46
PRA 評評評評評評評 評評評 100 評 6 評 20 評 評評評評評 評評評評評評評評評 評評評評評評

PRA 評估改善的效果

  • Upload
    aloha

  • View
    117

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

PRA 評估改善的效果. 林家德 100 年 6 月 20 日 日本福島第一核能電廠事故研討會 原子能委員會. PRA 簡介. Probabilistic Risk Assessment ( 或稱 QRA) 約於 1960 年代萌芽,為結合可靠度、故障樹與事件樹分析等之方法論 1975 年美國 WASH-1400 報告為該方法論首次完整具體展現 1988 IPE + IPEEE 1995 年美國 NRC 發表 PRA policy statement 風險告知應用 ( 管制與運轉決策制訂 ) PRA 標準 火災 PRA. 美國核能工業界風險告知應用經驗. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

  • PRA

    100620

  • PRAProbabilistic Risk Assessment (QRA)19601975WASH-14001988 IPE + IPEEE1995NRCPRA policy statement()PRAPRA

  • From Feb. 2009 NEI(T. Pietrangelo to USNRC)

  • NRC(Safety Goal) (Quantitative Health Objective, QHO)(1986)(1 mile)0.1% 110-5 /yr (QHO)

  • EPZNUREG-0396 (MACCS2) * (NUREG-0396)100110-4NUREG-039670% (170%) 110-4 = 310-5 100

    *NUREG-0396 (EPA 520/1-78-016), "Planning Basis for the Development of State and Local Government Radiological Emergency Response Plans in Support of Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants," USNRC, December 1978. H.N. Jow, J.L. Sprung, J.A. Rollstin, L.T. Ritchie, and D.I. Chanin, MELCOR Accident Consequence Code System (MACCS). NUREG/CR-4691, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, USA (1990).From: 100.5.31

  • ()RG 1.174

  • PRiSESDP2006PRiSE

  • PRA/()How likely is it?What are the consequences?What can go wrong?//

  • (0.5g PGA) + (, 10~14)AC (loss of almost all I&Cs) (SBO)

  • IAEA(2002) 14/11/80 Garigliano 3/12/82 Dresden 6031/3/94 Cooper ()13/12/80 Hinkley 22/1/84 Borssele ()() 12/1999 Blayais 1985 17 (source: NRC generic reports in IRS)11/7/2000 Chernobyl 3 RF

  • IAEA(2002)(1) ()17/10/80 Indian Point 87+11/12/89 Clinton 12/1/87 St. Laurent 19801990 ()1985 (33)(UHS)1982 1999 800

  • IAEA(2002)(2)30 19885 32 134 6 () 6 2 3

  • IAEA(2002)

  • 1CooperBWR19937RCIC

  • 2Calvert CliffsPWR20024158260/

  • 3Davis-Besse19986F2113156 mph99%11ECCS41NRC24110140

  • 4Turkey Point1992830145mph175mph564CST

  • (SBO)copingACSBO SBOACACSBO

  • SBOAC44coping SBO4coping4ACAC60

  • SBO()AC(MOV)RCICHPCI()357(Class 1)125

  • Sheet1

    ABCDFCCDP

    E(K)R(V)R(P)E(W)A(P)C(M)O(P)D(0)D(5)S(A)

    S01OK6.7E-020.0E+00

    S02ES7.9E-052.6E-073.3E-03

    S03EO7.0E-054.8E-076.9E-03

    S04EOS8.2E-068.7E-081.1E-02

    S05EO52.8E-063.9E-081.4E-02

    S06EO5S8.4E-072.5E-083.0E-02

    S07EOD1.5E-11

    S08EODS7.3E-117.3E-111.0E+00

    S09CM2.0E-102.0E-101.0E+00

    S10EC1.9E-061.5E-077.8E-02

    S11ECS3.6E-071.4E-084.0E-02

    S12ECO8.6E-071.3E-071.5E-01

    S13ECOS5.0E-075.3E-081.1E-01

    S14CM9.3E-119.3E-111.0E+00

    S15CM3.2E-063.2E-061.0E+00

    S16CM2.7E-092.7E-091.0E+00

    S17CM7.5E-087.5E-081.0E+00

    S18CM1.0E-061.0E-061.0E+00

    6.7E-02

    1.7E-041.0E-06WinNUPRA

    5.6E-06CDF

    0.00251

  • ()

  • SBO

  • SBO

  • 11()////

  • 11()5480V /

  • 11(1)

    ECW

  • 11(2)

    /

  • 11(3)()()//

  • (Gas turbine)

  • To Power Grid

    To Power Grid

    Breaker

    Breaker

    Breaker

    Breaker

    Breaker

    Breaker

    NO

    NO

    161 KV BUS 2

    NC

    NC

    NO

    NO

    NO

    To Unit 1 RAT 2

    To Unit 1 RAT 1

    161 KV BUS 1

    To Unit 2 RAT 1

    To Unit 2 RAT 2

    BREAKER

    VVVVVV

    VVVV

    TRANSFORMER

    GAS TURBINE

    GT

    NO

    NC

    NC

    NO

    NO

    NC

    NC

  • 0.61g and U=0.18, R=0.08

  • PRA

    67% (CDF)98% (LERF)

  • ()1 Case 2 1.2

  • Region III

    Region II

    Region I

    1E-5

    1E-7

    1E-5

    1E-4

    CDF(/RY)

    1E-6

    1E-5

    LERF(/RY)

    1E-6

    1E-6

    DCDF(/RY)

    DLERF(/RY)

    CDF

    LERF

    CDF

    LERF

    Case 2

    Case 1

  • 1CDF 9.5%LERF2.3% 1 220%CDF5.6E-7/ (-9.2%)LERF 5.5E-8/ (-7.5%)

  • 125DC24()()RHR AB()()()

  • PRA()PRA(PRA)

  • A. Giddens (UK)() 911D. Ropeik (USA, 2011)Michigan9111,018

  • PRAPRAPRA()PRAPRAPRAIAEAPRA