysis (Pritchard et al. 2000). The model-based clustering method of this analysis

    was chosen to use mutilocus genotype data, to infer populations and to assign individuals to

    these populations. It was assumed that SSRs frequencies correlated among populations as it is

    often more effective than the independent frequencies model at detecting subtle population

    structure (Falush et al. 2003). This method is also known to be more suitable for explanatory

    data analysis than distance-based methods, because it is easier to assess the validity of explicit

    modeling assumptions than to compare the relative merits of more abstract quantities such as

    distance measures and graphical representations (Pritchard et al. 2000). The analysis of the

    genetic stratification of the 320 accessions suggested a large admixture history between close

    and distant relatives, gene flow between cultivated species and mutations, which contributed

    to allele frequency modifications. The clustering method was successful because the gene

    diversity in the obtained groups was lower than in the whole population. Furthermore,

    clustering reflected the geographic origin of the material. Nevertheless, none of the clusters

    was made up of varieties of just one origin. This can be easily explained when exchanges of

    wheat material from one region to another is considered, which homogenized the wheat pooland results in similar allele frequencies. For example, a relatedness was found between wheat

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    33/91

    Chapter 2

    21

    accessions from South America and wheat from southern Europe. This relatedness can be

    historically explained by the fact that Spaniards brought wheat to Mexico in 1529 from where

    it was distributed to South America (Bonjean and Angus 2001).

    In summary, a study of the genetic diversity of 320 wheat accessions based on 32 SSR loci

    revealed a high genetic diversity among these wheat accessions. The linked model-based

    diversity analysis identified twelve subpopulations. This genetic diversity survey will help to

    broaden genetic variation in future wheat breeding.

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    34/91

    Analysis of winter hardiness

    22

    3 Analysis of winter hardiness of divergent wheatmaterial under field conditions using chlorophyllfluorescence analysis

    3.1 Abstract

    Tolerance to frost is an important goal in wheat cultivation to expand the growth area and to

    reduce pre-harvest losses. The goals of this work were to characterize wheat accessions with

    contrasting frost tolerance and to investigate the suitability of chlorophyll fluorescence and

    leaf greenness traits as selection criteria for winter hardiness. One hundred three wheat

    accessions were grown under field conditions without snow cover at the altitude station of

    INRA Dijon in Chaux des Prs (France). Maximum quantum efficiency of PSII primaryphotochemistry (Fv/Fm) and leaf greenness were determined throughout two winter seasons.

    Winter survival and shoot dry weight were assessed at the end of the winter. There was a

    large variation in winter hardiness within the investigated material. The determination of

    Fv/Fm in combination with leaf greenness permitted a differentiation of the accessions in

    respect to their winter hardiness already at the beginning of the winter. A distinct grouping of

    the investigated plants with regard to their ability to maintain frost tolerance was revealed by

    an analysis of the time course ofFv/Fm.

    3.2 Introduction

    Breeding programs for winter hardiness have been traditionally empirical. Classical selection

    for winter hardiness takes account of winter survival and frost damage or focuses on the yield

    per seas a final integrator of all the processes occurring during the life of the plant. However,

    meeting the challenges to increase winter hardiness will depend on a better understanding of

    the underlying physiological processes of winter hardiness. As well as the cold acclimationprocess sensu stricto, which permits an enhanced tolerance to subzero temperatures when

    plants are submitted to a period of low but positive temperatures, the second phase of

    hardening confers increased tolerance to negative temperatures by exposure to negative but

    non injurious temperatures (Livingston 1996). In wheat, temperatures as low as -12 C can be

    tolerated by sensitive varieties, while tolerant genotypes can withstand temperatures of

    -32 C. However, at early developmental stages, seedlings can hardly tolerate temperatures

    below -12 C. Good winter hardiness requires a sufficiently long growth period for the plantto accumulate reserves. Furthermore, it requires a mean daily temperature below 15 C and

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    35/91

    Chapter 3

    23

    between 3 and 5 weeks of low temperature (Lecomte et al. 2003). As well as the temperature

    during the phase of cold acclimation, light intensity also plays an important role in acquiring

    maximal frost tolerance (quist and Huner 2003). The freezing tolerance of winter wheat can

    be increased when plants develop under a higher light intensity (Pocock et al. 2001). Hereby,

    the excitation pressure seems to be of great importance, because a large number of genes,

    which are induced at low temperature, can also be induced by light (Ndong et al. 2001).

    Therefore, the response of the photosynthetic apparatus to low temperature seems to play a

    major role in cold acclimation.

    In order to determine the effects of environmental factors on the functioning of the

    photosynthetic apparatus, chlorophyll fluorescence analysis has a great potential (Fracheboud

    and Leipner 2003). Many authors evaluated frost tolerance by this method (Sundbom et al.

    1982; Barnes and Wilson 1984; Lindgren and Hllgren 1993; quist et al. 1993). In

    particular, the ratio of variable to maximal fluorescence (Fv/Fm), which reflects the maximum

    efficiency of PSII primary photochemistry, appeared to be a reliable parameter to quantify

    damage to the photosynthetic machinery (Bjrkman and Demmig 1987). After exposure of

    cereals to freezing stress,Fv/Fmper se as well as the frost-induced decrease inFv/Fm(Fv/Fm)

    show a high correlation with electrolyte leakage (Clement and Van Hasselt 1996; Pocock et

    al. 2001; Rizza et al. 2001). Moreover, long-term cold stress results in a decrease ofFv/Fmin

    particular when the cold stress was combined with high light intensity or/and when spring

    wheat was exposed to these conditions instead of winter wheat (Hurry et al. 1992). Similar

    results were obtained when the Fv/Fmof winter wheat was analyzed throughout the winter

    season (Groom and Baker 1992). Furthermore the study of Hurry et al. (1992) revealed that

    long-term cold stress under high light intensity leads to a reduction of the chlorophyll content.

    To improve winter hardiness, the selection efficiency could be increased if specific attributes

    related to frost tolerance could be identified and used as selection criteria for complementing

    traditional plant breeding. The objective of this study was to examine the suitability of

    chlorophyll fluorescence analysis in combination with the determination of leaf greenness as

    selection criterion for winter hardiness within a selection of germplasm grown under field

    conditions and to describe this material in terms of winter hardiness.

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    36/91

    Analysis of winter hardiness

    24

    3.3 Material and Methods

    3.3.1 Plant material and growth conditions

    One hundred three wheat Triticum aestivum L. accessions from 34 countries distributed

    worldwide were provided by Agroscope Changins-Wdenswil (Switzerland) (Table Appendix

    1). These genotypes were bred to perform well as crops in contrasting winter climates from

    continentally cold to subtropical cool; thus they present contrasting level of winter hardiness.

    The varieties consisted of 66 winter, 24 spring, 3 intermediate and 10 non-determined wheat

    varieties. The varieties were selected based on their degree of unrelatedness to obtain a

    diverse test set of germplasm. Plants were grown at INRA Dijon altitude station at Chaux des

    Prs, Dpartement Jura, France (46 30' N, 5 52' E, 875 m a.s.l.). The plants were grown

    without snow cover by employing a movable shelter which was controlled by a snow sensor;

    during snow fall the plot was covered by the shelter while for the rest of the time plants were

    exposed to ambient conditions. Experiments were carried out over two seasons (winter

    2004/05 and winter 2005/06). Sowing was implemented on the first week of October (5

    October 2004 and 6 October 2005). To ensure regular sowing, seeds were attached to a strip

    of paper with 2.5 cm between the seeds. Sowing depth was 2.5 cm. Thirty plants of a given

    accession were sown in each row. The rows were 75 cm long with a inter-row distance of 10

    cm. A replication was done in each year in the same shelter. Root damage due to freeze-thaw

    cycles of the soil were minimized by adding peat to the soil every two years. The pre-winter

    growth conditions were chosen to fulfill the requirements for hardening and so that all the

    accessions reached their maximum tolerance before the first frost.

    3.3.2 Phenotype assessment

    Each accession was graded (1 to 9) to express the degree of freezing tolerance based on a set

    of nine standard lines (Lecomte et al. 2003). The resistance of the standard lines is well

    known and corresponds to a grade of the official scale of the French group of varieties and

    seeds study and control (GEVES) (Table 3.1). The standard lines were described, after each

    cold spell (two to three weeks after the leaves had defrosted) by damaged foliar surface

    percentage and at the end of winter by their survival percentage (comparing the surviving

    plants with the number of emerged plants). The survival counting were performed on 7 and 8

    April 2005 and on 30 and 31 March 2006. The foliar damage of the tested plants was graded

    by comparing them with the closest standard lines after each cold spell. They were annotated

    using the closest standard line name, using if necessary "+" or "-" in the case a given variety ismore damaged than a standard line but less than the standard line of inferior tolerance coming

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    37/91

    Chapter 3

    25

    immediately after it in the range. The survival percentage was determined similarly to the

    standard lines. The final mark was attributed by comparison with the closest standard line first

    considering the survival percentage and the extent of foliar damage. To determine the shoot

    dry matter during re-growth, the shoots of ten plants of each accession in winter 2004/05 and

    five plants in winter 2005/06 were collected in March, dried at 60 C for one week and

    weighed. The photoinhibition was estimated by the maximum quantum efficiency of PSII

    primary photochemistry (Fv/Fm) measured with a pulse amplitude modulation fluorometer(PAM-2000, Walz, Effeltrich, Germany). Themeasuring light modulation frequency was set

    at 600 Hz to determine the minimum fluorescence (Fo) and at 20 kHz to measure the

    maximum fluorescence (Fm). To induce Fm, a saturating pulse of approximately 8000

    mol m-2s-1 PPFD for 0.8 s was applied. The Fv/Fm was calculated as (Fm-Fo)/Fm. The

    chlorophyll fluorescence measurements were done monthly throughout the winter season on

    the middle part of the second leaf with five measurements for each accession in each plot. The

    Fv/Fmmeasurements were carried out at nightfall in order to let the plants adapt to the darkfor at least 20 minutes. The greenness of the leaves was assessed using a SPAD-502

    chlorophyll meter (Minolta, Osaka, Japan). Measurements were done on the middle part of

    the second leaf. Five measurements were done for each accession and values were averaged

    by the SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter.

    Table 3.1: Range of frost sensitivity of standard lines. The sensitivity threshold correspondsto temperature at appearance of the first foliar necrosis, performed at the INRA altitudestation of Chaux des Prs at optimally frost hardened plants.

    Cultivar Sensitivity threshold Mark

    Rex -12 C 1Magali -14 C 2Champlein -15 C 3Cappelle -18 C 4Capitole -21 C 5Moisson -24 C 6Arminda -26 C 7Comtal -28 C 8Cheyenne -32 C 9

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    38/91

    Analysis of winter hardiness

    26

    3.4 Results

    3.4.1 Temperature conditions

    The first winter of experiment (2004/05) was characterized by a warm autumn (no frost in

    October) and no strong cold observed until the 22 December (Fig. 3.1). January was ratherwarm with a sharp decrease in temperatures for the last week of the month to -20 C for 2

    days and -24 C on 30 January. The beginning of February was cold and the end of the month

    2004/05

    Date

    01.1

    0.

    01.1

    1.

    01.1

    2.

    01.0

    1.

    01.0

    2.

    01.0

    3.

    01.0

    4.

    Temperature(C)

    -30

    -20

    -10

    0

    10

    20

    max. air temp.

    min. air temp.

    min. soil temp.

    2005/06

    Date

    01.1

    0.

    01.1

    1.

    01.1

    2.

    01.0

    1.

    01.0

    2.

    01.0

    3.

    01.0

    4.

    Temperature(C)

    -30

    -20

    -10

    0

    10

    20

    max. air temp.

    min. air temp.

    min. soil temp.

    -28.9 C

    -31.1 C

    -28.4 C

    -32.1 Cx x xx

    x x xx

    Figure 3.1: Daily maximum and minimum air temperature (at 2 m above ground) andminimum soil temperature (at soil surface) during the growth season in winter 2004/05 and2005/06. The minimum air and soil temperatures in each growth season are given. The dateson which physiological parameters were determined are marked by "x".

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    39/91

    Chapter 3

    27

    was very cold (-26 C on 25 and 26 February). The first week of March was very cold and the

    lowest temperatures of the season, -28.4 C and -32.1 C at soil level, were measured on 1

    March. There was an abrupt increase in temperature from 15 March. The second winter

    season (2005/06) was characterized by a warm autumn (no severe frosts until 15 November).

    December was very cold; -20 C at the beginning and -28.9 C at the end. The soil surface

    was -31.1 C on 30 December, the lowest temperature of the winter. Until the last 10 days of

    March, there were frequent temperature drops below -20 C and only a few days with no

    frost.

    3.4.2 Comparison of tested accessions with standard lines

    The 103 wheat accessions were classified according to winter hardiness in comparison to nine

    standard lines (Fig. 3.2). Accessions from Australia, South America and southern Europe

    were characterized by low winter hardiness grades compared to accessions from North

    America, eastern Europe and northern Europe. There was a highly significant linear

    correlation for winter hardiness grades between the two plots (r2= 0.978 in 2004/05 and r2=

    0.954 in 2005/06) and between both winter seasons (r2= 0.906) (see Fig. 3.3).

    Accession

    Rex

    Magali

    Champlein

    Cappelle

    Capitole

    Moisson

    Arminda

    Comatal

    Cheyenne

    Mark

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Africa

    Oceania

    Asia

    East Europe

    South Europe

    West Europe

    North Europe

    South America

    North America

    Figure 3.2: Classification of the 103 wheat accessions graded for winter hardiness, based onthe winter hardiness of nine standard lines. The accessions are colored according to thegeographic origin. Values are means SD of four replications (two plots in each of the twowinter seasons).

    3.4.3 Effect of experimental season on winter survival

    All 103 investigated wheat accessions behaved very similarly in relation to the nine standardlines in both winter; the grades for winter hardiness were closely related between the two

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    40/91

    Analysis of winter hardiness

    28

    experimental seasons (Fig. 3.3 A). Looking on the survival rate, however, a considerable

    difference was observed between the two experimental seasons. In 2004/05 a larger number

    of accessions survived the winter than in 2005/06 (Fig. 3.3 B). In particular, accessions which

    showed a moderate winter survival in 2004/05 had a very low survival rate in 2005/06. This

    effect was also reflected in the shoot dry weight after re-growth (Fig. 3.3 C).

    3.4.4 Time course of Fv/Fmand leaf greenness throughout the winter season

    TheFv/Fmof the wheat plants was 0.726 (2004/05) and 0.747 (2005/06) at the beginning of

    winter (Table 3.2). There was a considerable effect of year and leaf greenness. While in

    Mark

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    2005

    /06

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Survival (%)

    2004/05

    0 20 40 60 80 100

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    Shoot dry weight (g plant-1

    )

    0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    A B C

    r = 0.906

    r = 0.826

    r = 0.635

    Figure 3.3: Relationship of winter hardiness grades (A), winter survival (B) and shoot dryweight after re-growth (C) between the two experimental seasons (2004/05 and 2005/06) in

    the 95 investigated wheat accessions. Values are means of the two plots.

    Table 3.2: Mean, minimum and maximum of Fv/Fm and SPAD of the investigated wheataccessions in winter 2004/05 and winter 2005/06. Values are derived from means of tenmeasurements for each genotype.

    Fv/Fm SPADmean min max mean min max

    2004/05Nov 0.726 0.658 0.766 38.3 29.9 44.6Dec 0.723 0.586 0.775 37.9 26.6 48.2Jan 0.390 0.111 0.630 35.4 11.3 51.3Feb 0.214 0.000 0.683 25.5 4.0 54.7

    2005/06Nov 0.747 0.632 0.784 48.6 39.4 56.7Dec 0.523 0.116 0.697 45.7 29.0 54.3

    Jan 0.162 0.000 0.556 28.9 1.9 54.4Feb 0.011 0.000 0.391 1.0 0.0 36.0

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    41/91

    Chapter 3

    29

    November 2004/05 the SPAD value was on average 38.3, it was 48.6 in November 2005/06.

    When the temperature was lower than -15 C (see Table 3.3), bothFv/Fmand SPAD started to

    decrease. At the end of winter 2005/06, most of the wheat accessions exhibited strong

    necroses and, consequently,Fv/Fmand leaf greenness were close to zero.

    There was a positive correlation between leaf greenness (SPAD) and Fv/Fm from the time

    when starting to discriminate for these traits (Fig. 3.4). When minimum temperature was

    frequently below -10 C (see Table 3.3), TheFv/Fmof sensitive genotypes declined and leaves

    got slightly paler. The Fv/Fmof all wheat accessions declined further when the temperature

    dropped down to a minimum of -20 C. This decline was much more pronounced on wheat

    accessions which showed a poor rate of winter survival. The decrease in leaf greenness was

    seemingly retarded compared to the decline in Fv/Fm as it can be seen from the data of

    January 2005 and December 2005 (Fig. 3.4). At this time, a good discrimination between the

    frost-tolerant and frost-sensitive genotypes could be done based on the combined

    measurements of leaf greenness and Fv/Fm. The discrimination between accessions was even

    more pronounced as the winter progressed and strong frost events were more severe.

    Furthermore, there was a high linear correlation for leaf greenness between the two replicates

    at this time: r2 = 0.679 (February 2005) and r2 = 0.835 (January 2006). The correlation

    between both replicates was noticeably the same when considering SPAD as well as Fv/Fm

    (data not shown). However a variance analysis of Fv/Fm and SPAD showed a small but

    Table 3.3: Temperature conditions before and during determination ofFv/Fm.

    Date min. temp.before meas.

    average temp.during meas.

    2004/0509.11. -9.0 C 2.1 1.420.12. -10.2 C 3.8 1.121.12. -10.5 C -2.6 1.526.01. -17.3 C -3.2 1.127.01. ditto -3.0 1.224.02. -26.4 C 2.8 1.725.02. ditto 1.9 1.9

    2005/0619.11. -10.3 C -0.3 0.8

    10.12. -19.7 C -1.5 1.908.01. -28.9 C 2.1 2.004.02. -28.9 C -3.8 0.6

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    42/91

    Analysis of winter hardiness

    30

    significant difference between the replications in each year withpvalues of 0.0016 (2004/05)

    and 0.0467 (2005/06).

    The discrimination between the accessions was more marked in the second year of experiment

    (2005/06) than in the first year (2004/05) at a given month. The genotypes with a higher level

    of tolerance were affected by the cold sooner during the second year of experiment. The

    ANOVA test indicated that differences among genotypes were highly significant (p= 2.10-16).

    However, there was no genotype year interaction (p= 0.2245) indicating that genotypes

    responded to the environment in the same way in each winter season.

    The accessions could be assigned by hierarchical cluster analysis in six groups according to

    their response of Fv/Fm throughout the two experimental seasons (Fig. 3.5). Two of the six

    groups consisted of a few (F) or only one accession (C). Group A consisted of accessions

    which showed a low winter survival in both winters. Most of the members of this group were

    spring wheat accessions from South America (in particular Brazil) and from Australia. The

    standard line "Rex" was a member of this group as well. Genotypes with moderate winter

    Nov 04

    Fv

    /Fm

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    100 % Survival

    50 % Survival

    0 % Survival

    Dec 04 Jan 05 Feb 05

    Nov 05

    SPAD

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    Fv/F

    m

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    Dec 05

    SPAD

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    Jan 06

    SPAD

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    Feb 06

    SPAD

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60

    Figure 3.4: Relationship between leaf greenness (SPAD) and maximum quantum efficiencyof PSII primary photochemistry (Fv/Fm) in the 103 wheat accessions throughout the twowinter seasons. The accessions were color-coded according to their winter survival rate for

    the corresponding year. Values are means of 10 measurements (5 from each plot, with theexception of November 2004 with only one plot and 5 replications).

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    43/91

    Chapter 3

    31

    survival in 2004/05 and low winter survival in 2005/06 were based on the Fv/Fm analysis

    classified in group B. The decline inFv/Fmof the genotypes from this group was less strong

    than that of the group A accessions. Most of the accessions in group B were from Argentina

    and Chile but also from western Europe, in particular from France. Groups D and E consisted

    of genotypes with a high winter survival in both winters. Both groups contained accessions

    from western and eastern Europe and northern Europe, the latter especially in group E, which

    was also characterized by a very high percentage of North American accessions. These two

    groups were distinct in the decline of Fv/Fm in winter 2004/05; the Fv/Fm of group E

    genotypes was clearly higher in February 2005 than the Fv/Fm of group D (Fig. 3.5). The

    Fv

    /Fm

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    Fv

    /Fm

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    01.1

    1.

    01.1

    2.

    01.0

    1.

    01.0

    2.

    01.1

    1.

    01.1

    2.

    01.0

    1.

    01.0

    2.

    01.0

    3.

    Fv

    /Fm

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    Fv

    /Fm

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    01.1

    1.

    01.1

    2.

    01.0

    1.

    01.0

    2.

    Fv

    /Fm

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    01.1

    1.

    01.1

    2.

    01.0

    1.

    01.0

    2.

    Fv

    /Fm

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    2004/05 2004/052005/06 2005/06

    A

    DC

    B

    FE

    4.7 10.9

    0.2 0.8

    49.7 37.9

    18.1 25.5

    31.0

    5.0

    93.9 11.2 71.5 26.3

    99.5 1.3 86.0 8.9 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0

    Figure 3.5: Time course ofFv/Fmfor the 103 wheat accessions. The accessions were assigned

    by hierarchical cluster analysis into six groups (A to F) according to their Fv/Fm response.Values are means of 10 measurements (5 from each plot, with the exception of November2004 with onl one lot and 5 re lications . The avera e winter survival SD for each cluster

  • 8/13/2019 Diss Caroline

    44/91

    Analysis of winter hardiness

    32

    highest winter survival and the smallest decline in Fv/Fmthroughout the winters were found

    for the accessions in group F. The three accessions were the varieties Ridit (USA) and

    Cheyenne (USA) as well as the landrace Wagrein 1371 (Austria).

    3.5 Discussion

    The climatic conditions of both winter seasons showed some common characteristics. The

    warm autumn in 2004 and especially in 2005 allowed for fast growth and early tillering phase

    at the beginning of November instead of mid-November when tillering usually occurs at the

    experimental site in Chaux des Prs (personal communication Alex Giraud). Frost (about

    -10 C) during this period had no effect on the maximu