Upload
nilusha-rajashilpa
View
76
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Improving of Adhesion in Laminated Rubber Glove Process and
Incorporation of Recycled Coagulated Centrifuged Latex
R.G.N LakmaliUWU/PLT/09/0020Palm and Latex Technology and Value AdditionUva Wellassa University
IntroductionNatural Rubber Latex is the major synthesizedcommercial product by the rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) tree
Production of NR 2011(Actual) to 2014(forecast) (‘000tonnes)
Source: International Rubber Study Group ( IRSG )
Region 2011 2012 2013 2014
Asia 10281 10659 10986 11628
Africa 470 491 518 548
Latin America 48 48 50 52
World 11004 11406 11771 12453
Natural rubber based products-Dry rubber products
eg: Laminated gloves,Tyre, Caster wheels-Latex products
eg: balloons, surgical gloves, cast products
What is a Laminated glove?
It is coming under household category use for heavy dutypurposes and for construction industry which is made byusing a laminated rubber sheet as a composite to palmarea with textile fabrics(Kevlar ,Cotton)
Problem IdentificationLow adhesion property of laminated gloves
-reducing of other mechanical properties (abrasion , tear, punch, cut)
- lower the quality and the demand in the international market
High moisture content of coagulated centrifuged latex-unable to direct incorporate with laminated rubber sheet process- large wastage avoiding recycling with high cost
Main Objective
Enhance the adhesion ability between the laminatedrubber sheet and two types of fabrics, Kevlar and Cotton
Introducing of new recycle method to reduce themoisture content coagulated centrifuged latex
Specific ObjectivesFix the accurate amount of secondary solvent (SBP) to adjust the correct viscosity and the TSC of the adhesive
Modify the current existing process line with controlling steps and new technical adjustments
Change the amount of ingredients of existing formula of adhesive
Check the potential of incorporation of recycled rubber as a filler to fulfill 20% of requirement
Materials and Methods
Basic Ingredients
Crepe rubber Compounding materials
(Chemicals) Fabric (Kevlar, Cotton) Coagulated centrifuged
latex
Machines
Two roll mill ,Mixing machine
Calendaring roll Bale cutter Drying machine
, Oven, Autoclave Brook field Viscometer Tensile TesterHardness testing machine Cut resistance machine Digital weighting Machine
Preliminary Experiment
Identification of mostly affecting process steps and factors for adhesion ability by observation
•The adhesive preparation•Smoothing•Maturing•curing Conditions( temperature, time)•type of the fabric (Kevlar , the Cotton
Crepe
Fabric
Coating
Drying
Sticking
Curing
Glove
Milling
CalendaringAdhesive
Smoothing
Maturing
Laminated Rubber Glove Process
Experiment 1:Fix the accurate amount of secondary solvent (SBP) to adjust the correct viscosity and the TSC(Total Solid Content) of the adhesive
Complete Randomized Design(CRD)
Necessary SBP Amount to the Blend
1 sample
2 sample
3 sample
4 sample
5 sample
6 sample
Adhesive compound + Primary solvent(ml)
100 100 100 100 100 100
SBP volume(ml) 0 50 100 200 300 400
Treatment Name T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6
Experiment 2: Modify the Current Existing ProcessLine with Controlling Steps and New TechnicalAdjustmentsSmoothing turns
Maturing period(hours)
Curing temperatureand Time
Sample number
Adhesion Value
0Ϲ Minute
One turn Just after unloading from former
155 40 3
160 30 10
120 90 11
24 155 40 5
160 30 6
120 90 7
48 155 40 2
160 30 8
120 90 9
Smoothing turns
Maturing period(hours)
Curing temperatureand Time
Sample number
Adhesion Value
0Ϲ Minute
Two turn Just after unloading from former
155 40 1160 30 13120 90 12
24 155 40 14160 30 15120 90 16
48 155 40 4160 30 17120 90 18
Modified Steps of process linesCRD method
Experiment 3: Changing the Amount(parts) of Ingredients of Existing Formula of Adhesive
Two Factors Factorial CRD methodIngredients Former amount Changed amount Examples
Raw Rubber 0.5 same Crepe rubber
Activator 0.025 same Zinc Oxide
Accelerator, Scorch Resistance 0.007 same M.B.T.S
Dispersing agent, plasticizer 0.006 same Stearic acid
Accelerator 0.001 same T.M.T.D
Lubricant 0.005 same
Coupling agent 0.01 same
Tackifier 0.125 0.140 Wood Resin
lubricant, softening agent 0.0125 Same Petroleum jelly
Cross linking agent 0.008 Same Sulphur
Experiment 4
Reduce the moisture content of coagulated centrifuged latex
CRD method
Coagulated centrifuged latex(5kg)
Drying(sun drying- 4 days, 1.5 days, near autoclave )
Laminated sheet
Partition
Milling with batch
Measuring moisture content
For experiment I, II, III and IV – Adhesion test
For experiment IV - mechanical tests (abrasion , tear, punch, cut)
-Tensile test(After and before ageing)-Rheograph -Moisture content
Minitab statistical software was used to analyze the data
Results and Discussion
Experiment 01:Adhesion of laminated gloves
0
5
10
15
20
25
T0 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6
Mean adhesion(N)
T0T1T2T3T4T5T6
Treatment Name
Adhe
sion
(New
ton)
Experiment 01:Adhesion of laminated gloves Treatment Name Mean ± SD
T0 11.983±1.535BC
T1 18.95±3.73AB
T2 14.97±1.90ABC
T3 12.48±1.44BC
T4 20.613±0.757A
T5 11.16±2.64C
T6 15.40±4.02ABC
Value with the differentletter as superscripts issignificantly different at thelevel of 5%. Results arepresent as mean ± SD
Ratio of amount of Adhesive compound and Primary solvent to SBP - 1:2
Viscosity and TSC values for each adhesion level of adhesive
Mean ValueTreatmentName
T0(control)
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6
Viscosity(rpm)
10.5 100 100 100 78.7 20.3 0.3
TSC 86 70.7 88.7 90.3 93.7 96.3 96
Experiment 02:adhesion under modified process lines
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 T11 T12 T13 T14 T15 T16 T17 T18
Mean Adhesion T1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9T10T11T12T13T14T15T16T17T18
Treatment Name
Adhe
sion
(New
ton)
Value with thedifferent letter assuperscripts issignificantly differentat the level of 5%.Results are present asmean ± SD
Treatment Mean ± SD Treatment Mean ± SD
T1 8.26±0.551E T10 14.89±1.649BC
T2 11.067 ±1.67CDE T11 15.95±1.64B
T3 9.110±0.721DE T12 10.73± 0.643CDE
T4 6.653 ±1.166E T13 17.10± 1.637B
T5 14.417±0.52BC T14 14.37±2.97BC
T6 13.493±0.50BCD T15 10.89±0.185CDE
T7 9.800±0.346DE T16 26.03± 3.19A
T8 17.36± 0.651B T17 10.55±1.91CDE
T9 16.90±0.954B T18 14.50±0.436BC
T16 Process line
Two smoothing turns- creates the even and the smooth surface ,prevent bends, remove the trapped air and barrier to entering the moisture
24 hour maturing period- Optimum chemical reactions and bonding formation
Curing Conditions (120 0Ϲ,90 minutes) - optimum curing and bonding formation
Smoothing Two Turns
24 hour Maturing
period
Curing ,120 0Ϲ,90 minutes
Fabr
ic
Lam
inat
ed sh
eet
Coat
ing
Adhe
sive
Experiment 03-Adhesion under changed woodresin amount and curing conditions
Adhesion of gloves against wood resin and changed curing temperature and Time
Value on the same line with the same letter assuperscripts is not significantly different at the level of 5%.Results are present as mean ± SD
Temperature 0Ϲ/Time (minutes)
Wood Resin(g) 1200Ϲ /90min 1550Ϲ /40min 1600Ϲ/30min
125 11.3±0.93B 8.1±1.183 B 8.8±1.240 B
140 23.5±3.35 A 11.9±0.907B 9.6±1.303B
Wood Resin- Common raw material to increasing of adhesion ability
Experiment 04 - Comparison of Adhesion , Punch , Tear , Cut , Abrasion, Tensile strength Before Ageing and After Ageing , Moisture content and Rheograph Characteristics of controlled and blend sample
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Control
Blend
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Maximum Torque Scorch Time T 90
Control
Blend
P values for relevant tests
Moisture content- 0.8554
Mechanical Testing
Abrasion(levels) - 0.957 Cut(levels) - 0.685 Tear(levels) - 0.988 Punch(levels)- 0.653 Tensile Strength (Before
ageing) MPa- 0.6359 Tensile Strength(After ageing)
Mpa - 0.216
Rheograph Characteristics
Maximum Torque(Lb-in)-0.1843 Scorch Time (Minutes)-0.632 T90 (Minutes)-0.156
• There is no significant difference between the control and the blend at the level of 5%
• The blend with recycled rubber suitable as the filler ingredient
Conclusion
The accurate viscosity and TSC values which are78.7rpm and 93.7 of the adhesive with the 1:2 ratio ofsolvents , the high amount of wood resin with lowcuring temperature with 120 0Ϲ and the high curingtime 90 minutes, two times smoothing times and the24 hours maturing period are majorly affect for thehighest value of the adhesion
There is a potential to incorporate the recycled coagulatedcentrifuged latex as the cost reduction filler ingredient withthe compounding to fulfill the 20% of requirement instant thecrepe rubber under the accurate operation conditions
Limitations
Uneven application of the adhesive on the laminated sheet
Excessive stock /deficiency of stock cause to change the maturing period
More time taken with drying of coagulated centrifuged latex
Recommendations
Punctually measuring of viscosity and TSC of the adhesive and following of modified process line with recommended wood resin content
Recycle of coagulated centrifuged latex as a cost reduction process
Reducing of drying time with Proper oven system of coagulated centrifuged latex
ReferencesMartin,J.M,(M.Sc,Ph.D,C.Eng),Smith W.K,(C.Eng),Handbook of RubberTechnology. Volume 03, Identification ,Testing, Recycling and PollutionControl in Rubber Industry,ed.by Bhatia,C.S. (B.E(Chemical),M.B.A),PUBLISHERS AND DISTRIBUTERS,NEW DELHI,BANGALORE
White J.L, Rubber Processing Technology. Materials andPrinciples,Hanser Publishers, Munich Vienne New York, Hanser/GenderPublications,Inc,Cincinati
Freakley P.K, Rubber Process and Production Organization, Institute ofPolymer Technology, Southborough University ofTechnology, Loughborough,United Kingdom, Plenum Press, New York andLondon
Polaski G, Means J, Stull B, Warren P, Allen K, Mowrey D, and CarneyB,Bonding Elastomers: A Review of Adhesives and Processes, (LordCorporation)
AcknowledgementDr. G . Chandresena, Dean , Faculty of Animal Science and Export Agriculture
Dr. Saman Herath, Faculty of Animal Science and Export Agriculture
Mr.Thameera Ranasinghe,External Supervisor, Manager Technical,Workwear Lanka(Pvt) Ltd
Ms. H.A.S.L Jayasinghe,Internal Supervisor, Faculty of Animal Science and Export Agriculture
Dr. Susantha Siriwardhene,Head of Dry Rubber Department , Rubber Research Institute ,Rathmalana