16
1 Prompt Photon Production from Proton - proton Collisions at √s = 62.4 GeV in PHENIX ( PHENIX 実実実実実実実実実 62.4 GeV 実実実実 - 実実実実実実実 実実実実実実実実実実実実実 ) JPS meeting March 26th, 2008 26pZF-11 Kohichi Sakashita ( Tokyo Tech ) for the PHENIX Collaboration

JPS meeting March 26th, 2008 26pZF-11 Kohichi Sakashita ( Tokyo Tech )

  • Upload
    drea

  • View
    31

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Prompt Photon Production from Proton - proton Collisions at √ s = 62.4 GeV in PHENIX ( PHENIX 実験における重心系 62.4 GeV での陽子 - 陽子衝突からの 直接光子の生成断面積の測定 ). JPS meeting March 26th, 2008 26pZF-11 Kohichi Sakashita ( Tokyo Tech ) for the PHENIX Collaboration. Contents. Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: JPS meeting  March  26th, 2008 26pZF-11 Kohichi Sakashita ( Tokyo Tech )

1

Prompt Photon Production from Proton - proton Collisions at √s = 62.4 GeV in PHENIX

( PHENIX 実験における重心系 62.4 GeV での陽子 - 陽子衝突からの

直接光子の生成断面積の測定 ) JPS meeting

March 26th, 2008

26pZF-11

Kohichi Sakashita ( Tokyo Tech )

for the PHENIX Collaboration

Page 2: JPS meeting  March  26th, 2008 26pZF-11 Kohichi Sakashita ( Tokyo Tech )

2

Contents

1. Introduction

2. PHENIX detector and data set

3. Method of prompt photon measurement

4. Result

5. Summary

Page 3: JPS meeting  March  26th, 2008 26pZF-11 Kohichi Sakashita ( Tokyo Tech )

3

1-1. Introduction• Production of prompt photon

– Quark - gluon scattering is dominantsub-process at pp collision in√s = 62.4 GeV

• The related experiment– PHENIX √s = 200 GeV– R806, AFS, CCOR and CMOR using ISR collider at √s = 63 GeV in

CERN

• Test the applicability of perturbative QCD (pQCD)– Comparing the cross section of measurement to the one of pQCD calcul

ation• pQCD calculation in qg scattering :

– Once the applicable range of pQCD is determined, the framework of pQCD can be used to calculate other quantities of interest, in particular ALL

prompt photon

proton

gluon

quarkproton

dσ pp(qg )→γX

dpT

≅ dx1 ⋅dx2 ⋅q(x1)∫ ⋅g(x2) ⋅ ˆ σ qg →γX

q(x), g(x) : PDF for quark, gluon

  : sub-process cross section

ˆ σ

Page 4: JPS meeting  March  26th, 2008 26pZF-11 Kohichi Sakashita ( Tokyo Tech )

4

1-2. Introduction• Double helisity asymmetry ( ALL )

• Comparing to ALL in 200 GeV, large Bjorken’s x can be reached at 62.4 GeV

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 xT

xT =pT

s /2→ x

√s = 200 GeV

Page 5: JPS meeting  March  26th, 2008 26pZF-11 Kohichi Sakashita ( Tokyo Tech )

5

Proton beam

2. PHENIX Detector and Data Set • PHENIX central arm detector

= 90° x 2, || < 0.35

• Data set – 2006 pp run– Integrated luminosity : 0.065 pb-1

• Basic analysis cuts• EMCal&BBC trigger • Vertex cut |z| < 30 cm• Remove 2 edge towers, dead and hot

towers

– Event selection• pT > 2 GeV/c• Shower shape cut• Charge veto with PC3

prompt γ

Page 6: JPS meeting  March  26th, 2008 26pZF-11 Kohichi Sakashita ( Tokyo Tech )

6

3-1. Method of Prompt Photon Measurement

• Main issue of prompt photon measurement– Evaluation of systematic uncertainties

0 extraction and so on

– Prompt photon yields is small signal of all photon

• About 10 % at 3 GeV/c

Page 7: JPS meeting  March  26th, 2008 26pZF-11 Kohichi Sakashita ( Tokyo Tech )

7

3-2. Method of Prompt Photon Measurement

N prompt γ = Nall γ- (1+A)*(1+R)*Nγ tag

By measuring Nall γand Nγtag, one can extract small Nprompt γsignal

( tagging method )

detecting two photon from pi0 decaymissing one photon from pi0 decay eta, eta' and omega decay photonprompt photon

Nγ tag

N prompt γ

Nall γ

x R* Nγ tag

x A*(1+R)* Nγ tag

’ ωdecay photon– The ratio of ’and ω0 production to

production – The ratio of branching ratio of photon of

’and ω0 to the branching ratio of photon of

• A = Σσiσ Br i γ / Br -> γγ

i : ’ ω

decay photon– Detecting two photon ( N

γ tag )• Reconstruction invariant mass

– Missing one photon• Evaluated by fast MC simulation• The ratio ( R ) of the missing one ph

oton to detecting two photon

Page 8: JPS meeting  March  26th, 2008 26pZF-11 Kohichi Sakashita ( Tokyo Tech )

8

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

4-1. Result - cross section

• Cross section :

• pQCD calculation with NLO and CTEQ6M PDF agrees with experiment within theoretical uncertainty and experimental uncertainty

Ed3σ

dp3=

1

2πpT

⋅1

L⋅

ΔNγcorr

ΔpTΔη

Page 9: JPS meeting  March  26th, 2008 26pZF-11 Kohichi Sakashita ( Tokyo Tech )

9

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

4-2. Result - comparison of PHENIX √s = 200 GeV and ISR experiments

• Results of ISR agree with this result within the experimental uncertainty

• Cross section slope at √s = 200 GeV is gentler than one at √s = 62.4 GeV

Open black circle : PHENIX at √s = 200 GeV ( 2005 year )

The others : ISR experiments at √s = 63 GeV

Page 10: JPS meeting  March  26th, 2008 26pZF-11 Kohichi Sakashita ( Tokyo Tech )

10

5. Summary• Test the applicability of pQCD calculation

• Data set– pp collision at 2006 year √s = 62.4 GeV– Integrated luminosity : 0.065 pb-1

• Prompt photon yields as a function of pT are extracted by the 0 tagging method ( N prompt γ = Nall γ- (1+A)*(1+R)*N

γ tag ) with PHENIX central arm detector ( = 90° x 2, || < 0.35 )

• pQCD calculation with NLO and CTEQ6M PDF agrees with experiment within theoretical uncertainty and experimental uncertainty

• Results of ISR agree with this result within the experimental uncertainty

Page 11: JPS meeting  March  26th, 2008 26pZF-11 Kohichi Sakashita ( Tokyo Tech )

11

Back up

Page 12: JPS meeting  March  26th, 2008 26pZF-11 Kohichi Sakashita ( Tokyo Tech )

12

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

3-1. Method of Prompt Photon Measurement

• Main issue of prompt photon measurement– Evaluation of systematic

uncertainties0 extraction and so on

– Prompt photon yields is small signal of all photon

Pro

mp

t p

hot

on /

All

ph

oton

Page 13: JPS meeting  March  26th, 2008 26pZF-11 Kohichi Sakashita ( Tokyo Tech )

13

4. Result - systematic errors

• Error in Nγ tag

– Fit ( Gauss + pol.3 ) to the region of pi0 mass peak to extract 0 photon with 3 ( 105 < Mγγ < 165MeV/c2 )

– Difference of between Nγ tag with pol.2 and N

γ tag with pol.3 and between N

γ tag with 3 and Nγ tag w

ith 4 is assigned as the error

– 3.4 % to the Nγ tag with pol.3 and 3at 2 Ge

V/c

2.8 % to the Nγ tag with pol.3 and 3 at 3.75

GeV/c

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 14: JPS meeting  March  26th, 2008 26pZF-11 Kohichi Sakashita ( Tokyo Tech )

14

Nγcorr =

N promptγ

ε acceptance ⋅ε energysmering ⋅ε conversion ⋅ε BBCtrigger ⋅ε EMCaltrigger

Ed3σ

dp3=

1

2πpT

⋅1

L⋅

Nγcorr

dpT

Page 15: JPS meeting  March  26th, 2008 26pZF-11 Kohichi Sakashita ( Tokyo Tech )

15

4. Result - systematic errorsNeutral hadron contamination

Secondary origin

Error in 1+A

Dalitz decay pi0 partner photon conversion loss

Error in Nγtag

1+R (acceptance)

1+R (Minimum E cut)

1+R (Pi0 cross section slope)

Energy scale uncertainty

Luminosity uncertainty

Conversion error

BBC bias uncertaintyQ

uick

Tim

e™

an

d a

TIF

F (U

ncom

pre

sse

d) d

eco

mp

ress

or

are

nee

ded

to se

e th

is p

icture

.

Qu

ickTim

e™

an

d a

TIF

F (Uncom

pre

ssed

) de

com

pre

ssor

are

nee

de

d to

see th

is p

ictu

re.

W = prompt / inclusive Error of C is scaled by 1/W - 1

Page 16: JPS meeting  March  26th, 2008 26pZF-11 Kohichi Sakashita ( Tokyo Tech )

16x

xDG (x)

present x-range

GS-C

GS-C, ΔG = 1