35
Vietējās pārtikas sistēmas un lauksaimniecības un lauku ilgtspēja Local Food Systems and Sustainability of Agriculture and Rural Areas Ligita Melece, Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece Vidzemes augstskolas docente Head of Department of Quality and Environment Protection, Latvian State Institute of Agrarian Economics Assoc. Prof. of University of Applied Sciences [email protected] Konference „Mārketings un investīcijas” 2012. gada 22. marts Jūrmala

Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

  • Upload
    clint

  • View
    35

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Vietējās pārtikas sistēmas un lauksaimniecības un lauku ilgtspēja Local Food Systems and Sustainability of Agriculture and Rural Areas. Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece Vidzemes augstskolas docente - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Vietējās pārtikas sistēmas un lauksaimniecības un lauku ilgtspēja

Local Food Systems and Sustainability of Agriculture and Rural Areas

Ligita Melece, Dr. oec.

Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Vidzemes augstskolas docente

Head of Department of Quality and Environment Protection, Latvian State Institute of Agrarian Economics

Assoc. Prof. of University of Applied Sciences

[email protected]

Konference „Mārketings un investīcijas”

2012. gada 22. marts

Jūrmala

Page 2: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Content

food systems and local or alternative food systems;

changes and opportunities of agricultural and agrifood sector and rural areas;

role and development opportunities of local food systems.

Page 3: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Food System

Concept of «Food System» is used to describe following complex and interrelated activities: agricultural and food production;

processing;

marketing;

consumption;

waste utilization and disposal activities.

Page 4: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Food System or Food Chain or Network

Page 5: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Local Food System

Local Food System;

Local Food Chain;

Alternative Food System;

Alternative Food Networks;

Alternative Agricultural and Food System or Alternative Agrifood Network, that incorporate:

organic food;

local food;

regional food;

alternative food.

Source: Goodman D., Goodman M., 2007; Maxey L., 2007; Scrinis G., 2007

Page 6: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Avots: adaptēts no Hinrichs C. C., 2003

Page 7: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Changes of Agricultural Producing and Rural Environment

Causes:

New technologies; Intensification; Increase of farm area; Desertification and soil degradation (loss of soil fertility); Urbanization process in Europe (75% of people live in cities; will be 80% untill 2020); Globalization of agribusiness and food system and the impact of large corporations; Economic and financial crisis; Demographic and social crisis in the developed countries.

Consequences: Cuts of employment in agricultural sector;Decreasing farm numbers, particularly small; Aging and declination of rural population; Outflow of labor force; Income reduction.

Possibilities: RDP- environmental measures; Development of new branches and types of business; Rural environment as living space for employees of creative and other sectors and pensioners; etc.

Page 8: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

The aspects of local (regional) food

Economical - the local economy, farms, residents;

Social - employment, strengthening of local community (communities), improving the demographic situation, etc.;

Cultural - cultural and national heritage, crafts, cultural landscape, rural landscape, etc.;

Environmental - shorter food chains, environment and natural resources, sustainable farming, including organic;

Food self-sufficiency in national level.

Page 9: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

The Effect / impact of Globalisation and Concentration

Local food systems can help to secure a fair income for farmers and restore the balance of powers in the food supply chain.

Gglobalization and increased concentration of food distribution have led to a gap between rises:

in production costs (3.6 % a year since 1996);

in consumer prices (3.3 % a year); and

in prices for farmers (2.1 % a year).

Necessary to create systems that improve the negotiation powers of farmers, such as short distribution circuits.

Source: Dwarshuis- van de Beek L. , 2011

Page 10: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Two Directions of Food Production

The first is food production in midle and large-scale enterprises (industrialization and efficient production) mainly for international and regional (EU, former USSR countries, etc.) markets.

To ensure this type of production, companies need to implement the following measures:  industrialization;

  consolidation and modernization;

  increase of competitiveness and innovation;

  focus on regional and global markets;

  quality (ISO 9000, ISO 22 000) and environmental (ISO 14001, EMAS), control systems;

  use of food quality brands.

Page 11: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Two Directions of Food Production

The second direction for further development of the food sector is food production on farms, small and micro-scale enterprises, that comply with principles of sustainable and environmentally friendly food chain and produce value-added food products mainly for the local market.The main conditions for such food production are:

local and artisan (individually) produced food, including organic;

organic food and market development;

local food markets and distribution;

culinary tourism;

“Slow Food“ movement;

voluntary quality schemes.

Page 12: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Trends of Local Food in Europe and Worldwide

Food MilesA consumer report published in 2003 by The Guardian newspaper in the UK found that a selection of 20 fresh food items purchased from British supermarkets had travelled an average of 5,000 miles each; in North America, an average fresh food transport distance of 1,000-1,500 miles is often cited.

Food QualityThe taste qualities of local food are better because of products are fresh and ripe, and not chemically treated for transportation and storage.

Sustainable agro-industrial development Higher demand for locally produced food increase the diversification of farming and helps to maintain soil fertility and biodiversity.

The local economyStrengthening the local economy, providing work for small farmers, creating or saving workplaces, preserving small shops and securing food.

Page 13: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Trends of Local Food in Europe and worldwide

Local or regional food (EU initiative to create logo and distribution limitations 30-50 km);

Craftsmen or artisan food and specialty food;

Movement of Farmer market.

Year 2009

70 cheese producers in Ireland100 cheese producers in Holland2000 specialty food producers in New Zealand

Every £10 spent at a local food business = worth £25 to the local area

Every £10 spent at a supermarket = just £14 to the local area

Source: Halweil B., 2002

Page 14: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Types of the Short Food Chains

Source : Renting H. et al., 2003

Page 15: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Community Supported Local Food System

Farmers markets;

Farm stands – in farms, roadsides etc. places (with coffee drinking and eating places);

Restaurants and cafeteries (supply);

Institutions and companies (schools, hospitals, working places, nursing homes etc.)

Agro tourism;

Weekly food boxes (seasonal);

Pick-up-own-farms;

Cooperative or local government shops;

E-commerce.

Page 16: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Farmers Market - Prague

Page 17: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Farmers Markets – Zurich Train Station

Page 18: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Artisan or Speciality Food in Ireland

Rural Tourism & Artisan Food: Know the Opportunities

Artisan / Speciality Food

Source: http://www.teagasc.ie/ruraldev/progs/artisan_food/artisan_food_in_ireland.asp

Artisan food: unique;

traditional;

individual;

superior taste;

masterfully prepared / produced (craft) – artisan item.70 producers

Speciality food: product of higher quality;

premium pricing;

unique;

regional;

wider application than artisan food.

320 producers, 3,000 workers;0.5 billion EUR value

Page 19: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Artisan Food

“Artisan” is a term used to describe food produced by non-industrialized methods, often handed down through generations but now in danger of being lost. Tastes and processes, such as fermentation, are allowed to develop slowly and naturally, rather than curtailed for mass-production.

There is no single definition of artisan food, but artisan producers: should understand and respect the raw materials with which they work; they should

know where these materials come from and what is particularly good about them; should have mastered the craft of their particular production and have a historical,

experiential, intuitive and scientific understanding of what makes the process that they are engaged in successful;

should know what tastes good and be sensitive to the impact of their production on people and the environment;

get better over time and probably never stop improving or tweaking their practice, learning from other people and their own mistakes.

Source: http://www.schoolofartisanfood.org/about-us/artisan-food

Page 20: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

The first European Declaration on Food Sovereignty (DECLARATION OF NYÉLÉNI)

Declaration on Food Sovereignty (DECLARATION OF NYÉLÉNI)

27 February 2007 Nyéléni Village, Sélingué, Mali

Declaration of the Forum for Food Sovereignty, Nyéléni 2007

Over 500 delegates from 80 countries committed declaration to expanding and consolidating a strong European movement for Food Sovereignty.

Six basic pillars principls of Declaration on Food Sovereignty include:1. Focuses on Food for People.

2. Values Food Providers.

3. Localises Food Systems or Chains.

4. Puts Control Locally.

5. Builds Knowledge and Skills.

6. Works with Nature.

http://www.ukfg.org.uk/pdfs/Securing_future_food.pdf

Page 21: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

European Declaration on Food Sovereignty Nyeleni Europe 2011: European Forum for Food Sovereignty Krems, August 21st

Changing how food is produced and consumed : Resilient food production systems, which provide healthy and safe food for all people in

Europe, also preserving biodiversity and natural resources and ensuring animal welfare. Support multitude of smallholder farmers, gardeners and small-scale fishers who produce

local food as the backbone of the food system. Struggle against the use of GMOs. Promote the consumption of high quality local and seasonal foods and no highly

processed food

Changing how food is distributed: Work towards the decentralization of food chains; Intensified relations between producers and consumers in local food webs to counter the

expansion and power of supermarkets. Building blocks for people to develop their own food distribution systems and allow

farmers to produce and process food for their communities. Promote supportive food safety rules and local food infrastructure for smallholder

farmers.Source: http://www.nyelenieurope.net/

Page 22: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

European Declaration on Food SovereigntyNyeleni Europe 2011: European Forum for Food Sovereignty Krems, August 21st

Valuing and improving work and social conditions in food and agriculture systems:

Struggle against the exploitation and the degradation of working and social conditions in food system, as well as those of seasonal and migrant worker.

Society must give greater value to the role of food producers and workers in our society.

Reclaiming the right to our Commons: Struggle against the commodification, financialisation and patenting of our commons,

such as: land; farmers’, traditional and reproducible seeds; livestock breeds and fish stocks; trees and forests; water; the atmosphere; and knowledge.

Access to these should not be determined by markets and money.

Responsibility to use our Commons sustainably, while respecting therights of mother earth.

Our Commons should be managed through collective, democratic and community control.

Source: http://www.nyelenieurope.net/

Page 23: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

European Declaration on Food Sovereignty Nyeleni Europe 2011: European Forum for Food Sovereignty Krems, August 21st

Changing public policies governing our food and agricultural systems:

Change public policies and governance structures that rule our food systems – from the local to the national, European and global levels – and to delegitimise corporate power.

Public policies must be coherent, complementary and promote and protect food systems and food cultures.

Guarantee legal frameworks that: guarantee stable and fair prices for food producers; promote environmentally-friendly agriculture.

Ensure that speculation on food is banned. No harm is done to existing local or regional food systems and food cultures – either by

dumping or by landgrabbing in Europe, particularly Eastern Europe. Review Common Agriculture and Food Policy. Removal of the EU Biofuels Directive. Global governance of international agricultural trade located in the FAO and not the

WTO.

Source: http://www.nyelenieurope.net/

Page 24: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

EU InitiativesLenie Dwarshuis- van de Beek The EU’s Assembly of Regional and Local Representatives, Brussels, 27 January 2011

There is a skewed balance of power in the agricultural and food sectors which is putting the survival of agriculture at risk.

Around 80% of world food production is sold locally, but in the EU the figure is just 20%, because of the focus on large-scale, industrialised food production.

The new challenges we face such as preventing global shortages of food, fodder and energy, and reducing the environmental damage of food production, strengthen the argument for a reappraisal of local food production as part of the Common Agricultural Policy.

Initiative setting up a monitoring plan at regional level, giving local and regional authorities the responsibility to register and assess local food products and grant them a local food logo.

Source: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=COR/11/3&type=HTML

Page 25: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

EU InitiativesLenie Dwarshuis- van de Beek The EU’s Assembly of Regional and Local Representatives, Brussels, 27 and 28 January 2011

The development of local food systems is particularly relevant for local and regional authorities.

Public procurement involves up to 16 % of the gross domestic product of the EU. Article 6 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (1997) requires the integration of all environmental and social objectives into all EU policies.

Public procurement can simultaneously be sustainable procurement, when used to support wider social, economic and environmental objectives in ways that offer long-term benefits.

From this point of view, governments’ huge spending power could be used as a lever for the development of local food systems.

Source: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2011:104:0001:0006:EN:PDF

Page 26: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

EU InitiativesLenie Dwarshuis- van de Beek The EU’s Assembly of Regional and Local Representatives, Brussels, 27 and 28 January 2011

Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts states that the principle of freedom of movement of goods must be respected at all times, which means that local suppliers cannot be favoured.

However, the regulation allows specific conditions and criteria to be incorporated in the call for tenders concerning public supply contracts, which may include particular aspects and features such as freshness or production circumstances.

This possibility allows local suppliers to be selected.

Nonetheless, the European Commission is asked to explore whether Article 26 of the Regulation could be amended such that ‘locally produced’ can be a standard selection criterion in tenders for the supply of food to, for instance, schools, nursing homes and public facilities.

Page 27: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

EU InitiativesDacian CioloşBrussels, 12 May 2011

As part of his widespread consultation on the future of the CAP, highlights the many benefits of local food systems on rural development. The short chains between producer and consumer promote local jobs and help local businesses acquire a larger market – but they also bring social advantages, as short distribution channels help bring greater interaction between farmers and consumers, thus allowing food producers to react more effectively to demands for sustainable production methods. The reduction in ‘food miles’ they bring means fewer emissions, helping Europe to meet its climate change ambitions as well.

Encourage:

for creation of a pan-European set of guidelines that would help local and regional authorities wishing to integrate local food systems within their regional development programmes to do so effectively;

setting up a monitoring plan at regional level, giving local and regional authorities the responsibility to register and assess local food products and grant them a local food logo.

Page 28: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Added Value of Food Quality

animal welfare;

regional product;

fair prices;

social or care farming (social innovation);

social criteria (family farms; good working conditions);

biodiversity;

cultural aspects.

Source: Hamm, U. Farmer Consumer Partnerships. CORE Organic Workshop, 29.11.2011.

Page 29: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Social or Care Farming

Social or care or green care farming is the therapeutic use of farming practices: Utilize the whole or part of a farm; Provide health, social or educational care services for one or a range of vulnerable groups of people, including those with mental health problems, people suffering from mild to moderate depression, adults and children with learning disabilities, children with autism, those with a drug or alcohol addiction history, disaffected young people, adults and people on probation; Provide a supervised, structured programme of farming-related activities, including animal husbandry (livestock, small animals, poultry), crop and vegetable production, woodland management etc.; Provide services on a regular basis for participants; Clients can also be self-referred as part of the direct payments scheme, or be referred by family members.

Source : http://www.carefarminguk.org; http://sofar.unipi.it/index_file/socialfarfming.htm

Page 30: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Social Farming

Source: http://www.euclidnetwork.eu/data/files/SocialInnovation/editsocialfarming.pdf

Country Number of farms

Netherlands 839

Italy 675

Slovenia 15

Germany 220

Flanders 308

Ireland 106

France 900

Page 31: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Consumers’ InformationEU Logo of Organic Farming

http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/organic/eu-policy/logo_lv

The EU organic farming logo offers consumers’ confidence about the origins and qualities of their food and drink and its presence on any product ensures compliance with the EU organic farming Regulation.From July 2010 the EU organic logo is obligatory for all organic pre-packaged food products within the European Union. It is also possible to use the logo on a voluntary basis for non pre-packaged organic goods produced within the EU or any organic products imported from third countries.

Previous logo Current logo

Page 32: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Creating of Consumers’ Confidence and Information

Ecoproduct

EU logoLatvian logo (unclear formulation andapplication)

EU Ecolabel has added value - a reduced impact on the environment, and respects strict performance standards. The scheme is currently open to all products and services, except for food, drink, pharmaceuticals products and medical devices.

EU environment logo.

Could receive Latvian products and services.

At present in Latvia are textiles, carpets and office paper under this logo.

Reference on Regulations of organic farming and processing;

Certification in accordance with Regulations of organic agri-food requirements done with others;

Catalogue of products are not in accordance with Regulations of EU;

Not clear principles and rules for certification of products, e.g. souvenirs; sauna caps etc.

Non conformity with EU principles.

http://www.ekoprodukti.lv/?id=4

Page 33: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Share of organic products in the food market, %

Source: Loes, A.K., Nolting, B. (2011). Increasing organic consumption through schoolmeals—lessons learned in the iPOPY project

Country Share of organic products in the food market, %

Italy 3.0

Finland 1.0

Germany 3.4

Norway 1.3

Denmark 7.2

Page 34: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Possibilities for Defending Interests of Individual Comersants and Micro Enterprises ( Local and

Artisan Food)

Participation in existing EU and Latvia’s NGO and movements ( LAOCC*; “Slow Food” etc.) and establishing new specific NGO;

Local and regional authorities or governments and LALRG**;

NGO-s of regions and branches;

Lobbing (positive);

Collaboration with FVS;

Public involvement, inter alia consumers;

Legislation initiatives.

* Latvian Agricultural Organization Cooperation Council

** Latvian Association of Local and Regional Governments

Page 35: Ligita Melece , Dr. oec. Latvijas Valsts Agrārās ekonomikas institūta nod. vad., vadošā pētniece

Thank you for attention!