Upload
vudan
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Producing High Impact Research in the Field of Medicine
Cyrus Cooper OBE, DL, FMedSci
Professor of Rheumatology and Director, MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit; and Vice-Dean, Faculty of Medicine; University of
Southampton; UK
Inside Government Forum – Future of UK REF; January 2017
High Impact Research in Medicine
• Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton • Global burden of disease • The lifecourse approach: from theory to practice
– Musculoskeletal ageing – Childhood obesity
• Impact on Health Policy: Global, national & regional
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton
University Hospital Southampton
Faculty of Medicine: Overarching Research Strategy
Translational Research
Converting knowledge into new treatments
and therapies
Interdisciplinary Research
Achieving step change in the generation of
new knowledge
Research Centre
Industry
Research Councils And Charities
Research Structure: Academic Units
• Cancer Sciences
• Clinical and Experimental Sciences
• Human Development and Health
• Primary Care and Population Science
• Medical Education
1,000 staff; £100m pa
Southampton Centre for Biomedical Research
• Clinical and biomedical research partnership with University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
• Supported by £27M National Institute for Health Research funding
• NIHR/Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility
• NIHR Nutrition Biomedical Research Centre
• NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit
• NIHR/Cancer Research UK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre
• MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit
National Centres of Excellence in FoM, University of Southampton
6
MRC Unit/Centre CRUK Centre
NIHR BRU NIHR BRC CLAHRC
ARUK
REF 2014 University of Southampton: UoA1 (Clinical Medicine)
overall outputs impact environment
4* 25 16.9 61.3 12.5
3* 50 46.1 33.4 87.5
2* 21 31.1 5.3 0
1* 2 2.4 0 0
U 2 3.5 0 0
Category A fte = 143.39 Eligible staff Returned= 85%
• Large, inclusive submission with a high power index • 64% of our outputs are internationally excellent or world leading • Over 60% of our impact is World-leading and 94% 4*/3*. • We enjoy an excellent research environment (100% 4*/3*) • Improvement on RAE08 (128-143 fte; 10-17% 4*output; 0-12.5% 4*env)
HEI Power
UCL 1439.424
Imperial 1112.819
Oxford 823.722
Edinburgh 682.869
Cambridge 658.7315
Glasgow 567.68
Birmingham 499.016
QMUL 472.648
Newcastle 470.816
KCL 464.95
Liverpool 450
Manchester 434.4142
Southampton 422.1546
Nottingham 323.544
Leeds 292.02
Bristol 260.9505
ICR 230.0697
Leicester 218.463
QUB 211.968
Sheffield 200.803
Cardiff 191.7825
LSHTM 176.5296
Aberdeen 156.927
Dundee 150.48
St Georges 129.8
Warwick 98.6675
Exeter 77.42
Plymouth 45.82
StAndrews 44.64
UEA 42.624
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
0200400600800
1000120014001600
0 200 400 600
REF 2014: Research Power
Global Burden of Disease 2015 Most frequent causes of disability
GBD Collaborative Group Lancet 2015; 386: 2287-323 Newton J et al Lancet 2015; 386: 2257-74
Mis
sion
Mission
To develop preventive strategies against common, chronic musculoskeletal and metabolic disorders
Pro
gra
mm
es R
esea
rch
foc
us
Prog
ramm
es R
esearch focu
s
Nutrition and lifelong health
Development and body composition Health and work
Sarcopenia and frailty Bone and joint
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit 2015-2020
Child
Fetus & infant
Adult
Intervention Observation
Mechanisms
Developmental origins of adult disease
David Barker 1936-2013 Birth weight (pounds)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-5.5 -6.5 -7.5 -8.5 -9.5 >9.5
Osmond et alBMJ 1993
Lifecourse determinants of health and disease
ME
CH
AN
ISM
S
Developmental plastic responses Epigenetic processes
Childhood body composition and development
Infant feeding and illnesses
Infant body composition & development Weight gain and catch-up growth
Young women’s diet, body composition, physical activity, education and lifestyle before and during pregnancy
Childhood diet, physical activity, lifestyle and education
Vulnerability to chronic disease in later life
Work, lifestyle and health behaviours in adulthood
Retirement and ageing
Gluckman, Hanson, Cooper et al New Engl J Med 2008; 359: 61-73 Harvey N, Dennison E, Cooper C J Bone Miner Res 2014; 29: 1917-25
Chronic NCD risk
Plasticity
Life course
No intervention
Mother & infant
Earlier intervention improves functional capacity & responses to new challenges
Inadequate response to new challenges
Childhood
Adulthood
Early intervention
Late intervention
Late intervention impactful for vulnerable groups
Lifecourse strategy for disease prevention
Godfrey K et al Trends Endocrinol Metab 2010; 21: 199-205
Example 1 Musculoskeletal Ageing
Normal Bone Osteoporosis
Definition of Osteoporosis
A disorder characterised by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue leading to an increased risk of fracture
Impact of Osteoporosis-Related Fractures in Europe
Hip Spine Wrist Lifetime risk (%)
Women 14 11 13 Men 3 4 2
Cases/yr 615k 516m 560k
Hospitalisation (%) 100 2-5 5
Relative survival 0.83 0.82 1.00
All sites combined: n=3.5m; cost ~ 39 billion Euros
Hernlund E et al Arch Osteop 2013; 8(1-2): 136
Developmental origins of osteoporosis • LBW associated with reduced adult bone mass and strength
• Independent of known genetic determinants of BW and BMD
• Poor childhood growth predicts fracture
12,500 non-pregnant Southampton women aged 20-34 years interviewed about diet, body composition, physical activity, social
circumstances & lifestyle. Buccal and blood samples taken.
Subsequent pregnancies studied (n=3,160).
Ultrasound scans at 11, 19 & 34 weeks.
Interviews at 11 & 34 weeks
Maternal blood samplesPaternal buccal & blood
samplesMaternal grandparents’
buccal samples
Neonatal anthropometry.
Cord bloods
Children followed-up at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months;And at 4, 6, 8 & 10 years
Southampton Women’s Survey
Harvey N et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93: 1676-81
Maternal vitamin D status and childhood bone mass
Maternal 25(OH) vitamin D (µg/L)
Javaid MK et al Lancet 2006;367:36-43
Princess Anne Hospital Cohort Study, Southampton; Age 9yrs
Distal femur splaying index = cross-sectional area (cm ²) ÷ length (cm)
p<0.001, r = -0.17,n = 391
<27.5 -50 -80 >800.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
Maternal 25-OH vitamin D (34 weeks gestation, nmol/L)
Spla
ying
inde
x
Mahon P et al J Bone Miner Res 2010; 25: 14-19 Ioannou C et al J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012; 97: 2070-7 Yaqub M et al Fetal Diag Ther 2013; e-pub
Maternal vitamin D and automated intrauterine femoral measurement using 3D ultrasound
DNA methylation
Epigenetic mechanisms in vitamin D signalling
r = -0.175p = 0.007
2.45
2.5
2.55
2.6
2.65
2.7
WB
MH
- %
BM
C
to 53.0 to 66.0 to 82.0 > 82.0RXRA-3 Percentage of methylation
r = -0.199p = 0.002
2.45
2.5
2.55
2.6
2.65
2.7
WB
MH
- %
BM
C
to 45.0 to 56.0 to 73.0 > 73.0RXRA-2 Percentage of methylation
30 6
6
r=-0.18 p=0.007
r=-0.2 p=0.002
Harvey NC et al. J Bone Min Res 2014; 29: 600-7
BMC vBMD
Can we intervene during development?
Maternal vitamin D supplementation and childhood bone mass: the MAVIDOS
trial The MAVIDOS Trial Study Group
Cyrus Cooper1,2,3*, Nicholas C Harvey1,2,*, Nicholas J Bishop4, Stephen Kennedy5, Aris T Papageorghiou5, Robert Fraser6, Saurabh V Gandhi6, Stefania D’Angelo1, Sarah R Crozier1, Rebecca J Moon1, Nigel K
Arden3, Elaine M Dennison1, Keith M Godfrey1,2, Hazel M Inskip1, Inez Schoenmakers7, Ann Prentice7, Zulf Mughal8, Richard Eastell9, David Reid10, M Kassim Javaid3 and the MAVIDOS Study Group
1MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, (University of Southampton), Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; 2NIHR Southampton Nutrition Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; 3Oxford NIHR Musculoskeletal
Biomedical Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, The Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; 4Academic Unit of Child Health, Sheffield Children’s Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; 5Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; 6Sheffield Hospitals NHS Trust (University of Sheffield), Sheffield, UK; 7MRC Human Nutrition Research, Elsie
Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge, UK; 8Central Manchester University Hospitals, Manchester, UK; 9Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; 10School of Medicine & Dentistry, Medical School, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Cooper C et al. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2016; 4: 393-402.
Pregnancies at nuchal US scan
Booking (11/40)
Not eligible Randomisation
D3 1,000iu/d Placebo
Anthropometry, DXA
Anthropometry, DXA
Check 25D ALP, Ca, Albumin
Birth
4 years
14/40
Repeat 25D ALP, Ca, albumin, glucose 36/40
>100 nmol/l
25-100 nmol/l n=477
each arm
MAVIDOS Sub-studies:
•Bone turnover in mother/cord blood
•Maternal DXA
•Placental/cord epigenetic studies
•Maternal VDR genotyping
Vitamin D Supplementation in Pregnancy: The MAVIDOS Trial
Cooper C et al. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2016; 4: 393-402.
Vitamin D supplementation increases offspring BMC in winter births
p=0.004
5060
70
Who
le b
ody
BM
C (
g)
Placebo 1000 IU/d
Winter
p=0.44
5060
70
Placebo 1000 IU/d
Spring
p=0.73
5060
70
Placebo 1000 IU/d
Summer
p=0.21
5060
70
Placebo 1000 IU/d
Autumn
Mean (95% CI) p interaction=0.04 p interaction = 0.04
Cooper C et al. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2016; 4: 393-402.
Maternal vitamin D supplementation prevents decline in 25(OH)-vitamin D during pregnancy in winter and spring births
Placebo 1000 IU/day cholecalciferol
winter
spring
summer
autumn
2535
4555
6575
25(O
H)D
(nm
ol/l
)
14 34Gestation (weeks)
winter
spring
summer
autumn
2535
4555
6575
25(O
H)D
(nm
ol/l
)
14 34Gestation (weeks)
Cooper C et al. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2016; 4: 393-402.
Conclusions of MAVIDOS trial
• Maternal antenatal vitamin D supplementation with 1000 IU cholecalciferol daily resulted in higher offspring bone mass in winter births
• Summer to winter decline in maternal vitamin D status abolished with supplementation
• 1000 IU cholecalciferol daily resulted in vitamin D repletion in over 80% of women
• These findings suggest that a stratified approach to vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy may be warranted
Example 2 Childhood Obesity
CHILDHOOD OBESITY
LOW/NO BREASTFEEDING,
UNHEALTHY COMPLEMENTARY
FOODS, UNHEALTHY
FAMILY BEHAVIOURS
MARKETING OF UNHEALTHY
FOODS AIMED AT CHILDREN
POOR SCHOOL FOOD, LOW PHYSICAL ACTIVITY,
SEDENTARY LIFESTYLE
LOW NUTRITION & HEALTH LITERACY
Origins of childhood obesity
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
None GCSED-G
GCSEA-C
A level HND Degree
Highest educational qualification
Educational attainment and dietary pattern in women of child-bearing age
Robinson S et al EJCN 2004; 58: 1174-78
% of women in lowest quarter of prudent diet score
Lack of money (food insecurity)
Food involvement
Expectations of outcome of eating
healthily
Social support for healthy eating
Why do women of lower educational attainment tend to have a poorer quality diet than women of higher educational attainment?
Quality of diet
General self-efficacy
Perceived control
Educational attainment
Lawrence WT et al Appetite 2011; 56: 46-52
Southampton Initiative for Health: A complex intervention to improve food choice among women of
child-bearing age
• Design – before and after non-randomised trial • Study population – women attending Sure Start Children’s
Centres, and their children
PRINCIPLE FINDING: Improvement in control and self-efficacy; more modest benefit on dietary pattern
Barker M et al J Hlth Psychol 2011; 16: 178-91 Baird J et al BMJ Open; 2014: 4: e005290
BEHAVIOUR CHANGE INTERVENTION: • 3 x 3 hour sessions over 5 weeks • 8 people per group with 2 facilitators • Session 1: Thinking about change • Session 2: Practising Healthy Conversations • Session 3: Embedding lasting change • Follow up: Ongoing contact with trained staff
Community nutrition environment
Organisational nutrition environment
Psychological factors
Perceived food accessibility
Environmental variables
Individual variables
Behavioural outcome
Food environment and dietary behaviour
Dietary behaviour
Consumer nutrition environment
Perceived food affordability
0.55**
-0.01
-0.02
-0.06
-0.15**
Standardised regression weights *<0.05, **<0.01
0.14*
-0.14*
Black C et al Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2014; 11:69
e" \ World Health
RKIOIW.omaFOA Europe
First announcement
WHO EuropeanMinisterial Conference
on the life-course approach in the context of Health 2020
The WHO European Ministerial Conference will bring together newevidence, from genetics to economics, on what governments cando to engender health throughout the life-course. The Conference
will equip policy-makers to promote a healthy start to lifeand to target the needs of people at critical ages.
Participants: Health min1sters. nat1onal delegations from Member States 1ntheWHO European Region, representatives from intergovernmental organizations, reg1onal
economic cooperation agenc1es and International nongovernmental organizations.
21 - 22 October 2015 Minsk, Belarus
I
, I _
( . \ World Health-Organization"""""'oma001 Europe
The life-course approachin the context of Health 2020:
From evidenceto policy and action
OFf:RE"J E-E-OTOf'..l
The MinskDeclarationThe Life-course Approachin the Context of Health 2020
(tfi l World Healtht ! Organization
- - ' ?
AEGIONALOFFicEFoR Europe
• Minimise childhood exposure to poverty and health inequalities • Recognise that education is a major social determinant of health • Promote quality preconceptional information/services/care, including women from disadvantaged backgrounds • Promote, support and protect breastfeeding • Support families to build parenting capacities • Develop or strengthen health-promoting structures and processes • Create safe and decent work environments and promote job security • Extend mother and child care to protect against stresses that may affect the next generation
The WHO Minsk Declaration Acting Early, Appropriately and Collectively
WHO European Ministerial Conference The Minsk Declaration (2015): Lifecourse approach in the context
of Health 2020 and Sustainable Development Goals
WHO 2016 Science & Evidence Working Group Chair: Mark Hanson
NICE Guidance Maternal vitamin D supplementation Prevention of childhood obesity
With thanks to all at the University of Southampton!