Upload
clinton-darrell-martin
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Research on the Derivative Effect
Created by NEDO Projects
Sayaka Shishido,
Kazuo Fukui, Masaru Yamashita, Mitsuru Takeshita
NEDO, Evaluation Department
Research on the Derivative Effect
Created by NEDO Projects
Sayaka Shishido,
Kazuo Fukui, Masaru Yamashita, Mitsuru Takeshita
NEDO, Evaluation Department
Before Project During Project After Project
Public
Contracto
r( Co
mpany,
university,
etc. )
NEDO
Project FormationProject Formation
Project Management( Budget portfolio, codes and
standards, adjustments for situation changes, etc. )
Scheme of NEDO’s Projects and Position of Derivative Effects Scheme of NEDO’s Projects and Position of Derivative Effects
Activities for commercialization
Activities for commercialization
Commercialization completed!
Commercialization completed!
Derivative effect
Social Task Solve Task
R&D
< NEDO Project >< NEDO Project >
ProjectPlanning
( Setting goals and milestones )
: NEDO Project
: Flow of Main purpose of Project
: Flow of Derivative Effect
Activities for commercialization
of derivatives
Activities for commercialization
of derivatives
Commer-cialization of derivatives
Commer-cialization of derivatives
Use knowledge for other R&D ( start to develop of derivative
technology )
Use knowledge for other R&D ( start to develop of derivative
technology )
Main Theme
Main Theme
DerivativesDerivatives
2
Spread of technical Knowledge
Spread of technical Knowledge
During NEDO
ProjectAfter Project
Public
Contractor
( Company,
University,
etc. )
Business improvementReduce CO2
Technologyfor amorphous silicon devices
Approach for commercialization
Approach for commercialization
For example …For example …
Commercialization Of low cost PV system
Popularization of PV systems
Commercialization of large TFT panel
Energy security
Large TFT panelmanufacturing
equipment
Popularization of large TFT panel
Design, evaluation,
analysis technology
Output of NEDO ProjectIn-line large area
film-forming equipment
Use as design guide
R&D
Mai
n th
eme
Mai
n th
eme
DerivativesDerivatives
3
Follow-up Research
Research was started in FY2004.
Target: All entrusted companies (projects completed after FY2001)
Scope: Up to 5 years after project completion (years 1, 2, 4 and 6)
Questionnaires and interviews were used.
Derivatives
In the questionnaire, we asked about derivative technologies:
・ Were there such technologies?・ What type of technologies are they, where are they used, and by who?
・ Etc.
Project completion
Number of companies
FY2001 83FY2002 142FY2003 166FY2004 66FY2005 343FY2006 205FY2007 119
1,124
Methodology for Follow-up Monitoring Methodology for Follow-up Monitoring
4
ObjectiveObjective
We asked questions regarding the presence of derivative
technology from NEDO projects as part of our follow-up research.
To understand the overall context of derivative technology and
revalidate our survey technique, we conducted a study on the
following:
・ A general review of all follow-up research results starting
from FY2004
・ The results of new questions to focus on issues related to
derivative technology added in FY2009.
In addition, we prepared a case study on derivative effects,
especially technology transfer related to supercritical fluid.
5
Yes33%
No67%
All Energy companies
Industrial companies
Total 1,124 326 798
Technology 370 115 255
No Technology 754 211 543
Technology 32.9% 35.3% 32.0%
No Technology 67.1% 64.7% 68.0%
Companies With Derivative Technology Companies With Derivative Technology
Are there any derivative technologies?(FY2001 - FY2007)
Are there any derivative technologies?(FY2001 - FY2007)
6
1 3 50.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
Years 2 4 6
Technology 80 140 162No
Technology 311 251 229
Total 391 391 391
Development Period for Derived TechnologyDevelopment Period for Derived Technology
Relationship between number of years after project completion and percentage of companies having derivative technologyRelationship between number of years after project completion and percentage of companies having derivative technology
( Companies completing projects from FY2001 to FY2003)
7
中止 研究 技術開発 製品化 上市0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
無し
All Terminated
ResearchDevelopm
entPractical
applicationCommerci
al
Technology 370 18 126 155 39 32
No Technology 754 64 292 273 69 56
Total 1124 82 418 428 108 88
R&D Progress and Derivative Technology Developed During Projects R&D Progress and Derivative Technology Developed During Projects
Development stage of derivative technologies in the year following project completion
( Projects completed from FY2001 to FY2007 )
Development stage of derivative technologies in the year following project completion
( Projects completed from FY2001 to FY2007 )
8
■ No Technology
■ Technology
9
Yes39%
No61%
Technology 25No
Technology 39
Total 64
中止 研究 技術開発 製品化 上市0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
無し有り
Terminated
Research
Devel-opment
Practical applicati
on
Commercial Total
Yes 0 10 13 1 1 25
No 2 20 7 6 4 39
Total 2 30 20 7 5 64
Projectcompletion
Number of
companies
FY2001 0FY2002 11FY2003 0FY2004 1FY2005 32FY2006 0FY2007 20
Total 64
Example: Robot TechnologiesExample: Robot Technologies
5 projects, 64 companiesAre there any derivative
technologies?
Are there any derivative
technologies?
■ No Technology
■ Technology
0%10%
20%30%
40%50%
60%70%
80%90%
100%
所属部署 他部署 社外 その他Completion Companies
FY2003 102FY2004 39FY2005 286FY2006 187FY2007 118FY2008 51
Total 783
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
167
148
129
658
その他
製作物
評価・試験技術
科学的知見・データ
開発・製造技術
Type and Use of Derivative Technologies (FY2009, FY2010 ) Type and Use of Derivative Technologies (FY2009, FY2010 )
What type of technologieswere derived?
What type of technologieswere derived?
Where are derivative technologies used?
Where are derivative technologies used?
10
■ Own department ■ Other department■ Other companies ■ Other
■Other …………………
■Product ………………
■Testing tech. …………
■Scientific data…………
■Manufacturing tech. …
新製品の開発
新規研究開発テーマ(企画)の設定
人材育成を通じたノウハウの波及
研究開発ツールや社内技術標準として活用
既存製品(商品)の改良
既存事業・他分野の現象・メカニズム解明
既存製品の生産プロセスの効率化
その他
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Number of responses
Contents of Derivative Technologies ( Data for FY2010 ) Contents of Derivative Technologies ( Data for FY2010 )
Utilization of derivative technologies ( closed, multiple selection )Utilization of derivative technologies ( closed, multiple selection )
11
0.4%
4.3%
6.1%
8.2%
8.6%
10.0%
14.3%
24.4%
Other
Improvement of process used in existing products
Understanding phenomena and mechanisms
Improvement of standard products
R&D tools and technical standards
Know-how derived through HR cultivation
Setting of new theme
New product development
Year Companies
FY2004 41FY2006 187FY2008 51
Total 279
Survey Techniques for Derivative Technologies Survey Techniques for Derivative Technologies
Merits of Questionnaires
• Easy to clarify technology transfer in a company.
• Facts are collected through a bottom-up process, overestimates are fewer than in numerical analysis.
Weak Points of Questionnaires
• Facts for compilation are limited to only those provided by a respondent. It is therefore possible to underestimate.
- It is difficult to identify derivative effects that occur due to implicit knowledge and spillover effects through research papers.
- Amount of available data is reduced over time. 12
Case Study on Supercritical Fluid Case Study on Supercritical FluidWe prepared a case study on derivative effects, especially technology transfer related to supercritical fluid.
Fundamental technology development( Property database, mechanism analysis, measurement theory,
codes and standards, etc. )
Pure science( Public domain, science without commercial use )
Application development(Formulation as a system,
manufacturing technologies, etc.)
Products/services( Direct effect )
Fundamental
development
全体設計
Elemental development
Application developme
ntElemental development
for other fields
Application development for
other fieldsProducts/services
Technology transferDesign policy
System design
PR action for sales/capital investment
for mass productions
産業応用Ideas for industrial
application
Elemental development( Core technologies for materials or members )
Products/services
Products/services
Application for Application
Coal liquefaction
Alcohol concentration
Extraction of food ingredients (essence, fat acid, caffeine, etc. )
Environmental regulationsTechnology seeds of other fields
Dry cleaning
Painting
Micronized medicine
Hybridization and making nano- particles for electronic materials (hydrothermal synthesis )Analyze reactions and
phenomenaGain fundamental dataProperty simulationMake database
Washing and drying for semi-conductors and micromachinesCracking of woody biomass
Chemical recycling of plasticsSupercritical fluid chromatography
Reuse of chemical filters
Microreactor
“Trial and error” phase Fundamental project
External factors
“Tool utilization” phase
Example of chemical recyclingequipment
Supercritical Fluid R&D History
Triggers for Technology TransferTriggers Caused by Fundamental NEDO Project
① Solutions to technical problemsExamples: Information collection and development of a database for fundamental property data, visualization of phenomena, understanding reaction mechanisms, valid material selection, trials forlow cost methods (especially a continual process), etc.
Focusing on a valid target is necessary. ② No diffusion after completion of a fundamental project
Example: Key person with knowledge of functional maintenance of database, laboratory equipment, etc.
A project leader for a fundamental project may be an academic.
External Triggers ① New needs
Environmental regulations (volatile organic compound emissions, chlorofluorcarbon gas, etc.)More sophisticated and diversified specifications
② Technology seeds from other fieldsExamples: ・ Highly molecular medicine derived from biotechnology・ Semiconductor and micromachine microfabrication・ Fine chemicals, etc.
Timing of project planning is important as it serves as a bridge between
needs/seeds.
16
Summary Summary33% of surveyed companies responded that they have
developed derivative technology. (FY2001 - FY2007)
24% of surveyed companies responded that derivative technology is mainly used for new products and new R&D tasks.
3. Technology transfer after a fundamental technology project is derived from project and external triggers.
→ It is thought that NEDO projects produce an effect from mainstream R&D, and that they also add further value through new products and R&D themes that result from technology transfer.