70
- 1 - 토론회 자료집

Jw20150129 토론회자료집 내란음모 등 대법원 판결에 대한 비평 토론회

  • View
    225

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

제목 내란음모 등 대법원 판결에 대한 비평 토론회 일시 2015년 1월 29일(목) 오후 2시 30분 장소 변호사교육문화관 세미나실 주최 참여연대 / 민주사회를위한변호사모임 / 민주주의법학연구회 주제발표 주제1 대법원 전원합의체 판결의 내용과 약평 / 김칠준 변호사 (법무법인 다산 대표) 주제2 '내란선동' 인정 요건의 법적 문제와 표현의 자유 / 하태훈 고려대 법학전문대학원 교수 주제3 대법원 판결의 증거법적 쟁점 비평 / 오길영 교수 (신경대 경찰행정학과) 토론 토론1 내란음모 등 대법원 판결과 인권운동 / 박래군 소장 (인권중심 사람) 토론2 내란음모, 내란선동과 관련한 대법원 판결에 관하여 / 박주민 변호사 (법무법인 이공) 토론3 대법원 판결의 증거인정 법리와 관련하여 / 김필성 변호사 (법무법인 양재)

Citation preview

  • - 1 -

    : 2015 1 29() 14:30~17:00 : 2

  • - 2 -

    ( : )

    1 ( )

    2 ( / )

    3 ( / )

    1 , ( )

    2 ( )

    3 ( / )

    PROGRAM

  • - 3 -

    01. ( ) 4p

    02. ( ) 18p

    03. ( ) 25P

    04. ( ) 42p

    05. ( ) 51p

    06. [] ( ) 56P

    CONTENTS

  • - 4 -

    1

    1)

    1.

    2013. 8. 28. 33 . .

    , , 3 2013. 9. 25. ( 2013620), 2013. 9. 26. ( 2013624), STI, , 2013. 10. 24. ( 2013699). 7 .

    1 2), 4 50 . , , 2014. 2. 17. 12 10, , , , 7 7, 6 6, 4 4 [ 2014. 2. 17. 2013620, 624(), 699(), 851() 3)]

    1) . , 322 .

    2) , , 12.3) 1 . 2013851 2013. 12. 16.

    . .

  • - 5 -

    1 . . 1 . 4) 2 16 . 1 . 9 7, 5 5, 4 4, , , 3 3, 2 2 ( 2014. 8. 11. 2014762 5)).

    . . . 1( ) , ( ) 2015. 1. 22. , . ( , , ) , ( , , , ) ( 2014. 1. 22. 201410978 6)).

    2.

    2013. 5. 10. 5. 12. , . RO . .

    4) , , 9.5) .6) .

  • - 6 -

    .

    1. . . RO (1) RO (2) RO (3) () () (4) (5) (6) (7)

    .

    2. . . .

    3. 3 RO . 3 . .

    4. , . 2013. 5. 10. . 2013. 5. 12. .

  • - 7 -

    RO . RO , .

    , RO , RO 2013. , , RO 2013. 3. 3 , 2013. 3. , 2013. 5. 8. 2013. 5. 10. , , 2013. 5. 12. 22:00 .

    3. RO

    . 1

    1 RO . , , , 2013. 5. 10. 5. 12. . . , , , . RO .

    1 . 5. 10., 5. 12. . , 7), , RO . , 2013. 5. RO

    7) 1 . . . 1 . .

  • - 8 -

    .

    (2013. 5.) , 130 , RO 8). RO .

    1 RO , . RO .

    .

    1 RO .

    , RO , , RO RO ., , RO ., RO .

    , RO .

    8) 1 , , .

  • - 9 -

    , , 5 . (3 ) .

    RO , ,RO . 1 RO 2013. 5. RO .

    .

    .

    : RO , , , , , , , RO , 316 1 2 , , , , , , , , RO .

    : , , RO .

  • - 10 -

    : RO , RO .

    .

    4.

    . 1

    1 , RO , , , , 5. 12. , , , . , 5. 10., 5. 12. , , , , , , .

    RO . , . . 2013. 5. RO , RO .

    .

    .

    ,

  • - 11 -

    , , 9) . , . , , . .

    , , , , , . , , , , , . , .

    , , , , . .

    9) 1999. 11. 12. 993801 .

  • - 12 -

    , , , . . , .

    5. 12. , ( ) .

    .

    , 2 , , , , , . ( ) , .

    : 2 , . , , .

    : , . ,

  • - 13 -

    , ,

    : , , , , , , ,

    5.

    . 1

    1 , RO , 2013. 5. , 2013. 5. , , , , .

    RO , , 2013. 5. 10. 12. , , , , .

    .

  • - 14 -

    . .

    - : , , . .

    - : , . , , , , . , .

    - : , , , , , .

    , , , , , .

  • - 15 -

    10) . .

    .

    .

    : , . , , . , , , . , , .

    : , , , , , , .

    10) , 3 2014. 12. 15. .

  • - 16 -

    , , . , .

    . .

    : , , .

    : , , , , .

    : , , , , , , .

    .

    6. -

    , . .

  • - 17 -

    , , . . .

    , . , . 9 7, 5 5 . .

    * - ()

  • - 18 -

    2

    ( )

    I.

    1. (29). (28). . ( ) . 2 . 2 (, ) . 2 , . . .

    2. ( 1999. 11.12. 993801 ). . . ,

  • - 19 -

    . , . . ( 1981.1.23. 802756 ), , . . , . . . , , , , ( 1991.5.14, 91542).

    3. 2 , , 2 . . . ( ) . . . , , . ( 1981.1.23. 802756 )

  • - 20 -

    . , , .

    4. 2 . . , . . . . . . .

    II.

    1. 90 . , , , . , . () . . . , . ,

  • - 21 -

    30 2 3 . . . . . . , . . . . . , . () ( , ) . .

    2. . . .

  • - 22 -

    . . . . . . . . , , . . . .

    III.

    1. . .

  • - 23 -

    ? ?

    2. (). ? , , () . , ? 1 .

    3. () () . . . .

    IV.

  • - 24 -

    . ( ) . . . . . .

  • - 25 -

    3

    11)12)

    ( )[email protected]

    .

    1 22 2015.1.22. , 201410978 13) , . . . , . , . , , , . ? , . . , ? , ? .

    * 2013 () (NRF-2013S1A5A8022736).

    ** 2015 1 29 .

    13) 2014.8.11. , 2014762 , 1 2014.2.17. , 2013620, 624(), 699(), 851() .

  • - 26 -

    , . , ? . . . , .

    .

    1.

    . , 1 . 1 .

    1.1.

    1 .

    OO -828~838, 840~843 . OO , SD , . -830~836 , -837, 841, 843 OO . -828~838,840~843 ,

  • - 27 -

    . , OO , . : (OO , OO ; ).14)

    , , ,15) , , . . . . , . , . , SD () . .

    , . .

    2012. 8. 10. 15

    14) 1 , 150.15) OO ,

    SD , , 2012. 8. : 1 , 147.

  • - 28 -

    , , , .16)

    , ( ) . , . .

    1.2.

    1 .

    OO -839 -844~874 . , , , , , , , 2013. 5. 12. OO 4 , 3~7 , , OO

    16) , 2014762 (2014.4.10), 26.

  • - 29 -

    , , , , , OO , OO OO . , , , , OO , , , OO , , OO , OO OO . , ( ).

    , . , ,

  • - 30 -

    , 4 3-7 . . , . . , ? , . , , . . . . .

    2.

    2.1.

    .

    , (Hash) , ., , ,

  • - 31 -

    , OO, OO, OO, OO, OO , , , I-839, 844~850, 866~869 , I-851~865, 870~874 , ( I-839, 844~874) . ,

    , ( ).

    , , , , , . , 3 and or . , . .

    2.2.

    . ( ) . ,

  • - 32 -

    , , 2007.3.15. 20068869 2012.9.13. 20127461 .17) , , . .18) , . , , , . , , ,

    17) 44-45.18) 45.

  • - 33 -

    .

    .

    1.

    1.1.

    1 . .1 . , . . 1 , . , . , . .19)

    19) . , , (, ) , , (: ) , , : , , 22-23.

  • - 34 -

    1.2.

    ? , . 1 ( ) , , 1 , , 20) . , . .

    1.3.

    . , , , 3 .

    . 20) 2005.12.23. 20052945 .

  • - 35 -

    , ( ) . , ( ) , () . ( ) . ( ) . . ?

    2.

    2.1.

    . 2008. 12. 24. 20089414 . 1 , , , " . (dubbing) . . , .

  • - 36 -

    . , . ,21) .

    2.2.

    , . , . 2013.7.26. 20132511 . , (Hash) , , , , , , . , , , , ,

    21) 9, .

  • - 37 -

    . , , .

    2.3.

    . , . , . . . SD , . , ( ) (Hash) . . ? , . . . . . ?

  • - 38 -

    . . . . 1 ( ) .22) 23) , , , , . , . . , . , . , .

    .

    . . .

    22) . : , 47-51.

    23) , 49.

  • - 39 -

    . (Uniform Electronic Evidence Act) (authenticity) (integrity) (CanadianEvidence Act) 31.1 31.8 .24) .

    31.125) , . 31.226) . (the electronic documents system) , (consistently) (manifestly) .

    , 31.327) .

    24) , 2013 () NRF-2013S1A5A8022736 .

    25) Authentication of electronic documents 31.1: Any person seeking to admit an electronic document as evidence has the burden of proving its authenticity by evidence capable of supporting a finding that the electronic document is that which it is purported to be.

    26) Application of best evidence rule electronic documents 31.2: (1) The best evidence rule in respect of an electronic document is satisfied (a) on proof of the integrity of the electronic documents system by or in which the electronic document was recorded or stored; or (b) if an evidentiary presumption established under section 31.4 applies.(2) Despite subsection (1), in the absence of evidence to the contrary, an electronic document in the form of a printout satisfies the best evidence rule if the printout has been manifestly or consistently acted on, relied on or used as a record of the information recorded or stored in the printout.

    27) Presumption of integrity 31.3: For the purposes of subsection 31.2(1), in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the integrity of an electronic documents system by or in which an electronic document is recorded or stored is proven(a) by evidence capable of supporting a finding that at all material times the computer system or other similar device used by the electronic documents system was operating properly or, if it was not, the fact of its not operating properly did not affect the integrity of the electronic document and there are no other reasonable grounds to doubt the integrity of the electronic documents system;(b) if it is established that the electronic document was recorded or stored by a party who is adverse in interest to the party seeking to introduce it; or(c) if it is established that the electronic document was recorded or stored in the usual and ordinary course of business by a person who is not a party and who did not record or store it under the control of the party seeking to introduce it.

  • - 40 -

    . ( ) (at all material times) () , , . , .

    , 4 . 4 , 3~7 , , .

    . , . 3~7 , , .

    , . . . ,

  • - 41 -

    ( ) . 4 , . . . . , . , ., ?

    , 2015.1.22. , 201410978 ., 2014.8.11. , 2014762 ., 2014.2.17. , 2013620, 624(), 699(), 851() ., 2014762 , 2014.4.10.

  • - 42 -

    1

    28)

    ( )

    1.

    . . . .

    . , . 1644 (John Milton) , 1869 (John Stuart Mill) (On Liberty), 1919 Abrams (Oliver Wendel Holmes, Jr) .

    . ( ) .

    (On Liberty)

    28) 9 1 13 3 . .

  • - 43 -

    . (harm principle) . .

    1917 29) (context) (clear and present danger) . . ( ) . . .

    Whitney 30) .

    , Dennis 31) . (Fred Vison) , . . . (gravityof the evil) (probability) . . , . .

    Dennis

    29) Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919)30) Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927). (California

    Criminal Syndicalism Act) . . 6 .

    31) Dennis v. U.S., 341 U.S. 494 (1951)

  • - 44 -

    . 1957 Yates 32) (John Halan) (Smith Act)33) 34), . , (incitement test) .

    Brandenburg 35) (incitement test) . (Criminal Syndicalism Statue) . . (advocacy) (imminent) (inciting) (producing) (directed) (is likely to) . . . (advocacy) (incitement) . (is likely to) (imminent) . Brandenburg 1) , , 2) .

    32) Yates v. U.S., 354 U.S. 298 (1957)33) 1940

    . 34) 33 .35) Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969)

  • - 45 -

    Brandenburg Hess 36) . Hess . 100 , Hess . . , . , . . Brandenburg . .

    Brandenburg NAACP v.Claiborne Hardware . NAACP . . NAACP . Brandenburg .

    36) Hess v. Indiana. 414 U.S. 105 (1975)

  • - 46 -

    , , , , . (14)

    .(15)

    , ,

    . . . .

    1)Hess , 2)NAACP , 3) .

    2. 2015. 1. 22. 201410978 ( )

    .

    .

    , 1) ,2) , .

  • - 47 -

    . , , , . , , .

    .

    , .

    , Dennis . Dennis Brandenburg 1)Hess , 2)NAACP , 3) .

    Hess . NAACP .

    .

  • - 48 -

    2012. 12. 12. 3 , , 2013. 1. 25. , , 2013. 2. 12.3 . , 2013. 3. 5. , 2013. 3. 30. , 4. 9. . 1 , 2013. 5. 7. 5 , 2013.5. 18. 20. 5 .(17)

    .

    7 1 "", "", "", " ", " " 37)., , . [] .38)

    1991 7 1 1990. 4. 2. 89113 , , ,

    37) 1990.4.2. 8911338) 1996 10 4 952

  • - 49 -

    . . , [] .

    . .39) .40)

    . . - - . Dennis , . , .

    39) 2007.12.13. 2007725740) 2008.4.17. 2003758

  • - 50 -

    . , . . . .

    Dennis 1951 . . , , . . . 1950 . . -- .

    1950 . , .

  • - 51 -

    2

    ( )

    1.

    2015. 1. 22. 201410978 , . . , . , .

    , , , .

    2.

    , . , . , .

    .

  • - 52 -

    . , , . .

    . . . , , .

    , , .

    . , , . 10 , IT 3.3 , .

    , 2009 IEEE . , IT .

    , .

  • - 53 -

    , , .

    , .

    , . , , .41)

    , . , .

    , , . , , .

    , .

    , , , . , . ,

    41) 308 .

  • - 54 -

    , .

    , , , . 0, 1 , .

    , , . , .

    , . , , IT , .

    , , , . , .

    3.

  • - 55 -

    , . 1 , 1 .42)

    , , , .

    4.

    . , , .

    , . , .

    42) 3082 . 2007.11.15. 20073061 . , .

  • - 56 -

    1.

    2.

    3.

    3.1. : . : . : . : . : " "

    3.2. . . . . .

    4.

    : ( )

  • - 57 -

    1.

    1985 30 , . , . , , . 2.

    ( ) , - - . . ( ) . .

    3.

    3.1. :

    . :

    ( ) . , , ( ) ( ( ) ( ) .

  • - 58 -

    .

    , , . (1998. 5. 28. 965) , 10 (2004. 6. 24. 200227) . . . , , () . . (incite) . .

    . :

    . . . . ,

  • - 59 -

    .

    . ( ) , ( ) . ( , ). . . , - ( ) - (context) , . .

    . ! ( ) ( ) , ( ) , .

    ( ) . . .

  • - 60 -

    ~ ~ , ( ) .43)

    . . .

    . :

    (imminent) . , (Doctrine of Clear and Present Danger) . (presence) (nowness) . Whitney v. California(274 U.S. 357(1927)) L. Brandeis . Brandenburg v. Ohio(395 U.S. 444(1969)) .

    43) ( 1969. 9. 17 69780 ) . , , . (, 60 10 16, 46() 1799() 1920).

  • - 61 -

    . (advocacy of action) (incitement of action) 44) .

    . , , 45) . - - . . 46) - - . . 47) . , , , , .

    . :

    44) Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357(1927)45) , 30 2 28 .46) (), 60 3 4, 44() 260,, 44() 441, 44

    () 5266, 45() 146, 45() 104747) , 60 10 16, 46() 1799() 1920

  • - 62 -

    . . , ( ) .

    . Brandenburg () .48)

    . ( 2008. 4. 17 2003758), ( 1990. 6. 25. 9011) .

    . , . , .

    , .

    48) , 1987 [62]36 1232 43

  • - 63 -

    . .

    3.2.

    .

    49) , . , . , , .

    , . .

    .

    . . - 7 - ,

    49) . .

  • - 64 -

    .

    . , . , . , , .50)

    . , . . .

    .

    , , , , . , .

    50) ,1990. 4. 2. ,89113; 1990. 6. 25. ,9011; 1992. 1. 28. ,898; 1997. 1. 16. 926 .

  • - 65 -

    .

    , . , . , . . : ( ). . , , . , .

    , , , , , - . , , , .

    .

    , .

  • - 66 -

    , . , . R.O. . , .51) . - - . . .

    , . , . . . , . .

    51) . , ( ) . ( ) , ( leadership) , . . R.O. .

  • - 67 -

    , .52) , (nowness) . . . . .

    53) . , , 3 3 . .

    , . (, ) (, ) (, ) .

    54)

    52) . 53) . 54) .

    , (advocate) (incite) , . . , , , , , ,

  • - 68 -

    , , . . , . .

    .

    , . . . . , .

    . .

    , , , . , .

  • - 69 -

    4.

    . , . , . . - , - . . . - , - .

    . .

    - - . - . .

  • - 70 -

    - - .

    . . . . .

    2014 12

    ()