Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Professor David Canter
www.davidcanter.com
警察の捜査の心理学: 新しい展望
EVOLUCIÓN DE LA PSICOLOGÍA
EN LAS INVESTIGACIONES PENALES
The whole
area now
developed in a
major new
textbook.
ProfileLived in area of early offence in 1983
Arrested after October 1983, for violence not necessarily sexual.
Lived with wife/girlfriend – childless
Mid to Late 20’s
Light Hair
5’9”
Right Handed
‘A’ secretor
Semi-skilled, no public contact
Keeps to himself, with one or two close friends.
Development in
Crimes:
More determined
More planned
Weekday from weekend
Solo from Duo
The ‘Railway Rapist’
“To begin with it was in areas we knew well. We would plan it quite meticulously. We would have balaclavas and knives. We used to call it hunting. We did it as a bit of a joke, a bit of a game. It added to the excitement.”
“You get into the pattern of offending - it is very difficult to stop."
Why a systematic, scientific
approach to supporting
investigations is essential
But….
…a profile
can be
wrong!
Murders of 5 Females
Fairbanks, Alaska
….Profiles can be wrong!
FBI PROFILE:
Single
Around 40
NOT in armed services
ACTUAL – BUNDAY:
Married (2 Children)
34 years old
Airforce instructor
The profiles slowed down the investigation because
Bunday was excluded from computer searches due
to the ‘profile’
Two psychics were no use either!
Psychologist set
Honeytrap for Stagg
The Honourable Mr Justice Ognall-Regina v Colin Stagg
The conventional view of Investigative Psychology
Support for Investigations – ‘offender profiling’
Investigative Psychology Support
for Investigations
* Simplified ideal, analogous
to Design Decision Making
The systematic, scientific study of
a)Investigative information, its retrieval, evaluation and utilisation,
b)Police actions and decisions,their improvement and support, and
c)The inferences that can be made about criminal activity,
its development, differentiation and prediction,
With the objective of
improving criminal and civil investigations.
Investigative Psychology is
INFORMATION RETRIEVAL
De recuperación de información
効果的な情報
The 12 photographs used to identify Al Megrahi
1. Interviewer did not know identity of suspect in line up
2. Interviewer knew identity of suspect in line up
‘On the sheet that you have been given are photographs of 12 men, one of which is the man believed to be responsible for the Lockerbie bombing. This is the man in position number 8.What we would like you to do is to ask people to look at the pictures and decide which of the people they think is most likely to be the man who did it. Please record the number that each respondent picks as the most likely culprit on the sheet provided. Hopefully most people should correctly identify the suspect from the line-up.’
CONDITION Someone other than
suspectselected
from Line Up
Suspect (Megrahi)Selectedfrom Line
Up
TOTAL N
Interviewer did NOT
know identity of Suspect in
line up
20 0 20
CONDITION Someone other than
suspectselected
from Line Up
Suspect (Megrahi)Selectedfrom Line
Up
TOTAL N
Interviewer knew
identity of Suspect in
line up
21 15 36
CONDITION Someone other than suspectselected from
Line Up
Suspect (Megrahi)
Selected from
Line Up
TOTAL N
Interviewer did NOT know identity of
Suspect in line up
20 0 20
Interviewer
knew identity
of Suspect in line up
21 15 36
TOTAL 41 15 56
P < .0001
The Central Issue of INFERENCE
(‘profiling’)
Actions
Characteristics
1. Features – what distinguishes the
offence/offender?
2.Characteristics – what can we assume
about the offender?
3. Linking – which other crimes has the
offender committed?
4. Location – where might s/he be based?
5. Prediction – what might s/he do next?
Science is a way of ‘going
beyond the data’. (una forma de ir más allá de los datos)
This is done be building
models/theories/explanations
or ‘laws’.
We need these to develop
inference processes.
UNDERSTANDING
CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR
Entender el comportamiento criminal
犯罪者の行動を理解する
Offenders live implicit narratives
Los delincuentes viven narrativas implícitas
Narratives of
Murder
Significant event –◦ Kids using his house to doss, so I threw them out,
battered them all
Murder◦ To let him know he just couldn’t do that. (“That was
my night ruined”) .
Life as Film◦ Brave Heart or Rob Roy, dishing out punishment for
wrongdoing.
Significant event –◦ Fell on concrete because showing off to girls but did not
indicate he was hurt.
Murder◦ Angry because he could not be the bread-winner. Hit his
son because he would not listen to him.
Life as Film◦ Cub turns into a full grown man. Would win the Oscars.
A Personal Construct Perspective* on the Narratives of Terrorists
* George
Kelly (1956)
Bombing
in
Mombai
REPERTORY GRID DERIVED FROM
AN INTERVIEW
WITH A CONVICTED TERRORIST
PCA of Grid for Activist Leader
PCA of Grid for Terrorist Subordinate
DECISION SUPPORT
Soporte a la Decisión
技術は、意思決定を支援する
Many Publications that show how you can
determine where an offender is living from
where he commits a crime. Known as
‘geographical profiling’.
• Dragnet
•DragnetP
•An interactive system designed for use on a PC with minimal training, allowing context sensitive modification.
•Developed as a support tool to indicate the likelihood of the offender living at any given location and the implications of linking local crimes.
•Has features that enable it to be an effective research tool.
1. Studies of criminal spatial behaviour –
basic research.
2. Development of decision support tools
that incorporate research findings.
3. Studies of the effectiveness of these
applications.
4. Explorations of how such tools may help
police investigations and relates training
etc.
Geographical Offender Profiling
Consists of:
Published
1977
An Offender’s ‘Mental Map’ of his crimes
‘MARAUDERS’
The ‘Circle Hypothesis’
The Decay Function (one off or series)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
8000
1 5
10
1
15
20
Frequency of
Offending
Distance from Home (km)
Average Distances
for Burglary
0.9 to 2.9 km
Schematic Decay Function
Offence Map:
Developing the Search Tool
1st Crime2nd
3rd
4th
5th
Home base
The Mardi Gra Bombings
Interface with crime sites
The Mardi Gra Bombings
Dragnet analysis superimposed on a map of London
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Rank
Cu
mu
lati
ve
% o
f S
am
ple
Centre of Circle
Centroid
First Offence
Last Offence
Logarithmic Function
Exponential Function
Offender 1:
34 CRIMES
1 HOME LOCATION
Offender
34 crimes
1 home location
Offender 2:
34 CRIMES
1 HOME LOCATION
Offender 34 crimes1 home location
2 Offenders with different distributions of crimes in relation to Sopping Centre
Southside Centre
Offender
34 crimes
1 home location
Offender 34 crimes1 home location
The Future: Taking account of local conditions
The next generation
Current Development:
A Ψ - GOP Integrated into •GIS with •Temporal search capability
Time slider
Burglary Location
Offender Residence
Two crime locations
Probability surface
Most probable home location
Three crimes
Integrating with GIS allows detailed examination
Street view of crime location
Street view of offender residence
Five crimes
16 Crimes
56 Crimes
International Research Centre for Investigative Psychology
The University of Huddersfieldwww.davidcanter.com www.ia-ip.org