Lap Ghep Xe Robot

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Lap Ghep Xe Robot

    1/13

    Home Articles and resources Forums Visitor contributions Contact

    Username: Password: Remember megfedcb Login

    Home Robot navigation

    Small Robot Drive TrainsBy Ibrahim Kamal

    Last update: 4/4/08

    1-Traction and steering mechanisms There are many types of mechanisms that have been developed to move a robot from a place to

    another, more than you could imagine, however, we will only study some of those techniques

    which are the most adequate to relatively small robots:

    1.1- Differential Drive system: This is the most common locomotion scheme in the world of

    robotics. It's easy to build, easy to control and can permit the robot to move in all requireddirections. In that system, two motors are connected, one to each of the two drive wheels at the

    right and at the left of the robot's base. Those two motors are responsible of driving the

    Table of content:

    Overview

    Traction and steering mechanisms

    Mounting the motors

    Transmitting power to the wheels

    Diameter of the wheels, speed and torque

    Mass distribution and robot stability

    Acquiring small motors and Building materials

    Join the Mailing List

    Let us get in touch with you when we

    upload new interesting content.

    Subscribe UnsubscribeGet your Free Mailing List

    by Bravenet.com

    Name:

    Email:

    nmlkji nmlkj GO

    Overview

    This Tutorial Aims to introduce to beginner thedifferent techniques used to build the chassisand drive trains of relatively small robots.W h a t I m e an b y sm a l l r o b o t s , i s t h e c a t e g o r y o f l ig h t

    w e ig h t r o b o t s w h e r e a s p e c t s l i k e a er o d y n am i c s a n d

    v i b r a t i on d am p i n g a r e n o t t a k e n i n a c co u n t .

    Most of the fundamental theory remain the same for all

    sizes of robots, Theory such as robot stability, traction

    and steering techniques. However, This tutorial is

    dedicated tothe construction of relatively small robots,explaining how to the implement your designs using

    material and equipment at the reach of any average level

    hobbyist.

    /www.ikalogic.com/tut_mech_1.php

    http://www.ikalogic.com/index.phphttp://www.ikalogic.com/cat_robot_navigation.phphttp://www.ikalogic.com/tut_mech_1.php#2http://www.ikalogic.com/tut_mech_1.php#3http://www.ikalogic.com/tut_mech_1.php#4http://www.ikalogic.com/tut_mech_1.php#6http://www.ikalogic.com/tut_mech_1.phphttp://www.ikalogic.com/tut_mech_1.phphttp://www.bravenet.com/http://www.bravenet.com/webtools/elist/http://www.ikalogic.com/tut_mech_1.php#imaginehttp://www.ikalogic.com/tut_mech_1.php#7http://www.ikalogic.com/tut_mech_1.php#6http://www.ikalogic.com/tut_mech_1.php#5http://www.ikalogic.com/tut_mech_1.php#4http://www.ikalogic.com/tut_mech_1.php#3http://www.ikalogic.com/tut_mech_1.php#2http://www.ikalogic.com/tut_mech_1.php#1http://www.ikalogic.com/cat_robot_navigation.phphttp://www.ikalogic.com/index.phphttp://www.ikalogic.com/contact.phphttp://www.ikalogic.com/user_cont.phphttp://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/http://www.ikalogic.com/categories.phphttp://www.ikalogic.com/index.php
  • 8/13/2019 Lap Ghep Xe Robot

    2/13

    As you can also notice in the figure 1.A, this system needs one or more caster wheels (also called

    free-wheels) to support the rest of the chassis while freely following the movement of the robot

    engaged by the two main drive wheels. Some robots use 2 caster wheels, adjacent to the drivewheels for better stability, but again, in the category of small robots, one caster wheel can be

    enough.

    in a horizontal position. This technique becomes interesting when used for lightweight robots,

    where caster wheels can cause even more friction than the skids, and add additional and

    unnecessary weight to the robot.

    You can also notice in the figure 1B that the rear skid is not touching the ground, and thus is nota primary skid, but rather a secondary one just in case the robot pivots around the drive wheels

    to the back during a sudden acceleration for example.

    1.2- Four wheel differential drive system:

    robot back and forth as well as steering in

    any required direction. This system can

    even allow a robot to pivot in its place.

    The word "differential" comes from the fact

    that this system relies on the velocity

    difference between the two wheels to drive

    the robot in the required path and make it

    move in any required curve.

    Figure 1A shows in a simplified way the

    principle of operation of differential drive.

    When the left and right motors are turningat the same speed, the robot moves

    forward or backward in a straight line. In

    order to turn right for example, the right

    motor is slowed down and the whole robot

    steers to the right. The bigger the

    difference of speed between the two

    wheels, the tighter will be the steering

    curve. F i g u r e 1 . A : D i f f e r e n t i a l d r i v e s y s t em

    Many roboticists

    even replace this

    single freewheel with

    a piece of bent metal

    or any other low

    friction surface to

    act as skid that slips

    on the ground under

    the action of the

    driving wheels.

    Figure 1B shows the

    chassis of one of our

    line follower robots

    where skids are used

    along with the drive

    wheels to support itF i g u r e 1 . B : Sk i d s u s e d o n a d i f f e r e n t i a l d r i v e t r a i n

  • 8/13/2019 Lap Ghep Xe Robot

    3/13

    friction, it requires relatively powerful motors, as compared to the previous differential drive

    scheme. The advantage of this system is that it is very easy to build and is most suitable for

    running on low friction and dusty surfaces where other drive systems would suffer.

    1.3- Car-type drive system: This drive system has many names, but calling it "car-type" make it

    clear to any reader, that it consists of 2 wheels coupled on the same axe at the back and one or

    two wheels capable of steering to control the displacement of the robot. While this technique is

    very difficult to implement mechanically, it provides two major advantages over other tractionsystems: Ease of control and accuracy (because traction and steering are connected to two

    independent motors). The best way to build your first 'car-type' drive train is to look at any old RC

    toy car. You can also use some parts of it's drive train to build your own, or even use the

    allowing the green axe (in the figure) linking the two front wheels together to move freely along

    the axis of the chassis.

    There can be many other configurations based on the same idea, like a 2 wheel traction / 1 wheel

    steering drive train, which may be a little simpler to construct because the front wheel can be

    directly connected to a gearhead DC motor.

    1.4- Divided chassis drive train:This is another locomotion scheme that we experienced, which has the advantage of being very

    powerful and highly configurable. Inneed, this system relies on 4 independent motors, each one

    coupled to one of the four wheels, allowing the robot to move forward or backward with the

    Another variation of the differential drive system, is the 4

    wheel differential drive system, which resembles the drive

    trains of tanks and bulldozers.

    As figure 1c shows, it consists of only two motors and 4

    wheels. Each pair of wheels are mechanically connected

    together, usually by the mean of a belt forcing them to

    move together, driven by a single motor.

    The behavior of this drive train is similar to the previous

    differential drive system; If the the two motors turn at the

    same speed, the robot moves forward or backward, if there

    is a difference between the speed of the two motors, the

    robot will steer in the direction of the slower motor.

    This drive system implicates a great deal of friction,

    specially during steering, and thus, to overcome this F i g u r e 1 . C: 4 w h e e l d i f f e r e n t i a l d r i v e s y s t em

    chassis of a brand-new RC toy car

    for your robot, as we did in the

    WFR project. Figure 1.D shows a

    simplified layout showing the

    principle of operation this drive

    system. Connecting the front

    (steering) wheels to the motor can

    be very complicated, but a basic

    rack and pinion arrangement can be

    enough for very low steering angles,

    otherwise, for relatively high

    steering angles, the rack and pinion

    arrangement will have to be

    enhanced with a sliding mechanism F i g u r e 1 . D : B a s i c c a r - t y p e d r i v e t r a i n

    http://www.ikalogic.com/wfr2.php
  • 8/13/2019 Lap Ghep Xe Robot

    4/13

    the two rear motors are used either to push it or to bend the chassis (like a toy train) to turn

    right or left by running one of the two motors faster than the other.

    One last special feature of this system is that it has no head nor tail, in other words, there is no

    difference between the front part of the chassis and the rear one, making it possible for the robot

    to change it's direction, to adapt to any situation, without having to execute a 180 degrees

    rotation.

    2-Mounting the MotorsWhen you are settled on a traction and steering mechanism for your robot, you have to find a way

    of fixing the motors firmly to the chassis. At this point, in order to construct a professional drive

    train, you have to take those points in consideration:

    You have to be able to mount and dismount the motor easily. Gluing, soldering and other

    permanent fixing solutions are not good ones. As a roboticist, building a prototype, You have to

    able the make any modifications easily.

    The outer shell of a motor is not designed to bear high, undistributed stresses. whatever the

    method you are using to mount and hold your motors in place, you have to increase the contact

    area between the motor's body and the mechanical part linking it to the chassis to prevent stress

    concentration and eventually damaging the motor.

    There are many items that you can buy at your nearest hardware store, to use it to mount themotor on the chassis, I present some ideas that I find to be the most adequate to this category

    of robots.

    2.1- Pipe Clamps:

    accumulated power of four motors

    or to turn right and left with

    approximately equivalent power, but

    with minimum frictional losses.

    Figure 1.E shows how to implement

    such a configuration, and shows

    how the the chassis is divided into

    two parts, hinged together, allowing

    it to change it's shape to turn in

    tight curves.

    Usually, the two front motors areused only to drag the robot, while F i g u r e 1 . E: P i ct u r e a n d l a y o u t o f t h e d i v i d e d c h a s s i s

    Because they come in any size you want, because they

    are cheap, and because it can be used with any motor,

    this is my favorite choice. Initially, at the name implies,

    pipe clamps are used to fix water pipes on walls. Due to

    the resemblance of size and shape between the outer

    shell of a standard DC motor and water pipes, those

    clamps are very adequate to the job of holding motors

    firmly in place, while distributing any eventual stress along

    the whole contact surface.

    Figure 2.A shows a standard pipe clamp, where the right

    bolt was replaced with a longer 4mm screw, to be used

    later to fix the motor-clamp assembly to the chassis. Note

    F i g u r e 2 . A : P i p e c lam p

  • 8/13/2019 Lap Ghep Xe Robot

    5/13

    2.2-U-bolts:

    2.3- Building your own bracket:

    If your motor is too small, too big or just not adequate to any of the previous solutions, building

    your own bracket to hold your motor is not that difficult. You have to use your imagination, and

    cope with the components, tools and materials that are at your reach. At this point i'll only give

    you hints of materials you could use to easily attach your motors.

    that there are many varieties of pipe clamps, so it's up to

    you to pay a visit to your hardware store and find the one

    that would be the most suitable according to your design.

    Most Pipe clamps come with a nut welded to it, allowing

    easier fixation to any adjacent plan (that plan can be a

    wall as it can be the chassis of your robot).

    Figure 2.B shows how a motor fits in that pipe clamp.

    Adding small parts of rubber between the surfaces of the

    motor and the clamp can be a good idea, as it will absorb

    any eventual vibration, and protect the motor's body.

    Figure 2.C shows how a pipe clamp can be used to mountthe motor on the chassis. As you can notice, one of the

    main advantages of using a pipe clamp, is that you can

    easily adjust the distance between the motor and the

    base of the robot to which the motor is fixed, which is not

    the case with other solutions, like the U-Bolt idea..

    F i g u r e 2 . B : DC m o t o r & pipe clamp

    F ig u r e 2 . C

    If for any reason the pipe clamp solution cannot be used,

    this is the second best choice. I've never used thistechnique to fix motors, but i've seen it used by many

    hobbyists. The two reasons making this technique less

    effective that pipe clamps are:

    1- The contact area is relatively small, thus stress

    concentration can be a problem. This problem can be

    solved by using more than one U-bolt for each motor.

    2- The U-bolt is designed to hold a circular object by

    pushing it against a fixed surface. As figure 2.E shows, in

    our application, the circular object is the motor and the

    fixed surface is the chassis. so the height of the motor

    from the ground depends on the height of the part of the

    chassis where the motor is fixed. In contrast, with Pipe

    clamps, you can easily adjust the distance between the

    chassis and the motor.

    Figure 2.D: U-BoltPicture from: http://www.gibsonstainless.com/

    Figure 2.E: U-Bolt on a motor

    - A rubber band (figure 2.F) can hold your motor in place

    exactly like a U-Bolt, while giving it some elasticity to

    absorb shocks and vibrations. You can obtain really strong

    rubber belts from old cassette players.

    Figure 2.F

    - Thick copper wire can also be used instead of the U-

    bolt, although it has the major disadvantage of being a

    permanent solution, any modification will be destructive and

    new wires will have to be installed. Figure 2.G shows actual

    pictures of DC motors that's I've mounted on one of my firstrobots.

    http://www.gibsonstainless.com/
  • 8/13/2019 Lap Ghep Xe Robot

    6/13

    - Metal sheets formingis the best alternative to U-Bolts and pipe clamps if you have the tools,

    skill, and material to do the job. Then you can form the exact required shape to firmly hold your

    motor in place. I personally recommend Aluminum as a working material. It's corrosion resistance,

    it's light weight and it's machinability, make it a perfect match for small robots.

    3-Transmitting power to the wheels There are many way of transmitting the power from the motor's shaft to the wheels, but in any

    case, friction is your biggest enemy. The frictional losses increase when the weight of the robot

    increases, specially if you're not using any ball bearings to support the shaft, which is usually thecase in small robots. I am going to categorize the various techniques used for power transmission

    into two main categories: Direct transmission and Un direct transmission.

    3.1 -Direct transmission

    3.1.1- Direct transmission from a DC Motor, Which is when the wheels are directly mounted on

    the motor's shafts. This technique is only acceptable when working with very light weight robots,

    otherwise, those relatively small DC motors are not mechanically designed to bear any bending

    stresses that could be caused by directly mounting a wheel on it. Usually the internal

    3.1.2- Direct transmission from a gearhead DC motor is the most common method used by

    roboticists, specially for the category of robot we are talking about. That's because the output

    Figure 2.G

    - Plastic strap fastener, is still a permanent solution, but

    has the advantage of providing a strong attachment, while

    being easily introduced and fastened in small places where

    it would be harder to install copper wires or rubber bands.

    Figure 2.H

    bearing of those motors are designed to withstand the

    stresses required to keep a gear in place in a gearbox,

    or to withstand the tension in a rubber belt. In Mostcases, directly mounting the output shaft of a DC motor

    to a wheel is rarely the best choice because without

    any speed reduction, the developed torque wont be

    enough to easily move a robot around. Figure 3.1.1

    shows an example of how a small plastic wheel can be

    mounted to the tiny shaft of small motors. As you can

    see this is the same idea used in most toy cars, where

    parts are simply forced in their place. This is more

    interesting than more advanced shaft coupling

    techniques when you're working with tiny motors,

    because it would be very difficult to drill it's output

    shaft to install setscrews or pins.Figure 3.1.1

  • 8/13/2019 Lap Ghep Xe Robot

    7/13

    3.2-Undirect transmission

    Undirect transmission means that the shaft holding the wheels is on a totally different plane than

    the output shaft of the motor. Usually, between those two shaft is a reduction belt/gears

    arrangement. Undirect transmission is more suited to heavy robots, where rolling bearings are

    installed to support the shaft holding the wheels, to minimize any frictional losses due to the

    technique on one of our early robots, where each wheel is mounted to a 6mm steel shaft,

    supported at both ends with rolling bearings. There is no obligation to put the rolling bearing at

    both sides of the wheel (the two rolling bearing can be placed at the same side of the wheel as in

    figure 3.2A) but you have to put two of them, each one as distant from the other as possible, to

    reduce shear stresses on the rolling bearings. (rolling bearings are designed to withstand very high

    radialstresses). While you're looking at the pictures, you can notice how the motors are mounted

    with i e clam s as ex lained before.

    shaft from the gearbox of a gearhead motor are

    designed withstand higher stresses than the output

    shaft of the motor itself and has a very suitable output

    characteristics (low RPM and high toque). That can be

    noticed from the shape of the output shaft of a

    gearhead DC motor in the figures 3.1.2A and 3.1.2B,

    which is not fully circular to be able to firmly secure it

    to a shaft coupling or to a wheel in our case.

    There are many ways to fix a wheel to the output shaft

    of a gearhead DC motor, one of the simplest ways is to

    drill a hole in the body of the wheel, of the exact

    diameter of the screw to be used. Forcing the screw inthe drilled material for the first time will form a helixmating the thread of your screw, allowing you to fasted

    the shaft in its place by simply driving the screw.

    If the wheel you are using doesn't have an extended

    shaft as shown in figure 3.1.2A, you will have to find

    another mean of fastening the motor's shaft to the

    wheel, but virtually any wheel you will find is designed

    to be mounted on a shaft, so using your imagination,

    you'll end up finding a solution to that problem,

    depending on the shape and size of the wheel.

    Figure 3.1.2B shows the output shaft of an old PITMAN

    GearHead DC motor.

    Figure 3.1.2 A

    Figure 3.1.2 B

    weight of the robot. Mechanically speaking, any wheel is to be

    fixed with rolling bearings, so this is the best method of all, but

    again, you have to remember that there are some compromises

    that can be made with small robots, to reduce cost, weight and

    complexity.

    Figure 3.2A shows a classic undirect transmission system,

    where the rotation of the motor's shaft is transmitted through a

    reduction pulley arrangement, lowering the RPM of the wheel,

    while increasing the torque. Notice how the the full weight of

    the robots is distributed only on the two rolling bearings, makingthis drive train much more robust than other where the wheels

    are directly mounted on the motors.

    Figure 3.2B and 3.2C shows a practical implementation of this Figure 3.2A

  • 8/13/2019 Lap Ghep Xe Robot

    8/13

    4-Diameter of the wheels, speed and torque With a constant output RPM from a motor, The diameter of the wheel is the last criteria that can

    affect the the balance between the torque of the robot and it's linear velocity.

    Consider the wheel in figure 4, having a radius rturning with a constant angular velocity (RPM) wwww,

    Pa point on the circumference of the wheel, Tthe torque developed from the motor acting on the

    ground plane and F the reaction force of the ground on the wheel.

    that increasing the radius of the wheel will increase the velocity of the robot, but also increase

    the resisting torque that the robot have to overcome. Thus, varying the radius of the wheel, you

    can make a compromise between linear velocity and torque of the robot.

    5-Mass distribution, Moment of Inertia and robot stability One of the most important phenomenon that can affect the behavior of moving robots is the

    moment of inertia. The moment of inertia, which is different for each shape, size, weight and

    trajectory of a moving rigid body, is the ability of that rigid body to resist a change in its

    velocity. The force developed by the moment of inertia appears at the center of gravity of the

    body, and acts as a mechanical moment around the pivot point of the robot (usually a wheel) in

    the a direction opposing the change of velocity.

    In order to better understand the effect of mass distribution on the moment of inertia and

    consequently on the stability of a moving robot, let's imagine this scenario where a simple robot

    (as shown in figure 5.A) is moving at a constant velocity in the horizontal direction. Recalling the

    secondlaw of Newton, and noting that theacceleration of the robot equals zero,

    Figure 3.2B Figure 3.2C

    Let Tfbe the torque developed by the ground as reaction

    to the wheel's movement. This is the torque resisting the

    robot's movement. For the robot to move from rest (or to

    accelerate), Tmust be bigger than Tf.

    The toque Tf = F.r.......(1)

    Also note the that the linear velocity of the robot equals

    the linear velocity of any given point on the outer

    circumference of the wheel,

    Then the velocity V = wwww.r.......(2)

    From the relations (1) and (2), you can easily deduce Figure 4

  • 8/13/2019 Lap Ghep Xe Robot

    9/13

    of inertial depends on the rate of change of velocity (the acceleration). You can greatly decrease

    the effect of inertia by controlling the acceleration and deceleration of your robot, through

    ingenious speed control algorithms

    6-Finding motors and building material

    The easiest way to acquire all the material and equipment you need to build a robot, is to buy it!But that's not the cheapest way, and sometimes you won't find all what you need in the stores.

    That's why - if you plan to dig your way in the field of robotics - you should start collecting all

    the force F1 moving the robot forward

    equals the resistance force R1 (which is the

    sum of all mechanical friction losses in the

    system). The stability problem will start to

    appear when this moving robot will suddenly

    stop.

    In that situation, there is a change of

    velocity, a deceleration or a negative

    acceleration as some books states and the

    moment of inertia of the robot will resist this

    change of velocity, by generating a force

    acting in the previous direction of motion,tryingto keep the robot moving in the same

    direction, with the same velocity.

    In figure 5.B, the effect of the moment of

    inertia is somehow exaggerated to clearly

    show the unstability that can be caused by

    this problem. To solve this problem, and

    design robots that have very low inertia,

    you have to understand those two main

    factors that affect the inertia of a body:

    A- The position of center of gravity has tobe as near as possible from the ground or

    from the eventual pivot point (which are the

    wheels in case of our example robot). This is

    verified by the mathematical relation that

    state that:

    I = m.(r^2)

    Where I is the moment of inertia, m the

    mass of the body, r the distance between

    the center of mass of the body and the

    pivot point

    To change the position of the center of

    mass of your robot, you have to lower the

    position of the heavy parts of the robots like

    the batteries and the motors.

    You also have to design the chassis to be as

    near as possible from the ground (as shown

    in figure 5.C). If all that is not enough, or if

    the chassis simply isn't heavy enough, it's

    common practice to add additional weights

    as near as possible from the ground with the

    sole purpose of lowering the overall centerof mass of the robot.

    B-The torque developed by the moment

    F i g u r e 5 . A

    F i g u r e 5 . B

    F ig u r e 5 . C

  • 8/13/2019 Lap Ghep Xe Robot

    10/13

    kind of devices from which you can scavenge all kind and sizes of DC motor, mechanical parts,

    gears, pulleys, etc.

    From my experience, I tried to classify the kind of devices from which you could extract useful

    items, at least, this is what I do with those devices before throwing them away.

    Old cassette players and walkmans: Small Motors, pulleys, belts, gears.

    Old Floppy disk and CD-ROM drives: Very small motors, worm gear, sliding mechanism, gears, limit

    switches

    Old Photocopier machines, printers and scanners: quality Gearhead DC motors, sliding mechanisms,

    rubber wheels, gears.

    As for the chassis, it can be built with a multitude of materials. My preferred material is Copper

    boards (made for PCBs) as you can solder many metals to it like screws and nuts, you can also

    design the main board of the robot on the same board to reduce size, weight and cost.

    My second best choice is the Fiberglass. It can be easily formed with a a cutter, can be easily

    drilled, can sustain high stresses, and looks very neat an professional.

    Another good choice for building the chassis of the robot is the 3mm Medium Density fibers (MDF

    wood) which has the advantage of being very cheap, and can be very easily cut, drilled and

    grinded to any shape you want. The only disadvantage of this material is that it can easily

    deteriorate with water or even too high humidity.

    Those were the material I found to be more suitable for this category of robots.

    Discussion (Last 15 posts preview...)Preview of the last 15 messages discussing this page. Messages are sorted from the newest to the oldest.

    Follow this discussion in the Full-featured forum

    Posted by:

    demonhackeron: 10 Jun 2009

    Re: Small Robot Drive Trains ['Quote]

    Q u o t i n g i k a l o g i c :

    buddy your question is irrelevant.please elaborate your query so that the other person getsthe clear idea of your concern.

    Q u o t e : sir , i am verythankful for all this guidance but i want to know that howaerodynamics is used to make robotics?

    Posted by:

    ikalogicon: 07 Oct 2008

    Re: Small Robot Drive Trains ['Quote]

    Search on e-bay for modeling and hobby wheels, you should find what you

    need

    small advice from a mechatronics engineer: start by chosing your motors,

    and depending on their couple, chose the biggest possible diameter for the

    wheels, that will still be small enough to deliver enough couple to move your

    robot around all those terrains...

    Q u o t in g a b h i g em _ 1 2 6 : hey, i am building a differential drive that can move on all kind ofterrains, namely sand, peebles, greasy path, water ditch, bumper... etc. can u guys help me

    with what kind of wheels to use??? what kinda grip to use???

    Posted by:

    abhigem_126on: 07 Oct2008

    Small Robot Drive Trains ['Quote]

    hey, i am building a differential drive that canmove on all kind of terrains,

    namely sand, peebles, greasy path, water ditch, bumper... etc. can u guys

    http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&start=0&t=31#p3029http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=31http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=31http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=31http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=4033http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&start=0&t=31#p1813http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/posting.php?mode=quote&f=16&p=1813http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/posting.php?mode=quote&f=16&p=1813http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&start=0&t=31#p1813http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=4033http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/posting.php?mode=quote&f=16&p=1814http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&start=0&t=31#p1814http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/posting.php?mode=quote&f=16&p=3029http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&start=0&t=31#p3029http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=13045http://www.ikalogic.com/tut_mech_1.php#mini_forumhttp://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=31http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=31
  • 8/13/2019 Lap Ghep Xe Robot

    11/13

    help me with what kind of wheels to use??? what kinda grip to use???

    Posted by:

    ikalogicon: 19 Aug 2008

    Re: Small Robot Drive Trains ['Quote]

    I could, but the first thing you have to know is that it would be big mistake

    to put all that weight on the robot. you have to keep all the batteries,

    motors, and electronics on the fixed base, and use wire systems to transmit

    the mechanical power to the different parts of the ARM...

    Q u o t i n g g y a a n g u r u : hellowe are working on a project in which we trying to make a robotic arm on a moving base. .since we are all electrical students we are having a bit of difficulty in designing base andfinding motors. the total weight of the arm + batteries (lead acid) +electronics = 7 kg .could you please tell me the type of motor required in terms of torque. how do we calculatethe torque requirements in general. preferably a speed of 0.6m/s (2 ft/sec) is required.could to teach us how to go about these calculationsthank u

    Posted by:

    gyaanguruon: 18 Aug 2008

    Small Robot Drive Trains ['Quote]

    hello

    we are working on a project in which we trying to make a robotic arm on a

    moving base. . since we are all electrical students we are having a bit of

    difficulty in designing base and finding motors. the total weight of the arm +

    batteries (lead acid) +electronics = 7 kg .could you please tell me the type of motor required in terms of torque. how

    do we calculate the torque requirements in general. preferably a speed of

    0.6m/s (2 ft/sec) is required.

    could to teach us how to go about these calculations

    thank u

    Posted by:

    ikalogicon: 23 May 2008

    Re: Small Robot Drive Trains ['Quote]

    15cm is more than enough, and with that size of robots, you can use the

    PCB material for the chassis, as in our mini line follower robot project. I

    think it is the most suitable for that size

    Q u o t i n g s a if : about 15cm dia... v had decided on 20cm but since most of the collegecompetitions here in bangalore(india) fix the maze width at abt 20-25cm max.. nd aso theyfix a max limit to ur chassis width as sumthin lik 20cm.. so that is it-15 cm... u think its too

    less?

    Posted by:

    saifon: 23 May 2008

    Re: Small Robot Drive Trains ['Quote]

    about 15cm dia... v had decided on 20cm but since most of the college

    competitions here in bangalore(india) fix the maze width at abt 20-25cm

    max.. nd aso they fix a max limit to ur chassis width as sumthin lik 20cm..

    so that is it-15 cm... u think its too less?

    Posted by:

    ikalogicon: 22 May 2008

    Re: Small Robot Drive Trains ['Quote]

    circuilar is ok, but, as fr the material of the chassis, i can't tell you unless

    you tell me, what is the size of your robot?

    same thing for the battery.

    Q u o t i n g s a if : salam... hey vr actually designing a chassis which v decided to be cicular withjust 2 wheels ndpassive skids.. is a circular chassis ok wid u? v decided on it coz it canrotate freely in any direction easily... even a 360 turn... nd wot material do u recommend 4the chassis? it shud be light as well as sturdy..nd do u recommend a lead acid or nicad battery?

    http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&start=0&t=31#p887http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/posting.php?mode=quote&f=16&p=887http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&start=0&t=31#p876http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/posting.php?mode=quote&f=16&p=876http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/posting.php?mode=quote&f=16&p=876http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&start=0&t=31#p876http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/posting.php?mode=quote&f=16&p=884http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&start=0&t=31#p884http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1336http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/posting.php?mode=quote&f=16&p=887http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&start=0&t=31#p887http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/posting.php?mode=quote&f=16&p=1508http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&start=0&t=31#p1508http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2879http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/posting.php?mode=quote&f=16&p=1513http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&start=0&t=31#p1513http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2
  • 8/13/2019 Lap Ghep Xe Robot

    12/13

    so, what's the size of your robot?

    Posted by:

    saifon: 22 May 2008

    Small Robot Drive Trains ['Quote]

    salam... hey vr actually designing a chassis which v decided to be cicular

    with just 2 wheels nd passive skids.. is a circular chassis ok wid u? v

    decided on it coz it can rotate freely in any direction easily... even a 360

    turn... nd wot material do u recommend 4 the chassis? it shud be light as

    well as sturdy..

    nd do u recommend a lead acid or nicad battery?

    Posted by:

    ikalogicon: 28 Feb 2008

    Re: Small Robot Drive Trains ['Quote]

    Good question!

    You can either do it the easy way, which is to use 'skids' that will act just

    as a wheel but with more friction..

    Or you can do it the hard way, wich is to build a robot with only 2 weels in

    the midle, and to constantly accelerate and decelerate the wheels, acting

    on the momentof intertia of the robot to stabiliseit.. or maybe you have tohave a mean of changing the center of gravity of the robot to give it the

    ability to balance itself horrisontally.. there lot of ongoing researches about

    this subject.. you may find some information on wikipedia..

    hope this answers your question.

    Q u o t e : how can we construct a small robort which has only 2 wheels and can turn and movein any direction

    Posted by:

    ikalogicon: 28 Feb 2008

    Re: Small Robot Drive Trains ['Quote]

    Well, unless you wroking with robots that go in the air on in the sea, or

    that are very fast, aerodynamics usually is not a big concern. I honnestly

    don't have a lot of experience in this field so i can't give you more

    information.

    good luck

    Q u o t e : sir , i am very thankful for all this guidance but i want to know that how aerodynamicsis used to make robotics?

    Posted by:

    ikalogicon: 28 Feb 2008

    Small Robot Drive Trains ['Quote]

    discussion for the page: [link]

    Gearhead DC motors (which are normal brushed DC motors, with a gearbox

    attached to it's output shaft, to decrease speed and increase torque)

    Q u o t e : sir i have gone through the site,i want to know which motor is prefered for the betterefficiency of the robots.(what type it is?)

    You have to be a member to post replies.

    Username: Password: Remember megfedcb Login

    Register now!it only takes an instant.

    Forgot your password?

    http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1336http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&start=0&t=31#p116http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/posting.php?mode=quote&f=16&p=116http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&start=0&t=31#p114http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/ucp.php?mode=sendpasswordhttp://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/ucp.php?mode=registerhttp://ikalogic.com/tut_mech_1.phphttp://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/posting.php?mode=quote&f=16&p=114http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&start=0&t=31#p114http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/posting.php?mode=quote&f=16&p=115http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&start=0&t=31#p115http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/posting.php?mode=quote&f=16&p=116http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&start=0&t=31#p116http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/posting.php?mode=quote&f=16&p=875http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=16&start=0&t=31#p875http://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1336
  • 8/13/2019 Lap Ghep Xe Robot

    13/13

    Home| Forums| contact | Check mail | About Ibrahim KAMAL

    All content on this site is provided as is and without any guarantee of any kind. We cannot be held responsible forany errors, omissions, or damages arising out of use of information available on this web site.

    IMPORTANT COPYRIGHT NOTE:Electronics and Robotics Articles by Ibrahim

    KAMALare licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivative Works 3.0 United States License.

    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/http://www.ikalogic.com/http://www.ikalogic.com/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/http://www.ikalogic.com/ika.phphttp://69.57.128.8/horde/imp/http://www.ikalogic.com/contact.phphttp://www.ikalogic.com/phpBB3/http://www.ikalogic.com/index.php