Upload
buibao
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Warta River BasinSummary of Background Paper
Andrzej Tonderski, ENVISTON, POMCERTKrystian Piechowiak, RZGW POZNAN
May 2005 River Basin Management Workshop
2
ZACHODNIOZACHODNIO--POMORSKIEPOMORSKIE
POMORSKIEPOMORSKIE WARMIWARMIŃŃSKOSKOMAZURSKIEMAZURSKIE
PODLASKIEPODLASKIEKUJAWSKOKUJAWSKOPOMORSKIEPOMORSKIE
LUBUSKIELUBUSKIE
WIELKOPOLSKIEWIELKOPOLSKIE
DOLNODOLNOŚŚLLĄĄSKIESKIE
ŁŁÓÓDZKIEDZKIE
MAZOWIECKIEMAZOWIECKIE
LUBELSKIELUBELSKIE
ŚŚWIWIĘĘTOTO--KRZYSKIEKRZYSKIEOPOLSKIEOPOLSKIE
ŚŚLLĄĄSKIESKIEPODKARPACKIEPODKARPACKIE
MAMAŁŁOPOLSKIEOPOLSKIE
Administrative Divisionof POLAND:
May 2005 River Basin Management Workshop
3
RIVER BASINS:ODRAWISŁABALTIC SEEOTHER
RIVER BASINS:ODRAWISŁABALTIC SEEOTHER
River Basins according to theHydrological Atlas of Poland
May 2005 River Basin Management Workshop
4
in WROCŁAW
in POZNAŃ
in SZCZECIN
in KATOWICE
in WARSZAWA
in GDAŃSK
in KRAKÓW
REGIONAL WATER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES
Hydrological vs. Administrativedivision of Poland:
May 2005 River Basin Management Workshop
5
ZACHODNIOPOMORSKIE
POMORSKIE
KUJAWSKO-POMORSKIE
LUBUSKIE
WIELKOPOLSKIE
ŁÓDZKIE
ŚLĄSKIE
OPOLSKIE
Warta River Basin &Voivodeship Borders
May 2005 River Basin Management Workshop
6
WARTA RIVER BASINWARTA RIVER BASINThe main riversThe main riversWARTAWARTANOTEĆNOTEĆOBRAOBRAPROSNAPROSNANERNER
Partial Drainage BasinsPartial Drainage BasinsUPPER WARTA 15794 km2UPPER WARTA 15794 km2
LOWER WARTA 14146 km2LOWER WARTA 14146 km2
UPPER NOTEC 4037 km2UPPER NOTEC 4037 km2
LOWER NOTEC 13293 km2LOWER NOTEC 13293 km2
OBRA 3053 km2OBRA 3053 km2
PROSNA 4925 km2PROSNA 4925 km2
GWDAGWDADRAWADRAWABYDGOSKI CHANNELBYDGOSKI CHANNELŚLESIŃSKI CHANNELŚLESIŃSKI CHANNEL
May 2005 River Basin Management Workshop
8
When What How
1919 Establishment of the Ministry of Public Works
Occurs soon after Polish independence is re-established following World War I
1922 The First Water Law Act
1930 Inter-Ministerial Commission for Protecting Rivers from Pollution
Beginning of central government attention to water quality protection
1960 Institute of Water Management Planning, investigating, and analyzing water resources
1964 District Directorates of Water Management (DDWM)
Maintenance and operation of hydraulic works such as dams and reservoirs, stream channels, etc.
1972 Ministry of Administration, Country Planning and Environmental Protection
Water quality protection is combined with other environmental protection responsibilities in one central government agency
1973 Institute of Meterology and Water Management
Planning and analysis functions of prior Institute of Water Management merged with former Institute of Hydrology and Meterology.
1974 Water Management and Water Protection Act (1974 Water Law)
Established basic system of permit requirements for water uses
Institutional Development of Water Management in Poland
May 2005 River Basin Management Workshop
9
Objectives of the water management reform:
• To arrest pollution of the water resources,• To protect drinking water sources• To increase participation of water users
and other stakeholders in integrated water resource management,
• To provide effective flood prevention and control mechanisms.
May 2005 River Basin Management Workshop
10
Institutional Development of Water Management in Poland
When What How
1989 Funds for Environmental Protection and Water Management
Previously separate funds combined; providing financing for environmental protection and water management projects
1991 Regional Boards of Water Management (RBWM)
Established to provide water resource planning at the river basin level
1991 Governmental Policy on Environmental Protection
1997 Amendments to 1974 Water Law Add to responsibilities of RBWMs, but larger effort to reform water law fails to pass
1999 Regional Water Management Authorities (RWMA)Ministry of Environment
Created through merger of DDWM and RBWMSeparate ministry established with duties of environmental protection and water management
2000 Bureau of Water Management Main responsibilities: harmonize the activities of RWMAs, prepare for transition to new water management structure provided in new water law
2001 Act on Water Law, Act on Collective Water Supply and Wastewater Discharge Systems, Act on Environmental Law all adopted
2002 National Board of Water Management Advisory role in issues related to water policy and water resource management, with consultation from RWMA directors
May 2005 River Basin Management Workshop
11
Water Management Links between Stakeholders in Poland (modified from Słota 2000)
Starosta VoivodeshipInspector of Environmental Protection
Department of Environmental Protection, Agriculture & Forestry
VoivodeMarshal
Department of Environmental ProtectionVoivodeship
Boards of Land Improvements and Water Facilities
Water resources, rivers and streams, hydrotechnical facilities
Minister of Environment
State Forestry EnterpriseNational Forests
Regional Water Management Autorities
Chief Inspector ofEnvironmentalProtection
Water users
Municipality Industry Agriculture
May 2005 River Basin Management Workshop
12
RWMAs tasks of water management:• making balances of surface and underground waters, • determining the conditions of use of the basin rivers, • acting as a party in legal proceedings in the cases regarding the
specific use of inland waters and other administrative proceedings pertinent to water management and protection,
• keeping the water databases (cadasters), • balancing the material and financial needs relative to the water
management in the basin, • initiating studies and research on the development and protection of
surface and underground waters, • working out programs and plans of water resources management,
water protection, flood and drought prevention, • giving opinions on designs and siting of investments that may
appreciably affect the water management and objects to be localised within the high water beds.
May 2005 River Basin Management Workshop
13
Organization of the Poznan RWMA:
• Organizational and Legislative Department, which includes lawyers, tries to keep track of and respond to national laws and policies relating to water management.
• State Asset Ownership and Protection Department reflects the 2001 merger of the RBWM with the hydrotechnical agency, which brought to the RWMA a number of responsibilities for administering and maintaining state-owned assets in the basin (some of which don’t have to do with water).
• Center for Flood Protection Department is responsible primarily for planning, coordination, and decision-support functions related to flood prevention, flood control, and flood response.
• Maintenance of Water and Hydro-Facilities Department handles technical matters of facility management. There is a division within this department that is related to administrative and planning functions, e.g., if a local government or private entity were going to execute a new development that would cross or otherwise encounter some water facilities.
• Water Resources Department operates and maintains the river basin database, and handles the RWMA’s role in the water permit process.
May 2005 River Basin Management Workshop
14
Budget of RWMA in Poznan:• Annual budget: $1.8
million, 99.5% of which comes from central government.
• 73.8% of budget is used for investments in the basin,
• 5.9% for other development activities,
• 2.2% for water quality activities,
• 0.1% for operations and maintenance,
• 18% for administration and other.
May 2005 River Basin Management Workshop
15
Water Quality in Warta River BasinBased on physico-chemical parametersData for 1995
Source:
Outside classification
Water quality classes
May 2005 River Basin Management Workshop
16
source: WIOŚ
Water qualityin the Warta River Basinbased on physico-chemical parameters(2003)
May 2005 River Basin Management Workshop
17
Water Quality in Warta River BasinBased on bacteriological parametersData for 1995
Water quality classes
Outside classification
Source:
May 2005 River Basin Management Workshop
18
Water qualityin the Warta River Basinbased on bacteriological parameters(2003)
source: WIOŚ
May 2005 River Basin Management Workshop
19
Conclusion (Achievements):• Rational system of water tarifs,• Wastewater discharge control,• Water resource planning,• Decentralised and coordinated
management
May 2005 River Basin Management Workshop
20
Conclusion (Weaknesses):• Institutional boundaries are not clear (or
are complicated),• Basin organisations do not have
independent revenue source,• Basin organisations do not have strong
representation and participation from the stakeholders and user groups