RM Presentation IPL

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    1/27

    S I D D H A R T H A K . R A S T O G IS A T I SH Y . D E O D H A R

    I N D I A N I N S T I T U T E O F M A N A G E M E N T , A H M E D A B A D

    PLAYER PRICING AND VALUATION OF

    CRICKETING ATTRIBUTES:

    EXPLORING THE IPL TWENTY-TWENTY VISION

    Presented By:

    VINEETH.K

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    2/27

    ABSTRACT

    In April 2008, BCCI initiated Indian Premier League, a crickettournament of Twenty-Twenty overs to be played among eightdomestic teams.

    Team owners bid for the services of cricketers for a total of US$ 42million.

    Researchers here try to understand which attributes seem to beimportant and what could be their relative valuations.

    Employing the bid and offer curve concept of hedonic price analysisand econometrically establish a relation between the IPL-2008 finalbid prices and the player attributes.

    Number of half centuries, number of wickets taken, and number ofstumpings in all four forms of the game, batting average in thetwenty-twenty form of the game, batting strike rate (ODI), age,nationality, iconic status, and non-cricketing fame seem to be the

    critical attributes in the valuation of players.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    3/27

    INTRODUCTION

    The Indian Premier League (IPL) made its debut in Indiain April 2008.

    IPL is a tournament modeled on the lines of National

    Basketball Association (NBA) of USA and the EnglishPremier League of England.

    IPL is a professional Twenty-Twenty cricket league,launched by Board for Control of Cricket in India (BCCI)and has the backing of International Cricket Council

    (ICC). The tournament is played among eight teams, where

    twenty overs are bowled by each team in any givenmatch.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    4/27

    INTRODUCTION

    The eight teams represent eight different cities of India,the franchisee rights of which are auctioned-off for tenyears to successful bidders.

    The first round of the tournament is played on a doubleround-robin basis, where each team plays the otherseven teams at home and away.

    The top four teams play the two semi-finals, followed by

    a final at the end. Thus, the tournament involves a total of 59 matches of

    twenty-twenty overs each, to be played among eightteams.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    5/27

    INTRODUCTION

    While eleven players take the field in a match, each teammaintains at least sixteen players.

    Five of the teams have a designated icon players

    belonging to the regions , who is paid an amount fifteenpercent higher than the highest paid player in that team.

    The principal behind icon players is that an iconic playerfrom the vicinity of home city would be able to generatekeen interest in the team and for the tournament.

    The icon players and their teams are Virender Sehwagfor Delhi, Sourav Ganguly for Kolkata, Rahul Dravid forBangalore, Yuvraj Singh for Punjab, and SachinTendulkar for Mumbai.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    6/27

    INTRODUCTION

    For every team, there is a catchment area defined as perthe geographical location of the city they represent.

    The team must have at least four players from their

    respective catchment area and four Under-22 players. Each team can buy a maximum of eight overseas

    players; however, only four would take the field in amatch.

    Given the above ground rules, the franchisee ownersformed their teams by participating in an auction of thecricket players organized by the IPL authorities.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    7/27

    INTRODUCTION

    The prices received by the players varied quitesignificantly.

    For example :- Mahendra Singn Dhoni toped the list

    with a price of Rs. six crores then, and at the other end,players like Dominic Thornely received Rs. Ten lakhs.

    How are the bidding prices decided?

    What cricketing attributes and other factors are

    implicitly decisive in the final bid prices? Among these attributes, which are valued more than the

    others?

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    8/27

    LITERATURE REVIEW

    There have been several studies on players compensation invarious sports.

    Estenson (1994), MacDonald and Reynolds (1994), and Bennett andFlueck (1983) have studied player compensation in baseball.

    Dobson and Goddard (1998) and Kahn (1992) have consideredcompensation issues in football.

    There are also related studies in ice-hockey (Jones andWalsh, 1988)and basketball (Berri, 1999, and Hausman and Leonard, 1997).

    In cricket, there are a few studies which deal with scheduling thecricket matches (Armstrong andWillis, 1993;Wright, 1994; andWillis and Terrill, 1994).

    Barr and Kantor (2004) sought to determine the importantcharacteristics for a batsman in one-day cricket.

    However, there are no studies which links compensation to playerattributes.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    9/27

    METHODOLOGY

    The method used in measuring valuation of (cricketing) attributesleading to the formation of player price is Hedonic Price Analysis .

    Hedonic Price Analysis is based on the hypothesis that agood/service can be treated as a collection of attributes that

    differentiates it from other goods/services. Waugh (1928) propounded this concept based on his observation of

    different prices for different lots of vegetables.

    Waugh sought to identify the quality traits influencing daily marketprices.

    Later, Rosen (1974) based his model of product differentiation onthe hypothesis that goods are valued for their utility generatingattributes.

    According to him, while making a purchase decision, consumersevaluate product quality attributes, and pay the sum of implicitprices for each quality attribute, which is reflected in observedmarket price.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    10/27

    METHODOLOGY

    Extending the analogy to cricket, a cricket player isvalued for his on-the-field (and perhaps, off-the-field)performance.

    We propose that a cricket player sells his cricketingservices for the IPL tournament.

    The franchisee owners bid for the player services, forteam owners would like to maximize their utility

    (chances of winning and maximizing profit), and, playerperformance is an important arguments of their utilityfunction.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    11/27

    METHODOLOGY

    The final bid price of a player must be a function of thevaluation of winning attributes of a player.

    Therefore, given the data on values of various attributes of

    cricket players and their final bid prices, one can estimate thefollowing hedonic price equation econometrically,

    Pi = g ( zi1, ,zij, , zin),

    where Pi is the final bid price paid to a cricketer i for the IPLtournament and zij is the value of the attribute j of the cricket

    player i. The hedonic price equation, in this context, is a locusof equilibrium final bid prices and player attributes, wherebuyers (team owners) and sellers (cricket players) participatein an auction.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    12/27

    DATA AND REGRESSIONS RESULTS

    The data sources include the offical website of IPL andtwo other websites, Cricinfo andWikipedia.

    The bidding process involved 99 players; however, data

    is available only for 96 players. the final bidding price is considered as the dependent

    variable

    The independent variables were divided into two sets

    Dummy variables identifying qualitative attributes and Measurable variables based on past statistics of the

    cricketing attributes.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    13/27

    DATA AND REGRESSIONS RESULTS

    Considered various forms of regressions equations suchas double log, log-linear, linear-log and the linearregression, and experimented with the comprehensive

    data at hand. For all the functional forms of the regression equation,

    highly correlated variables and variables with low t-statistics, were progressively eliminated

    Selected ones that provided higher values of R-squareand adjusted R-square.

    The best fit among all the functional forms was the linearregression equation.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    14/27

    LINEAR REGRESSION EQUATION

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    15/27

    Description of Variables

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    16/27

    DATA AND REGRESSIONS RESULTS

    Icon players may garner local/regional support for reasonsother than their cricketing attributes. The dummy variablesMicon and Icon control for such non-cricketing attributes.

    They capture the iconic value of the player to the teamowners.

    There are two non-icon players who crossed the US$ 1 millionprice tag.

    One is Mahendra Singh Dhoni, very much liked by Indiansfor his personal charisma.

    The other is Andrew Symonds, famous for the controversiesarising out of his racial background.

    Both players are big crowd pullers and the dummy variableExicon captures the fame value of these players to the teamowners.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    17/27

    DATA AND REGRESSIONS RESULTS

    The dummy variable, Countryj is introduced to gauge thepremium players may receive for being Indian vis--vis theforeign players.

    Since the Australian team has been a top ranked team for anumber of years, we considered it as the base dummy.

    Very few players from Bangladesh, England, Zimbabwe, andWest Indies participated in the player auction, therefore, weput them all together in the country dummy, Other.

    A few other dummy variables were also considered, such asbatting hand, bowling hand, and bowling style,

    But these variables turned out to be statistically veryinsignificant, removing these dummies improved thegoodness of fit of the regression equation considerably.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    18/27

    DATA AND REGRESSIONS RESULTS

    The other set of independent variables are the measurablevariables based on past statistics of the cricketing attributes.

    The other set of independent variables are the measurable

    variables based on past statistics of the cricketing attributes. For example, batting related statistics includes variables such

    as runs scored, batting average, batting strike rate, number ofcenturies, and number of half centuries.

    Similarly, bowling related statistics includes variables such as

    number of wickets taken, bowling average, bowling economyrate, and bowling strike rate.

    The other important variables include number of stumpings,number of catches taken, and age.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    19/27

    DATA AND REGRESSIONS RESULTS

    Of the numerous statistics/variables mentioned above,the ones that best satisfy the goodness of fit criteria interms of t-statistics, R2, adjusted R2 and the f-statistics forvarious forms of regression equations were considered.

    These variables include: Batting average in twenty-twenty international matches

    Total number of half-centuries scored in all four forms ofcricket

    Batting strike-rate in one-day international matches Age of the player in completed years

    Total number of stumpings in all forms of cricket

    Total number of wickets taken in all forms of cricket.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    20/27

    Regression Results

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    21/27

    INTERPRETATION

    The parameter estimate of $499,037 for the variable miconreflects the premium Sachin Tendulkar, Saurav Ganguli,Rahul dravid, and Yuvaraj Singh earn for their regional iconicpopularity.

    Another icon player, Virender Sehawag, enjoys an iconicpremium of only us$ 382,274.

    The premium for two other players, though not having iconicstatus but who received a final bid price of more than us$ 1

    million is $794,580. Having controlled for the cricketing attributes, this high

    premium seems to be a reflection of their ability to draw hugecrowds nationally due to their charismatic nature and racialcontroversies surrounding them respectively.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    22/27

    INTERPRETATION

    Thus, out of the total price of $1.5 million and $1.12million received by mahendra singh dhoni and sachintendulkar

    The value of their cricketing attributes is $705,420 and$622,213 respectively.

    Their net crowd pulling business value is about $794,580and $499,037 respectively.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    23/27

    INTERPRETATION

    Does an Indian player command a premium over foreignplayers?

    The answer is, Yes.

    Among the foreign players, none receives any premiumfor their nationality, however, an Indian player, on anaverage, controlling for other attributes, is likely toreceive a premium of US$ 203,156 over non-Indian

    players.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    24/27

    INTERPRETATION

    Role of age in the final bid prices.

    Regular participation in games as well as biologicalaging is likely to make a person less fit progressively.

    Implicitly, this may get reflected in the final bid prices. The coefficient for age is found to be negative and

    statistically significant.

    On an average, a player loses out US$ 29,484 for getting

    older by one more year. Thus, premium for being younger in a twenty-twenty

    IPL tournament is well established in this study.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    25/27

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    26/27

    INTERPRETATION

    The only bowling related variable that finds importance

    in the player pricing is the total number of wickets takenin all forms of the game.

    . Every additional wicket taken earns a player us$ 377.

    This should not come as a surprise, for the twenty-

    twenty form of game seems to be dominated bybatsmen.

  • 8/6/2019 RM Presentation IPL

    27/27