Upload
others
View
14
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
KARAKTERISASI ALAT UKUR LITERASI SAINTIFIK
KELISTRIKAN MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS PARAMETER
LOGISTIK
TESIS
Diajukan untuk memenuhi sebagian dari syarat memperoleh gelar
Magister Pendidikan Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika
Disusun oleh
Siti Rohmah
NIM 1603268
PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN FISIKA
SEKOLAH PASCASARJANA
UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA
2019
Siti Rohmah, 2019
KARAKTERISASI ALAT UKUR LITERASI SAINTIFIK KELISTRIKAN MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS PARAMETER
LOGISTIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
LEMBAR HAK CIPTA
KARAKTERISASI ALAT UKUR LITERASI SAINTIFIK KELISTRIKAN
MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS PARAMETER LOGISTIK
Oleh
Siti Rohmah
S.Si Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 2015
Sebuah Tesis yang diajukan untuk memenuhi salah satu syarat memperoleh gelar
Magister Pendidikan (M.Pd.) pada Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika
© Siti Rohmah 2019
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Agustus 2019
Hak Cipta dilindungi undang-undang.
Tesis ini tidak boleh diperbanyak seluruhya atau sebagian, dengan dicetak ulang,
difotokopi, atau cara lainnya tanpa ijin dari penulis.
Siti Rohmah, 2019
KARAKTERISASI ALAT UKUR LITERASI SAINTIFIK KELISTRIKAN MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS PARAMETER
LOGISTIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Siti Rohmah, 2019
KARAKTERISASI ALAT UKUR LITERASI SAINTIFIK KELISTRIKAN MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS PARAMETER
LOGISTIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
ABSTRAK
KARAKTERISASI ALAT UKUR LITERASI SAINTIFIK KELISTRIKAN
MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS PARAMETER LOGISTIK
SITI ROHMAH
Email: [email protected]
Penelitian dilakukan untuk mengembangkan alat ukur literasi saintifik siswa pada
materi kelistrikan. Hasil validasi konstruksi butir soal oleh ahli Fisika diperoleh 20
butir soal pilihan ganda dan 12 butir pernyataan angket memenuhi standar Content
Validity Ratio (CVR). Butir soal yang telah memenuhi standar CVR diujikan kepada
315 siswa di 3 SMA di kota Bandung. Hasil karakterisasi butir soal menggunakan
analisis parameter logistik teridentifikasi butir soal memiliki 3 parameter logistik
yaitu: daya pembeda (a), tingkat kesuliyan (b) dan probabilitas tebakan (c).
Perpotongan kurva Fungsi Informasi tes dengan kurva Standard Error
Measurement (SEM) menunjukkan bahwa alat ukur literasi saintifik kelistrikan
paling cocok digunakan kepada siswa pada rentang kemampuan rendah hingga
tinggi.
Kata kunci : Tes literasi saintifik, parameter logistik, kelistrikan
Siti Rohmah, 2019
KARAKTERISASI ALAT UKUR LITERASI SAINTIFIK KELISTRIKAN MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS PARAMETER
LOGISTIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
ABSTRACT
CHARACTERIZATION OF STUDENTS’ ELECTRICITY SAINTIFIC
LITERCY TEST USING PARAMETER LOGISTIC ANALYSIS
SITI ROHMAH
Email: [email protected]
The study was conducted to develop measurement tools to assess students'
scientific literacy on electricity topic. Constuct of items test validated by Physics
experts obtained 20 multiple choice item test and 12 item questionnaire fulfilling
the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) standard. Items with CVR standards were
tested on 315 high school students in 3 high schools in Bandung. The results of
the characterization of the items using logistic parameter analysis identified the
item has 3 parameters logistik, namely: difficulty (a), discrimination (b) and
parameter guessing (c). The intersection of the test Information function curve
and Standard Error Measurment (SEM) function curve shows that the test is
convenient to measure students’ electricity saintific literacy with ability range
from low to high.
Keywords: Scientific literacy test, parameter logistic, electricity
Siti Rohmah, 2019
KARAKTERISASI ALAT UKUR LITERASI SAINTIFIK KELISTRIKAN MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS PARAMETER
LOGISTIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
DAFTAR ISI
halaman
PERNYATAAN ....................................................................................... i
KATA PENGANTAR ............................................................................. ii
UCAPAN TERIMAKASIH ..................................................................... iii
ABSTRAK ............................................................................................... iv
ABSTRACT ............................................................................................. v
DAFTAR ISI ............................................................................................ vi
DAFTAR TABEL .................................................................................... vii
DAFTAR GAMBAR ............................................................................... ix
BAB I PENDAHULUAN
A. Latar Belakang Penelitian ................................................. 1
B. Rumusan Masalah Penelitian ............................................ 8
C. Tujuan Penelitian ............................................................... 8
D. Manfaat Penelitian ............................................................. 9
E. Definisi Operasional ......................................................... 9
F. Struktur Organisasi Tesis .................................................. 12
BAB II KAJIAN TEORI
A. Literasi Saintifik ............................................................... 13
B. Scientific literacy assessment ............................................ 23
C. Teori Respon Butir ............................................................ 26
D. Penelitian yang relevan...................................................... 34
BAB III METODE PENELITIAN
A. Metode Penelitian ............................................................. 38
B. Partisipan dan Tempat Penelitian ..................................... 40
C. Instrumen Penelitian ......................................................... 40
D. Prosedur Penelitian ........................................................... 41
E. Teknik Pengumpulan Data ............................................... 46
BAB IV HASIL PENELITIAN DAN PEMBAHASAN
A. Konstruksi Tes Literasi Saintifik Kelistrikan ................... 52
B. Karakteristik Tes Literasi Saintifik Kelistrikan ................ 59
Siti Rohmah, 2019
KARAKTERISASI ALAT UKUR LITERASI SAINTIFIK KELISTRIKAN MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS PARAMETER
LOGISTIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
BAB IV SIMPULAN, IMPLIKASI DAN REKOMENDASI
A. Simpulan ........................................................................... 65
B. Implikasi ........................................................................... 66
C. Rekomendasi .................................................................... 66
DAFTAR PUSTAKA ............................................................................. 67
LAMPIRAN ............................................................................................ 85
Siti Rohmah, 2019
KARAKTERISASI ALAT UKUR LITERASI SAINTIFIK KELISTRIKAN MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS PARAMETER
LOGISTIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
DAFTAR TABEL
Tabel 2.1 Referensi Pendukung Framework Literasi Saintifik ................... 15
Tabel 2.2 Kemampuan spesifik literasi saintifik ........................................ 16
Tabel 2.3 Contoh soal literasi saintifik – Peranan sains ............................ 17
Tabel 2.4 Contoh soal literasi saintifik – Berpikir dan berperilaku ilmiah 19
Tabel 2.5 Contoh soal literasi saintifik – Sains dalam bermasyarakat ....... 20
Tabel 2.6 Contoh soal literasi saintifik – Matematika dalam sains ........... 22
Tabel 2.7 Contoh soal literasi saintifik – Motivasi dan keyakinan dalam sains ....... 23
Tabel 3.1 Konstruksi matrik scaffolding .................................................... 43
Tabel 3.2 Teknik pengumpulan data .......................................................... 47
Tabel 3.3 Nilai minimum CVR uji satu pihak ........................................... 49
Tabel 3.4 Klasifikasi koefisien reliabilitas ................................................. 49
Tabel 3.5 Kriteria butir soal menggunakan analisis IRT ............................ 50
Tabel 3.6 Kategori persentase .................................................................... 51
Tabel 4.1 Sebaran kisi-kisi butir soal literasi saintifik kelistrikan .............. 53
Tabel 4.2 Kriteria penilaian yang ditelaah ................................................. 53
Tabel 4.3 Kategori dan Indikator literasi saintifik kelistrikan .................... 54
Tabel 4.4 Ketertarikan siswa terhadap tema kelistrikan ............................ 56
Tabel 4.5 Faktor sikap siswa terhadap dimensi sikap literasi saintifik ....... 56
Tabel 4.6 Rekapitulasi sikap siswa terhadap literasi saintifik ..................... 58
Tabel 4.7 Rekapitulasi penyebaran pilihan jawaban .................................. 61
Tabel 4.8 Output analisis kecukupan sampel (20 aitem .............................. 62
Tabel 4.9 Independensi lokal 3 parameter logistik ..................................... 64
Tabel 4.10 Karakteristik butir soal literasi saintifik kelistrikan .................. 65
Tabel 4.11 Rentang tingkat butir soal literasi saintifik kelistrikan ............. 66
Tabel 4.12 Butir soal dengan daya pembeda paling tinggi dan rendah ...... 66
Tabel 4.13 Tingkat kesulitan butir soal literasi saintifik kelistrikan ........... 68
Tabel 4.14 Butir soal tingkat kesukaran paling tinggi dan rendah ............. 69
Tabel 4.15 Butir soal dengan parameter peluang tebakan (c) ..................... 70
Siti Rohmah, 2019
KARAKTERISASI ALAT UKUR LITERASI SAINTIFIK KELISTRIKAN MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS PARAMETER
LOGISTIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
DAFTAR GAMBAR
Gambar 2.1 Grafik fungsi IRT dengan satu parameter logistik ................ 28
Gambar 2.2 penempatan posisi ukuran tingkat kesulitan butir soal .......... 28
Gambar 2.3 Grafik fungsi IRT dengan dua parameter logistik ................. 29
Gambar 2.4 Grafik fungsi IRT dengan tiga parameter logistik ................ 30
Gambar 2.5 Grafik fungsi informasi butir soal dan tes ............................. 31
Gambar 2.6 Fungsi informasi tes dan kesalahan standar pengukuran ........ 33
Gambar 2.7 Fungsi informasi tes dan Standar kesalahan pengukuran 2PL 34
Gambar 3.7 Modifikasi dan adaptasi tahapan R&D Borg & Gall .............. 28
Gambar 4.1 Analisis tingkat kesukaran dan daya pembeda butir soal ....... 60
Gambar 4.2 Scree plot analisis faktor tes literasi saintifik kelistrikan ........ 62
Gambar 4.3 Kurva fungsi informasi parameter logistik IRT ...................... 63
Gambar 4.4 Kurva Informasi dan SEM ...................................................... 72
Siti Rohmah, 2019
KARAKTERISASI ALAT UKUR LITERASI SAINTIFIK KELISTRIKAN MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS PARAMETER
LOGISTIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
DAFTAR LAMPIRAN
Lampiran A.1. Kisi-kisi butir soal literasi sainstifik Kelistrikan ..................... 86
Lampiran A.2. Kuisioner persepsi global literasi saintifik ............................. 105
Lampiran A.3. Jejak rekam pengembangan butir soal literasi saintifik kelistrikan
.................................................................................................. 106
Lampiran A.4. Rekapitulasi Content Validity Ratio ........................................ 125
Lampiran A.5. Rekapitulasi uji coba butir soal literasi saintifik kelistrikan .... 126
Lampiran A.6. Rekapitulasi kuisioner persepsi global literasi saintifik .......... 138
Lampiran A.7. Rekapitulasi ketertarikan tema kelistrikan .............................. 145
Lampiran B.1. Uji classical test theory instrumen literasi saintifik kelistrikan
.................................................................................................. 148
Lampiran B.2. Uji kecukupan sampel Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin ........................... 149
Lampiran B.3. Screeplot dan invariansi eigenvalue ........................................ 150
Lampiran B.4. Matrik koefisien korelasi antar butir soal literasi saintifk ....... 152
Lampiran B.5. Parameter Item Response Theory butir soal literasi saintifik
kelistrikan ................................................................................. 154
Lampiran B.6. Kurve fungsi informasi butir soal literasi saintifik kelistrikan 155
Lampiran B.7. Kurva fungsi karakteristik butir soal literasi saintifik kelistrikan
.................................................................................................. 158
Lampiran B.8. Estimasi variabel laten kemampuan literasi saintifik kelistrikan
.................................................................................................. 161
Lampiran C.1. Surat keterangan pembimbing ................................................. 166
Lampiran C.2. Dokumentasi Penelitian ........................................................... 167
Siti Rohmah, 2019
KARAKTERISASI ALAT UKUR LITERASI SAINTIFIK KELISTRIKAN MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS PARAMETER
LOGISTIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Arif, W., Suhandi, A., Kaniawati, I., & Setiawan, A. (2017). Development
Scaffolding for Construction of Evaluation Instrument Training Program on
the Cognitive Domain for Senior High School Physics Teachers and the Same
Level. Journal Physics Conference, 812(1), 1-6.
Arons, A. B. (1983). Achieving wider scientific literacy. Daedalus, 112(2), 91–122
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Project
2061: Science for all Americans. Diperoleh 1 Desember 2018, dari
http://www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/online/sfaatoc.htm
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993).
Benchmarks for scientific literacy. Project 2061. Diperoleh 1 Desember 2018,
dari: http://www.project2061.org/publications/bsl/online/index.php
Adeleke, A.A. & Joshua E.O. (2015). Development and Validation of Scientific
Literacy Achievement Test to Assess Senior Secondary School Students’
Literacy Acquisition in Physics. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6,
No.7, 28-42.
Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio:
revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation
in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79-86.
Baker, F (2001). The Basics of Item Response Theory. ERIC Clearinghouse on
Assessment and Evaluation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Bøe, M. V. (2012). Science choices in Norwegian upper secondary school: What
matters?. Sci. Ed., 96: 1-20. doi:10.1002/sce.20461
Chalmers, R. (2012). mirt: A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for
the R Environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(6), 1 - 29.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i06
Siti Rohmah, 2019
KARAKTERISASI ALAT UKUR LITERASI SAINTIFIK KELISTRIKAN MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS PARAMETER
LOGISTIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and
contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 582–301.
DeMars, C. (2010). Item response theory. Series in Understanding Statistics.
Oxford University Press, Inc. Madison Avenue, New York
Demirtaşlı, N.Ç. (2002). A study of raven standard progressive matrices test’s item
measures under classical and item response models: An empirical
comparison. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 35 (2),
71-79.
Dillon, J. (2009). On Scientific Literacy and Curriculum Reform. International
Journal of Environmental & Science Education Vol. 4, No. 3, 201-213.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for
improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science
Education, 25, 671–688.
Eccles, J., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual
Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132.
Edelen, M. O. & Reeve, B. B. (2007), Applying Item Response Theory (IRT)
Modeling to Questionnaire Development, Evaluation, and Refinement.
Quality of Life Research, 16, 5–18.
Fives, H. Huebner, W. Birbaum, A. S. & Nicolich, M. (2014), Developing a
Measure of Scientific Literacy for Middle School Students. Sci. Ed., 98: 549-
580.
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012). Developing a Test of Scientific
Literacy Skills (TOSLS): measuring undergraduates' evaluation of scientific
information and arguments. CBE life sciences education, 11(4), 364-77.
Graber, S. (2007). Sputnik and the Dawn of the Space Age. NASA. Online
http://history.nasa.gov/sputnik/ (diakses: 10 November 2018).
Siti Rohmah, 2019
KARAKTERISASI ALAT UKUR LITERASI SAINTIFIK KELISTRIKAN MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS PARAMETER
LOGISTIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Hahn, I. et al. (2013). Assessing scientifi c literacy over the lifespan – A description
of the NEPS science framework and the test development. Journal for
Educational Research Online. Volume 5 (2013), No. 2, 110–138
Hambleton, R. K., & Jones, R. W. (1993). Comparison of classical test theory and
item response theory and their applications to test development. Educational
Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(3), 38-47. doi:10.1111/j.1745-
3992.1993.tb00543.x
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item
response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item Response Theory: Principles
and Applications. USA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
Hardinata, S. Permanasari A. (2017). Development and Validation of a Scientific
Literacy Test on Global Warming Theme. International Conference on
Mathematics and Science Education. Atlantis Press. volume 57.
Hays, R. D., Morales, L. S., and Reise, S. P. (2000), Item Response Theory and
Health Outcomes Measurement in the Twenty-First Century. Medical Care,
38, Suppl. 9, 1128–1142.
Hingorjo, M.R., & Jaleel, F. (2012). Analysis of one-best MCQs: the difficulty
index, discrimination index and distractor efficiency. JPMA. The Journal of
the Pakistan Medical Association, 62 2, 142-7.
Hazen, R. M., & Trefil, J. (1991). Science matters: Achieving scientific literacy.
American Journal of Physics 60, 861 (1992); doi: 10.1119/1.17073.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikemae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy.
International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 275–288.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikemae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for
enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science
Education, 29:11, 1347-1362.
Siti Rohmah, 2019
KARAKTERISASI ALAT UKUR LITERASI SAINTIFIK KELISTRIKAN MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS PARAMETER
LOGISTIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Holman, R., Glas, C. A. W., and de Haan, R. J. (2003), Power Analysis in
Randomized Clinical Trials Based on Item Response Theory. Controlled
Clinical Trials, 24, 390–410.
Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science
Education, 82: 407-416.
Jarman, R., & McClune, B. (2007). Developing scientific literacy: Using news
media in the classroom. Maidenhead, England: McGraw-Hill International.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Desain Induk Gerakan Literasi
Sekolah. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah,
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Koentjaraningrat. (1997). Metode-Metode Penelitian Masyarakat. Jakarta:
PT.Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Laugksch, R. C., & Spargo, P. E. (1996). Construction of a paper-and-pencil test of
basic scientific literacy based on selected literacy goals recommended by the
American Association for the Advancement of Science. Public
Understanding of Science, 5 (4), 331-359.
Lawse, C. H. (1975) A Quantitative Approach To Content Validity. Content
Validity II. A Conference Held at Bowling Green State University, 28, hal
563-575.
Liu, X. (2009). Beyond science literacy: Science and the public. International
Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 301–311.
Lord, F.M. (1980). Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing
Problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review.
Daedalus, 112, 29–48.
Siti Rohmah, 2019
KARAKTERISASI ALAT UKUR LITERASI SAINTIFIK KELISTRIKAN MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS PARAMETER
LOGISTIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Maulana, A. & Suhandi, A. (2017). Effect of levels of inquiry model of science
teaching on scientific literacy domain attitudes. AIP Conference
Proceedings 1848, 050004. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983960
Mun, K. dkk (2015). Korean Secondary Students’ Perception of Scientific Literacy
as Global Citizens: Using Global Scientific Literacy Questionnaire.
International Journal of Science Education, 37:11, 1739-1766.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Apollo 11 Mission
Report. Online: http://www.history.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/A11_PAOMission
Report. (diakses: 10 November 2018).
National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB). (2010). Science framework for
the 2011 National Assessment of Educational Progress. ED 512544.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National Science Education Standards.
Washington, DC: National Academy of Science Press.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education:
Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a conceptual
framework for new K-12 science education standards. Board on Science
Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.
Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (1991). Position statement.
Washington, DC: Author
Norris, S. P & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is
central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87: 224-240.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2007). PISA
2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world, volume I analysis. Paris:
Author.
Siti Rohmah, 2019
KARAKTERISASI ALAT UKUR LITERASI SAINTIFIK KELISTRIKAN MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS PARAMETER
LOGISTIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2016), PISA
2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education, PISA, OECD
Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en.
PERMENDIKBUD Tahun 2016 no. 23 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan.
Partchev, Ivailo. (2004). A visual guide to item response theory. Friedrich-Schiller-
Universit¨at Jena
Purwanto. (2009). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Rakkapao, Suttida., Prasitpong, Singha., Arayathanitkul, Kwan. (2016). Analysis
test of understanding of vectors with the three-parameter logistic model of
item response theory and item response curves technique. Physical Review
Physics Education Research. Volume 12 (2).
Ramalis, T.R, Liliasari. (2015). Karakteristik Pengembangan Tes Literasi Bumi dan
Antariksa Untuk Calon Guru. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 4 (1): 83-91.
Riskawati., Yulianti L., & Latifah, E. (2017). Penguasaan konsep dan literasi sains
siswa dikelas X SMAN Jeneponto. Pros. Seminar Pend. IPA Pascasarjana
UM. Vol. 2, 2017, ISBN: 978-602-9286-22-9
Roberts, D.A. (2007). Scientific literacy/Science literacy. In S.K. Abell & N.G.
Lederman, (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780).
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rohmah, S., I, Kaniawati., Ramalis, T.R. (2018). Analysing PISA-like assessment
test measuring Scientific Literacy using Three-Parameter Logistic (3PL) of
IRT. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Volume 1108.
Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy.
Studies in Science Education, 36:1, 1-44.
Rusilowati, A., Kurniawati, L., Nugroho, S.E. & Widiyatmoko, A. (2016).
Developing an Instrument of Scientific Literacy Asessment on the Cycle
Siti Rohmah, 2019
KARAKTERISASI ALAT UKUR LITERASI SAINTIFIK KELISTRIKAN MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS PARAMETER
LOGISTIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Theme. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education,
11(12), 5718-5727.
Rutherford, F. J. & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all americans. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Sastradika, D., Jumadi (2018). Development of subject-specific pedagogy based on
guided inquiry about newton's law to improve senior high school students'
scientific literacy ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Volume
1097, conference 1
Singh, K., Granville, M & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and Science Achievement:
Effects of Motivation, Interest, and Academic Engagement, The Journal of
Educational Research, 95:6, 323-332.
Sudiatmika, A.A Istri Rai. (2010). Pengembangan alat ukut tes literasi sains siswa
SMP dalam konteks budaya Bali. Disertasi. Universitas Pendidikan
Indonesia.
Suwono, H. (2016). School Literary Movement in Indonesia: Challenges for
Scientific Literacy. International Confrence on Education 2016, 309-317.
Taylor, R. (1990). Interpretation of the Correlation Coefficient: A Basic Review.
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 6(1), 35–39.
Wenning, C.J. (2006). Assessing nature-of-science literacy as one component of
scientific literacy. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 3(4), 3-14.
Wenning, C.J. (2007). Assessing inquiry skills as a component of scientific literacy.
Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, Vol. 4, No. 2. (2007), pp. 21-
24
Wilson, F Robert, Pan, W., & Schumsky, D. A. (2012). Recalculation of the Critical
Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in
Counseling and Development, 45(3), 197–210.
Siti Rohmah, 2019
KARAKTERISASI ALAT UKUR LITERASI SAINTIFIK KELISTRIKAN MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS PARAMETER
LOGISTIK
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Wu M., Tam H.P., Jen TH. (2016) Classical Test Theory. In: Educational
Measurement for Applied Researchers. Springer, Singapore
Yuliati, Lia. Parno. Yogismawati, F & Nisa, I. (2018). Building Scientific Literacy
and Concept Achievement of Physics through Inquiry-Based Learning for
STEM Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.