28
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS L TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

TOPIC 2:

INFORMATION PROCESSING

Page 2: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

○ Stage approach○ Ecological approach○ Cognitive engineering (ergonomics)

Three Approaches to Information Processing

Page 3: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

Three Approaches to Information Processing

Page 4: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

1. Selective Attention○ SEEV○ P(A) = sS-efEF+exEX+vV2. Focused Attention○ Clutter or noise

Selecting Information

Page 5: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

3. Discrimination○ Parse the world into its meaningful com-

ponents○ Space, color, intensity, frequency, etc.

○ Easier to focus attn. on one and ignore dis-traction from another

Selecting Information

Page 6: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

4. Visual Search○ Serial self-terminating search○ thwarted by three factors

○ Bottom-up parallel processing, top-down process-ing – Guided search model (Wolfe, 2000)

○ target familiarity

Selecting Information

Page 7: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

1. Detection as Decision Making○ SDT

○ Optimal response criterion – signal proba-bility and payoffs

Perception and Data Interpretation

Page 8: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

3. Judgment of 2D Position and Extent○ Spatial judgment prone to systemic distortions

○ Overestimate for bar graphs○ Perceptual flattening of the line○ Pie chart

Perception and Data Interpretation

Page 9: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

Perception and Data Interpretation

Page 10: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

4. Judgment of Distance and Size in 3D○ Depth cues – pictorial cues

Perception and Data Interpretation

Page 11: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

5. Dynamic Display, Mental Model, Analog Compatibility

○ Compatibility with the operator’s MM○ Code congruence○ congruent mapping○ Movement compatibility

Perception and Data Interpretation

Page 12: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

6. Perceptual Organization, Display Organi-zation, and Proximity Compatibility

○ Perceptual organization○ Gestalt psychologists

Perception and Data Interpretation

Page 13: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

○ Proximity compatibility principle

Perception and Data Interpretation

Page 14: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

1. WM Limitations○ Duration and capacity○ Baddeley (1986, 1999)

○ Phonological loop (verbal WM)○ Visuospatial sketch pad (visual WM)○ Central executive

Comprehension and Cognition

Page 15: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

2. Dynamic WM, Keeping Track, SA○ Endsley (1995)

○ Level I – perception (selective attn., attentional cap-ture)

○ Level II – comprehension (WM – schema, LTWM)○ Level III – projection (LTM – MM)

Comprehension and Cognition

Page 16: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

4. Spatial Awareness and Navigation4.1 Geographical Knowledge○ Landmark knowledge○ Route knowledge○ Survey knowledge

Comprehension and Cognition

Page 17: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

4.2 Navigation Aids

Comprehension and Cognition

Page 18: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

4.2 Navigation Aids

Comprehension and Cognition

Page 19: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

5. Planning and Problem Solving5.1 Planning○ Script in LTM; Guess work and mental simu-

lation1. Heavy demands on WM2. Planning horizon tends to be fairly short3. Biased by availability heuristic

Comprehension and Cognition

Page 20: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

5.2 PS, Diagnosis and TS○ pattern-matching Naturalistic DM○ Iterative diagnostic tests until diagnosed○ 3 characteristics of human cognition

1. Cognitive resource demands and their vulnerability to interference grow

2. Past experience can benefit for diagnosis and PS but the problem of functional fixedness

3. Confirmation bias and cognitive tunneling

Comprehension and Cognition

Page 21: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

1. Information and Uncertainty○ Bandwidth (bits/sec)○ Rasmussen (1986)

1. Knowledge-based behavior2. Rule-based3. Skill-based

Action Selection

Page 22: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

2. Complexity of Choice○ Hick (1952)○ Decision complexity advantage3. Probability and Expectancy4. practice○ Increases both speed and accuracy

Action Selection

Page 23: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

5. Spatial Compatibility○ The compatibility between a display and its

associated controlI. Location○ Principle of location compatibility

○Principle of collocation, principle of congru-ence

Action Selection

Page 24: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

II. Control movement○ Intention-R-S (IRS) compatibility

○Clockwise increase stereotype○The proximity movement stereotype○Global congruence

Action Selection

Page 25: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

6. ModalityI. Voice options more possible responsesII. More compatible ways of transmitting

symbolic or verbal infoIII. Valuable when the eyes and hands

Action Selection

Page 26: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

7. Response Discriminability8. Feedback9. Continuous Control○ Fitts’ Law

○MT = a + b log2(2A/W)

Action Selection

Page 27: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

1. Serial Processing○ Reminders – checklists○ Heavy involvement (high WL) may neglect a

second task2. Concurrent Processing

2.1 Task Similarity○ Similarity btn tasks may induce confusion

Multiple-Task Performance

Page 28: I NDUSTRIAL E NGINEERING C OGNITIVE E RGONOMICS L AB TOPIC 2: INFORMATION PROCESSING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING

COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB

2.2 Task Demand○ Easier task more likely concurrently than

more difficult of demanding2.3 Task Structure○ Multiple resource theory

○ Processing codes (verbal vs. spatial), processing stage (perceptual-cognitive vs. response), perceptual modality (auditory vs. visual), visual subsystems (fo-cal vs. ambient)

Multiple-Task Performance