Upload
harriet-wood
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
TOPIC 2:
INFORMATION PROCESSING
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
○ Stage approach○ Ecological approach○ Cognitive engineering (ergonomics)
Three Approaches to Information Processing
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
Three Approaches to Information Processing
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
1. Selective Attention○ SEEV○ P(A) = sS-efEF+exEX+vV2. Focused Attention○ Clutter or noise
Selecting Information
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
3. Discrimination○ Parse the world into its meaningful com-
ponents○ Space, color, intensity, frequency, etc.
○ Easier to focus attn. on one and ignore dis-traction from another
Selecting Information
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
4. Visual Search○ Serial self-terminating search○ thwarted by three factors
○ Bottom-up parallel processing, top-down process-ing – Guided search model (Wolfe, 2000)
○ target familiarity
Selecting Information
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
1. Detection as Decision Making○ SDT
○ Optimal response criterion – signal proba-bility and payoffs
Perception and Data Interpretation
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
3. Judgment of 2D Position and Extent○ Spatial judgment prone to systemic distortions
○ Overestimate for bar graphs○ Perceptual flattening of the line○ Pie chart
Perception and Data Interpretation
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
Perception and Data Interpretation
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
4. Judgment of Distance and Size in 3D○ Depth cues – pictorial cues
Perception and Data Interpretation
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
5. Dynamic Display, Mental Model, Analog Compatibility
○ Compatibility with the operator’s MM○ Code congruence○ congruent mapping○ Movement compatibility
Perception and Data Interpretation
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
6. Perceptual Organization, Display Organi-zation, and Proximity Compatibility
○ Perceptual organization○ Gestalt psychologists
Perception and Data Interpretation
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
○ Proximity compatibility principle
Perception and Data Interpretation
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
1. WM Limitations○ Duration and capacity○ Baddeley (1986, 1999)
○ Phonological loop (verbal WM)○ Visuospatial sketch pad (visual WM)○ Central executive
Comprehension and Cognition
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
2. Dynamic WM, Keeping Track, SA○ Endsley (1995)
○ Level I – perception (selective attn., attentional cap-ture)
○ Level II – comprehension (WM – schema, LTWM)○ Level III – projection (LTM – MM)
Comprehension and Cognition
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
4. Spatial Awareness and Navigation4.1 Geographical Knowledge○ Landmark knowledge○ Route knowledge○ Survey knowledge
Comprehension and Cognition
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
4.2 Navigation Aids
Comprehension and Cognition
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
4.2 Navigation Aids
Comprehension and Cognition
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
5. Planning and Problem Solving5.1 Planning○ Script in LTM; Guess work and mental simu-
lation1. Heavy demands on WM2. Planning horizon tends to be fairly short3. Biased by availability heuristic
Comprehension and Cognition
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
5.2 PS, Diagnosis and TS○ pattern-matching Naturalistic DM○ Iterative diagnostic tests until diagnosed○ 3 characteristics of human cognition
1. Cognitive resource demands and their vulnerability to interference grow
2. Past experience can benefit for diagnosis and PS but the problem of functional fixedness
3. Confirmation bias and cognitive tunneling
Comprehension and Cognition
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
1. Information and Uncertainty○ Bandwidth (bits/sec)○ Rasmussen (1986)
1. Knowledge-based behavior2. Rule-based3. Skill-based
Action Selection
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
2. Complexity of Choice○ Hick (1952)○ Decision complexity advantage3. Probability and Expectancy4. practice○ Increases both speed and accuracy
Action Selection
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
5. Spatial Compatibility○ The compatibility between a display and its
associated controlI. Location○ Principle of location compatibility
○Principle of collocation, principle of congru-ence
Action Selection
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
II. Control movement○ Intention-R-S (IRS) compatibility
○Clockwise increase stereotype○The proximity movement stereotype○Global congruence
Action Selection
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
6. ModalityI. Voice options more possible responsesII. More compatible ways of transmitting
symbolic or verbal infoIII. Valuable when the eyes and hands
Action Selection
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
7. Response Discriminability8. Feedback9. Continuous Control○ Fitts’ Law
○MT = a + b log2(2A/W)
Action Selection
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
1. Serial Processing○ Reminders – checklists○ Heavy involvement (high WL) may neglect a
second task2. Concurrent Processing
2.1 Task Similarity○ Similarity btn tasks may induce confusion
Multiple-Task Performance
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS LAB
2.2 Task Demand○ Easier task more likely concurrently than
more difficult of demanding2.3 Task Structure○ Multiple resource theory
○ Processing codes (verbal vs. spatial), processing stage (perceptual-cognitive vs. response), perceptual modality (auditory vs. visual), visual subsystems (fo-cal vs. ambient)
Multiple-Task Performance