Upload
dinhtuyen
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
C.W. Chou, H. Deng, K.S. Choi, H. de Riedmatten, D. Felinto, H.J. Kimble
Caltech Quantum OpticsFRISNO 2007, February 12, 2007
Julien [email protected]
Julien [email protected]
Quantum Communication with Atomic Ensembles
Quantum Communication with Atomic Ensembles
EntanglementEntanglement : : ParadoxParadox to Applicationsto Applications
…Product states
… Entangled states
A B
.Cryptography Teleportation
Classical communication.
Entanglement : Non classical correlations
between distant systems
.EPR correlations
. .EPR correlations
.
…… AtAt Long DistancesLong Distances
A quantum state can’t be amplified
Fibre Optique
TelecomRepeater
Problem : DecoherenceCaltech
Les Houches.Result : Entanglement decays exponentially with the distance
Solution : Repeater
…… AtAt Long DistancesLong Distances
Caltech .
. QuantumRepeater .
Goal : Connect with a fidelity close to 1 in a “not too long” time
Les Houches
Problem : Decoherence
Result : Entanglement decays exponentially with the distance
Solution : Repeater
Quantum Quantum RepeatersRepeaters : : PrinciplesPrinciples
1) Divide into segments andgenerate entanglement
. .. .. .L0 L0 L0
L
2) Purify the entanglement. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . F<1
. .. .. . F~1
3) Connect the pairs. .. .. .. .
Fidelity close to 1, long distance… But time
exponentially large withthe distance
Entanglement (often) andpurification (always) are probabilistic : each stepends at different times.
. . ..
Quantum Quantum RepeatersRepeaters : : PrinciplesPrinciples
1) Divide into segments andgenerate entanglement
. .. .. .L0 L0 L0
L
2) Purify the entanglement. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . F<1
. .. .. . F~1
3) Connect the pairs. .. .. .. .. . ..
« Scalability » : requiresthe storage of the
entanglement
: Quantum Memories
Fidelity close to 1, long distance… But time
exponentially large withthe distance
Entanglement (often) andpurification (always) are probabilistic : each stepends at different times.
Quantum NetworkQuantum Network
• Cavity QED
Ideal system but difficult to scale up.
• Single atom
• Atomic Ensembles
Continuous Variables
Single Excitation
Requirement :Atom-light interface
Quantum nodegenerate, process, store
quantum information
Quantum channel –transport / distribute
quantum entanglement
Quantum networks enabled by distributed entanglement
• « DLCZ building block » : writing, reading, memory time
• Entanglement between twoensembles
• Simultaneous storage of twoexcitations in two remote ensembles
• Polarization entanglement betweentwo nodes
OutlineOutline
Real-time ConditionalControl of Quantum
Memories
«« Building Block Building Block »» (DLCZ)(DLCZ)
• Large ensemble of atoms
• With a Λ-type level configuration
Duan, Lukin, Cirac and Zoller, “Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics”, Nature 414, 413 (2001)
CreatingCreating a Single a Single AtomicAtomic Excitation Excitation
Nonclassical correlations between field 1 and the ensemble
Field 1
Field 1
Write
WriteCollective atomic state
: the excitation probability
RetrievingRetrieving thethe Single ExcitationSingle Excitation
Read
Read
Field 2
Field 2
read
Nonclassical correlations between fields 1 and 2
Nonclassical correlations between field 1 and the ensemble
ExperimentalExperimental SetupSetup
Field 1
Field 2
Write H
Read V
V
H
Si APD
Counter-propagating and off-axis configuration
30 ns, Very weak200 µm
ConditionalConditional FieldField--22
cqRead
Field 2
Retrieval efficiencyof the stored excitation
?
J. Laurat et al., “Efficient retrieval of a single excitation stored in an atomic ensemble”, Opt. Express 14, 6912 (2006)
Suppression of the two-photon component
Coherent state limit
Sub-Poissonian
α = 0.7 ± 0.3%
qc ~ 50%
Plateau :Single excitation
Background noise
Multi-excitations
StorageStorage TimeTime
Field 1Write ReadField 2
Programmable DelayAround 10µs
Writing Reading
D. Felinto et al., Phys. Rev. A 72, 053809 (2005)
H. De Riedmatten, J. Laurat, C.W. Chou, E.W. Schomburg, D. Felinto H.J. Kimble, “Direct measurement of decoherence for entanglement between a photon and a stored excitation”, PRL 97, 113603 (2006)
• « DLCZ building block » : writing, reading, memory time
• Entanglement between twoensembles
• Simultaneous storage of twoexcitations in two remote ensembles
• Polarization entanglement betweentwo nodes
OutlineOutline
Atoms
Light
entangled
Atoms
Light
entangled
50/50 Beam splitter
EntanglementEntanglement betweenbetween TwoTwo EnsemblesEnsembles
1 photon detected ⇔ 1 atom transferred
50/50 Beam splitter
EntanglementEntanglement betweenbetween TwoTwo EnsemblesEnsembles
HowHow to to VerifyVerify thethe EntanglementEntanglement ??
•Tomography
2L
2R
• Individual statistics pij
• Coherence d2L
2R
où
Concurrence /C > 0 ⇒ Entanglement of formation E > 0
W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245(1998)
atoms L
atoms R
entangled?
,L Rρ
L
R
Map matter state to field state
2 ,2L Rρ
2L
2R
ExperimentalExperimental DensityDensity MatrixMatrix
Populations Coherence
<1, suppression of 2-photon events relative to single-excitation events
2L
2R
2L
2R
D1c
D1b
• « DLCZ building block » : writing, reading, memory time
• Entanglement between twoensembles
• Simultaneous storage of twoexcitations in two remote ensembles
• Polarization entanglement betweentwo nodes
OutlineOutline
Real-Time ConditionalControl of Quantum
Memories
SimultaneousSimultaneous StorageStorage ofof Single Single Excitations in Excitations in TwoTwo RemoteRemote MemoriesMemories
LWrite
Field 1
Repumper
Write
Repumper
Field 1 R
44-fold increase in p11!(N=23, 12µs)
p11 : Probability of both ensembles are prepared with one excitation, heralded by the two field-1 clicks.
FirstFirst Application : HOMApplication : HOM
Field 2 Field 2λ/2
BS
L R
V=0.77±0.06(Integrated data)
28-fold increase in p1122!(N=23, 12µs)
Two independent sources of single photons
D. Felinto, C.W. Chou, J. Laurat, H. de Riedmatten, H. Kimble, “Conditional control of the quantum states of remote atomic memories for Q. networking”, Nature Physics 2, 844 (2006)
• « DLCZ building block » : writing, reading, memory time
• Entanglement between twoensembles
• Simultaneous storage of twoexcitations in two remote ensembles
• Polarization entanglement betweentwo nodes
OutlineOutline
How How HavingHaving oneone Click on Click on EachEach SideSide ??
Entangled !
Entangled !DRa
DRb
BSDLa
DLb
BS
LU
LD RD
RU
“Effective” state giving one click on each side
ϕR2RU
2RD
2LU
2LD
ϕL
Node L Node R
3 m
PolarizationPolarization EntanglementEntanglement
2RU
2RD
2LU
2LD
LU
LD RD
RU
“Effective” state giving one click on each side
2L 2R
Node L Node R
3 m
Write Repumper
Read
λ/2λ/4
PBS
Compensator
Beam displacer
LU
LD
RU
RD
D2RV
D2RH
D2LV
D2LH
D1Va
D1Ha D1Hb
D1Vb
BSW
BS1
BSR
LU
LD
ExperimentalExperimental SetupSetup
Write
Interferometers Entangling the (U, D) Pairs
Repumper
Read
λ/2λ/4
PBS
Compensator
Beam displacer
LU
LD
RU
RD
D2RV
D2RH
D2LV
D2LH
D1Va
D1Ha D1Hb
D1Vb
BSW
BS1
BSR
ExperimentalExperimental SetupSetup
ResultsResults : Bell Violation: Bell Violation
Duration that the first entanged pair is stored before retrieval
Large violation : quantum key
distribution with security at minimum against individual attacks
C.W. Chou, J. Laurat, H. Deng, K.S. Choi, H. de Riematten, D. Felinto, H.J. Kimble, Functional Quantum Nodes for Entanglement Distribution over a Scalable Quantum Networks, arxiv\quant-ph 0702057
• 2 nodes separated by 3m
• 2 ensembles per node
• Asynchronous preparation(memory) of 2 parallel
entangled pairs
• Polarization coding
Polarizationentanglement distribution, violating Bell, in a scalable
fashion
In a In a NutshellNutshell……
Field 1WriteRead
Field 2
Writing Reading• Q. Repeaters, DLCZ …et Building Block
• Entanglement
Photon pair : α<1%Efficient retrieval : 50%Memory time ~ 10 µs
• Conditional Control
HeraldedWithout postselection, C~0.1
Asynchronous preparation
• Polarisation Entanglement2 nodes, 4 ensemblesBell violation
LU
LD RD
RU2L 2R
Node L Node R3m