Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Instructions for use
Title 荷電粒子入射反応における医療用放射性核種169Ybの生成断面積測定
Author(s) 花田, 萌美
Citation 北海道大学. 博士(医理工学) 甲第14118号
Issue Date 2020-03-25
DOI 10.14943/doctoral.k14118
Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/78121
Type theses (doctoral)
File Information Moemi_Hanada.pdf
Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP
1
、
169Yb
(Cross section measurements of charged-particle induced reactions
to produce medical radionuclide 169Yb)
2020 3
(Moemi HANADA)
、
169Yb
(Cross section measurements of charged-particle induced reactions
to produce medical radionuclide 169Yb)
2020 3
(Moemi HANADA)
、 ...................................................................................................................1
1. ............................................................................................................................................................................2
1.1 n .................................................................................................................................................. 2
1.2 n .......................................................................................................................... 3
1.3 -169L169YbM ...................................................................................................................................... 4
1.4 169Yb ................................................................................................................................................................ 5
1.4.1 169Tm ................................................................................................................................................................ 6
1.4.2 169Tm ........................................................................................................................................................... 7
1.4.3 169Tm ............................................................................................................................................. 8
1.4.4 natEr ............................................................................................................................................. 10
1.5 ................................................................................................................................................................... 11
........................................................................................................................................................................ 12
2. ............................................................................................................................................................... 13
2.1 Lactivation methodM .................................................................................................................................. 13
2.2 Lstacked foil methodM ............................................................................................................................... 13
2.3 Lgamma-ray spectrometryM....................................................................................................... 14
2.4 ................................................................................................................................................................................. 15
2.5 ................................................................................................................................................................... 16
3. ............................................................................................................................................................... 17
3.1 169Tm .................................................................................................................. 18
3.1.1 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18
3.1.2 .................................................................................................................................................................................. 19
3.1.3 ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 20
3.1.4 ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 21
3.2 natEr ..................................................................................................................... 22
3.2.1 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22
3.2.2 .................................................................................................................................................................................. 24
3.2.3 ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 24
3.2.4 ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 25
4. ............................................................................................................................................................... 26
4.1 169Tm .................................................................................................................. 26
4.1.1 169Yb ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 28
4.1.2 169Yb ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 29
4.1.3 .............................................................................................................................................................................. 30
4.2 natEr ..................................................................................................................... 37
4.2.1 169Yb ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 39
4.2.2 169Yb ................................................................................................................................................................................... 40
4.2.3 .............................................................................................................................................................................. 41
5. ......................................................................................................................................................................... 48
6. 、 ................................................................................................................................................. 49
............................................................................................................................................................................. 50
................................................................................................................................................................... 51
1
、
t 、 H
1. M. Saito, M. Aikawa, H. Haba, Y. Komori, S. Takács Production cross sections of 169Yb and Tm isotopes in deuteron-induced reactions on 169Tm Applied Radiation and Isotopes 125, 23-26, 2017
2. M. Saito, M. Aikawa, M. Sakaguchi, N. Ukon, H. Haba, Y. Komori, S. Takács Production cross sections of ytterbium and thulium radioisotopes in alpha-induced nuclear reactions on natural erbium Applied Radiation and Isotopes 154, 108874, 2019
t H
a. ・ Sandor Takacs 169Tm 169Yb
2016 , 2016 9 7 ~9 I b. ・
169Yb natEr 50 MeV
2019 , 2019 3 20 ~22 I
c. ・ Sandor Takacs 169Yb
2019 , 2019 9 11 ~13 I I
2
1.
1.1 n
t n b YH t mQ
mt Y H aH
-131L131IM
8.02 mQ H Vm H a nV
H
-125L125IM
59.4 I mQ HV H
n H
-192L192IrM
73.8 I mQ HV H
-99mL99mTcM
6 mQ H L mt 140 keVM an LSingle photon emission computed
tomography, SPECTM H a t mQ 99MoLT1/2 = 66M n m 99mTc H m
8 T H
-18L18FM
110 mQ H n n 511 keV a n LPositron emission tomography, PETM H b
n H
t am n mH H
VH
3
t 100 T n (U.S. Department of Energy)H
1.2 n
ta Q H a n a
mQ Lcross sectionM Q H V g tt H a mmQ Q Q n
H a a n t m
Lthick target yield, TTYM H V mQ t (Otuka and Sándor Takács, 2015) a H
m a t a Q H Q H mt
a n m 99mTc mQ 99MoH V m
H n [ (Van Noorden, 2013) Y Y
Yt HV H T n
99Mo/99mTc t 15 n (Van Noorden, 2013)H
t T H VH
m t nH
nt anmQ H mt nt
n mQ Hn m H
t t n -169L169YbMa H
4
1.3 -169L169YbM
169Ybt 32.02 m 49.8 keVV 307.7 keV L 93 keVM amQ H mQnV 125I 192Ir a n mQ n T (Lymperopoulou et
al., 2006)H e 1 aHa n e ]n
n m H 1 169Ybn 125I 192Ir
169Yb 32.0 g 49.8 - 308.7 keV 93 keV 168Yb(n,g)169Yb
125I 59.4 g 35.5 keV (g), 27.5 keV 31.0 keV ( X )
28.5 keV 124Xe(n,g)125Xe 125I
192Ir 73.8 b g 130 - 1060 keV (b), 256 - 672 keV (g)
350 keV 191Ir(n,g)192Ir
177.21 keVLIg = 22.16%Mn 197.96 keVLIg = 35.8%M
nV 169Yb L169Yb-DTPAM m(DeLand et al., 1971)H
5
1.4 169Yb
1-1 169Yb aH
.((-,5 (--5 (-.5 (- 5 (-05 (. 5 (.(5 (.)5 (. 5
.(-+ (-, (-- (-. (-
()
(-0 (.
) 0 )
(.(
)(-
(.)
(-(
-0(-8
(-+8
(-,8
(--8
(-.8
(-8
(-08(
(.8
(.(8
-(-)2( 0
(-2
(-+2
(- (
(-,2
(--2,
(-.2
)) -0
(-2
)-0.
(-02
(.2
(+0( 0+ 0, 0- 0. 0 00 ( ( ( ( )
(%( (-0
t H
169Yb t 168YbH V 168Ybt 0.123%n Y 169Yb
t n H mt VmQ t n H
169Yb t 2 Q[ T H me a H
t LInternational Atomic Energy Agency; IAEAM a EXFOR(Otuka et al., 2014)
H 2 169Yb a [ ] [MeV]
169Tm(p,n)169Yb 4 4-50 169Tm(d,2n)169Yb 3 4-50 169Tm(a,tn)169Yb 1 43-66 169Tm(a,4n)169Lu 169Yb 5 37-65 natEr(a,x)169Yb 4 10-84 166Er(a,n)169Yb 2 11-17 167Er(a,2n)169Yb 0 - 168Er(a,3n)169Yb 0 - 170Er(a,5n)169Yb 0 -
e nn 、 kY LTENDL-2017M(Koning et al., 2019) 1.4.1 V 1.4.4 H
6
1.4.1 169Tm 4 (Birattari et al., 1973; Spahn et al., 2005; Sonnabend et al., 2011; Tárkányi et al., 2012)
a 1-2 Hn a nm
V m V a 、H V V mt 2 (Birattari et al., 1973; Spahn et al., 2005)
Q t 2 Q mQ HTENDL-2017(Koning et al., 2019)t 8 MeV mt n a
t Y 15 MeV tH ]n b t e
mQ n T H
1-2 169Tm 169Yb H n TENDL-
2017
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 10 20 30 40 50
169Tm(p,n)169Yb
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
Birattari 1973Spahn 2005Sonnabend 2011Tarkayni 2012TENDL-2017
7
1.4.2 169Tm L2016 (Saito et al., 2017)M
m t 3 (Tárkányi et al., 2007; Hermanne et al., 2009, 2016)mQ H t m LTm2O3M
n tt mQ n H V V n T
u n V H m mtmQ n T H
1-3t 3 n 、 TENDL-2017(Koning et al., 2019)n mQ H t n a
t n HTENDL-2017 tY H
1-3 169Tm 169Yb H n TENDL-
2017
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0 10 20 30 40 50
169Tm(d,2n)169Yb
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
Tarkanyi 2007Hermanne 2009Hermanne 2016TENDL2017Saito 2017
8
1.4.3 169Tm t 7 (Sau, Demeyer and Chéry, 1968; Leyden and Murthy, 1988; Singh, Agarwal and Rama
Rao, 1990; Mohan Rao, Mukherjee and Rao, 1992; Mohan Rao and Chintalapudi, 1994; Kiss et al., 2011; Rauscher et al., 2012)Q H V
mQ Lu 169Yb t 1mQ H 169Yb Yt
mQ mQ H 1-4 169Yb n 、 mQ TENDL-2017naH
1-4 169Tm 169Yb H n
TENDL-2017
mt 169Yb mQ 169LuLT1/2 = 34.06 M H 1-5169Lu n TENDL-2017n aH5 m
t n H n TENDL-2017t mQ H
0
50
100
150
200
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
169Tm(α,x)169Yb
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
Mohan Rao 1992TENDL-2017
9
1-5 169Tm 169Lu H n
TENDL-2017
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
169Tm(α,4n)169Lu
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
Sau 1968Singh 1990Mohan Rao 1992Mohan Rao 1994Patel 1999TENDL-2017
10
1.4.4 natEr t 4 (Homma et al., 1980; Archenti et al., 1985; Mohan Rao, Mukherjee and Rao, 1992;
Sonzogni et al., 1992; Király et al., 2008; Kiss et al., 2015) a 1-6 a mY a V m H n
m b a n YmQ n T H
1-6 natEr 169Yb H n
TENDL-2017
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
natEr(α,x)169Yb
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
Homma 1980Sonzogni 1992Archenti 1985Kiraly 2008TENDL2017
11
1.5
V 169Yb a t g mQ nV H 169Yb
a nm H 169Ybm a n m na H
mt 169Yb n mQ H mQ 169Tm
(Saito et al., 2017) T 169Tm natErH 169Yb Y
a n m H
12
m t mQ HL M AVF azimuthally varying field PET positron emission tomography SPECT single photon emission computed tomography
13
2.
m n3 [ H mt 3 n a
a H
2.1 Lactivation methodM
a n aa nm a mQ H
mt aH e t a
a n mQ H t H
! = #$%&'&$&()()*(1 − ./0(1)./0(3(1 − ./0(4)
Tγ Nt QNb εd εγ εt
λ tb tc tmn H
2.2 Lstacked foil methodM
n r n ma mQ H t m
Y n H t n na r a H
mt e t SRIM(Ziegler, Biersack and Ziegler, 2008) nm t LTime of flightM(Watanabe et al., 2014) H
r 2-1 a Y t Ha n n n
H a n H m a2-1 n a n
r 2 a nm n a nm H r n t nt Y
n a nmt n H V
14
V n Y Vn n H
2-1
2.3 Lgamma-ray spectrometryM
aa nm H et a (Chu, Ekström and
Firestone, 1999; International Atomic Energy Agency, 2009; National Nuclear Data Center, 2017)a H
t mQ LSEIKO EG&GMH ]n a
L 2-2MH m a nmn n H
15
2-2
2.4
t RI Q LHyper-pure Germanium, HPGeM H n r m
H 3 m n H 3
det. 1 GMX-25190-P ORTEC Tm+a 1 det. 2 GMX30P4-70 ORTEC Tm+a 2, Er+a det. 3 GEM30P4-70 ORTEC Tm+a 2, Er+a
e t 57,60Co, 88Y, 109Cd, 113Sn, 137Cs, 139Ce 241AmV LEckert
& Ziegler Isotope Products Inc.M H
16
2-3
2.5
LIAEAMmta Y V (Hermanne et al., 2018)
H 27Al, natTi, natCu n Va u HIAEAmt a
H n en a nm m n T H
mt n a nmH t IAEA (IAEA -
Nuclear Data Section)V mQ H
17
3.
t RI AVF Ht mQ m Y Q H
mQ 50 MeV mH
3-1 L Mn AVF L M
e 4 aH + (-08 E2
(-08 #a ()
) (. . ,(-6 9 (. - 1 )) (0 ) , .6 9 ( - 1 (
E2 #a ) ( 0 , 06 9 ) 1 (4 t mQ H t
m a n m H Va n m H
18
3.1 169Tm
169Tm t 2017 n Yn 2019 2 H
3.1.1 169Tm t 169Tm 1 27Al 2 1n 9 r 27 m H2019 mt 2017 n
T 27Al 1 28 n H tn 30 MeV a n H t 3-2L M
a 99.0% 169Tm L28.65 mg/cm2, Goodfellow Co., Ltd., UKMn 99.6%27Al L1.50 mg/cm2, Nilaco, Corp., JapanM H169Tm 27Al et n a nm H 169Tm t 2016
2 m 2017 2019 2H t ]n H 3-2
25 mm 169Tm n 8 mm 169Tm 27Al aHt 3-1m H
3-2 25 mm 169Tm L Mn 8 mm 169Tm 27Al L M
19
3.1.2 a
V IAEA n 3-3 aHt m
mQ H m t 30 MeV m27Al(a,x)22Na n H
3-3 169Tm 27Al(a,x)22Na
t 22NaLT1/2 = 2.6027 M 1274.53 keVLIγ = 99.944%M a nm H
1t 3 0.3% m HV V 10% a IAEA n H
u V tm Y n T mQ H
2t 2 m e IAEA n Yt V H e
t mQ H Det2; 6 0.05% H Det3; 1 0.4% H
t Y Ht m g Hn H
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
30 35 40 45 50 55
27Al(α,x)22Na
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
Recommended valueThis work #1 (det 1)This work #2 (det 2)This work #2 (det 3)
20
3.1.3 169Tm 50 MeV e
LQ M 5 aH a tNuDat 2.7(National Nuclear Data Center, 2017) Lund/LBNL Nuclear Data Search(Chu, Ekström and Firestone, 1999) Live Chart(International Atomic Energy Agency, 2009)V Q tQCalc(Pritychenko and Sonzogni, 2003)V H
, (-08 7
2g A 9 4g 7
6 9(.) 5 -. e ( . .+)- ( - a %( )
( (,) ) - +( -+ (-- ),0 .)+ )0 +0()(), (,), ),( 0 -,. -), (
(.( 5 )+ e ( (0 0+ ( . . a ) %(.)--.+ + (( +. 0. +. .
(. 5 ) () e ( +), 0 , a %),(0 ( )(+ .() ), ( )
(-05 + - e ( (0()( . ) - , a + % (
0- -)) ) + ,(++0.+ 00) )(
(-.8 0), e(100) ) . +( - aa) %(+0 (-. e
(- 8 0 ( e 0000b% (
aa %
(. 8 () - e 00 .b% (
+ ), ), a 3 %(+
(-. (. , e ( % % a E % . +(-0 ) ( e ( - () ++) - a E %)( ,
( 0. (.+. ( (-05 e( ,) (( ( 0(..)( ))(- ((0.0- ,
21
3.1.4 1m t 12.3-54.9% n H t L0.3-49.7%ML2%M L1%M L10%M L6%M
L< 6%M L3%M V 2 。 mH 2m t 8.7-44.6% n H t L0.1-43.8%ML2%M L1%M L5%M L6%M
L< 6%M L3%M V 2 。 mH
22
3.2 natEr
3.2.1 n LnatErM t 6 a mQ H
6 natEr 162Er 164Er 166Er 167Er 168Er 170Er
0.139% 1.601% 33.503% 22.869% 26.978% 14.910% VV t
H natEr mt Y
7 32 V H t 3-4L M a99% natEr L20.06 mg/cm2, Goodfellow Co., Ltd., UKMn 99.6% natTi L2.26 mg/cm2, Nilaco Corp., Japan) HnatEr natTi t
a nm H 3-4 50 mm natEr n 8 mmnatEr natTi aH t 3.1.1 n
H 7 natErn natTi
1 Er 17 Ti 2 Er 18 Ti 3 Er 19 Er 4 Er 20 Er 5 Ti 21 Er 6 Ti 22 Ti 7 Er 23 Ti 8 Er 24 Er 9 Er 25 Ti 10 Er 26 Ti 11 Ti 27 Er 12 Ti 28 Ti 13 Er 29 Ti 14 Er 30 Er 15 Er 31 Ti 16 Er 32 Ti
23
3-4 50 mm natEr L Mn 8 mm natEr natTi L M
24
3.2.2 169Tm a
IAEA n 3-5 aH mt 16-50 MeV m a n m natTi(a,x)51Cr n H
3-5 natEr natTi(α,x)51Cr
t 51Cr (T1/2 = 27.7025 ) 320.08 keV (Iγ = 9.910%) a nm H12 1.1% m
HnatEr m L-1%Ma n IAEA nH m n 2% mQ n n [ H
H
3.2.3 natEr 50 MeV eQ 8 aH a t NuDat 2.7(National Nuclear Data Center, 2017)
Lund/LBNL Nuclear Data Search(Chu, Ekström and Firestone, 1999) Live Chart(International Atomic Energy Agency, 2009)V Q tQCalc(Pritychenko and Sonzogni, 2003)V H
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 10 20 30 40 50
natTi(α,x)51Cr
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
RecommendedThis work
25
8 natEr 7
[%] Eg [keV] Ig [%] Q
[MeV] 169gYb 32.02 e (100) 63.12044(3) 43.62(23) 166Er(a,n)169Yb -10.2 177.21307(4) 22.28(11) 167Er(a,2n)169Yb -16.6 197.95675(4) 35.93 168Er(a,3n)169Yb -24.4 170Er(a,5n)169Yb -37.7 166Yb 56.7 e (100) 82.29(2) 15.552 162Er(a,g)166Yb -2.3 164Er(a,2n)166Yb -18.1 166Er(a,4n)166Yb -33.2 167Er(a,5n)166Yb -39.6 168Er(a,6n)166Yb -47.4 173Tm 8.24 b-(100) 398.9(6) 87.9(9) 170Er(a,p)173Tm -8.7 170Tm 128.6 b-(99.87) 84.25474(8) 2.48(6) 167Er(a,d)170Tm -8.4 e (0.13) 168Er(a,d)170Tm -13.9 170Er(a,tn)170Tm -20.9 168Tm 93.1 b-(0.01) 184.295(2) 18.15(16) 166Er(a,d)168Tm -14.3 e (99.99) 198.251(2) 54.49(16) 167Er(a,t)168Tm -14.5 447.515(3) 23.98(11) 168Er(a,tn)168Tm -22.3 815.989(5) 50.95(16) 170Er(a,t3n)168Tm -35.5 167Tm 9.25 e (100) 207.801(5) 42(8) 164Er(a,p)167Tm -8.3 166Er(a,dn)167Tm -21.2 167Er(a,tn)167Tm -21.3 168Er(a,t2n)167Tm -29.1 170Er(a,t4n)167Tm -42.4 166gTm 7.70 e (100) 184.405(25) 16.2(10) 164Er(a,d)166Tm -14.8 705.333(20) 11.1(7) 166Er(a,tn)166Tm -23.6 778.814(15) 19.1(12) 167Er(a,t2n)166Tm -27.6 785.904(15) 10.0(6) 168Er(a,t3n)166Tm -37.8 1273.540(16) 15.0(9) 2052.36(3) 17.4(11) 165Tm 30.06 e (100) 242.917(7) 35.5(17) 162Er(a,p)165Tm -8.3 297.369(6) 12.7(6) 164Er(a,t)165Tm -15.5 166Er(a,t2n)165Tm -30.7 167Er(a,t3n)165Tm -37.1 168Er(a,t4n)165Tm -44.9
3.2.4 t 8.5–29.0% mQ H t L0.2–27.7%M
L1%M L1%M L5%M L6%M L< 19%ML3%M 2 。 m H
26
4.
4.1 169Tm
169Yb mQ 169,170,171,172Lu 167,168,170Tm Ht m 2 H V a
mt n t V H mV r H t
b t n 、k H e 4-1V 4-8 t 9 aH
27
3 M 978 L 3105
2 0 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 .1
6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 66 6 6 6 6 66 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 66 6 6 6 6 6 6
6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 66 6 6 6 6 6 66 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 66 6 6 6 6 6 66 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 66 6 6 6 6 6 66 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 66 6 6 6 6 6 66 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 66 6 6 66 6 6 66 6 6 6
6 6 6 6
28
4.1.1 169Yb£¢
169Yb�T1/2 = 32.018 Ä�$�Éxf46Ð#ZK¡�±�isomeric state�2�� �èh�a2�v 1�$ 3Gr��v 2�$ 1Gr·���.�ZK¡�± ÔX�/#!�Ó �a o���/��#�*�qT#£¢µØ¤$d½�±�ZK¡�±#礶� ���/�(��ÖÊP�$�Z 169Lu�T1/2 = 34.06 �a��-#eÜ ¬��/�4.1.3.1¥����0�qT�� 4-3�2Þ�/����169Lu #eÜ2��O��qT�ÃᣢµØ¤�individual cross section (ind) �2Â��µØ¤#��!$ 177.21 keV�Ig = 22.28%�#8FB§2Þ���� 4-1 !����� 169Yb #µØ¤2 169Lu #eÜ c(0�¶�礵ؤ�cumulative cross section (cum)��eÜ2��O���ind�l!���
50.7 MeV(�#qT�$�?�:I·2����$�� ����V�#qT$�¦�tk,.+²��¶2�.�TENDL-2017$�vqT�Ì\��U�ÎR���/qT� ���}!��#ÊP!��/ 169Yb#£¢!$ 169Lu#eÜ ²����ß��/�� 1����
� 4-1 169Tm(a,x)169YbÊPµØ¤#qT�¦�tki& TENDL-2017#Ì\
0 200 400 600 800
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
30 35 40 45 50 55
169Tm(α,x)169Yb
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
Mohan Rao 1992TENDL-2017This work (ind) #1This work (ind) #2This work (cum) #1This work (cum) #2
29
4.1.2 169Yb£¢å 4.1.1¥�j*�µØ¤2w!����£¢å2�4-2!���ª�È!$ SRIM code2Þ��50.7 MeV(�£¢å#N���/ physical yield(Otuka and Sándor Takács, 2015)2�����
� 4-2 169Tm(a,x)169YbÊPµØ¤#�vqT!,/£¢å
0
500
1000
1500
2000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Physical Yield of 169YbPh
ysic
al y
ield
(kBq
/µAh
)
Particle energy (MeV)
169Tm+α(ind)169Tm+α(cum)
30
4.1.3 Ñ£¢Ò#£¢ 169Tm '#4E@3ã�Å�ÊP!����169Yb #!�WÂ-0�Ñ£¢Ò����
169,170,171,172Lui& 167,168,170Tm �/��0�0#£¢µØ¤2HQ!���
4.1.3.1 169Lu£¢ 4.1.1�gê��º.�169Lu�T1/2 = 34.06 �a�$ 169Yb£¢!�ß Ú^2³£¢Z���/��#��$�Ñ£¢Ò��/ 169Lu�#+##µØ¤!���gê2��
960.62 keV�Ig = 23.4%�#8FB§2Þ������ 169Lu#£¢µØ¤2� 4-3!��� V�#�vqT#?�:I·$�¦�tk�Y"N¸�/qT� �� �?�:I·!��/µØ¤ ¦�tk2200 mb�-500 mb¾À�W/qT� ���TENDL-2017$�©�#�vqT!°��?�:I· »�Õ!K / �V�#�vqT�?�:�#�²¶ Y"N¸�/qT� ���
� 4-3 169Tm(a,4n)169LuÊPµØ¤#qT�¦�tki& TENDL-2017#Ì\
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
30 35 40 45 50 55
169Tm(α,4n)169Lu
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
Sau 1968Singh 1990Mohan Rao 1992Mohan Rao 1994Patel 1999TENDL-2017This work #1This work #2
31
4.1.3.2 170Lu£¢ 170Lu�T1/2 = 2.012 Ä�#£¢µØ¤2 1280.25 keV�Ig = 8.18%�#8FB§�-����qT2� 4-4!���èh�a$�v 1�2l! 3ľÀ��/� V�#�vqT$¦�tk�?�:I·$N¸�/ �µØ¤ �,� 400 mb�- 500
mb K /qT� ���TENDL-2017 $�?�:I· �v¶!°�»�6=E9�!�.�µØ¤+¦�tk!°��$²���V�#�v!°��$���qT� ���
� 4-4 169Tm(a,3n)170LuÊPµØ¤#qT�¦�tki& TENDL-2017#Ì\
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
25 30 35 40 45 50 55
169Tm(α,3n)170Lu
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
Sau 1968Singh 1990Mohan Rao 1992Mohan Rao 1994Patel 1999TENDL-2017This work #1This work #2
32
4.1.3.3 171Lu£¢ 171gLu�T1/2 = 8.24 Ä�!$Éxf 79Ð#ZK¡�± 171mLu ¬��/��0$�èh�a
3Ä#a!_©!ÔX�/�~-0/�*�d½�±��/ 171gLu#ÔX8FB§ 739.78 keV�Ig = 47.8%�2«¼�/����d½�±�ZK¡�±�-#eÜ �p�0� 171Lu#礣¢µØ¤ Â-0/�qT2� 4-5!��� �W#6=E9�ËJ 28.0 MeV�-50.7 MeV#�*��#£¢ÊP!b��$?�:I·27>��/qT$Â-0 ����V�#�vqT$�¦�tk,.+²��¶2����TENDL-2017$¦�tk 2s(Singh, Agarwal and Rama Rao, 1990; Mohan Rao, Mukherjee and Rao, 1992)�n|$N¸�/ �£¢µØ¤$²��¶2����
� 4-5 169Tm(a,2n)171LuÊPµØ¤#qT�¦�tki& TENDL-2017#Ì\
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
169Tm(α,2n)171Lu
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
Sau 1968Singh 1990Mohan Rao 1992Mohan Rao 1994Patel 1999TENDL-2017This work #1This work #2
33
4.1.3.4 172Lu£¢ 172gLu�T1/2 = 6.7 Ä�$�Éxf 3.7Ó#ZK¡�±2������ -��v 1�2l!Û 3Ä#èh�a2·���.��#a!ZK¡�±$d½�±!_©!ÔX���~-0/��#�*�d½�±#8FB§ 1094.66 keV�Ig = 62.5%�2«¼�/����d½�±�ZK¡�±#礣¢µØ¤ ���0/��#qT2� 4-6!��� ¦�tk!,/��?�:$ 20 MeV¨z!¬��/�*�28.0 MeV�- 50.7 MeV2«¼���W#�v�$`«�� ����NÕ��6=E9�æM# #) Â-0��n|$¦�tk�Y"N¸�/ �®�²��¶� ���TENDL-2017$á�� .#6=E9�I·$�vqT�N¸�/ �?�:#6=E9�I·$�v¶,.+»� ���.�?�:I·,.+��6=E9�æM�$µØ¤$�vqT,.+»�¶� ���/�
� 4-6 169Tm(a,n)172LuÊPµØ¤#qT�¦�tki& TENDL-2017#Ì\
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 10 20 30 40 50
169Tm(α,n)172Lu
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
Sau 1968Singh 1990Mohan Rao 1992Mohan Rao 1994Patel 1999Kiss 2011Rauscher 2012TENDL-2017This work #1This work #2
34
4.1.3.5 167Tm£¢ 167Tm�T1/2 = 9.25 Ä�$��Z 167Yb�T1/2 = 17.5 Ó�#Éxf ´��*�èh�a#a!_©!ÔX���/�~/�� ��/��#�*��0-#Z�#�p 礵ؤ�������/�èh�a$�v 1�2l!Û 3Ä�����(��£¢µØ¤#��!�Þ�� 207.8 keV�Ig = 41%�#8FB§$�169Lu#ÔX�#8FB§ 207.727 keV�Ig = 0.390%��� ���/�*�4.1.3.1 ¥�����µØ¤�-eÜÓ2u¤+.��O��µØ¤#��2� ����#qT2� 4-7!��� V�#�vqT$¦�tk�Y"N¸�/qT� ������ -�50.7 MeV(�#qT��/�*�?�:I·2é1!�/��$�� ����TENDL-2017$©¯¿!�vqT�Ì\��U²ÎR���
� 4-7 169Tm(a,x)167TmÊPµØ¤#qT�¦�tki& TENDL-2017#Ì\
0
10
20
30
40
50
25 30 35 40 45 50 55
169Tm(α,x)167Tm
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
Singh 1990Mohan Rao 1992TENDL-2017This work #1This work #2
35
4.1.3.6 168Tm£¢ 168Tm�T1/2 = 93.1 Ä�$Éxf Ì\¿¹��2016Æ 2r!�����à�Å��v#�!£¢�0�Ó _©!$ÔX���-���âå2ÎR�� 1WÙ#�v�-��O���2WÙ#�v�$ 2016Æ�à�Å��v#�âÓ!S� 1WÙ#�âÓ+~ä�/��� .�{� ²�� ���(�*���2µÇ����#�*��#£¢ÊP!b��$�1WÙ#�vqT#)2���µØ¤#��!$�815.99 keV�Ig = 50.95%�#8FB§2�Þ���qT2� 4-8!���
50.7 MeV(�#qT�$?�:I·$y0 ����V�#�vqT$�K /qT2�����2s#¦�tk(Singh, Agarwal and Rama Rao, 1990; Mohan Rao, Mukherjee and Rao, 1992)#a!m§2Ï�qT� ���(��TENDL-2017$�vqT�?�:I·�µØ¤l!©�Ln|2����
� 4-8 169Tm(a,an)168TmÊPµØ¤#qT�¦�tki& TENDL-2017#Ì\
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
169Tm(α,αn)168Tm
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
Singh 1990Mohan Rao 1992TENDL-2017This work #1
36
4.1.3.7 170Tm£¢ 170Tm�T1/2 = 128.6 Ä�$�4.1.3.7 �# 168Tm �ÁÝ!�va]�Ì\���× ¹��
2016 Æ 2 r#�à�Å��v#�âÓ2~ä� �0% - ���#�*{� ²���2WÙ#4E@3ã�Å��v�$��2µÇ���84.25 keV�Ig = 2.48%�#8FB§2Þ������µØ¤2� 4-9!��� �#ÊP�$ EXFORC5ACD!¦�tk ¬����Ö�v �«¼� /�TENDL-
2017$V�#�vqT�Ì\��µØ¤2U�ÎR���/�� 1����
� 4-9 169Tm(a,3He)170TmÊPµØ¤#qT� TENDL-2017#Ì\
0
50
100
150
200
30 35 40 45 50 55
169Tm(α,3He)170Tm
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
TENDL-2017This work #1
37
4.2 natEr'#4E@3ã�Å�ÊP�v
169Yb#!�Ñ£¢Ò��/ 166Ybi& 165,166,167,168,170,173Tm#£¢µØ¤2[Â����0�0#�vqT2� 4-10�-� 4-17!����¶<�;$Í 10!���
38
517 6 E T M M 420
8 3 0 .2 .2 4 4 4 4 4 49 9 9 9 9 9 9 99 9 9 9 9 9 9 99 9 9 9 9 9 9 99 9 9 9 9 9 9 99 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 99 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 99 9 9 9 9 9 99 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
39
4.2.1 169YbĂĀ 169
Yb(�Ħñė 169gYb�T1/2 = 32.02 ĺ�&i�"�uZÿñė 169m
Yb�T1/2 = 46 ň��ĔÅ�3�� �%�1�uZÿñė( 11 ĺ'ų�Õ~'~&�Ħñė&zċ&ŕr�"�2�o�(�Ħñė$uZÿñė'ŲĄĂĀĚŜĄ6ĸ"3�đĥ&(��Ħñė&��3ŕrÕ';WNĊ 177.21 keV�Ig = 22.28%�6ÉŦ���o�'Ü¢�l6Ĉº���) TENDL-2017$�&ý 4-10&Ö��
Király1'F�B$ TENDL-2017(o�'�l$ĵť'ô3ō6��35 MeVŊ�&I�=Yĝ 6Ô ���4�4ĚŜĄ'Ę���Z%3�l$%���ĕ'Ĉº��'F�B(�.Ę��.Z%3�
ý 4-10 nat
Er(a,x)169
YbńfĚŜĄ'�l$Ĉº���) TENDL-2017'Ņv
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0 10 20 30 40 50
natEr(α,x)169Yb
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
Homma 1980Sonzogni 1992Archenti 1985Kiraly 2008TENDL2017This work
40
4.2.2 169Yb'ĂĀů 169
Yb'ĂĀů6 4.2.1Ć#�-�ĂĀĚŜĄ6£&Èè���čÑĿ( SRIM code6Ŧ"�physical yield6 48.9 MeV+#�È���ý 4-11&(Ĉº��#�3 Király1'F�B$'Ņv6Ö��o�'�-�ĂĀĚŜĄ(�ý 4.2.1#.¡"��0& Király 1'ĂĀĚŜĄ02.í��-�ý 4-11'0& Király 1'ĂĀů'¡Ą.202.í��l$%���
ý 4-11 nat
Er(a,x)169
YbńfĚŜĄ'Ü¢�l&03ĂĀů
0
200
400
600
800
1000
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Physical Yield of 169Yb
Inte
gral
yie
ld (k
Bq/µ
Ah)
Energy (MeV)
Kiraly 2008This work
41
4.2.3 ŎĂĀŐ'ĂĀ �'ńf&�"�169
Yb'ĕ&ŎĂĀŐ#�3 166Yb�) 165,166,167,168,170,173
Tm'ĂĀĚŜĄ6ĸ���'�l6Xg&Ö��
4.2.3.1 165
TmĂĀ
165Tm�T1/2 = 30.06 Õ~�'ĂĀĚŜĄ(�242.92 keV�Ig = 35.5%�';WNĊ6đĥ�3
�$#Èè���2.2Õ~'ų�Õ~'~&�ùu#�3 165Yb�T1/2 = 9.9 ő�(zċ&ŕr
�"�2�¿qÈè��ĂĀĚŜĄ(�165Yb$ 165
Tm'ŲĄě#�3�ý 4-12&�l6Ĉº���) TENDL-2017 $Ņv��.'6Ö��Király 1'F�B(o�'�l$^Ğ�3��Homma1'F�B(o�02.í�ě6$���TENDL-2017( 38 MeVXï'Ű]#Ü¢�l$Z%3ô3ō6,���
ý 4-12 nat
Er(a,x)165
TmńfĚŜĄ'�l$Ĉº���) TENDL-2017'Ņv
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 10 20 30 40 50
natEr(α,x)165Tm
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
Homma 1980Kiraly 2008TENDL2017This work
42
4.2.3.2 166
TmĂĀ
166Tm(Ń¥�7.70 Õ~'�Ħñė'ĕ&�Ń¥�340 OSň'uZÿñė�ĔÅ�3�
uZÿñė( 11 Õ~'ų�Õ~6ĝ�¿q'đĥ#(�zċ&ŕr�"3�+��ùu#�3 166
Yb�T1/2 = 56.7 Õ~�(�166Tm 02.Ń¥��ġ�-�đĥÕ&(ŕrĭ
Ġ'ùu&03e��ÀÅ��ñė#�3��'e�( 4.2.3.7Ć�ý 4-18�&"Èè�43ĚŜĄ 1¡Ą.2�Á�`���Ħñė 166g
Tm'ŕrÕ';WNĊ 778.81 keV�Ig =
19.1%� 1Èè��ĂĀĚŜĄ6ý 4-13&Ö��
�'ńf( EXFORR9KRS&Ĉº���ĔÅ�% ���-�TENDL-2017$'Ņv',6ý&Ö���TENDL-2017(o�'Ü¢F�B02.ě�í���ô3ō.[�l$%���
ý 4-13 nat
Er(a,x)166
TmńfĚŜĄ'�l$ TENDL-2017'Ņv
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
30 35 40 45 50
natEr(α,x)166Tm
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
TENDL2017This work
43
4.2.3.3 167
TmĂĀ
167Tm�T1/2 = 9.25 ĺ�'ĂĀĚŜĄ6 707.80 keV�Ig = 42%�';WNĊ&0�"Èè���
đĥ( 11ĺ'ų�Õ~6ĝ"ÜÐ���ùu#�3 167Yb �T1/2 = 17.5 ő�(�'ų�Õ
~'~&zċ&ŕr�"3�-�167Tm'ģąĂĀ�4�ő&i�" 167
Yb 1'�Ť�½��4�ŲĄĂĀĚŜĄ�Èè�4"3�¿qđĥ&ÉŦ��;WNĊ'�Į� 19%
'¬Á6Ô�"3�-�¬Á�Ę��%�"3�Ü¢�l$Ĉº���) TENDL-2017
$'Ņv6ý 4-14&Ö��
o�'Ü¢�l(Ĉº��2�'~&�Ċ6Ň��TENDL-2017(35 MeV+#(Ü¢F�B$Ů^Ğ6Ö����35MeVX»(Ü¢F�B02.í�ě6$���
ý 4-14 nat
Er(a,x)167
TmńfĚŜĄ'�l$Ĉº���) TENDL-2017'Ņv
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 10 20 30 40 50
natEr(α,x)167Tm
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
Homma 1980Kiraly 2008TENDL2017This work
44
4.2.3.4 168
TmĂĀ
168Tm�T1/2 = 93.1 ĺ�'ĂĀĚŜĄ(�247ĺ'ų�Õ~''��815.99 keV�Ig = 50.95%�
';WNĊ6đĥ�"Èè����l6Ĉº���) TENDL-2017$�&ý 4-15&Ö��
o�'Ü¢F�B( Sonzogni1$0�^Ğ��TENDL-2017(�±6æ�"3.''�ě(Ü¢ě6gq3�l$%���Homma1'Ü¢F�B(ô3ō�o�/Sonzogni1'Ü¢F�B�) TENDL-2017$ %2Z%3�l$%�"3�
ý 4-15 nat
Er(a,x)168
TmńfĚŜĄ'�l$Ĉº���) TENDL-2017'Ņv
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
natEr(α,x)168Tm
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
Homma 1980Sonzogni 1992TENDL2017This work
45
4.2.3.5 170
TmĂĀ
170Tm�T1/2 = 128.6 ĺ�'ĂĀĚŜĄ(�247 ĺ'ų�Õ~6ĝ�ª& 84.25 keV�Ig =
2.48%�ŕr;WNĊ6đĥ�3�$#ĸ14��ý 4-16&�'�l$ TENDL-2017'Ņv6Ö��
�'ńf'Ü¢F�B( ENFORF�BM�A&ĔÅ�%�TENDL-2017(Ü¢F�B02.Ĥě6$���
ý 4-16 nat
Er(a,x)170
TmńfĚŜĄ'�l$ TENDL-2017'Ņv
0
5
10
15
20
20 25 30 35 40 45 50
natEr(α,x)170Tm
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
TENDL2017This work
46
4.2.3.6 173
TmĂĀ
173Tm�T1/2 = 8.24 Õ~�(�2.2Õ~'ų�Õ~''� 398.9 keV�Ig = 87.9%�';WNĊ6
đĥ�3�$#ý 4-17&Ö�ĚŜĄ6ĸ��
Ĉº��(o�'Ü¢ě02.Ę���I�=Yĝ(^Ğ���TENDL-2017(Ü¢F�B02.í�ě6$���
ý 4-17 nat
Er(a,x)173
TmńfĚŜĄ'�l$Ĉº���) TENDL-2017'Ņv
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0 10 20 30 40 50
natEr(α,x)173Tm
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
Kiraly 2008TENDL2017This work
47
4.2.3.7 166
YbĂĀ
166Yb�T1/2 = 56.7 Õ~�(�82.29 keV�Ig = 15.552%�'ŕrÕ';WNĊ6đĥ�3�$#
ĚŜĄ6ĸ��ų�Õ~6 11 ĺĝ"đĥ6ÜÐ���o�'Ü¢�l$Ĉº���)TENDL-2017'Ņv6ý 4-18&Ö��
Ĉº�� 2 �$.�o�'Ü¢F�B02.í�ě6á3�$�5 ���^ŗ�TENDL-2017(Ü¢ě02.Ę�ě6Ö�"3�
ý 4-18 nat
Er(a,x)166
YbńfĚŜĄ'�l$Ĉº���) TENDL-2017'Ņv
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
natEr(α,x)166Yb
Cro
ss s
ectio
n (m
b)
Energy (MeV)
Sonzogni 1992Archenti 1985TENDL2017This work
48
5. ¹Æ
�4+#º%�"�� 169Tm *'çŧÍĻÝ�)8TJ7ŬÍĻÝ�nat
Er *'8TJ7ŬÍĻÝÜ¢�l6Ŧ"ĂĀů�thick target yield�6Èè��ńf6Ņv�3�
ĂĀů'^ã#�3 physical yield(Otuka and Takács, 2015)6Èè���l'Ņv6ý 5-1&Ö��
ý 5-1 physical yield'Ņv
natEr*'8TJ7ŬÍĻÝńf'�l(�20 MeV 1|/ &Đi��50 MeV#ş 800
kBq/µAh&%3�^ŗ�169Tm*'8TJ7ŬÍĻÝńf#(�40 MeV 1��&Đi��
50 MeV#( 1600 kBq/µAh&iję�3�+��169Tm*'çŧÍĻÝńf(��1&Ĥ:
HT<�#�3ş 10 MeV 1��&Đi��24 MeV#ş 5000 kBq/µAh$%3�ǹ$�"Tárkáyni1&03 169
Tm*'ŧÍĻÝńf(Tárkányi et al., 2012)'ě$Ņv�3$�13 MeV+#çŧÍ$ĵť'�±$%3.''�02¼:HT<�#(ĂĀů�î%�%3�$�5 ���
�'�l 1�169Tm*'çŧÍĻÝńf�Ĥ:HT<�#Ä.Ė�' 169
Yb6ĂĀ#�3�$�5 3�0�"�mīŬÍĻÝńf6Ŧ� 169
YbĂĀ'Ġ#(�169Tm*'ç
ŧÍĻÝ�Ä.°ũ�Ů$¹�143�
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Physical Yield of 169Yb
Phys
ical
yie
ld (k
Bq/µ
Ah)
Particle energy (MeV)
169Tm+d169Tm+α(ind)169Tm+α(cum)natEr+α169Tm+p(Tarkayni)
49
6. ďx�0)�ŷ
\ŭŦŖÝÿuã'®Ŕ'^ #�3 169Yb 'ĂĀ& "�mīŬÍĻÝńfÜ¢'
F�B�ʼnĒ�"3��'�-�169YbĂĀ&��3mīŬÍĻÝńfÜ¢6�IJĨ&Ü
Ð�"����4+#&�169Tm *'çŧÍĻÝ�8TJ7ŬÍĻÝ�) nat
Er *'8TJ7ŬÍĻÝÜ¢6Ũhw��ë AVF?9=UGUW&"ÜÐ���ŖÝhĄĎŁŘ�);WNĊő¯Ř&"ĂĀĚŜĄ6Èè���
µ&�41'Ü¢F�B6£&ĂĀů'^ã#�3 physical yield 6Èè��¿+#ÜÐ�"�� 3 'Ü¢$ 169
Tm*'ŧÍĻÝńfÜ¢'Ĉº��6Ņv���ĂĀů'Ņv 1�169
Tm*'çŧÍĻÝńf�02Ĥ:HT<�#Ä.Ė�' 169Yb6ĂĀ#�3�
$�5 ���ĂĀů'}ĩ 1¦Õĩ#(�mīŬÍĻÝńf&03 169Yb ĂĀ#(�
169Tm*'çŧÍĻÝ�Ä.°ũ�Ů$�ŷ!���
50
ÞØ
Ś¸'Úņ&��2���űĢ�Ė�'ŗ�*�'ð6ß2"÷�«ŵø�ï�+��àļÎĶ�_#�3½ĉā´�ä&(�åËnħ 1' 5Ľ~&Ĭ2��'�Č 1û-ŗċ"&�"þ�'«ÎĶ�)«ì§6���+���ŎÎĶ�_�gŢÊ�ä�œĪţ^é�ä&(ŚŷŒ6òÂ�"���+���+��bð²¯D�PS�C��íöš�Í���ű_6Ì-$�3Ũhw��ë'tť�) Takács Sándorïă��_�Ditrói
Ferencïă��_�Szűcs Zoltánïă��_Ì-$�3ATOMKI>T�L'tť&(�Ŵ��þđĥÜ¢'�Č 1«ÎĶ�)Ü¢&��3«ì§6���+���ŏį Ū\kĘw'a�ģľì�(�\ŭ�'ĜÙ�%Ò&þ�'\wĨ%ĜÙ�őŞ'¦ñı6��"���+���õĬ©A=�Tï�LU>RP'�_�)ĵ�Ă&�"(�ŒŨŝ5�ĕőŞ'ŗ�$'ū'�p6Ģ��ê-"×őę'â&03V�=@QEL'cd/×ő'��6ĕőŞ&3ü&±�"ćś�3�ç%�p$%2+���ݳĘw'·łå^ŶĹļì�&� 4+�"(�¤ÍuőŞ'�ČĜÙ6ú&ğ�3ì�&%�"���+���řsķĘw¤ÍuŨŷ��Û'tť&(�Ś��Û&wĂ�Ò^ü#���¾ 1wĂĵË'ū��ŷ'ð 1¨Ū�%0óŀ2���+�����"�Ś��Û¶Ā_'tť(Ò&ĵőŞ'wĂĵË'�ŷ�#�3�p6Ť�"���2+���Ī&�Ò&��&æÓ�3�p6Ť�"�4�Ō�ŸĴÜ�Ăy6Ï�"�4�ŋ�Š�6Ì-$�3jē&{Þø�ï�+��
51
`ŦŒ�
Archenti, A. et al. (1985) ‘(α,xn) Reactions on Natural Erbium’, Radiochimica Acta, 38, pp. 65–68. doi:
10.1524/ract.1985.38.2.65.
Birattari, C. et al. (1973) ‘Not to be reproduced by photoprint or microfilm without written permission from
the publisher PRE-EQUILIBRIUM PROCESSES IN (p,n) REACTIONS’, ~ Nuclear Physics, 201, pp. 579–592.
Available at: https://ac-els-cdn-com.afit.idm.oclc.org/0375947473903229/1-s2.0-0375947473903229-
main.pdf?_tid=17219995-a6a6-4044-b2de-
c1832396eda8&acdnat=1555419793_deb6a68d3761fe7aa7f4ed9133c989d4.
Chu, S. Y. F., Ekström, L. P. and Firestone, R. B. (1999) The Lund/LBNL Nuclear Data Search. Available at:
http://nucleardata.nuclear.lu.se/toi/.
DeLand, F. H. et al. (1971) ‘Cisternography with 169Yb-DTPA’, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 12, pp. 683–
689.
Hermanne, A. et al. (2009) ‘Excitation functions for production of medically relevant radioisotopes in
deuteron irradiations of Pr and Tm targets’, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section
B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 267(5), pp. 727–736. doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2008.12.017.
Hermanne, A. et al. (2016) ‘Extension of excitation functions up to 50 MeV for activation products in
deuteron irradiations of Pr and Tm targets’, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section
B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 383(September), pp. 81–88. doi:
10.1016/j.nimb.2016.06.010.
Hermanne, A. et al. (2018) ‘Reference Cross Sections for Charged-particle Monitor Reactions’, Nuclear Data
Sheets, 148, pp. 338–382. doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.009.
Homma, Y. et al. (1980) ‘Cyclotron production of 167
Tm from natural erbium and natural holmium’, Applied
Radiation and Isotopes, 31, pp. 505–508. doi: 10.1016/0020-708X(80)90314-2.
IAEA - Nuclear Data Section (no date) Nuclear Data services. Available at: https://www-nds.iaea.org/.
International Atomic Energy Agency (2009) LiveChart of Nuclides. Available at: https://www-
nds.iaea.org/livechart/.
Király, B. et al. (2008) ‘Excitation functions of alpha-induced nuclear reactions on natural erbium’, Nuclear
Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B, 266, pp. 549–554. doi:
10.1016/j.nimb.2007.12.067.
Kiss, G. G. et al. (2011) ‘Activation method combined with characteristic X-ray counting: A possibility to
measure (α,γ) cross sections on heavy p-nuclei’, Nuclear Physics A. Elsevier B.V., 867(1), pp. 52–65. doi:
10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2011.07.003.
Kiss, G. G. et al. (2015) ‘Measurement of (α,n) reaction cross sections of erbium isotopes for testing
astrophysical rate predictions’, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics. IOP Publishing, 42, p.
055103. doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/42/5/055103.
Koning, A. J. et al. (2019) ‘TENDL: Complete Nuclear Data Library for Innovative Nuclear Science and
Technology’, Nuclear Data Sheets. Elsevier Inc., 155, pp. 1–55. doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2019.01.002.
Leyden, D. E. and Murthy, R. S. S. (1988) ‘Diffuse reflectance Fourier transform IR spectroscopy’, Trends in
Analytical Chemistry. Elsevier B.V., 7(5), pp. 164–169. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2010.11.052.
52
Lymperopoulou, G. et al. (2006) ‘A dosimetric comparison of 169Yb and 192Ir for HDR brachytherapy of the
breast, accounting for the effect of finite patient dimensions and tissue inhomogeneities’, Medical Physics,
33(12), pp. 4583–4589. doi: 10.1118/1.2392408.
Mohan Rao, A. V. and Chintalapudi, S. N. (1994) ‘Pre-Equilibrium Decay Process in Alpha Particle Induced
Reactions on Thulium and Tantalum’, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 63(1), pp. 84–91. doi:
10.1143/JPSJ.63.84.
Mohan Rao, A. V., Mukherjee, S. and Rao, J. R. (1992) ‘Investigation of alpha particle induced reactions on
thulium’, Pramana, 38(3), pp. 279–290. doi: 10.1007/BF02875374.
National Nuclear Data Center (2017) Nuclear structure and decay data on-line library, Nudat 2.7. Available
at: http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat2/.
Van Noorden, R. (2013) ‘Radioisotopes: The medical testing crisis’, Nature, 504(7479), pp. 202–204. doi:
10.1038/504202a.
Otuka, N. et al. (2014) ‘Towards a More complete and accurate experimental nuclear reaction data library
(EXFOR): International collaboration between nuclear reaction data centres (NRDC)’, Nuclear Data Sheets,
120, pp. 272–276. doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2014.07.065.
Otuka, N. and Takács, Sándor (2015) ‘Definitions of radioisotope thick target yields’, Radiochimica Acta,
103(1), pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1515/ract-2013-2234.
Otuka, N. and Takács, Sandor (2015) ‘Definitions of radioisotope thick target yields’, Radiochimica Acta,
103(1), pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1515/ract-2013-2234.
Pritychenko, B. and Sonzogni, A. (2003) Q-value Calculator (QCalc). Available at:
http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/qcalc/.
Rauscher, T. et al. (2012) ‘Astrophysical analysis of the measurement of (α,γ) and (α,n) cross sections of
169Tm’, Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics, 86(1). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.86.015804.
Saito, M. et al. (2017) ‘Production cross sections of 169Yb and Tm isotopes in deuteron-induced reactions on
169Tm’, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 125, pp. 23–26. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.04.010.
Sau, J., Demeyer, A. and Chéry, R. (1968) ‘ÉTUDE EXPIÉRIMENTALE ET ANALYSE DES FONCTIONS
D’EXCITATION 165Ho(α, xn) ET 169Tm(α, xn)’, Nuclear Physics A, 121, pp. 131–144.
Singh, N. L., Agarwal, S. and Rama Rao, J. (1990) ‘Comparative Study of Pre-Equilibrium Models and
Mechanism of Alpha Particle Induced Reactions’, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 59(11), pp. 3916–
3924. doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.59.3916.
Sonnabend, K. et al. (2011) ‘Activation experiments for p-process nucleosynthesis’, Journal of Physics:
Conference Series, 312(SECTION 4). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/312/4/042007.
Sonzogni, A. A. et al. (1992) ‘Alpha-induced reactions on natural erbium’, Journal of Radioanalytical and
Nuclear Chemistry, Letters, 165, pp. 295–303. doi: 10.1007/BF02169776.
Spahn, I. et al. (2005) ‘Cross-section measurement of the 169Tm(p,n) reaction for the production of the
therapeutic radionuclide 169Yb and comparison with its reactor-based generation’, Applied Radiation and
Isotopes, 63(2), pp. 235–239. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2005.03.006.
Tárkányi, F. et al. (2007) ‘Activation cross sections of the 169Tm(d,2n) reaction for production of the
therapeutic radionuclide 169Yb’, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 65(6), pp. 663–668. doi:
10.1016/j.apradiso.2007.01.008.
53
Tárkányi, F. et al. (2012) ‘Activation cross-sections of proton induced nuclear reactions on thulium in the 20-
45MeV energy range’, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 70(1), pp. 309–314. doi:
10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.08.020.
U.S. Department of Energy (no date) NIDC: National Isotope Development Center. Available at:
https://www.isotopes.gov/.
Watanabe, T. et al. (2014) ‘Beam energy and longitudinal beam profile measurement system at the RIBF’, in
Proceedings of the 5th International Particle Accelerator Conference (IPAC 2014), pp. 3566–3568.
Ziegler, J. F., Biersack, J. P. and Ziegler, M. D. (2008) SRIM: the Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter.
Available at: http://www.srim.org.