Upload
gary-shepherd
View
222
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© 2001 Steve Krug
Who is he, anyway?
Steve Krug (steev kroog) (noun) 1. Son, husband, father 2. Resident of Brookline, MA3. Usability consultant
Advanced Common Sense Me and a few well-placed mirrors Corporate motto: “It’s not rocket surgery™”
Nice clients Lexus.com Bloomberg.com Technology Review
Show of hands
Help me calibrate Have read Don’t Make Me Think? Wondering when I’ll write another
book?
© 2001 Steve Krug
My solution? Usability testing
Best thing I know of for quieting arguments Based on watching users, not personal
biases Creates a shared experience Aha moment: Our users are not like us You’re too close to realize how little
they know See it through their eyes
It just works© 2001 Steve Krug
What is a usability test?
Watching people try to use what you create while thinking out loud
NOT a focus group Focus groups are about opinions Usability tests are about watching use
© 2001 Steve Krug
Most sites don’t get tested
$$$ Time Even if there was enough money,
there aren’t enough professionals
© 2001 Steve Krug
Traditional usability testing
Lab Experienced professional 8 users, minimum Big honkin’ report Weeks of work, usually by an
outsider $5k - $10k Happens rarely
© 2001 Steve Krug
© 2001 Steve Krug
Do-it-yourself usability testing
Three users per round Three should be plenty You’ll be doing it again next month You’ll find more problems than you can
fix No lab or mirrors
Set up a monitor in another room so the development team can watch
No elaborate recruiting “Recruit loosely and grade on a curve”
© 2001 Steve Krug
Do-it-yourself usability testing
Record with Camtasia or Morae (Techsmith.com) or CamStudio
No stats, no exit questions, no faux validity
No big report Debrief over lunch
We need a volunteer
Qualifying criteria: Have used a Web browser English-speaking adult Doesn’t work for AT&T Wireless It’s painless!
You’ll get a big round of applause when we’re done
© 2001 Steve Krug
© 2001 Steve Krug
When this happens: Say this:You’re not absolutely sure you know what the user is thinking (see below).
“What are you thinking?”
“What are you looking at?” (for variety)
“What are you doing now?” (e.g., if you think they’re being silent because they’re reading)
Something happens that seems to surprise them. For instance, they click on a link and go “Oh” when the new page appears.
“Is that what you expected to happen?”
They’re trying to get you to give them a clue. (“Should I use the ___?”)
“What would you do if you were at home?”
“What would you do if I wasn't here?”
The participant makes a comment, and you’re not sure what triggered it.
“Was there something in particular that made you think that?”
The participant suggests concern that he’s not giving you what you need.
“No, this is very helpful.”
“This is exactly what we need.”The participant asks you to explain how something is supposed to work. (“Do these support requests get answered right away?”)
“I can’t answer that right now, because we need to know what you would do when you don’t have somebody around to answer questions for you. But if you still want to know when we’re done, I’ll be glad to answer it then.”
The participant seems to have wandered away from the task.
“What are you trying to do now?”
© 2001 Steve Krug
Naturally, we need to test people who are just like our target
audience. … people who are a lot like
our users.
… people who actually use our
site.
Representative users!
Real users!
One problem: testing works too well
If you’ve done any testing, you know uncovers lots of problems quickly
This is part of the problem: It takes far less resources to find
problems than to fix them You can find more in a day than you
can fix in a month
© 2001 Steve Krug
© 2001 Steve Krug
Problems you can find with just a few test participants
Problemsyou have theresources to fix
© 2001 Steve Krug
Your motto should be…
What’s the smallest change we can make that we think might solve the observed problem?
Tweak, don’t redesign Often the best solution is removing
something, not adding something
© 2001 Steve Krug
Thanks for all the fish
Send any questions, feedback, gripes to
[email protected]@skrug on the Twitter
And come visit
www.sensible.com