15
1 G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS GAUTRANS APT GAUTRANS APT ELZBIETA SADZIK MAY 2002

GAUTRANS APT

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

GAUTRANS APT. ELZBIETA SADZIK MAY 2002. SPECIFICATIONS FOR HVS MARK III AND MARK IV. COST BENEFIT: HVS III vs HVS IV. 57% Decrease in total production cost 50 % Increase in production 19% Decrease in Fuel consumption 56% Decrease in down time. Comparative Cost: HVS III vs HVS IV. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

1

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS

GAUTRANS APTGAUTRANS APT

ELZBIETA SADZIK

MAY 2002

SPECIFICATIONS FOR HVS MARK III AND MARK IVSPECIFICATIONS FOR HVS MARK III AND MARK IV

HVS Mark IV+ HVS Mark III

Moving Constant (30 – 205 kN) and Dynamic Loads (mean dynamic load 36 – 88 kN)

Only Moving Constant Loads (30 – 200 kN)

Maximum 32 000 passes / 24h

Maximum 25 000 passes / 24h

Random (user-definable) wandering pattern

Fixed wandering pattern

3

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS

COST BENEFIT: HVS III vs COST BENEFIT: HVS III vs HVS IVHVS IV

• 57% Decrease in total production cost

50 % Increase in production 19% Decrease in Fuel consumption56% Decrease in down time

4

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS

Comparative Cost: HVS III vs Comparative Cost: HVS III vs HVS IVHVS IV

• HVS Mk III: 80 cents/load repetition

• HVS Mk IV+: 50 cents/load repetition

Ju

l-9

4

Ja

n-9

5

Au

g-9

5

Fe

b-9

6

Se

p-9

6

Ma

r-9

7

Oc

t-9

7

Ma

y-9

8

No

v-9

8

Ju

n-9

9

De

c-9

9

Ju

l-0

0

Ja

n-0

1

Au

g-0

1

Ma

r-0

2

S702

D2388

N1

D2388

P243/1

P243/1

HVS testing sitesHVS testing sites

Testing subjectsTesting subjectsRoad No.

Test topic Output Info dissemination

S702 Low-volume roads

Performance rating of various surface treatments

1st & 2nd level analysis reports

D2388 Labour-intensive construction

Cost-benefit rating WM guideline ETB struct. design

for Sabita Manual 21

Seminar & site visit for local road authorities - 1996

WM seminar –

October 2000

N1

P243/1 Deep in situ recycling

FB guideline Behaviour model Material class. ME design method

Workshop – Jan ‘01

Workshop – April ‘02

Seminars – June ‘02

7

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS

HVS accompanied tests HVS accompanied tests

• LaboratoryStandard laboratory

Grading, Atterberg, OMC/MDD (untreated) CBR, UCS, ITS

Advanced laboratory Flexural beam test (FBT) Static and dynamic triaxial (STT and DTT)

Durability Permeability Wheel-tracking erosion (WTE) and mechanical brush

(MBT)

8

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS

HVS accompanied testsHVS accompanied tests

• FieldHVS

Material characterisation Field moisture and density, environmental data Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) Deflection, permanent deformation and rut

LTPP Visual evaluation Deflections Traffic survey

9

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS

Test matrix for foam-treated Test matrix for foam-treated materialmaterial

Recycled material

Active filler content

Binder content

None Low

(0,5 – 2 %)

Intermediate

(2 – 4 %)

High

(4 – 6 %)

Recycled CTB with foamed bitumen treatment

(P243/1)

None Std lab

Adv Lab

UCS, ITS

FBT

Low

(0,5 – 1,5 %)

UCS, ITS

FBT

UCS, ITS

FBT

Std lab

Adv Lab

Durability

UCS, ITS

FBT

Intermediate

(1,5 – 3,0 %)

UCS, ITS

FBT

Std lab

Adv Lab

Durability

HVS

10

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS

Test matrix forTest matrix foremulsion-treated materialemulsion-treated material

Recycled material

Active filler content

Binder content

None Low

(0,5 – 2 %)

Intermediate

(2 – 4 %)

High

(4 – 6 %)

Recycled CTB with emulsion treatment

(P243/1)

None Std lab

Adv Lab

UCS, ITS

FBT

UCS, ITS

FBT

Low

(0,5 – 1,5 %)

UCS, ITS

FBT

UCS, ITS

FBT

UCS, ITS

FBT Durability

Intermediate

(1,5 – 3,0 %)

UCS, ITS

FBT

Std lab

Adv Lab

Durability

HVS

UCS, ITS

FBT

HVS managementHVS management

Steering Committee

Technical management

NeedsScope

Prioritisation

Technical panel

Proposals Reports Guidelines

Review Pool

12

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS

Issues discussedIssues discussed

• Unanimous agreement on historical benefit of HVS research for pavement engineering in South Africa and a need to continue

• Needs identified:Long-term research objectiveAd hoc needs (proof testing)

13

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS

““Steering Committee” Steering Committee” identified needsidentified needs

• Cold-mix recycling• Rut-resistant solutions• Ultra-thin & thin concrete layers• Appropriate asphalt overlays &

seals• New cement / high UCS layers

14

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS

““Steering Committee” Steering Committee” identified needsidentified needs

• Composite pavements• Cost-effective solutions for low-

volume roads• Risk assessment & management• Vehicle-pavement interaction

15

G AUTRANS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, ROADS & WORKS

ProposalProposal

• It is proposed that an APT Steering Committee be established as a sub-committee of the RPF