I d i NAMA t Indonesia NAMAs concept: Land-based Sector

Yuliana C. Wulan, Philippe Guizol, Heiner von Luepke

ICRAF NAMA Half Day Seminar, 25 February 2011

Outline

Indonesian NAMAs Development Indonesian NAMAs Development Land-based NAMAs: scope and cross

cutting issues linking to National cutting issues – linking to National REDD+

Baseline (BAU) and target line Baseline (BAU) and target line MRV Prioritizing mitigation actions Prioritizing mitigation actions Next Steps

Indonesia’s NAMAs Development Indonesia s NAMAs Development

Indonesian NAMAs - RAN GRK (Draft Perpres)

Unilateral: self-financing (26% from the National Unilateral: self-financing (26% from the National Baseline – Letter to UNFCCC, 30 Jan 2010).

Supported NAMAs (up to 41% with International pp ( psupport - G20 Meeting in Pittsburgh 2009).

RAN/GRK NAMAs: sectoral basis (forestry, / ( y,and peatland; agriculture; energy, transport and industry; and waste).

General NAMAs Concept in IndonesiaIndonesia

Scope and rationale,

Baseline (BAU) and sectoral target: nationally i t t d integrated,

Mitigation scenarios,

Potential costs and benefits Potential costs and benefits,

Priority mitigation actions,

Policies measures and instruments Policies, measures and instruments,

MRV

General NAMAs Concept in Indonesia

Source: Situmeang, 2011

WU1

Slide 5

WU1 proposed slide title: General NAMAs concept in Indonesia

The source will be an issue? I am bringing this up, as the paper is by no means approved or accepted by bappenas...informally we are working with it already in a lot of ways, but let us consult with Idai, if this can be already presented officially (just to be in the safe side)Windows User, 2/22/2011

Land Based NAMAs: starting from the land

Indonesia lands in million haTotal

Limited Total 

Permanent  Convertion  Total forest APL. Non Forest land 

Indonesia lands in million ha Forest lands 

Conservation Protection Production Production Forest Forest land  (Agriculture…) Total

Forest cover 15,2 23,0 18,8 22,1 79,1 11,0 90,1 8,3 98,5Non‐Forest cover 3 8 5 9 5 5 13 1 28 3 11 0 39 3 46 5 85 8cover 3,8 5,9 5,5 13,1 28,3 11,0 39,3 46,5 85,8Data deficiency 0,7 0,9 0,5 0,5 2,6 0,3 3,0 0,6 3,6Total 19,7 29,9 24,8 35,7 110,0 22,4 132,4 55,4 187,8, , , , , , , , ,% of Total 10% 16% 13% 19% 59% 12% 71% 29% 100%

About 67 % of emissions are land based (SNC 2010)

Source: Forest Statistics, MoFor 2009

About 67 % of emissions are land based (SNC, 2010)

WU2

Slide 6

WU2 to explain: actual forest stocks versus official land use type? And: can we use another term for "data deficiency"? something like "errorrange"?Windows User, 2/22/2011

Scope of land based NAMA

The scope of the Land based NAMAs The scope of the Land based NAMAs includes forests, forest and agri-plantations agroforestry and other plantations, agroforestry and other agriculture lands.

Land based NAMAs scope includes REDD+ Land based NAMAs scope includes REDD+ scope.

To be noticed: No explanations about particulations between land based NAMA & REDD in Cancun

h6

h7

Slide 7

h6 i thought peatlands can be found under any kind of land use type? Hence it is more a soil class and not strictly used for a particular land use type...so for scope setting we can say: all of the scopes can include as a special type "xxx land use type on peat" heiner, 2/22/2011

h7 can we say somewhere, why we are after all concerned about the issue of drawing the scope of REDD+ and other land based NAMAs? In my view because:- a clear scope will allow to establish BAU scenario/reference levels- the remaining NAMA/REDD+ elements can be established only if we know the respective scopeswe assume however, that design elements of NAMA and REDD in accordance with the indonesian concept are rather similar and hencemust be made compatible

heiner, 2/22/2011

Land based NAMAs and REDD+: why setting the scope

W d i t t d l d h f ll b We need an integrated landscape approach: full carbon accounting needed, avoiding that some activities not included in REDD+ are left unconsidered and vice versa

A l ill ll bli h BAU i / f l l A clear scope will allow to establish BAU scenario/reference levels

The remaining NAMA/REDD+ elements (mitigation scenarios, policies measures, instruments, mitigation actions, MRV) can be established only if we know the respective scopes

We assume however that design elements of NAMA and REDD in accordance with the Indonesian concepts are rather similar and hence must be made compatible

Land based NAMA: including National REDD+

REDD+ t l l d fi d (t it i l d REDD+ scope: not clearly defined (territorial and activities) – STRANAS REDD+, Cancun agreement

REDD+ modalities are more advanced compared to NAMA (i i i l fi idi NAMAs (inc. international finance support, guiding principle, etc.)

REDD+ Task Force (UKP4): establishing national REDD+ institutions, formulating REDD+ national strategy, designing financing instrument for all REDD+ activities in Indonesia, setting up framework and independent MRV institution

NAMAs will cover the broadest land use sector classifications and link to baseline/mitigation actions from all sectors

h8

h9

h10

Slide 9

h8 according to which source? stranas REDD+?heiner, 2/22/2011

h9 to add: "Gives the opportunity to learn for the formulation of remaining NAMAs"heiner, 2/22/2011

h10 when we speak about links...what is the implication of this bullet point?heiner, 2/22/2011

Scope of land based NAMA LAND BASED NAMAS

LAND USE TYPE  REDD+ SCOPELAND‐BASED NAMAS 

SCOPEPRIMARY FOREST (ON PERMANENT/ CONVERTIBLE FOREST AREA)

INCLUDE INCLUDE

SECONDARY FOREST (ON PERMANENT/

ND

SECONDARY FOREST (ON PERMANENT/ CONVERTIBLE FOREST AREA)

INCLUDE INCLUDE

LOGGED OVER FOREST ON PRODUCTION FOREST AREA (HPH/IUPHHK)

INCLUDE INCLUDE

AND PEATLA

TIMBER PLANTATION ON FOREST ZONE (HTI/HTR)

NOT CLEAR YET* INCLUDE

PRIVATE TIMBER PLANTATION (HUTANRAKYAT) ON APL

NOT CLEAR YET* INCLUDE

DRY

 LAND A RAKYAT) ON APL

O C C U

CROP PLANTATION (EG., RUBBER, COFFEE, COCOA)

NOT CLEAR YET* INCLUDE

AGROFOREST NOT CLEAR YET* INCLUDEAGROFOREST NOT CLEAR YET* INCLUDE

OIL PALM EXCLUDE INCLUDEOPEN FIELD FOOD CROPS EXCLUDE INCLUDE

RICE FIELD EXCLUDE INCLUDESETTLEMENTS/ROAD EXCLUDE INCLUDE

*GOI should clarify whether this should be include/exclude under national REDD+ scopeh11

Slide 10

h11 did you advance yet with your arguments for your expert judgment/recommendation?heiner, 2/22/2011

Baseline (BAU) and target lineof CO2

Land based BAU

Unilateral

Supported

M t 

Target line = BAU‐ X%

Historical baseline

Actual future trajectory?

Market

Years

Commitment periodPast Emissions

h12

Slide 11

h12 does this refer to the accumulated or point in time difference in the year 2020? (it is implied in the term target line that it is accumulated, but i wanted to be sure...)heiner, 2/22/2011

h14 as mentioned: please make sure that supported and market are two distinct ranges...here it sounds as if they are one and the sameheiner, 2/22/2011

MRV (Decision_/CP.16)

Internationally Supported Mitigation Actions will be

Measured, Reported and Verified (MRV) domestically and

ill b bj t t I t ti l M t R ti will be subject to International Measurement, Reporting

and Verification in accordance with Guidelines to be

developed under the Convention.p

Domestically Supported Mitigation Actions will be

Measured, Reported and Verified (MRV) Domestically in , p ( ) y

accordance with General Guidelines to be developed under

the Convention.

MRV Priorities for Land-based NAMAs

1 Defining credible Land based BAU and target line 1. Defining credible Land based BAU and target line (Clear assumptions…)

2. Derive MRV indicators: only possible after setting the f /scope of REDD+/LB NAMAs

3. Making MRV Institutions right (transparent, one National MRV institution – so that MRV institution for REDD+ should be inline with national MRV)

4. Advance Indonesia capacity for improving satellite imageries analysis emissions factors data on land imageries analysis, emissions factors, data on land management as well as for improving human resources though training

5 A i f ti t f d5. An information system on safeguards

h15

h16

Slide 13

h15 but you have one for REDD+ already...so you will have more than one eventually..or do you want to say that the UKP4 institution should do all MRV in all sectors? (fair enough, but that is not the plan, i think)heiner, 2/22/2011

h16 how would MRV differ according to REDD+ and remaining land based NAMAs?

MRV according to international standards and conducted by UKP4 new instittion for REDD+, whereas it would be up to the sectors andnational framework to decide how to do the MRV for remaining land based NAMAs?Another point to be mentioned: MRV indicators of REDD+ and land based NAMAs should be different, becuase they will be derived by the particular mitigation actions...heiner, 2/22/2011

Prioritizing Land based mitigation actions1 Pre requisite and enabling conditions1. Pre-requisite and enabling conditions2. Mitigation actions priorities should take into

account:1. Other Indonesian government policies, which

affect land use decisions (economic development, poverty reduction co-benefits)poverty reduction, co benefits).

2. Action effectiveness and practicality3. Cost-efficiency, which includes transaction costs,

investment costs and opportunity costs.4. Fairness (local community rights, social

safeguards)g )

Further Steps for Developing Indonesia NAMAs: R i d t bli h ti l li f k Review and establish common national policy framework

and legal systems related to lands Set up baseline for land-based sector that linked to

ti l BAU t l t t li d iti ti national BAU, sectoral target line, and mitigation scenarios

Set up MRV system (institutional and technical concept) Review potential abatement costs (inc. opportunity cost,

transaction and adm.cost) and benefits (inc. co-benefits and social safeguards)

Prioritize mitigation actions Formulating financing schemes and benefit-cost sharing

mechanisms

h17

Slide 15

h17 will this also be valid for the land based NAMAs including REDD+?heiner, 2/22/2011

National Centre for NAMAs Development OfficeWisma Bakrie II 6th Floor

Jl HR Rasuna Said Kav B 2Jl. HR Rasuna Said Kav. B-2Jakarta 12920

T +62-21-57945739F +62-21-57945739