Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© Fraunhofer ISE
METALLIZATION OF PASSIVATING AND CARRIER SELECTIVE CONTACTS: STATUS AND PERSPECTIVES AT FRAUNHOFER ISE
M. Bivour, J. Bartsch, F. Clement, G. Cimiotti, D. Erath, F. Feldmann, T. Fellmeth, M. Glatthaar, M. Hermle, M. Jahn, S. Kluska, R. Keding, A. Lorenz, I. Lacmago-Lontchi, S. Mack, A. Moldovan, J. Nekarda, M. Pospischil, A. Rodofili, J. Rentsch, B. Steinhauser, J. Schube, L. Tutsch, W. Wolke and R. Preu, S. W. Glunz
Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE
7th Metallization Workshop Konstanz, 24th October 2017
© Fraunhofer ISE
2
Passivating Contacts Overcoming Recombination at Metallized Regions
Homojunction + fire-through contacts
Main stream technology
Intrinsic efficiency limitation by J0,met >> J0,pass
Passivating contacts
J0,met = J0,pass
Current challenge:
Establishing industrial cell process including metallization and module integration
Graph adapted from M. Bivour, PhD thesis, University of Freiburg (2015)
© Fraunhofer ISE
3
Passivating Contacts Amorphous Silicon Heterojunction (SHJ)
Champion efficiencies for c-Si solar cells1,2
Back-end process temp. only ~220°C
Not compatible with main stream c-Si technology
Adapted metal electrodes and cells interconnection
Lower line conductivity
a-Si(i)
a-Si(n)
a-Si(p)
TCO
TCO
Si-absorber
1K. Yoshikawa et al., Nature Energy, 2:17032 (2017) 2D. Adachi et al., APL, 107, 233506 (2015)
© Fraunhofer ISE
4
wf,∅ = 34 μm / hf,max∅ = 20 μm
Screen Printing* Low Temperature Ag Paste
Various low-T Ag pastes and drying/curing conditions evaluated
Baseline process: single print
Aspect ratio up to 0.3
Advanced process: double print
Aspect ratio up to 0.6
Finger resistivity ρfinger ~ 6 µΩcm
Contact resistivity ρc < 5 mΩcm2
Double print: 30 µm screen
wf,∅ = 56 μm / hf,max∅ = 13 μm
Single print: 50 µm screen
*D. Erath et al., Energy Procedia, 124, 869-874 (2017)
SHJ
© Fraunhofer ISE
5
Screen Printing* Cell Results
Industrial solar cell precursors
5-busbar layout
Bifacial
Efficiency up to 21.9%
Metallization Area VOC JSC FF η [cm²] [mV] [mA/cm²] [%] [%]
Single print (50 µm) 239 727 37.6 80.1 21.9 best cell, 5-busbar, monofacial measurement, black chuck
*D. Erath et al., Energy Procedia, 124, 869-874 (2017)
wf,∅ = 56 μm / hf,max∅ = 13 μm
Single print: 50 µm screen
SHJ
© Fraunhofer ISE
6
Ink Jet Printing* Towards Lower Ag Consumption
Substrate heating for in-situ drying and ink wetting
Width down to 32 μm for nano-silver-ink
To be tested on cell level
Multi-busbar layout
Seed layer for selective plating using self passivating metal as plating mask1
*D. Erath et al., Energy Procedia, 124, 869-874 (2017) 1M. Glatthaar et al., IEEE J-PV, 99, 1-5 (2017)
SHJ
© Fraunhofer ISE
7 *A. Rodofili et al., Sol. RRL 1 (2017)
TCO a-Si(i/n)
c-Si(n)
dielectric
plated Ag plated Cu
Laser Transfer and Firing of Seed Layer (LTF) + Plating* Overcoming the Need for Plating Resist SHJ
© Fraunhofer ISE
8
TCO a-Si(i/n)
c-Si(n)
Laser Transfer and Firing of Seed Layer (LTF) + Plating* Overcoming the Need for Plating Resist
*A. Rodofili et al., Sol. RRL 1 (2017)
SHJ
© Fraunhofer ISE
9
TCO a-Si(i/n)
c-Si(n)
dielectric
Laser Transfer and Firing of Seed Layer (LTF) + Plating* Overcoming the Need for Plating Resist
*A. Rodofili et al., Sol. RRL 1 (2017)
SHJ
Dielectric layer on TCO as plating mask
© Fraunhofer ISE
10
TCO a-Si(i/n)
c-Si(n)
dielectric
laser transfer
Foil NiV
*A. Rodofili et al., Sol. RRL 1 (2017) 1J. Bohandy et al., Journal of Applied Physics 60, 1538 (1986).
Laser Transfer and Firing of Seed Layer (LTF) + Plating* Overcoming the Need for Plating Resist SHJ
Dielectric layer on TCO as plating mask
Laser induced forward transfer1 of seed layer
Transparent plastic foil with NiV layer
No laser damage
© Fraunhofer ISE
11
TCO a-Si(i/n)
c-Si(n)
dielectric
laser firing
*A. Rodofili et al., Sol. RRL 1 (2017) 1J. Bohandy et al., Journal of Applied Physics 60, 1538 (1986).
Laser Transfer and Firing of Seed Layer (LTF) + Plating* Overcoming the Need for Plating Resist SHJ
Dielectric layer on TCO as plating mask
Laser induced forward transfer1 of seed layer
Transparent plastic foil with NiV layer
No laser damage
Laser firing of seed layer through dielectric
Formation of contact to TCO
No laser damage
© Fraunhofer ISE
12
TCO a-Si(i/n)
c-Si(n)
dielectric
plated Ag plated Cu
Dielectric layer on TCO as plating mask
Laser induced forward transfer1 of seed layer
Transparent plastic foil with NiV layer
No laser damage
Laser firing of seed layer through dielectric
Formation of contact to TCO
No laser damage
Pulse plating to reduce parasitic plating2
*A. Rodofili et al., Sol. RRL 1 (2017) 1J. Bohandy et al., Journal of Applied Physics 60, 1538 (1986) 2M. Glatthaar et al., IEEE J-PV, 99, 1-5 (2017)
Laser Transfer and Firing of Seed Layer (LTF) + Plating* Overcoming the Need for Plating Resist SHJ
© Fraunhofer ISE
13
Industrial precursors
5-busbar layout
Monofacial
Encouraging result for first cell batch
No laser damage
Optics and electrics improved compared to screen printing reference
30 µm
Metallization Area VOC JSC FF η [cm²] [mV] [mA/cm²] [%] [%]
Screen printing 239 727 37.8 79.1 21.7 LTF + Cu plating 239 728 38.0 80.1 22.2
best cells, 5 busbar, monofacial, industrial precursors
*A. Rodofili et al., Sol. RRL 1 (2017)
Laser Transfer and Firing of Seed Layer (LTF) + Plating* Overcoming the Need for Plating Resist SHJ
© Fraunhofer ISE
14
Passivating Contacts* Poly-Si and TOPCon
Back-end process temp. > 220°C
Potentially, more compatible with main stream technology
Currently, evaluation of suitable back-end processes
thin SiOx
doped c-Si emitter
doped Si-film
Passivation / ARC
Homojunction front
Poly-Si or TOPCon rear
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Si-absorber
*Y. Kwark PhD thesis, Stanford Univ. (1985) *F. Feldmann et al., SOLMAT, 120, 270-274 (2014) *U. Römer et al., SOLMAT, 131, 85-91 (2014)
© Fraunhofer ISE
15
40nm n-type TOPCon 800°C Firing of Commercial Ag Screen Printing FT Pastes
SiNx capping
Poor contact
c-Si(n) thin SiOx
n-type Si-film
80nm SiNx
P1 P2 P3 P4
1
10
100
1000
80nm SiNx
ρ c (mΩ
cm2 )
© Fraunhofer ISE
16
40nm n-type TOPCon 800°C Firing of Commercial Ag Screen Printing FT Pastes
SiNx capping
Poor contact
c-Si(n) thin SiOx
n-type Si-film
80nm SiNx
P1 P2 P3 P4
1
10
100
1000
80nm SiNx
ρ c (mΩ
cm2 )
© Fraunhofer ISE
17
40nm n-type TOPCon 800°C Firing of Commercial Ag Screen Printing FT Pastes
SiNx capping
Poor contact
Likely, contact to lowly doped absorber
c-Si(n) thin SiOx
n-type Si-film
80nm SiNx
P1 P2 P3 P4
1
10
100
1000
80nm SiNx
ρ c (mΩ
cm2 )
© Fraunhofer ISE
18
SiNx capping
Poor contact
Likely, contact to lowly doped absorber
ITO / SiNx capping
Very good contact
Likely, contact to highly doped ITO or Si-film
c-Si(n) thin SiOx
n-type Si-film
20nm SiNx
150nm ITO
40nm n-type TOPCon 800°C Firing of Commercial Ag Screen Printing FT Pastes
P1 P2 P3 P4
1
10
100
1000
80nm SiNx
150nm ITO / 20nm SiNx
ρ c (mΩ
cm2 )
© Fraunhofer ISE
19
300nm p-type Poly-Si* Firing of Commercial Ag Screen Printing FT Pastes
Low J0,pass
c-Si(p) thin SiOx
p-type Si-film
*S. Mack et al., EUPVSEC, (2017)
80nm SiNx
before firing
780°C810°C
840°C870°C
900°C0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16SDE surface, SiNx
J0,
pass
(fA
/cm
2 )
© Fraunhofer ISE
20
300nm p-type Poly-Si* Firing of Commercial Ag Screen Printing FT Pastes
Low J0,pass
J0,met increases with Tfiring
J0,met >> J0,pass
780 810 840 870 90010
100
1000 Ag 1 Ag 2 Ag 3
J 0,m
et (f
A/c
m2 )
Firing set temperature (°C)
c-Si(p) thin SiOx
p-type Si-film
*S. Mack et al., EUPVSEC, (2017)
80nm SiNx
© Fraunhofer ISE
21
300nm p-type Poly-Si* Firing of Commercial Ag Screen Printing FT Pastes
Low J0,pass
J0,met increases with Tfiring
J0,met >> J0,pass
Local penetration / damage of poly-Si*,1
c-Si(p) thin SiOx
p-type Si-film
900°C
80nm SiNx
*S. Mack et al., EUPVSEC, (2017) 1H.E. Çiftpinar et al., Energy Procedia, 124, 851-861 (2017)
© Fraunhofer ISE
22
300nm p-type Poly-Si* Firing of Commercial Ag Screen Printing FT Pastes
Low J0,pass
J0,met increases with Tfiring
J0,met >> J0,pass
Local penetration / damage of poly-Si*,1
Low ρc for Ag2
c-Si(p) thin SiOx
p-type Si-film
80nm SiNx
780 810 840 870 9001
10
100
1000
Ag1 Ag2 Ag3
ρ c (mΩ
cm2 )
Firing set temperature (°C)
SDE surface, SiNx
*S. Mack et al., EUPVSEC, (2017) 1H.E. Çiftpinar et al., Energy Procedia, 124, 851-861 (2017)
© Fraunhofer ISE
23
300nm p-type Poly-Si Firing of Commercial Ag Screen Printing FT Pastes
840°C
J0,pass ≈ 5fA/cm2
J0,met ≈ 250fA/cm2
ρc = 2mΩcm2
*S. Mack et al., EUPVSEC, (2017)
80nm SiNx
c-Si(p) thin SiOx
p-type Si-film
© Fraunhofer ISE
24
Non-Firing Approach: Evaporated Ag High Efficiency Front Side Required
High efficiency homojunction front essential to benefit from passivating contact at rear
TOPCon + evaporated Ag
J0,met = J0,pass
25.8%1 lab-type cells
Metallization Area VOC JSC FF η
Front / Rear [cm²] [mV] [mA/cm²] [%] [%] Photolithography / evaporated Ag 4 (da) 724 42.9 83.1 25.81
Certified by Fraunhofer ISE CalLab, da: designated area
1A. Richter et al., EUPVSEC, (2017)
p++
busbar DARC: SiNx + MgF2
Al2O3
p+
evaporated Ag
thin SiOx
n-type Si-film
c-Si(n)
selective boron emitter
finger
© Fraunhofer ISE
25
Non-Firing Approach: Evaporated Ag First Cell Batch Practicale Size
Homogeneous boron emitter
LCO + Cu-plating front side
TOPCon + evaporated Ag
22.9%1
Metallization Area VOC JSC FF η Front / Rear [cm²] [mV] [mA/cm²] [%] [%]
LCO + Cu-plating / evaporated Ag 100 (ap) 694 40.8 81.0 22.91
In-house measurement, ap: aperture area
SiNx/AlOx ARC
1F. Feldmann et al., EUPVSEC, (2017)
evaporated Ag
c-Si(n)
homogeneous boron emitter
thin SiOx
n-type Si-film
© Fraunhofer ISE
26
metal
TCO
Non-Firing Approach Current Work
TCO / metal stacks
Similar to SHJ but >> 200°C
evaporated Ag
c-Si(n)
homogeneous boron emitter
metal
TCO
© Fraunhofer ISE
27
Summary
Amorphous Silicon Heterojunction (Tback-end < 220°C)
Baseline screen printing process (η = 21.9%)
Ink jet printing of nano-silver ink promising for multi-busbar / plating
Novel laser transfer of seed layer + Cu plating (η = 22.2%)
TOPCon and poly-Si (Tback-end > 220°C)
So far, J0,met >> J0,pass for firing-through metallization
Only commercial Ag pastes investigated
Hence, lots of room for improvement for paste optimization
Non-firing approach under evaluation
LCO + Cu-plating for high performance diffused front side
TCO + metal optimized for > 220°C
© Fraunhofer ISE
28
Acknowledgments
Part of this work was funded by German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy under contract number 03225877D (PEPPER) 0324086A (HIPPO) 0325574 (Folmet) 0325825B (HERA) 0324125 (PV BAT 400) and by the EU’s HORIZON 2020 programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no. 727529 (PROJECT DISC)
Thank You Very Much for Your Attention!
The authors would like to thank all colleagues at Fraunhofer ISE
© Fraunhofer ISE
29
Approach 2: Selective plating using conductive mask
Al ITO
a-Si(i/n)
c-Si(n)
a-Si(i/p) ITO
Al
Precursor:
M. Glatthaar et al., IEEE J-PV, 99, 1-5 (2017)
© Fraunhofer ISE
30
Inkjet
particle-free Ag-ink
Step 1: seed layer print on both sides
Approach 2: Selective plating using conductive mask
M. Glatthaar et al., IEEE J-PV, 99, 1-5 (2017)
© Fraunhofer ISE
31
plated Ag plated Cu
Step 2: simultaneous plating on both sides
Approach 2: Selective plating using conductive mask
M. Glatthaar et al., IEEE J-PV, 99, 1-5 (2017)
© Fraunhofer ISE
32
plated Ag plated Cu
Step 3: etching of Al layers
Approach 2: Selective plating using conductive mask
M. Glatthaar et al., IEEE J-PV, 99, 1-5 (2017)
© Fraunhofer ISE
33
TOPCon TCO Sputterdamage
> 200°C needed to cure damage
Si-absorber thin SiOx
doped Si-film TCO
before ITOafter ITO
200°C 300°C 350°C
660670680690700710720730740
iVoc
(mV
)
© Fraunhofer ISE
34
TOPCon TCO Sputterdamage
> 200°C needed to cure damage
> 200°C poor mobility
Trade-off passivation and TCO
Si-absorber thin SiOx
doped Si-film TCO
100 200 300 400 50015
20
25
30
35
40
45
Mob
ility
(cm
²/Vs)
Annealing temperature (°C)
5.0x1019
1.0x1020
1.5x1020
2.0x1020
2.5x1020
3.0x1020
Car
rier d
ensi
ty (c
m-3)