Kreshen Input Theory

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    1/25

    Krashens Input

    Hypothesis

    NADZIRAH RAZAKNUR ARIF ZAINUDIN

    MAIYHURRI APGUNASEKARAN

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    2/25

    "Language acquisition does not require extensiveuse of conscious grammatical rules, and does not

    require tedious drill." Stephen Krashen

    "Acquisition requires meaningful interaction inthe target language - natural communication - in

    which speakers are concerned not with the formof their utterances but with the messages theyare conveying and understanding." StephenKrashen

    "In the real world, conversations withsympathetic native speakers who are willing tohelp the acquirer understand are very

    helpful."Stephen Krashen

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    3/25

    FiveHypotheses

    Evaluationsof the five

    hypotheses

    OutputHypothesis

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    4/25

    What is input and output?

    (process of understanding

    language)

    listening reading

    (Production)

    speaking writing

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    5/25

    Five Hypotheses

    1. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis

    Two ways (adult)

    Acquisition

    Subconscious

    Learning

    Conscious

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    6/25

    Conscious Subconscious

    learning acquisition

    are NOT able to exist at the same time

    (mutually exclusive)

    Fluency in second language

    performance is due to what we

    have acquired, not what we have

    learned.

    Krashen

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    7/25

    Application for teaching

    According to this theory, the optimalway a language is learned is throughnatural communication. As a second

    language teacher, the ideal is tocreate a situation wherein languageis used in order to fulfill authentic

    purposes. This is turn, will helpstudents to acquire the languageinstead of just learning it.

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    8/25

    2. Monitor Hypothesis

    Only involved in learning, x acquisition

    Device for editing & making corrections

    Krashen, such explicit intentionallylearning should be avoided.

    Should only be applied afterfluency is established

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    9/25

    Application for teaching

    As an SL teacher it will always be achallenge to strike a balancebetween encouraging accuracy and

    fluency in your students. Thisbalance will depend on numerousvariables including the languagelevel of the students, the context of

    language use and the personal goalsof each student. This balance is alsoknown as Communicative

    competency.

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    10/25

    Application for teaching

    As an SL teacher it will always be achallenge to strike a balancebetween encouraging accuracy and

    fluency in your students. Thisbalance will depend on numerousvariables including the languagelevel of the students, the context of

    language use and the personal goalsof each student. This balance is alsoknown as Communicative

    competency.

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    11/25

    3. Natural Order Hypothesis

    By following the earlier morpheme

    order studies of Dulay and Burt

    Krashen claimed that:

    we acquire language in a predictableor natural order

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    12/25

    Application for teaching

    According to this hypothesis, teachersshould be aware that certain structures ofa language are easier to acquire thanothers and therefore language structures

    should be taught in an order that isconducive to learning. Teachers shouldstart by introducing language conceptsthat are relatively easy for learners toacquire and then use scaffolding tointroduce more difficult concepts.

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    13/25

    4. Input Hypothesis

    Krashen:Comprehensible the only true foundation

    input = of SLA

    Comprehensive input: understanding ofinput language, that contains a bit beyondthe current level of competence. (i + 1)

    Speech will emerge once acquirer has builtup enough comprehensible input

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    14/25

    Application for teaching

    This hypothesis highlights the importanceof using the Target Language in theclassroom. The goal of any language

    program is for learners to be able tocommunicate effectively. By providing asmuch comprehensible input as possible,especially in situations when learners are

    not exposed to the TL outside of theclassroom, the teacher is able to create amore effective opportunity for languageacquisition.

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    15/25

    5. Affective Filter Hypothesis

    Krashen: the best acquisition will

    occur when we have low anxiety

    and defensive-free

    low affective filter

    (in Krashens terms)

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    16/25

    Appliccation for teaching

    In any aspect of education it is alwaysimportant to create a safe, welcomingenvironment in which students can learn.

    In language education this may beespecially important since in order to takein and produce language, learners need tofeel that they are able to make mistakes

    and take risks. This relates to directly toKrashens hypothesis of the affective filter.

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    17/25

    6. the Reading Hypothesis

    This hypothesis basically states thatthe more we read in a SL the greaterour vocabulary will be.

    Application for teaching :

    It is important to involve reading inthe language classroom to increaseknowledge of the language and theway it is used in real-life contexts.

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    18/25

    Evaluations of the five hypotheses

    1st criticism:

    Krashen

    Rather fuzzy

    distinction betweensubconscious(acquisition) andconscious (learning)

    McLaughlin (psychologist)

    it is difficult for us to

    identify the consciousor subconsciousdistinctions, inlanguage acquistion.

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    19/25

    Evaluations of the five hypotheses

    2nd criticism:

    Krashen

    Learning is not as

    important asacquisition

    Gregg

    Learning & acquisition

    can both be beneficial

    depends on thelearners own

    styles and strategies

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    20/25

    Evaluations of the five hypotheses

    3rd criticism:

    Krashen

    Claimed that the

    input oneunderstands MUSTcontains i + 1, that isthe comprehensive

    input

    Gregg & White

    We are unable to

    define i and 1

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    21/25

    Evaluations of the five hypotheses

    4th criticism:

    Krashen

    Speech will emerge

    once acquirer has

    built up enoughcomprehensible

    input

    Criticism

    Speech will indeed

    emerge for brightlearners

    BUT no significantinformation on

    Krashens theoriesabout learners whosespeech does notemerge

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    22/25

    The Output Hypothesis

    Introduced by Merill Swain (1985)

    Output important role in SLA

    She denied Krashens claims a person couldlearn second language without speaking at all.

    Her studies in Canada :

    English-speakingstudents learn

    all subjectsin French

    but not havingto reply in

    French

    did notachieve fullproductivecompetencein French

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    23/25

    Three major functions of Output in SLA

    1. Get learners to recognize their

    linguistic weaknesses

    2. A way to try out / test ones language

    3. For the learner to

    think deeper on language

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    24/25

    Conclusion

    Related to CALL

    It includes inputand output

    4 skills

    Our Groups View

    Input go hand inhand with output

    They achieve themost efficiencywhen both of themwork together

  • 7/27/2019 Kreshen Input Theory

    25/25

    Source: Brown, H. Douglas. 2007. Principles ofLanguage Learning and Teaching, 5th Edition.White Plains, NY: Pearson Education. Chapter 10