11
EulServingCellUsersAdm

Eul Serving Cell Users Adm

  • Upload
    amir

  • View
    10

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Eul Serving Cell Users Adm

Citation preview

Page 1: Eul Serving Cell Users Adm

EulServingCellUsersAdm

Page 2: Eul Serving Cell Users Adm

FET N1 Project Status | 2014-05-22 | Page 2

Parameters Introduction›eulServingCellUsersAdm: Admission threshold for the number of E-DCH users having this cell as serving cell. Includes both 2 ms TTI and 10 ms TTI users.

›RN Admission Control must reject an EUL user, requesting the cell as serving cell if the total number of serving cell EUL users including the requested is above eulServingCellUsersAdm parameter.

›maxNumEulUsers: The maximum number of Serving EUL users allowed per cell.

› If license key 'Number of EUL Users per Cell' is enabled and Licensing Emergency Unlock is not activated, maxNumEulUsers cannot be set to a higher value than the license key allows. If the license key is disabled, maximum 4 EUL users are allowed per cell. If Licensing Emergency Unlock is activated, maximum 96 EUL users are allowed per cell.

Page 3: Eul Serving Cell Users Adm

FET N1 Project Status | 2014-05-22 | Page 3

Parameters Suggestion

›Current DTN network

›eulServingCellUsersAdm = 32;

›maxNumEulUsers = 32;

›Suggestion:

›For better network PS performance and reduce EUL Denied No.

›eulServingCellUsersAdm = 46;

›maxNumEulUsers = 48;

›For eulServingCellUsersAdm , we put less value compared with maxNumEulUsers to reserve the necessary resource for handover

Page 4: Eul Serving Cell Users Adm

FET N1 Project Status | 2014-05-22 | Page 4

Justification of changing parameter

› Majority of the EUL establishing failures are pegging on pmNoOfNonHoReqDeniedEul , that means not enough user adm for EUL.

› From the historical statistics , the hourly eul user number for the worst sites always reach maximum during busy hours.

Page 5: Eul Serving Cell Users Adm

FET N1 Project Status | 2014-05-22 | Page 5

Justification of changing parameter

Page 6: Eul Serving Cell Users Adm

FET N1 Project Status | 2014-05-22 | Page 6

Justification of changing parameter› From following table , we can get the relationship between

pmNoOfNonHoReqDeniedEul and EUL RAB failures .

Page 7: Eul Serving Cell Users Adm

FET N1 Project Status | 2014-05-22 | Page 7

Case --- CSSR HSUPA

Tuning Time

After the CR implementation , pmNoOfNonHoReqDeniedEul disappeared and the EUL CSSR has been improved obviously. Below is BKK0187 KPI trend:

CR#19853_Utrancell_Para_ eulServingCellUs

Page 8: Eul Serving Cell Users Adm

FET N1 Project Status | 2014-05-22 | Page 8

Case --- CSSR HSUPA

Tuning Time

Below is BKK0028 KPI trend:CR#19855_Utranc

ell_Para_ eulServingCellUs

Page 9: Eul Serving Cell Users Adm

FET N1 Project Status | 2014-05-22 | Page 9

Case --- CSSR HSUPATuning TimeBelow is BKK3214 KPI trend:

CR#19855_Utrancell_Para_ eulServingCellUs

Page 10: Eul Serving Cell Users Adm

FET N1 Project Status | 2014-05-22 | Page 10

Case --- CSSR HSUPA

Tuning Time

For the other performance , there was no degradation found , UL RSSI maintained as a acceptable level , the CDR maintained , CSSR maintained , EUL throughput maintained

Page 11: Eul Serving Cell Users Adm

FET N1 Project Status | 2014-05-22 | Page 11